Boscombe Valley Mystery ~ A.Conan Doyle ~ 01/03
jane
November 26, 2003 - 07:10 am
Bill H
November 25, 2003 - 05:28 pm
In the Classical Mystery Discussion a few of us got together and thought it would be nice to do a short Sherlock Holmes story. It was decided "The Boscombe Valley Mystery" would be the one discussed, and it can be read on line along with all the other Sherlock Holmes stories and novels. For so short a story the discussion schedule will be only seven or eight days. If any of you Sherlock fans are interested in joining in please let me know here so that I can move it to Upcoming Attractions and schedule the discussion. Also, if you would like to read this tale on line please click The Complete Sherlock Holmes link in the heading. This short story can be found under The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes. I believe "The Boscombe Valley Mystery" is the fourth story listed under that heading. After you click on it you will see "Text on Line" I belive "bookrags" offers the best reading font.
Bill H
Bill H
November 26, 2003 - 12:39 pm
HAPPY THANGSGIVING
Bill H
BaBi
November 28, 2003 - 08:22 am
I'm interested, Bill. I want to read the story anyway. ...Babi
Bill H
November 28, 2003 - 10:47 am
BaBi, thank you for posting.Bill H
Marvelle
November 28, 2003 - 12:13 pm
Bill, I'm in for this discussion, especially since I don't remember this title. It'll be fun to read it with other classical mystery fans.Marvelle
Bill H
November 28, 2003 - 05:21 pm
Marvelle, thank you for joining in.Bill H
Marvelle
November 28, 2003 - 07:09 pm
I've printed out the biography of Conan Doyle which I've not read. Bill, it seems I knew very little of Conan Doyle for I kept getting these new bits of info as I read. I hadn't realized that he was such an adventuresome man, spending time with the Jesuits in Austria, as a ship's doctor sailing to the Arctic on a whaler and another ship to the West African coast, opening a medical practice, serving as a war correspondent, detective work.... what didn't the man do? I've always thought of him as 'the writer of Sherlock Holmes mysteries' when he was so much more.Marvelle
Bill H
November 29, 2003 - 10:09 am
Marvelle, I love when the biographies of authors are placed in the heading. your mention of him being a war correspondent made me believe even more he was bringing a little of himself to the Holmes' stories through the character of Dr. Watson.. Thank you for that insight of Sir A Conan Doyle.Bill H
Scrawler
December 1, 2003 - 10:18 am
Count me in. I'm really looking forward to the discussion. It's been some time since I've read anything by Arthur Conan Doyle. Don't look now but the game's a foot!
See you soon.
Scrawler
Bill H
December 1, 2003 - 10:46 am
Scrawler, thank you! Now it's as go. I'll move it up to "Upcoming" and place a reading schedule there.Bill H
Bill H
December 1, 2003 - 06:32 pm
I am reading this story from my book called "The Illustrated Sherlock Holmes Treasury." In my book, the story is sixteen pages in length. There are no chapters, therefore, I am going to schedule the first eight pages as part One and the remaining eight pages as part Two. The last paragraph of the eighth page (part One)reads as follows:
"Yes, that is it." It was a widespread, comfortable-looking
building, two-storied, slate-roofed, with great yellow blotches
of lichen upon the gray walls. The drawn blinds and the smokeless
chimneys, however, gave it a stricken look, as though the weight
of this horror still lay heavy upon it. We called at the door,
when the maid, at Holmes's request, showed us the boots which her
master wore at the time of his death, and also a pair of the
son's, though not the pair which he had then had. Having measured
these very carefully from seven or eight different points, Holmes
desired to be led to the court-yard, from which we all followed
the winding track which led to Boscombe Pool."
I belive "bookrags" offers the best font face for reading the story on line. Here's a link
Bookrags
Bill H
FrancyLou
December 2, 2003 - 11:41 am
Thanks Bill - I will be here with you (as usual). This is exciting!
Bill H
December 2, 2003 - 05:51 pm
FrancyLou, Happy you are joining in. I think it will be a fun discussion. Bill H
jane
December 2, 2003 - 06:07 pm
This discussion will open on January 2.
Bill H
December 30, 2003 - 11:33 am
Illustration:: Sydney Paget
Welcome to the "Boscombe Valley Mystery" discussion.
The Sherlock Holmes stories have held a fascination for me from a very young boy to this day. Through the years I have imagined Sherlock Holmes as a living person and not as some book character a live only on the written pages of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Of course I know better and always have, but I suppose most of us have experienced this feeling at one time or another about Sherlock Holmes.
I selected this short story because it is an easy read and the plot is not to difficult to understand. So here is a chance to express your feelings about the Sherlock Holmes character, his pursuits and the author of the stories. And, of course, the selected story .
Many thanks to Marjorie for assisting me with the heading
"Come Watson the game is afoot!"
Bill H
BaBi
January 2, 2004 - 01:17 pm
And here I am with both feet!
I have a link to a site where I can read this story, and I plan to take it a bit at a time so each stage is fresh in my mind. Early on is this 'hallmark' of the Holmes style:
"a trivial example of observation and inference. Therein lies my metier.."
I was also pleased to see Holmes compliment to Watsons 'military' orderliness. The fact that he seeks him out to accompany him on this mystery also speaks of Holmes' regard for Watson. I intend to be looking for other instances of Watson receiving the respect he deserves and failed to get from film portrayals.
Babi
Bill H
January 2, 2004 - 02:34 pm
Welcome, Babi, and I compliment you on your observation of Holmes' observations. Indeed Holms did have a high regard for Watson's input on all matters. I'm sure Sherlock used his companion as a sounding board to test his theories for validity. And Sherlock Holmes should've had a compliment for Mrs. Watson, also. She was in every respect understanding when Dr. Watson tore away from the breakfast table to accompany the detective on the trip.
Bill H
AlleyKat
January 2, 2004 - 03:17 pm
Hi this is my first time in the book discussions, and I hope I can add some insight. I had to chuckle when near the end of this selection Holmes is talking to Lestrade. At first Lestrade insults himself when he says "I find it hard to enough to tackle facts, Holmes, without flying away after theories and fancies" to which Holmes replies "you are right, you do find it hard to tackle the facts". This is followed by Lestrade saying "...and that all theories to the contrary are the merest moonshine." and Holmes replying "Well,moonshine is brighter than fog." (obviously referring to his companion) The comments on the Detective's mental facility are obvious to all except to Lestrade.
