Moveable Feast, A ~ Ernest Hemingway ~ 9/04
patwest
August 2, 2004 - 12:52 pm
Welcome
to A Moveable Feast by Ernest Hemingway
"Paris On our Mind!" Some of us are completing the "Paris 1919" discussion, and I thought it might be cool to linger in Paris for a second view. Of course "Paris 1919" concerned the writing of the peace Treaty ending WW I; now we can return to the city with a quite different set of characters, pursuing vastly different goals. These are Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Gertrude Stein, Ezra Pound, and other great and near great giants of 20th century culture in their formative years living in 1920's Paris.
|
Comments, Schedule and Focus Questions
Week 4 (Conclusion) Sept 28 – Oct 3rd Chapters 19 – 20 pp 187 – 211
First, the board is open for any further concluding comment any one may care to make on any part of the book.
Second, What are your conclusions regarding this book? In particular do you consider it a non-fiction Memoir or a fictional rewriting of the actual experience of living historical characters? In other words did you read it as non-fiction or fiction? Was Hemingway fair to his old friends and associates in his writing about them after most were dead and unable to answer?
Links To Hemingway On The Web
|
Discussion Leader: Harold
B&N Bookstore | Books Main Page | Suggest a Book for Discussion
We sometimes excerpt quotes from discussions to display on pages on SeniorNet's site or in print documents.
If you do NOT wish your words quoted, please Contact Books
Harold Arnold
August 2, 2004 - 12:08 pm
This is a delightful little book only 200 pages long. Everyone is welcome to join! I think this is a natural for those of you who have participated in "Paris 1919" as well as the many others who have read the works of Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Stein and Pound, etc and now want to read something of their formative years in Paris in the 1920's.
Here we get a different view of Paris through the eyes of a vastly different cast of characters just a few years later. Please indicate your participation with a post here indicating that you will join the discussion. As always we will need at least 4 or preferably more to make this discussion a reality.
Everyone is welcome! I hope to see you here Sept 7th.
Ella Gibbons
August 2, 2004 - 02:02 pm
Sounds delightful, Harold. Do you know I have never read any of Hemingway's books and before I get much older I'd best be at it. I'll join in if I possibly can.
MountainRose
August 2, 2004 - 06:41 pm
. . . one and you've given me the perfect excuse.
Scamper
August 2, 2004 - 06:56 pm
I'll be here!
Pamela
Harold Arnold
August 2, 2004 - 07:39 pm
Well thankk you Ella, Mountain Rose and Pamela. Ella, I'll bet you have seen the movies from some of the Hemingway books, like "A Farewell to Arms" (a real tear jerker), "The Sun Also Rises," and of Course "For Whome the Bells Toll." I think also their was a Film of "The Old Man and the Sea" and I bet others that I can't think of right now.
We still need at least a couple more and preferbly another half dozen plus. Cone on in!
Joan Grimes
August 2, 2004 - 09:02 pm
This is my favorite book in all the world. I really mean that. It is a lovely book about a lovely city. I will try to find my book and participate in this one.
Joan
Scrawler
August 3, 2004 - 05:13 pm
I love Hemingway, although sometimes I don't understand what he says. I'll be there with bells on. And don't ask me who they toll for.
Harold Arnold
August 3, 2004 - 08:25 pm
Thank you Joan and scrawler for your interest. I think this book will make a great discussion that we all will enjoy. Will see both of you here Sep 7th.
KleoP
August 4, 2004 - 10:20 pm
At this point, I've read so much about the characters of the era that it will be fun and lightweight to discuss it. Pamela, does this mean I can count on you to lead the discussion of A Moveable Feast when we cover it in our book club? Be easier than Faulkner!
Kleo
Harold Arnold
August 5, 2004 - 12:08 pm
I appreciate the announcement of your coming participation. The discussion of this type of book is a bit different for me, but I have always had a great respect for Hemingway having read several of his books and seen others as movies. I look forward to this discussion and your participation.
Ginney10306
August 5, 2004 - 12:33 pm
I read too slowly to keep up,I'll give it a try!My cousin just finished "Eat,shoots and leaves. She has promised to send it to me.
Harold Arnold
August 5, 2004 - 05:12 pm
Ginny reads slowly, I find that hard to believe! Anyone who reads as much as you do (leading 6 + major Books discussion a year plus much more) has to be fast. Are the storms over in the Carolinas?
Harold Arnold
August 6, 2004 - 07:03 pm
Ginny10306 sorry for my mistake, but as my old 3rd grade elementary school teacher at the Eugene Field school on the near south side of Houston use to scream, “HAROLD, YOU’VE JUST GOT TO LEARN TO PAY ATTENTION!” Though your sign-in is unique, when I saw Ginny I took you for our popular books host who is a mentor for us all.
Ginny10306 , for certain, you will be welcome in the “Moveable Feast discussion. Please do come in on the opening day, Sept 7th.
Jo Ann Walter
August 16, 2004 - 03:38 pm
This book sounds interesting. I have not joined a book discussion group before. I'm not sure how it works but willing to try.
Harold Arnold
August 17, 2004 - 04:47 pm
I think this little book is a great place to start. Just join in on Sept 7th. We are very informal and welcome the opportunity to hear your interpretation of the book. We also welcome your comments on the comments and interpretations of others.
This proposal has definitely made its Quorum. I have left it here on the proposed menue since I felt it was more visible to pick up additional participants. I will now ask that it be moved to the Coming Book Discussion menu.
IT IS STILL OPEN FOR OTHER SENIOR NETTERS INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING.
MountainRose
August 18, 2004 - 02:08 pm
. . . read it while sitting next to a creek with my toes in the water. Lovely little book with interesting details about both Paris at that time and the personalities involved. Can't wait to hear what you all have to say about it.
Harold Arnold
August 19, 2004 - 07:53 am
Way to go Mountain Rose!
Ann Alden
August 19, 2004 - 10:21 am
Cool??? is that you, Harold?? LOL
I just got "The Moveable Feast" from my library yesterday and then remembered that we are leaving on a 2 weeks vacation on the 7th so I guess I won't be joining you for that discussion unless you are still open when we return.
talbaladejo
August 20, 2004 - 11:21 am
Please, can you tell me the English title of the last chapter of "A Moveable feast? Thank you very much.
Tomas
MountainRose
August 20, 2004 - 11:55 am
"There Is Never Any End to Paris"
Gail Norma
August 21, 2004 - 09:40 am
Hi: Please add me to the list for one of my favorite books. I love Hemingway and if I could come back to life in another time as another person, I would choose to be Ernest Hemingway. Some people find that odd as I am female.........guess I am in love with his whole life-style, his personality, his adventures, his romances.......
See you all soon.
Gail/VT
Harold Arnold
August 22, 2004 - 07:33 am
Your name is on the list. We begin Sept 7th. Anyone else?
Malryn (Mal)
August 22, 2004 - 08:54 am
I'll be here, HAROLD.
Mal
Harold Arnold
August 23, 2004 - 08:50 am
Great to have you aboard. join us Sept 7th. Anyone else?
Scrawler
August 23, 2004 - 01:03 pm
That's Matt Hemingway, a relative of Ernest Hemingway. He won silver in the high jump. I think Ernest would have been proud of the young man, even though Matt said he didn't inherit Ernest Hemingway's writing ability; he did say he "dabbles" a bit in it.
If I haven't said it, I'm really looking forward to this discussion.
See you all soon.
Harold Arnold
August 23, 2004 - 01:49 pm
Thank you Scrawler for mentioning the relationship. I noticed the name Hemingway last evening while the event was in progress but did not stay around to hear the end. What is the Relationship? Something like great Grand son? The Actress Mariel Hemingway was a great grand daughter.
Scrawler
August 24, 2004 - 01:40 pm
If I remember correctly, I think Hemingway said Ernest Hemingway was his great grandfather from Hemingway's first wife.
Joan Grimes
August 25, 2004 - 05:56 am
60 years ago today Paris was liberated from the German Occupation. It seems that Hemingway had his own party at the Ritz the next day. To read about it click on
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2004/08/22/TRGCP8A4VP1.DTL Joan Grimes
Harold Arnold
August 25, 2004 - 07:28 am
that is one good story! I had no idea Hemingway was that involved in Normandy, even though his involvment seems more a drinking experience than a military one. Everyone should read this San Francisco Chronicle story linked by Joan in the previous post.
Scamper
August 25, 2004 - 11:55 am
I think the young athelete Hemingway's grandfather was Ernest's brother...
I'm here also for the Sept. read,
Pamela
KleoP
August 25, 2004 - 04:03 pm
Hi, Pamela! I think this might prove more fun that the Stern. Well, it will be easier to read.
Kleo
Harold Arnold
August 25, 2004 - 04:42 pm
Pamela & Kleo, did you see the Ernest Hemingway quote in the Margaret Macmillan “Paris 1919”book. It is on Page 452, a quote from a Toronto Newspaper article by Hemingway in 1922 describing the Greek army evacuation from its intervention in Turkish Thrace”
All day long I have been passing them, dirty, tired, unshaven, wind bitten-soldiers, hiking along the trails across the brown, rolling, barren Thrace countryside. No bands, no relief organizations, no leave areas, nothing but lice, dirty blankets, and mosquitoes at night. They are the last of the glory that was Greece. This is the end of their second siege of Troy.
Jim Kittelberger
August 27, 2004 - 05:41 am
what time on the 7th does it all get started? I've leafed through the book before, but this would be a good time to actually read it. I have never been to one of these discussions but I think I would like to try it. See you then.
Harold Arnold
August 27, 2004 - 09:01 am
Thank you for your interest; we particularly welcome first time Books discussion participants. Here is how a discussion works:
First, book discussions are not a real-time chat. Rather they are continuously open for participant reading and posting throughout the scheduled period. In this case the discussion will begin on Sept 7, the day after the US Labor day holiday and will end Sept 30. Prior to the beginning date I will announce a schedule likely bunching chapters in three weekly packets (six or seven short chapters a week). The remaining several days will be available for conclusions and participant’s assessment of the book.
Beginning Sept 7th, participants should read each post and post their own comments concerning the scheduled chapters. These comments might concern a particular discussion thread initiated by the DL or another participant, or they might be the initiation of a new discussion thread. The post might be in the form of a question asking others for their thoughts on a particular discussion point, or it might be your answer to a question raised by another. Also a participant’s personal opinion, thoughts or comment on any one of the many great and near-great characters including a participants knowledge from other sources are welcome.
In short these discussions are very informal and any socially proper comment relating to the book or comments just drawn from the book are welcome. I suggest you
Click Here and browse the archived “Will” discussion. This was a short discussion last winter of the G. Gordon Liddy book. The actual discussion began Jan 31 with message #56. If you browse the messages from #56 to the conclusion you will see how our discussions unfold.
I hope you will join us.
Jo Ann Walter
August 27, 2004 - 04:06 pm
I really enjoyed the book: Hemingway's Paris by Robt. Gajdusek. It has marvelous pictures of Paris in it. I see that I bought it in 1985 but I bet its still out there.
Harold Arnold
August 27, 2004 - 06:56 pm
The B&N catalog lists by Robert yy Robert E. Gajduskey a book entitled
Hemingway In His Own Country Its not cheap at $65.00 for the hard cover or $22.00 for the paperback.
Also listed is
Hemingway's Paris and Pamplona by Robert F. Burgess. This title was prblished in 2000 and is in the catalog at $22.95.
Is one of these the book you remember?
Jo Ann Walter
August 28, 2004 - 04:08 pm
No, Harold, those are different books. If you look on the Alibris book site and type in the ISBN #, they have some copies for around $10.99 used. The ISBN # is: 0-684-17785-4. This is the unique Library of Congress #. The book has great illustrations. It has quotes from his books, including A Moveable Feast and other writers of that era. This site carries a lot of interesting book titles.
Harold Arnold
September 5, 2004 - 08:28 pm
On Tuesday we will begin the discussion. I think this book divides comfortably into three weekly parts. The first will be Chapter 1 through 6, pp 1 –59. For each of the next two weeks we will take in turn packets of 7 chapter each leaving about 4 days at the end for our individual conclusions.
You will notice I have put three focus points in the heading proposing the discussion be directed to three prinicipal fronts- the Hemingway’s themselves, Paris the City, and the Great and near great expatriates with whom the Hemingway’s circulated, in this first week principally Gertrude Stein.
This is an easy and interesting book to read. I encourage all to post their comments and thoughts on the book and or the other messages that have been posted by others. Hope to see all of you Tuesday.
Harold Arnold
September 6, 2004 - 08:32 pm
Its now approaching midnight in the East and I judge it close enough to go ahead and declare the board open for posts.
I have always liked Hemingway as a writer and I have read several of his novels and many of his short stories. Also of course I have seen the movie versions of at least three of his stories. The ones that quickly come to mind are “ For Whom the Bells Toll.” “A Farewell to Arms,” and the “Snows of Kilimanjaro.” The latter story was originally just a short story (
Click Here for a Web reading). I remember there was a Modern Library Giant Edition of his short stories that is still on my book shelves today.
In “A Movable Feast” Hemingway does not tell us much about the background facts that brought him to Paris in 1922. In my case I knew he had been an ambulance driver volunteer in Italy during WW I. We know from the book he was married to a girl named Hadley and he seemed rather well connected but not financially well provided for. The Links I have posted fill in some of the details Hemingway did not tell us, including the fact that Hadley’s last name was Richardson, and they had married in Sept 1921 and left for Paris in December of that year. So that seems to explain, how they got to Paris.
One of the guests at the Richardson/Hemingway wedding was Sherwood Anderson, the writer who seems to have been a sort of mentor to the young Hemingway. It was Andersons through his letters of introduction to Gertrude Stein and other notables in Paris that gave Hemingway easy access to the Paris connections.
In the first six chapters of the Book we see much of Ernest and a bit of Hadley, but nowhere near as much of Hadley as of Ernest. We see Hemingway working alone much of the time. If I am interpreting the writing correctly Hemingway rented a room on the walk-up 6th floor of a cold left-bank building where he would go to write. I have the idea this is not the rooms where he and Hadley lived.
Hemingway also would write in some rather seedy cafes like the unpleasant Bar of the first chapter where he wrote, “Up in Michigan.” Most often we see Hemingway working, walking, eating alone or with others. Perhaps Hadley too had her special friends and was involved with her own agenda elsewhere, but the book does not tell us this. I guess maybe, I’m not surprised Hadley was not the last Mrs Hemingway.
Joan Grimes
September 7, 2004 - 08:07 am
Good Morning Harold,
Hemingway wanted to enlist in the army during WWI, however he had problems with his eyesight.Since his eyesight prevented his enlistment, He drove an ambulance for the Red Cross near the Italian front. He was wounded on July 8, 1918 and spent months in hospital .
sort of a local hero in his hometowUpn. Inn 1921, he met, and married Hadley Richardson of St. Louis. Sherwood Anderson advised him to go to Paris; so the couple went to live in Paris.Hemingway was working for the Toronto Star;however they were also living off Hadley's inheritance.
I think that Hemingway was so taken with Paris and this new exciting existence socializing with this new circle of friends that he selfishly left Hadley out of all his descriptions of his life in Paris. I think that Hemingway was a very selfish man at all times of his life. The fact that he eventually committed suicide is, to me , the prime example of his selfishness.
I have alot to say about Paris, as I have visited there many times but will make those comments later in the discussion.
Joan Grimes
Jim Kittelberger
September 7, 2004 - 08:40 am
I've read the first three chapters(?) so far. I have read a couple of Hemingways books prior to this. So far the most memorable passages are of the sanitary conditions in Paris. Ahh the lovely old country.
Malryn (Mal)
September 7, 2004 - 08:44 am
I've been in Paris once -- thirty years ago. My husband was there on business and was gone every day, so I spent a good deal of time alone in that city. Had some adventures on my own, too, in a place where I thought I knew the language before I left home, and discovered after I got there that I didn't.
Though I've read this book before, I haven't read much of it this time yet, and this time it's different. Hemingway hit me with what he says about writing about Michigan while sitting in a café in Paris.
"I had already seen the end of fall come through boyhood, youth and young manhood, and in one place you could write about it better than another. This was called transplanting yourself, I thought. . . ." (Page 5)
Yes, I've written about Massachusetts, where I grew up, better in Florida and North Carolina than I ever could have if I had been there."The story was writing itself and I was having a hard time keeping up with it." (Page 6)
I know this feeling very well.
We stayed in an unfashionable small hotel on a side street, recommended to us by a French man who worked for my husband -- maybe as a joke? The walls were thin, and the sound of French lovemaking in adjoining rooms was part of the experience. The highlight of that hotel stay was one afternoon when I heard the most gorgeous soprano voice, just across the courtyard between the buildings, singing an aria that I had sung many times before.
The first meal I had in Paris was in a café I found half a block from the hotel. I couldn't translate the menu, so pointed at something. What the waiter brought to me was the French equivalent of hot dogs and Boston Baked Beans. They must have seen me coming!
Mal
MountainRose
September 7, 2004 - 10:04 am
the bad weather." came as complete shock to me, and as the paragraph went on we get to see that bleak, poor, and dirty side of Paris. In my imaginings of Paris, that was the side I had completely ignored, but of course I know it's there because I grew up in places in Europe that were similar.
I imagine for wealthy people Paris was a comfortable place to live, and the public places were lovely where even the poor could go, but to share a bathroom down the hall, have no elevator to the sixth floor, to be cold in winter, and often be hungry, is not what I would call pleasant living.
So what made Paris so special during those times? I think it was the intellectual life, the ferment of talk about art and writing and music. I did, however, notice that Ernest doesn't mention that he met many French intellectuals; so I'm assuming it was a closely-knit group of expatriates who influenced each other in a foreign country. That can be very cozy if one collects the right sort of people for the group. They may be eccentric and difficult personalities, as artistic people often are, but the talk must have been stimulating.
MountainRose
September 7, 2004 - 10:09 am
. . . I did wonder why she wasn't more part of the book. It's as if she was a sideline to him, there when he wanted her, but otherwise ignored. She was even ignored by Stein as "just a wife" who didn't deserve being included in the conversation. But she came across as a very sweet, loving, tolerant person, and I wished he had said more about her.
On the other hand, I do think artists, whether writers, painters, composers, etc., need much time alone to pursue their art, and sometimes other people really are just a sideline. An artist who is consumed with his/her art has no emotional room for other people's needs, and they do tend to be selfish---although there are exceptions. I agree with Joan that Hemmingway was particularly selfish. He was a man's man, doing and writing about manly things, in which there was little room for the female or female psychology in any sort of 3-dimensional way.
Jo Ann Walter
September 7, 2004 - 10:48 am
I have owned this book for several years and enjoyed reading it again. Its kind of a toss-up of which was more interesting, Hemingway or his writing. I do love his ability to paint "word pictures", like: "You expected to be sad in the fall. Part of you died each year when the leaves fell from the trees and their branches were bare against the wind and the cold, wintry light. But you knew there would always be the spring, as you knew the river would flow again after it was frozen."
KleoP
September 7, 2004 - 10:59 am
When Hemingway committed suicide he had been very ill. He was in a major plane crash in Africa, almost died, had a major internal illness and would probably have lived not much longer had he not suicided.
Suicide is evil and intented to inflict hurt on the survivors. Hemingway's suicide, when I read about his last days in great detail, did not strike me as an evil act or an act intended to hurt the loved ones left behind. You might want to read about it in detail before deciding.
Yes, he was a man's man. But, dang, he liked the ladies and they sure liked him back.
Kleo
MountainRose
September 7, 2004 - 11:22 am
. . . shows a picture of Hadley and also the exterior of the building in which they lived:
http://www.lostgeneration.com/paris.htm And here is a site that begins with Stein's quote about "the lost generation". I found that quote interesting, but not sure that I agree with it. What do you all think?
http://www.pbs.org/hemingwayadventure/lost_gen.html
MountainRose
September 7, 2004 - 12:39 pm
. . . above, I think Stein was full of herself and really not a very important writer as far as history has declared. She was full of ego, probably very intelligent, but overrated her own talent.
She probably not only gave Hemmingway a warm haven with good things to eat, but also guided him about art and the expatriates in Paris at the time, and writers he should read. As to her writing advice, I notice he listened to her but then ignored what she said.
Her word of "inaccrochable" was something she made up, at least that's how it comes across to me --- that his writing should be "inaccrochable". I'm not exactly sure what she meant by that except that a work of art had to be "socially acceptable" in her estimation???? One does not hang one of Goya's paintings of torture on a living room wall??? What did you all get from that word? What did she mean?
Malryn (Mal)
September 7, 2004 - 02:31 pm
I am finding that this book is not only a description of life in Paris; it is a remarkable aid to writers. (Pages 12-13)
"I always worked (wrote) until I had something done and I always stopped when I knew what was going to happen next. That way I could be sure of going on the next day. . . .
But sometimes when I could not get it going . . . . I would think, 'Do not worry. You have always written before and you will write now. All you have to do is write one true sentence. Write the truest sentence that you know. . . . So finally I would write one true sentence, and go on from there. . . . .there was always one true sentence that I knew or had seen or had heard someone say. . . . Up in that room I decided that I would write one story about each thing that I knew about. I was trying to do this all the itme I was writing, and it was good and severe discipline."
Let's face it. Writers are selfish with their time and themselves. If they weren't, they'd never get any writing done, and the world would suffer a terrible loss.
Mal
Harold Arnold
September 7, 2004 - 06:02 pm
Thank all of you for your Response. This Tuesday was an awkward day for me as I always have Tuiesday afternoon as a work day at the local National Historical Park and to day I had a morning must do chore that took me away early.
Jim and Mal have mentioned the primitive nature of the sanitary facilities in the period Paris hotels. Not only that, I would add the cafes and restaurants and even the food and drinking water. Is that why wine was so popular? And the thought of eating fish caught in the urban Seine leaves me wondering. Violent attacks of the “grippers” must have been a common experience.
I see from the posts that at least two of you have been to Paris and did and plan to comment on its culture and Hemingway’s experience living there. I have never been to Paris but I have made many visit\s to the US center of French-American culture, New Orleans. I no doubt will be inclined to inject my comparative experience there.
Thank you Mal and Joan for your Paris experience. Noise in hotels can certainly be annoying. This is particularly true of old hotels I remember one in Biloxi, MS, another French-American city that pretty well duplicated the Paris Hotel described by Mal (except it was probably smaller) and some of the lodgings mentioned by Hemingway. Obviously many of these were certain firetraps particularly the one I sometimes stayed at in 1945 in Biloxi,
Harold Arnold
September 7, 2004 - 06:06 pm
Jo Ann, Mal, and Mountain Rose have mentioned the book as a sort of writing skills text book. I too saw this as one of the author’s purposes in writing the book. One of the things he mentioned was that when after writing for his allotted time, he put the work away until he was ready to resume the next day. He erased it from his mind until the next conscious resumption of the work.
I guess I was a little surprised at such a complete mental erasure of a project one is working on. I was never a creative writer like Hemingway, but my current projects were always in my mind available for immediate consideration should a sudden flash occasion it. In particular on waking up in the morning, I often saw solutions that had not been envisioned the day before
Deems
September 7, 2004 - 06:10 pm
Hemingway's family members have suffered from depression and several have committed suicide. His father shot himself in the upstairs bedroom of his house in Michigan. His younger brother, Leicester shot himself. His sister, Ursula, committed suicide. One of his granddaughters, Margaux sister of Mariel, overdosed on pills.
