Nothing Like It in the World ~ Stephen Ambrose ~ 2/01~ Nonfiction
patwest
December 30, 2000 - 06:20 am
Ginny
December 30, 2000 - 06:27 am
Hi, and Welcome here, ALL, to what we hope will be a discussion of Stephen Ambrose's new book, Nothing Like it in the World.
I know it was on a lot of holiday lists and was received as a gift, thanks to Nellie Vrolyk for that exciting heading, just the links alone would send the train buff into nirvana.
As is our custom, this discussion will wait here for a quorum of three before we can schedule its discussion. I hope we can have more than three present to help us look at this fascinating time in history, the completion of the transcontinental railroad!
Bring your friends and sign in, please!!
ginny
Joan Pearson
December 30, 2000 - 09:35 am
I would love to discuss this book! Like Stephen Ambrose, and LOVE trains!
FaithP
December 30, 2000 - 10:14 am
When I was a child all my Great grandmothers sons (five) worked on the Railroad out of What is now Sparks Nevada. I was taken to visit the "roundhouse" and the machine shops. I was taken on a sight seeing tour of the dining cars and pullman that were in the yard waiting to be ready for another trip. It was exciting with the trains on seven or more tracks and all the racket and steam and my big uncles and my little grandmother. She loved those brothers of hers. An Uncle was the fireman on a famous old train call the No.One that was small steam engine by todays standard and ran only in Nevada. MOstly up to Virginia City and back. Well I have just about spent 2 months reading off and on in this book. The last two weeks of no computer I have finished . . My opinion. it is another great Ambrose accomplishment. I will send my copy on to brothers after our discussion. I hope there is much interest. Of course Joan loves trains I knew she would as she also loves faeries and I bet if she hears a far away train whistle in the night her heart tightens and she feels the whisper of lonesomness,a need to travel into the unknown, a visceral pull toward magic and mystery. Ah Ha. So do I. Faithp
Ann Alden
December 30, 2000 - 04:25 pm
We just took a train tour across Canada and enjoyed it so much. My grandfather and his father and his brothers all worked for the railroad out of Lafayette, IN and then out of Rankin, IL. The roundhouse for the RR was in those little towns. My GG was a blacksmith for the RR and worked in the roundhouse. My gran's relatives actually worked on the trains. I think it was the NicklePlate but am not quite. I have invited my brother to join us here as he is a retired RR person and very interested in the history of the RR in America. My book is waiting for me to pick up at the library. Can't wait to read it. I saw Stephen Ambrose interviewed about the book and about the opening of the D-Day Museum. Interesting interviews, both.
The Monon RR ran behind our home in Indy and the suburban depot was right down the street. We were thrilled as children to tour the newest diesel engine that they had acquired. It was on display for us to go through for a day or two. Very exciting! We also were constantly putting pennies on the tracks to see them smashed by a train. Not the safest thing to do, but for us, exciting! Didn't take much to entertain us back then! LOL!
williewoody
December 31, 2000 - 09:43 am
Just finished reading "Nothing Like it....etc" by Stephen Ambrose. This is the first of his books that I have read. If his others are like this one I will hasten to pick one up.
By way of introdction let me tell you a little about myself.
I can't say that any of my ancestors were involved with railroads in any way, except maybe as passengers. I know my father traveled by rail quite a bit in his job as an auditor for the U.S. Department of Agriculture back in the 1930's and 40's. In fact on a couple of occasions I was able to go with him to Denver, Colorado.
I guess my first experience with rail travel was when I was 7 years old. My parents allowed me to go from Chicago to Kiel Wisconsin by myself on the Chicago Milwaukee and Pacific R.R. Had to change trains in Milwaukee with the aid of a kindly conductor. That first trip remains vivid in my memory to this day. I have always liked long distance travel on trains, and even now I prefer to take the train (Amtrak) rather than fly, if I have the time to do it. My interest in trains has gotten me involved in Railroad preservation. I have been a member of the National Railway Historical Society for over ten years. Currently I serve on the national board of directors of the organization as well as the Gulf Coast Chapter
(Houston) board. While I have not been involved with railroads as a career, having worked in the oil industry for 38 years, I did spend a couple of weeks working for the Monon Railroad while awaiting my call up for active duty in the Marines in 1944.
I took great pleasure in travel on the good old Monon during college years. Their local from Chicago to Louisville, stopped at every college town along the route. Needless to say it was great fun heading back home to Chicago for Christmas vacation in the early 1940's
I look forward to a discussion of Mr. Ambrose's book which I really enjoyed. I found it quite informative about how the transcontinental railroad was conceived and construction begun during the final days of the Civil War. Even though I have always been a student of history, and particularly the Civil War period, I was unaware of the involvement that President Lincoln had in the planning for the railroad.
Harold Arnold
December 31, 2000 - 11:11 am
I suppose that in the last quarter of the 19th century the expansion of the railroads provided many jobs for Americans particularly in the west. Later the RR’s were the source of employment to two generations of my family.
One of the services tied to the railroads was the United States Railway Mail Service. My Grandfather became an employee of this agency in the early 1890’s. The men of this service traveled their prescribed route in the mail car typically attached to passenger trains just beyond the engine and its fuel car. They sorted mail addressed to small towns along the route. For the small towns the train did not actually stop, only slowing down with the mail dropped off and picked up by hooks as the train sped by. My grandfather became the district Chief Clerk in 1921. He held the position until 1933 when he retired.
My father worked for several railroad offices from 1914 when he graduated from high school until 1936. In 1931 the SP transferred his office to Houston. As a
RR employee my father had a pass and some of my earliest recollections were taking the 11:00 PM train from Houston to San Antonio. The train arrived at San Antonio in the very early morning. Goodness that was not very fast 7-8 hours for about 200 miles. My father did not like Houston and he quit the railroad in 1936 to move back to San Antonio.
My next opportunity to ride on railroads was in 1944 when I joined the navy. In the next 8 months I had at least 3 trips from San Antonio to San Diego or San Diego to Gulfport, Mississippi, back to Los Angles and up to San Francisco. In particular I remember snow in the mountains in Arizona on one trip and an all night milk run up the coast from Los Angles to San Jose. Also I remember the SP would arrive in Yuma Arizona on the westbound run about 11:00 PM and not leave for several hours. I found a little hole in the wall restaurant near the station that served a rather substantial T-bone steak and French fries for a dollar. My last west-east rail crossing came a year later in June 1946 when the War was over and I came back to Texas for discharge. Since then my only RR travel of any significance came in 1954 when I took the train to Washington D.C. My only Amtrak experience was in 1993 from Washington to NY and back.
Looking back I enjoyed my RR travel experience, but at the time I remember being quite impatient because of the slow snail pace speed. I browsed the Ambrose book at B & N over a month ago. Also I have read the material in the B & N on line catalog and the following N. Y Times review (see link below). Stephen Ambrose is a most interesting writer. We have previously discussed his Lewis biography in 1998, and I look forward to participating in this discussion.
The following is a link to a New York Times Book review of the Ambrose book"
Nothing Like It In The World
betty gregory
January 1, 2001 - 06:16 am
Let's set a start date while the interest is growing---Feb 1st? 15? I think this particular book and discussion would be a good opportunity to invite male family and friends to join in. I've already thought of two people, a brother and a friend, who I know would like the book and might be persuaded to join the discussion. In fact, I'm going to send the book to one with the invitation. (Except for several of us book weirdos who can point to great discussions of awful books, it will probably be a great book with a great discussion that will tempt more new participants to stick around for another discussion.)
Ginny
January 1, 2001 - 08:14 am
My goodness, is THIS not the most exciting beginning we have ever had for a book here?
I'm just thrilled and will be counting on each one of you for your dazzling input here!
Joan what a thrill to see you here, you are on a major train hub there in DC, aren't you?
And you, FaithP, I loved your train reminescences!
Ann (YES! Please do beg your brother, retired RR person here, wouldn't that be a thrill for us all, we could get the insiders view, and so many things we will want to ask)!
Williewoodie?????????? National board of directors of the National Railway Historical Society ?????? WHEEEEEEEEEE? Are there any of your comrades you think might like to join us here? wow wow wow.
We want to hear more about it!
Harold, what wonderful stories of the railroad! We can see trains are not only in your family history but in your blood too! Thank you for that link!
Betty! How exciting, "I've already thought of two people, a brother and a friend, " please do have them all assemble right here.
How exciting.
While reading of your own involvements in train history I suddenly remembered my grandfather on my father's side was a Conductor! Yes and my son has his watch, it's a very old one and very strange looking, he was born in 1880.
I never met him as he died of TB which he apparently contracted while doing his job and was sent ....to Texas I think, Harold, to a sanitorium?
The RailRoad paid for his transportation of the coffin and his remains back here when he died for the funeral.
February 1 has been suggested as a target starting date for this discussion, what say you all?
If that suits, that it shall be, and we can fill the time by talking over our own memories of trains, I must tell you of what I see on Thursdays.
So much to tell, so little time. Williewoody, tell us more about that organization!
How does February 1 sound??
ginny
betty gregory
January 1, 2001 - 08:53 am
My grandfather, my mother's father, worked on the railroad here in Texas, for 20 years, I think it was, before he worked 20 years as a "postman," a mail carrier. My Mother has stories of her whole family riding the train for free from Temple down to Galveston each summer.
On eBay, few months ago, I saw an old Texas map showing (only) all the old railroad routes----the state was DENSELY covered with routes, just a fraction remaining today.
williewoody
January 1, 2001 - 09:33 am
Looks like a few more are joining the caravan.
Besides being involved with the NRHS, I am also a life member of the National Model Railroad Association. Over the past 40 plus years I have built several layouts in a basement or garage. All of which had to be torn down everytime we moved. We are now in our 5th retirement home (10th overall). I have given up rebuilding and reverted to my hobby of oil painting.
The National Railway Historical Society has about 170 chapters all over the country,two in Canada and one in England. Their primary objective is the preservation of railway equipment (Cars, engines,signals,buildngs, etc. ) The current national membership stands at around 20,000. Three years ago the National organization established a program to promote interest in Railroad presrvation for high school students. It is called Railcamp and is conducted each summer in conjuncton with the National Parks System at Steamtown USA in Scranton Pa.
Society membership information can be secured through the national office at:
National Railway Historical Society
100 North 17th St. Philadelphia, Pa.19103
or
P.O.Box 58547, Philadelphia, Pa.19102
Tel. (215) 557-6740
E-mail: nrhs@compuserve.com
Website:www.rrhistorical.com/nrhs
Many of the chapters have museums, and some sponsor rail excursions or operate tourist railroads.
If you love railroads, you will find plenty of "soul mates" among the members of NRHS. There is a National convention every year. The 2001 Convention is in St. Louis, June 18-23. There will be several excursions planned, some with steam locomotives, I am sure.
williewoody
January 1, 2001 - 01:08 pm
GINNY: Yes, Feb 1 sounds good to me. meanwhile I will try to scout up some other seniors who may be interested. I really look forward to this discussion. I feel sure that it will be very enlightening. You know most all of us who grew up in the thirties and forties, and even later have a latent admiration for the railroads, which were the major way to travel back then.
I absolutely hate air travel these days, with cancellations, delays, and being treated like a sardine when you manage to squeeze into a seat. I try to take Amtrak every opportunity I get, even though it is not always convenient. I have even gone so far as to take a short flight to a point where I could board an Amtrak train for a longer journey.
seldom958
January 1, 2001 - 01:16 pm
Today's Sacramento Bee has a front page aricle entitled "Rail buffs blow whistle on Ambrose book of errors."
Got to www.sacbee.com to read the article.
Ginny
January 1, 2001 - 03:59 pm
Seldom
958~ Welcome!!
A warm welcome to you here and thank you so much for that link, we
will get it on an html page and in the heading asap!
Please plan to join us as we discuss the book??!
Williewoody, how interesting can you GET??? I am fascinated here. I've
printed that out for my son, he must see that.
This is exciting and fun, Guys! Anybody else have a thought about the
February 1 starting date?
ginny
rambler
January 1, 2001 - 04:10 pm
I think you can count me in on "Nothing Like It In the World". I am
fond of both non-fiction and rail travel. We still have a commuter
rail line in my hometown (Park Ridge, Ill.) that used to be the
Chicago and North Western that went all the way to Minneapolis, maybe
farther. Even now we take it to downtown Chicago when our destination
is the west edge of downtown, as opposed to the shopping area near the
lake, or when weather is pleasant and we don't mind walking to the
latter. For years I took it to work in the city, even though I had to
walk a mile or more to and from.
Is the book in paperback
yet?
I've lost SN's "What If" classification. Anybody know what
major heading it may be under? (Disregard: It's IF under
Lifestyles.)
Sentimentalists may enjoy my "puppy love" post under
Arts and Entertainment, Pop Music Memory Lane. Best wishes.
rambler
January 1, 2001 - 04:42 pm
williewoody: You're much too young, but any memories among your forebears of Gene Debs and his National Railway Union, if that's what it was called? I've been to his home/museum in Terre Haute. I know he spent a year or two in federal prison in Atlanta.
Harold Arnold
January 1, 2001 - 04:45 pm
The Sacramento Bee article mentioned in message 12 can be read by clicking the following:
Rail buffs blow whistle on Ambrose book errors Without defending Ambrose or endorsing the charges of this article I offer the following comment regarding the 24-page letter sent to several publications challenging 50 passages:
The examples given cite errors on p-43, 69 and 292. But none of these are directly concern with the subject, the completion to the transcontinental RR link. One of these relates to the exact location of the California gold discovery, another concerns the identity of the designer of a RR bridge in the east, and the third concerns intelligence reports in connection with a civil war battle. None of these are essential to the subject.
Another charge is that Ambrose misidentified certain people appearing in old photographs. As one who has been working with century old family pictures, I know how hard it is to identify individuals. True when in doubt Ambrose should have said so but he may well have had sources that led to his conclusions.
Ambrose is charged with over dramatizing the story. This is the Ambrose style. He did somewhat over do it in “Undaunted Courage” so far as my taste is concern. Some may like this style, Others don’t rate it so high.
The 500 kegs a day used to blast a certain tunnel mentioned in the article sounds like the 14 pounds per day per capita of buffalo meat consumed by the L & C crew while on the Missouri. It sounds high to me and I think Ambrose should have footnoted how he arrived at that estimate. Again this is typical of the Ambrose style and relates to his tendency to over dramatize his stories.
Another point that should be emphasized is that Ambrose wrote this book for a general audience, not as a college text on American RR history. When I first heard of the Ambrose book I did a search of the B & N catalog for current titles on the subject. There are many including one or two that appear much more inclusive as an academic history. I think it true that readers seeking a RR history textbook are unlikely to choose “Nothing Like It In The World.”
We should keep this article in mind as we read and discuss the book. Perhaps we can obtain a copy of the 24-page letter. Perhaps our discussion can lead to conclusions as to whether the book’ might be subtitled, “Lies Stephen Ambrose Told Me,” or if the article is “Lies the Sacramento Bee Told Me.” I suspect the conclusion will lie somewhere in-between.
robert b. iadeluca
January 1, 2001 - 04:49 pm
In my opinion if we concentrate too much on the accuracy of how many pounds of meat or kegs of powder and find fault with items like that, we will miss completely the magnificence of the linking of the two coasts of our gigantic new nation.
Ginny
January 2, 2001 - 05:03 am
Rambler!! Welcome, welcome, no, as far as I know, it's not out in paperback yet, I think it's a pretty big seller and may not be for some time, maybe the library has more than one copy?
Good point, Robby, what an historic event that was.
Harold, thank you for that and we will attempt to get the letter as well as we will keep your own statements there and we can look more closely at the different opinions as we progress, great stuff.
I of course know absolutely nothing of the subject so it can't help but be a learning experience for me.
I need to get those two up asap!
THIS will be some KIND of discussion!
How does Feb 1 suit?
ginny
williewoody
January 2, 2001 - 05:23 am
RAMBLER and ROBBY: so good to see you both here. This should be a real interesing discussion on a subject close to my heart. Rambler, I think you already know I was a longtime resident of Chicago and at least 10 years in Wheaton. I too commuted on the Chicago & Northwestern mainline into Chicago and walked a good mile to my office on Michigan Ave. Years before that I lived in Joliet and rode the "Rock" every day. Also commuted for a short spell on the Chicago and Western Indiana. Railroads are the life blood of Chicago, which I believe is the railroad capital of the world.
Anyway, like Robby I hope this doesn't deteriorate into a knit picking exercise of how many miniscule mistakes the author made. That can be done with almost any writer. It's the big picture that is so interesting.
Ann Alden
January 2, 2001 - 07:12 am
Rambler, I looked up the book on Amazon.com and they are selling the HB for 40% off at $17 or so plus they already have a new/used copy for $14.33. Considering the cost of PB's, this is not a bad deal.
Ginny, we both know that I hate responsibility! I have sent this site to another friend who sounds like williewoody. He has such large set up in his basement that when there is a convention here in Ohio, they come to visit his trains. He has 5 boys and one girl who have helped him over the years. They all love trains.
Joan Pearson
January 2, 2001 - 01:38 pm
I think Feb.1 sounds fine...although I'm off to Florida (by plane not train) for the first week...but will have plenty of time to catch up on my reading if I haven't finished by then!
This is exciting...seeing the guys here! W.W., you would love Ambrose's Citizen Soldier (WWII) and Undaunted Courage (Louis & Clark Expedition) since you enjoyed this one!
Wouldn't it be fun to take the train to DC, Harold? We are having our annual Bookfest there in November and would love to meet you- ALL of you! How about this? If we can pull off getting Stephen Ambrose to meet with us, would you come? We will be in town for the National Press Club Authors' Night, and I have my fingers (and toes) crossed that he will be in attendance! We almost got him this past November in New Orleans, but couldn't get enough Vets together for that one. You wouldn't believe the exhiliarating (though weird) experience it is to meet people you've been chatting with on the internet! What fantastic people!
Faith, yes, I love trains - almost as well as fairies! Yes, I have memories as a seven-year old girl lying in bed at night in boarding school, listening to the train whistle, dreaming of the places it would continue to blow as the sound of the train gradually disappeared out of hearing.
That feeling of infinite possibilities has never left me when I hear a train whistle! Ginny has a wonderful painting that sums it up...a small town girl, dreaming of the places the train will visit as it passes outside a restaurant window on a winter day.
My interest in trains is purely romantic, but would love to learn more about them from Stephen Ambrose and from you all! This should be great! The romantic, the historical, the factual...
Ginny, can you find a way to show your painting to the rest of us. It is wonderful! I sense a real parallel ...the train and a good book! They both take you to places you dream about!
jbowl35
January 3, 2001 - 07:49 am
I have a vison problem and can't read printed books anymore. However, I discovered audio books and have been so grateful for them. I have listened to Stephen Ambrose's Undaunted Courage and Citizen Soldier and enjoyed them both immensely. I can hardly wait to get Nothing Like It In The World. If anyone knows where I can get the audio version, I'd appreciate the tip.
robert b. iadeluca
January 3, 2001 - 09:24 am
As a boy I had a set of Lionel trains. They were my "bestest" possession! Later on a child who had "grown up" gave me his set of trains of another brand. With two sets I was in my glory!
Robby
LouiseJEvans
January 3, 2001 - 12:25 pm
I have never had trains, but I always love seeing the way some people set them up with little villages and mountains. A couple of years ago the Museum of Science had some trains set up for us to look at.
Ginny
January 3, 2001 - 12:37 pm
jbowl35 - !! Welcome, Welcome! to our SeniorNet Books & Lit! We are delighted to have you here, please stick around. Have you tried our own Bookstore at the top of the page? Look up to the very top of this page right under the SN logo and type in the name of the book, they should have the audio right there, let us know?
Robby!Louise! Welcome, welcome!
Oh Lionel, did you see there's a new book out on Lionel? How it got started and all? I ordered it for my oldest son, he still has, in the barn, an entire room full of model trains, including one which runs all around the entire room, but they're the N gauge and not the O.
Joan, how nice of you to remember, I'm ashamed of this because it's the best I can do with a notecard which has a very glossy finish, and which, as a consequence has ruined the texture of the waitresses uniform, among other things.
This artist's work is available at your local Barnes & Noble store as notecards? This is one of a series called Reader's Notecards but the moment I saw this, I knew it was me, and so I had to have the original which is a pastel, actually I believe it's chalk ground INTO the surface of the canvas.
It's called "Headed Over the Pass" and the artist is Deborah DeWit Marchant. It's very large and much bettr than this notecard has distorted it:
Headed Over the Pass
I do have one I wish you could see, too. My father painted a steam engine coming into a small country station and painted the name of my oldest (and subesquently another one with the youngest) son on the station sign, it's really quite good but too large to attempt to scan in. My father, the son of the Conductor, took up painting late in life and was actually quite accomplished and trains seemed to be of interest to him, small wonder.