Bill H
January 2, 2004 - 04:22 pm
Welcome, AlleyKat, I am very happy you chose this discussion for your first time in a book discussion. Please be assured you will be welcome in all of the Book/Literature discussions. Yes, I got a chuckle out of Sherlock's left handed compliment to Lestrade, but I couldn't help but wonder if Lestrade chose to ignore the pointed remark or, as you say, the comment was lost on him. The inspector was the perfect foil for Holmes. However, Lestrade seemed to look upon Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson as friendly counterparts and, to the best of my knowledge, never thought of them as foes to be reckoned with.
Bill H
Marvelle
January 2, 2004 - 09:46 pm
Welcome, AlleyKat. Hello to all Classical Mystery enthusiasts.I thought it strange that Lestrade - he of Scotland Yard - called Holmes a colleague and strange too that Lestrade was "retained" by the young woman "to work out the case in his [the accused man's] interest." So do Scotland Yard men freelance? Like policeman today working as security officers on the side? I think Lestrade is indulging in wishful thinking when he equates himself on the level of SH as a colleague.
When I read SH as a youngster so much of the richness of the writing and the background escaped me. I was focused on the puzzle alone. Funny how reading habits change. Now I enjoy the journey that a story takes me on and I notice the special inclusions of each writer. For instance, I hadn't remembered SH and Dr. Watson as being 'readers'. In these introductory pages of this short story, SH reads Petrarch, Watson tosses aside a yellow-covered novel as being unworthy, and Holmes later starts a conversation about the then-controversial George Meredith with his friend Watson. All in a few pages!
Marvelle
Marvelle
January 2, 2004 - 10:06 pm
Bill H
January 3, 2004 - 09:56 am
Hi, Marvelle, and thank you for the links. I, too, stopped to ponder when I read "…yellow-covered novel…." It started me wondering if, in those days, they also had their fly-by-night tabloids practicing yellow journalism and indulging in character assassination, as well as unworthy stories. In the opening paragraphs of the story, Conan Doyle showed us the presumptuous nature of SH. The telegram Sherlock sent Watson gave the doctor only a few hours to join him on his trip to Boscombe Valley. This showed a disregard or lack of understanding for the doctor's medical practice as well as any arrangements Mrs. Watson may have planed.
Bill H
Scrawler
January 3, 2004 - 12:18 pm
Watson:
"We were seated at breakfast one morning, my "wife" and I, when the maid brought in a telegram."
It wasn't until I read this sentence that I realized that Watson was even married. Then I read the following in the "Introduction" of Sherlock Homes: The Complete Novels and Stories:
"What emerges then, be he lean and brown or square and muscular, is a figure both distinctive and arresting, more Bulldog Drummond than Sancho Panza, and "strongly" attracted to women, who in turn find him attractive. In "The Sign of Four" Watson himself uncharacteristically boasts of "an experience of women, which extends over many nations and three separate continents". He is often observed admiring a clean profile or a trim ankle, and his memory for the details of a handsome female client's dress rivals Homes's more practical one. But he is no callous swordsman and commits himself willingly to the chains of martimony when the lovely Mary Morstan beckons in "Four".
Which brings us to...Watson's marriages. We here first of his bereavement in "The Adventure of the Empty House"; then, in "The adventure of the Blanched Soldier," dated nine years later, Homes alludes querulously to his friend's desertion of him for a wife. The obvious conclusion is that he remarried." The paragraph goes on to suggest that Watson had "five" wives.
Does anyone know if Watson was really married five times? And if Watson was married five times, what happened to them? One reason would be that he lost them through death as it is suggested in "The Adventure of the Empty House". Could "being pals" with Sherlock Homes have anything to do with it. Perhaps the answer is in the opening pragraph of "The Boscombe Valley Mystery".
"What do you say dear?" said my wife, looking across at me. "Will you go?"
"I really don't know what to say. I have a fairly long list at present."
"Oh, Anstruther would do your work for you. You have been looking a little pale lately. I think that the change would do you good, and you are always so interested in Mr. Sherlock Homes' cases."
What is your take on this dialogue? Does his wife seem to think that she doesn't mind Watson going off with Homes or is she being sarcastic about Watson being "so interested in Mr. Sherlock Homes's cases"? Or does she have another reason for wanting Watson out of the house?
horselover
January 3, 2004 - 02:48 pm
Five wives! And I was wondering when Watson had acquired the one mentioned in this story. Scrawler, please let us know what else you find out about all these spouses.
In "The Red-Headed League" Holmes says, "I know, my dear Watson, that you share my love of all that is bizarre and outside the conventions and humdrum routine of every-day life." Perhaps this was the reason Watson could not stay married to one wife for long. After all, marriage does involve a commitment to the routine of everyday life. I don't think I'd be very happy with a husband who ran off WITHOUT ME to take part in solving an interesting mystery. And then, of course, there is Watson's reaction to the lovely, young Miss Turner. )
Actually, we know pretty early on that the murderer is probably not "the son of the murdered man." Holmes expresses his doubts about the circumstantial evidence and the so-called "confession" right from the start. The son appears to have known little of his father's previous relationship to Mr. Turner and his life in Victoria.
Holmes, of course, suspects immediately that there is something fishy in the relationship of the two old men--their previous history in Victoria and the insistence of McCarthy upon his son's marriage to Miss Turner. The problem in this story is that most of the solution becomes clear to the reader before Holmes explains it at the end. Still, it's fun to find one's reading of the clues confirmed.
BaBi
January 3, 2004 - 02:56 pm
Tch, Scrawler, do I 'detect' a note of cynicism? From my vague impressions of Watson's wife on the occasions she was mentioned in the Holmes stories, I recall an intelligent, thoughtful, and understanding woman. She feels an outing would do her husband good; why attribute ulterior motives?
I would also give Holmes the benefit of a doubt, Bill. He had a train to catch, he hoped Watson might be free to join him. Note that he says: "It is reaily very good of you to come, Watson," said he. "It makes a considerable difference to me, having someone with me on whom I can thoroughly rely." He recognizes that it was "really very good" of Watson. I don't believe he was being presumptuous in inviting his friend.
...Babi
Bill H
January 3, 2004 - 06:17 pm
Welcome, Scrawler and Horselover, so glad you joined in. Swrawler, I seriously doubt Watson was married five times, however your reflections on the doctor and Mrs. Watson gives us all pause for thought. ) But perhaps our doctor was looking a little pale.Yes, Babi, Holmes does compliment Watson as being a very reliable partner. Thank you for bringing that my attention.
Horselover, I suppose this is unwarranted, but when I read the son's name was Charles McCarthy, I couldn't help but think of the famous pair of Edgar Bergen and Charlie McCarthy. Seeing the name appear in your post jogged my mind of them again. Did any of you think of this.