Clinical depression does run in families and Hemingway's lifetime drinking made matters worse. He shot himself with a double barrel shotgun if I remember correctly.
Maryal
Harold Arnold
September 7, 2004 - 06:11 pm
Kelo has mentioned the logic of Hemingway’s suicide death in 1960. I was not aware of the plane crash in Africa that left him physically afflicted. I agree with Kelo’s that I see no reason to conclude that in his case the suicide was intent to hurt his survivors. I like the Joans though that he was very self centered and selfish. I suppose this is a common outlook for writers and other artists. I think for him it was a logical answer to physical impairments but I wonder if his expulsion from Castro’s Cuba where he had previously been living was not also a factor.
AND Deems has just given us another good explanation for Hemingway’s suicide- a hereditary genetic reason. She cites an impressive list of other such occurrences in the family.
Mountain Rose has given us a link to another good Hemingway biography. This one is unusual because it does give a bit more information on Hadley. One of the links I included yesterday incicated that she had been born in 1892 making her about 4 years older than Hemingway. The Mountain Rose link indicates Hadley had a trust fund that yielded $3,000 a year income. That would have been a decent income for US working class families even in the early Post WW II years. In 1950 I would have spit in my bosses face if I had had that income. I’ll add that link to the list in the heading.
Joan Grimes
September 7, 2004 - 07:38 pm
Oh I don't think Hemingway was trying to hurt anyone when he committed suicide. I did not mean that. I remember well when it happened. My first thought was how could someone with such a wonderful gift deprive the world of this talent by killing himself. I knew about the suicides and depression in his family and felt that was the real reason for his suicide. However people who suffer from depression are often self-centered people. I never liked Hemingway as a man but I have always admired his writing.
I was thinking back about Harold's question that asks if Hemingway neglected Hadley. I don't think he did. He was just like man going out to work everyday. It would have been very difficult to write in a two room apartment with someone else there. In the part of the book titled "A False Spring", Hemingway talks to Hadley about things that they did together. He describes and remembers things they did together. There are several comments about Hadley being at Gertrude Stein's home. She even stated once that she was a wife and she only talked with Stein's companion.
I agree with Mal that the book is an aid to writers.
I will comment on Paris tomorrow as I have said enough for one day.
Joan Grimes
Harold Arnold
September 7, 2004 - 07:46 pm
The following is a quote from the Margaret Macmillan book, “Paris 1919” quoting a 1922 Hemingway article written for a Toronto Newspaper on the unsuccessful end of the Greek intervention occupying a part of Turkish Asia-Minor:
All day long I have been passing them, dirty, tired, unshaven, wind-bitten soldiers, hiking along the trail across the brown, rolling, barren, Thrace countryside. No bands, no relief organizations, no leave areas, nothing but lice, dirty blankets, and mosquitoes at night. They are the last of the glory that was Greece. This is the end of their second siege of Troy.
How is that as effective writing of a new report? Would you say perhaps it is a tad better than most of the news bites we read today?
Scamper
September 7, 2004 - 08:23 pm
I went to Paris for the first time in 2000, just a week in the city mainly visiting the Louvre and tourist sights. I'd always heard it was the most beautiful city in the world. It was very attractive, but I didn't fall in love with it instantly. However, ever since I went I really relate to writings about Paris, especially the Lost Generation writings. I think Paris somehow was able to provide an intimate yet sophisticated atmosphere, and it is there to this day. A planned trip just after 9/11 fell through for obvious reasons - I was wanting to go back for two weeks and just wander around the museums some more.
I like your opening questions, Harold!
Pamela
Scamper
September 7, 2004 - 08:35 pm
I have the biography on Hemingway entitled A Life Without Consequences which has a wealth of information on Hemingway in all stages of his life. It says that he met Hadley through friends (at a party) in Chicago in 1920. She was 29 and had been somewhat of an invalid as a child after falling out of a tree and sustaining back injuries. However, it appears that her mother did a number on her to convince her of her fragility both physically and psychologically. I don't know how much of this carried over into her adult life. Her father, an executive in the family pharmaceutical business who had a drinking problem, committed suicide when Hadley was 12. Hadley became an accomplished pianist. Ernest claimed love at first sight when he met her while she was visiting (from St. Louis) Chicago. He eventually left her for a close friend (girl) of them both. In a brief look at my book, I couldn't really find a good reason for the breakup. Ernest was drinking heavily, etc. I thought I detected a lot of regret in A Moveable Feast at the loss of the Hadley relationship.
Ernest Hemingway was a complex person, and we probably will want to study him a long while before making many judgements about him. I do remember reading earlier this year that he absolutely could not NOT be married - that he just married one woman after another because he couldn't stand to be single.
Pamela
Scrawler
September 7, 2004 - 10:05 pm
"The writer's job is to tell the truth," Ernest Hemingway said.
"...sometimes when I was sarting a new story and I could not get it going, I would sit in front of the fire and squeeze the peel of the little oranges into the edge of the flame and watch the sputter of blue that they made. I would stand and look out over the roofs of Paris and think, "Do not worry. You have written before and you will write now. All you have to do is write: ONE TRUE SENTENCE. Write the truest sentence that you know." So finally I would write one true sentence, and then go on from there. It was easy then because there was always one true sentence that I knew or had seen or had heard someone say. If I started to write elaborately, or like someone introducing or presenting something, I found that I could cut that scrollwork or ornament out and throw it away and start with first true simple declarative sentence I had written." (P. 12)
This has to be the best advice for authors I have ever heard of. ONE TRUE SENTENCE. It's easier said than done.
Hemingway's personal and artistic quests for truth were directly related. His writing was his way of approaching his identity - of discovering himself. He felt that if he could see himself clear and whole, his vision might be useful to others.
Hemingway's search for truth and accuracy of expression is seen in his economical prose style. He used short and simple sentence constructions, with the use of parallelism so that his sentence structure was clear to all who read his stories. If you compare Hemingway's prose to the "flowery" prose of the generation of writers prior the 1910 you'll see the difference in their style.
"Up in that room I decide that I would write one story about each thing that I knew about. I was trying to do this all the time I was writing, and it was good and severe discipline." (P. 12)
This too is great advice and very difficult to do. One of Hemingway's geatest virtues as a writer was his self-discipline.
kidsal
September 7, 2004 - 11:38 pm
Have been reading the book and enjoying. Had a close call when I left it at the dentist's office and didn't know where it was -- but all OK now.
Harold Arnold
September 8, 2004 - 08:44 am
Hello, Scamper! So you too have been to Paris; you are the 3rd of our group who has been there. Thank you for your additional detail on Hadley from the Hemingway biography. The pieces of her puzzle are now beginning to come together.
The Biography Pamela referred to is
“Hemingway: A Life Without Consequences by James Mellow. Is there a picture of her in the biography you mentioned and if so how would you describe her looks? There was a small, dark picture of her on the link Mountain Rose linked yesterday. This indistinct image indicated she might have been rather large bodied. Is this impression correct and how would you describe her looks?
Deems
September 8, 2004 - 09:50 am
Harold--Here's a photo of Hemingway and Hadley somewhere in Europe.
http://worldroots.com/brigitte/gifs20/hadleyrichardson.jpg
Harold Arnold
September 8, 2004 - 10:08 am
I think this is the first post by both of you and you are most welcome. We hope to hear more from you. Any others out there are also welcome to join in any time.
Kidsal do hang on to the book and post your comments. I once misplaced the G, Gordon Liddy autobiography, “Will” at my work place at the Indian exhibit at the Institute of Texan Cultures. I had tossed it on the floor inside the Lipan tepee that is on display there. I forgot it, and a visitor later reported it to the front desk asking “what was G. Gordon Liddiy doing in the tepee. So I did recover the book and was able to complete Ella’s provocative discussion.
Scrawler, I might ask exactly what does H means in your quote regarding the need for a “true” sentence. Does he mean true as in honestly telling the truth without false hood, or does he mean a sentence capable of conveying the writer’s true meaning to the reader?
I think that H means mostly the latter. Any use of the word true as a synonymy for honest would have to carry an implied caveat, “as seen by the writer.” Others might have a different view as to its honesty.
I think four good examples of four true sentences in the sense H intended in Scrawler’s quote are the four sentences I quoted in message #55 from “Paris 1919.” Look how skillfully Hemingway painted a verbal picture of the Greek withdrawal from Asia Minor in the first two sentences with series of comma connected descriptive words and the concluding impact of the last two sentences contrasting the failure of the 1922 event with the glory of a similar occurrence in the ancient past. The reader at once realizes the full significance of the event. I think that is what Hemingway meant by “a true sentence.”
Harold Arnold
September 8, 2004 - 10:26 am
Deems that is a much better picture of Hadley than the small obscure image on the link yesterday. She seems quite an attractive woman.
Also that is quite an interesting picture of Hemingway. Look what he is wearing. I think they were called ’Knickers.” I recall parents in the 1930’s often clad their boy children in them as a transition from the short pants of childhood and the long pants of adolescence. In the 19th century and apparently in the 1920’s grown men sometimes wore them on sports related outdoor occasions. I judge this the last surviving appearance of the 18th century knee britches in our culture.
KleoP
September 8, 2004 - 10:34 am
I don't understand the fascination with the entourage of a famous person. Harold, for example, asked if she was a large woman or something. This just seems strange to me. How she impacted H might be of interest. But her looks or her size? Please someone explain to me the interest in Hadley. Am I the only one not interested? Why does her size interest you Harold? This is one reason I found his (H's) biography so boring--chapter after chapter about his fishing with a boyhood friend, interacting with a town cop at 16, blah, blah, blah. Does everyone in here like knowing these details?
How did they earn a living? In addition to Hadley's income, H had a paying job while in Paris. They actually had quite a bit of money compared to other expats. Living in Paris at the time was very cheap.
I have never been to Paris. My mother travels in Europe a lot and says bathroom facilities throughout Europe are not generally on a par with American ones until you get to 4-star hotels, even today. But compared to remote Asian areas, they are palatial, it seems.
At that time, however, there were millions of Americans living in cities in 5th floor walkups with shared facilities. But I guess these were technically called 'tenements.' Some artists find slumming it conducive to the creative endeavor.
Kleo
KleoP
September 8, 2004 - 10:39 am
Gertrude Stein was a very interesting woman. Someone in here said her writing was not as important as she thought it was. I've only read one of her books, The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas. I thought the writing was generally excellent and found the book to be very important. This surprised me as my thought, prior to reading the book, was about the same as Rose's.
Gertrude Stein collected art by some of the most revered artists of today. In her day, however, these artists were not well known, and their works were looked upon with disdain at times. Stein bought their works, gave the artists living money as needed, and maintained them as part of her entourage early on in their careers. She and her brother owned a collection of works that today would be valued in billions of dollars.
Artists that she ignored at the time are less famous than ones that she collected today. After reading her book and learning about the art she collected I am convinced she was a cultural genius. I'm willing to grant her her place in history.
Kleo
Joan Grimes
September 8, 2004 - 10:49 am
I cannot remember how many times I have been to Paris. I went there the first time in 1976. I loved the city at that time. I was completely enthralled with it.The city took my heart and will not let it go. I had studied French many years before and had let it go. However I was pleasantly surprised that the language was returning to me with my visit to Paris. I was an English teacher at the time. When I returned home I began to study the French language again on my own. I took students to Europe every year after that and would always do a short visit to Paris. It seemed that Paris captured my heart and would not let it go. A few years later I had the opportunity to go back to school and get a degree in French and began to teach French. I have visited Paris at least once a year ever since then. When I resumed my study of French I went every year for many years and spent 6 weeks in France. I always spent at least a week of that time in Paris. I know Paris and France very well. I am still lucky enough to be able to spend about a week every year in Paris.
When I first discovered Hemingway's book, "A Moveable Feast" I loved it.
My first thoughts about it were that Hemingway felt the same way about Paris as I do. I still believe that. I can read his clear beautiful descriptions with the names of the streets and I feel that I am in Paris. Reading his words on p.56 of my book:
"We"re watching the water now as it hits this buttress. Look what we can see when we look up the river."
We looked an there it all was: our river and our city and the islan of our city.
"We are too lucky," she said.
I feel that Paris is my city too and everytime I return there I feel this wonderful feeling. I am so happy and so at home.
Although conditions are very different now from what they were in Hemingway's day, this is still the same Paris because Hemingway has captured perfectly the spirit and feel of the most beautiful and wonderful city in the world( In my opinion).
Joan Grimes
MmeW
September 8, 2004 - 11:43 am
Hi, all! I thought it might be fun to reread Feast, and so far it is. I must confess that I’ve never much liked Hemingway and his macho posturing, though his writing is interesting. It struck me in For Whom the Bell Tolls, for example, that he was writing English as though it were translated directly from Spanish.
Count me as the 4th person who has been to Paris (many times) and even lived there in 1965. That sentence “And then there was the bad weather” absolutely describes my stay. After passing a glorious summer with evenings spent listening to handsome Spaniards playing their guitars and singing in the grassy park at the Cité Université, where it was light until 10:00, came September and the rain. And it rained for a solid year. I’m sure glad I had that summer, for winter never dawned clear as EH describes it. And since someone mentioned the “facilities,” I have a wonderful black and white picture from that time of one of those “pissoires” on the sidewalk that men would walk into to relieve themselves, the wall coming to about chest level.
Oddly enough, I’m much more familiar with Paris now than then (I guess I spent all my time going to school and working and not doing much exploring). I find I can walk with him down Cardinal Lemoine to Place Contrescarpe, over to the Panthéon, etc. Joan, you were posting as I was writing and I couldn’t agree with you more. People wonder why I keep going back, but to me there is Paris, and then the rest of the world. When I finally dragged my husband over there 15 years after my first stay, he said, “If I had been here when I was 23, I would never have left.” And so began our mutual romance with the City of Light.
Kleo, I find the bathroom facilities in 3-star hotels quite fine. They’ve come a long way from the bathroom-down-the-hall experiences I had in the 60s. (Of course, I wasn’t staying in the better hotels either.)
I mainly think pictures are interesting because I like to put a face with a name. I read somewhere that even though their marriage lasted only six years, he and Hadley remained fond of one another. Her money had enabled his stay in Paris, but without him her life would have lacked adventure, a symbiotic relationship, I think. Here is a
nice wedding photo of Ernest and Hadley.
I also went to the same high school as EH, Oak Park, and discovered the impressionists at the Chicago Art Institute, as he did. I often walked over there on my lunch hour to pay a brief visit to my favorites. Since we are discussing the “one true sentence” concept, I found this sentence particularly interesting (and mysterious): “I was learning something from the painting of Cézanne that made writing simple true sentences far from enough to make the stories have the dimensions that I was trying to put in them.” Does that mean he denies the “true sentence” concept right after he posits it? or is it more posturing? (I find it difficult to take anything he says at face value--oops, my negativity is creeping in!)
But I loved this “true” sentence, that the fruit brandies “all tasted like the fruits they came from, converted into a controlled fire on your tongue that warmed you and loosened it.” In a nutshell.
Joan Grimes
September 8, 2004 - 12:10 pm
If we look at the primitive living conditions in Paris in 1921 in a place that would have been in the range that Hemingway felt that he could afford, we might also need to look at living conditions in other cities at the time. Things everywhere as they were in i921 would be considered considered primitive to us today.
In Paris today there are all sorts of affordable places to stay that are quite nice. You can find affordable apartments to rent that have all the modern conviences. Many of them do not have elevators but if you are able to walk upstairs they are just fine. The buildings are old but people do have modern conviences in Paris today.
I did not think that anyone would think that things were the same as they were in 1921.
MmeW , I am in complete agreement with your statment, "I must confess that I’ve never much liked Hemingway and his macho posturing, though his writing is interesting. "
Joan Grimes
Harold Arnold
September 8, 2004 - 05:01 pm
MmeW, thank you for joining us. As you said you are the 4th (Mal, Joan, Scamper and Mmew) of the participants who has been to Paris. I think the several posts today by you and Joan lead to the conclusion that living in France today are quite different from the 1920’s, just as they are in the US. This is true with respect to living conditions and living cost. I understand today that comparative living costs and worker income in countries such as Germany, the UK, France and others are in many cases equal to or greater than in the US. I just did a quickie Web search that seemed to confirm this with contemporary cost of living/wage statistics.
But it was quite different in 1922 when certainly the Hemingway’s were living quite comfortable (though modestly) on the $3,000 Hadley annuity plus Ernest’s earnings. We can pursue this further next week when Ernest seems to have quit his reporting jobs to pursue writing full time seemingly leaving them living on the Hadley annuity
Harold Arnold
September 8, 2004 - 05:04 pm
Kleo, I think you are right; I am over emphasizing the Hadley role in this phase of Hemingway’s life. You know, I think it is her name that makes her stand out to me. “Hadley” seems so untypical for a 19th century woman which is what she was having been born in 1891. To me it is a name never heard until the mid-20th century. But quie likely we now know all that is necessary we know about this relatively minor character.
Regarding Gertrude Stein I have never read any of her writing although I recognized the title, “The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas.” I guess I have thought of her more as an An American expatriate in Paris more as a society figure hosting parties and perhaps a mentor to Hemingway and others. I find now that she was definitely more than that having some claim to being both writer and artist in her own right. Judging from the conclusion of the Web sources, however, she does not seem to be judged great in either field. The Web sources seem to base her greatest claim to fame on her ability as an art critic and on her role as mentor in support of Hemingway and other lost generation people. Based on the names of the painters whose works she owned, the post quoting the value of her collection in the billions of today’s dollars may quite likely be close.
Scamper
September 8, 2004 - 05:38 pm
The wedding photo link that someone posted today is the same as the picture in the biography
A Life Without Consequences. There's also a much later picture of Hadley, who looks much plainer then (don't we all!). Hadley is described in this book as "tall, sturdy, handsome rather than pretty. Hemingway...found her auburn hair especially attractive."
I'm curious why everyone is so hard on Hemingway and his macho posturing. I've read several of his works, liking some and not liking others. I read about him in
The Autobiography of Alice.. and in
Everybody Was So Young. I didn't think either book gave a complete picture. I guess I'm going to have to read
A Life Without Consequences soon unless someone wants to fill me in on his macho posturing negative qualities.
As a not very related aside, I've been to the house he lived in while he lived in Key West. It's full of descendants of his cats, usually white, all of whom six toes. You can admire them at
http://www.hemingwayhome.com/HTML/our_cats.htm.
Pamela
KleoP
September 8, 2004 - 06:31 pm
The macho posturing, per se, doesn't bother me, because I find the man's writing to be of far more interest to me than the man himself.
As Pamela well knows, my opinion of Hemingway was greatly changed by reading his The Sun Also Rises. I don't know why I started an Authors of the Lost Generation book club, except maybe that I thought reading from such an initially appearing limited genre could make me an expert in that area. However, I did not like Hemingway's, except for The Old Man and the Sea, possibly the best book ever written, or Fitzgerald's writings before the book club. I was stunned by The Sun Also Rises. Without his macho posturing, this book would not exist. Hemingway is a very complex man. I would not take away any of his complexities to be left with a lesser man and, possibly, lesser literature.
One thing we asked in my book club about Stein was, would she have liked you? would you have liked her? had you known her back then. I liked this question (not mine, someone else's). I think of it about Hemingway. Would he have liked me? Would I have liked him? I do a lot of things and know a lot about things that Hemingway liked. I grew up around hunters and fishermen and with explorers and scientists. I think we might have liked each other as people. I think Stein would have found me boring.
Kleo
Scrawler
September 8, 2004 - 07:52 pm
Harold, I think Hemingway actually did both. He not only created true sentence structure, but he also spoke of the truth as he saw it in real life in his stories. One reason he created for us "true scenes" was because he actually went to the areas he wrote about and he spoke to the people there and he than re-created that experience into his characters. So there is a ring of truth in all his work. Take for example: "A Farewell to Arms" although he was not a soldier, he was an ambulance driver and I'm sure he saw what happened to the soldiers on the front. Now compare this to an author like Stephen Crane. Stephen Crane wrote the "The Red Badge of Courage" but he never actually was involved in the American Civil War. He created his characters from newspaper articles. According to Hemingway, "The writer's job is to tell the truth." But I also think it is the writer's job to experience the truth so he can pass this experience on to the reader.
"After writing a story I was always empty and both sad and happy, as though I had made love, and I was sure this was a very good story although I would not know truly how good until I read it over the next day. (P. 6)
I love Hemingway's parallelism of writing a story to making love. Hemingway has often been compared to "a kind of twentieth-century Lord Byron." Does anyone else see Hemingway as a kind of...Lord Byron?
"It was a pleasant cafe, warm and clean and friendly, and I hung up my old waterproof on the coat rack to dry and put my worn and weathered felt hat on the rack above the bench and ordered a cafe au lait. The waiter brought it and I took out my notebook from the pocket of the coat and a pencil and started to write. I was writing about up in Michigan and since it was a wild, cold, blowing day it was that sort of day in the story." (P. 5)
I doubt that Hemingway would have cared much for computers. I think he worked well in the cafe surrounded by Paris. I think he felt very much alive and because of this energy that he drew from those around him it only added toward his over-all engery that he used to create his stories. He might have been thinking of Michigan, but he was living Paris!
Deems
September 9, 2004 - 07:51 am
Hemingway's life fascinates me. And I think it is unarguable that his prose style had a profound effect on all the American writers who followed him. He is called a minimalist because he attempted to clear all the underbrush out of his sentences and keep them as clean and to the point as possible.
But I'm with those who find his masculine posturing somewhat insufferable. It has been my experience that women often feel that way when reading his novels. His male characters are developed and three-dimensional but his female characters usually exist only as foils for the men. They are romantic, they are great in bed, they die young. If you read many of his novels, all the women seem to be variations on a theme--Hemingway's ideal woman.
But his life--what can I say? He lived all over the place; he had four wives and three sons; he found a way to get to all the important wars of his time.
I thought Hemingway: A Life Without Consequences was quite wonderful (but keep in mind that I am really interested in his life).
I am charmed by A Moveable Feast chiefly for its portrait of Paris. I don't think Hemingway can be trusted on much of the information he gives about Stein and Fitzgerald because all his life he seemed to be unable to forgive people who helped him. He was, in a word, mean-spirited. Hemingway withheld this book from publication during his lifetime, and I understand why.
Harold Arnold
September 9, 2004 - 09:54 am
Several of the messages including those by Deems, Scrawler, and Kleo have mentioned Hemingway’s writing style. Here are some comments based on material from my 1947 sophomore literature text book,
Writers Of The Western World edited by Addison Hibbard.. My book is marked on the cover, “The US Naval Academy Edition.” Deems are you familiar with it?
The book divided the different selections from ancient Greeks (Homer) to the 1940s by the writing mood into categories such as The Classicists, The Romantics, and The Realists and into various subdivisions of each. Hemingway along with Chaucer, Pepys, Tolstoy, Kipling are classed as a “Realist.” The book describes Hemingway’s writings in the followning words:
He writes of the outdoors, of fishing and hunting, of bullfights and war. Indeed, some readers, such as J.B. Priestley who speak of the writer’s “swaggering masculinity,” protest against this constant activity and find it pose. Hemingway writes of elemental people in elemental situations in a manner characteristically brutal, clear, and precise. His character moves through violence. He writes frequently of love, but in a manner best termed “hard boiled.” His modernism is shown in his realistic, sometimes naturalistic, treatment of subjects which in the hands of other writers would likely be turned into romantic stories of adventure. His frank diction, his refusal to end stories happily, his keen regard for specific details- these are, however, essentially realistic qualities.