I bet some of you know where that huge huge famous model train layout is located, is it in New Jersey?
We had a neighbor once in New Jersey who built his own train in his own back yard, it was small but very cute and he'd ride around on it.
The local retired trainmen here maintain a small...is it a steam train in the city park and any day in the summer you can see plenty of adults as well as children going aboard.
The first real engine I went up in was in the Philadelphia Museum of....Science? They have a huge engine there and you can climb up in the engineer's seat.
Is it still true that you can't look straight out ahead if you drive a train?
Why did they do away with the cabooses? And why can't we have them back?
ginny
Ann Alden
January 3, 2001 - 01:07 pm
Ginny, I do believe that I have that card with a note inside from you. Do you have a digital camera? You could take pictures of the train art that your father painted and share it with us.
jbowl35, you can get the audio on Amazon.com for a very reasonable price. I saw it there yesterday. Also, our local library has it so maybe yours does,too. We use the library audio tapes frequently while on trips, so know how nice they are to hear.
LouiseJEvans
January 3, 2001 - 02:08 pm
Here in south Florida we have a train system called Tri-Rail. I rode in it for the first time last week. It only goes from Dade County to West Palm Beach. It isn't real fast but I guess it's supposed to keep some automobiles off of the highway. The cars have 2 stories. But what really has my jaw dropped is this: Someone is suing it because a drunk crossed the tracks in front of it and got run over. A train is a pretty large object and it definitely lets you know it's on its way. The complaint is that there was no barrier. But a barrier doesn't necessarily stop a pedestrian.
williewoody
January 3, 2001 - 04:24 pm
Just a few comments;
LOUISE: I don't know anything about the lawsuit you mention,But I don't see how any jury could find for the plaintif. People drunk or sober have a responibility to be aware of the inherent danger of oncoming trains. Far too many in autos and trucks ignore the flashing lights and gates and cause millions of dollars in damage and needless loss of life every year.
GINNY: The answer to the disappearance of the caboose is simply "the bottom line". In economy moves the ralroads cut back on train crews, basically from four man operation to three. There were two men riding the caboose (the train conductor and a brakeman). The engineer and fireman rode the Locomotive completing the basic crew. The Railroad companies combined the conductor and brakeman jobs and have just three men now in the loco cab. Most R.R. Museums have at least one caboose, so even though they are no longer out on the road, the young generation can see them yet.
I like most everyone else miss them. The end of a freight train is now gaurded by FRED which is the alphabet soup designation for what is called the "Flashing Rear End Device."
Also. I should mention that there must be literally thousands of model railroads in homes, and museums etc all over the country. Every size and gauge.November is Model Railroad month, when all over the country individuals who have home layouts, and also clubs and museums, schedule layout tours (self guided). Information about location of these layouts can usually be found at Hobby shops that sell model railroad equipment. You will be amazed of what some folks can do to recreate railroading in miniature.
patwest
January 3, 2001 - 07:01 pm
Galesburg, IL near where I live has a large roundhouse which originally was the CB&Q... Chicago, Burlington and Quincy... Then it was
Burlington Northern and BN has merged with the Santa Fe... So it is BNSF.. and the round house is still going strong.
There is a long weekend of Railroad Days in June, which attracts railroad buffs from all over... The tourist attendance is usually around 10 to 15
thousand... And we have a large model railroad display at the Sandburg Mall.. with about 500 feet of track. During Railroad Days... tours are
given out to the 'hump' where the freights are made up and the trailer trains are loaded.
They also demonstrate the newest tie and rail laying machines, and the gravel and rail leveling machines. Back 30 years all this was done with
Mexican labor and we still have a large Mexican community in Galesburg.
We also have one of the largest (Koppers) tie plants in the US. Logs are shipped in for sizing and creosoting for ties.
And we also have 2 Amtrak rail stations..
patwest
January 3, 2001 - 07:07 pm
We have our own way-car(caboose) here in Altona in the park... The Burlington donated them to any town along the main track.
The Burlington was a generous neighbor... One of our farms borders the main track where they always maintained an excellent fence,.... and we always received a generous fruit gift from them as well as a calendar visible from 50 feet.. But no more... not since they merged with the Santa Fe
FaithP
January 3, 2001 - 08:25 pm
Re: Letters to Sacramento Bee. I have live with the Sacramento Bee coming into my home since I was a child in grade school and most of my family hated that paper. We Loved the Sacramento Union which the Bee ran out of business in 1990. The people making the critizisms are right in many of the points. Living here on top of Sutters Fort and going to the site of the original gold find many times I know lots of people who are saying just what those letters say. And the critical examination of his ideas and story line regarding the men from China is still unexamined. I am going through my book now looking especially for these passages. We have a wonderful Railroad Museum her in Old Sacramento. I need to visit there again as much has changed recently. Old Sacramento has really taken off as a tourist site. Ambrose was a little loose with his facts but doggone it his book was easy to read and made the people very real to me. Faith
Ginny
January 4, 2001 - 01:09 pm
WOW, sounds like Galesburg is the place to be in June, I would love to see those track laying demonstrations, isn't it FASCINATING when you hear and see of all these things going on?
Ann, would you believe I never thought of that, I will give it a try!
Williewoody, I'm glad to hear you say three men are in that engine because it's our habit when delivering Mobile Meals to stop for lunch at a sort of diner next to the railroad tracks and many times the engineer will stop and a man will get out (they call ahead) and come over to get a take away lunch , sometimes it's two men, and it vaguely worried me that that huge thing sat there ominiously rumbling.
Of course I'm worse than any kid and told the...fireman? The last time that next time I was coming with them. hahahaaha
Now they wave every time if they can't stop. hahaahahhaa
You just WAIT till I get some grandchildren! hahahahaa
Does February 1 suit everybody, then? If so and there are no NAYS, let's do it.
Meanwhile I am really enjoying everybody's associations with the railroads of America, have any of you ridden on the new fast trains in the north East?
Wouldn't it be nice to have a slick fast service nationwide?
Why did they do away with the cowcatchers?
I did put both the Sacramento Bee article and Harold's Refutation post in the heading? If you look up in the heading under
Interesting Railroad History Links see them all listed.
Please bring here anything you have about trains so we can all enjoy!
ginny
seldom958
January 4, 2001 - 01:54 pm
Daniel Weintraub wrote another article about Ambrose's book in the Jan 2, 2001 issue
Go to sacbee.com, scroll down until it shows the last 7 days, click on tuesday then scroll to "Section; Voices."
The Bee has a nationwide reputation as an excellent newspaper and wins many awards. The Sacramento Union went out of business because it was extremely right wing. As an example, at one time Richard Scaife invested in it.
I e-mailed Weintraub and told him about this board's discussion. Maybe he's lurking???
Ginny
January 4, 2001 - 02:04 pm
Thank you for that as well, seldom and for writing Weintraub, let's see if we can get him in here, what a delight that would be.
Has anybody thought to write Stephen Ambrose, maybe they would be interested in debating same right here!
This is so fun.
ginny
betty gregory
January 4, 2001 - 08:24 pm
A wonderful thought, Ginny, about luring the principals (principles?) in for debate, but, hahahahaha (as you would say), my VERY first thought was----be careful what you wish for!!
seldom958
January 4, 2001 - 09:29 pm
Put "Scaife" in the Lycos search engine and you will see what a right wing nut-cake Scaife is.
Perhaps this message doesn't belong here but I was deeply offended by the hatred of the Bee in message #31.
I was a Bee paper boy in the 1930s and have been a proud subscriber ever since. It continues to win many jounalistic awards.
Phyll
January 5, 2001 - 07:02 am
Honest to Gosh!!! I told myself that I was going to cool it on the book discussions for awhile but when I found this up-coming discussion on "Nothing Like It In the World" I guess you have hooked me-----AGAIN! My grandfather and great-grandfather worked for the MKT in Fort Scott, KS. Both of them retired early because of injuries received--my grandfather lost most of one foot and my gr-grandfather lost a leg below the knee. It was a dangerous vocation.
My grandparent's house was on the hill just above the "Katie" yards and roundhouse and though my cousin and I were ABSOLUTELY forbidden to go down there we would sneak away and do it anyway.
I am looking forward to reading the book and to the discussion.
LouiseJEvans
January 5, 2001 - 08:51 am
Just noticed that the link in Ginny's post #32 doesn't work for webtv. I got the clue because the cursor was an ugly red instead of the usual gold.
Harold Arnold
January 5, 2001 - 10:23 am
The following is a clickable to the Tuesday Sacramento Bee Article on the Ambrose Book.
Sacramento Bee #2 (Note: These links appear to be a 7-day achieves that will expire on the 8th day after publication)
In this article the Bee stresses one of the points I made in my earlier post dated Jan 1, namely that “Nothing Like It In the World” is not an academic history text, but rather is directed to a popular audience for their general understanding and reading entertainment. This article goes deeper into some of the political maneuvers and interface between the private railroad interests and governments. The writer is critical of Ambrose for his dismissal of what today would be considered grossly unethical political and business practices as simply playing the game by the rules as they then existed. While the writer concedes that perhaps the railroads would not have been built so quickly had a more ethical standard been applied, Ambrose is nonetheless criticized for not devoting more pages to this point. While I agree that in a college history text the point would require much more exhaustive consideration, Ambrose did cover the lack of political and business ethics on the part of the principals though he did dismiss it as compatible with contemporary standards.
I think anyone familiar with post civil war economic and business history knows how different the rules were at the time. In Texas railroad construction was largely a State matter. The federal government was hardly involved at all. To induce railroads to build in Texas the state originally awarded railroads 8 sections (5,120 acres) of land for each mile of track built. Later this was raised to 16 sections for each mile. By 1900 patent survey maps of Texas West of San Antonio were often marked almost exclusively with grants to the many railroad companies that built the rail network. The railroad companies were very prosperous and not particularly responsive to serve the needs of their customers. Despite this there was almost immediately the filtering down of public profits that transformed a 3rd world subsistence economy into the beginning of a modern 20th century state. Also the fact that the state did have the foresight to retain a royalty mineral interest resulted in very significant state mineral income that has been a factor of saving the citizens from a state income tax even to this day. I will make another post possibly later today concerning the economic and social effect of the coming of the Iron horse to San Antonio in 1877.
seldom958
January 5, 2001 - 10:01 pm
I noticed Harold Arnold's message #39 included Weintraub's e-mail address.
Wow! Will Weintraub respond?
This could get interesting.
FaithP
January 5, 2001 - 10:39 pm
Well I was fairly obsteperous when I stated what I did re: my regard or lack of it for the Sacramento Bee. It is just a political opinion of mine own and I have had this opinion for about 60 years. Do not take it though to mean I never read the Bee or that I have not spent a lot of hard earned money on subscriptions. I have. Still hate the general policy and editorial stand the paper takes. And I appreciated the Sacramento Union more. Why should that offend anyone. It is my opinion not an agenda I have to drive the Bee out of Business.No way would an old widow lady have the powere to do that. Heaven Forbid Seldom958 that I should hurt your feelings in this manner. OH I do not like to be offensive but also I feel I must be true to myself. FP
betty gregory
January 6, 2001 - 05:47 pm
I thought your first post, Faith, was just giving us some perspective on the historical rivalries of the two Sacramento papers, along with a setting for letters to the Bee and publishers of the letters. It's ok with me if you dislike a paper's editorials and policies. Since I feel I know you pretty well, it just adds to the interesting politics of criticism authors receive.
A year or so ago, I had the thought that Ambrose might be his own worst enemy. He has few peers in bringing history alive for the general public. His work is SO readable, so engaging, that of course he would eventually come under closer scrutiny. And maybe should.
Another perspective, as we've discussed elsewhere, is that "history" evolves. What we think we know is often replaced by new information. I almost take as a given that a work of "history" will not be complete and will have some errors.
maggiem
January 6, 2001 - 08:07 pm
I have this book and will be "on board" (oh funny) I always knew I wanted to read it and now the excuse is here - people to read it with!
Up and away from the lost legends of new jersey! m.
FaithP
January 6, 2001 - 10:01 pm
Thanks Betty for understanding my feelings re:Local Paper (s) Betty is right about history evolving. Every time a new reasearcher goes digging in diaries, journals,letters, ledgers and bills of lading and purchase orders, when he examines accounts and credit records, he will come up with different interpertation of the written facts which also may be distorted themselves or ambigious so that the reasearcher puts his own philosophy and politics etc into the work. And his own best interests.
This book is readable, saleable and does have a view of some of these gentlemen who were involved that some Californians who worship Crocker and others of his ilk do not want an Ambrose writing about "their subjects". And because of it's popularity the book is as Betty stated bound to be scrutinized beyond a fiction novel for sure. But this is a popular narrative of how Mr. Ambrose see's the conception, building, and running the first transcontinental railroad. It is not a text book. To bad text books should be so lively with interesting facts. FaithP
Ann Alden
January 7, 2001 - 05:14 am
Ambrose is not the only good history story teller. There is also David McCulloch who has written some very readable history books. My copy of this book is in at the library and when I pick it up, I will also be getting a photographic history book that I ordered. Should be interesting also.
rambler
January 7, 2001 - 02:31 pm
I'm lurking. (Like Jack Benny, when asked to spend $26 or whatever for a book: "I'm thinking! I'm thinking!".)
Ann Alden
January 9, 2001 - 04:04 am
Hey, Rambler, Amazon has the book for less and has also some 2nd hand copies for a lot less. Sometimes, it pays to look in at Bibliofind for used copies. Just a suggestion! I saw the title at BJ's(like Sam's) for $17 last week. Here's the URL that lists the available title includes books and audios.
Bibliofind Offerings of Ambrose book
Harold Arnold
January 10, 2001 - 10:51 am
In my last message, I said I would make a post about the comming of the RR to San Antonio and its social and economic effect on the community. As it happened it turned out to be a tome of over a thousand words, too long to post directly here. I have put it on my Rootsweb site for those who want to read it.
The Railroads And San Antonio Sources for this post are two post 1950's magazine articles, A recent "Texas Almanac, and my memory of previous readings.
Ann Alden
January 11, 2001 - 04:30 am
Thanks, Harold, for that clickable. I am assuming that I should get a cuppa and plan on sitting here while reading this article. I just listened, through the wonders of electronics, to a tape that my uncle made about our family where he tells me that the railroad that his grandfathers worked on, was the Lake Erie and Western, fondly known as the "LE&W". So, my guess of the Nickleplate was incorrect. Both of his grandfathers plus his father and brothers all worked out of Lafayette, IN until the railroad moved the roundhouse to Rankin,IL. The whole family, Morrows, moved there. I have just visited this very, very small town in IL where my mother was born. I have seen the sight of the roundhouse plus the train station which is now the local library. Being a city girl, I cannot imagine what it was like growing up there. My grandfather quit the RR and started a much needed general store. The building where it was housed is up for sale, on the net. I couldn't believe it!! When I say small, this town might not have 10 named streets! They do have several churches and my grandparents' and GG's homes are still there. Identified by a cousin from Champaign who was also born there.
robert b. iadeluca
January 11, 2001 - 05:09 am
I don't have the experience of riding on or having a family connected with long-distance railroads. But a train is a train. I have lost track (unintended pun) of the hundreds, yea thousands of times, I have ridden on the Long Island Railroad, a commuter railroad. I know what it is like to sit next to an open window in the summer which had a screen with a very fine mesh to prevent the cinders from the steam locomotive from entering the passenger car. It was 50 percent effective. White shirts did not arrive at my office "white."
But perhaps my greatest memories are of my childhood when I would spend time down at the depot. The job of Stan, the Station Master, was not only to sell tickets but to stoke the iron pot bellied coal stove in the waiting room. We boys woulds spend easily an hour watching him grab the Morse key between two fingers and thumb and send messages to other station masters. There was a 200-yard long fence separating the east bound from the west bound tracks. The station was on the east-bound side and in the morning those commuters who were headed west toward New York City were able to cross because a gate opening had been built. When the steam engine blew its whistle two miles before arriving at Islip, a man in a small shack way down at the end of the fence would turn a wheel which pulled a wire closing the gate and would then hold up a "stop" sign preventing cars from crossing near his shack. Primitive, but it worked.
In those days there were no superhighways and, therefore, no heavy truck transportation. Most freight was carried in railroad freight cars. Islip had a freight station and another thrill as I gre older was watching the steam engine shunt cars back and forth on different sidings. I never got over watching an engine give a car a gigantic push, then back away and let the car roll on and on and on of its own weight until it hit the end of the parked train and automtically coupled. Engineers liked boys and would always give us a friendly wave.
Robby
williewoody
January 11, 2001 - 06:19 am
Isn't it great to have memories like Robby has of the railroad operations way back when. Railroading has changed over the years. Probably for the good, economically that is. But the mystique of the telegraph operator, the station master, the engineer and fireman on a snorting steam engine, the crossing guard, the express train dropping mail bags and picking up mail without stopping, all were the nostalgia of a wonderful time to have grown up.
I look forward to the upcoming discussion of railroading in the early days almost two centuries ago. It should be real interesting.
robert b. iadeluca
January 11, 2001 - 06:27 am
A half mile past the passenger rail station was a mail pick-up device. Express trains that sped past Islip had "rolling post offices." Stan would attach a mail bag to this device about a half hour before the train was scheduled to fly by. As it went by, a steel arm protruding out from the postal car would snatch up the bag and pull it into the car upon which clerks inside would immediately sort it for delivery at subsequent stations. I should add that we had mail delivery to our houses in those days (twice a day!).
I don't think I ever got over the thrill of watching and listening to a steam locomotive. I went to sleep at night with the sound of the whistle in my ears and woke up in the morning to the sound of the long-short-long-long as the early commuter train approached the crossing. On Saturays when I was older, I would watch the trains arriving -- the sound of the bell signaling the arrival, the hiss of the steam as the locomotive slowed, the squeal of the brake shoes on the rails. Then after the passengers embarked and disembarked, the sound of the bell again warning of an impending movement, the fast skidding of the wheels accompanied by the fast chug-chug-chug sound if it was a long train, the view of the sweating fireman as he shoved extra coal into the firebox and then the grin on the engineer's face as he waved to me and pulled the whistle cord. I can see why so many boys have been hypnotized into becoming railroad men.
Robby
Ella Gibbons
January 11, 2001 - 08:39 am
It wasn't too many years ago, perhaps, ten that my daughter and I took a railroad trip from Windsor, Canada to Toronto which was reminiscent of a few things Robby related. We drove to Windsor from Detroit and just pulled in to the station, locked the car and bought a ticket and boarded shortly after. My daughter wanted this experience, but after watching the lonely landscape for an hour she fell asleep and I was bored to tears as at every little town we slowed, stopped, mailbags were thrown off, a few passengers disembarked and we slowly started up again and again and again. We could have driven to Toronto in less time I'm sure.
A few things were missing from the trip, I had wanted the conductor or someone to yell out "All Aboard" - did they ever do that, other than in the movies?
Ginny
January 11, 2001 - 01:35 pm
Thank you , Everybody for those wonderful memories, I just love reading them, love trains and anything to do with them, just the whole experience. You all really write well, I was quite transported, it makes me want to get up some sort of railroad experiences thing, it's quite wonderful.
Harold thank you for that marvelous HTML page on the Railroad and San Antonio, I've put it in the heading under the Chinese Contribution, I loved the difference it made in the town, peopulation wise and the bit about "maverick," that was priceless, now we know where that got its name.
I can't get over how many of you have some experience or connection to the railroad. And as williewoody said, how things have changed. I read and enjoyed Paul Theroux adventures in riding the train through China and last night I was reading Europe by Eurail ('98-'99 Edition) and found this startling information on trains in Munich:
Changing trains in Germany is a snap. Platforms are designed in such a way that the train you need to transfer to will be standing immediately across the platform from the train in which you arrive. Since most German-Rail trains are configured the same--first class cars in the front, second -class cars in the rear, you merely cross the platform to find the same type of accommodations on the connecting train.
The new ICE2s have even more leg room, electronic destination indicatiors on the outside of the train cars, digital display seat reservation units above the seats, electronic 220V sockets for laptop computers, increased facilities for the disabled, and one car has a family compartment.
These must be new trains, indeed, the old system of the reservations ticket sticking up on the rear of the seat is what I'm more accustomed to.
How about this station:
Munich's Railway Station--the Hauptbanhof is actually a city within a city. It even has its own hotel. In addition to the regular rail-station services, all you need do is descend one level on any one of the stations's many escalators to discover a veritable city of shops, ranging from bakeries, beer stubes, fruit stands, and supermarkets, as well as the subway entrances to many of Munich's department stores. This shopping colossus extends from the Hauptbanhof all the way to Karlsplatz-Stachus-more than one quarter of a mile.