Bill H
Bill H
January 3, 2004 - 06:56 pm
Conan Doyle acquaints us with the comfort and reliability of the British railroad system of the Victorian age. Many of the Sherlock Holmes stories make use of the railroad for their transportation. The above Sydney Paget illustration shows the pair traveling to Boscombe Valley in one of the compartments. Watson points out "We had the carriage to ourselves…" I would imagine traveling in such a compartment in that era was most comfortable. Holmes tells Watson, "If you keep the two corner seats I shall get the tickets." Do you suppose that to obtain such a compartment would mean paying first class fare?
To view more of the larger and much better Sydney Paget illustrations of Holmes and Watson please click on this link
Illustrations Bill H
horselover
January 3, 2004 - 07:50 pm
Bill, I didn't think of Charlie McCarthy until you mentioned the famous puppet we probably all remember. Actually, his "father and son" story is kind of sad, too. In interviews and in her book, Candice Bergen always said she was jealous of Charlie because her father loved him more and spent so much time with him. This must have been a strange family dynamic, living with a puppet that was treated like a favored child and trying to compete with it.
Bill H
January 4, 2004 - 11:52 am
Yes, Horselover, I saw the interview of Candice Bergen where she related her feeling about "Charlie."After Marvelle brought the following to our attention "…retained Lestrade…" it gave me pause and I reread that part.. I place a section of the paragraph here for your convenience
"There are several people in the neighborhood, however, and among them Miss Turner, the daughter of the accused, who believe in his innocence, and have retained Lestrade…to work out the case for them."
I noticed the title Inspector was not used and both Holmes and Watson refer to Lestrade as Mr. Lestrade, and as was pointed out Lestrade referred to Holmes as a colleague. I can't help but suppose Lestrade was working as a private investigator because he "referred the case to Holmes???? However, that being said, who represented the official police? Conan Doyle was not very clear on this and has somewhat confused me.
Bill H
horselover
January 4, 2004 - 12:46 pm
Yes, Lestrade's position in this case is ambiguous. The physical description of him is not very flattering either: "A lean, ferret-like man,furtive and sly-looking, was waiting for us on the platform."
However, in "The Hound of the Baskervilles," Lestrade definitely seems to be with the police. He shows up on the scene with a warrant, and Holmes refers to him as "the best of the professionals." He is refered to as Inspector Lestrade.
As far as the official police in this case, they had apparently already completed their case and arrested their suspect. It was now up to Holmes and Watson to uncover the truth of the matter.
BaBi
January 4, 2004 - 01:44 pm
It would help if Doyle had explained Lestrade's postion, but then, perhaps that information is in earier stories. Does "Hound of the Baskervilles" pre-date the "Bascombe Valley Mystery"? I wonder if Lestrade is retired from the police, and now pursuing a career as a private investigator?
I found myself agreeing competely with Holmes assessment of Charles McCarthy's responses and behavior. To me, they seemed completely those of an frank and open...and innocent...personality. (Besides, we know the son can't be guilty, or there would be no point to Holmes' intervention. One of the perks of being the reader and a fan.)
So...Q#1 in my mind...why would Mr. McCarthy be so set on pushing a marriage between his son and Miss Turner, when all other parties are obviously not in agreement? I think the answer to that will be a key point.
Babi
Scrawler
January 4, 2004 - 02:09 pm
"It is really very good of you to come, Watson," said he, "it makes a considerable difference to me, having someone with me on whom I can thoroughly rely. Local aid is always either worthless or else biased. If you will keep the two corner seats I shall get the tickets."
From this this passage I see Holmes as an upper class Victorian English gentlemen. He is glad to have his friend along to help him out, but in what capacity? We know that Watson is not the bumbling fool that Hollywood made him out, but how is he seen by Holmes?
"This period within which the stories were set and against which they can be examined was one of social, economic, and political change. They came at a time when the growing degree of literacy was combined with an expanding amount of leisure time. Thus, the era was right for this particular type of story. The periodical was a significant channel of communication; fiction had a growing influence; and a new concept, the best seller, was developing. This was a literature not for the elite, but for the people."
Does the "Adventures of Sherlock Homes" really reflect the period in which they were written. Is this type of story really for the people? If you lived during the period of time this book was written, would you have read it? Did the people of the time consider "local aid...either worthless or else bias" or is this something out of the imagination of the author? Do we feel the same about our police detectives in our own time period?
"Have you heard anything of the case?" he asked.
"Not a word. I have not seen a paper for some days."
"The London press has not had very full accounts. I have just been looking through all the recent papers in order to master the particulars. It seems, from what I gather, to be one of those SIMPLE cases which are so extremely difficult."
"That sounds a little paradoxical."
"But it is profoundly true. Singularity is almost invaribly a clue. The more featureless and commonplace a crime is, the more difficult it is to bring it home. In this case, however, they have established a very serious case against the son of the murdered man."
What do you think of the above scene? How true is it that "the more fetureless and commonplace a crime is, the more difficult it is to bring it home"? Why are simple cases so difficult to solve? Is it because we or the detectives assume things to be true that really are not in evidence?
horselover
January 4, 2004 - 04:32 pm
BaBi, Your Q#1 is answered in the story, but I don't know if Bill wants us to discuss the solution at this time.
horselover
January 4, 2004 - 04:52 pm
Inspector George Lestrade
An inspector of Scotland Yard with the tenacity of a bulldog, Sherlock Holmes categorized him as lacking in imagination and often out of his depth. He shares a professional rivalry with Inspector Gregson. According to Watson, his physique is lean and ferret-like. Despite his condescending attitude towards Sherlock Holmes and his methods, he frequently consults the Great Detective when a particularly singular crime leaves him at a loss. He is not as reluctant to take full credit for solving the case, however.
Marvelle
January 4, 2004 - 04:56 pm
The story links Lestrade with Scotland Yard as well as mentioning that a few locals have 'retained' Lestrade to clear Charles of the murder.As Holmes and Watson arrive at the railtrip's destination, the town of Ross, Watson writes: "A lean, ferret-like man, furtive and sly-looking, was waiting for us upon the platform. In spirt ofthe light brown dustcoat and leather-leggings which he wore in deference to his rustic surroundings, I had no difficulty in recognizing Lestrade, of Scotland Yard.
Lestrade's position is indeed ambiguous.
Marvelle
AlleyKat
January 4, 2004 - 06:18 pm
Scrawler, you pose a good question. I checked out the anthology from my local library and it has an introduction (no word on who edited it) and it says "..first appeared in the Strand. The periodical was the sensation of the day...when eager readers lined up outside the magazine's London offices, waiting for each installment as it was published." From this I would assume that many people were avid readers, which coincides with my impression of the Victorian era.
As the Enlightenment was winding down, people took a new interest in fiction, with Doyle's stories being favored, just as they are today.