I liked reading Hemingway because he was easy to read and easy to understand, a quality that was not always present in other authored writings. Perhaps this is what is meant his being judged “a minimalist,” as mentioned by Deems. I can certainly understand the position of many female readers who find his dominating masculinity and lack of sensitivity simply too overbearing. In 1947 my Hemingway favorites were “For Whom the Bells Tolls”, and “The Snows of Kilimanjaro.” In the 1950’s I added “The Old Man And the Sea,” and now I think I will add “A Moveable Feast” also.
KleoP
September 9, 2004 - 10:20 am
Harold--
Have you read The Sun Also Rises? I suspect your opinion of Hemingway and his being easy to read is highly influenced by which ones you've read (well, that's a no-brainer). We read and discussed The Sun Also Rises for a month solid. It was one of the toughest books we've discussed in the club. Hemingway is anything but an easy read.
Kleo
Deems
September 9, 2004 - 12:41 pm
Harold--What a wonderful story about the edition of Writers of the Western World (1947) which is marked as "the US Naval Academy Edition." I'll have to check out the history on that one.
Here's my guess--Back there in the 1940s, all the mids took the same courses; they had no choice. There wasn't even a separate English Dept. as we have now. English and History were together. There were no majors.
Now we have lots of majors that the mids choose from--the "lockstep curriculum" is gone.
The guess--In the forties, the book was ordered for all the midshipmen who took a required course, most likely titled "Literature of the Western World." This would have been a big sale for the publisher and in gratitude, "The U S Naval Academy Edition" was printed on all the books.
Perhaps also, some of the professors requested that certain writers be included in a future edition. That request was answered and the new edition was the one you have.
As I said, I am guessing.
Now, in English and History at any rate, every instructor/professor, military or civilian picks his/her own texts. The only books that are issued to the mids during their plebe summer (that I know about) are the Bible (NIV) and a Dictionary (currently Merriam-Webster) and a handbook (currently Lunsford's The Everyday Writer. We change handbooks every five years or so and there is great competition out there in publishing land to get the contract because this is a sure sale of a rather large number of books. The current handbook has been ours for the last two years.
Tomorrow I'll try to find one of my colleagues who just might know the history of the book you have.
Maryal
Scrawler
September 9, 2004 - 02:31 pm
"...Miss Stein loaned me "The Lodger," that marvelous story of Jack the Ripper. It was a splendid after-work book, the people credible and the action and the terror never false." ("A Moveable Feast" P. 27)
"...I learned much from Ezra, in converstion principally, from G. Stein...Learned a lot from her before she went haywire." (To Arnold Gingrich "Selected Letters, 1933, pp. 384-385)
"...I went to Spain...where I'm trying to do the country like Cezanne and having a hell of a time and sometimes getting it a little bit...It is about 100 pages long and nothing happens and the country is swell, I made it all up, so I see it all and part of it comes out the way it ought to..." (To Gertrude Stein, "Selected Letters, 1924, p.122)
"Malcolm Cowley assessed the importance of Stein and Pound (who were both friends of Hemingway) to his literary development, while stressing that the educational relationship was mutual. 'One thing he took partly from her [Stein] was a colloquial - in appearance - American style, full of reported words, prepostional phrases, and present participles, the style in which he wrote his early published stories...'" (Biography Resource Center)
Hemingway also believed in the cyclicality of the world. As inscriptions to his novel "The Sun Also Rises", he used two quotations: first, Gertrude Stein's comment, "You are all a lost generation"; then a verse from Ecclesiastes which begins, "One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh; but the earth abideth forever..." (Biography Resource Center)
"Through her [Stein] influence on Sherwood Anderson and, more significantly, on Ernest Hemingway, she made a decisive contribution to modern American literture and prose style, although assessments of this contribution tend to be colored by responses to her personality. Her "hearty humanity," forthrightness, shrewd picturesque pronouncements, and other less defianble qualities- a reverberent voice, an infectious laugh, a mixed aura of Buddha, Wise Child, and Earth Mother - gave her a magnetism apart from the respect her work elicited. (Biography Resorce Center)
From the many quotes above we can see that at least in the early part of Hemingway's life Gertrude Stein became an influence on his personal and writing life. When Stein remarked that his was a lost generation; Hemingway came back with the remark: "every generation is lost"; which has a ring of truth in it. Later Stein and Hemingway had a bitter personal and literary feud, which they both pursued in print.
Does anyone know what set this feud off between them?
Harold Arnold
September 9, 2004 - 03:29 pm
As I said previously, I have never been to Paris, but a picture I made about 1970 in Paris USA is attached. I think we see quite a bit of what is French in this view.
Joan Grimes
September 9, 2004 - 05:21 pm
What a great idea to post some photos Harold. I enjoyed seeing that one. I have some of scenes in Paris, France.
This photo of Notre Dame was taken from the Left Bank of the Seine. Notre Dame Cathedral from the side.
aview of Notre Dame from the back showing the flying buttresses..
We took these on Good Friday just after 6:00PM. All the Bells rang at 6:00PM. Hearing the bells was a great experience.
Joan Grimes
MmeW
September 9, 2004 - 05:42 pm
Ooh! I have a great picture of a street troubador on rue Mouffetard (in EH's areaI). He plays every Sunday after church and passes out the words and everyone sings and dances. My friend danced with this natty little man and apologized for not speaking French. He said, "That's OK. I'm from Boston." Can I send my picture to someone? I also may have a picture of the Place Contrescarpe, which is a lovely little square, and maybe Shakespeare & Co.
Your pictures are lovely, Joan.
Joan Grimes
September 9, 2004 - 05:49 pm
MmeW just click on my name and send you photos to me. Attachment as jpg to your email. I will be happy ot post them for you.
Joan
Deems
September 9, 2004 - 06:28 pm
What wonderful photos. Sure does make me homesick for Paris. My daughter lived there for five months on a post-grad fellowship. She really gets homesick for Paris. She had a studio right on the Seine. When I woke up in the morning, I got up on one elbow and looked at that river.
MmeW
September 9, 2004 - 06:46 pm
So funny. Every day I rode the #6 to work from Denfert-Rochereau to l'Etoile. There is a moment it rises from underground into the air and you can see the Seine and the Eiffel Tower, and every day I was astounded that I would see that sight on the way to work.
I went back through my digital photos and determined that my Mouffetard pix were not digital, etc. Sorry. As we read, if I see something that I have, I'll send it to Joan.
Joan Grimes
September 9, 2004 - 07:50 pm
A Minstrel in Paris MmeW , please tell us about this photo.
Joan Grimes
Harold Arnold
September 9, 2004 - 07:52 pm
Joan those are beautiful pictures of Paris. Were they made with the Canon, Digital Rebel camera?
As you might have gathered my New Orleans shot was from a Black and White film 8 X 10 inch sepia enlargement hand colored with light oils. The Camera was a FTN Nikon but I’m not sure which lens. I scanned it this afternoon at 600 dpi resolution. The only enhancement necessary was a small increase of contrast.
Joan Grimes
September 9, 2004 - 08:02 pm
Deems, thanks for the nice comment about the photos. I am sure your daughter must miss Paris alot. I is not hard to get a good photo in Paris. Everything is so beautiful.
Thanks Harold. I did not take these particular photos. I have some taken of the same scenes at the same time but these were easier to get to quickly. Theron took these with is Sony Mavica CD 1000. I did not buy the Rebel until after we returned from Paris.
Your photo is really nice and interesting.
Joan
Harold Arnold
September 9, 2004 - 08:24 pm
Kleo, I have not read “Sun Also Rises,” but I am sure some of Hemingway’s books are more difficult to read and understand than others. I know, for example, that “For Whom The Bells Tolls” is more difficult to read than “Old Man and the Sea” or “A Moveable Feast,” but it seemed to me most elementary in comparison to say the Lawrence Durrell, Alexandria Quartet novels.
Deems, a jpg image of the title page of the “Writers of the Western World” is attached. I suspect your theory of the origin of the Navy Academy Edition is probably close to correct. A Navy officer’s name is mentioned on the title page. They probably ordered only several thousand and the Publisher printed many more and pushed then to other schools. I liked the book as a good way to interest non-English majors in literature.
MountainRose
September 9, 2004 - 09:05 pm
. . . thanks for explaining how it was done. It was hard to tell if it was a photo or a painting. And it is BOTH!
Loved your photos of Paris Joan. One thing about European cities is that they were originally built for walking, not cars, so there is an ambiance there that is missing in most American cities. And because everything is so old most of the rivers going through cities have stone banks and lovely parks and paths for sauntering. It really is lovely.
But you know, for some reason all that "civilized" grooming gets on my nerves after a while. I guess that's why I prefer the wildness of the American West, except for visits to those "groomed" places once in a while. It's just a personal idiosyncracy (sp?). I also don't like the weather in Northern Europe and ADORE the blue skies here. LOL
MountainRose
September 9, 2004 - 09:14 pm
. . . read besides this one is "The Old Man and the Sea" which I loved. Tomorrow I'm going to the library, and I will pick up some of his others to see what I think about his writing. I do like the minimalism of it, the spare "get to the point" style and the beautiful metaphors he uses in what I have read.
"The Old Man and the Sea" sort of reminded me of "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich". A whole book about a very short time span, with wonderful psychological insights.
Harold, I loved the Alexandria Quartet novels even though I don't often read novels, but I loved the descriptions of Egypt and Cairo during that time span. Sort of along the same line about a group of expatriates--just in another country.
These days we have a lot of expatriates living in Mexico. Wonder what sort of writing will come out of there.
MmeW
September 9, 2004 - 09:43 pm
I really liked The Sun Also Rises, but I didn't think it was nearly as difficult as The Sound and the Fury, which I read for the same class. I did notice that Hemingway "lost" a day on the way to Spain (example: left on Monday, arrived three days later, on Friday), but then that's how I am—very left-brained.
The photo is of the troubador of whom I spoke, the one who plays every Sunday after church at the end of the rue Mouffetard. Obviously, he wasn't doing that in Hemingway's time. Still, it is amazing that such a communal, "folklorique" thing is still going on today. It is wonderful to see everyone, young and old, participating in that ritual. It has a special meaning to me because right after my husband died (in Hopital Cochin) there was an evening street festival there. A fellow French teacher from Maine had come over and we sat in a sidewalk cafe and sang, right next to a table of young people, and watched people dance in the streets. It really conveyed the feeling of continuity, the circle of life, if you will.
KleoP
September 10, 2004 - 09:11 am
Mme W -- I found The Sound and the Fury to be an easier and lighter read for me than The Sun Also Rises. This is most likely because I read the former after falling in love with Faulkner and the latter while still loathing Hemingway.
If you like reading about Egypt, Harold and Rose, have you ever read the Cairo Trilogy by Najib Mahfouz? It's set some 40-50 years earlier than the Durrell books, which I will have to check into some days. Are they about Egyptians or about expats? The Mahfouz books are about the Egyptian poor in the city. Sugar Street, the third book in Mahfouz' trilogy, is one of my favorite books of all time.
The Old Man and the Sea and One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich are both short books covering a limited time span. However, their respective authors are so stylistically different that it's hard for me to think of them with the same sentence. There is nothing Russian about Hemingway's technique, it's almost the antithesis of Russian writing with its sparseness and simple sentences.
Thanks for all the photos.
Kleo
Harold Arnold
September 10, 2004 - 10:41 am
In one of Hemingway’s conversations with Miss Stein, She asks what other authors he was reading? He answers, “Aldous Huxley and D.H. Lawrence.” Both of these writers seem to have “abhorred conformity and denounced the orthodox attitudes of his time. I think this characteristic questioning of existing authority can apply to Hemingway’s writing and for that matter most other successful 20th century writers.
Miss Stein did not approve of either Huxley or Lawrence. On
D.H. Lawrence she said, “He’s impossible. He’s pathetic and preposterous. He writes like a sick man (P 26).”
I have read only one of the Lawrence novels, yes it was “Lady Chatterley’s Lover.” It seemed easy to understand. I suppose had it been available in 1921 Stein would have considered it too “inaccrochable”
Miss Stein judged
Aldous Huxley" dead. “Why do you want to read a dead man,” she asked Hemingway (P 26). Hemingway, who did not consider Huxley dead, replied somewhat meekly, “his books amused me and kept me from thinking. ( P 26). I don’t think he really meant the last phrase?
Again I have read only one of Huxley’s novels, “Brave New Worlds.” I really liked this book with its setting in the future in New Mexico. I found it much easer reading and understanding than the similar themed “1984” by George Orwell. I suspect that it was the New Mexico setting of the Huxley story that attracted me since its four front (Indian, Spanish, Mexican & Anglo) multi-culture of today has always fascinated me. That was the theme of my 2001 Web pictorial essay.
“New Mexico”.
In conclusion I do believe Miss Stein was a significant influence affecting Hemingway’s future career.
KleoP
September 10, 2004 - 11:01 am
I read Huxley for the exact same reason that Hemingway did. I read to stop my brain from thinking. It's why I watch television and movies, also. Not all of the time. It's called escapist literature. When your mind is in a constant turmoil of thoughts it is wonderful to have someting guaranteed to turn it off. Sleep doesn't do it as my dreams use up those hours. Certain types of literature do it, as do some movies and some music.
I like both the Huxley and the Orwell. Orwell, however, does not stop me from thinking, as Huxley does. I know more men who read and enjoy both of these novelists than I know women. I thought most of Brave New World took place in England, the World State, though, and the part on the Reservation was smaller. Remember that the book opens in England, then heads off to New Mexico, and John comes back to the World State.
I agree with Stein on Lawrence.
Kleo
Harold Arnold
September 10, 2004 - 11:34 am
Mountain Rose. I like your point noting the similarity of the Alexandria Quartette and “A Moveable Feast’ linked through both being stories of expatriates living in foreign countries, albeit in much different countries and maybe different times.
Or was it really different times? I found Durrell vague as to the time setting of those novels. It was definitely 20th century and I think from my reading, it too was intended as the Post WW I period? True, those novels were not published until after WW II but a post WW II time setting to me does not seem consistent with my recollection from my 1980’s reading. This was over 20 years ago and I may have forgot?
And we have another Paris picture! Thank you MmeW for the picture of the American street musician in Paris. And thank you Joan for posting it. Isn’t it interesting how the ancient tradition of the wandering minstrel still prevails?
Kleo, I was not aware of the
Cairo Trilogy of Najib Mahfouz. The above link leads to the B&N page for the first volume, “Palace Walk;” The second volume is “Palace of Desire” and the third apparently is “Sugar Sweet.” This one is the story of an Egyptian family in Egypt under the British in the early 20th century.
And Kleo, you voice another provocative thought of reading something to allow the brain a respite from thinking. Come to think of it that may have been a factor in my enjoyment of the Huxley book
MmeW
September 10, 2004 - 11:55 am
Mountain Rose, oddly enough, I wrote a paper years ago on the mixed-up chronology of the Alexandria Quartet (that old left brain again), and it did take place from 1936-1945, a little after Moveable Feast.
Maybe expats are striking in literature because they not defined by, but rather reacting to, the culture they are inhabiting.
Scrawler
September 10, 2004 - 03:48 pm
In my last post I asked if anyone knew why Stein and Hemingway had a falling out and I did a little digging and this is the result. The following is from "A Guide to Hemingway's Paris":
Stein and her lover Alice B. Toklas lived at 27, Rue de Fleurus for nearly thirty years. Stein's studio and apartment was an expatriate center; Hemingway remembers in AMF [A Moveable Feast] his and Hadley's visits to what was like "one of the best rooms in the finest museum except that there was a big fireplace and...they gave you good things to eat and tea and natural distilled liqueurs made from purple plums, yellow plums or wild raspberries" [AMF, pp. 13-14]. While Toklas entertained Hadley, Stein and Hemingway talked literature.
In AMF, Hemingway praises Stein's "rhythms and uses of words in repeition." He parodies this style in "From Whom the Bell Tolls, where Robert Jordan spoofs Stein's famous "A rose is a rose is a rose," with "A rose is a rose is an onion...An onion is an onion is an onion...a stone is a stein is a rock is a boulder is a pebble" [FBT, p.289].
The parody came after Hemingway and Stein had fallen out. Toklas claimed she had talked Sein into dumping Hemingway. Toklas had tried of Hemingway's obsession with "le legend, toujours le legend" [Simon, p.1118].
Stein's "Autobiography of Alice B. Tokla may have played a role too. It labels Hemingway as yellow and "ninety percent Rotarian." Whatever the reasons, Hemingway took his revenge in AMF. Again parodying Stein's "uses of words in repetition," he overhears her talking to Toklas, "Don't, pussy. Don't. Don't please don't. Please don't, pussy" [AMF, p.118].
Harold Arnold
September 10, 2004 - 05:13 pm
MmeW, I'am somewhat relieved to hear that I am not the only reader confused by the chronology setting of the Alexandrian Quartet. The 1936 - 1945 date sounds reasonable enough except I don't remember actual references to the war that would seem to have deserved some notice since the German Army in 1941 and 1942 was poised to invade Egypt.
Scrawler, in any case I guess its not unusual for casual friendships to break-up particularly as in this case with the Hemingway’s on one hand and the Stein/Alice relationship on the other. Perhaps Alice sensed Hemingway’s disapproval. Hemingway offers no specific comment of his judgment or the relationship in the book
Hemingway mentioned that Stein wrote her stories by pen in longhand and the friend then made typed copies. I do not remember any mention of Hemingway using a typewriter. Do you suppose Hemingway sent his stories to his publisher in longhand? Perhaps publishers had not yet began to require typed submissions?
MmeW
September 10, 2004 - 06:29 pm
Harold, the first three volumes end in 1939 and it is only Clea that takes place after that, where war comes to Alexandria in 1942.
I think Durrell was so busy cranking out the novels, he didn't take time to rectify any errors.
MountainRose
September 10, 2004 - 07:53 pm
literature, because they are reacting to the culture which they inhabit. It's almost like traveling and seeing things through their eyes.
I enjoy the opposite also, a foreigners view of the U.S.A. I have a very unusual car imported from Germany (although by now with lots of bumps and bruises from traveling off-road a lot), and whenever I am at a tourist spot, Europeans come around to ask me about my car. We get to talking about their reactions to the U.S.A., the things they like and the things they don't like, and things they don't understand and have trouble with---and I enjoy that tremendously, because it makes me see my own surroundings in brand new ways. They especially reveal many things when they discover I speak German and enough French to get by, and confide things that they don't know how to express to others.
One of the things one well-traveled young man said that has left a lasting impression on me was: "If you want to experience man-made beauty, there is no place like Europe with its architecture, history, art and music; if you want to see wild God-made beauty there is simply no place like the U.S.A.
Harold Arnold
September 10, 2004 - 08:18 pm
It seems Miss Stein owned a Model T Ford that required service at a local Garage. I can hardly imagine Stein in a Model T, but Hemingway tells us it is so in black and white on page 29.
The garage was busy and Miss Stein’s usual mechanic had other work and the work on the Stein vehicle was not complete as the owner thought is should be. A furious Miss Stein complained to the Garage manager who promptly disciplined the mechanic with a verbal dressing down in French that concluded with, “You are all a génération perdue.” You are all (the garage mechanics) a lost generation.
Miss Stein either heard or was other informed of the oratory and seems to have got quite a kick out to the results of her complaint. At any rate she told the story to Hemingway concluding with: ”That’s what you are, all of you young people who served in the war. You are a lost generation.” “Really,” answered Hemingway. “You are,” Stein insisted. The dialog continued (p 29) with Hemingway defending his peer group until Miss Stein ended it with: ”Don’’t argue with me Hemingway. It does no good at all. You’re all a lost generation exactly as the garage keeper said.”
I don’t think Hemingway thought much of Steins “Lost Generation” charge because after a COLD beer at the Lilas and a bit of appreciative speculating on his friendship with Stein, he returned to his home to tell Hadley, Gertrude is nice, but “she does talk a lot of rot sometimes.”
Cold Beer in Europe? I thought the Europeans drank it at room temperature. I know the English do and I thought the Germans too. Is beer generally sold (refrigerated) cold in France?
Harold Arnold
September 10, 2004 - 08:25 pm
One of the things one well-traveled young man said that has left a lasting impression on me was: "If you want to experience man-made beauty, there is no place like Europe with its architecture, history, art and music; if you want to see wild God-made beauty there is simply no place like the U.S.A.
No argument from me!
Harold Arnold
September 11, 2004 - 08:44 am
I will be absent this afternoon for my work at the ITC. You may join me there
with a click here.
MountainRose
September 11, 2004 - 09:00 am
. . . MUST BE FUN!!!
MountainRose
September 11, 2004 - 09:43 am
. . . something called "The New Masses" which was a Marxist magazine/newspaper of the time in the U.S. Keep that in mind when you read this fairly scathing review, although I personally happen to agree with some of it regarding her writing, without agreeing with the political diatribe this author includes. It's not like Marxist art has contributed anything to the betterment of society, since it was so restrictive and banal, so I'm not at all sure where they believe they have the right to criticize Stein. Nevertheless, it's an interesting way of looking at her writing:
http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/88/stein-per-gold.html I do think at that time all art was experimenting with new things, and in a revolutionary mode, whether it was writing or painting or dance or music. One can only repeat the same thing so many times and then one has to break free even if the beginnings of it don't work very well. I think that's what Picasso did and why he was a genius. He broke completely free of all that had gone before him and showed us new ways of looking at things. Apparently Stein understood that because she certainly appreciated Picasso's work, while here I am in the next century and I still don't appreciate it or understand it. LOL
MountainRose
September 11, 2004 - 09:58 am
(oh, how I hate women's fashions of that time!!!) and some insight into her writing and what she was trying to do that I don't really understand. Apparently she wrote a lengthy poem in response to Eliot's "The Waste Land", neither of which make much sense to me. I find the parts of "The Waste Land" that I do understand to be much too dark to spend any time with it, although it guaranteed Eliot's fame (he will come up later on in the book too).
http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/poets/s_z/stein/stein.htm
Harold Arnold
September 11, 2004 - 06:08 pm
Is there not an "idle art" just as there is an "idle rich"? Both do nothing but cultivate the insanity of their own desires, both cultivate strange indulgences. The literary idiocy of Gertrude Stein only reflects the madness of the whole system of capitalist values. It is part of the signs of doom that are written largely everywhere on the walls of bourgeois society.
Wow the "New Masses" writer really laid it on Gertrude, didn't they The author simply could not forgive her for having the income to live for 31 years in Paris, pouring out crap, that the evil capitalist system allowed her to pass off as art. I think this is a typical Marxist writing of the between the wars period.
The truth is that the Marxist message was being favorably received in the US at the time. I had not heard of this one but another Marxist magazine named "Dissent" was still in the news stands in the post WW II years. It may even have survived the McCarthy years. Remember the US brigade fighting for the loyalists in the Spanish Civil War, was raised by the US Communist party. I seem to remember this figured in the plot of Hemingway's "For Whom the Bells Tolls." Even so I don't think Hemingway himself was attracted to the movement. I have no recollection of his name ever coming up in the McCarthy witch-hunt of the 1950.