Which is better? The old or the new? Which has more glamour, more romance, the old rails or the new??
Many times in England you'll get a really old car? You'll enter right into your own compartment, the door opens just like in the movies into your own seats. Many times you'll have a door when you get ready to exit that you have to put down the window in the door itself (this is at the end of the entire car) and open the door from the outside.
I have heard many a conductor say "All Aboard!" in America, but in Europe I have only heard whistles, and seen a hand signal from the conductor.
ginny
Joan Pearson
January 11, 2001 - 05:31 pm
Just reading of your memories of the golden days of railroading makes me eager to get started! I just discovered one small problem. On Christmas, I clearly remember one of the packages one of my guys opened was
Nothing Like it in the World...
Of course it turns out to have been son #2 and the book has flown with him to the other side of the country. I will just have to make other arrangements, won't I?
One thing confuses me about the author. Am I right in assuming that he is first and foremost an historian and then an author? Or is he more like my favorite author/historian, Shelby Foote? A writer who likes to write about certain historical events? Stephen Ambrose used to be a teacher at Tulane. He must have taught history, don't you think? I get confused when I read some of your posts that he tells a good story but is a bit loose with the facts.
Then today I read this in the
Washington Post and now I know I must do a "background check" on the delightful author before we officially open:
"Our Post colleague, Civil War buff Hank Burchard, is among the alert readers who recently discovered a serious historical error in Stephen Ambrose's latest blockbuster, "Nothing Like It in the World: The Men Who Built the Transcontinental Railroad 1863-1869." On Page 292, the superstar historian writes that "George B. McClellan's uncoded orders were captured by the Confederates before the Battle of Antietam, giving Robert E. Lee a chance to read them." It turns out that Ambrose got it exactly backward: It was the Union army that captured Lee's orders. A chastened Ambrose told us his foul-up will be fixed for the next edition of the book, which has already been through nine printings. "I have no idea why I made this mistake," he said. "I am embarrassed to the tips of my toes."
Isn't this fun sharing all these bits and pieces??
Harold Arnold
January 11, 2001 - 07:41 pm
There is a short Stephen Ambrose biography on his web site. He has the usual credentials including a PhD and taught history at several Universities until 1995. Apparently he retired to devote full time to writing and is currently working on a book on the Pacific War.
Stephen Ambros Web Page
FaithP
January 12, 2001 - 03:32 pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING ON THE RAILROAD
Historian Stephen Ambrose, re: Nothing Like It In The World: Excerp from San Francisco Chronical interview:
Trained as a 19th century historian at the University of Wisconsin, Ambrose had learned all he wanted to know about ``those f-- robber barons,'' he says. ``So I didn't really want to do it.''
But he agreed to spend six months reading up on the subject, and old news reports about the railroad laborers had immediate appeal. If the workload didn't kill the men pushing west from Omaha on the Union Pacific Railroad, the marauding Indians would. Or they'd drown in rivers, or get drunk and shoot each other. If the men pushing east on the Central Pacific through the Sierra didn't freeze or suffocate in an avalanche, they'd be blown to bits while blasting granite.
Ambrose has a knack for honoring the working man and the grunt soldier. But he didn't expect to find heroism in the bosses -- Charles Crocker, Leland Stanford, Collis Huntington and Mark Hopkins -- who kept the line moving at great personal financial risk.
``I learned that these guys, the Big Four and the UP (Union Pacific) guys, put everything they had into it,'' he says. ``If they lost -- and they came close to losing -- they were going to lose it all. And that impressed me. So I went to work and wrote the book.''
For Ambrose, 64, going to work means dispatching a phalanx of his adult children, all trained historians with advanced degrees. In this case he sent them to study the newspaper archives.
Ambrose himself came out to Berkeley to study Crocker's handwritten diaries and interviews with his partners in the collection of the Bancroft Library at the University of California at Berkeley"
*******************************************************
Now in the above excerp you can see the main reason that the local paper review (Sacto Bee)was picking on Mr. Ambrose. He did characterize the Big 4 in ways our local history buffs resent. As if only they can decide what these men especially Crocker and Stanford were like. faith
Ann Alden
January 13, 2001 - 05:17 am
In the prologue of the "Nothing Like It In The World", Ambrose says this book is about "HOW" the railroads came to agreement on connecting the East and West coast of the US. Only the "HOW", not anything else.
Ginny
January 13, 2001 - 07:29 am
I think this is going to be fascinating and I know one thing, I will come out of this knowing more than I went in, which has been our experience here of most of our discussions, thanks, Faith and Ann, that is at the same time very interesting and a good point to remember.
Joan P, hope you can get a new book and join us, was counting on you!
Harold, thank you for that link, I have put it in the heading!
As we prepare to begin our look at this on February 1, (I find to my shock my youngest son has given me a large print edition, and thus I shall be flying thru these pages, for some reason it makes me feel young again and very excited about this book...go figure!)
Anyway, I wonder how you would like to take this? We usually look at sections and give our opinions like that, would sections in 100 page increments per week seem too much?
I really need to rely on you all because 100 pages in the large print is very deceptive. Where does page 100 stop in your version? Is that a good stopping place?
I feel, myself, as if we're about to set out on an historic journey.
I know I am going to come away more knowledgable.
I do note the subtitle of this book is The Men Who Built the Transcontinental Railroad 1863-1869. Perhaps the men are the focus of the book, please keep us up to date when we do hit a factual error so that we can take that into consideration.
It appears, as Ann said, very well written.
ginny
williewoody
January 13, 2001 - 04:39 pm
GINNY: After I finished Ambroses' book I passed it on to my daughter and son-in-law who read a lot, so will have to secure another. I am wondering if a chapter at a time would be appropriate? I will take a look when I get my new copy.
I am now reading a book that has a part of a chapter devoted to the same subject. Thought I would use it when we got into the discussion. The book is titled "What they didn't teach you about the wild west" by Mike Wright. He has written several other "What they didn't teach you" books.
FaithP
January 13, 2001 - 07:53 pm
Page 100 is the end of Chapter Four in my copy. 101 is Judah and the Elepant. I personally think that is certainly not to fast.But remember I have had this book for a longggggg time. I am re reading parts as we discuss, and probable will continue to as we go along. I do like the idea of a stopping place so we do not get ahead of ourselves and everyone gets a chance to comment still it is nice to have the whole gist of the book in your mind when you are thinking about it and reviewing it together. FP
Ginny
January 14, 2001 - 04:15 am
Well now, that sounds propitious, Faith, the end of Chapter 4? How does that sound to everybody?
We have such a wealth of remembrance in this discussion that we want to be sure we don't tear thru the book ("loved it, hated it, next?") and that we can discuss everything at our leisure.
Now Williewoody, when you get your book please look and see what you think, and Everybody, please decide if you want chapter by chapter, or the first Four as has been suggsted by Faith as a break.
We have to take it some way and it would be best to see what you all want?
Please please do bring here any and all other sources and books to add to the discussion. Please feel free to dialogue among yourselves and feel free to say what you think about an issue.
We here in the Books are about our own opinions and hearing in a respectful manner the opinions of others. Every opinion, in our opinion hahahaha is of value and worthy of respect. We can agree to disagree respectfully and come away enriched and with a new understanding of each other and the subject. That is our goal and our aim, please chat among yourselves here and help us meet it.
So, the Conductor is looking at his watch, is everybody getting on board?
All ashore that's ....oops! Wrong conveyance!
ginny
williewoody
January 14, 2001 - 11:27 am
GINNY: 100 pages or 4 chapters a week sounds a bit ambitious to me. If there is some deadline as to when this discussion has to be finished, then just take the total number of pages or chapters and divide by the number of weeks alloted and you have your answer.As I have indicated I have already read the book, but I know I am going to have to re-read it as we go along. I know it took me quite a while, as I am not a fast reader, nor do I get to read every day. I would rather see a slower pace, to allow for ample discussion if possible.
Ginny
January 14, 2001 - 11:58 am
OK, how about 2 chapters a week? That would be around 50 pages, or so? No we don't have a deadline of any kind, will somebody please consult their text and see where page 50 is?
That works for me, how about the rest of you??
And then we can just see and if we need to slow down we can, and if we need to speed up, we can also, it's up to us all.
ginny
FaithP
January 14, 2001 - 12:29 pm
Two Chapters is fine by me. It is just that it is difficult to start and stop as to pages since it is like breaking off in the middle of something. Discuss by Chapters is much more efficient. If they arre rreally short chapters we can adjust to that anyway.
It seems like everywherre I look now I see trains I read about trains and see movies about trains. I saw a travel log about the Dining On a Train in North Carolina that has a certain run it makes through scenic country while people dine at leisure and go back home. It is just for the dining that you go on this train trip. fp
Ginny
January 14, 2001 - 12:34 pm
I did one of those in California, Faith, the Wine Train it's called, it's an old train opened up in Napa I think it is and it serves a dinner and it was actually fun despite the signs all over the place saying NO TO TRAINS and etc., from the farmers whose land it went thru I guess it's pretty noisy.
Personally I love trains, I never did understand that issue, are any of you up on it and are they still putting signs along the track?
ginny
Ann Alden
January 14, 2001 - 01:03 pm
Ginny, 2 chapters a week sounds fine to me to start and then if we find that too much, we can slow down. There was a TV travel show on sometime this week which covered the Wine Country Train trip. How fortuitous! Hahahaha!
Am just getting started with the book as I will like reading ahead a little and then going back to discuss. I am also taking the B&N University course on this title but so far am not too impressed. They do have some great clickables!
Harold Arnold
January 14, 2001 - 07:14 pm
There appear to be 17 chapters plus the Epilouge. That averages out at a little over 21 pages each. Forty-two pages a week is no big reading deal, but we are in no hurry and I think we all agree we favor the injection of extra-book material. I vote for the two chapters a week proposal.
williewoody
January 15, 2001 - 06:57 am
Two chapters a week sounds appropriate, and it can be adjustable, depending on how much input there is.
FaithP
January 15, 2001 - 10:33 am
We are an agreeable group, are we not? I am getting anxious for a train ride. I do remember the "vacation" my mom would take one or two kids (out of the six) and go by train from Tahoe to Truckee in the summer when we had Two in and Two out per day. When we moved to the valley we took trips over Donner to Sparks to see my relatives up there. That is where so many of my Seymour uncles worked. In reading I began to wonder if Silas was another of my big Seymour family. They were in Cooperstown, then on the Eire Canal as Tug boat cap'ns and then over in Bath MI. The great greats and greats of mine came to Nevada in the 1870's about as early as the trains would bring them. Faith
rambler
January 21, 2001 - 11:06 am
Just bought the book. Requested it from the public library 3-4 weeks ago, but no response.
Ginny
January 21, 2001 - 03:06 pm
Wonderful, Rambler, I'm sorry the Library fell thru for you, it's apparently a very popular book!
Thanks to you all for expressing your opinions on the speed of the discussion, we can start out with 2 Chapters a week and certainly slow down if we want to, the choice will be up to you all.
And here, just to get you in the mood, is a MARVELOUS MIDI, it takes a while to load but you will not be sorry!
Chattanooga Choo Choo Aren't the effects wonderful?
Hurry and get your tickets before the train pulls out!
ginny
rambler
January 21, 2001 - 03:13 pm
ginny: Re Marvelous Midi: All I get is mysterious choices I
don't understand. Please explain what to do. (All I've ever
gotten from computers is mysterious choices I don't understand!) I am
fast losing interest.
Ginny
January 21, 2001 - 03:15 pm
Rambler, I will get our techies Pat W and Jane in here and maybe they can help, it depends upon what you have installed on your computer!
ginny
rambler
January 21, 2001 - 03:22 pm
Warning: I have an iMac, purchased 1 year ago. AOL 4.0. System 8.6.
Beyond that, I don't know offhand.
williewoody
January 21, 2001 - 04:47 pm
RAMBLER: I'm like you. I have no idea what these computer experts are saying. I think we are like most everyone. We have computers but haven't the foggiest idea how they work, or do we even care as long as we can get to where we want to go MOST OF THE TIME>
patwest
January 21, 2001 - 04:50 pm
Hi Rambler... I fired up the Mac and using Netscape... loaded the Choo Choo.. It started playing ... I got one blast of sound and that was it... Some Midis are just not written for Macs... I wasn't given any choices ... it just wouldn't play.
I suspect it would be the same with IE 5...
Ginny
January 21, 2001 - 06:24 pm
Well now I hate that because that particular midi is a big band sound playing Chattanooga Choo Choo, but heckers, we don't need that, we can just, some of us, do the chug sounds and others of us hum, and those who know the words can sing, who needs music???
ginny
FaithP
January 21, 2001 - 07:16 pm
Ginny I have Windows Media Player and when I click your Chatanoga Choo Choo it poped up loaded and started playing, then I minimize it and go on doing what I want, like this post. The song is still playing and I am going to try to save it. with the New type media player my son put on I havent learnd how to save yet. On my mac I had a Midi player and could do the same as I am doing now it just looked different and really was simpler.ED: You go to ZDNet.com/ Downloads/ page and see if you can get a player for the Imac and download it.fp
patwest
January 21, 2001 - 07:46 pm
It sounds great on a PC.. I use Winamp and Real Player...
And I borrowed the Bose speakers from an old hi-fi set.
seldom958
January 21, 2001 - 10:51 pm
Have others noticed that the modern version of the song no longer says "pardon me boy" and "boy can you give me a shine."
"Boy" in that 1940 song was refering to an adult black man.
I'm thankfull there has been some change in our society.
But wonder about republicans.
From a 77 yr old honkie.
Harold Arnold
January 22, 2001 - 08:32 am
Regarding Ginny’s “Chattanooga cho cho Midi link: On my machine, when I click the link to my surprise, it brought-up IrfanView 32 bit viewer for WinNT, Win9x and Win2000. This player was new to me, apparently installed by Dell at the factory. It played the Midi automatically and beautifully. Ginny is right, it has great big band sound.
I note from a Google search that the Irfanview player is apparently available for download at the following site:
Irfan View
rambler
January 25, 2001 - 08:49 am
This has nothing to do with the book, but it's about trains, so I'll post it now.
About a dozen years ago we took the chunnel train from London to Paris. As I recall, it's about a 3 hour ride and you're under water only about 20 minutes. Most of the time you're crossing northern France to get to Paris.
We figured we'll never do it again, so let's go first class, which we did. Got served a nice lunch, with wine. We arrived in more-or-less central Paris, with just a brief taxi ride to our hotel.
On the train, our assigned seats faced backward, which I hate. The car was half-empty, so we switched to forward-facing seats. Maybe 15-18 years ago we took a train from Oslo to Stockholm. Our only reason for taking a train rather than a plane was to see the countryside. Our seats not only faced backward, we had no window, and all the other seats were taken. Worse yet, there were drunken young people raising noisy hell.
Earlier, I told the conductor we wanted to go to Stockholm, and he told us where to get off and change trains. When we got to that place, it was out in the country, growing dark, and deserted. I said, "We aren't getting off here". Our train's destination was Stockholm. Perhaps the conductor didn't understand English.
losalbern
January 25, 2001 - 12:59 pm
I decided to try my luck at downloading " Chattanooga Choo Choo" and then made the mistake of downloading it to a file other than Windows "Media". So it took a little time to find it and move it and then go the Start/Programs/ Assesories/ Media route. And by George it worked! That is a great tune. I just may go buy the book! Losalbern
losalbern
January 31, 2001 - 04:16 pm
Does everyone have their nose in the book? Gosh, I wrote the previous message 6 days ago! But I did want to say that I lucked out at our local library and managed to get a copy of "Nothing Like It In The World" and it is very interesting. The opening chapters go into a lot of detail about the early days of Council Bluffs Ia. and Omaha, Nebraska where the start of the Union Pacific RR. is about to begin. I was born raised and educated in Omaha that setting is very familiar to me. Never realized that Abe Lincoln was such a prominent figure in pressing for the rails westward.
Ginny
January 31, 2001 - 04:44 pm
Not to fear, Losalburn (and I just now see your post, so glad you got to enjoy the tune, I plan to play it tomorrow morning when we all assemble here to hear the Conductor say "All Aboard!)"
Boy I think you all were right though, on the Two Chapters thing, I hope to get up early and get IN here but I'm going to tell you right now we need ALL of you and any information you can give as to all the events in this thing, it's a swirl of names and places and events. We will all come out of this hopefully knowing a lot.
Now I'm off to see if I can find a photo of what Ambrose describes as the brakes on each car, the way they used to have to stop the train, each car had a brakeman and wheel on it. I'm thinking that that was that wheel on top? Or have I just gone nuts?
See you all tomorrow, can't wait to hear your impressions and thoughts.
ginny
Ginny
February 1, 2001 - 05:09 am
All Aboard!!
Welcome this morning to what cannot fail to be one of our most exciting discussions in a long time, Stephen Ambrose's Nothing Like it in the World.
BECAUSE of the wealth of knowledge both concerning railroads and history here assembled and our own Ann Alden's being able to bring here to us the results of a course she is simultaneously taking about this book, we will emerge having the very best experience possible and learning, I hope, a lot.
You need not have any prior knowledge to discuss this book, you will find enough knowledge here among our posters that could be put in a book itself!
The purpose of our discusions is to talk about the ideas and issues in a book and to talk to each other as we enjoy looking at the author's presentation of facts: are they indesputable? The author certainly has the credentials, doesn't he? Did you read the acknowledgements and the Introduction? Very impressive.
As always here in our SeniorNet Online Book discussions we welcome all opinions and we respectfully treat every opinion as valuable. We can learn a lot from each other.
Sooooo
On with the show!
I am still monkeying with some topics for your consideration in the heading, but they are readable, right under the picture of The John Bull in the heading. That's where they will stay and you can add to the list by posting your own queries right in your post.
So many elements to look at, my impression this morning is where have all those pioneers gone? Where are they? Have we lost that pioneer spirit in America? How is it that so many inventions came about then and we can't put a half way decent train on the tracks in America now? We ought to be the leaders in rail technology, by the accounts I read here, it should be us. Why is it not?
That's where I am looking at it this morning, were you all aware of the conditions of travel so short a time ago? Don't you love that quote about the power of the engine? Do you think that's why people are so enamored of the train? All that power? Didn't you love Ambrose's discussion of his own ride and all those unlabelled levers in the engine?
Don't you wish you had your own train? hahahaah
That's what passes for thought from me this morning, I'm overwhelmed with the people, the facts, the history, the excitement, the ideas, the whole book, and still a bit confused as to WHY Council Bluffs?
More more more later, what are your thoughts, which are the most important things here.
ginny
williewoody
February 1, 2001 - 07:44 am
I read the book some time ago, long before there was any thought of a discussion on Seniornet. So I will have to start all over again. Just quickly a couple of thoughts. Yes I was somewhat surprised at first about Lincoln's early part in the building of the railroad to Calif. But then after I thought about it, I realized that his early career as a lawyer in Illinois where he apparently did a lot of work for the Illinois Central Railroad, probably sowed the seeds for his energetic approach to railroad expansion west to Calif. after he became president.
Also, the territories of Oregon and California were virtually on the other side of the earth, since it took months to travel from the east coast to them, by any means. I am sure Lincoln realized that if we were to carry forward our "manifest destiny" as envisioned by President Jefferson, we must find a shorter means of travel west.
Got to read again ... be back later.
rambler
February 1, 2001 - 08:28 am
Judging from the Acknowledgments, Ambrose had to read (or at least skim) a lot of material not very relevant to Alice Mayhew's question: How did they build that railroad?
He makes the point that there are no living witnesses to the endeavor, so "I couldn't do any interviewing". Of course, he means of eyewitnesses; he did a lot of interviewing of railroad historians, buffs, etc.
In the Introduction, an interesting observation by (ex-Union general) Grenville Dodge that the railroad could not have been built without Civil War veterans and their experience. "It was the war", says Ambrose, "that taught them to think big, how to organize grand projects, how to persevere". That thought had not occurred to me.
Harold Arnold
February 1, 2001 - 11:01 am
My interest in the first two chapters centered on the lives of some of the principal players. I too did not realize Lincoln was so active in the pre Civil War Railroads. Also now I know how Stanford University got its name. Old Leland Stanford couldn’t take his money with him, could he?