Bill H
January 4, 2004 - 07:21 pm
Scrawler, asks,"From this this passage I see Holmes as an upper class Victorian English gentlemen. He is glad to have his friend along to help him out, but in what capacity?"I believe Holmes looks upon Watson as a truly trustworthy, reliable friend, a friend that will back him up when the "chips" are down. We have seen Holmes' trust of Watson's judgment in other stories, when he sent Dr. Watson off alone on missions pertaining to a case.
Scrawler, you also ask. "Would you have read it"
Well, I believe I would have because the Sherlock Holmes stories that appeared in The Strand had an eagerly awaited following. The British citizens of that era seemed to love reading about the aristocracy and other wealthy land holders. Perhaps I have been a bit redundant in that last sentence.
"Does it truly reflect the times?".
Well, it depends on what you mean. The Holmes stories, for the most part, do not deal with the impoverished class of England, they do describe the life of the wealthy and landed gentry of the period. These are the people that could afford his services. I don't imagine for an instant that Sherlock Holmes did all his cases pro bono. However, I'm sure this is the class of people that Conan Doyle believed the masses wanted to read about in order to escape from their every day humdrum life. For example, we here in America display an avid interest in reading about celebrities and British royalty(I here excuse myself)what sugar plum fairies go dancing throug a readers head while reading about these things.
You have asked very good, thought provoking questions, questions that make a discussion worthwhile. I shall endeavor to learn the chronology of this story.
Bill H
Bill H
January 4, 2004 - 07:44 pm
I must correct a mistake I made in one of my earlier posts. I said then, "There are several people in the neighborhood, however, and among them Miss Turner, the daughter of the accuse, who believe in his innocence…" I should have typed, "…among them Miss Turner, the daughter of the neighboring landowner…"
Please excuse the error.
Bill H
Bill H
January 4, 2004 - 07:53 pm
The chronological order of the stories can be seen by clicking on following link. The year of publication appear beside the title. So far I cannot find the month of the various publications. I hope this will help. Chronological Order
The same can be seen by clicking on the "Complete Sherlock Holmes" link found in the heading.
Bill H
Marvelle
January 4, 2004 - 10:03 pm
Bill, French novels were usually published in England with yellow covers during the Victorian Era. Don't know why unless it suggested to potential buyers either a type of romance or something racy. Watson tossed aside, due to lack of interest, a yellow book.Marvelle
BaBi
January 5, 2004 - 09:09 am
I believe "French novel" in the Victorian era implied something racy (by their standards), that respectable young ladies only read in secret. The yellow cover would identify them, I suppose, much in the same way a shiny embossed cover with a bosomy woman clinging to a bare-chested male does in today's market. I mean, you can spot them from a distance.
Horselover, I didn't doubt my question would be answered; it's sticking out like a wart on the nose. Other questions, of course, are... "To whom else would Mr. McCarthy announce his presence by crying 'Coo-eee'? What past history have Mr. Turner and Mr. McCarthy? Mr. McCarthy returned home to go to this meeting at the pond. So he was meeting someone from close by. At this point, I think I will suspect the gamekeeper.
...Babi
BaBi
January 5, 2004 - 09:12 am
PS: Come to think of it, the "Coo-eee" could well have been Mr. McCarthy calling for help, knowing his son would respond quickly to that call.
Babi
Scrawler
January 5, 2004 - 11:24 am
"Circumstantial evidence is a very tricky thing," answered Holmes thoughtfully. "It may seem to point very straight to one thing, but if you shift your point of view a little, you may find it pointing in an equally uncompromising manner to something entirely different. It must be confessed, however, that the case looks exceedingly grave against the young man, and it is very possible he is indeed the culprit."
After reading this paragraph, I relized that even in today's world with all the CSI data, people have been convicted of a crime on "circumstantial evidence". What would it have been like in Holmes's time? I would think if you had the money to hire great lawyers you would have a fighting chance. But what about the poor? How many poor people were convicted wrongly?
"...To take the example to hand, I clearly perceive that in your bedroom the window is upon the right-side, and yet I question whether
Mr. Lestrade would have noted even so self-evident a thing as that.
My dear fellow, I know you well. I know the military neatness, which characterizes you. You shave every morning, and in this season you shave by the sunlight; but since your shaving is less and less complete as we get farther back on the left side, until it becomes positively slovenly as we get around the angle of the jaw, it is surely very clear that that side is less illuminated than the other. I could not imagine a man of your habits looking at himself in an equal light and being satisfied with such a result, I only quote this a trival example of observation and inference. Therein lies my metier, and it is just possible that it may be of some service in the investigation which lies before us."
I realize that Holmes would not be who he is without this characteristic "of oberservation" but I often wondered why the author gave it to him. Do you suppose that Doyle was actually making fun of the upper class? To the average person in Victorian times, the upper class were educated people who seemed to have a lot of information. Could it be that by making Holmes almost a "super-hero" that goes through this long explanation that Doyle created a character that did more than mirror the Victorian gentlemen in his day? It seems to me that by portraying Holmes this way and the way he describes Watson, Dole is making "class" as issue in his stories. If you lived during this period wht would you think if you read something like this, keeping in mind that these stories were written for the people rather than for the elete?
Bill H
January 5, 2004 - 03:03 pm
Yes, Horselover, I did suppose "yellow book" meant a scandalous type of literature. I believe we refer to that sort of work as tabloid rags. I arrived at this thought from AlleyKat's post #36: Was the Strand magazine a monthly publication? However, my question was answered by using the "Complete Sherlock Holmes" link, and there I found that eleven stories appeared in 1893 so The Strand Magazine was surely a monthly publication. Conan Doyle was machine in turning forth these stories.
Bill H
January 5, 2004 - 03:11 pm
I found these questions about our story on a web site. They may be useful in our discussion also.BOSCOMBE VALLEY MYSTERY
Ralph Edwards - Fri, 7 Oct 1994
Did the half hour mean it was 10:45?
Did Holmes really need Watson's help?
Why a cloak instead of a coat?
Is a person in their thirties young or middle-aged?
Why did James start back for his house?
What are platform tickets?
Why did Watson's wife want him to leave?
Was Holmes wearing a deerstalker?
Did Holmes want company or assistance? Who paid Watson's expenses?
Is "the" in "the two corner seats" meaningful?
Was it a carriage or only a compartment?
Why the reference to London papers when local papers were at hand?
Would Holmes and Watson normally be digesting their breakfast after 11:15?
Was England's murder rate high?
Were Turner and McCarthy Australian or English?
How old really was James McCarthy?
Did Patience Moran see Turner?
Where is the right hand side of one's bedroom?