In conclusion in my opinion miss Steins art may indeed have been the crap the "New Masses" proclaimed it to be, but the reason, I’m sure is something other than her silver spoon background
KleoP
September 11, 2004 - 06:59 pm
I think that most people miss what Ms. Stein's art really was. She was the first modern performance artist. But unlike those of today, she did not put her art in a museum--she lived it.
Kleo
Scrawler
September 11, 2004 - 08:36 pm
"The Rue Mouffeard turns into Rue Descartes as you leave Place de la Contrescarpe and head towards the Seine. In a narrow section of small restaurants in number 39, where Hemingway rented an eight-floor room for 60 francs a month. here he composed his first European sketches, using the Corona typewriter (he called it "this mitrial-leuse" - machine gun) Hadley had bought him. In AMF (A Moveable Feast), he remembers the fireplace into which he threw chestnut hulls and mandarin orange peels, and the bottle of kiresch he kept for warming himself at the end of the day." ("A Guide to Hemingway's Paris")
"He remembers 74, Rue due Cardinal Lemoine in AMF a cold water, two-room flat with only a slop jar for a toilet, and "a fine view and a good mattress...and pictures we liked on the wall." (AMF, p.37)
"In AMF an unwelcome conversation was "soothing as the noise of a plank being violated in the sawmill." [113, Rue Notre-Dame-des-Champs] The landlady, madame Chautard, was a "mad woman" whose pet dog Hemingway would immortalize in "The Sun Also Rises." ("A Guide to Hemingway's Paris")
"It was in that room that I learned not to think about anything that I was writing from the time I stopped writing until I started again the next day. That way my subconscious would be working on it and at the same time I would be listening to other people and noticing everything, I hoped; learning, I hoped; and I would read so that I would not think about my work and make myself impotent to it. Going down the stairs when I had worked well, and tht needed luck as well as discipline, was a wonderful feeling and I was free then to walk anywhere in Paris." (AMF, p.13)
I don't think you ever stop being a writer. Part of being a writer is observation. You may not be "scratching" on paper, but are taking in everything and everyone around you and keeping the information within your brain for a later date.
"The one who is doing his work and getting satisfaction from it is not the one the poverty bothers...It was all part of the fight against poverty that you never win except by not spending. Especially if you buy pictures instead of clothes. But then we did not think ever of ourselves as poor. We did not accept it. We thought we were superior people and other people that we looked down on the rightly mistrusted were rich." (AMF, pp. 50-51)
I think that the most important part of this sentence is that: "the one who is doing his work and getting satisfaction from it..." This so very important, not only for writers, but for anyone who works. It doesn't really matter what you do as long as you get some satifaction from it.
MountainRose
September 11, 2004 - 08:57 pm
. . . nowhere in Europe is beer normally served as cold as it is in the U.S., but Germans serve it at whatever temperature a cellar might be, which is a bit chillier than the ambient temperature. So if it's 75 degrees, the cellar might be 55 or 60, and that's how it's served because it's usually also stored there.
On the rare occasions when I drink beer I prefer it NOT ice cold from the refrigerator because I can't taste it when it's that cold and might just as well be drinking water. But to taste it, it has to be a really GOOD beer without an artificial aftertaste that many commercial beers have here.
Harold Arnold
September 12, 2004 - 09:08 am
MmeW, thanks for your message #99 about the Alexandria Quartet chronology. Quite right, “Clea” was the last of the four novels and my memory of the details are at best vague.
Scrawler, A flat above a sawmill would not be my choice for a place to live. I am most sensitive to external sounds particularly if they were coming a sawmill. This raises a question in my mind; were the Hemingway’s night or day people. I suppose I have been thinking they were at least semi-night people going out most every evening to the cafes. A life of going to bed well past midnight would be difficult if a sawmill began operating at 8 AM the next morning.
On second thought perhaps the Hemingway’s were not night people in the sense I described above. Didn’t Hemingway in the book note the time of his visits to miss Stein as 5:00 PM in the afternoon? This would allow time for a café visit, and arrival home by 9:00 PM.
On another subject, regarding Hemingway’s policy of forgetting completely his current writing problem upon the completion of his work period. I might agree in part but not completely.. Hemingway is advising, leaving your work at the office. While this might be ok for civil service or factory workers, it seems to me unduly restrictive for the creative professional in any field be it writing or otherwise. The creative juices can began to flow at any time. In my case the solutions to the apparent insoluble problems of the previous day sometimes suddenly appeared within minutes of awaking after a good night’s sleep.
Mountain Rose, thank for your comment on beer temperature preference in Europe. I suspect that you are right in interpreting Hemingway’s comment concerning the cold beer available at the Lilas as meaning the temperature of the cellar, only slightly lower than the ambient in the café above. It was quite probably was nowhere near what I would consider cold on a hot summer day in South Texas.
KleoP
September 12, 2004 - 09:52 am
Harold--
I don't think Hemingway was forgetting his current writing problem. He was purposefully not putting it foremost in his mind to allow his subconscious to do the work for him. When you woke up Harold, with your wonderful ideas, you had been letting your subconscious work on the idea for 8 hours or so. This is what Hemingway was hoping to achieve. When I have a real bear of a problem I do the same thing. I stop thinking about it--because no amount of continued thinking will force a solution. My creativity is not something that I consciously wield like my left brain directing the flow of my pen through a maze or a math problem. If that were all there was to writing, one could teach people to be great writers in school. But one can't. If my mind is churning over, I go to sleep on it. The problem solves itself, usually in my dreams, sometimes when I just wake up.
Kleo
MountainRose
September 12, 2004 - 10:14 am
. . . problem, I think artists of any sort have various ways of working, with some creating by discipline and constant practice and some allowing more room for the subconscious, and mostly using the two together.
I know in my own case I have carried a painting around in my mind for as long as ten years, just allowing it to sit there vaguely, without necessarily doing anything at all about it. Then one day it needs to come out and it flows without any effort at all, and I know when that time is. But in the meantime I need the discipline to constantly practice also, not on "any particular painting" but in general, to keep my hands connected with my brain and also to refine techniques, because one can't do a final art work without being totally familiar with techniques and media.
I do believe Einstein's theory of relativity came to him while he was bathing, but only after he had done years of disciplined work on it beforehand. So the subconscious and discipline seem to work together, and without the discipline the subconscious has nothing to work with.
Harold, I feel the same way about noise, one of the reasons I couldn't live in the city anymore. I can't imagine living over a sawmill. My TV is not connected (hasn't been for some 30 years although I do watch movies sometimes), and I only very rarely have the radio on. Nature noises such as wind in trees or rushing water are wonderful, but otherwise I like quiet surroundings. Even my computer speakers are turned off, so when I'm at someone else's house while they are on the computer, I'm always slightly surprised by the sound effects. LOL
I noticed that Hemmingway is often in a cafe by himself, even when he isn't writing, and I can't help but wonder where Hadley is during those times. Did they have a child by that time and she was with him?
Scamper
September 12, 2004 - 10:37 am
I was fascinated in A Moveable Feast with Hemingway's discussion of how he performed his writing. I especially liked his saving an idea to start the next day with. I don't think I've read of such techniques by other writers, and for some reason it makes me like Hemingway better. I guess it makes him seem more human, and, well, logical.
Mountain Rose, I continue to be fascinated by your writing and your background. Wish I could have you over for a cup of tea!
Pamela
KleoP
September 12, 2004 - 11:03 am
The writer is unique in her discipline in some ways, thoughs. While I have to read, learn and practice new sewing techniques and research old ones, a writer of modern novels needs to sit around on his butt in cafes observing human beings. Hemingway is working on his craft when he is not writing. It just requires a rather unique type of practice.
Kleo
MountainRose
September 12, 2004 - 11:36 am
I'll be right over. LOL
Kleo, yes, I agree that part of a writer's job is to observe people, to watch their personalities, how they react, and how they connect with each other. I guess a Paris cafe is as good a place as any to meet people or just see them and begin playing with a story, such as Hem's ruminations about the pretty girl he saw waiting for someone.
In fact, I think Europe in general is an easier place to meet people than in the U.S.A., at least the way I remember it. It may have changed since then. But I recall going into a restaurant with my parents, and if the place was filled, my father would just ask if we could sit at a table where there were empty chairs, even if the table was taken. And other people often sat with us. When one shares a meal with strangers they usually aren't strangers for very long. this is common practice in the restaurants that I recall.
I've deliberately done experiments like that here, where I have both offered to share my table in a crowded restaurant, or asked if I could sit with someone. In almost ALL cases people looked at me as though I was from Mars. So when I decide to do that I have to be feeling very brazen and confident because I know I will most likely be rejected or looked at in a puzzling way. Only once did a gentleman invite me to sit after I asked, and it turned out he was Hungarian. It also turned out that we had a lot in common, having immigrated at about the same time, our love for the U.S.A., never having gone back, etc., etc.
It's also a good way to see, after a bit of conversation, whether a relationship is worth pursuing. It may or may not be, and one can feel perfectly free to walk away if it isn't, having had a meal together in a public place, but without any obligation. Personally I think it's a much more civilized way to be than to have each person or couple or family sit in a restaurant making their own private bubble. I've often wondered why people bother going out if they just go out to continue their private bubbles. One might just as well stay at home then.
But maybe that's just me. When I decide to go out somewhere it's mostly because I want some sort of contact with others, and I don't mind being friendly or sharing my space.
Harold Arnold
September 12, 2004 - 02:20 pm
I'm getting a real kick out of the material on the cafes. In a later chapter that we will discuss next week he actually mentions the item featured on the special that day. I am going to do some Web research to see if I can find a recipe or more information on exactly what it was.
In the 1960’s and 70’s, I always tried to get a week trip to the city I have called Paris, USA, better known locally as New Orleans. I scheduled these trips just after New Years during which I would hang-out much like Hemingway did in Paris except I did not spend time writing. I always stayed at a Master Host affiliate Hotel on Rampart Street accessible to both the French Quarter and the Fair Grounds Race track by walking; The distance to say, St Louis Cathedral (a few blocks from the Royal Street Jazz photo location) was about one mile. I would wander the quarter with my Nikon taking pictures and stopping at night to listen to Jazz. I have some pretty good available light photos of interior jazz shots in addition to the Royal Street shot I linked previously.
In the other direction from the Hotel was the Fair Grounds. It was a longer walk of at least two miles to the north along Esplanade Avenue and then to the east to The Fairgrounds. I enjoyed this daily walk leaving about 11:00 AM and arriving before the first race began in time for a poor boy sandwich washed down with a cold Jax’s beer.
My race track experience was not as successful financially as Hemingway appears to have been. Occasionally I would leave with a few dollars on the plus side but this was not the usual case. During a stretch of about 5 years spanning 1970 I got my tips from an old retired Catholic priest. I never saw him bet, but he seemed very horse savvy and during the period never missed a day. From our first conversation, he was not shy about passing on tips. Then one year he was not there and my daily deficits increased noticeably.
Of the several big name French Quarter Restaurants the one I liked the best was the Court of the Two Sisters. Its restaurant entrance was from Royal street. One reason I liked it best was there was never a long line of tourists waiting to be seated My favorite dish was a Pompano filet baked in paper with a cream sauce with shrimp and oysters; it carried a prestigious French title that I’m sure translated into an unimpressive “Pompano in Paper” in English. They had a long wine list but since I was never very wine literate, as Hemingway seems to have been, I generally settled for the house offering, probably poured from a bottle with a Gallo label.
Another more ordinary café where the locals were more apt to frequent was just a block east on Rampart at the intersection with Barracks Street. Here the furnishings were simple with red, checkered tablecloths. The menu including Cajun dishes such as Gumbo, a heady thick, black soup with floating pieces of dismembered crabs in the shells, shrimp (the locals would say “shrimps”), oysters, and more
These January trips continued through most of the 70’s and even a few times in the 80’s. In the 90’s after I retired, I was there several times with a Friend from Baltimore. During the earlier years, I had never been afraid of walking alone even at night anywhere in the French Quarter. In the 90’s things were different; the papers were full of reports of robberies and murders. It was not the same and my friend was more aware of the security situation than I. She was adamantly against walking, meaning our trips were most often Grey Line tours of local and area attractions and museums. Also though the Rampart Street renovated Hotel operating under a new name was still there, the local Cajun café had ceased to exist, meaning most of our after dark meals were in the hotel.
I suppose that my friend's caution was well advised as on our departure while waiting in the airport, my friend called my attention to a headline in a newspaper telling of the murder of a priest the night before. He was returning on foot to his church just a few blocks from our Rampart street hotel. The murder suspect was a teenager who had escaped the scene on a bicycle.
Scamper
September 12, 2004 - 06:11 pm
Harold, when I was 15 years old my girl scout troop floated down the Mississippi to New Orleans on an old paddle steamer. The one place we ate in New Orleans that I remember was The Court of Two Sisters! It's too bad the world is such an unsafe place now. But those memories are precious,
Pamela
Scrawler
September 12, 2004 - 06:20 pm
"I don't worship Joyce. I like him very much as a friend and think no one can write better, technically, I learned much from him, from Ezra, in conversation principally, from G. Stein...Learned a lot from her before she went haywire. Learned nothing from old Ford except mistakes not to make what he had made. Learned from Anderson but ididn't last long. Imitated Ring Lardner as a kid but dind't learn from him. Nothing to learn because he doesn't know anything. All he has is a good false ear and has been around. The poor guy really hates everything but purity. Learned from D.H. Lawrence about how to say what you felt about country." ("Selected Lettters, Arnold Gingrich, 1933, pp. 384-385)
"Dostoevosky was made by being sent to Siberia. Writers are forged in injustice as a sword is forged." ("Green Hills of Africa, p. 71)
"I thought about Tolstoi and about what a great advantage an experience of war was to a writer. It was one of the major subjects and certainly one of the hardest to write truly of and those writers who had not seen it were always very jealous and tried to make it seem unimportant, or abnormal, or a disease as a subject while, really, it was just something quite irreplaceble that they had missed." ("Green Hills of Africa", p. 70)
"All modern American literature comes from one book by Mark Twain called "Huckleberry Finn." If you read it you must stop where the Nigger Jim is solen from the boys. That is the real end. The rest is just cheating. But it's the best book we've had. All American writing comes from that. There was nothing before. There has been nothing as good since." ("Green Hills of Africa, p. 22)
"...we have had, in America, skillful writers. Poe is a skillful writer. It is skillful, marvelously constructed, and it is dead...Occasionally it is there, alone, unwrapped in pudding, and it is good. This is Melville. But the people who praise it, praise it for the rhetoric which is not there...
"Emerson, Hawthorne, Whitter, and Company...all these men were gentlemen, or wished to be. They were all very respectable. They did not use the words that people always have used in speech, the words that survive in language. Nor would you gather that they had bodies. They had minds, yes. Nice, dry, clean minds...
"The good writers are Henry James, Stephen Crane, and Mark Twain. That's not the order they're good in. There is no order for good writers." ("Green Hills of Africa, p. 22)
I would gather that Hemingway likes the writers who could write "of the salt of the earth" so speak. He prefered those writers who wrote stories rich in realism. I think at times he may have been harsh in his thoughts about Ford, Ring Larner, and especially Emerson, Hawthorne, and Whittier. I would, however, have to agree with him that Henry James and Mark Twain are excellent writers but I can't say the same for Stephen Crane. We should also note that many of these writers were from different periods of time, so their writings would reflect their own time rather than the time in which Hemingway wrote.
MountainRose
September 13, 2004 - 04:56 pm
One can criticize the writer's technique as far as rules of writing go, but the creative part and the way in which it is expressed is his/her own. One can criticize technique in painting, but the creative idea and it's expression is unique and does reflect the time in which an artist lives, and I feel only history can truly judge where each artist fits in. Even that is imprecise because some work survives and some, for various reasons, may not survive even though it is good and fit into its particular time slot.
So I don't like comments about fellow creative artists, when it really boils down to a matter of opinion, and so, of course, I disagree with some of Hemmingway's assessments of other writers. It's one thing to say, "I don't like this." and quite another to say "He wasn't a very good writer."
Personally I don't participate in "juried shows" because of my opinion regarding a creative effort being judged as the "best" when it's usually just one person's opinion, and nothing more. Creative effort is just that; someone's creative expression which is personal and which may or may not communicate anything, and may or may not be worthy as far as history goes.
I have very little use for critics of the arts except insofar that I will read book reviews just to see if it might be a subject I would be interested in, no matter if the critic judges it to be "good" or "bad", since I'm quite capable of judging for myself how useful it might be to me. I think a lot of criticism of artists by other artists is just catty, and Hemmingway, although entitled to his opinion, is judging from his personal likes and dislikes, and has nothing to do with whether the writers mentioned deserve the labels he gives them. His remarks about other writers reflects more on himself than on the writers he is critical of.
Deems
September 13, 2004 - 05:22 pm
I agree with this one:
"All modern American literature comes from one book by Mark Twain called "Huckleberry Finn." If you read it you must stop where the Nigger Jim is solen from the boys. That is the real end. The rest is just cheating. But it's the best book we've had. All American writing comes from that. There was nothing before. There has been nothing as good since." ("Green Hills of Africa," p. 22)
Hemingway is not alone in judging Twain as "the father of us all." There are a few other contenders, I suppose, but Twain would be my choice.
Harold Arnold
September 13, 2004 - 05:47 pm
I am inclined to agree with Mountain Roses comment regarding art critics, yet we must face the fact that they routinely make or break aspiring artists. Isn’t this particularly true of 3 or 4 NY drama critics? An article released a few hours after the opening night performance often determines whether of not there will be a 2nd night’s performance.
Thinking back I think Hemingway was rather quick to judge the abilities of some of his contemporaries. Was there anyone of them who he said he really liked? Perhaps Scrawler has give us the reason in noting his possible preference for realist mood in weritng. Of course he did not write the 1920’s memoir until many years later, in the 1950 and it remained unpublished until 1964 several years after his death. Do you suppose his delay in publishing the book was because of a reluctance to be around to explain these judgments?
About an hour and a half ago we had a violent thunderstorm here in South Texas. Ivan is at least 700 miles away to the Southeast just entering the Gulf. They still say its track will take it to the Florida panhandle or the Mississippi/Alabama coast. I went in an saw the radar images and even though our Texas coast don’t seem really threatened, the Radar image of the thunder showers here seemed to move in unison with the image of the storm. It seems a real killer; I hope none of you are in its path and if you are do heed the warnings of your weather agencies.
The week 2 assignment will be pages 59 through 114. This is 6 chapters 7 through 12. I will post details in the heading later tonight.
MmeW
September 13, 2004 - 07:38 pm
Thanks, Scrawler, for your thoughtful post. It was interesting to see all those opinions of EH. I think they give us insight into EH's thought processes. He does seem to be more down-to-earth (saltl of the earth), as opposed to cerebral.
I think when reading critics it is good to recognize "where they are coming from." For example, with Siskel and Ebert, the movie critics, Siskel was a philosophy major at Yale and his reviews were always more cerebral; Ebert seemed more down to earth, so you could take that into consideration when assessing the reviews for yourself.
KleoP
September 13, 2004 - 07:49 pm
Yes, I really miss Siskel for this reason. When I wanted to watch an intelligent movie I went with Siskel's review. When I wanted pure pleasure I used Ebert's. I didn't know Siskel was a philosophy major.
Kleo
Harold Arnold
September 13, 2004 - 07:49 pm
Tomorrow we can move on to the Week 2 Chapters which are Chapters 7 (The end of An Avocation) P 59 through Chapter 12 (Ezra Pound and His Bel Espirit). P113. In these chapters we get more detail on the Hemingway’s life in Paris and a couple of their interesting activities including racing and contacts with Paris friends including a racing buddy, Mike Ward and and Pascin a French artist and his two young French female models (very interesting). Likewise we hear more about the city of Paris including more detail on several racetracks and more on the Paris cafes. Finally this weeks discussion will feature fellow expatriates Ford Madox Ford and Ezra Pound.
I will leave the Discussion Outline for this week’s discussion the same as last week,, First Let Us Discuss the Hemingway’s, Second Let’s Discuss Paris, and third, The Expatriates. I have change the heading details with questions reflecting the new material.
I will add additional Web sourches on Ford Madox Fore and Ezra Pound to our Web Resources List. Also I will link sources on the French Artist Pascin if he is in Google. If any of you have favorite web sources link them in a post, and I will add them to the list.
MmeW
September 13, 2004 - 10:14 pm
This seems like a pretty good
biography of Pascin, and it even mentions Hemingway's description of the night at Le Dome.
Joan Grimes
September 14, 2004 - 07:51 am
Here is a link to a biographical site for Ford Madox Ford.
http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/fford.htm Here is a link to an Ezra Pound page that has a very good photo of him and links to other sites.
http://epc.buffalo.edu/authors/pound/ Here is a link to La Closerie des Lilas. I am trying to find a photo of it that I took but haven't located it yet.
http://www.discoverfrance.net/France/Features/Cafe_Creme_Closerie2.shtml If you scroll down on that last link and click on "A Tribute to La Closerie des Lilas" you will see some wonderful photos of La Closerie.
Joan Grimes
Malryn (Mal)
September 14, 2004 - 08:54 am
MountainRose
September 14, 2004 - 10:17 am
. . . used to follow them faithfully. I suppose critics serve their purpose in just helping us decide what to spend our time with, even if it means spending time with the opposite of what they recommend. That was the case with me and Pauline Kael years ago when she did movie reviews. The movies she raved about were usually the very ones I knew I would hate (there were exceptions), and the ones she didn't like were the ones that I enjoyed tremendously. So I definitely would read her reviews, and then see the opposite of what she recommended. It worked almost every time. LOL
MountainRose
September 14, 2004 - 10:27 am
along with some examples of his drypoint prints:
http://www.fitch-febvrel.com/pascin.html
Scrawler
September 14, 2004 - 01:31 pm
"Racing never came between us [Hemingway and Hadley], only people could do that; but for a long time it stayed close to us like a demanding friend. That was a generous way to think of it. I, the one who was so righteous about people and their destructiveness, tolerated this friend that was the falsest, most beautiful, most exciting, vicious, and demanding because she could be profitable. To make it profitable was more than a fulltime job and I had no time for that. But I justified it to myself because I wrote [about] it...
You had to watch a jumping race from the top of the stands at Auteuil and it was a fast climb to see what each horse did and see the horse that might have won and did not, and see why or maybe how he did not do what he could have done...
...It was beautiful to watch each day they raced when you could be there and see the honest races with the great horses, and you got to know the course as well as any place you had ever known. You knew many people finally, jockeys and trainers and owners and too many horses and too many things.
In principle I only bet when I had a horse to bet on but I sometimes found horses that nobody believed in except the men who trained and rode them that won race after race with me betting on them. I stopped finally because it took too much time..."(AMF, pp. 61-62)
"I have started many stories about bicycle racing but have never written one that is as good as the races are both on the indoor and outdoor tracks and on the roads. But I will get the Velodrome d'Hiver with the smoky light of the afternoon and the high banked wooden track and the whirring sound of the tires made on the wood as the riders passed, the effort and the tactics as the riders climbed and plunged, each one a part of his machine; I will get the magic of the demi-fond, the noise of the motors with their rollers set out behind them that the entraneurs rode, wearing their heavy crash helmets and leaning backward in their ponderous leather suits, to shelter the riders who followed them from the air resistance, the riders in their lighter crash helmets bent low over their handlebars their legs turning the huge gear sprockets and small front wheels touching the roller behind the machine that gave them shelter to ride in, and the duels that were more exciting than anything, the put-putting of the motorcycles and the riders elbow to elbow and wheel to wheel up and down and around at deadly speed until one man could not hold the pace and broke away and the solid wall of air that had sheltered aginst hit him." (AMF, pp. 64-65)
I found it interesting that Hemingway justified betting because he was able to write about the sports he was betting on. While I was reading these passages, I was reminded of the recent Olympics. I too sat in front of the TV mesmerized by the jumping horses and the cycle races. I can't help but wonder how Hemingway would have felt about our modern races with their "sleek fast cycles." Has anyone ever seen any of these races up close and personal?