While these were interesting people, my interest centered on the engineers particularly Dodge. Already before the Civil War began Dodge was an engineer with the idea that the transcontinental link would come and that he would play a role in building it. I think he was rather astute in identifying Omaha as the eastern terminal. Even more astute he appears to have acquired land that later figured in the route. The Civil War came as a necessary event and again he played his part picking up a Generals title in the process. The latter achievement for prominent Americans with ability was not uncommon on both sides. Also isn’t the political squabble over the different routes typical of the current period. Jeff Davis as Secretary of War would have nothing to do with the Omaha- Platt river route proposed by Dodge. Again the war was necessary before the decision could be made. Incidentally the Southern route favored by Davis was completed in 1882 giving the nation a second link connecting the Southeast through Texas, New Mexico and Arizona to Los Angles and San Diego (see my post #48). This Southern route was shorter and easier and cheaper since the altitudes that had to be scaled were not so great and otherwise the topography crossed was not so difficult. Other links came later including the rout across Canada to the north.
In another book I was impressed with another pioneer engineer that figured prominently in 30 years earlier in the construction of English Railroads. The book was entitled The Great Iron Ship by James Dugan (out of print). Though it was really the biography of a ship (The Great Eastern) it centered on the life of its designer one Isambard Kingdom Brunell.. Brunell’s Father was French and had emigrated to the U.S in the 1790’s. He was in New York and worked with Robert Fulton in building some of the early steamboats. The father was himself a brilliant engineer and because of the lack of engineering challenge in the U.S., he went to Britain where he participated in early RR design. The father held several patents including one that made tunnel construction under rivers possible.
The son, Isambard followed in his fathers profession and early played a major role in the design and construction of English Railroads. He was noted for his tunnel under the Themes and several bridges including a suspension bridge that still stands. Isambard was almost killed in an accident involving construction of a tunnel. Many construction workers were not so lucky. Later Brunell turned to Ships design, and today he is most famous for this work including the design of the Great Eastern the forerunner of the modern luxury liner. Another of his early ships, The Great Britain still exists as a museum ship in England. Does anyone remember the event that the Great Eastern is most remembered for today?
rambler
February 1, 2001 - 01:20 pm
Brief comments on points that Ginny has raised:
Why is America no longer a world leader in passenger railroad transit? Obvious answers include the vastness of our continent and the invention of the automobile and airplane. If we're going short distances, we typically drive. For longer distances or if we're in a hurry, we fly.
Many places in Europe and elsewhere were laid out before the automobile was invented. So when you drive to your destination, the streets may be barely wide enough to accommodate one car, and there's no place to park. The obvious answer: Take the train.
We do seem to have one good passenger train, the Acela between Boston and New York (speaking of places where there's no place to park!). It averages close to 80 m.p.h. (very slow by Japanese standards). When a derailment occurs, as it will, publicity will surely be abundant. (Auto manufacturers and airlines buy lots of advertising in the media. Railroads virtually none.)
On Ambrose's use of the term "argonaut": It seems to me an indefensible affectation. My newer dictionary, no slouch, does not list it. The older one, a tome weighing maybe 10 pounds, has this as its second definition (after the Greek mythological Jason and the argonauts): "One in search of something, esp. of something dangerous and rewarding; an adventurer".
Ginny
February 1, 2001 - 01:49 pm
OH good points, Williewoody, Rambler and Harold~!~~ good points.
Good analogy, Rambler, on the "argonauts, " I loved your take on the indefensible part, I guess here Ambrose is telling us of his admiration for these pioneers of rail as they set out by boat on their great adventure.
And weren't the distances, as you remarked, Williweoody, vast? I had forgotten somewhere in the distant recesses of my school history but was brought up short by plank roads and no white man West of Nebraska. I was really taken aback by Abraham Lincoln's intense involvement, if he had lived wonder what difference there might have been in the implementation of it. I was shocked at what it cost to run track, $33,000....per.....? Whatever it was it was horrendous by any standards and that was a low estimate I think they said.
What a good point you make about European trains versus our own planes and technology, and HERE is a fascinating thing no train buff should miss, it's huge, but let it download, you won't want to miss this:
PBS Special This MONDAY FEBRUARY 5, on the "Lost Trains of America!" I am fascinated by this topic, you can SEE somebody was thinking of innovations!
Harold, you said,
This Southern route was shorter and easier and cheaper since the altitudes that had to be scaled were not so great and otherwise the topography crossed was not so difficult. You know, I was most confused by all the routes and the suggestions and now it appears the Southern route was shorter and easier in the long run, so was it politics that kept it from being used, after all?
Weren't you shocked at the dimensions of the Platte River? I was. Is it still like that today? An inch deep? One of my great regrets of this book is the lack of adequate maps. For instance, I REALLY wanted to see the point at which the rivers change and flow to the Pacific Ocean but it's not in the inside cover maps.
What did they mean the Free States blocked the Slave States and vice versa?
Now Harold and Rambler have both mentioned Dodge. I spent quite a while examining the photos of all these men and I must say unequivocally that I have never heard of anybody with the personality of Mr. Crocker, I have never heard of such confidence. Do you think this is possibly a little historical embellishment, or were these men giants in any time?
I had missed that reference to the influence of the Civil War on the building of the railroad, Rambler, thank you for that.
This is very exciting, to me, and we're just getting started!
ginny
losalbern
February 1, 2001 - 01:51 pm
Chapter 1 didn't define how Age Lincoln managed to reach Council Bluffs where he met the surveyor Dodge in 1859. But if he were able to travel by rail, it is possible, but not too probable, that he and I have ridden in the same passenger car, or at least one similar to it. In November, 1942, the Selective Service people had seen fit to commence my induction into WWll armed forces and the first step was to meet early one morning at the Omaha Union Station for a train trip to the Induction Center at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. About 30 of us confused prospects were herded into the last car of a train. Much to our surprise, we found ourselves as passengers in an elegant, beautifully restored and refurbished ancient passenger car with its plush green velvet upholstered (horsehair?) seats and pretty little window curtains sporting strips of tiny chenille balls sewed to their edges. There were even gleaming brass spittoons at either end of the car. It was apparent that this beautiful car had been,like us, drafted from its home in some railroad museum, to do its part to relieve the crunch of the wartime shortage of rail cars. I have never since ridden in a more beautiful setting. I have often wondered where it came from and where it went after it was taken out of its wartime service.
rambler
February 1, 2001 - 03:12 pm
Ginny: According to my Rand McNally Road Atlas, the continental
divide occurs (on the map inside our book's front cover) in Wyoming
about halfway between Rawlins and Green River, near the town of Table
Rock. That may be where the rivers start flowing to the
Pacific.
Just found this: Bottom of p. 45.
Harold Arnold
February 1, 2001 - 03:48 pm
Rambler you make a good point in your message 89 emphasizing the Dodge observation that the transcontinental link “could not have been built without Civil War veterans and their experience.” I like the Ambrose colorful verbiage that you quoted on the Dodge observation, "It was the war", says Ambrose, "that taught them to think big, how to organize grand projects, how to persevere". I think this short sentence is a great example typical of the Ambrose writing style. I would describe it as a colorful and “21st century hip” use of words to tell history to modern Americans in a way they understand and will listen to. There is not too much danger of falling a sleep even by readers with limited historical interest. The only time I think Ambrose has overdone his wordsmith craft was maybe in some of his oral script in the PBS Special on the Lewis and Clark event. There he may have to me come across as a bit corny in some of his scenes. But for me I have always found his history related prose a real joy to read.
Ginny perhaps I should elaborate more on the economics of the Southern route in comparison to the Platte river route. To begin we all know why the Secretary of War, Jefferson Davis during the Buchanan administration advocated the southern route. It would have promoted the introduction of the southern slave system in the West. For the same reason the free state parties opposed the southern route and supported the Platte river choice. I don’t think economics much entered the equation at that time.
After the war I think there was more to it than the degree of construction difficulty and initial construction cost. I don’t know how detailed the 1865 economic studies were, but I suspect that even if the post civil war alternate routes had been subject to today’s economic evaluations using the 1865 input conditions, the Platte river route would have won. This is because immediately after the war the flow of goods and people using the Railway was from the north and northeast across the continent to the North California towns of San Francisco and Sacramento. The additional cost of shipping northeast cargo and people south to New Orleans then west through Texas, New Mexico etc to Los Angles and then back north to San Francisco and beyond to Oregon would have favored the Platte route. True I’m sure politics did enter the decision in as much as the mood of the country was not about to reward the rebel states by building them a railway, but I suspect the overall economics would have led to the same result. Fifteen years later after reconstruction and substantial economic growth things were different and the southern economies both east and west had grown to where they could support the second east/west connection.
Losalbern. I remember in late 1944 and 1945 cross-country troop trains used a special sleeping car. I understood these were very old passenger cars that had been saved from the scrap yard by the wartime demand for cars. They stripped their interiors and built a cheap series of bench seats extending almost across the car at 90 degrees from one side. This means the access isle was along the other side of the train. There were maybe two upper folding bunks so at night there would be a series of three tiered bunks one above the other. But there was nothing luxurious about these cars. On the contrary, these were for enlisted personnel and other conventional Pullman cars were always provided for officers (or POW”s). It sounds to me like you got the personal car of a 19th century Railway president.
FaithP
February 1, 2001 - 04:41 pm
I think there is no confusion about why the north route was chosen. If money is politics and visa versa then it was political. The big money came from Northern Californians.The big four. They wanted the pass open over the Sierra's at any cost and cost it did. Yet it made millionaires many times over of these men. It was a mighty venture and the most grueling part of the building of the railway and the opening of the west coast to incoming eastern traffic. It brought all my relatives as far as the Sierras and most of them stayed there in and around the original settlement of Wadsworth, Beckwith, and then on up into the mountains. Faith
Ann Alden
February 2, 2001 - 06:19 am
I just arrived this morning in this discussion. Have had a busy week and yesterday was just too much. My ISP was down, I had a live book discussion and a creative writing class. So, here we are and I am so fascinated by all of this discussion. Just finished reading the posts and am amazed by the scholarly comments and the far reaching knowledge of you all.
Laselburn, are you saying that you were an antique even in 1940? LOL!
My love for trains comes from a family of railway employees. My ggrandfather was a roundhouse worker as a blacksmith and he invented a spike puller for his company, Lake Erie and Western, but never applied for a patent. Of couse, someone else did because they were used everywhere.
Back to this question as to route. I wonder if the Lewis and Clarke expedition results had something to do with the route chosen also? The shortest route wasn't the best route except that it would have made an even bigger port of New Orleans and brought a lot of money to the south. Already, Atlanta was a railway center and still is today. Isn't that why Sherman burned Atlanta?
williewoody
February 2, 2001 - 07:22 am
I am really enjoying reading all the early comments. If this keeps up, it should be a great discussion. My own personal opinion as to why the Platte River Route was selected is that it was Political. Of course, if Jeff Davis could have had his way it would have been the southern route. We all know why Jeff didn't have his way.
rambler
February 2, 2001 - 11:23 am
I don't know how to correct that title line. The edit command does
not seem to permit it.
On Lincoln's ability to pick Glenville
Dodge's brain, Dodge said, "He
shelled my woods completely and got all the information I'd
collected". Lincoln, like a very recent President, seems to be a
"quick study" who can compartmentalize his brain. That is, he could
shut out slavery and the other issues of the day and concentrate
entirely, when necessary, on something like railroad matters. (It is
pointed out later that railroads were always second on Lincoln's mind,
behind slavery.)
At age 22, Lincoln was a strong advocate for
railroads, but had never seen one!
Rather feisty of him to sue his
client, the Illinois Central, and win. Apparently the IC thought
enough of him to retain him as their lawyer anyway? That point is not
clear to me.
On the necessary engineering (p. 25). We tend to think
of building the transcontinental railway as a gigantic task of laying
track, blasting tunnels, etc. (The book's cover sleeve encourages this
notion.) But the engines and cars themselves had to be redesigned,
almost reinvented, and then tested for reliability, before or while
track was being laid.
williewoody
February 2, 2001 - 12:04 pm
In answer to a couple of the questions posed. The Chinese actually began to immigrate to America at least a decade before the start of building the railroad. They came to seek their fortune in the California gold fields. During the 1840's China suffered repeated crop failures and high unempolyment. Shipping agents lured peasant farmers, describing California as Gum San (the Gold Mountain). Many of them returned home to their families after gleaning a small profit from working played out mines left by caucasion miners.
Answering another question. "What is a 4-4-0? " That is the wheel alignment of the steam locomotive of the period. In other words, four large driving wheels preceded by a pilot truck of four wheels, with no other wheels under the cab of the engine. The picture on the front dust cover portrays this better than I can explain. This particular style of steam locomotive became known as an American Type.
losalbern
February 2, 2001 - 04:04 pm
When envisioning the building of what turned out to be the Central Pacific railroad, the backers really had some big, big logistic problems. I can't help but wonder why they didn't begin that railhead in San Francisco rather than Sacramento. Ambrose didn't go into much detail about how they managed to lug all the materials from the docks in San Francisco to the line's beginning point in Sacramento before laying any rail, a distance of roughly 50 miles. And talk about obstacles, doesn't it blow your mind that most of that hardware, rails, locomotives, cars and most eveything else had to be shipped around the horn by Clipper ship? Those people dreamed really big!
Henry Misbach
February 2, 2001 - 04:34 pm
I doubt that I can add much to this erudite discussion, and some of it is just frankly amusement.
As to the use of the term Argonaut, possibly Those-who-were-old-enough-to-know-better-but-went-anyway would have been equally as accurate, but rather ponderous for repeated use. I thought it was only the contemporary generation that had lost the Classics, but apparently I was wrong.
Council Bluffs, Iowa, is just on the Chicago side of what was then a formidable obstacle to further westward travel, namely, the Missouri River. I grew up next to it further south, and I would find it both frustrating and enticing to be able to see so far west, yet not be able to go there without finding a way across, as did Lincoln and Dodge.
Having driven the Platte River valley route to Omaha from the West, I can testify that it does have an easy gradient. Since I did most of it at night, I didn't get a very good look at the terrain. But I would certainly recommend against driving continuously from Salt Lake City to Omaha, which I then did. Part of the mystery to me is less why I even attempted it than how I did it. There were no gas stations for miles and miles back in the '60's.
As to the competition between Slave and Free (read Southern and Northern)states, you may recall the so-called Oxbow route for stagecoaches, which shows the South in the driver's seat.
I do find Ambrose's discussion quite good, but, in this day and time, I might have expected at least passing reference to another European country that built many miles of railroad between 1853 and 1866, namely, Prussia. It's hard to find much written about it, as other questions of a more institutional nature dominate the historiography of Germany in the 19th century. One recent history of Germany claims that the statutory mileage of rail jumped 5-fold in that period, and it creeps into most historical discussions of that time that Von Moltke's mastery of the military use of the railroad was unequalled on the continent then.
rambler
February 2, 2001 - 04:38 pm
Has this thought occurred to others at this site? Tom Brokaw calls the
people born circa 1920, who endured the great Depression, won World
War II, and led us into postwar prosperity, "The Greatest Generation".
They were indeed wonderful, durable, indominatable folks.
Yet, what
about the people born circa 1840, who won (or lost) the Civil War,
endured economic privation, and went on to build, under hardships we
can never imagine, the railroad we are discussing and a good share of
the American society we live in? Can anyone consider them less than
contenders for the title,
"greatest" generation? You, maybe. Not me.
FaithP
February 2, 2001 - 04:59 pm
Rambler I like your style. I was in that book discussion Greatest Generation etc. and was often frustrated by the use of the superlative as it leaves no room for other great deeds by other generations of people. I think the people of my great grandparents generation were braver than we can imagine. fp
Henry Misbach
February 2, 2001 - 07:39 pm
The Butterfield Overland Mail was the name I was trying to put with the Oxbow route through the southern states. May have run the first time in 1859; the coaches were built in New York using 14th century strap suspension. Of course at the time, they were supposedly pratical, while the railroad still had to prove itself.
seldom958
February 2, 2001 - 09:48 pm
Hey gang.
It will make the book more interesting, if you have the bucks and time, to ride AMTRAK's California Zephyr. You don't have to go all the way from to San Francisco to Chicago.
But the section from Sacramento to Reno over the Sierra is outstanding!
From Salt Lake City to Denver is also awsome.
Wife and I also love the one o'night Sacramento to Grand Junction, CO trip. But at our age we need a bedroom.
Try it. You will like it.
Ginny
February 3, 2001 - 03:15 am
Hello, Everybody, what wonderful comments, I'm struck dumb (almost) by the depth of the knowledge and experience here.
I would like to address everybody individually and put some of your queries in the heading and add a couple of my own, and thank you very much for all your input here.
First off, please look at this splendid
lithograph from Harper's Weekly of February 10, 1872, by W.L. Shepherd, showing a figure on the tracks signalling the train to stop. The brakeman in the center is turning the brake wheel. In front of him is the woodbox, the older engines ran on wood.
Note the engineer peering out of the right side of the cab, grasping the throttle with his left hand and the "Johnson Bar," or reverse lever (what was THAT for?) with his right.
That was not what I thought the brake wheel looked like? I thought it was on top of the box car type of thing, can anybody shed some light here?
Why would they make a design that made the engineer have to lean out sideways like that to see ahead?
I have decided that my own contribution here will be bringing illustrations and old ballads of trains (to the point that I actually ran my husband out of the house last night playing replaying and replaying a great MIDI I've got of Willie Nelson singing The City of New Orleans, coming up Monday. hahahaha)
"Good morning, America, how ARE you!" haahahahaha I love train songs.
When I read in the Ambrose about the plank roads, it jogged my memory, I have an illustration somewhere in an old book of just such a road and am frantically looking for same, but was astounded at the bales and bales of ballads concerning railroad disasters, you may yourself be able to sing some. From time to time I plan to put them here, from the book Scalded to Death by the Steam, seems that no disaster was without a ballad, there are literally hundreds and very poignant, too.
Harold, in your archival photo treasure trove, are there any trains? Harold has a true treasure in family photos of the era and I hope and cross fingers we might get to see some of the early trains, etc.
OK, on with your comments and the show, and thank you all for responding so well to each other!!!
I want to ask you all this question this morning. I think I'm the odd man out here: When you know something about a subject and you read a book like this, I believe you may tend to skip over known material, like, yeah yeah yadda yadda tell me something I
don't know?
Is that the way this book is for you?
How do the historians among you see this book so far? How do you think Ambrose (we know his amazing credentials and that of his family from reading the Intro and the Acknowledgements) is presenting this material?
How about those of you who are train buffs? How do YOU think so far he's presenting this?
How about those of you who like trains, like me, but who otherwise seem to have forgotten what history you knew? How does this seem to you?
I guess I would also like to know whom you think this book was written for?
See the next few posts for comments upon YOUR comments and please remark on the ideas of others, as well? I think this is one of our most promising discussions and is totally full of MEN! I love that aspect if I may say so, and look forward to every voice here, so look in the next several posts about your own thoughts?
ginny
Ginny
February 3, 2001 - 03:34 am
We've been asked to implement something you can see at the very top of your post window, the title bar? In discussion such as this one where people might like to go back and find a particular topic, could you, if it's not too confining, place in the title bar perhaps one of the topics you are discussing so that in the OUTLINE mode a person can instantly find again the very good information you are giving?
This discussion will be archived, who knows who may want to read it in future, what school class. If you would try to do that it would help. If you don't like the idea, please don't!
That PBS special has a wonderful write up, (see the very last thing in the heading above)....it's THIS MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5 at 9 pm here and apparently the technology continued and we did have in this country, trains which went 100 miles per hour in the 30's and 40's. Find out what happened to them and why Monday night on the Lost Trains of America on the program American Experience!
Harold mentioned Stanford and made the connection which I had missed with Stanford University. As well as Dodge. I guess that's where the town got its name too?
I am confused by all the players here and the lack of prominence given any one of them, the narrative confuses me.
I was fascinated by your mention of The Great Iron Ship and will put your question in the heading, it's a good one, thanks!!!
Losalbern, what a wonderful memory of that elegant car and I bet you are right, I wish there were some way we could find out what it had been used for, you may have, indeed, been riding in Abe Lincoln's own car. What a memory, thank you so much for that!
Rambler, I need a better map, thank you for that Rawlins/ Green River info and the Table Rock, is that not fascinating? The place where the river flows to the Pacific, I would like to stand there!
Harold what a wonderful, reasoned quote:
After the war I think there was more to it than the degree of construction difficulty and initial construction cost. I don’t know how detailed the 1865 economic studies were, but I suspect that even if the post civil war alternate routes had been subject to today’s economic evaluations using the 1865 input conditions, the Platte river route would have won.
I am learning so much from this discussion, but hey: Ambrose is writing in 2001. Wonder why he didn't make these points?????
Thank you for that explanation.
More....
Ginny
February 3, 2001 - 04:00 am
Ann, we are so glad to see you here! Please let no stone remain unturned and bring to us from your class any question they may be asking. What an interesting development, the spike puller? Wonder why he didn't patent it?????