Did Watson have the moustache of The Red Circle days?
Did Holmes err as to the case of the "self reproach and contrition"?
Having requested Watson's assistance, why did Holmes abandon him the first night?
Who were the serving-man and groom?
Why Petrarch rather than conversation?
Do you carry a gun if you wouldn't hurt a fly?
Why was there "the quick blush"?
Was the hideous outcry consistent with the head wound?
Would you want James to marry your daughter?
Was the cape waterproof?
Was Turner vigorous for one so ill?
Was the stone bloodied?
Did Holmes apply his blood test (from stud)? Was Turner's secret really safe?
Could McCarthy have made a convincing accusation against Turner?
What are the odds of Alice Turner and James McCarthy living happily ever after?
I did find the question "Who paid Watson's expenses" intersting. Surely Holmes paid his friends expenses in all the stories. I would suppose Sherlock Holmes charged a handsome fee for his investigations.
Bill H
FrancyLou
January 5, 2004 - 03:24 pm
I always thought Watson was there for the medical advise that was needed by Holmes. And I think he was a "partner". But that is from watching the movies. I did not read many of the mysteries.
Bill H
January 5, 2004 - 03:38 pm
Welcome, FrancyLou, happy to see you here. I believe you are right on both counts. At times Watson did give Holmes medical advise, and, yes, he was loyal partner to Sherlock.Bill H
Marvelle
January 5, 2004 - 07:10 pm
Hi, FrancyLou. Oh I hope you join in our chat. What fun this is!Anne, I don't know .... I don't think Holmes is upper class at all but rather middle class with a heck of a lot of skill and brain power. Even Jeremy Brett played him with a middle class accent.
Bill and Anne, wonderful questions. I'm going to write them down and see how many of them we can answer. I've fallen under SH's spell again thanks to Conan Doyle and look forward to this discussion with insights from all the posters.
Marvelle
horselover
January 5, 2004 - 08:29 pm
Scrawler's questions about circumstantial evidence, and whether convictions based on it were more prevalent in Holmes' time were interesting. You would think that, with all the new forensic technology available, there would be less reliance on circumstantial evidence today. But, in NY, we just recently had the convictions in the "Central Park Jogger" case overturned by DNA evidence that probably should have been made available previously.
I think Holmes would have considered himself classless--an intellectual. Many creative people don't consider themselves to be part of any class, no matter what their income. I wonder if Holmes did many cases pro bono. I imagine he would have, since it was how interesting the case was that intrigued him. Also, like lawyers, the expensive cases can cover the expenses of the others, and there is always publicity to enhance Holmes' reputation to consider.
AlleyKat
January 5, 2004 - 08:32 pm
Fancy, I found it revealing that in other stories, when Sherlock thought there would be trouble he always asks Watson to come and bring his gun. I got the distinct impression that Holmes had an aversion (perhaps that is too strong of a word)to firearms. But he relied on Watson to keep him safe, and that is a high compliment. I know that he had military training, but Doyle portrays him as a very capable man.
FrancyLou
January 5, 2004 - 11:33 pm
Yes, I agree Holmes did not like guns. Watson was pure of heart and thought - so he would not use the gun without good cause.
Bill H
January 6, 2004 - 10:03 am
"Why a cloak instead of a coat??This question was among the questions I I found on the web site, and I feel it is in keeping with the Victorian era of our story. However, when I was a kid in grade school we always hung our coats in the "cloak room." This whets my curiosity. Why is cloak used instead of coat?
Bill H
Bill H
January 6, 2004 - 11:11 am
The link I posted below will take you to the web site I found of the audio mysteries of Sherlock Holmes featuring Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce. After reaching the web site you have to scroll down about two thirds of the page and the stories listed in blue font are the audio stories, however, I did find some near the top, tooWhen you find a story you like click on the blue font this will take you to the audio page of the story. Then click on the little box beside the story to listen to it. Give it a few a few seconds to load. If you wish to download the story, right click on the little box and then click on "Save Target As…" I download it to my desktop for future listening or in order to burn it to a CD, for my audio library.
Basil Rathbone an Nigel Bruce
After Rathbone retired in 1946, Tim Conway replaced him as Sherlock Holmes. Nigel Bruce still plays Dr. Watson. There are a great number of audio Sherlock stories with Tim Conway and Nigel Bruce. Below is the link for the Conway, Bruce audios. Follow the same procedure for listening.
Tim Conway and Nigel Bruce
Bill H
BaBi
January 6, 2004 - 01:02 pm
I had forgotten about the old "cloakroom". It must have been a holdover from the days when a cloak was the more popular form of outer garment.
That was a long list of questions posted earlier. Not all are esp. relevant, but all could be interesting. For two, Holmes and Watson traveled in a compartment, and the corner seats were the window seats, and therefore preferred by many.
I never considered Doyle as doing social commentary in his stories. Holmes was a genius in his field, and that is by no means an attribute exclusive to the upper class gentleman.
We still have far too many people wrongly convicted of crimes. Even in this day of DNA, we recently had a scandal down here when it was learned that some persons were wrongly convicted because the lab testing the DNA was sloppy and careless. Not that's scary.
...Babi
Scrawler
January 6, 2004 - 02:42 pm
Crime Detection: Historical Background:
Early criminal investigation was a crude process, relying on eyewitnesses, inferences, and confessions extracted under torture. In early 19th century France the principal technique for catching thieves was obtaining evidence from informers who were engaged in crime.
The first major step in modern crime detection took place in Great Britain. In 1829 the Metropolitan Police Act established the basis for Scotland Yard detective department, which investigated crimes in London and, occasionally throughout the British Empire.
If "The Boscombe Valley Mystery" took place before 1829 this may be the reason why Lestrade was referred to as "Mr.". The fact that the crime took place outside London may also contribute to the fact that Lestrade may have been outside his jurisdiction.
Fingerprinting History:
The first recorded use of fingerprints was by the ancient Assyrians and Chinese for the signing of legal documents. Probably the first modern study of fingerprints was made by Czech physiologist Johannes Evangelista Purkinji, who in 1823 proposed a system of classification that attracted little attention. The first use of fingerprints for identification purposes was proposed late in the 19th century by the British scientist Sir Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, who wrote a detailed study of fingerprints in which he presented a new classification system using prints of all ten fingers, which is the basis of identification systems still in use. In the 1890s the police in Bengal, India, under the British police official Sir Edward Richard Henry (1857-1930), began using fingerprints to identify criminals. I wonder why "fingerprinting" took so long to catch on?
"Witness (James McCathy): I was so disturbed and excited as I rushed out into the open, that I could think of nothing except of my father. Yet I have a vague impresssion that as I ran forward something lay upon the ground to the left of me. It seemed to me to be something gray in color, a coat of some sort, or a plaid perhaps. When I rose from my father I looked around for it, but it was gone."