Harold Arnold
September 14, 2004 - 06:20 pm
MmeM’s link is an interesting biography of Pascin. I see his real name was Julius Mordecai Pincas. I wonder how the nickname, Pascin came out of that? The bio doesn’t tell us, but it tells many interesting facts about him including his US connection.
Click Here for another link with several of Pascin’s work product. Several of the paintings seem typical French expressionism although their small size even after clicking the thumbnail to get a larger pictures makes any evaluation flaky. I worked for 4-years as a docent at the San Antonio Museum of Art during which time we had several exhibits of French Expressionists, but I don’t think I have ever been face to face with one of his paintings. Joan have you ever seen Pascin paintings?
Do you suppose the “Two Young Girls in Repose” painting pictured the models in the Hemingway story?
The Mountain Rose link is interesting as a Galleries advertisement of Pascin’s art. We might be attracted by the relative low price, but I’m sure the dry point process with its multiple copies combine to keep the price of this medium low.. Note the Galleries comment concerning the Estate’s sale of unsigned reproductions of these drawings after his death.
Thank you MmeW and Mountain Rose for these links. I will add all of them to our Links page.
Harold Arnold
September 14, 2004 - 06:25 pm
Regarding Ford Madox Ford I must admit this only marginally literate Texan had never heard of him until I read this book. I got the impression from its reading that Hemingway did not think too much of him. Yet I see in Joan’s link that Hemingway was a deputy-editor of the “Transatlantic Review that Ford edited..
On the other hand I certainly knew of Ezra Pound through his treason indictment and trial for his WW II broadcasts for the Axis powers. It was only the insanity plea that saved his neck. Once in the 1950’s I tried to read his poetry but was unable to sustain interests. There was just too many symbol and abstraction for me; they were just too un-Hemingway like for me. But Hemingway seems to have liked Pound at least as a person and friend.
Thank you Joan for these links that will go on the Links page.
Harold Arnold
September 14, 2004 - 06:36 pm
Scrawler thank you for bring up Hemingway’s interest in racing. It appears to me that in the 1920’s, Hemingway developed a real interest in both horse and bicycle racing, sort of similar to his later interest in Bull Fighting.. His horse racing seems to have been the steeplechase. Like I said he seems to have been quite successful at it. At the time the money from his winnings seems to have been welcome. I tried to find web information on his two racing buddies, Mike Ward and Harold Seearns, but they seem unknown so far as Google is concern.
In the 1960’s I had $300 Raleigh 10 Speed Bicycle that still hangs from my garage wall. I used it for recreational, exercise riding. I found the recent Tour de France a fascinating morning TV experience. It provided a fine incentive to watch it from my own stationary bicycle exerciser. I don’t remember reading any of the Hemingway bicycle racing stories
Harold Arnold
September 14, 2004 - 06:52 pm
Mal, that is a fine picture you posted of the Lilas! There is a wonderful illumination of the upper floors though the sidewalk seems rather dark. Thank you for sharing it.
MmeW
September 14, 2004 - 07:58 pm
It is interesting to read of Hemingway enjoying the bike races. I can only connect the Vélodrome d'Hiver with the "rafle" that happened in 1942: More than 13,000 Jews were kept after being rounded up on July 16 and 17, 1942. After being held three days at the Vel d’hiv, the Jews were transported to Auschwitz. The roundup of the Vel d’hiv has become a symbol of French collaboration in the deportation and eventual extermination of Jews living in France. France annually commemorates the deportation of the Jews on July 16 at an official ceremony in the Place des Martyrs Juifs. (I tried to find info in English, but most of the sites were French.)
fairwinds
September 14, 2004 - 09:05 pm
mmew -- as a resident of france for many years, i must voice my disagreement with the inference that might be made with your statement that "France annually commemorates the deportation of the Jews on July 16 at an official ceremony in the Place des Martyrs Juifs."
the english word commemorates is a bit tricky. to me it implies celebrates. when we commemorate the fourth of july in america or muslims commemorate the end of ramadan the whole idea is that of celebration. commemorating the deportation of the jews would certainly not be a celebration in france. while it is true that the vichy government was guilty of collaboration with the nazis, the people who live in france today, as a whole, are not generally known to be anti-semitic.
the french government declared 16 july Holocaust Commemoration Day in memory of many jews who were deported and eventually died in concentration camps. to me, the word commemoration (in french) is closer in meaning to "remembering" and not "celebrating".
i have enjoyed reading everyone's comments, including yours mme w., and visited this evening to delurk and talk about my favorite plât du jour, cassoulet and my favorite city, paris, where i lived for several years. but the subtleties of this one word made me jump on something else i feel is more important because anti-semitism is such a hot issue in france today.
Joan Grimes
September 14, 2004 - 09:09 pm
Harold,
No I am not familar with Pascin's work. I have only heard about him in this book. I have never seen any of his work in any museum that I have visited. We have not had any in our French exhibitions at the Birmingham Museum of art where I work as a docent. I would like to see some of it in person as it is difficult to tell much about it from those
examples on the Internet.
Fairwinds, we were posting at the same time. I agree with you about the word commemorate for that particular event. It is great to see you posting here. Welcome. Please tell us about your favorite plât du jour, cassoulet and our favorite city Paris. I really enjoy reading what you say about Paris.
Joan Grimes
MmeW
September 14, 2004 - 10:00 pm
Sorry, all. I copied that info from a site that obviously hadn't done a great job translating. No offense meant, and glad you clarified that, Fairwinds, for it certainly sounded callous in English. Did you know that Robert Clary (of Hogan's Heroes) was part of that. It took him nearly forty years to come public about it. He spoke at our school district in the 80s, and it was very moving.
I love cassoulet! The very best I ever had was in a café in Bordeaux; we were never able to match it again. The best part was the proper French waiter declaiming (when he thought I had asked what a "oie" was), "Vous savez, madame, c'est un gros canard!" (You know, madame, it's a big duck) All the while flapping his wings/arms. (I had actually asked what part of the duck was used, getting all confused between the word for liver and goose.)
MmeW
September 14, 2004 - 10:02 pm
There is a stirring memorial to the Deportation des Juifs. I'll send a picture to Harold.
Deems
September 15, 2004 - 04:44 am
Fairwinds--Your comment on "commemorate" was interesting to me. I have always thought of the word as meaning "remember," and generally to remember something that should not be forgotten because of something that was done wrong.
I don't commemorate the 4th of July, I celebrate it.
KleoP
September 15, 2004 - 08:53 am
I, too, cringed, when I first read that the French commemorate any part in their murder of Jews during WWII. 'Commemorate' does connote honor as part of the remembrance. 'Remembrance' can also mean to honor, but it is generally the honoring or remembering of something sad, such as Remembrance Day in Canada (USA's Veterans' Day) with its moment of silence for those who died in war.
On the other hand, I have a French friend who says the day is to remember those who died, not the tragedy of those who killed them. In this case, in spite of the rather harsh implications of the English for the day, maybe commemorate is appropriate, as a wake to celebrate the lives of those who were murdered under such tragic circumstances.
Probably 'Holocaust Remembrance Day' would be preferred.
DL--Aren't you commemorating the signing of the Declaration of Independence when you celebrate the 4th of July?
Thanks to all for the exchange on this matter. It's always fun to nit-pick meanings of words in English and their proper translations from other languages.
Kleo
MmeW
September 15, 2004 - 10:14 am
Webster's gives these definitions of commemorate:
1:to call to remembrance
2:to mark by some ceremony or observation :OBSERVE
3:to serve as a memorial of (a plaque that commemorate sthe battle)
Larousse defines commemorer as "to recall the memory of"
so maybe we are just splitting hairs, though obviously many of us relate to the positive connotation of commemorate.
Edit: < and > were removed and ( and ) were substituted
KleoP
September 15, 2004 - 11:49 am
Oh, Mme W., we are difinitely splitting hairs here. But that's what is so fun about the English language--so many hairs to split.
MSN Encarta gives this as the first definition:
1. remember something ceremonially: to honor the memory of somebody or something in a ceremony
Your link does not work. Maybe you are missing a closing?
Kleo
Scrawler
September 15, 2004 - 02:45 pm
Ford Madox Ford believed that he had played a major role in shaping the most important literary movement of the modern age, a movement he termed impressionism, and been unerring in recognizing and supporting lierary genius, including D.H. Lawrence, Ezra Pound, James Joyce, and Ernest Hemingway.
"The Good Soldier," finished by Ford in 1914 and published on Sept. 17, 1915, is Ford's one great modern novel, a masterstroke of impressionistic fiction that ranks with Joyce's "A Portrait of the Artist" or Henry James's "The Golden Bowl."
"The Good Soldier" knows that "society can only exist if the normal and slightly deceitful flourish, and if the passionate, the headstrong, and the too-truthful are condemned to suicide and to madness." "The Good Soldier," a tale of passion but also sadness reveals the personal and tragic side of the hero irrevocably trapped between duty and feeling.
By 1922, Ford moved to Paris and became the editor of the Transatlantic Review. Though the magazine lasted for only one year, he managed to publish some impressive experimental literature, including poetry by Ezra Pound and E.E. Cummings. For his first issue Ford published a fragment of Joyce's "Finnegans Wake" calling it "Work in Progress."
Harold Arnold
September 15, 2004 - 06:16 pm
Thank you Fairwinds for joining us. Please do not hesitate to post when ever you are inclined
And thank you for mentioning Cassoulet. Cassoulet appears to be a combination of” white beans, pork and duck or goose according to this Web site on Toulouse Culture,
Click Here. It mentions the propensity for Toulouse cuisine to be well seasoned with garlic. MmeW by her post seems to have liked it, although the seriously comic waiter may have contributed to the enjoyment, I think I would like it..
Harold Arnold
September 15, 2004 - 06:56 pm
I said the other day that I had never heard of Ford Madox Ford until I read our current book. While that may be true, it was perhaps because of my inattention rather than the fact that he was not mentioned in my literature textbook, “Writers of the Western World.” I see he was mentioned in the editors description of the Impressionists mood near the end of the Book, but none of writings are included as examples. Writers that were included were excerpts from the Bible, Joseph Conrad, Stephen Crane, Katherine Mansfield, and Thomas Wolf.
Deems, this US Navy Academy edition of “Writers of the Western World” reflects WW II austerity in its 1000 thin pages and small light print. I can hardly read it today. Did you find any additional record of the history of this edition?
Harold Arnold
September 15, 2004 - 07:01 pm
I think the principal English dictionary definition of the verb “commemorate” implies remembrance. The on-line, Merriam Webster dictionary says, “to call to remembrance.” Yet the thesaurus includes “ celebrate” as a synonym.
As Fairwinds indicated in the earler post this English word is a bit tricky and this is a good example. While a better choice or arrangement of words might have been preferable, the intent was to note the French Day of Commemoration as a day of remembrance of the victims of the WW II atrocity that resulted in the death of so many French Jews
MmeW
September 15, 2004 - 09:07 pm
Kleo, I don't know what the heck happened. That wasn't meant to be a link and I don't know how it turned blue!
Hunger: I thought the discussion of hunger was so interesting—almost a prescient description of the current problem of obesity, that people are eating when their hunger is not physical.
Then when they won some money at the racetrack, at first he thought it was "simple hunger," but even after they had eaten at Michaud's, "the feeling that had been like hunger on the bridge was still there."
I love what Hadley said: "There are so many sorts of hunger. In the spring there are more."
I also liked her comment: "When you and Chink talked I was included. It wasn't like being a wife at Miss Stein's." That alone is enough to convince me that Stein wasn't as avant garde as she thought.
I was starving the whole time I lived in France, physically, so I could relate to his pangs at skipping lunch, and the wonderful beer and potato salad at Lipp's. Since I was working and going to school, I didn't have time to walk past the patisseries and drool. I do remember how delicious a $1.50 4-course meal at a neighborhood dive tasted. Oh, yum!
Can't believe I never made it to the Closerie des Lilas, unless it was the place (which it might have been) where I got Sartre's autograph (was taken there by relatives of a French friend from home).
Scrawler
September 16, 2004 - 01:04 pm
Of all the major literary figures in the 20th Century, Ezra Pound has been one of the most controversial; he has also been one of modern poetry's most important contributors.
"Ezra Pound was always a good friend and he was always doing things for people. The studio where he lived with his wife Dorothy on the rue Notre-Dame-des-Champs...had very good light and was heated by a stove and it had paintings by Japanese artists that Ezra knew." (AMF, p.107)
"Ezra founded something called Bel Esprit with Miss Natalie Baney. Many American and French women with money enough had salons and I [Hemingway] figured very early that they were excellent places for me to stay away from.
The idea of Bel Espirt was that we would all contribute a part of whatever we earned to provide a fund to get Mr. Eliot [T.S. Eliot] out of the bank so he would have money to write poetry...(AMF, pp. 110-12)
Pound taught Hemingway "to distrust adjectives," and Hemingway taught Pound to box. (AMF, pp. 107-09)
"Pound is one of the few expatriates Hemingway does not attack in AMF. He praises him as "kinder and more Christian than I was." Pound was "irascible but so perhaps have been many saints." While Hemingway was writing the book, Pound was still confined as criminally insane to St. Elizabeths in Washington D.C. Hemingway, working for the saint's release, conceded, "Pound's crazy. All poets are...They have to be. You don't put a poet like Pound in the loony bin. For history's sake we shouldn't keep him there." (Baker, Ernest Hemingway, p. 539)
In his "Life of Ezra Pound," Noel Stock recalled that in 1925, the first issure of "This Quarter" was dedicted to "Ezra Pound who by his creative work, his editorship of several magazines, his helpful friendship for young and unknown...comes first to our mind as meriting the gratitude of this generation." Included among the tributes to Pound wsa a statement of appreciation from Ernest Hemingway: "We have Pound the major poet devoting, say, one-fifth of his time to poetry. With the rest of his time he tries to advance the fortunes, both material and artistic, of his friends. He defends them when they are attacked, he gets them into magazines and out of jail. He loans them money. He sells their pictures...He advances them hospital expenses and dissuades them from suicide. And in the end a few of them refrain from knifing him at the first opportunity."
Pound, an admirer of Mussolini, lived in fascist Italy beginning in 1925. When World War II broke out, Pound stayed in Italy, retaining his U.S. citizenship, and broadcsting a series of controversial radio commentaries. These commentaries often attacked Roosevelt and the Jewish bankers whom Pound held responsible for the war. By 1943, the U.S. government deemed the broadcasts to be treasonous; at war's end the poet was arrested by the U.S. Army and kept imprisoned in a small, outdoor wire cage at a compound near Pisa, Italy. Eventually judged to be mentally incompetent to stand trial, Pound was incarcerated in St. Elizabeth's Hospital. He stayed in the hospital until 1958 when Robert Frost led a successful effort to free the poet. (Biography Resource Center)
Are all poets, artists, and writers crazy? Or is it that we feel more passionately about the world around us. And sometimes our passions run "amuck."
MountainRose
September 16, 2004 - 02:07 pm
. . . was an interesting question: "Are all poets, artists, and writers crazy? Or is it that we feel more passionately about the world around us. And sometimes our passions run "amuck."
I do believe sometimes passions can run amuck, but most of the time it's just that poets, artists, writers, etc. really do see the world differently, and that's not welcomed by the solid ordinary citizenry because they don't understand it and because its inconvenient to most social interaction or family interaction, as well as politica interaction.
An in-depth psychological study of creative people that I read several years ago (I can't recall the title) yielded these quotations which I keep on a bulletin board above my computer:
"One reason that the link between genius and insanity persists in many minds is that creative people do behave in ways that are out of the ordinary. The pattern of most artist's lives falls out of the cycle with that of ordinary people, since artists often continue to be productive without considering the usual human needs or time schedules, and may artistic geniuses have no skill in dealing with the outside world, other than through their creative media."
"Creative people are usually more vulnerable than the rest of us. Since their productivity benefits us all, anything emotional that interferes with thier creativity deprives us all. Creative persons seem to lack adequate means to protect themselves, not only from the outside world, but also from themselves."
"Some writers complained that excessive sociability was a problem. They needed substantial blocks of time and isolation from human contact to accomplish their work."
Isolating yourself from others is considered "odd" and "suspect" in our society. Personally I take advantage of that. Whenever I wish to be excused socially I use my "artist" persona as my reason, usually with a smile and the comment, "Oh, you know how us artists are". People do think it a bit eccentric, but it's also usually OK with them, especially with the friends who know me well and are also artists of some sort. They give me the breathing room which my family never was willing to give me.
As for Pound being a fascist, he would have been wise to keep his mouth shut in those times, and would also have been wiser to realize that if he had NOT agreed with the fascists, he would have been one of the first to be arrested by them. Because of the fact that he did not realize all he should have, he had to pay the price.
I don't know much about him, but I wonder if he was really diagnosed as being mentally ill or if it was just a convenient political diagnosis that was handy to incarcerate him. Communism certainly was famous for doing that to its artists and writers. I guess I'll have to look up some information about Pound to see what actually happened, because according to Hemmingway he certainly seems to have been a kind and caring sort of person, although I loved Hemingways humorous commentary about Bel Esprit and its purpose in rescuing Eliot from a banking career along with his caustic humorous commentary about the "little Greek temple". LOL
Harold Arnold
September 16, 2004 - 04:40 pm
I interpret “Bel Esprit” to mean literally “a good Spirit.” In the way it is used in the book it means a good deed, in this case the collection funds to enable a promising fellow writer, T.S. Eliot, to escape from his wage slave position in a London bank, come to Paris, and write. A noble cause, although apparently the fund never equaled the sum necessary to achieve its goals, a fact that proved moot since a fortuitous publication of a major writing bought Elliot’s freedom,
I have to agree that after reading the “Bel Esprit” chapter I am more inclined to view Pound in a more favorable light. Previously my opinion had been tainted by his decision to remain in Italy actively engaged in the broadcasting of propaganda against the US. All through the War years we heard from our radio and press how he and a Pacific war counterpart, Tokyo Rose, would be so charged at the War’s end. Ezra was so indicted for Treason bringing about an insanity hearing that judged him legally insane. As a result he spent 12 years in a mental institution before he was finally released. He returned to Italy where he lived until 1972.
Was Pound crazy? Well there was an American Jury decision to the effect that he was; but after a quick browsing read of. “What Did Ezra Pound Really Say?” (
http://www.ety.com/HRP/rev/epound.htm ) I am inclined to think maybe he was more confused than crazy at least so far as the theme of his broadcasts were concern. I will agree he was crazy in the sense that Hemingway meant when he said all Poets are craze, but that is a far cry from crazy as defined by the US judicial system,
Some of you might remember the Pacific War Japanese-American Woman Tokyo Rose who made similar broadcasts for the Japanese. She was a Japanese-American US citizen who made similar broadcasts for the Japanese. Perhaps because I was in the Pacific at the end of the War, I remember her even more than Pound. At her trial for treason she was found innocent on 7 counts and guilty on only one. She received a 10 year sentence and a $10,000 fine. She was paroled in 1956 and pardoned by President Ford in 1977. Of the two, Pound through his insanity plea ended up serving the mostime.
Tokyo Rose
http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/20020221.html
Harold Arnold
September 16, 2004 - 08:24 pm
Back to Ford, the guy who liked that name so much he went to court to get it legally in his name twice! Chapter 9, “Ford Madox Ford, The Devil’s Disciple” is a good argument for reading this book as Hemingway suggested, as if it were a novel. I love some of the alcohol inspired dialog exchange between Hemingway and Ford in which they discuss such subjects as the difference between a cad and a bounder and how a Gentleman would respond to either.
This led Hemingway to bring in Pound asking, ‘Is Ezra a gentleman.” “Of course not,” Ford answered, “He’s an American.”
“Can an American be a gentleman?,” Hemingway asked, “perhaps,” Ford conceded going on to suggest an American Ambassador as perhaps worthy of the status. And in response to another direct question concerning the status of Henry James on that matter, Ford after hesitation allows a “very nearly."
Now the conversation continued, as the participants drink great quantities of brandy, to the climax when Hemingway asked, “Are you a a gentlemen?
Without hesitation Ford replied, “naturally, I have held His Majesties commission.”
“Its all very complicated” Hemingway responds, “am I a gentleman” Absolutely not Ford replied. --- and yada/yada/yada --- “You might be considered a gentleman in Italy.”
That brandy must have been pretty potent stuff!
This type dialog laden writing continues in the next chapter 10, Birth Of A New School.” Here Hemingway is writing in a café when a young man, a stranger interrupts addressing him as “Hem.”
Hemingway is annoyed by the interruption but the young man persists with conversation. As the conversation progresses the young man reveals a certain familiarity in Hemingway’s writings with critical comments on them. Hemingway becomes less annoyed and more interested, and I write in the margin of my book, “Who is this guy? Is he a some body or just a nobody?
I think this was exactly what Hemingway intended his readers to be asking as in the end Hemingway reveals what he was thinking. “
“It would be interesting and instructive if the young man had turned out to be a famous critic but it did not turn out that way although I had high hopes for awhile.
MountainRose
September 17, 2004 - 09:19 am
. . . originally in England had a different meaning than it has today or than it probably had in Hemmingway's time. A "gentleman" was a man who owned a certain amount of property and had reached a particular educational level. So when a man was referred to as a "gentleman" it had a meaning as to exactly where he fit into society.
Somewhere along the way some people thought that was unfair and prejudiced and began referring to most men as "gentleman", thus losing its original meaning to where the word finally meant nothing much at all in comparison. This comes from an explanation by C.S. Lewis which I will look up again and maybe quote directly.
I'm wondering if Ford had some sort of specific definition in his head for what a "gentleman" is.
I thought the exchange between Hemmingway and the young man whose identity we don't know was pretty rude on both their parts. The young man was rude when he refused to pass by the moment he noticed Hemmingway was working (body language and Hem's words should have told him that immediately if he had any sensitivity), and Hemmingway was certainly rude when he told the young man to find another cafe. I do sort of wonder what the Frenchman looking on thought about these two rude foreigners.
Harold Arnold
September 17, 2004 - 02:24 pm
Mountain Rose, your are right Hemingway was certainly very rude actually telling him, “Listen, a bitch like you has plenty of places to go. Why do you have to come here and louse a decent café?”
Man, that’s being about as rude as you can get. I’m surprised the conversation continued. The young man was certainly persistent to have continued after that.
I wondered about his nationality and I have deduced from the dialog that he must have been American. The conversation appears to have been in English since if it had been in French Hemingway in writing for us in English would likely have opened the first dialog with some French words before switching to English. I think from the young man’s words that he was speaking American English rather than the UK version. Also the man seems to have known Hemingway at least to the extent of knowing where he lived above the sawmill. And we know he too was a writer and when Hemingway made the mistake of asking what
he was writing the young man replied, “I’m writing the best I can. Just as you do. But its so terribly difficult.”