I was interested in the book to read about getting RID of stone ties because in Europe I just saw same on the rr tracks and thought it a NEW invention!!!
I did ask about Atlanta and my husband concurs with you that that was one of the reasons Sherman burned it: the railroad hub.
You don't happen to have any old photos from your own family's history with the railroads, do you?
Rambler, the Edit only works for 30 minutes would you like for me to fix that line for you? Great point on the continuing changing of design of the engines and cars!!
Williewoody, thank you for that background into the Chinese immigration, so we can lay to rest permanently the myth of the Chinese imported solely to build the railroad?
I also appreciate your explanation of the 4-4-0 and am putting up tomorrow some more photos which I hope you will help identify the type, loved this:
Answering another question. "What is a 4-4-0? " That is the wheel alignment of the steam locomotive of the period. In other words, four large driving wheels preceded by a pilot truck of four wheels, with no other wheels under the cab of the engine. The picture on the front dust cover portrays this better than I can explain. This particular style of steam locomotive became known as an American Type.
Here is a chance for those of us who do not know to learn, once and for all, what these numbers actually MEAN, there seem to be hundreds of configurations!
Losalbern: That's a great question and is going in the heading! The whole THING boggles my mind, seems like something in a story, all those workers, kinda like India or Egypt today, using only sweat and muscle, it boggles.
Henry: haha on the Argonauts, I agree, Those-who-were-old-enough-to-know-better-but-went-anyway
is a bit cumbersome. I don't remember actually, the motivations for the real Argonauts, Jason had his own purpose, need to look that one back up, maybe goldernauts might be more descriptive for this group.
I really love the personal descriptions you all bring whether by driving (Henry) or riding (Seldom) and would like to hear more about it.
For instance, I have taken the train from Chicago, took the children in those sleeper cars, from Chicago to Seattle. It is not the one called the Empire Builder, it's the other one. It was an amazing journey across a vast and amazing country, and one I think everybody should take, do you think I was actually riding in the very trail these people used? The thought is mind boggling. I will look up the schedule on Amtrak.
I now want to go again after reading all your comments.
Loved that about staring over the Missouri, Henry, captures it so well.
And thank you for the explanation of the Slave and Free states being Southern and Northern, and the Butterfield Overland Mail route, the stagecoach routes are fascinating to me, just found an old map of same, hope to get it up here in the coming weeks.
Was Prussia's development of the railroad primarily for military use?
Am I the only one who remembers what the purpose of the Interstate system was and who started it?
Rambler, what a wonderful question about who
was the Greatest Generation, into the heading it goes, what do you all think??
Faith, I tend to agree with you, what an adventurous spirit, it's two entirely different things, to me, tho. On the one hand, going west to possibly make a fortune in gold, might have risks, but look at these men, look at Crocker. He had almost no education yet felt he was equal to any task in life, totally confident, have never read of anybody like him.
Contrast that with going to war. Not a very good or happy send off, no gold, not much adventure, a different purpose and a much different end....maybe that was what Brokaw was trying to say.
What do you think?
Henry what is "14th century strap suspension?"
Seldom, tell us more about these journeys. The Books is going to San Francisco in 2002, is a short train ride doable for us and which route would you suggest? I'd love to fit in something historic since we're reading this book.
ginny
rambler
February 3, 2001 - 05:58 am
Ostensibly, I think the purpose of the interstate system was military:
To be able to rush armed forces across long distances in a hurry.
(Like maybe the Mexicans are going to attack El Paso?) While
Eisenhower was still a colonel or something, he ordered or was ordered
to travel from east coast to west by automobile or something, and was
appalled by how long it took. The interestate system was begun under
his Presidential administration.
I think the real purpose (not
Eisenhower's necessarily) was to provide a massive amount of work for
roadbuilders and generate a massive appetite for cars. In other words,
money.
Ginny: I began trying to edit the heading on my #99
immediately after posting, well within the 30 minute limit. But it
wouldn't work. Perhaps the heading was just too long?
Henry
mentions a long drive over the great plains, with few gas stations, in
the '60s. I was driving in the middle of South Dakota one night, low
on gas, couldn't find a filling station. Finally had to park in some
little town, adjacent to a gas station, and go to sleep until the
station opened next morning.
We took Amtrak from Chicago to San
Francisco about 10 years ago. If I had it to do over, I'd fly to
Denver and take Amtrak to S.F. Not much scenery in Illinois, Iowa,
Nebraska.
williewoody
February 3, 2001 - 07:46 am
Regarding the question of are there any in todays generation from the mold of Crocker. Off hand I would mention Bill Gates for one. There are surely many others.
Rambler: you said way back there that the generation of the Civil War period and the westward expansion should be considered as the "Greatest Generation." Yes, I would agree they should be considered. And I am sure Tom Brokaw did. But why stop there. Go back to the generation that founded this country. Certainly, those who fought to set us free from Britain suffered great physical hardships as well as economic disasters. Somewhere in my files I have an account of what happened to the 50 plus men who signed the Declaration of Independence. Of course, it is all relative to the size of the population at the time. So I guess what Brokaw is saying , based on the vast number of people effected, the generation beginning in 1920 is the"Greatest" which I kinda like since I am a part of it.
Ann Alden
February 3, 2001 - 08:17 am
Ginny, no pictures that I can remember but will check with some cousins in Champaign, IL. They do have a wealth of pics and brought them to the family reunion last July.
I am dissappointed with the Barnes and Noble class but will persist as I always expect things to get better.
I did just read about Brunnel who was the son of a French engineer who migrated to the US, couldn't find enough engineering challenges here so went to England. He and his son are well known in England for bridges and trains, I believe.
I am so thrilled to be reading some of the expert historical opinions here. I am like Ginny, in that my interest is that I love trains and their history. I don't own models, or a collection of books on the subject, but I do enjoy remembering what I heard as a child.
We took a trip last summer on the Rocky Moutaineer and VIA, across Canada, and now I see three trips here mentioned that I definitely want to attempt.
If my memory serves me right: Crocker founded Crocker National Bank in SF, Huntingdon had much to do with banking and also the Huntington Library in LA, Stanford, of course, the university and Mark Hopkins probably did other things but all that I can think of is the Mark Hopkins Hotel in SF. After doing a little reading about Mark Hopkins, I find that his money came from the railroads that he helped to finance. The hotel was built on the old Hopkins property, probably after he died.
Henry Misbach
February 3, 2001 - 11:49 am
Rambler: I sure can relate to that! On that same trip, my windshield got so caked with insects I couldn't see. After many dark Interstate junctions, I finally noticed a farmhouse with a light on, drove over to it, and got a wet washrag from them to clean my windshield. Drove on and found an all-night restaurant; when I got out of my car, I nearly fell on my face, staggered like a drunk. Shows you how true it is that fatigue is as deadly as strong drink.
The Interstate Highway System was put in place by a man whose reputation is still quite intact (for me, that's an admission), Dwight D. Eisenhower. As I recall, his purpose was partly related to the Cold War, namely, to facilitate military deployment just in case. Of course, if the Prussian government did build their railroad for military purposes, they would still be trumped by a much older example: Julius Caesar, who would have built a railroad if he could have. The Roman Roads always had a quasi-military purpose.
As for anyone like Crocker now, it's hard to think of any. I don't know what sort of training Ted Turner brought to the founding of CNN, and it's my impression that Bill Gates sort of combined his training with his main work.
Back then, however, there was Octave Chanute, who in 1867 planned the first permanent span across the Mighty Mo. It featured a pivot draw section and was called the Hannibal (for the Hannibal & St. Joe RR).
He is described as a "self-trained civil engineer working for the railroad." In his time, dozens of bridges collapsed annually. The Hannibal stood for 5 decades. Of course, he did much else. The Wright brothers gave him credit for some of the design features of their plane. It's amazing that just 150 years ago, it was not unusual for someone without formal training in some field to excel at it.
Ann Alden
February 3, 2001 - 12:51 pm
I think someone here might enjoy this site.
Photographic History of CPRR There are quite a number of links on this site about the history of the building of the transcontinental railroad. I feel like I hit the "mother lode"!
Ann Alden
February 3, 2001 - 01:06 pm
Don't miss these photos of the tunnels and the walls that the Chinese built.
Tunnel and wall photos
Ann Alden
February 3, 2001 - 01:12 pm
And, a very simple explanation with drawings of how steam engines work!
How Steam Engines WorkNow, most of you may already know this, but quite frankly, I needed a reminder which is geared to high schoolers since that's the last time I heard it, in a Physics class.
rambler
February 3, 2001 - 02:37 pm
Ann: Those were wonderful clickables that you provided! In its own way, in its own time, the project was a challenge similar to putting a man on the moon. But it took much more back-breaking labor!
Now I have to get back to re-reading the rest of chaps. 1 and 2.
Harold Arnold
February 3, 2001 - 03:56 pm
Ginny asked in Message #107 if railroad pictures are in my family achieve. No not really. There is a picture of the excavation for what was called the “Nolan Street Subway.” This was the vehicle/pedestrian underpass permitting traffic to pass under the SP tract on the east side of San Antonio the frequently blocked traffic to and from the business city. Also there are a couple of pictures taken from a train window in Chicago. There is nothing of real Railroad interest.
Ginny, Message #108: I wouldn’t be too critical of Ambrose for not going into the detailed economics associated with the alternate routes. After all he was writing a popular history, not an academic text. I think this illustrates the difference between a popular history whose purpose is to be read and enjoyed as recreation by non-professional people and a definitive history text directed to the interests of professional historians. It also indicates Ambroses’ skill as a writer in knowing what to include and what to leave out of a book he was writing for a specific group of readers. It also facilitated the sale of maybe several hundred thousand or more copies instead of a few tens of thousand.
I spent this morning looking through my library for a book I read about 10 years ago. I think it was titled, “American Notes” or something like that. It was a travel book by Rudyard Kippling describing his 1880’s trip to the U.S. He arrived in San Francisco by ship from Japan. I remember it included an interesting account of the train trip to Yellowstone and Denver and east. I think this would have been the Central Pacific link described in our book. I did not find the Kippling book. It seems have dropped from the face of the earth, but I’ll go to the library and report about it later.
While looking for the Kippling book, I found another interesting book I had forgotten I had. It was a 1960 limited edition book describing the construction of the railway system in South Texas south of San Antonio. Specifically it concerned the early Corpus Christi and Rio Grande Railway that in the 1870’s built track connecting the port of Corpus Christi with Brownsville and the Rio Grand Valley, and also Corpus Christi and San Antonio.
This book included some interesting economic information. The cost of the track averaged about $7,000.00 a mile. The first locomotive was delivered by ship from Philadelphia. It arrived in Corpus in 1876 and its purchase cost was a modest $6,500.00. It is described as follows:
It was a wood burner with a quaint funnel stack with 40” drivers of Baldwin make packing approximately 150 HP. In bold white letters “Corpus Christi” was embossed on its tender.
Also the ironworks for 20 freight cars and one passenger car was delivered to Corpus by sea. It is said that on the initial run south with leading VIP passengers, the train sped along at a 20 MPH clip.
Finally I will add the following comment concerning the term "Argonaut" that was discussed in several earlier messages. During the 1940. There were 2 daily SP passenger trains (east/west and west/east total 4 trains) between New Orleans and Las Angles. These were named the "Sunset Limited" and the "Argonaut." I understand the these names were of ancient vintage with the "Sunset Limited" at any rate going back the the late 1870's. This passenger service was terminated in the late 50's or 1960's. I remember I generally took the Argonuat when I was in the navy because it departed and arived in San Antonio at a convenient afternoon time.
Ginny
February 4, 2001 - 05:30 am
Oh boy ohboy oboy, is this fun or what? Everybody has already added so much, you know what this reminds me of? It reminds me of a
real train trip, where you set out with great anticipation and as you travel you meet such interesting people and they share their own stories and reminiscences with you and their knowledge, and when you get off, you are so enriched, what FUN!
I'll be back later today with reflections on your comments, meanwhile everybody feel free to comment on everybody else's remarks, ANN, ANN, what sites!!! Has everybody looked at those? WOW! Into the heading they go this afternooon!!! You have, indeed, struck gold!
But here, my friends, I've brought you another real present, and it's something, I believe, you will not see anywhere else. These first two, do you know what they are?
Can you see a little tell-tale yellow at the corners?
Give them time to come up on your screen, go get a cuppa while you wait and drink in the delight of these three, because the first two are....are....
You tell me.
Here's where they came from: you remember I told you I took my children on the Chicago to Seattle train when they were young? Well in the window were several pieces of paper, lots of advertising brochures, and this one was just carelessly thrown in the window sill, or so I thought? And I almost threw it away, there was a lot of junk advertising?
But THIS
was the route they were intending to take, and THIS has, which you cannot see, tons and tons of tiny print telling you about EACH and every stop, the historical stuff the interesting stuff and to think I ALMOST threw it away!!
My children are adults, now, but when I went looking for train routes in America in my travel files, don't you know what I found? I was so excited about it I have crashed the computer three times just trying to get it IN here!!
BUT...IS it what we want?
Please look closely:
In this first shot, from Chicago on the far right to Denver on your left, if you look hard you can see, four dots to the right of Omaha, the words Council Bluffs? And two dots to the right of Omaha the words Missouri River?
Amtrak Route West From Chicago.
I would like for those of you who DO understand the route we're talking about in the book to affirm this IS the same route? Before I put it in the heading?
Here is Denver West, you can see the modern split: the top route to Seattle, the straight to San Francisco, and the bottom to Los Angeles:
Denver--West on Amtrak
And here, finally from Amtrak itself, is a long view of the railroads in the nation from Chicago West:
Amtrak Crosses America~! How about this this morning?
Very excited,
ginny
Ginny
February 4, 2001 - 05:43 am
As many of you who can, please tune in to the program American Experience (always well done) tomorrow night, Monday, February 5, on PBS, and view
"America's Lost Trains," the write up in the tv brochures is spectacular, the innovation did NOT stop in the 1800's!!!
ginny
Ann Alden
February 4, 2001 - 07:52 am
If you Poirot on A&E or PBS, the intro graphics include the liners from the '20's. Wonderful graphics and they look like the liners in Ginny's pics.
In reading the links that I put up, I have come across mucho info on the Chinese. Velly interesting, as Charlie Chan would say!
rambler
February 4, 2001 - 08:40 am
Lt. William T. Sherman and his men sailed from New York, around the horn, and to Monterey, Calif. It was "the only way to get any goods too large to be handled by horses and a stagecoach from the East coast to the West coast". It took 202 days and I believe the distance was 18,000 miles.
Ambrose said, "...it must be doubted that ever before had such a desirable place" (California) "been so isolated" (page 53). I quickly thought of Hawaii, but I wonder if New York to Hawaii would have been any farther? If I'm reading my atlas right, Hawaii is about 20 degrees north latitude, California about 35. If you have to go around the horn, might Hawaii even be closer to New York than California is?
rambler
February 4, 2001 - 08:57 am
Losalbern: In partial answer to your question up on top: Even
today the railroad does not go to San Francisco. The western terminus
is Oakland. Then you are bused across the bay. Very likely they used
ferry boats before the Bay bridge was built. The distance is so short
(and perhaps San Francisco real estate became so dear) that building a
railroad bridge across the bay may never have been seriously
considered. Difficult water currents may also have been a factor.
Harold Arnold
February 4, 2001 - 09:43 am
As Ambrose pointed out, the quickest pre RR passenger route to California for human passengers was by boat to Panama. crossing the 50 mile isthmus by stage or other wagon, then by boat up the other continental side. The big negative of this route choice was was the danger of disease such as yellow fever in Panama. Yet this was the choice of the frequent commuters such as politicians elected to congress and the lobbyists seeking government support of Railroad construction.
Ginny
February 5, 2001 - 06:22 am
Here is our song of the week, two in fact, I do apologize to those of you who can't hear it! I wish you could, here are the lyrics instead:
The City of New Orleans,
Good morning, America! How are you?
Say, don't you know me? I'm your native son.
I'm the train they call the City of New Orleans,
And I'll be gone 500 miles when the day is done!
City of New Orleans Chorus with Words Full song with banjo and choo choo sounds, no words Information on the REAL City of New Orleans from Amtrak It's amazing how many songs there are about the romance of the rails. Just from reading this far in this book and seeing the routes above I have decided to take the train from Chicago to our Bookfest in SanFrancisco in 2002 and anybody who wants to, come on along! All aboard!!!
More on your comments, see below....
ginny
Henry Misbach
February 5, 2001 - 08:30 am
Ginny: You may already have looked it up, but I think you'll find Jason and the Argonauts were looking for the Golden Fleece. Ambrose's image is all the more apt, since gold was the draw to San Francisco. If you've been to the top of the Mark in San Francisco, it's fun to read about its namesake's exploits.
Now, you knew that if it was something from the 14th century, Lynn White must have something to do with it. You're right. Check out his neat little essay, "The legacy of the Middle Ages in the American Wild West," in Speculum XL (1965), 191-202. He says a Ms illumination of the 14th century shows the kind of strap suspension that James Gould put on the stagecoaches he built for the Butterfield Overland Mail. Of course, we already found out the Romans exhibit remarkably primitive vehicular design in comparison with their roads.
rambler
February 5, 2001 - 10:01 am
With tonight's PBS special in mind, I'll mention this. Around the late '30s, early '40s, there were three streamliners that raced from where we lived (Minneapolis) to Chicago: the Milwaukee Road's "Hiawatha", the Burlington's "Zephyr", and the Chicago and Northwestern's "400" (so named because it supposedly covered the distance in 400 minutes).
At that time, well before the interstates, driving from Minneapolis to Chicago was miserable: Lots of Wisconsin hills where you couldn't see ahead well enough to pass slow-poke drivers, scads of Wisconsin small towns where the U.S. highways invariably ran slowly down the main street of each town, where local merchants surely hoped you would stop and spend money. No wonder that most people, even those who owned a car, chose to travel by streamliner!
Then, alas, came the interstates. In Congress, Senators from every state, and representatives from most districts, had vocal constituents who had a serious financial interest in building the interstates. Road builders in every state. Auto manufacturers and dealers in every state and district. Oil companies. Those who supply all the things that cars require: tires, batteries, you name it. I don't see any way the building of the interstates could have been avoided politically, though I regretted it then and I regret it now.
Ginny
February 5, 2001 - 01:59 pm
What
absolutely fascinating posts here. It's a pleasure to come in here and read your contributions, whether they're of love of trains or adding information or whatever, they are all appreciated. Working this time back to front:
O, Henry, if I may say so without embarrassing you, there is nobody like you, I can't believe this!
You're right. Check out his neat little essay, "The legacy of the Middle Ages in the American Wild West," in Speculum XL (1965), 191-202. He says a Ms illumination of the 14th century shows the kind of strap suspension that James Gould put on the stagecoaches he built for the Butterfield Overland Mail."
Unbelievable, is there an illustration by any chance? I will look it up, want to know what that looks like, amazing!......
Henry and Rambler, you've both identified Eisenhower and military possibilities for the Interstate Highway System, and what other interesting persepctives you add to it. I remember when it came thru Pennsylvania and we really wondered IF in fact, civilians would be allowed to ride on it at all, there was some question in the way it was presented to the people in the area if, in fact, it would be for civilians at all. I do remember it being clearly stated that in an emergency, military vehicles would have right of way. For some reason that has stuck with me, I used to worry about being ON it and an emergency arising, and being caught.
And I do remember, now that Rambler mentions it, a lot of concern over the exit ramps and the stores they bypassed! And bypass it did.
Rambler, thank you SO much for that reminder about the PBS thing tonight, for all my links, I had forgotten to set the VCR.
More.....
williewoody
February 5, 2001 - 02:05 pm
OK RAMBLER: Remember May 26, 1934? And this is no pun. That's the date that the Pioneer Zephyr (Chgo. Burlington & Quincy RR) set a record of something over 15 hours runing non stop from Denver to Chicago, a distance of around 1500 miles. I believe it averaged 77.6 miles per hour. Not like the French TGV of today or the Bullet trains in Japan, but for 1934 quite an accomplishment. The reason I mention it is that a couple of years later I had the pleasure of riding it from Chicago to Omaha. Something I'll always remember.
Ginny
February 5, 2001 - 02:09 pm
Henry, thanks for that mention of Jason and the Golden Fleece, I have this vague memory of ...and it's only that....why the others went along and I'm sure I couldn't find it if my life depended on it.
But this is a neat comparison:
Ambrose's image is all the more apt, since gold was the draw to San Francisco. Neat! Thanks! I thought he was being hokey, he wasn't!
Harold, you DIDN'T! There is a TRAIN called the Argonaut and you took it?
I remember I generally took the Argonuat when I was in the navy because it departed and arived in San Antonio at a convenient afternoon time.