In the first paragraph of Crime Detection we see where the police relied on eyewitnesses. If you had heard this testimony from James McCarthy, would you call him a reliable witness? A coat that is there one moment and than is gone the next. What does that tell you? If we assume that the son didn't do the crime, could we also assume that the murderer was nearby while the son was with his father?
Marvelle
January 6, 2004 - 05:50 pm
Babi, I think genius among the British upper class isn't common. It's a compliment for Doyle to have made Sherlock Holmes middle class and for the actors to play him, accent, attitude and all, as middle class.Genius is more likely to be found in the middle class and the poor (unless they suffer from too much hardship and malnutrition). Without something to strive for, genius rarely exists - no need for it - and that's one reason why there are such few geniuses in the upper class. It can happen, but rarely and usually requires a kind of personal hardship to make them want to succeed at something, to make their mark.
I don't attribute special qualities to upper class in England except luck and circumstance in history, and an early 'plunder' mentality that created welth even if it doesn't last through the centuries. And the rich in America are usually rich because of plunder as with the timber barons and railroad tycoons and hotel magnates. Their wealth trickles down the family line to those with even less abilities than the original money-maker. Only a few, like the Apple computer whiz who I admire, make it on skill and genius without plundering natural resources and abusing disadvantaged workers for personal gain.
As you may guess, I haven't much respect for the undeservedly privileged but now I'll step down from my
soapbox. I'm thrilled Sherlock Holmes is middle class.
Marvelle
horselover
January 6, 2004 - 06:30 pm
Eye witness identification is notoriously unreliable, confessions can be coerced or manufactured, and even fingerprint identification is highly subjective depending upon how many points of identification the analyst uses. The only truly scientific evidence is DNA if the lab is reliable. But many crimes are still solved today, as in Holmes' day, by a preponderance of circumstancial evidence.
Bill H
January 6, 2004 - 06:53 pm
Gee, Marvell, I'm glad I'm not a member of the aristocracy perhaps there is a chance of me still becoming a genius )On Tuesday, we started the second half of our story so we can all feel comfortable with expressing our views on this part and the conclusion of the story.
I must say all of your posts have been excellent and the questions asked have been very good.
Bill H
Bill H
January 7, 2004 - 10:04 am
An interesting question was asked: "Did Sherlock Holmes pay Dr. Watson's expenses on these investigations?" Or did Watson pay his own way? How do you feel about this?BillH
BaBi
January 7, 2004 - 10:34 am
I have to agree, Marvelle, and I suspect most of us haven't a very high opinion of the idea that someone is 'superior' because his great granddaddy made it big.
Scrawler, yes, there had to be someone close enough to the scene of the murder, probably hidden in the nearby woods, able to slip out quickly and retrieve whatever was left behind. If it is a plaid, or tartan, that would suggest someone Scots.
I found the following excerpt on tartans:
A Brief Understanding of Tartans
Originally, the Scottish Tartan was adistinction of rank or position. It was not identified by weave but by the number of colours in the weave. If only one colour was used it depicted a servant, two, a farmer rank, three, an officer rank, five, a chieftain, six for a poet, and seven for a Chief. Eventually, clans or families adopted their own tartan, using a range of animal and earth colours which were frequently secret, only known to the weavers of the islands. They included yellows, blues, whites, greens, browns, reds, black and purple. Some say that a keen eye can identify the colour with a particular island, almost like a wine taster can identify the year and the vineyard.
I was interested to note that a single color tartan denotes a servant; two colors, a farmer; three, an officer,...etc. Since these were more modern times, a tartan appearing in the story would indicate a family/clan. Be interesting to see. ...Babi
Scrawler
January 7, 2004 - 11:48 am
"He had hardly spoken before there rushed into the room one of the most lovely young women that I have ever seen in my life. Her violet eyes shining, her lips parted, a pink flush upon her cheeks, all though of her natural reserve lost in her overpowering excitement and concern.
"Oh, Mr. Sherlock Homes!" she cried, glancing from one to the other of us, and finally, with a woman's quick intuition, fastening upon my companion..."
What do you think of this description of Miss Turner? Do you think it is an accurate description of a Victorian woman?
I don't know about you, but I see a whole other side to Watson as he gives this detailed description of the woman from her "violet eyes shining, her lips parted, a pink flush upon her cheeks". I wonder what his wife would think if she heard him say these things?
"Clearly such a blow must have been struck from behind. That was to some extent in favour of the accused, as when seen quarreling he was face to face with his father. Still, it did not go for very much, for the older man might have turned his back before the blow fell. Then there was the peculiar dying refernce to a rat. What could that mean? It could not be delirium. A man dying from a sudden blow does not commonly become delirious. No, it was more likely to be an attempt to explain how he met his fate. But what could it indicate? I cudgelled my brains to find some possible explanation. And then the incident of the gray cloth seen by young McCarthy. If that were true the murderer must have dropped some part of his dress, presumably his overcoat, in his flight, and must have had the hardihood to return and to carry it away at the instant when the son was kneeling with his back turned not a dozen paces off. What a tissue of mysteries and improbabilities the whole thing was!"
Based on the clues above could you come up with a picture of the supposed "murderer" assuming the son didn't do the crime? Was he a large, strong man? Could he be clever and sly? Could a woman have committed the crime? If the father was hit on the head where is the evidence? And what did the dying man mean by his reference to "rat"? Any ideas?
I like the sentence "I cudgelled my brains to find some posible explanation." Also, "What a tissue of mysteries and improbabilities the whole thing was!" What imagery!
horselover
January 7, 2004 - 01:54 pm
Watson probably could afford to pay his own way, but I think that, when Holmes was getting a fee, he would most likely pay both their expenses.
Victorian women enhanced the "pink flush" on their cheeks, just as some women do today. They also enhanced the redness of their lips, but not with the bright colors of lipstick today.
What do you think about Holmes' display of legal talents at trial of McCarthy? "James McCarthy was acquitted at the assizes, on the strength of a number of objections which had been drawn out by Holmes, and submitted to the defending counsel." This shows another instance of Holmes' brilliance in almost every area.
Do you all agree with Holmes' decision about how to handle Turner's confession? Turner was, after all, a fugitive from justice who had made his fortune in England with ill-gotten gains. Turner says, "I give you my word that I would have spoken out if it went against him at Assizes." But he was deathly ill and could have died at any moment, taking the secret with him. I think both Holmes and Turner were trying to protect the daughter, and fortunately in this case, all ended well.