Yes the young man must have been another young American, like Hemingway living in Paris, trying to establish himself as a writer. I think we can conclude he was unsuccessful and quickly
disappeared from the Paris scene. In this chapter we see Hemingway as the egotistical artist, well aware of his great ability, prematurely claiming the perks and privileges of the gifted class
Scrawler
September 17, 2004 - 03:10 pm
"I mopped up all the oil and all of the sauce with bread and drank the beer slowly until it began to lose its coldness and then I finished it and orded a demi and watched it drawn. It seemed colder than the distingue and I drank half of it." (AMF, pp. 72-73)
"After you came out of the Luxembog you could walk down the narrow rue Ferou to the Place St. Sulipice and there were still no restaurants, only the quiet square with its benches and trees. There was a fountain with lions, and pigeons walked on the pavement and perched on the statues of the bishops. There was the church and there were shops selling religious objects and vestments on the north side of the square." (AMF, 69-70)
"You got very hungry when you did not eat enough in Paris because all the bakery shops had such good things in the windows and...you saw and smelled the food...
You could not go further toward the river without passing shops selling fruits, vegetables, wines, or bakery and pastry shops. But by choosing your way carefully...you did not pass too many places where things to eat were sold." (AMF, 69-70)
"I went on up the street looking in the windows and happy with the spring evening and the people coming past. In the three principal cafes I saw people that I knew by sight and others that I knew to speak to. But there were always much nicer-looking people that I did not know that, in the evening with the lights just coming on, were hurrying to some place to drink together, to eat together and then to make love. The people in the principal cafes might do the same thing or they might just sit and drink and talk and love to be seen by others. The people that I liked and had not met went to the big cafes because they were lost in them and no one noticed them and they could be alone in them and be together. The big cafes were cheap then too, and all had good beer and the aperitifs cost reasonable prices that were clearly marked on the saucers that were served with them." (AMF, 99-100)
The way Hemingway describes Paris makes my senses tingle. I can taste, smell, hear, and see Paris for myself. I feel I can almost reach out and touch the city; if only in my own mind. I too like to sit alone in small restaurants and sit back and listen to the various conversations that are going on at the same time. I like to observe the people too - from the young mother who is trying to control her children - to the two lovers who sit and hold hands - to the young man who is desparately trying to explain something to a tearful young lady - to an older couple who say nothing as they eat smiling once and awhile at each other.
Harold Arnold
September 18, 2004 - 08:01 am
Scrawler, I think the tingle from Hemingway’s writing comes from the way he puts his sentences together to make verbal images in the reader’s mind. The artist uses different colored paints on canvas to form a picture; Hemingway uses words strung together in sentences on a printed page to form his image.
I think the short Hemingway paragraph he wrote in 1922 as a war correspondent covering the Greek withdrawal from Turkey that I have mentioned before best illustrates his ability to create verbal images in the minds of his readers:
All day long I have been passing them, dirty, tired, unshaven, wind-bitten soldiers, hiking along the trail across the brown, rolling, barren, Thrace countryside. No bands, no relief organizations, no leave areas, nothing but lice, dirty blankets, and mosquitoes at night. They are the last of the glory that was Greece. This is the end of their second siege of Troy.
Here we have a total of 61 words in four short sentences averaging about 15 words each. The reader is left with a mental picture of the Greek retreat across the barren Thrace countryside, the agony of the individual soldiers, and the futility of the mission they were on, as well as the final consequence of the inevitable withdrawal. There may well have been no photographs illustrating this article when it appeared in the newspaper. Yet the readers were left with mental image of what was going on.
Harold Arnold
September 18, 2004 - 08:47 am
Perhaps the major consequence of the loss of Hemingway’s manuscript when Hadley’s suitcase was stolen from a Railway station was the loss of Hemmingway’s first novel. Later back in Paris Hemingway rationalized this loss as for the best:
I still had the lyric facility of boyhood that was as perishable and as deceptive as youth was. I knew it was probably a good thing that it was lost, ---
But Hemingway knew he must write his first novel though at the time it seemed to him an impossible thing to do. It seemed impossible because he was still struggling (he says “with difficulty”) to prefect his style by writing “paragraphs that would be the distillation of what makes a novel” In other words he was perfecting his style by writing longer and longer stories. He compared his plan to the long distance runner training by taking on successively longer and longer training exercises. Hemingsway’s training period delayed the publication of his first novel until 1926 when “The Sun Also Rises” was published.
I have never read “The Sun Also Rises.” but I understand it is about the lost generation expatriates in Paris in the 20’s. This makes it on the same subject as AMF, our present book. Perhaps some of you who have read it might comment on the characters in the novel, In the fictional work are there characters that might be identified as Stein, Pound, Madox, Fitzgerald or Hemingway himself? AND IN PATICULAR is there a character that might be identified as the young man in Chapter 10 who annoyed Hemingway while he was trying to write in the Lilas?
Scrawler
September 18, 2004 - 10:03 am
"Lady Brett Ashley, in "The Sun Also Rises", voices [Hemingway's thoughts on] morality after she has decided to leave a young bullfighter, believing the break to be in his best interests. She says: "You know it makes one feel rather good deciding not to be a bitch...It's sort of what we have instead of God."
Both of Hemingway's first two major novels, "The Sun Also Rises" and "A Farewell to Arms," were "primarily descriptions of a society that had lost the possibility of belief. They were dominated by an atmospehere of Gothic ruin, boredom, sterility and decay," John Aldridge wrote. "Yet if they had been nothing more than descriptions, they would inevitably have been as empty of meaning as the thing they were describinging." While Alan Lebowiz contended that because the theme of despair "is always an end in itself, the fiction merely its transcription,...it is a dead end," Aldridge believed that Hemingway managed to save the novels by salvaging the characters values and transcribing them "into a kind of moral network that linked them together in a unified pattern of meaning."
In the search for meaning Hemingway's characters necessarily confront violence. Omnipresent violence is a fact of existence, according to Hemingway. Even in works such as "The Sun Also Rises" in which violence plays a minimal role, it is always present subliminally -- "woven into the structure of life itself," William Barrett remarked."
( Biography Resource Center)
I believe that evil will always exist, but good exists because of evil. It is the struggle between good and evil that makes the world what it is.
"Death is not the ultimate fear: the Hemingway hero knows how to confront death. What he truly fears is "nada" - existence in a state of non-being. Hemingway's characters are alone. He is not concerned with human relationships as much as with portraying man's individual struggle against an alien, chaotic universe. His characters exist in the "island condition," Stephen L. Tanner has noted. He compared them to islands of an archipelago "consistently isolated [and] alone in the stream of society." (Biograhpy Resource Center)
MountainRose
September 18, 2004 - 10:47 am
Regarding this: "He is not concerned with human relationships as much as with portraying man's individual struggle against an alien, chaotic universe." --- Wonder why he felt the universe was alien and chaotic. I feel just the opposite---that it's orderly and well designed and that what we believe is chaos is not really so at all, but has a place in the big design that we just cannot see because of human limitations. If the above was Hem's view, it seems very pessimistic to me.
"His characters exist in the "island condition," Stephen L. Tanner has noted. He compared them to islands of an archipelago "consistently isolated [and] alone in the stream of society." ---- When it comes right down to brass tacks I think we are all islands in some ways and not at all in other ways. We may be islands in this material world and in society, and every man and woman ultimately dies alone. But if one believes that everything is interconnected, then we aren't islands at all in spite of seeing ourselves that way. Limited vision is part of the human condition, but I won't give in to it by insisting that's all there is, and I can't understand those who do.
So again, I think that's a very pessimistic viewpoint, and on that note I'm not sure I'd enjoy Hemmingway's books. I simply don't see the world that way, and I think it's a sort of "feeling sorry for oneself in this big chaotic universe" philosophy instead of thinking of life as the great gift that it is, even with all its limitations and all its pain.
But that's just a personal opinion on my part. I simply can't relate to that sort of negativity. It smacks of the sort of nihilism that seems to be part of the modern world, which I don't understand and don't wish to understand because I feel it's useless and self-defeating. Just as man has to constantly push himself above the forces of gravity, man also has to constantly push himself up from negativity against some tremendous odds. But to me that's what being human is all about.
Did Hemmingway change his mind at any time as he got older, or did he keep that sort of dark vision? Because if he kept it, all of a sudden I'm not at all surprised about his suicide.
Harold Arnold
September 18, 2004 - 04:28 pm
Thank you Scrawler for the comments on the philosophy Hemingway incorporated into his novels:
Death is not the ultimate fear: the Hemingway hero knows how to confront death. What he truly fears is "nada" - existence in a state of non-being. Hemingway's characters are alone. He is not concerned with human relationships as much as with portraying man's individual struggle against an alien, chaotic universe. His characters exist in the "island condition," Stephen L. Tanner has noted. He compared them to islands of an archipelago "consistently isolated [and] alone in the stream of society. (Biography Resource Center)>
This statement does much to explain the two novels and one long short story that I am familiar with- “A Farewell to Arms,” “For Whom the Bells Tolls,” and “The Razor’s Edge.” In each of these writings the characters did indeed “struggle against an alien and chaotic universe.” Hemingway him self also individually lived this struggle.
I can understand Mountain Rose’s conclusion regarding it as “a very pessimistic philosophy.” It is certainly is that, but it fits quite well with the model of the universe now being put together by modern physics.
And:
His characters exist in the "island condition," Stephen L. Tanner has noted. He compared them to islands of an archipelago "consistently isolated [and] alone in the stream of society. (Biography Resource Center)
This statement would certainly explain the title of the posthumous novel, “Islands in the Stream” I have not read this book but I might guess the Islands are the characters who pursue their struggle in an alien chaotic society?
MountainRose
September 18, 2004 - 06:30 pm
. . I ran across a while back which said: "No man is an island, but some of us are pretty long peninsulas."
And that pretty much sums it up for me. I don't feel like an island at all, but I do love being a peninsula.
Harold Arnold
September 18, 2004 - 07:30 pm
“No man is an island, entire of itself;
every man is a piece of the continent,
a part of the main; if a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were,
as well as if a manor of thy friends or of thine own were;
any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;
it tolls for thee.”
This is the John Donne poem that Hemingway drew from for the title of the great novel "For Whom the Bells Tolls." Yet the philosophy expressed here, the authors outlook of life does not seem Hemingway’s; or does it?
Click the following link for a longer writing by John Donne on his reflections on hearing the tolling of a distant funeral bell ring for an unknown person. This is a longer short sermon or meditation by Donne on the theme.
http://www.incompetech.com/authors/donne/bell.html
kidsal
September 19, 2004 - 01:25 am
My computer is now home from the hospital so can catch up on postings. Think that Hemingway didn't include much about his wife - or his son for that matter -- because most of this book was written years after he left Paris and by then he was divorced from her.
Harold Arnold
September 19, 2004 - 07:24 am
Ok Kidsal , its nice to have you back, Do come on in any time!
Scrawler
September 19, 2004 - 06:13 pm
John "Jack" Hadley Nicanor Hemingway was a noted outdoorsman who was the son of noted writer Ernest Hemingway and the father of model Margaux Hemingway and actress Mariel Hemingway. "I have been quoted as saying I spent the first fifty years of my life being the son of a famous father and am now spending the last fifty as the father of famous children."
"When he [Ernest Hemingway] was with you, you were the total center of his attention." Unfortunately after his parents divorced in the late 1920s, Hemingway saw his father only during summer vacations.
After, Ernest Hemingway killed himself in 1961, son Jack devoted himself to the preservation of his father's achievements as as a writer and outdoorsman. He even helped the Ernest Hemingway Collection, which was described in "Home Accents Today" as "lines of furniture and accessories modeled after pieces in [Ernest] Hemingway's home."
Jack Hemingway's own writings include "Misadventures of a Fly Fisherman: My Life with and without Papa," a memoir that includes accounts of both his wartime experiences and his activities as an outdoorsman.
Jack Hemingway died in 2000 from complications following heart surgery. A cousin, John E. Sanford, remembered him as "full of joy, adventure and love of life." The London Times recalled him as "the embodiment of what his father...wanted his literary heroes to be," and deemed Hemingway "a true countryman and a fly fisherman par excellence."
Can you imagine trying to be: "the embodiment of what his father...wanted his literary heroes to be?" If his cousin is right and he was "remembered as full of joy, adventure and love of life" it makes you want to take a second look at some of Ernest Hemingway's characters. Were they really "islands" as suggested from an earlier post? Or did they enjoy adventure and love life?
MountainRose
September 20, 2004 - 02:35 pm
. . . I returned it to the library the other day, which means that now I have to fly by the seat of my pants in this discussion.
Scrawler, actually I think most humans are a combination of loving adventure and life and sometimes feeling like islands; with some people feeling more like islands at times than others. And those can be the "dangerous" times where, unless they do something active, they can spiral into a depression. One can often do something active if one is healthy, but the more ill health there is the more a person can also feel restricted and ever more like an island. Physical pain turns most people inward into themselves. I wonder if that is what happened to Hemmingway in the end.
Harold Arnold
September 20, 2004 - 04:19 pm
I think Jack Hemingway was the most successful in his own right of Hemingway’s. His Mother was Hadley and we see him in the book as a baby with Hemingway himself preparing his bottle and formula. What was he called, Mr Bambles or something like that? I can’t fine it now. This book surely needs and index.
His two daughters seemed successful in their careers though the one of course another unfortunate victim of the family curse ended her life by suicide also. Also Mat Hemingway who won the silver medal in high jump at Athens last month was apparently Jack Hemingway’s grandson.
Scrawler asks, “Were they really "islands" as suggested from an earlier post? Or did they enjoy adventure and love life?” I suppose we must each answer this question for our selves based on our own individual interpretations and feelings. I my self find a definitive answer difficult to come by.
Harold Arnold
September 20, 2004 - 04:53 pm
I suggest we now move on the concluding chapters. Let us first discuss Chapters 13 – 18 for now and after a few days we will move on to the last two chapters and our individual conclusions.
Some of the happenings of the new chapters include Hemingway’s account of the cooling of the Stein/Hemingway friendship and our introductions to several interesting new interesting expatriate characters. These include several, virtually unknown to us today such as Ernest Walsh, Evan Shipman, and Ralph Cheever Dunning. All three of these were poets introduced th Hemingway through Ezra Pound. Walsh seems also to have had some connection (assistant editor) to Dial Magazine. Finally in chapter 17 we meet the still highly regarded F. Scott Fitzgerald.
The board is now open for comment on these chapters and the new characters. I will edit the heading questions and perhaps some of you will post web resource links particularly to the less well knows, Walsh, Shipman and Dunning.
Scrawler
September 20, 2004 - 06:50 pm
"The short story form as we know it today has roots developed from Greek mythology, Aesop's fables, Chauceian contemporary tales, French contes, Italian novella, and German Novellen. Then came the sketches of Washington Irving, the tales of Harthorne, Poe, Melville, Mark Twain, de Maupassant, Chekhov, and Henry James. In our time we have had Ernest Hemingway, Sherwood Anderson, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Katherine Anne Porter, William Faulkner, John Updike, John Cheever, Flannery O'Connor, Bernard Malamud, Eudora Welty - and there are all those talented new writers whose work vivifies and examines the realities of today." ("On Writing the Short Story" Hallie Burnett)
Scott Fitzergerald's "The Diamond As Big As the Ritz," Hemingway's "The Snows of Killimanjaro," Tolstoi's "The Death of Ivan Ilyich," and Thomas Man's "Death in Venice" each must have had its origin first in the author's sensitivity to his own reactions and feelings, then in the capacity of his imagination to take off into conjecture, recognition, and finally transformation, through skill and logic and individual genius, to develope these into enduring works of art." ("On Writing the Short Story" Hallie Burnett)
Harold Arnold
September 21, 2004 - 07:58 am
In the Post WW II period there were still many weekly and monthly magazines publishing short stories. Some of the popular ones were “Saturday Evening Post” and “Liberty.” I know there were more, but those are the only two that came to mind.
The book mentions a 1920’s avant garde magazine called the “Dial.” I don’t think this magazine was still around in the 60’s but somewhere I have seen copies, probable used in the Half-Price Book stores. The 1950’s had its own avant garde magazines publishing experimental stories by new developing writers. The two I remember most are the
Paris Review and the Evergreen Review. The former, I see is still around. It must have had a big endowment from its early benefactor the Aga Kahn. The latter magazine was published by the Grove Press. They first published Alan Ginsberg’s, “Howl” and the Lawrence novel "Lady Chatterly's Lover" after a decision of the US Supreme Court rule against the various would be censors determined to block the publication. It was magazines like these avant garde as well as the popular magazine that provided the on-job training that allowed great writers like Hemingway and Fitzgerald to develop. Today I think most new fiction seem to spring from the ranks of journalism or academia; new authors enter the field with out the long apprentice training that characterized the past.
Malryn (Mal)
September 21, 2004 - 08:27 am
The Dial Magazine was first started by Transcendentalists in Massachusetts. Margaret Fuller was its first editor in 1840. Ralph Waldo Emerson also was an editor at one time.
A Brief History of the Dial Magazine
Scrawler
September 21, 2004 - 04:09 pm
" In 1921, when Hemingway and his family moved to the Left Bank of Paris (then the literature, art, and music capital of the world), he became associciated with other American expatriates, including F. Scott Fitzgerald, Archibald MacLeish, E.E. Cummings and John Dos Passos. These expatriates and the whole generation which came of age in the period between the two world wars came to be known as the "lost generation." For Hemingway the term had more universal meaning. In AMF he wrote that being lost is part of the human-condition--that all generations are lost generations." (Biography Rsource Center)
Is it true that all generations are lost generations?
"[Fitzgerald] had told me at the Closerie des Lilas how he wrote what he thought were good stories, and which really wre good stories for the "Post," and then changed them for submission, knowin exactly how he must take the twists that made them into salable magazine stories. I had been shocked at this and I said I thought it was whoring. He said it was whoring but that he had to do it as he made his money from the magazines to have money ahead to write any way except the very best he could write without destroying his talent." (AMF, pp. 155-56)
"Scott Fitzgerald invited us to have lunch with his wife Zelda and his daughter at the furnished flat they had rented at 14 rue Tilsitt. I cannot remember much about the flat except that it was gloomy and airless and that there was nothing in it that seemed to belong to them except Scott's first books bound in light blue leather with the titles in gold." (AMF, p. 179)
"[Fitzgerald] was always trying to work. Each day he would try and fail. He laid the failure to Paris, the town best organized for a writer to write in that there is..." (AMF, pp. 69-70)
"[F. Scott Fitzgerld's] talent was as natural as the pattern that was made by the dust on a butterfly's wings. At one time he undersood it no more than the butterfly did and he did not know when it was brushed or marred. Later he became conscious of his damaged wings and of their construction and learned to think and could not fly any more beacause the love of flight was gone and he could only remember when it had been effortless." (AMF, p.147)
"Work would help him; noncommercial, honest work - a paragraph at a time. But he [Fitzgerald] judged a paragraph by how much money it made him and ditched his juice into that channel because he got instant satisfaction. While if you don't make so much and somebody said it was no good he would be afraid." (Selected Letters, To Maxwell Perkins, 1936, p.438)
I think Hemingway was a bit hard on Fitzgerald. After all Fitzgerald was supporting his wife Zelda. It could not have been easy living with Zelda especially when she went insane.
MountainRose
September 21, 2004 - 07:12 pm
. . . I surmised that it wasn't easy to live with Zelda even before she went insane. He must have loved her to hang in there so long.
Here is a photo of the Fitzgerald family and a brief summary of all his writings, including his short stories:
http://partners.nytimes.com/books/00/12/24/specials/fitzgerald.html I read "The Great Gatsby" and have to admit that I cared very little for any of the characters or their spoiled lives. I guess I just like to read about people I can look up to instead of reading about people who are constantly unhappy for all the wrong reasons, and that includes F. Scott and Zelda, who lived the extravagant lifestyle of celebrities. I still don't give a hoot for celebrities of any sort, but I do believe F. Scott was a fine writer. It's his subjects I don't like.
Harold Arnold
September 21, 2004 - 08:29 pm
Click Here for a short F. Scott Fitzgerald biographical sketch.
While I was aware of Fritzgerald as a 20th century American writer, had not read any of his writings and was unfamiliar with his character and life. From the Hemingway account in our book and the several Web bios that I have browsed I don’t think I would have liked him in any way. He had at least two serious defects. He was an alcoholic who could not hold his liquor making an ass of himself. He was also a hypochondriac. I would not have expected Hemingway would have accepted him as a friend as he seems to have done. I think I might have liked Hemingway but Fitzgerald, never!
I did not realize he lived until 1940, I always thought, he had died earlier.
kidsal
September 22, 2004 - 05:03 am
Did I miss the answer to the question about which were the three best restaurants?? Lilas and ???
Malryn (Mal)
September 22, 2004 - 06:21 am
Scott Fitzgerald wrote about what he knew, and what he knew were well-to-do people at the time of the Jazz Age. Sure, he was an alcoholic, but he was a meticulous, careful writer, and the people and time he portrays so well in his writing are accurate. He takes an ironic look at both the old rich and the nouveaux riches, and spares neither.
I was not born rich or nouveau riche, but I moved in that circle while I was a scholarship student in an expensive, exclusive New England women's college, and knew and know men who graduated from preparatory schools like Regis, Groton, Andover, Exeter, Hotchkiss, etc., who went on to Princeton, Yale, Harvard, Brown and other Ivy League colleges and universities. I married the graduate of one of those universities and had a close look at what went on socially in them before I did. I know the families of these people, too, the rich and the nouveaux riches.
Fitzgerald does not exaggerate. In his books he gives a true picture of a statrum of American society that existed then, some of which exists now.
Ernest Hemingway was the son of a doctor. In his youth and later, he knew this type of people, too. He rejected the softer, easier life of the privileged and chose a life of adventure, but there were things in common between these two men, not the least of which was drinking every day and nearly all the time.
To me, Zelda Fitzgerald does not show true symptoms of schizophrenia as I know them from being the mother of a schizophrenic son. What she does show is the effects of severe alcoholism. I wonder if any of her doctors seriously considered that as a strong cause for her behavior and breakdowns?
Have you looked at her paintings? I was surprised at how good they are.
Paintings by Zelda Fitzgerald
MountainRose
September 22, 2004 - 09:29 am
. . . about them. She also questions the diagnosis of schizophrenia:
http://partners.nytimes.com/books/00/12/24/specials/fitzgerald-lanahan.html There is also a hint that F. Scott suppressed Zelda's talents in writing and used some of her words as his own. And according to this she painted late in life.
MountainRose
September 22, 2004 - 10:05 am
said, "Would you put up with F. Scott Fitzgerald as a friend?"
Yes, I think I would and could AS LONG AS his decisions did not spill over onto my own life and cause chaos in my own life. With friends who have a different lifstyle than my own I also limit the relationship to only certain activities. I might enjoy a party with someone like Zelda, but wouldn't ask her for advice on finances, and I wouldn't join her in the drinking. but that dip in the fountain she took sounds like fun to me.
I have one friend who makes some incredibly stupid decisions for her life, is a terrible judge of whom to trust, is always late for everything, leads a totally chaotic life; but when we see each other we have a wonderful time together, and since I already know she will be late I simply make allowances for it and give her a certain amount of time. If she doesn't show up within that allotted time, I feel no guilt in walking away and doing something else. I don't have to take her home with me at night the way I have to do with a family member. Her life is still hers and my life is still mine.