Wowwwwww!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I've ridden the Zephyr that Rambler spoke of, too!!! (I've set the MIDI to play continuously, I'm getting carried away here by all the train stuff!)
Harold, am wildly interested in the Kipling, never heard of it and think it would be a wonderful companion piece, please let us know if you find it, wonderful research!!
You said,
I think this illustrates the difference between a popular history whose purpose is to be read and enjoyed as recreation by non-professional people and a definitive history text directed to the interests of professional historians.
OK, so are we saying here that we think this a popular history? I'll tell you, I have a bit of trouble with the narrative flow, myself. Am I the only one? Of course I know NOTHING of this subject, but I found in reading one of Ann's sites that it was neatly encapsulated about the four men, then I knew who they were, also it put Dodge and Judah in more perspective. I hesitate to mention this for fear it's just me?
Henry made the statement that:
It's amazing that just 150 years ago, it was not unusual for someone without formal training in some field to excel at it.
Yeah, that amazed, me, too. These guys not only had little education, they were personally convinced they could do anything. I'm just amazed at their....chutzpah.
Ted Turner (and we don't know about his education at all) and Bill Gates, I guess, would be our....closest ones today, as you all have mentioned, tho there may be people we don't know about.
More.....
Ginny
February 5, 2001 - 02:21 pm
Williewoody, wow, 77 mph is good for any train in America then OR now, tell us how it was, how it seemed. I found in those high speed trains in Europe you can't see much out of the windows unless you look just soooo, as it blurs? I wonder, too, if there's more than one Zephyr? As I know I have been on the Zephyr (don't you love those names?) but not out West?
Also you mentioned this, which I thought was great:
So I guess what Brokaw is saying , based on the vast number of people effected, the generation beginning in 1920 is the"Greatest" which I kinda like...
Have you all ever been to Disney World or the World's Fair in the 60's and have you seen the GE Carousel of Progress? They sing continually a song, "Now is the time, now is the best time, now is the best time of your life."
I often think of that. I personally think now IS the best time and I hope we ARE the best people, am not sure but I hope so. What do you all think of that or the Greatest Generation idea for people of the generation of the 20s as opposed to the turn of the century in 1900?
Ann, do ask, I'd love to know if you have some photos in your family, Harold, that was so interesting in yours about the subway thing.
Ann's links are marvelous, I got quite caught up in them last evening. The snow scraper. Donner Pass. The Chinese. The explanation of how a steam engine works (I had no idea but I understand the smokestack now whereas I didn't before). There's one photo showing a man on the front of an engine, it's somewhere around where Flanger meeets Scraper and the engine is number 4840 but I could NOT get past that photo, just sat staring at it. I may have to copy it here in the heading, it's....I don't know, it did "it" for me. Thank you SOOO much for those links, Ann , and that first one had such succinct history of the line and so many auxiliary links one could wander forever there lost.
I'm going to take the silence we're hearing about the possible route mirroring today's Amtrak Route as being we don't know YET at this point in the book, and so am going to hold those maps in readiness in case it IS the same route. Wouldn't that be exciting?
When was the famous Donner Party incident? Just reading Ann's link in 2/2000, makes me wonder how anybody NOW lives thru it, much less then.
OK have you got all the players straight or does anybody have a question about anything? Now is the time to ask, we've plenty of knowledgeable people here!
ginny
losalbern
February 5, 2001 - 02:51 pm
In response to the question of todays entrepreneurs of Crocker's ilk, I would advance the name of billionaire Phillip Anschutz. Never heard of him? Thats not surprising because he shuns publicity and never gives interviews. A list of what he owns is too length to show here but one of his preoccupations is fiber optic cable in which he is very big .
How's this for a business deal ! In 1988, he bought the Southern Pacific RR ( the successor to the Big 4's Central Pacific) paying $1.6 billion for it. Then he used the SP right-of-way to lay fiber optic cable where ever he wanted it to go. That gave him free right of way for his cable. Then in 1995, he sold SP to Union Pacific for $3.9 billion, a tidy profit for the use of their right of way. That, folks, is an entrepreneur!
losalbern
February 5, 2001 - 03:04 pm
One other thought about the rationale behind Ike and the Military wanting and pushing for the Interstate system of highways. One selling point had to do with the ability of the Military to have mobile Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles that could be quickly moved from site to site thus making it very difficult for an enemy to find them and knock them out in a first strike effort. I don't know if this ever came to pass but it probably was a deterant for the enemy to think about.
Ann, I really liked your illustration of how a steam engine workd. Thanks for doing that .
rambler
February 5, 2001 - 03:13 pm
The train song, "The City of New Orleans", was not written by Arlo Guthrie, who (among others) popularized it, as some over in an SN musical site once assumed before I wised them up. It was written by "Chicago Shorty", Steve Goodman, who once worked in the post office in my home town. Many consider it the best railroad song ever written.
FaithP
February 5, 2001 - 05:39 pm
I am loving this discussion though I dont post much. The guys have such wonderful railroad stories and their font of information is really amazing. Did they all have toy trains when little (or big, for that matter.) My husband loved toy trains and played with them all the time. My son was not as interested as his dad. Faith
patwest
February 5, 2001 - 06:10 pm
We used to set our watches with the California Zephyr. It always went through Altona at 12:05 pm... That meant it was time for the men to be in from the fields at planting time... It didn't slow down for our small village and most said it went through at 85 to 95 mph.
Uncle Leonard was one the few around here who was hit by the Zephyr and survived. His truck stalled on the track and was trying to get it restarted. Today the old Zephyr run is supposed to come through Galesburg at 12:35 ... but when Alice came from Denver last week.. It was 2 hours and 15 minutes late and was 30 minutes late leaving Denver.
The run took 16 hours... mostly because the track is in such poor condition in Iowa, that the speed has to be reduced... Cost for a round-trip sleeper is $470.00.. But Alice dosen't fly.. and she had to work as soon as she returned to Denver.
So Amtrak really is no substitute for the trains they replaced.
Ginny, are you sure you want to train from Chicago to Washington?
Harold Arnold
February 5, 2001 - 08:25 pm
I just listened to the two sound strips that Ginny posted. The chorus initiated the Real Player Pro software that I generally consider the best music player software. Not this time. Some was good, but much was badly distorted. I don’t know the cause. The band version played fine This machine has a pretty good sound card and speakers with the base speaker on the floor under the desk. It had real good stereo effect. I heard it 4 times, but now I have switched to KUT, NPR, Austin for “Blue Monday.”
Ginny wrote the following:
Harold, am wildly interested in the Kipling, never heard of it and think it would be a wonderful companion piece, please let us know if you find it, wonderful research!!
I can’t imagine what happened to that book? I think I had it out last summer as I considered mentioning it on the History Book Forum. It’ll be Wednesday before I can get to a library, but I will mention it again. I think I remember Kippling mentioning something about the trip through the mountains with perhaps a comment on the state of the track. Also he may have said something of the tunnels..
Also:
OK, so are we saying here that we think this a popular history? I'll tell you, I have a bit of trouble with the narrative flow, myself.
By my unprofessional standard I definitely classify “Nothing Like It In the World” as popular history. Most of its readers are reading for recreation. Also I doubt you ever see a professional academic historian that turns out titles at the rate Ambrose has. Do a Barns and Noble search on his name. “Stephen Ambrose.” There are six pages each with about 20 titles that he authored, co authored, wrote an introduction or had something to do with. Many of these were produced between 1995 and 2000. He is now working on a book on the pacific war. Is it any wonder that critics can find errors that a more academic research writer would not have permitted to occur?
I think my main trouble with the Ambrose writings is a tendency to over dramatize occasional to the point of being a bit corny. As I’ve said before, for me I think he generally keeps this tendency under control in his written prose. I though it more apparent in certain oral scripts in the PBS specials. For the most part I enjoy his style.
williewoody
February 6, 2001 - 07:00 am
PAT: Answering your statement that Amtrak is not a good replacement for the old passenger trains. This is true in so far as the time schedules are concerned. However, you must keep in mind that in only one small area of the country does Amtrak OWN the tracks it operates on. In the vast majority of the country Amtrak is a captive of the Freight railroads who own the tracks. And those tracks are crowded with their freight trains. Im sure you can guess who takes precedence, and it is not Amtrak. Also, equipment wise, Amtraks super liners are far superior to the passenger equipment of the old trains. As well they should be with modern design and construction. For one thing they are quieter, especialy at night which promotes better sleeping in a compartment. No more loud clicking of the wheels on the rails. And they ride much smoother too.
You have to understand, you ride Amtrak if you have a lot of time. It should be a leisurely relaxing journey where you can sit back, enjoy the scenery, read a book,or just nap, and have a nice meal in the diner. None of the mad hustle and bustle at airports, or sitting for several hours, packed in like a sardine in an overloaded plane. I ued to enjoy taking a plane somewhere, but that was 50 years ago. Today I almost refuse to fly if there is some way to get there by train. Of course, being retired helps as time is not any great importance to me now.
Ann Alden
February 6, 2001 - 07:03 am
I find in the reading that I feel being jerked around! Come here, see this! Oh, and look over there! So many people to deal with and it doesn't ever stop but the story itself is worth reading. Whenever I feel like I need to know more, I just go to one of those links that I listed, where the history is expanded a bit.
Just listened to a story about my Morrow relatives first Christmas in Rankin, IL where the railroad that they worked for(Lake Erie and Western(later the Nickelplate), moved its roundhouse in the early 1900's. A nice descripton of how the roundhouse worked by my uncle who made this tape for me back in 1978. Sniff, sniff, too much nostalgia!! But I loved it! This man was a wonderful storyteller.
williewoody
February 6, 2001 - 07:14 am
GINNY: There is only one Zypher today as far as I know. It runs basically the same route the original ran from Chicago to Denver. Back when CB&Q was operating the Zypher, they did add several Zyphers on other routes. There was the Zypher that ran to Minneapolis, and the Nebraska Zypher and some others that I can't recall right now. None of them ,however, operated at the speeds that the original Zypher made in the 1934 run Denver to Chicago. That was a special event designed to showcase CB&Q's new streamlined train. It was non stop and operated on tracks that had been cleared of all freight traffic.
Ginny
February 6, 2001 - 07:35 am
Williewoody: thank you for that, it must have BEEN the Zephyr I took with my children!! Must have been? Left Chicago (of course not the old fast one) and went to Denver??
Ann I have your clickables now on the links html page, thank you very much, what a treasure your old tape!!
I find in the reading that I feel being jerked around! Come here, see this! Oh, and look over there! So many people to deal with and it doesn't ever stop but the story itself is worth reading
Yes, I agree with you, I, too, am flummoxed by the presentation of the characters and was STUNNED to suddenly notice the dates on the cover: 1863-1869.... You do realize, don't you all, that this book is only supposed to cover 6 years??? I didn't.
I hope you all can remember your thoughts when we come to the end. Perhaps we will have changed our minds but I would like to put some sort of composite review on the book store sites from us all. I'll sort of write it here and ask you all to correct it so that it more reflects your own consensus.
Williewoody: This just amazed me, I had no idea: In the vast majority of the country Amtrak is a captive of the Freight railroads who own the tracks. And those tracks are crowded with their freight trains.
I;m sure you can guess who takes precedence, and it is not Amtrak.
Is this why when you're on a long Amtrak journey you suddenly have to pull to a side track so the freight can roar thru? Sometimes I wonder why they don't collide, they come awfully close.
Harold, you said,
I think my main trouble with the Ambrose writings is a tendency to over dramatize occasional to the point of being a bit corny.
Noble search on his name. “Stephen Ambrose.” There are six pages each with about 20 titles that he authored, co authored, wrote an introduction or had something to do with. Many of these were produced between 1995 and 2000.
Yes, he really puts them out and his team appears to consist of mostly PhDs as well, so the research ought to be perfect, I would think.
Still that IS a lot of books at one time.
I was struck by the photos in the center of the book, just slapped in there, no particular rhyme or reason and golly, did you see that one with the indian looking over the tracks? And how about that one with the guy (another new character) standing at the very end of the tracks as they laid them, looking off into the future? Those two are going in the heading the first time my scanner decides to cooperate.
More...
losalbern
February 6, 2001 - 07:40 am
Williewoody, in an earlier post you talked about riding the Burlington Zephyr from Chicago to Omaha. I was fortunate enough to have that same experience in 1943 while on furlough and on my way home. I was impressed how the Burlington people took care of service men and managed to find a seat for them on a train that was sold out to other travelers. I was told to go to the lounge car, find a seat there and keep it for the remainder of the trip. That was impressive to a young PFC visiting Mom And Dad just before going overseas. That railroad had heart.
Harold Arnold
February 6, 2001 - 08:03 am
Amtrack my not be a good replacement for the old passenger service, but the fact is that it is the only possible replacement up to this time at any rate. Commercial travel and for that matter most leisure and vacation travel requires the maintenance of a strict time schedule. Even holiday and vacation time is most often too limited to permit the long leisurely train transits. And most importantly passenger service through most of the country is simply not economically viable except in the northeast corridor between Washington DC and Boston.
But who knows, maybe if the demand for air service continues to increase at the rate of the past several decades, the day will come again when passenger service is again economically viable in other areas.
As I said before my last train ride was from Washington, DC to New York City. Most of my early train passenger trips were during WW II, but in the early 1950's when the RR's still promoted passenger service I made several long trips. One was San Antonio to Washington DC via St Louis. It took the better part of 2 days. There was 2 nights in the roomette sleeper. Quite frankly I never slept very well in the train berths. They were just to much movements and sound.
Ginny
February 6, 2001 - 08:10 am
losalbern, did you happen to see the PBS Special last night? It showed that very Burlington Zephyr and the soldiers on it, thank you for that wonderful reminescence. It's amazing to see that on tv and turn around and hear it from those who were THERE.
Thank you also for your remarks on
Phillip Anschutz, a man I never heard of who is truly a railroad mogul, isn't he? Laid his cable and sold for a profit, so such men still exist today. Did he do the railroad any good, must have, the value went way up~! Wow. I wish I had a train!!!! We have a farm, I wish I had a TRAIN!!! Even to go two feet.
What happened to those old railroad yards? I have seen some abandoned cars out west but not here in the southeast any more? Where are all the old box cars??
How about the rest of you, did you SEE the special? I guess if you did now we know what killed the train? Henry Ford? The airplane? And the development of roads. Seems like the entire country, not just the train people, were cooking!
What did you think of the PBS show last night, if you saw it?
Harold, and those trying to hear the MIDI music? Those two versions (thank you williewoody for that information on who wrote "The City of New Orleans!") are on two different players on my computer? And I have noticed that in Real Audio, you have to sit and listen you can't be fooling with the computer or scrolling or trying to get new pages, it interrupts the music and ruins it?
On mine it just stops the song till I get thru hahahahaa but sometimes corrupts it, also in Real Audio.
Pat W, what a charming story of your experiences with the Zephyr! Did you see the PBS thing last night? There were crowds along the tracks when it went thru!!
We used to set our watches with the California Zephyr
Uncle Leonard was one the few around here who was hit by the Zephyr and survived.
Well TELL us what happened!! His truck stalled on the tracks and and and?????
Ginny, are you sure you want to train from Chicago to Washington?
Yes, Ma'am, are you kidding? After reading this book I'm going to get the biggest room I can and anybody else who wants to can come and enjoy as Williewoody said, the changing scenery. I love that trip. And I will come BACK by the Empire Builder!!! Across Montana. Save now, train later!
Also you said, mostly because the track is in such poor condition in Iowa, that the speed has to be reduced
Now this I found to be true crossing over the high parts toward the end of the journey, too, you slow down almost to a crawl, it was so hot they said the tracks had....whatever and the train had to crawl. We were totally late, but better late than dead.
Faith: THERE you are, I've been wondering where you were and I agree totally, and not only the guys but some of the gals too have really got the background information. I'm loving this, myself!! So glad to see you again.
Losalbern, I had forgotten about the missle transport and the Interstate, you are RIGHT!
I'm off to the library, the cover photo is not clear enough for me, I want to see if I can get some clearer photos of trains so you all can tell me more about this 4-4-0 stuff!
ginny
Ginny
February 6, 2001 - 08:12 am
Harold, we were posting together, will respond to yours when I get back, but the way air travel is going, it just may be that some entrepreneur could turn the rails around again, I think Amtrak is trying....when I go to do Mobile Meals later in the week will try to see if I can get a shot of that train which stops for lunch!
ginny
Henry Misbach
February 6, 2001 - 08:45 am
Thank you Ginny for the tip on the PBS broadcast, which I watched last night. I still remember that streamliner that it said was recycled for military purposes: I figure it made either two B-25's or one B-29.
It was featured in our Book of Knowledge which my Dad bought his kids
in the early '40's, and I always wondered why I'd never seen one. I may just have accepted the notion that, like much of what went on in the East, we just did't get a look at it in Kansas City.
Of course the failure of the fast train to catch on in the US was partly a function of the airlines. Surely some of you can remember a bad train you rode. If you chose badly, you paid, and you paid memorably. I tried to train from Cincinnati to Kansas City and took a pounding I'll never forget. Don't recall if it was the B&O or the NS, but it featured: for a dining car, a four seat lunch bar; at least one car without heat, and another flooded. Then, to top it off, St. Louis
had the worst railroad depot on earth: the trains must back in! Thoroughly spoiled by Kansas City's at least functional Union Station,
I was just astounded. As my Eastern pile of junk backed in, a still pretty nice MoPac pulled out to KC, the one I was supposed to be on. How dead do you reckon downtown StL was between 9 and midnight in 1962? It wasn't even laid out very well.
As for rail trips that went well, I had my choice the year I went to Galesburg for college on the "Q" and the ATSF. The Santa Fe had the smoothest route and the overall best trains. I never rode one west of Kansas City and, of course, either line had at least one "milk run" to Chicago and you had to be careful to avoid those. The Q (from CBQ) did still have vista cars. Seating in these was at no premium in the midwest, and I enjoyed them. Maybe it was a difference in car suspension, but the Q always seemed to have more rock 'n' roll while the Santa Fe was solid and smooth. By the way, the Q's yard in Galesburg gave some of the fellows in my dorm some relief from boredom one spring night when they were able to sneak over and "acquire" a working light and bell from one of the steam locomotives in mothballs over there.
Of course the time factor figures hugely in the overwhelming success of the jet airliner. But train routes became more and more, as you made your way out of the yards to open rails, almost a showcase of failed industry and business, not, as the song says,"the good side of a city." I'll never forget the first ride I took on a 707. Even a Connie was a lumbering tub compared to the acceleration gravs of a 707; and it got better in the later '60's when we got what I used to call the hot rod of the air, the 727.
Let's face it: we're all kids at heart.
Harold Arnold
February 6, 2001 - 08:47 am
In my previous messages, I did not intend the implication that Stephen Ambrose himself was not a professional historian. His claim to professional credentials is well established by his long academic record and university teaching career. My point was that based on his books that I have read, his aim seems more to appeal to the nonprofessional reader. Yes, I suppose that more factual errors are encountered than one might expect from a professional historian. But perhaps here the book is more the product of Ambrose, the professional writer, than Ambrose the professional historian. His voluminous output of the last several years is one factor that seems indicative of this to me.
losalbern
February 6, 2001 - 09:31 am
Yes Ginny, I did watch the streamliner train special and enjoyed it very much. I grabbed up an old used and reused video and recorded the program but I couldn't rewind it fast enough so that I lost about 2 minutes of the prologue. If there are some folks who missed that program and would like to view my video on their VCR, send me your slow mail address via email and I will be happy to forward it to you. My email address is berngr98@aol.com. On another note, Ginny I want you to know how much I enjoy playing the Chattenooga Choo Choo thing that you made available to us. I pull it up and play it while reading the posts. Do you know who made that rendition? Reminds me of some of my old Lenny Dee records !
Ginny
February 6, 2001 - 01:16 pm
Harold, I didn't get to finish my post to you above, and there it hangs, bare. I was trying to say I agreed with you about your assessment of Ambrose, who, despite his own impressive credentials and that of his staff, has produced a book for the popular audience, it appears to me, also, rather than the historian.
Those of you who have read historical books on the train, how do these differ from this book? I must admit I'm still struggling with the cast of characters, but, like Ann, I think the destination is worth the struggle.
Also Harold, that is a beautifully reasoned post on why trains may never regain their stronghold in America, thank you so much for that!
Henry I'm so glad you saw the PBS special. I kept thinking the whole time that stainless steel...isn't stainless steel heavy? But they kept saying it was lighter than the other trains.
I still remember that streamliner that it said was recycled for military purposes: I figure it made either two B-25's or one B-29.
Yes, I wondered before the show what they made that into in wartime, and I loved your seeing it in the Book of Knowledge! We had one, too!!! But I just got used to seeing things in it I never saw, that's magic to hear here today.