What did Holmes mean when, as Turner leaves, he says,"There, but for the grace of God, goes Sherlock Holmes." Did he mean that he might have used his talents in criminal enterprises if circumstances were different? Or that all us "poor helpless worms" are subject to the winds of fate?
Bill H
January 7, 2004 - 03:36 pm
Horselover,I did not agree with Holmes' decision to conceal the confession until after Turner died. Today and, I suppose then, that action would have been considered concealing information or obstruction of justice.
"There but for the grace of God, goes Sherlock Holmes." I think Holmes meant that if had a daughter and found himself in a similar circumstance he would probably do the same thing as Turner. I took "…his display of legal talent…"to mean Holmes turned over the evidence he gathered to the defending counsel, however, that would only display his brilliance as a detective.
I thought the ending was very shallow. I realize it was a short story but Conan Doyle ended it too abruptly.
"and must have had the hardihood to return and to carry it away at the instant when the son was kneeling with his back turned not a dozen paces off…"
Scrawler,
I'm glad you brought that out. When I read the above I found it very hard to swallow. The only thing that might make this action credible is the old man's illness. Turner may have thought, "What the heck it's worth the chance even if he sees me I've nothing too lose, and I accomplished what I wanted…." This is my quote not Turner's or the author's
BaBi,
What you told us about tartans was interesting. I suppose various colors could also show what clans one belonged to.
Bill H
horselover
January 7, 2004 - 06:12 pm
Bill, I got the impression that Holmes did more than turn over evidence; it seemed as though he actually outlined some lines of defense for him.
I do like your suggestion that Holmes thought that, if he had a daughter, he might have acted the same as Turner. It made me think about the loss of all those brilliant genes from an evolutionary standpoint. Do you think Holmes might have had any "illigitimate" children?
If anyone is visiting the area:
The Gold Museum
This interesting museum houses a large collection of gold nuggets found at Ballarat, as well as alluvial deposits, gold ornaments, and coins. There are also gallery displays relating to the history of gold mining in the area.
Bill H
January 7, 2004 - 06:27 pm
Friday will end our Boscombe Valley Mystery discussion. If you have more thoughts regarding the entire story, its conclusion, A. Conan Doyle, or the discussion in general, the next two days will be your chance to express your feeling. Bill H
Scrawler
January 8, 2004 - 01:38 pm
"It was with his barmaid wife that he had spent the last three days in Bristol, and his father did not know where he was. Mark that point. It is of importance. Good has come out of evil, however, for the barmaid, finding from the papers that he is in serious trouble and likely to be hanged, has thrown him over utterly and his written to him to say that she has a husband already in Bermuda Dockyard, so that there is really no tie between them."
Was Doyle in describing the "barmaid" in this fashion declaring his own feeling toward class? Or was this just the description of a charcter that came from the imagination of the author. It certainly is convenient for the young man and the story.
"Sherlock Holmes was transformed when he was hot upon such a scent as this. Men who had only known the quiet thinker and logician of Baker Street would have failed to recognize him. His face flushed and darkened. His brows were drawn into two hard black lines, while his eyes shone out from beneath them with a steely glitter. His face was bent downward, his shoulders bowed, his lips compressed, and the veins stood out like whipcord in his long, sinewy neck. His nostrils semed to dilate with a purely animal lust for the chase, and his mind was so absolutely concentrated upon the matter before him that a question or remark fell unheeded upon his ears, or, at the most, only provoked a quick, impatient snarl in reply. Swiftly and silently he made his way along the track which ran through the meadows, and so by way of the woods to the Boscombe Pool. It was damp, marshy ground, as is all that district, and there were marks of many feet, both upon the path and amid the short grass which bounded it on either side. Sometimes Holmes would hurry on, sometimes stop dead, and once he made quite a little detour into the meadow. Lestrade and I walked behind him, the detective indifferent and contemptuous, while I watched my friend with the interest which sprang from the conviction that every one of his actions directed towards a definite end."
This is Holmes at his best. But I can't help wonder if the Holmes' persona goes a little over board with his detecting abilities.
Sidney Paget used his brother as a model for the detective in his illustrations for "The Strand". It was in the fourth story, "The Boscombe Valley Mystery," that Holmes was seen for the first time in what has become in the popular mind his standard uniform: the deerstalker cap and Inverness Coat. Paget drew this outfit based on what Dr. Watson described as a "long-grey travelling-coat and close-fitting cloth cap."
BaBi
January 8, 2004 - 01:49 pm
It seems apparent that Mr. Turner's exceptional generosity to McCarthy, and McCarthy's pushing of a marriage that Turner disapproved, is nothing less than on-going blackmail. Hardly surprising that Turner's nervous system is shattered. And now with McCarthy trying to force a marriage on Turner's daughter, Turner becomes my prime suspect.
The description of Sherlock Holmes on the hunt puts me in mind of a bloodhound. (After two unsuccessful attempts to copy and paste the passage, I gave it up.)
...Babi
Bill H
January 8, 2004 - 03:00 pm
ScrawlerThank you for that information about Sydney Paget I particularly liked learning that Paget used his brother for a model. His illustrations are superb and alone are worth the price of any Sherlock Holmes book. . Interesting what all we learn from a book discussion.
BiBi
I, too, found that description of Holmes on the hunt worthy of note. However, I got the impression that Watson had just given him the needle ) As in, "Quick, Watson, the needle." I sometimes wonder if Sherlock's keen power of observation stemmed from his use of stimulants.
Ginny
January 8, 2004 - 03:23 pm
It's really funny that once you hear of something then it seems to crop up continually, today coming home in the car, listening to my tape of Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce in the old radio shows Adventure of the Coptic Compass I was startled to hear them mention the Boscombe Valley Mystery which I thought I had never heard of hahahaha. Just thought I'd mention the coincidence.
I think I'll light a fire and watch one of the old Rathbone movies, so fun.
ginny
Bill H
January 8, 2004 - 03:41 pm
Ginny, Sounds good, Ginny, and if it is as cold where you live as it is here you will need that fire. In one of my recent posts I gave a link to a web site that you can click on and listen to the old time radio programs of Raithbone and Watson. Like I said, I copy them to the desk top and then burn them to a disc. I just listened to the "Bruce Parkinton Plans" done by Raithbone and Bruce. So good listening to those two once more. I even enjoyed the annonucer describing what "Groves bromo quinine tablets" can do for a cold ) I believe this program had a date of 1940.
Bill H
Bill H
January 8, 2004 - 03:55 pm
Among the questions I found on the web (by Ralph Edwards) were these two.
l. Would you want James to marry your daughter?
2. What are the odds of Alice Turner and James McCarthy living happily ever after?
What are your thoughts on these two questions?