I have a very wide tolerance for friends, don't mind rescuing them or consoling them, as long as they don't mess with my own life and as long as I feel I am free to say "NO" if I really can't come to their rescue or have other priorities. I don't believe in too much intertwinement. I figure everyone is an adult and can drink and carouse and mess up their finances as much as they like, but after they've messed up I will also feel free not to loan them any money, and if that makes them angry, I don't consider that my problem. I don't appreciate being forced into the same patterns by any sort of pressure, and I may not admire the negative parts of their lives, but may admire the other parts, like Scott's writing talent, or their talent for fun.
So I have friends who have been married 5 or 6 times, cheat on their spouses or on their taxes, play around with drugs, drink quite heavily, are hypochondriacs, etc. but I may admire their talents, or their social skills, or enjoy going to certain events with them. One of my friends is an artist who has been married 6 times, has a string of women always at his beck and call, but at a gallery opening he is the most charming, social, wonderful host you could possibly find. It's no skin off my nose if a friend has a harem in his bedroom while we are playing poker, as long as he doesn't expect me to join the harem and sticks with poker. If repeated pressure is put on me to do anything I don't want to do, the friendship is over.
I do believe in adults having the freedom to make their own decisions, and that includes me. And I also believe that whatever consequences those decisions have, we all have to make our own payments and not expect others to pay for us.
On the other hand, I'm not sure I would put up with Stein. She just rubs me the wrong way, even if she never drank or did anything stupid and was knowledgeable about the arts.
Scrawler
September 22, 2004 - 07:48 pm
" In a 1944 essay, "Thoughts on Being Bibliographed," Edmund Wilson wrote that Fitzgerald told him soon after college, "I want to be one of the greatest writers who have ever lived, don't you?" During Fitzgerald's lifetime he was regarded mainly as a portrayer of the 1920s Jazz Age and of flaming youth, but not as one of this country's most important writers. And while close to fifty thousand copies of his first novel, "This Side of Paradise," were printed in 1920 and 1921, he was never a best-selling novelist. Fewer than twenty-nine thousand copies of "The Great Gatsby" and some fifteen thousand copies of "Tender Is the Night" were published in the United States during Fitzgerald's lifetime. By the time of his death in 1940, very few copies of his books were being sold, and he was earning his living as a free-lance film writer. Since then, however, Fitzgerald's popularity has incresed dramatically.
Of post-World War I youth, Fitzgerald wrote at the conclusion of "This Side of Paradise: "Here was a new generation, shouting the old cries, learning the old creeds, through a revery of long days and nights; destined finally to go out into that dirty gray turmoil to follow love and pride; a new generation dedicated more than the last to the fear of poverty and the worship of success; grown up to find all Gods dead, all wars fought, all faiths in man shaken." Amory Blaine feels sorry for his generation but not for himself. Ready to encounter the world, but hoping not to repeat the mistakes of the past, he cries out: "I know myself...but that is all."
I can see where the youth of the 1920s related to Fitzerald's writings at the time. They too had for the most part returned from the war that would end all wars (?). I can also see that in the 1930s how those living during the depression years might loose interest in his writings. It wasn't until after his death that once again a generation became interested in his writings because they too had just returned from a world war.
"The Great Gatsby proves that Scott Fitzgerald is going to be a writer, and not just a man of one book. Writer T.S. Eliot, in a letter to Fitzgerald called the novel "the first step that American fiction has taken since Henry James."
And like Henry James, Fitzgerald fell out of favorite with the general public. It was not until they were both dead that they were once again re-discovered.
In April 1934, Scribner published Fitzgerald's forth novel, "Tender Is the Night," the story of the deterioration of psychiatrist Richard Diver, who falls in love with and marries his patient Nicole Warren. Hemingway in 1935, made the statement: "A strange thing is that in retrospect his "Tender of the Night" gets better and better."
During the mid-1930s Fitgerald published little. He was drinking heavily at times, and his health continued to deteriorate. Furthermore, his debts increased. He was unable to sell "Tender Is the Night" to Hollywood, and his short stories were no longer commanding the large fees of the past. Among those that were published during this period were a series of stories for Red Book magazine in 1934 and 1935 about a medieval hero modeled after Ernest Hemingway.
Shortly after his arrival in Hollywood in July 1937, Fitzgerald met film columinst Sheliah Graham and soon began a relationship with her that was to last, though somewhat stormily at times because of his drinking, until the novelist's death.
During this final Hollywood period Fitzgerald worked on some fourteen films, including two weeks on "Gone With the Wind." However, his only credit, shared with Edward E. Paramore, Jr., was MGM's "Three Comrades."
Fitzerald's last royalty statement in August 1940, reported that his publishers had sold only forty copies of all of his books for a total royalty of $13.13."
Harold Arnold
September 22, 2004 - 08:19 pm
Kidsal, I don’t think the question on the three principal Cafes was answered. It came up out of Chapter 11 on page 99 ”With Pascin at the Dôme:”
I went on up the street looking in the windows and happy with the spring evening and the people coming past. In the three principal cafés I saw people that I knew by sight and others that I knew to speak to.
He does not list three by names but goes on to mention the Nègre de Toulouse on page 101. Later on on the same page he continues:
I passed the collection of inmates at the Rotonde and scorning vice and the collective instinct crossed the boulevard to the Dôme. The Dôme was crowded too, but there were people there who had worked.
Are the Rotonde and the Dôme cafés? Are these numbers 2 and 3? Hemingway then met Pascin an his two models with out further comment on the cafés. But one of the models mentioned a 4th café, the Chez Viking.
Mal I notice that “The Great Gatsby and two other Fitzgerald novels were published before the end of 1925. These seem to be his major works. In your opinion is “The Great Gatsby” enough for us to award Fitzgerald the laurels for the greatest American Novel of the 1st quarter of the 20th century?
I might be inclined to give that award for the 2nd quarter to Hemingway for "The Sun Also Rises",1926; Rises", "A Farewell to Arms", 1929; "To Have Not", 1937; and particularly "For Whome the Bells Tolls", 1940. Hemingway continued to write during the 50’s, but by then a new crop of writers were taking the spotlight, although “Old Man and the Sea,” in 1952 has been mentioned by some as Hemingway’s greatest works.
Of course as between the two, Fitzgerald and Hemingway for the first half of the 20th century, I would unhesitatingly pick Hemingway as the best.
Harold Arnold
September 22, 2004 - 08:27 pm
Mal thank you for the link to Zeldas art paintings. I wonder if she did these during her long years in the hospitals in the 1930’s and 40’s.
Mountain Rose you have greater patience than I in putting up with the likes of Fitzgerald as a friend. He was such a continual whiner; he was such a hypochondriac. But I do sometimes wonder If Hemingway did not paint him in a most unfavorable light more as a character in his story than as the way he actually was in life?
Scrawler, there have been several movie versions of “Tender Is the Night.” The one I vaguely remember was a 1960’s version.
Click Here.
Malryn (Mal)
September 22, 2004 - 09:34 pm
HAROLD, there is no possible way I can compare two such very different writers, and I'm not equipped to say anybody ever wrote "the Great American Novel." It's obvious that you don't like Fitzgerald much, but have you read his works with an eye out to see what he reveals about his time and the society in which he moved?
Where did you find out that he was a whiner and a hypochondriac, by the way? I've not heard that about Fitzgerald before.
I don't know when Zelda Fitzgerald painted the pictures I posted. The one for the book jacket for one of her husband's books must have been done before the book was published.
Mal
Harold Arnold
September 23, 2004 - 09:31 am
Mal, my critical opinion of Fitzgerald was formulated from my reading of the Hemingway account of Fitzgerald in our book. Though Hemingway does not use either word, the whiner and hypochondriac bit is my conclusion from the account of the Lyons trip with additional support from Hemingway comments scattered through other chapters of the book. Quite likely these character flaws were the result of his bodies reaction to alcohol. In contrast to Hemingway, it appears that Fitzgerald simply could not hold his liquor.
As I have said before though I have read at least three of Hemingway’s novels and all of his short stories included in the 1950’s Modern Library edition of the “First 49 Short Stories, I have never read any of Fitzgerald’s works. I have been aware of “The Great Gatsby” and even remember seeing previews of the movie. I have a vague recollection of watching the 1960’s film version of “Tender Is the Night,” but I was not aware Fitzgerald was the creating author until I read AMF just last month. Also in marked contrast to the Hemingway films “A Farewell to Arms,” “For Whom the Bells Tolls, and “Snows of Kilimanjero,” I retain only a vague recollection of it in my mind today.
I have learned much about Fitzgerald’s writings and his writing style and his contribution to American Literature from your post 177 and similar contributions by Mountain Rose and Scrawler.
Scrawler
September 23, 2004 - 11:55 am
The following are letters written to F. Scott Fitzgerald from Ernest Hemingway:
"The good parts of a book may be only something a writer is lucky enough to overhear or it may be the wreck of his whole damn life - and one is as good as the other." (Selected Letters, 1929, p.305)
"Foreget your personal tragedy. We are all bitched from the start and you especially have to be hurt like hell before you can write seriously. But when you get the damned hurt use it - don't cheat with it. Be as faithful to it as a scientist - but don't think anything is of any importance because it happens to you or anyone belonging to you." (Selected Letters, 1934, p. 408)
"Like me to write you a little essay on The Importance of Subject? Well the reason you are so sore you missed the war is because war is the best subject of all. It groups the maximum of material and speeds up the action and brings out all sorts of stuff that normally you have to wait a lifetime to get. What made "3 Soldiers" a swell book was the war. What made "Streets of Night" a lousy book was Boston...One was as well written as the other, I can hear you telling me I'm all wrong. Maybe I am. Love is also a good subject as you might be said to have discovered. Other major subjects are the money from which we get riches and poores. Also avarice. Gentlemen the boy lecturer is tired. A dull subject I should say would be impotence. Murder is a good one so get a swell murder into your next book and sit back." (Selected Letters, 1925, pp.176-177)
Look how it is at the start - all juice and kick to the writer and can't convey anything to the reader - you use up the juice and kick goes but you learn how to do it and the stuff when you are no longer young is better than the young stuff." (Selected Letters, 1929, p.306)
"Second place, a long time ago you stopped listening except to the answers to your own questions. You had good stuff in too that it didn't need. That's what dries a writer up (we all dry up. There's no insult to you in person) not listening. That is where it all comes from Seeing, listening. You see well enough. But you stop listening." (Selected Letters, 1934, p. 407)
"I like to have Gertrude [Stein] bawl me out because it keeps one ['s] opinion of oneself down - way down - She liked the book very much she said - But what I wanted to hear about was what she didn't like and why - She thinks the parts that fail are where I remember visually rather than make up..." (Selected letters, 1929, p.310)
"You just have to go on when it is worst and most helpless - there is only one thing to do with a novel and that is go straight on through to the end of the damn thing." (Slected letters, 1929, p.306)
"However am now going to write a swell novel - will not talk about it on acct. the greater ease of talking about it than writing it and consequent danger of doing same." (Selected Letters, 1927, p.261)
"That terrible mood of depression of whether it's any good or not is what is know as the Artist's Reward...Summer's discuraging time to work - You don't feel death cominging on the way it does in fall when the boys really put pen to paper. Everybody loses all the bloom - we're not peaches - that doesn't mean you get rotten - a gun is better worn and with bloom off - So is a saddle - People too by God. You lose everything that is fresh and everything that is easy and it always seems as though you could never write - But you have more metier and you know more and when you get flashes of the old juice you get more results with them." (Selected Letters, 1929, p.306)
There's some exclent advice in these letters "on writing". I'm not sure I would have used the same language as Hemingway - but than again Hemingway was who he was. From what I can see Fitzgerald took what was in these letters to heart, because I can see it in his stories. I can't help but wonder whether Fitzgerald idolized Hemingway in some way. I especially like the advice Hemingway gave: "...Summer's discouraging time to work - You don't feel death coming on the way it does in the fall when the boys really put pen to paper. Everybody loses all the bloom - we're not peaches - that doesn't mean you get rotten..."
Personally, I find fall easier to write than at any time of the year. Summer is usually too hot and winter is always to cold, but fall and spring are just right for "scribling."
Malryn (Mal)
September 23, 2004 - 02:21 pm
Ernest Hemingway wrote A Moveable Feast in 1957, three years before he killed himself. He married Hadley in September 1921 and sailed for Europe in December of that year. In other words, he's written a book about things that had happened 36 years before. How good was his memory, I wonder?
For whatever reason, Hemingway destroys Scott Fitzgerald in this book. I rather imagine it was because Fitzgerald didn't live up to Hemingway's idea of what a macho man should be.
Here's a man drinking two quarts of whiskey a day in order to cope with his life, when he wrote a book about his life in Paris in the 20's, who is writing about how another writer couldn't hold his liquor. There's no one who was around at the time he knew Fitzgerald who can tell us how many times Hemingway passed out, or how many fights he got into when he had enough alcohol in him that he lost that quick temper of his, or how many times he acted irrationally. I call it the pot calling the kettle black.
I've read Hemingway, and I've read Fitzgerald. I am currently re-reading This Side of Paradise, which is a mostly autobiographical, sensitively written, really remarkable book about youth in the early 20th century, especially when one considers that Fitzgerald wrote it when he was only 22 years old.
Hemingway thinks Fitzgerald prostituted himself by writing short stories which he knew would sell. Hemingway, who was subsidized by his wife Hadley in the 20's, never once seems to consider that Fitzgerald had to do this so he and his wife, Zelda, and his daughter could eat.
I may be wrong, but I'm taking what Hemingway says about other people in this book with a very large grain of salt. When one writer who is a drunk complains 36 years later about the behavior and character of another writer who was also a drunk, there has to be something wrong with both of them.
This Side of Paradise by F. Scott Fitzgerald
Harold Arnold
September 23, 2004 - 07:51 pm
Mal- In message #182 I wrote:
But I do sometimes wonder If Hemingway did not paint him (Fitzgerald) in a most unfavorable light more as a character in his story than as the way he actually was in life?
Your scenario in #186 fits what I was driving at. You provide a motative for Hemingway's uncomplimentary description of Fitzgerald, the fact that “Fitzgerald did not live up to Hemingway’s idea of what a macho man should be." That is a logical and possible explanation.
Why did Hemingway hold his 1957 manuscript from publication during his lifetime? Most of the significant principals had died, including Scott and Zelda. Perhaps he just did not want to explain these questions to the critics who he knew would hound him for explanation.
In the 1920’s strong alcohol was still the crutch of a large majority of western society. After all as a character in one of Shaw’s plays explained,”it enabled Parliament to do things after midnight, no sane man would do in the afternoon.” As late as WW II Winston Churchill as PM of the UK is said to have consumed a quart of scotch a day while leading the war against Hitler. Today if an American President did that, it would be grounds for impeachment. I suppose alcohol contributed to the relative short life span of both Fitzgerald and Hemingway. Churchill despite his family history of dying young and his lifetime bottle a day habit beat the odds to finish his 90th year.
kidsal
September 24, 2004 - 01:25 am
Hemingway mentions meeting Juan Gris. He was considered the 3rd Muskateer of Cubism along with Picasso and Braque. Also died young.
The makeover of the Lilas cafe wasn't to the liking of Hemingway and his fellow writers. Too formal, too American. Like taking a trip to Europe and eating at McDonalds.
kidsal
September 24, 2004 - 02:04 am
Dunc Chaplin was a baseball player - pitcher.
The Dial Magazine gave a $1000 (or $2000) award for "excellence in practice of letters." Ralph Cheever Dunning won the Levinson Prize for poetry in 1925.
Harold Arnold
September 24, 2004 - 08:56 am
Kidsal and All: I just goggled Dunc Chaplin. The first hit was this discussion (that’s interesting). Among the first 10 hits was a site entitled,
Palin’s Journal that mentions Chaplin as a Princeton Baseball star player and as being with Fitzgerald when the two met Hemingway in Le Dingo bar as described in our book. The 15th hit was a site entitled
Le Dingo Bar that also mentioned the Hemingway meeting there.
Apparently Dunc Chaplin is unknown to Google today as a baseball player. Google recognizes him only through his presence at the first Hemingway-Fitzgerald meetingl
Scrawler
September 24, 2004 - 09:55 am
Letters to F. Scott Fitzgerald from Hemingway:
"I ahven't been drinking, haven't been in a bar, haven't been at the Dingo, Dome nor Select. Haven't seen anybody. Not going to see anybody. Trying unusual experiment of a writer [:] writing. That all will probably turn out to be vanity." (Selected Letters, 1926, p. 217)
"The only story in which hadley figures is "Out of Season" which was an almost literal transcription of what happened. Your ear is always more acute when you have been upset by a row of any sort, mine I mean, and when I came in from the unproductive fishing trip I wrote that story right off on the typewriter without punctuation." (Selected Letters, 1925, p.180)
"What do you think of "Men Without Woman" as a title? I could get no title, Fritz, run through Ecclesiastic though I did. So I went around to all the book stores trying to buy a bible in order to get a title. But all they...had to sell were little carved brown wood bears. So for a time I thought of dubbing the book "The Little Carved Wood Bear" and then listening to the critics explanations...Soon I was alone and began [reading the] ...bible because there were not titles in it - although I found the source of practiclly everygood title you
ever heard. But the boys, principally Kipling, had been there before me and swiped all the good ones so I called the book "Men Without Women."...(Selected Letters, 1927, p.260)
"I think you sould learn about writing from everybody who has ever written that has anything to teach you." (Selected Letters, 1925, p. 176)
"I can't tell you how glad I am youa re getting the book done. Fashionable thing is to deprecate all work and think the only thing is to go to pot gracefully and expensively, but the poor bastards doing this - giving up their writing etc. to compete with people who can do nothing and do nothing but go to pot..."(Selected Letters, 1929, pp. 304-305)
"Write me at the/Hotel Aquintana/Pamplona/Spain/ Or don't you like to write letters. I do because it's such a swell way to keep from working and yet feel you've done something." (Selected Letters, 1925, p. 166)
I've always enjoyed F. Scott Fitzgerald's stories and novels. They speak of a period in our history that I enjoy very much - 1920s. Now I'm looking at this period from a historical sense, since I've never actually lived during these times. But from what I read the world changed rapidly with the end of World War I and these changes are reflection in Fitzgerald's books.
Harold Arnold
September 24, 2004 - 08:13 pm
We seem to have passed two of the minor league American expatriates so far without mention. These include the poet, Ernest Walsh who was the subject of the “Man who was Marked for Death” chapter. Hemingway does not tell us much specific about him save that he had a Café meal with him during which Walsh appears to have suggested Hemingway was in line to receive a Literary prize a magazine Walsh was associated with was offering. In the end Hemingway found that Joyce and possibly Pound were also told they too would be probable winners.
I found nothing specific on the web regarding Walsh’s writings save that he was editor of a magazine entitled,
This Quarter. This was about 1927 when he was still in Paris living with an American writer named Kay Boyle. Walsh was indeed a man marked for death, and he died young of tuberculosis after fathering Boyles child born after Walsh had died.
Click Hear for a review of “A Moveable Feast. This review includes a blurb on Ernest Walsh and his role in the Hemingway drama in the 20’s. Also the first paragraph notes the role of Hemingway’s wife, Mary Hemingway, as editor of the manuscript before its publication.
The second minor leaguer mentioned in this week’s section is Evan Shipman. Hemingway had dinner with him at the Lilas during which they discussed literature in particular Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky. Hemingway mentioned that Shipman “was a fine poet and knew and cared about horses, writing, and painting.” Aside from that there is not much about his career in the book though we are treated to an interesting dose of literary small talk and the news that the Lilas was being converted to an American Style Bar.
Google is also ignorant of Evan Shipman save for a link to a certain Seniorsnet Book discussion (Hit #3, The Walsh search had our discussion the first hit). Also Google found an Evan Shipman Handicap Race at the Belmont track named after a racing columnist who died in the 1950’s. This might well have been the later career of the same Evan Shipman with whom Hemingway dined and discussed literature with at the Lilas.
Harold Arnold
September 25, 2004 - 08:48 am
But from what I read the world changed rapidly with the end of World War I and these changes are reflection in Fitzgerald's books.
I see the Post WW I period as the beginning of the very rapid change transforming World culture. The process slowed during the 1930's depression years but accelerated again following WW II and has continue at a rapid pace since. The question now is, how long can it continue and of course what will be the result in the end?
Scrawler
September 25, 2004 - 11:03 am
History tends to repeat itself. What the men and women felt during the period of time between WWI and WWII are still felt today. These people were feeling the effects of war just as we do today. They were also feeling the effects of the industrial revolutions. Now we are in the midst of a technical revolution. I can't believe that I need to sit for hours in front of my computer screen. I've tried to limit myself, but than if I didn't have a computer I also wouldn't have you folks. But I sometimes wish we could take a few steps back. Technical revelations were once only the mind-set of Jules Verne or George Orwell. Now it has become common place. Because our world has speeded up beyond this human's compacity, I really feel we have lost something - sometimes it is just nice to stop and "smell the roses" even if a rose, is a rose, is a rose!
Incidently, maybe you folks would be interested in the latest mystery by P.D. James; "The Murder Room." From the dustcover: "The Dupayne, a small private museum on the edge of London's Hampstead Heath devoted to the interwar years 1919-1939, is in turmoil. The trustees - the three children of the museum founder, old Max Dupayne - are bitterly at odds over whether it should be closed. Then one of them is brutally murdered, and what seemed to me no more than a family dispute erupts into horror. For even as Commandar Adam Dalgliesh and his team invistigate the first killing, a second corpse is discovered. Clearly, someone at the Dupayne is prepared to kill, and kill again.
The is fraught with danger and complexity from the outset, not lest because of the range of possible suspects - and victims. And still more sinsiter, the murders appear to echo the notorius crimes of the past featured in one of the museum's most popular galleries, the Murder Room."
audrine
September 25, 2004 - 03:17 pm
I just read the last posts on this ever so interesting subject. Although, not a great lover of Hemingway's work. The book you mentioned is one I'd like to read. I have visited Paris several times and as I looked around at the hustle and bustle of this beautiful city, I have tried to imagine what it was like in the early days of the Twentieth Century. I'll look for the book at my local bookstore. Thanks much!
Harold Arnold
September 25, 2004 - 08:05 pm
Audrine It is nice of you to to post your interest. I too found this an interesting book to read and enjoy. It is readily available in a paperback edition. I bought my copy in stock at a local B&N at the modest cost of $12.00.
We will finish this discussion next week, but new discussions will begin in October and later months. I plan to propose the discussion of the Stephen Ambrose, “Undaunted Courage” account of the Lewis and Clark trek to the Pacific in January. You (and everyone participating here) will be most welcome to join any of these discussions.
Scrawler
September 26, 2004 - 10:48 am
"Not only has Hemingway instructed us on how to write, but also on how to enjoy "his" city - Paris. His description of Paris in the 1920s gave the city a particular kind of glamour, a special aura of attaction, that has sent many writers in search of it.
Hemingway was the ideal chronicler of the delights of post-1918 Paris. The Hemingway style gets down to what was elemenal, the literay artistry that was designed to the phyiscal and "real." He could describe colors and re-create tastes and senation in unforgettable ways.
The language, the evocation of the look and feel of Paris and the joys of wine cellar and cusine and spectacle and casual pleasing, were shaped as a way of keeping the post-Versailles world at bay.