...either line had at least one "milk run" to Chicago and you had to be careful to avoid those. Ok now, this is a train that stops at every station?
I'm amazed at your comparsion of trains by the name!
Let's face it: we're all kids at heart. THAT needs to be in the heading! I sure am!
I just sat at a railroad crossing and saw a gorgeous engine blue and yellow, called a CSX, pulling a load of strange looking shortish trailers from some tractor trailer somewhere not around here. The names were Hamburg Sud and Magrsk and several of the cars had Mediterranean Shipment on them. VERY short little trailers, our normal trucks on the highway were three of them. WE have a lot of German industry here, as the huge BMW plant has brought its own subsidiaries.
losalbern, thank you so much for your offer of the video, how did you like the show, did you marvel at the crowds along side when the train came through? That was so festive and electric, I wanted to be there , too!
I'm so glad you're enjoying the Chattanooga Choo Choo MIDI, unfortunately I don't know who did it, I'm listening to The City of New Orleans as we speak AND I have fixed my player to continually play it, so last night when a commercial came on with the same song on it I thought I was going nuts!
hahahaha
More....
Ginny
February 6, 2001 - 01:31 pm
OK, train lovers, stay OUT of Barnes & Noble, I stopped by there after the library, oh do I wish I had not.
Book after book after book on trains, those big big sale books. Trains of the old west, trains trains, finally bought The Encyclopedia of Trains and Locomotives and am VERY excited about learning stuff here.
OK it was Willie or Rambler who told us what 4-4-0 meant. You would NOT believe how many different combinations of wheels there ARE? You would not. I have a picture of almost every combination you can imagine, and
some are not labelled!!! so this will allow us to really learn and know this once and for all for ourselves.
Question #1:
It does not appear in this encyclopedia of engines and trains that
not ALL trains are called by these numbers?
Do these numbers only apply to a certain era of trains?
Question #2:
Here is a 4-4-0. This train is a famous one. Can you see from the previous explanation why it is called the 4-4-0?
The 4-4-0, can you see how they got that? Question #3:
Here is another very famous train with another very famous person driving it. What would be your guess, based on the information identifying the 4-4-0, as to what this might be?
What Number Am I Called By? This is just the practice exercise, but once you get GOOD at it, there WILL be a test, I myself don't know some of those in the book!
This is fun! ginny
Ann Alden
February 6, 2001 - 01:54 pm
Hey, Ginny, would that be the"City of New Orleans" and Casey Jones, the engineer? LOL! Here is an interesting story about that crash and other pictures that ICRR put out, also, that probably isn't Casey Jones, according to this site.
Casey Jones? We watched that PBS program on the Liners and really enjoyed it. I think some of those liners must have gone to Canada as we were on one with the vista cars and its wonderful. Came straight across Canada on it.
As to the freight companies owning the track, this is true in Canada also and we sat on a side track for two of the freight trains to pass but I didn't mind.
One of the things wrong with our Amtrak is that the track is not very well maintained. Without going into this whole story, we spent a couple of hours on the east coast Amtrak in '78, wallowing along at 75MPH, SCARY!! Now, I see where they have introduced a hi-speed train somewhere along the that same corrider and I am wondering if the tracks are any better.
I think one of the wonders is the transporting of all those engines, track, other supplies around the horn. How much could one ship carry?
Ginny
February 6, 2001 - 02:19 pm
I don't see a GUESS, Mrs. Alden! hahahahaa It just so happens to be Casey Jones! (But not the City of New Orleans).
hmmmm?
ginny
Ann Alden
February 6, 2001 - 02:49 pm
Well, it had another name, the Cannonball or the 382, which do you want!
My gosh, I can listen to Willie Nelson but not the other two! Pooh!
Ann Alden
February 6, 2001 - 02:58 pm
Here's another site which is about the history of the Cannonball name.
The Cannonball
Ginny
February 6, 2001 - 03:29 pm
That's not the Cannonball, this time, let me go read your sources!!!
Shall I sing the Wabash Cannonball while I go?
g
FaithP
February 6, 2001 - 03:31 pm
I love the music...thanks Ginny. And don't test me.I had enough tests in my many forays in Schools of various sizes and shapes. I watched the pbs Special on Our Lost Trains. Thought a lot about my own train trips in the forties. And then in later years we took the kids on the Feather River Route to Nevada out of Sacramento which is gorgous. We went on the Denver Rio Grande up up up and over the rockies several times. Back and forth from Sacramento to Leadville Co.
Ambrose is a popular writer. I did not expect a history book from him. Also he had a specific goal in writing here..which he states is to examine how in the world it came to be and I think he tells that story nicely and knows anyone very interested in more facts can find all the thousands of references he had at his fingertips. Of course in a small popular narrative you can not tell the whole bloomin' story in fact I wonder if all those books Ginny found could tell the whole story. It is a magnificent undertaking. And I have read much about Chinas rail system which still is using our old coal fired steam locomotives and it is one of their biggest industries. They still are trying to catch up to what we did between 1860 and 1960. Of course it has flaws, this book but I did enjoy it and I can tell everyone was certainly stimulated by the subject. Faith
Ginny
February 6, 2001 - 03:39 pm
Ann, you had me going there for a while with the fake Cannonball and the changed number and I still am not sure what to think, but in the photo I scanned? The number 638 is very clear on the smokestack? And it's not a doctored photo as the light caused a dull place on the 3?
The caption says (and it sure looks exactly like the two photos you posted)
Casey Jones and fireman J.W.McKinnie pose with Casey's beloved XXX (hiding the numbers for those of you who want to guess) No. 638 in 1898, fresh out of the shops in Water Valley, Mississippi. the following year, Casey, while pulling the Cannonball with another Illinois Centeral locomotive, rode to his legendary doom?
You got me, I would pick that one, it's the WHEELS you're supposed to be looking at, sharp eyed Ann! hahahahaa
I dunno, that number is very clear in this photo in the book and it's HUGE??
What do you think? They better not mess with US! hahahaha
ginny
Ginny
February 6, 2001 - 03:48 pm
Good heavens, Ann, according to that second source, the REAL Cannonball WAS the City of New Orleans! My goodness, what a small world, is this not amazing?
But what do you make of this date in this photograph and the name of the train with the number clearly on it?
Gosh.
Faith, I agree, everything has sparked such interest here, I'm glad you got to see the PBS show, too.
I really have no quarrel with the theory that Ambrose is a popular writer, I think what I have been trying to communicate and apparently failing is that I'm having some difficulty asembling all the cast in some order. Maybe it will be clearer as we go along, after all, we've only looked at two chapters.
But as always, we can be divided on how we see the book, I'm enjoying it and learning a lot, and you can't say that about every book.
For next week, do you all want to try one chapter more or two????
OK, anybody want to take a chance at guessing what configuration that second, suspect engine is? hahahaha
ginny
Ginny
February 6, 2001 - 03:56 pm
See what we have learned so far? Even IF the suspect 382
does have a bell right after the smokestack and the 638 does not? Even then, if you look at the configuration?
Look at the wheels and the bells. Can anybody tell what the two are? The photos are not really clear.
I'm going to tell you all, this 4-4-0 stuff is new to me just today but I'm going to admit it gives me a terrific feeling of power. hahahaha
ginny
rambler
February 6, 2001 - 05:14 pm
I was disappointed in the PBS show. Great visuals, but a strange
"take" on the role of government in the demise of rail passenger
travel. We are repeatedly told that the Interstate Commerce
Commission refused the railroads' pleas to do things
differently.
But only in passing are we told that the airplane and
automobile were gaining popularity and that the government was
allocating truly massive amounts of money to the building of airports
and interstate highways.
Railroads did not commit suicide. They
were murdered. True, given their public-be-damned attitude
in their early years, perhaps they deserved to be
murdered.
But I don't think the show was balanced at all.
FaithP
February 6, 2001 - 10:27 pm
http://www.csrmf.org/stanford.html This will take you to the page that is very interesting and for me especially. At the bottom of the page are thumbnails of the Genoa and the Empire These are the locomotives my Great-uncles worked on Albert Seymour and James Semour.
As younger men they did all kind of wiper and oiler jobs then as time went by were apprenticed to Fireman. James went on to become Educated in civil engeneering, back east and did not return to Nevada but Albert worked on the Old 15- 2for awhile as fireman before he too went off to learn new things.
He really quit because he was building an automobile and wanted to spend all his time on it in his shop. I have traveled over the road from Sparks,and Reno to Carson City, then up to Virginia City, so many times as I lived in Reno or Carson off and on. My husband also graduated from Carson City High and he worked in the mines in Silver City and in the Empire Mine.
We lived in Reno while he attended college at Macky School of Mines before the war. Many times my uncle told his railroad stories and he was getting old so we let him. I wish I had listened more. He had a lot to tell and we were young and ignorant. I know he said he had more money than most kids as he went to work at about age 12 as a general labor for Virginia Truckee line.
These fellows were my grandmothers brothers and there were two more who worked in the Machine shops in Sparks Yard and Roundhouse. They were both master machinist which was very high on the totem pole in those days. My great grandm other was so proud that all her boys worked and earned good livings. She said the railroad always did bring her luck from the day she got on that train with her new baby and two other kids and a husband and came to Nevada in 1776. She settled in Beckworth outside of what is now Reno and Wadsworth (now Sparks) and raised her family there. Faith
rambler
February 7, 2001 - 08:59 am
I would prefer just one chapter for the week beginning tomorrow.
Joan Pearson
February 7, 2001 - 09:11 am
Just in, a week late and way behind, but puffing, chugging, choo chooing to catch up with you all! A few points on the first chapters and then ready (well, almost ready) to backtrack, read your posts, figure out the contest and then on to the next chapters...you have been busy in here this first week!!!
I am enjoying this book immensely. I thought at first it was going to be a factual account of the building of the transcontinental roalroad...as Stephen Ambrose is first and foremost, an historian. I am not at all disappointed with what I find here.
Yes, SA
is an historian and he goes far beyond the history of the railroad, putting that event into a much larger perspective...namely the Civil War, which amazingly was raging, as the railroad was being financed and built! I was not aware of the large part Lincoln played in this project!
He repeats several times that the railroad is the harbinger of the Industrial Revolution in the near future...
and on another level, he views the building of the railroad from the perspective of ancient history! Could the track have spanned rivers and mountain heights without Da Vinci's tresle bridge? (Leonardo was something else, wasn't he? Will there ever be another? Whatever he put his mind to - art, mathematics, his inventions...the submarine was his, the helicopter...on and on, including the
tresle bridge! The Renaissance Man! The adventurer! THE
ARGONAUT!!! And Ambrose writes that no progress has been made in transportation since the days of Ancient Greece or Rome ~ that George Washington could travel no faster than Julius Caesar. How's that for getting the magnitude of this undertaking into perspective?
*************************
The other supurb thing that makes this story come alive is the extensive newspaper research which colors in the text in the absence of diaries and other publications! Yes, yes, there are lots of names tossed of in these first chapters....but their roles become clearer as you go along in the book and it is easy to flip back and connect them as you go along. This was a huge undertaking, it needs a huge cast of characters. So far, the ones to really watch are Dodge, Crocker and Judah...and Lincoln of course. They have been given starring roles!
...a few more thoughts on these first chapters, and I want to read your posts too! Be right back!
Joan Pearson
February 7, 2001 - 09:44 am
Whewieeeeeeeeee! I've said it other places and I'll say it again here! It is YOU all who make these SN discussions come alive...not the serendipitous selection of the books, but what you bring to the discussions. The discussions are more often than not, better than the book! (Sorry, Mr. A. if you are looking in here!) Please keep your train stories coming! And the web sites and photos! Just great! What a trove of information!
Here's a question that I know some one of you can answer...I have counted 3 times that cowcatcher has been mentioned, and my imagination is getting the better of me. You should see what I'm picturing! Will someone describe what it really is, this thing attached to the front of the train?
Several have mentioned the folks who built the train in contention for the superlative honor, "the greatest" generation. Here's my initial thoughts on that. T. Brokaw conferred that name on the WWII generation because of the magnitude of selfless risk of life and sacrifice for the common good of the country.
I've been thinking of the dollar signs, the hope for personal gain ($$$$$$$$) that seems to be motivating all of the investors and most of the people building the rail line. Again, I've only read the first five chapters, but I'm going to guess that not many of these people who admittedly risked their lives, were doing it for the same reasons as those who worked together during WWII. Had to laugh at the men hired to build the line from the west...who walked off the job with their shovels to prospect as soon as they reached the rich hills of Nevada! I'm still with Brokaw, I think!
Something just clicked regarding the Folger...folks often come into the Folger Shakespeare Library in DC and ask if there is any connection to Folger Coffee. Do you know there is? Sort of. The coffee Folger was a distant cousin of Henry Folger who left his famous library to the country. Jim Folger went out to make his fortune in 1850 during the gold rush, not to prospect, but to provide a canteen for the prospectors. He made lots of money at this, as all the throngs of prospectors had to eat. And you must know that they simply loved his coffee!!!!!!!!! He had figured a way to roast the beans and prepackage them for the road And the rest is history!
Later! You folks are great! It is a privilege to be reading along with you!
williewoody
February 7, 2001 - 01:36 pm
ANN: let me correct a misunderstanding. Amtrak has nothing to do with the maintenance of the tracks that their trains traverse. The freight railroad companies own and maintain the tracks. That's another reason that Amtrak has trouble maintaining accurate time schedules on most of their routes.
When I have more time I will give you all a really interesting story about how the width of the tracks was set at exactly 4feet 8 and 1/2 inches.
Henry Misbach
February 7, 2001 - 02:27 pm
Harold: Odd you should mention railroad abbreviations, because I'm not completely sure where I did learn a little of that. I'm reasonably sure I picked up the "Q" in Galesburg. My roommate's Dad was an employee of the Santa Fe Railroad.
But I picked up more in my summers working at Bartlett & Co. Grain in Kansas City. One procedure I had a role in was setting up claims against the railroads for the grain they lost. We'd have inspection tickets showing the weigh-out vs the weigh-in. The cause of loss would often be a broken grain door, or just a silly piece of paper trying to be a grain door. This would be attested by government inspectors. I've often wondered how many hungry nations could be fed with all the grain spilled on our railroad right-of-ways.
I've noticed some reference to mines in relation to the railroad. Semms to me it was Lewis Mumford in his "Technics and Civilization" who makes a strong connection between mining and railroads forming what he identifies as the Palaeotechnic Age.
Ann Alden
February 7, 2001 - 02:27 pm
Yes, Willie, I do understand that Amtrak doesn't maintain the tracks that they travel on, but that doesn't change the fact that the tracks are not well taken of and we do have a few wrecks every year for that reason.
Ginny, I have checked and rechecked those sites and I still think that those names were all applied to Casey Jones's engine at one time or another. By the way, I couldn't get your clickable to work. I don't think that the Wabash Cannonball is about that particular train. Something else to search about! LOL!!
Ginny
February 7, 2001 - 02:53 pm
Welcome back, our Joan P and you are SOOO right, is this NOT the best group assembled? I'm so proud of this discussion!!
Ann, thanks for the head's up, it's a misspelling, it was spelled htnl instead of html, here's the corrected version,
Which train has the toni?.
We're preparing a great surprise for you, or I hope it will be interesting, hang on and I hope to return soon.
Rambler, I do agree, and have changed the heading accordingly, let's do just Chapter 3 for this coming week.
There are a lot of your own questions, All, still in the heading. If nobody has answered them in a while, how about tell us what YOU think the answer is?
This is great, back in a mo with hopefully a surprise, we've been working on it all day.
ginny
Ginny
February 7, 2001 - 02:53 pm
Welcome back, our Joan P and you are SOOO right, is this NOT the best group assembled? I'm so proud of this discussion!!
Ann, thanks for the head's up, it's a misspelling, it was spelled htnl instead of html, here's the corrected version,
Which train has the toni?.
We're preparing a great surprise for you, or I hope it will be interesting, hang on and I hope to return soon.
Rambler, I do agree, and have changed the heading accordingly, let's do just Chapter 3 for this coming week.
There are a lot of your own questions, All, still in the heading. If nobody has answered them in a while, how about tell us what YOU think the answer is?
This is great, back in a mo with hopefully a surprise, we've been working on it all day.
ginny
betty gregory
February 7, 2001 - 10:51 pm
Ann, that link, photographic history of CPRR, is amazing. Layers and layers of links and photos and history. I've spent hours reading and looking. Thank you!! For anyone who missed that link, it's in Ann's post #114.
Ginny
February 8, 2001 - 04:19 am
Yes, yes, Chapter 3, now THERE'S the ticket! NOW we get excitement and narrative flow, boy, was that exciting or what?
Henry how fascinating about the GRAIN spilling, that's amazing and the connection bewteen mining and the railroads, marvelous.
Joan P: Fascinating Folger information and I did notice your take on the mercenary nature of the participants here especially in Chapter 3, our merchants seemed more interested in profit than having a vision of the brave new connected empire, but theirs was essentialy, perhaps, a fiscal decision. I loved Crocker's own assessment of his motivations in this chapter, and I haven't gotten to the laying down of shovels. hahahahaah
Runing behind, Betty thank you for that mention of Ann's URLS, they ARE spectacular and they are likewise in the urls in the heading entitled Intersting Railroad History Links. Please, All, be sure I have included YOUR submissions. Should I make those links more visible somehow?
OK, Mr. Judah, am working on the heading as we speak but boy what an obsession. HIM I can understand. We here in the Books on a MUCH smaller scale have had the same obsession for going on 5 years.
How well I remember how hard it was initially to get any Search Engine to even list us, how hard Larry worked, we had to even make a Home Page for the Books separately (you can see it by clicking on my name and clicking on Home Page)....boy.
But Judah achieved a milestone: he did his homework, he went out geographically, he formed a company and sold shares, and he apparently single handedly brought about the Bill to create the Transcontinental Railroad!!!
I had some questions about this Chapter, did you? What are yours? I'm working on getting them into the heading before I have to leave today.
First off, were you shocked by the amount of right of way land the railroads were given? On both sides of the tracks? GOLLY moses. What happened if it came thru YOUR farm?
I've changed my estimation of Mr. Crocker, especially in the wake of the stuff about the toll road? What did you think of that one? Mr. Judah is now my hero.
He sussed out the backgrounds, formed the Central Pacific (it's hard to remember that the Centeral Pacific was NOT the more Central Line, that was the Union, going west TO CA but I guess you can remember it as being closer to the Union (nice little touch there Ambrose mentioning the time it was named Union Pacific) and the Central out from Sacramanto).
I find I now understand that, how about you?
But what of these merchants forming their own toll road company? Can they DOOO thet?
Back in a mo
Ginny
February 8, 2001 - 04:27 am
Faith, thank you for that marvelous link and your own family stories, can you remember any your uncle told? I would love to hear them, I expect they are not written down anywhere else?
Rambler, I appreciate your close look at the PBS special, in what way were the railroads murdered?
That's one great reason I love our Books discussions here, the point/ counterpoint we get; the benefit of so many readers.
Faith if I forget to get your url in the Railroad links HTML page above, please remind me, I think I will move it down so it's more visible.
ginny
Ginny
February 8, 2001 - 04:51 am
I think Railroad fever has got TO me, I'm so entranced with your own memories of the railroad, please do not hesitate to post them here.
This morning in the heading you will see the famous elephant quote, and some great illustrations and thoughts for your opinion?
I really must pause here and thank longsuffering Pat Westerdale for her tireless work yesterday in mounting these labelled engines for your interest, it took all day and the effort is more than worth it.
As you know, they call a lot of these engines by numbers? YOu have seen them, like 4-4-0 and 2-8-0 and we've just learned why!
You just count the wheels in each
section, sort of like taking them one platform at a time, they are spaced out in groups.
For instance in this
diagram below first there's sort of a platform in the first section with two small wheels showing on one side. Since we know that there are two small wheels on the other side (or it would fall over) that's 4 small wheels in the first secion, hence 4-.
Then there's a gap and then we have a section with two large wheels on one side (and on the other, ) making again a total of 4 large wheels in that second section, so here's the next number, 4.
So so far we have 4-4-
Then under the cab for the driver we have NO wheels and this is called 0.
So we have 4-4-0. Is that not amazing? Excuse me for my exuberance, but I did not know this. Please likewise look at the
second illustration of the 2-8-0. Is this not FUN???
Just wait till you see some of these others..... hahahaha
4-4-0
2-8-0
Loco Ginny
Ann Alden
February 8, 2001 - 06:26 am
Here is a site with much info about the message to Congress about the building of the railroad:
Jeff Davis Instructions Yes, Ginny, Mr Judah was amazingly focused. I can't believe his obsession which made him try to find a better route for the RR's. Do we have anyone in the world to compare to him today? Well, maybe. They are few and far between. We have idea men with engineers at their disposal to attempt to build what the idea men propose. But, that's just not the same. Maybe it was "in the air" of that time of our country. There was nothing we couldn't do.