One of the readers asked: Did Sherlock have illegitimate children? Well, in the novel "A Scandal in Bohemia" Watson writes
"TO SHERLOCK HOLMES she is always the woman. I have seldom heard him mention her under any other name. In his eyes she eclipses and predominates the whole of her sex. It was not that he felt any emotion akin to love for Irene Adler. All emotions, and that one particularly, were abhorrent to his cold, precise but admirably balanced mind. He was, I take it, the most perfect reasoning and observing machine that the world has seen, but as a lover he would have placed himself in a false position. He never spoke of the softer passions, save with a gibe and a sneer. They were admirable things for the observer–excellent for drawing the veil from men’s motives and actions. But for the trained reasoner to admit such intrusions into his own delicate and finely adjusted temperament was to introduce a distracting factor which might throw a doubt upon all his mental results"
This seems to preclude his having illegitimate children. Perhaps that rumor was spread by Sherlock's old nemesis Professor Moriarity. Maybe Moriarity wanted to pretend he was Sherlock's son )
Irene AdlerI suppose the above illsustration was alos by Sydney Paget, but George Hutchinson also did illustrations for these stories.
Bill H
Bill H
January 8, 2004 - 04:45 pm
A bit more about George Hutchinson. In the book I have here is an introduction of the illustrations. "About The Illustrations".
"The intriguing illustrations for A Study in Scarlet included here are by George Hutchinson and came from the 1891 Ward, Lock & bowden (London) edition Although they predate the famous Sidney Paget illustrations and were the first excellent pictorial representations of Holmes, they are rarely reprinted today.
There is a charm, wit, and humanity to these drawings that makes this hsard to understand…."
Bill H
Bill H
January 9, 2004 - 01:11 pm
Today ends our discussion of the "Boscombe Valley Mystery." I thank all of you who participated in the discussion. Your thoughtful posts made this a successful discussion and they proved a mystery story can be discussed intelligently in a short time frame as this story was. I don't think this was one of Doyle's better Sherlock stories. First, I don't believe Doyle knew what direction he wanted to go with Lestrade. In the beginning of the story it was Mr. Lestrade followed by Inspector Lestrade. Doyle Had him "retained" instead of being sent by Scotland Yard. Then the cover up of the "confession." by Holmes and the recovery of the garment by Mr. Turner only a few feet from were James McCarthy knelt by his father's body without James either hearing or seeing him. Hard to Swallow. But it did make for fun reading.
I'm sure that after this discussion I'll be reading the Sherlock stories with a much more thoughtful viewpoint. I' shall be watching for meaningful clues presented to us by Conan Doyle.
Again, many thank to all of you for making this a great discussion. I hope we can soon do it again with another mystery author.
Bill H
Scrawler
January 9, 2004 - 01:13 pm
It is difficult to imagine the shape which detective fiction might have taken had it not been for the creation by Arthur Conan Doyle of Sherlock Holmes. Conan Doyle took a form of fiction, which had become popular through the works of his predessor, Edgar Allan Poe, and reshaped it, adding elements, which made his own contributions among the most popular fiction of all time.
The Gothic novel, the Newgate novel, even the so-called Penny Dreadful, contained elements of mystery, suspense, and horror, which set the stage for what Poe, called the tale of ratiocination. A few years later, the French-writer Gaboriau used some of these same elements in his novels, collectively referred to as his "romans policiers," but which the growing number of followers came to call the mystery or detective story. In "A Study in Scarlet" (1888) Sherlock Holmes disparages both of these writers, but only because his creator wished to add personality to his character. In reality, the author was among the greatest admirers of both Poe and Gaboriau.
So great is the influence of Sherlock Holmes, that only the truest of the great detective's fans know that creator, Arthur Conan Doyle, thought far less of Holmes than he did of his other creative efforts. For Doyle was not a stock-in-trade mystery writer. He certainly had not "invented" the genre of detective fiction, a privilege that belonged to Egar Allan Poe and his own creation, master detective August Dupin. Although Doyle claimed that Holmes had been modeled on his medical school teacher, Dr. Joseph Bell, the writings of Edgar Allan Poe, as well as Emile Gaboriau, Charles Dickens, Eugene Vidocq, and Willkie Collins, were what provided Doyle with the basic elements for building his mythic detective.
Doyle's detective fared quite well in the United States, when a request for another story about the master detective was made to Doyle while he was deep in his next historical novel, "The White Company" (1890). As soon as Doyle had completed "The White Company," which was to be his personal favorite, he dashed off "The Sign of Four" (1890) which was, once again, well received in America. In July 1891 Doyle wrote his first of six Sherlock Holmes tales for "The Strand", making Doyle England's most popular serialized fiction writer. Doyle continued to write Sherlock Holmes stories over the next two years until he decided to have Holmes killed by his arch-nemesis, Dr. Moriarty, in December 1893, with the story "The Final Problem". Doyle's decision was a momentous one. Holmes' death was met with howls of outrage and large-scale subscription cancellations of the magazine. The pressure on Doyle was enormous to continue the series, but he was adamant about letting Holmes rest in peace. As it was, the production of a Holmes story for serial publication proved to be an enormous strain on Doyle's creative powers. However, in 1901, Doyle published "The Hound of the Baskervilles," in which Holmes was reintroduced to solve one of his older cases.
Thanks for a great discussion. Let's do it again soon - maybe a Poe story!
Marvelle
January 9, 2004 - 01:28 pm
It was a great discussion, Bill and all Sherlockians. I've resolved to read the SH stories in the order in which they were written so I might follow the progression of the characters. The Heritage Press books I have list them in chronological order as I think many editions do.Sorry I stopped posting but have been down with the flu since Tuesday and still not fully recovered. I get a headache trying to read (so no books or computer) and a headache through slight noise (so no television or radio). Will be better in a day or so and plan to go back and read all the great posts here.
See you all in 'Classical Mysteries'.
Marvelle
Bill H
January 9, 2004 - 01:31 pm
ScrawlerThank you for that great post(s)! It was so informative. I'm sorry you missed the Poe discussion we had a few months ago. I'm sure you would've enjoyed it. We had a lot of fun in that discussion with the Ape. The story was The Murder in the Rue Morgue. Thank you for your contribution to this discussion.
Bill H
Bill H
January 9, 2004 - 01:34 pm
MarvelleSorry to hear you have the flu. I believe I picked up some kind of an intestinal virus a few days ago, although it seems to be subsiding now. I hope! Thank you for your contributions to this discussion.
To all old time mystery lovers, don't forget to join us in
Classical Mysteries
Bill H
Marjorie
January 10, 2004 - 09:01 pm
This discussion is being archived and is now Read Only.