The charms of Hemingway's Paris drew considerable allure from the youthful disappointment and blighted hopes of those young men who returned from the war to end all wars. The attractions of the City of Light represented the delights of sensory experience, with participants exempted from guilt.
Ernest Hemingway arrived in postwar Paris with the imagination and discipline to re-create his situation in language, with the result that a time and place exist for us to enjoy." ("A Guide to Hemingway's Paris")
Harold Arnold
September 26, 2004 - 08:29 pm
Click Here for an article from the Canadian Review of American Studies. The subject of this article is a magazine Ezra Pound Published in 1927 –1928. Its name was “the Exile.” During its short four issue existence it published poems be severao of the Paris expatriates including Ralph Cheever Dunning, Ernest Walsh and Hemingway himself.
Ralph Cheever Dunning is another of Pound’s kinky poet friends mentioned by Hemingway in the book. Dunning like Walsh and Shipman is not much know by Google. I did locate the Canadian magazine mentioned above with a search on his name but this was more on Pound than Dunning. Also
Click Here for an article in Spanish that discusses Dunning, his opium smoking habit and his association with Pound and Hemingway. My Spanish may have failed me in several key places in reading this article, but from what I understood it does not appear to add to the information from the book.
Malryn (Mal)
September 27, 2004 - 08:24 am
Scamper
September 27, 2004 - 09:23 am
I've read several books about the Paris 20's era, and they pretty much confirm Hemingway's view of Fitzgerald as being quite the complainer and drunkard. In particular, Everybody Was So Young and Stein's Autobiography of Alice B. Tokias confirm this. HOWEVER, in my viewpoint, they were all pretty much a mess except for their writing. After reading these books, I didn't feel that A Moveable Feast particularly trashed Fitzgerald and the Murphys (subject of Everybody...), though the Murphys in particular certainly did. Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises describes a group of disfunctional friends that I suspect is very much like this group of American ex-patriots. Personnally, I don't particularly like any of them, but surprisingly I am growing to like Hemingway the best of the bunch.
Pamela
MountainRose
September 27, 2004 - 09:56 am
And that is, before WWI there was no need for either a visa or a passport to come to the U.S.A. Someone just simply paid the fare, got on a boat, and came to America. I wonder if the reverse was also true, that Americans could travel to Europe without paperwork. It certainly would have made travel less of a red tape deal.
Malryn (Mal)
September 27, 2004 - 12:30 pm
"Long after midnight the towers and spires of Princeton were visible, with here and there a late-burning light—and suddenly out of the clear darkness the sound of bells. As an endless dream it went on; the spirit of the past brooding over a new generation, the chosen youth from the muddled, unchastened world, still fed romantically on the mistakes and half-forgotten dreams of dead statesmen and poets. Here was a new generation, shouting the old cries, learning the old creeds, through a revery of long days and nights; destined finally to go out into that dirty gray turmoil to follow love and pride; a new generation dedicated more than the last to the fear of poverty and the worship of success; grown up to find all Gods dead, all wars fought, all faiths in man shaken...."
~ F. Scott Fitzgerald. This Side of Paradise
When someone can write like this, I don't care if he's a hypochondriac, a whiner, or a fall-down drunk.
( Fitzgerald was 22 years old when he wrote the above. )
Mal
ytskole2
September 27, 2004 - 12:31 pm
For a month I've been lurking(forgive me)and pondering the withhoding of info re:Movable Feast.At this point I'VE ONLY a speculation--Hemingway was a reporter-with creative writing aspirations. Within the company of both, he tried to emulate and learn from the creative ones. I think creative writing is a talent and cannot be learned, his frustration with this factor caused him to abuse and manipulate the talented ones and their weaknesses while creating his mancho-image of a "creative" sports reporter style writing--and AMF exposes this--Yvonne
Malryn (Mal)
September 27, 2004 - 12:34 pm
Hooray, YVONNE. You said it exactly right.
Mal
Harold Arnold
September 27, 2004 - 07:44 pm
Thank you Mal for the times article on the newly found unpublished Hemingway story. That is an interesting account of the legal ownership remaining in the estate. After all Hemingway mailed the story to his friend some 80 years ago. If he had mailed say a diamond ring under similar conditions, I don’t think there would be any doubt that ownership today would be with the recipient. Copyright it would seem,is different.
When I read in our book about the manuscripts Hadley lost, my thought turned to the idea of them suddenly turning up, or maybe a modern storywriter taking their sudden fictional resurrection as the subject of his/her story. How would he/she develop the plot, I asked myself without a suitable reply. I suppose the article outlines an answer.
Mount Rose in the “1826 Journal of John James Audubon” he tells of his 1826 trip to England and Scotland to publish his “Birds of North America.” I remember he did mention a passport but it was a most informal document. If my memory is correct the document he considered his passport was an informal letter signed by the governor of Louisiana under the seal of the state. He had other Letters of Introduction signed by prominent Americans including I believe the Secretary of War.
I will see if I can find my copy of the book tomorrow but I believe what he referred to as a passport was the Louisiana document. When he arrived in Liverpool he was interview by British Customs and he paid a small tax on the Bird pictures he was bringing in the Country. I recall no mention of his being asked for a passport or his presenting the Louisiana document for that purpose.
I really loved that book. At one time I even had two copies one of which I gave to a friend; the other should still be here somewhere.
Harold Arnold
September 27, 2004 - 08:04 pm
I am quite sure that F. Scott Fitzgerald could write very well. He may have been a drunk, a hypochondriac, a whiner, and all the other things we have read about him, and though I have not read any of his stories, I am quite prepared to accept the affirmative judgment of his contemporaries and some three or four generations of readers and critics. The example posted by Mal is confirmation enough.
Harold Arnold
September 27, 2004 - 08:14 pm
Ytskole2, thank you for checking in. You are welcome either as an active participant or as a silent auditor. We hope to see you an active participant in many future book discussions.
kidsal
September 28, 2004 - 02:42 am
While working on my genealogy I requested a copy of a passport for a relative who traveled to/from South Africa in 1900/02. Was told there was no passport for him -- he went to South Africe to work in mining. However, passports were issued at the time.
Harold Arnold
September 28, 2004 - 08:05 am
I have changed the heading for the conclusion of the discussion. The board will remain open through next Sunday, Oct 3rd. During these days any one may add further comments or questions concerning any part of the book. In particular everyone is urged to post their concluding comments concerning their judgment on the status of the book as a non-fictional memoir or a fictionalized account of actual people. In particular do you judge Hemingway as being fair to his old friends and associates in his accounting of their part in the story?
The process of archiving this discussion will begin Monday when the board will be changed to read only. I plan to make a readers guide for this discussion that will also be available in the archives.
Scrawler
September 28, 2004 - 10:37 am
"There is never any ending to Paris and the memory of each person who has lived in it differs from that of any other. We always returned to it no matter who we were or how it was changed or with what difficulties, or ease, it could be reached. Paris was always worth it and you received return for whatever you brought to it. But this is how Paris was in the early days when we were very poor and very happy." (AMF, p. 211)
"Under the charm of these rich I was as trusting as stupid as a bird dog who wants to go out with any man with a gun, or a trained pig in a circus who has finally found someone who loves and appreciates him for himself alone. That every day should be a fiesta seemed to me a marvelous discovery. I even read aloud the part of the novel that I had rewritten, which is about as low as a writer can get and much more dangerous for him as a writer than glacir skiing unroped before the full winter snowfall has set over the crevices.
When they said, "It's great, Ernest. Truly it's great. You cannot know the thing it has," I wagged my tail in pleasure and plunged into the fiesta concept of life to see if I could not bring some fine attractive stick back, instead of thinking, "If these bastards like it what is wrong with it?" That was what I would think if I had been functioning as a professional although, if I had been functioning as a professional, I would never have read it to them." (AMF, 209)
As you can see these two paragraphs contrast each other. It would seem that Hemingway had a great love of Paris and felt he was happy in the city. But as far as his attitude toward people in general was concerned, I would say that he had little use for them except where he could use them. Does this attitude make him a great writer? Was this really what he saw in the people around him? I think Hemingway fell in love with the City of Light, but not with its people.
MountainRose
September 28, 2004 - 01:26 pm
Well, I don't think any of us are ever fair to our friends---or our enemies for that matter. What we all see is just facets of people, sometimes compatible and sometimes not. No one ever sees the WHOLE person.
Hemmingway wrote about those things that were not compatible with his views at the time. That's neither good nor bad; those were just his views from his perspective. Nor does it mean that we have to have the same views of the people he wrote about. I ALWAYS prefer to look at people from my own perspective and see if there's compatibility, no matter what anyone else says about them. And even when there's no compatibility at all, it doesn't make that person negative; it just means there's no compatibility----and that's all.
From reading this book I get the feeling that Hemmingway was actually quite a selfish and immature person at that point in his life, and whether his memories were accurate is a legitimate question, since the book was written so much later than the actual events. But memories, whether accurate or not, shape our thinking and our personalities and become part of who we are.
He himself, and all the people he wrote about, were no doubt very talented artists in their fields, and as far as art is concerned, I don't think personality quirks matter very much, because it's the art in the end that is left for humanity even after the personality is gone. I watched a movie about Beethoven the other day. He was not a particularly appealing person, but his music was and is divine---and in the end that's all I really care about.
Scrawler
September 29, 2004 - 01:41 pm
"You must be prepared to work always without applause. When you are excited about something is when the first draft is done. But no one can see it until you have gone over it again and again until you have communicated the emotion, the sights and the sounds to the reader, and by the time you have completed this the words, sometimes, will not make sense to you as you read them, so many times have your re-read them. By the time the book comes out you will have started something else and it is all behind you and you do not want to hear about it.
But you do, you read it in covers and you see all the places that now you can do nothing about. All the critics who could not make their reputations by discovering you are hoping to make them by predicting hopefully your approaching impotence, failure and general drying up of natural juices. Not a one will wish you luck or hope that you will keep writing unless you have political affiliations in which ase these will rally around and speak of you and Homer, Balzac, Zola and Link Steffens.
You are just as well off without their reviews. Finally, some other place, some other time, when you can't work and feel like hell you will pick up the book and look in it and start to read and go on and in a little while say to your wire, "Why this stuff is bloody marvelous."
But if the book is good, is about something that you know, and it truly written and reading it over you see that this is so you can let the boys yip and the noise will have that pleasant sound coyotes make on a very cold night when they are out in the snow and you are in your own cabin that you have built or paid for with your work."
(An Interview with Hemingway, p. 185)
I have to agree with Hemingway that a writer doesn't work because he will get applause. He writes because its the one thing in the world that he/she wants to do and wouldn't do anything else. Only a very few writers get fame and glory and as far as I can see they're all dead!
He gives excellent advice when he tells us to "no one can see it until you have communicated the emotion, the sights and the sounds to the reader..."
I take it from this paragraph that Hemingway didn't think much of critics. I have always found that I have learned more from the mistakes that were pointed out to me than if people said, "Oh, I like your book" but don't say why they like it. Praise is very rewarding and is good for the soul, but I'd prefer to be told why you didn't like my work and why. I can't always say that I will agree with you, but I know I will learn from what you say. It's also a good to see your work through someone else's eyes.
MountainRose
September 29, 2004 - 07:32 pm
. . . about their work as you do, whether it's a writer or an artist or a poet. I think people who know little or nothing about writing or art don't know if it's good or not, so they tell you it's good in the kindest way they can---and I think they mean it too and their sincerity counts as a kind gesture.
To get real criticism though, I think one needs to ask someone who is in the same field and has a reputation for being honest. Even then it isn't easy because the critic knows that he/she might hurt feelings about something that is very emotional to the artist. They know that what you are trying to express comes from deep within your soul, and it's hard to be critical of that.
So if one really wants honest criticism one has to cultivate people who not only know about writing, but know how to express criticism in a gentle and helpful and positive way, without letting their own artistic expressions get in the way. That's hard to find, but I think a really good teacher can do that, and sometimes a good group does well at that.
I have a friend who truly believes she is a writer. She sent me one of her manuscripts once to help her edit and to get a critique. I gave her an honest critique as kindly as I could about plot and sentence structure and things that conflicted in her story, and sticking with her story instead of having the characters go off doing unrelated things, and sent her a book on writing dialogue, since it was obvious to me that she didn't know much about dialogue. I never heard from her again. So maybe I hurt her feelings without intending to. She was excited about her story, and it was a pretty decent plot, but it wasn't written very well. I didn't come right out and say that; instead I tried to give positive helpful ways for her to change it, and it must have upset her. But I've been a reader long enough to know good writing when I read it, and I know at least of some of what needs to be fixed.
That's why people say the bland kind things they say. It's the same with painting. So when it comes to people who don't know much about art I just take their comments as a compliment and chalk it up as a friendly gesture, same as if someone complimented me on my dress. And those people who do know something about art are the ones I really listen and whose commentary I consider seriously. Even then I may honestly disagree with their assessment and stick with my own way, but at least I gave their honest comments a sincere hearing.
I love the comment Hem made about the yapping coyotes. LOL
Harold Arnold
September 29, 2004 - 08:06 pm
Scrawler in message #210 quoted:
But this is how Paris was in the early days when we were very poor and very happy.
This is not the only place in the book when Hemingway complains of their poverty. It is a reoccurring theme that I don’t buy at all. Quite the contrary, if Hadley had a $3,000 a year income to which they added some income from Hemingway’ occasional sales and commissions as a war correspondent covering events such as the Greek intervention in Turkey, the couple enjoyed a far better income than most American workers and certainly better than most French working class people of that time.
This was when in the US a good income for an American working class family was $1,200 a year and in Europe it would have been substantially less. The fact is that the Hemingway’s were living substantially better than most American or French families. I don’t doubt that they were stretching their financial limits with an elevated lifestyle, and in this respect they did not have every thing they might have desired. Yet they were able to eat in good cafés, drink the best of the mid-priced wines, and travel quite frequently to Spain and the mountains of Switzerland or Germany. This to me hardly seems to warrant classing the Hemingway’s as the “very poor.”
Scrawler I too enjoyed Hemingway’s frequent lengthy lectures on the art of writing as he practiced it. Do you think college creative writing courses would read the book as text material? I tend to think that while it is interesting to us as a historical account of how he wrote his stories, it would be of little practical value to student writers; each new writer must find his/her own creative source. What worked for Hemingway is unlikely to click for others at least three generations later.
I think I can agree with Mountain Rose thinking that , “Hemingway was actually quite selfish” though I don’t think I would continue to say he was immature, unless one would judge his macho, ruggedly masculine image evidence of immaturity. I think a degree of selfishness goes along with being so gifted in any art. When in our book he wrote about Fitzgerald as a hypochondriac and a wimp, he would say he was just being honest in writing about a subject as he saw him. Of course he could have kept his mouth shut, but then the world would never have known. Honesty demanded he write the story as he saw it; let the chips fall as they may! As it was Hemingway did withhold publication during his lifetime. Apparently he did not want to say more than he had written about his associates, and by withholding publication avoided probing interviews that surely would have followed.
MountainRose
September 29, 2004 - 08:36 pm
. . . something that's been in the back of my mind also. They were NOT that poor, and certainly not poor enough to go hungry, unless they spent money in other ways, which then is a matter of where their priorities are, not a matter of poverty. I'm glad you pointed that out.
And I think you are quite right, artistic types are often selfish, and writers often get into trouble for writing about people who recognize themselves in their writing. But that's what writing is when it's about people. One can only write about what one knows, and usually character traits for a fictional character are a combination of people an author might have known with whatever needs to be added to make the plot move and the character realistic.
And I do think the way he described Fitzgerald is the way Hemmingway probably saw him. It's simply a point of view. The fact that the book was not published until after all the main characters had passed on was actually a kindness on Hem's part, I think.
Malryn (Mal)
September 30, 2004 - 05:44 am
"A Moveable Feast (1964) was the first of Ernest Hemingway's posthumous publications, edited into final form by his widow, Mary Hemingway, who claimed to have done virtually nothing to the manuscript except correcting the spelling of some Paris street names. That claim, however, has been questioned in the years since the book's publication. A Moveable Feast is a memoir of Hemingway's early days in Paris, introduced by a preface in which the author tells the reader that, if he or she wishes, 'the book may be regarded as fiction'. This disclaimer (and several similar statements that exist among the manuscripts) may have been intended to deflect criticism that Hemingway anticipated because of his acidulous portraits of friends and acquaintances from the period."
Source:
Literary Encyclopedia
Malryn (Mal)
September 30, 2004 - 06:05 am
"In the forward, Mary Hemingway has written that Hemingway began the book in the summer of 1958 and made some revisions to it in the fall of 1960 - and it concerns the years 1921 to 1926 in Paris, or about 70 years ago as time flies."
Source:
Hemingway in Montparnasse
A Moveable Feast was written from memory, and started seven years before it was published in 1964.. The note in the front of my book by Mary Hemingway says:
"Ernest started writing this book in Cuba in the autumn of 1957, worked on it in Ketchum, Idaho, in the winter of 1958-59, took it with him to Spain when we went therein April, 1959, and brought it back with him to Cuba and then to Ketchum late that fall.
"He finished the book in the spring of 1960 in Cuba, after having put it aside to write another obok, The Dangerous Summer, about the violent rivalry between Antonio Ordonex and Luis Miguel Dominguin in the bull rings of Spain in 1959. He made some revisions of this book in the fall of 1960 in Ketchum. It concernes the years 1921 to 1926 in Paris."
Harold Arnold
September 30, 2004 - 09:37 am
Mal the
Hemingway in Montparnasse link you gave in message #217 is a fine review of ”A Moveable Feast” because it faces the question of memoir vs fiction head on.
I like the way it distinguishes the sweet parts of the story line from the sour parts. The sweet parts being the wonderful descriptions of 1920’s Paris; the sour being the accounts of the more private side of his contemporary’s such as Fitzgerald during the lions trip.
On the memoir or fiction question the review observes “Hemingway's greatest strength as a writer in this century was that his fiction was history.” I certainly see this in the principal Hemingway fiction I have read. When writing the memoir he describe his real life interface with other living characters in chapter, paragraphs, and sentences whose structure is much the same as his fiction. So it is quite true “A Movable Feast” reads like fiction.
But we as readers know that each and every character were living people and the stories about each of them are as Hemingway saw them. Were Hemingway’s pictures of his contemporaries accurate? I think the answer to this question is we cannot be sure. At best we can only conclude Hemingway described these friends as he saw them in the late 1950’s almost 40 years after the events, and the pictures he gave us include many possible distortions induced by forgotten personal jealousies and conflicts. My conclusion is that I am willing to take “A Moveable Feast” as a non-fiction memoir describing Paris, Hemingway, and his expatriate associates as Hemingway saw them some 40 years later. I take the sour parts of the story “cum grano sal” in the absence of any rebuttal opportunity by the long dead characters.
Scamper
September 30, 2004 - 02:02 pm
That was an excellent link, thanks. As we are nearing completion of this book, are there any thoughts on pursuing other Hemingway novels on Senior Net? I'd be interested in his short stories, or A Farewell to Arms, or the biography A Life Without Consequences. I've enjoyed all of your comments here,
Pamela
Scrawler
September 30, 2004 - 02:57 pm
I think most of what Hemingway advices would be useful in today's world as well. He wrote in a more realistic way about subjects that were of interest to the people in various time periods. He was able to focus on subjects that he himself thought important and was able to change his subjects and his views as time went on which made him popular even in his later years. Fitzgerald had trouble changing his focus points and so lost his popularity because in the 30s people weren't interested anymore in his subjects. Henry James had the same trouble during his later years as well. He never quite understood why he lost popularity with the people.
The following is great advice that Hemingway wrote about "characters" that I think would be just as important today as it was in the 1920s when he wrote it:
"When writing a novel a writer should created living people; people not characters. A "character" is a caricature. If a writer can make people live there may be no great charcters in his book, but it is possible that this book will remain as a whole; as an entity; as a novel. If the people the writer is making talk of old masters; of music; of modern painting; or of science then they should talk of those subjects in the novel.
If they do not talk of these subjects and the writer makes them talk of them he is a faker, and if he talks about them himself to show how much he knows then he is showing off. No matter how good a phrase or a simile he may have if he puts it in where it is not absolutely necessary and irrepalceable he is spoiling his work for egotism.
Prose is archietecture, not interior decoration, and the Baroque is over. For a writer to put his own intellectual musings...into the mouths of artificially constructed characters which are more remunerative when issued as people in a novel is good economics, perhaps, but does not make literature.
People in a novel, not skillfully constructed "characters," must be projected from the writer's assimilated experience, from his knowledge, from his head, from his heart and from all there is of him. If he ever was luck as well as seriousness and gets them out entire they will have more than one dimension and they will last a long time." ("Death in the Afternoon" p. 191)
Harold Arnold
October 2, 2004 - 04:05 pm
I think this discussion has went very well with many provocative interpretations of the string of 1920’s now famous characters by many active and enthusiastic participants. The board will remain open through tomorrow, Oct 3, for any concluding comments any of you might want to make. It is scheduled for the read only archives Oct 4th. I plan to make a Reader’s Guide for this discussion that will also be in the archives.
I want to encourage all of you, and particularly the several first time members who participated or lurked here, to join in future discussion projects. In that regard I am going to let you in on a possible new non-fiction discussion coming up this November. Please stay tuned for further announcements of this new project. All of you who were involved in the Hemingway memoir will be welcome as participants.
I will take about 10 day during mid-October to visit my brother in the mountains of northern New Mexico. At his place at 9,000 feet the morning temperatures will be in the teens, colder than I will have here in South Texas in January. I will be back for the Nov 1 beginning of the new discussion as a participant or possibly co-DL, hopefully with Ella as the principal DL.
Again thanks everyone who participated!
Scrawler
October 3, 2004 - 10:15 am
Thanks for a great discussion. Although I had read several of Hemingway's book, this was one book I hadn't read before. It was wonderful discussing it with you folks. Thanks Harold for your leadership. Enjoy New Mexico.
Malryn (Mal)
October 3, 2004 - 10:18 am
Thanks for this discussion, HAROLD, and thanks to everyone who participated here.
Mal
ytskole2
October 3, 2004 - 10:42 am
Very sorry to see this discussion end! At 77yrs.I live alone and read alot--it"s easy enough to agree with myself when I'm digesting something I've read, but that sure doesn't broaden my learning--this discussion--and the sharing of information has been exciting and with Harold's leadership productive--my heartfelt thanks to all--Yvonne
MountainRose
October 4, 2004 - 09:46 am
It was a fascinating little book to read. I wonder if there is any place in this modern world the way Paris was in those days---with artists congregating from all over. I guess today it would be mostly the internet.
Scrawler
October 4, 2004 - 12:11 pm
Mountain Rose:
In the early 50s some of us would gather to listen to poetry in San Francisco. I heard poetry by William Burroughs and Jack Kerouac. We all thought that because of the Cold War that the world was going to end at any moment - so we lived only for the moment. Most of my friends and I were just kids in our late teens, but Kerouac and others like him showed us a very different world. Many of those listening were older and they had just gotten home from serving in World War II. They talked about a world far from the one we were used to living in middle class America.
Harold Arnold
October 4, 2004 - 01:36 pm
In the late 1960's and early 70's the Jackson Square area in the New Orleans French Quarter was the hangout of artists and hippies similar to the San Franscisco scene but with a Fre