Harold Arnold
February 8, 2001 - 09:14 am
Henry (reference to your message #166): I’m not sure I remember mentioning Railway abbreviations in my previous posts. Perhaps it was someone else. If your reference was to the 4-4-0 or 2-8-0 wheel configuration abbreviations, it definitely was not I, but I appreciated the explanation. Those subtle wheel differences easily pass without notice by the casual viewers of pictures.
I read the Lewis Munford, “Technics and Civilization” volumes many years ago. For the past decade they have been on a special bookshelf where I keep candidates for re-reading. I suppose I have become too enthralled with technology to get around to re-read them now, but Lewis Munford in my mind was the first to offer scholarly critique and criticism concerning the role of technology in social development in the past and future.
Yesterday I was in San Antonio and stopped at the S.A. Public Library looking for the Kipling, “American Notes” book. I discovered that this institution was no better able to find this title among its 6 floors of books as I was in my small library. It was not recorded as checked out; they simply had no idea where it was. Returning to Seguin I checked the small library here, but it is not in the catalog. I will still try to find it at one of the local Universities although my alma mater, Trinity University, is not sympathetic of exes using their library. St Mary’s and UTSA are better in that regard.
williewoody
February 8, 2001 - 10:13 am
Other than the false claims being made that the CP was perpetrating a swindle and did not plan to build beyond Dutch Flat, I have not seen wher there was any other opposition to the building of the railroad.
From another source, "What they didn't teach you about the wild west" by Mike Wright I am gleaning a few tid bits to add to the discussion. There were two specific companies who were opposed to the railroad, for quite obvious reasons. Wells Fargo who operated stage coach lines were, of course, rightfully concerned that the railroad if successful would put them out of business.
The one other company that one might not think of was the Sitka Ice Company. They were concerned that the CP would be able to ship ice from the Sierra Nevada ice fields which would be cheaper than shipping ice from Alaska where they were in the business of supplying California with ice.
betty gregory
February 8, 2001 - 10:33 am
Harold, Powells.com (also my favorite bricks and mortar bookstore) has Kipling's American Notes, used hardbacks, for $7.50, $8.50 and $10.
williewoody
February 8, 2001 - 11:15 am
Some more trivia about some locomotive wheel alignments. The Consolidation shown above is a 2-8-0 as indicated. They are sometimes referred to as "ten wheelers."
About the small wheels up front. These are the pilot wheels, or the pilot truck. Their purpose is to keep the engine on the track. Without them the engine would likely derail on curves. I really don't know why sometimes 2 wheel pilots were used and other times a 4 wheel truck was used. Maybe some of the"engineers" among us might know. Later on as the size of the locos grew it became necessary to place either a two wheel or four wheel truck under the cab.
Henry Misbach
February 8, 2001 - 02:11 pm
Harold, quite right. It was in fact Ginny's comment to which my reply was intended.
To reply to the general question raised as to Ambrose's overall purpose, he is what is usually referred to as a publicist more than a(n) historian [as you may prefer]. I have seen such work proffered as a "tenure book," but thankfully seldom.
The only kind of mistake I just cannot forgive:
(1) Author invents person who never lived.
(2) Author invents a source
The crisscrossing of events inessential to the overall narrative is not, I think, unforgivable in this kind of work. It would count for more if discovered in something on a par with David Kennedy's Freedom From Fear (which, as a volume in the Oxford History of the US should meet a higher standard). I had to chuckle, though, when the latter had to explain what Kudzu is!
As for the plethora of names, it helps if you've lived or traveled considerably in the Far Western US. I never did go see the Huntington Library in LA, but heard about it. The Huntington in Ambrose is probably the grandpa of its founder; the bucks for it came out of the railroad. And of course Stanford and Hopkins (Mark) fall into place.
As a kid, my friends and I would ride our bicycles a couple of miles to a railroad underpass, where we could see and hear an occasional steam locomotive pass through. We then classified them by the number of drive wheels. A big 10- or 12-driver made the trip worthwhile. Since the steam blasted straight up against the bridge it passed under, the roar was quite soul-satisfying.
I've been reading (more properly struggling through) a book by a mathematician and a psychologist that argues the central role of metaphor in most human thought. Ambrose may exaggerate a bit here and there, and he may slip into metaphor current today instead of in the time-frame of his book. But then, we have to let him sell it, as long as he doesn't get crazy with it. I'm still in no danger of taking accurate derivatives.
Joan Pearson
February 8, 2001 - 03:29 pm
And I remember seeing J B Grinell of the college of Grinell, too, Henry. Oh yes, there was money to be made, but men like Huntington did give back to the public, didn't they?
Am I understanding you to say that SA has made up names in this book, or simply that to make up names is the one thing that you cannot forgive. I think he has done extensive research, has inserted the building of the railroad into the framework of history, and the dialog...well, he's just trying to make it interesting, more readable, for the general reader who is looking for more than the facts. I can see Ken Burns taking hold of this book and preparing a TV special like the recent history of
Jazz, can't you?
Cowcatcher! Just as I thought!
The metal grill or frame projecting from the front of the locomotive serving to clear the track of obstructions. This contraption on the front of the train doesn't
catch the cow at all, but it does clear the track! I can see it now in the last photo in the heading. I wonder who coined the euphemism?
Cowcatcher Yes, I agree with Ginny, Judah is a zealot, and wants more than anything in his life to see this railroad accomplished. He does have his money invested, but boy, look at the money he spends on the railroad! And his wife is a saint! Anna Judah. I like the sound of that. Anna Judah! Would Ted have made it without her? Maybe. But she is definitely an asset. She packs up and moves around with him, surveying, painting, preparing exhibits and watching their money get poured into the project!
Judah....and Lincoln. They are my heroes so far.
There is mention of the "so-called Mormon War" that sent colunms of troops into Utah during 1857-58" ~ can anyone shed light on this? Salt Lake City ~ troops???
losalbern
February 8, 2001 - 04:19 pm
It bothers me somewhat that while Judah is busy taking on the entire Congress to get the funding and approval of his grandios railroad scheme, his partners, the Big 4, have plans of their own on how to get a very good return on their railroad investment and to do so rather quickly. They form their own company apparently without Judah's knowledge, to build a toll road that parallels the planned railbed. I could find no indication by Ambrose that they purchased this land so does that mean that their road would be built on the railroad right of way that they hoped Judah would managed to obtain from the government? Can any of you folks enlighten me on that premise? A couple of questions pop up here. First, assuming that Judah does get the government approval he seeks, it looks like this new toll road company is going to charge the new railroad for hauling its rails and supplies up to "construction forces working in advance of the railroad.." ( page 77). So company "A", which they own , is going to charge company "B", which they also own, for hauling their freight to the worksite. Hm.. Now, if it turns out that for some reason the railroad cant live up to its contractual timetable and fails, these folks will still have the toll road, which returned their original investment, to service the mining communities. Do I read this correctly? If so, I would say that these folks have a good understanding about hedging and the profit motive.
losalbern
February 8, 2001 - 05:39 pm
Ann, I finally got around to getting into that postings clickables and boy what a find you came up with there. Bank Night! It is really fun to poke around there and see all wintry problems those people had to deal with while tunneling through the summit. It was no piece a cake up there last year! I spent an hour there and didn't see everything so I plan on going back. Thanks loads for finding that for us.
FaithP
February 8, 2001 - 09:30 pm
Loslebern in Feb. of 1950 there was a terrific big snow storm on the summit. It was coming down and freezing so fast that no plows could keep the road open and a certain passenger train got stuck in the tunnel. It was several days before they could get out. My husband was a scout master at the time and had taken his senior scouts on a ski and snow trip to a scout camp at a spot call Sugar Bowl on the summit and they had hiked and skiid in but in the morning he and his other scout master saw they were truly snow bound. Fate would have it one of the boys got sick(later learned it was from bad water in the tank in cabin which no one boiled or purified) and my husband, a not so good skier had to go five miles back out to the highway to get assistance for his sick kids. I had totally forgotten this and now I am going to look up more about it. I will let you know. Sacramento Bee and Union had tons of stories and pictures of the "rescue of the passangers". Faith
FaithP
February 8, 2001 - 10:00 pm
Well folks this is why I love love these discussions. My memories were that the two incidents were the same winter. Wrong. The boy scout trip was in 1950 and there was a blizzard but not the one that produced the Stuck Train. so here is the url for that story and it is hair raising. I remember how frightened we were that all of those people might die. Here in Sacramento Valley it was all we talked about for days.
http://www.tahoe.com/Truckee/almanac98/snowbound.html
Ginny
February 9, 2001 - 04:26 am
Oh golly what GREAT posts and links, I've been thinking about what Losalbern said all night and have found some more information, they weren't the only people doing that toll road thing, this is a whole new avenue opening up and am so grateful for all your points, links and posts.
Please note that the heading IS changed and does have many of your queries yet unanswered?
First here today tho, some interesting information. First off here is a very slow loading but very clear graphic of what happened if the train needed to
STOP quickly!
Stop the Train! I want to get OFF! My new book (which I am going to get my money's worth out of hahahaha) explains that
Before the automatic air brake became standard, railroad brakemen scrambled across freight car roofs to apply mechanical brakes manually upon whistle-signaled commands from the engineer.
This dangerous occupation required men to be on the ladders and roofs of swaying, jerking cars, frequently in terrible conditions for extended periods of time.
Jeepers, can you
imagine? I've got a marvelous photo of the old couplers and the new.....tomorrow!!!
Willie mentions the "Consolidation," and that brings up the fact that along with the wheel configurations, these types of trains were called by other names as well.
For instance the 2-8-0 as Willie noted, were called "Consolidation-type Locomotives," in honor of the merger between the Lehigh Valley and the Lehigh & Mahanoy railroads.
Designed by Alexander Mitchell and built at the Baldwin Works in 1866, its name was applied to the wheel arrangement, and the Consolidation because the most ubiquitous steam locomotive in the United States.
In addition, the 4-4-0, likewise in the heading, was referred to as an "America-Type" Locomotive. It was the locomotive which built the American West.
First manufactured in 1837 in Philadelphia, it was widely used for both passenger and freight service, and was so common that in 1870, 85 percent of the U.S. locomotives were of that type; 20,000 were built between 1840 and 1890.
More....
Ginny
February 9, 2001 - 04:49 am
So even tho the 4-4-0, "American Type Locomotive" was the most prevalent in the U.S., American ingenuity provided for some startling contrasts and will feature a few of them here.
It's a very difficult thing to find a photo of an engine showing ALL wheels? It seems in many of them men seem to have a fetish for standing in front of the cab wheels. I wonder if this is some long lost Compulsion or Syndrome: CSS: Cab Standing Syndrome . I mean, it's not as if they are going to dwarf the train by posing next to another section! hahahaha
Anyway, still "cheating" a bit in using photos clearly labelled as to number and name in the book but am about to branch off so hone your skills while you can hahahaha on the configs of wheels while we still have them labelled.
Here is the Pacific Type Locomotive. In this one you can't see much of a gap between the front four wheels and the big wheels, you can see EVERY TYPE of style in this book.
But here, and I do like Willie's use of the word "truck" to define that axel or platform in front of the train, if you've ever had a train set, you know how that swivels, but HERE in this one there' s not too much room between the front four and the next larger group of wheels.
Pacific Type Locomotive: what configuation is it?
The first Pacific type configuration was built by the Vulcan Iron Works in Wilks-Barre , Pennsylvania in 1886. The earliest "classic" was built in 1901 by the Baldwin Works for export to New Zealand (New Zealand "Q" Class). In 1902 some were built for the Missouri Pacific and it is not know which of these two orders christened the type "Pacific."
The Prairie-Type Locomotive was developed to answer the need for more power, both in the larger boiler and as applied to the rails.
The first Prairies were built by the Baldwin Locomotive Works in 1885 and many others were built for the American Midwest, hence the name. This type never achieved wide popularity in the U.S., but was popular with the logging and branch lines. The final American Pairie was built in 1910, but the wheel arrangement remained popular on many Eastern European lines iand in Britain. No 4771 Green Arrow is preserved at the National Railway Museum, in York, England.
More....
Ginny
February 9, 2001 - 04:58 am
Ok golly I'm having triple and quadruple posts this morning, this is crazy!!!
HERE at long last IS the proper photo OF the
Prairie Type Locomotive (with a great illustration of a cowcatcher on the front)...
Can you make out the wheel configurations typical of that type of locomotive?
More....(maybe not in triplicate, but more....)
Ginny
February 9, 2001 - 05:29 am
Faith, good HEAVENS what an article I have never read such, I urge everybody to go read that, no words are adequate and the photo of the train in the snowfall is unbelievable, the rescue efforts, it gave me chills, have never read such. Thank you SOOO much for that link to that story.
Losalbern, you have put your finger on what bothered me about that toll road (besides the fact they did it behind Judah's back):
I could find no indication by Ambrose that they purchased this land so does that mean that their road would be built on the railroad right of way that they hoped Judah would managed to obtain from the government?
Now we need some help here in understanding what went on and I found evidence of other such doings: There's an engine called "Uncle Dick," a
2-8-0 "saddle tank" engine, designed for helper service up the seitchback in Raton Pass in 1878. It was named for "Uncle Dick" Wootton, an ornery character who controlled a toll road near the pass and cooperated in the building of the tunnel that eliminate the need for his namesake locomotive.
So perhaps this was sort of a common thing, but how is that ethical if the government gives the railroad 5 MILES on each side and YOU (I guess the railroad corporation) collect toll on the road????
Joan, my old OED does not even show the word cowcatcher, maybe Maryal's new online one will! I, too, have no clue about the "so-called Mormon War," or, for that matter, what a
is!
Henry, what a hoot!
Ambrose may exaggerate a bit here and there, and he may slip into metaphor current today instead of in the time-frame of his book. But then, we have to let him sell it, as long as he doesn't get crazy with it. I'm still in no danger of taking accurate derivatives. hahahahaha
A big 10- or 12-driver made the trip worthwhile. Oh hang ON, you ain't seen nothin' yet! I do wish I could have seen such a thing, tho, in person instead of in a book.
The only kind of mistake I just cannot forgive: (1) Author invents person who never lived. (2) Author invents a source . Like that...was it the New York Times article which was made up or doctored, was quite a scandal.
Is this a good time to confess that as a child, as a volumnious reader who hated to be required to write book reports on what I thought were substandard categories when I already read the library in half, I used to....er....in a pinch....make UP a book and an author and write a review on a non existent book?
Good time to say I got an A every time?
er.....
Moving right along.....
More....
Ginny
February 9, 2001 - 05:39 am
Ambrose as a publicist, I can deal with that, he's doing a good job getting me hooked. haahahah Maybe we could hire him for our next Third Annual Books Gathering in Washington DC this coming November, to which we hope you ALL are planning to come, the group rates are unbelievable!!!
More later....
I have seen such work proffered as a "tenure book," but thankfully seldom.
Now would this be the publish or perish proof at a university that the faculty member were worthy of being given tenure? And THIS sort of thing you have seen offered?
HMMM.
Willie: how interesting your new book is on those who opposed it, I can see Wells Fargo, can see their concerns, it hits their pocketbooks, the ice people are a bit much.
Why is it whenever you try to do ANYTHING new there is always somebody who is opposed because of their own concerns. Narrow limited visions. We might still be using the pony express!!!
Harold: I am really feeling guilty at all the trouble you're having to go thru for this book, please do not put yourself out, we'll have to pay you mileage if this keeps up!
Putting the new links up in the Link Page (note flashing yellow star) in the heading.
What's a switchback?
You won't get ME near that Donner Pass in winter, 23 feet of snow, and continuing, falling at one inch per hour, 80-90 mph winds. No thanks. It's a miracle anybody ever made it thru....EVER.
ginny
Ginny
February 9, 2001 - 05:51 am
I've just gotten up the new links in the heading Interesting Railroad Links page and I must say Ann Alden's newest submission is a WOW!
Not only Jefferson Davis but early Survey Maps of the proposed routes, it's unbelievable, and on and on including the actual transmission of the moment the spike was laid, don't miss that one!!
Thank you sooo much, Ann!
ginny
patwest
February 9, 2001 - 06:10 am
Pacific Type Locomotive: what configuation is it?
4-6-2 ??
Prairie Type Locomotive
2-6-2 ??
Joan Pearson
February 9, 2001 - 08:04 am
Pat, I'll agree with you on
the Prairie Config...2-6-2, but wonder about the Pacific? I'm new to this little game and not sure what that space means between the two front pair. Are there four number configurations? If so, then instead of 4-6-2, I'll say
the Pacific config is 2-2-6-2??????????????????
Faith! The "cowcatcher" seems to have failed in that blizzard of '52! Maybe there was none by then. I can't tell from that photo. You know that cowcatcher did serve a real purpose besides slaughtering any unfortunate beasts who happened to be on the track...it served as a snow plow as well! Ingenious.
There were lots of dangers along the route then..that either caused the trains to stop suddenly (yikes, the brakeman caught between the cars in the photo provided by Ginny!)~ or put the passengers in real danger if the train had to stop for any reason!
Can you imagine the trepidation the passengers must have experienced as they boarded those trains? The snow, (did they have a supply of provisions if they became snow-bound?), the Indians ...and the "Morman War that sent columns of troops into Utah during 1857 and '58."
I've been looking for information on that "war" and so far have found only conflicting stories. I always think of Mormons as a peace-loving sort...not to be feared if stranded on a train. But the troops? I have found a series of news articles from 1838-46, which speak of the "Mormon War" in Missouri. There was a great struggle there over farm land, there was mob reaction, loss of life, human and animals, destruction of property...each side blaming the other...ending with the Mormons being expelled from Missouri, making their way west. Now we read of the troops in Utah twenty years later and it seems that things have not improved and you wouldn't want the train to leave you stranded in the middle of a conflict....
These news articles are compelling reading if you are interested:
"Mormon War" One little excerpt from the site:
MORMON WAR. -- We give a large portion of our paper to-day to the contents of an extra, issued at the request of the Governor, by the Missouri Watchman, containing the evidence on which he has ordered out the troops. We had several reports from that quarter yesterday. -- The most authentic is, that a skirmish had occurred between the Mormons and citizens near the line of Ray county, in which ten of the citizens were killed and a number taken prisoners. This is but rumor, however, and may or may not be true. There are so many reports it is almost impossible to know what to believe or what to reject. -- Missouri Republican of November 2d.
Harold Arnold
February 9, 2001 - 08:07 am
Pat: I too called the Pacific type locomotive pictured in message #186 as 4-6-2. However, the back wheels under the cab seem to be linked to the drive wheels also in a manner that might make it another smaller drive wheel. This would make it 4-8-0. I think our 4-6-2 call is the best, but that apparent drive link to the back wheel apparent in the picture raises the question in my mind. What are some other opinions on this classification?
Harold Arnold
February 9, 2001 - 08:56 am
The Mormon War: one of my 19th century family was killed in an incident arising out of the Mormon War. The particular event is sometimes called the “Mountain Meadow Massacre.” The dead included my great-great grand father’s brother. Family records from the early part of the 20th century from my great grandfather and grandmother note this individual’s cause of death as, “murdered by Mormons at Mountain Meadow.” The event remained imbedded in family tradition at least until the 1950’s. My great-grandfather, Franklin Wells was named after his dead uncle. My grand mother remembered it until the day she died in 1953 although she was born 3 decades after the event occurred.
While I have not currently reviewed the history of this event, as I remember past readings many Americans including it seems my relatives were agitated by certain practices of the Mormon religion. I think the judgment of history now is that the policy of the United States and the non-Mormon participants in the event were at least partially responsible for the deaths at Mountain Meadow.
Incidentally was there not a recent PBS special on the Mormon events during the mid-19th century. Perhaps it was a part of the Mexican War series?
williewoody
February 9, 2001 - 09:27 am
LOSALBERN: Your #181 I really don't see why the Big 4 did not include Judah in their Donner Lake Wagon Road Co. There is no indication anywhere that there was any friction between them. I think it was just good business on their part to protect their investment. Remember it was Judah who got them to invest in his Central Pacific venture in the first place. And also it was his idea to build a road along the R>R> right of way. Keep in mind there was a lot of skepticism about the venture at the time.
I see no fault in the investors wanting to make a profit. After all the entrepreneur invests money at great personal risk. This creates jobs and work, and in this case a greatly needed improvement in transportation across the continent. True these men were hughly successful, but they could have failed too. I seem to recall that in later years they were big benefactors in what they gave back to the community.
patwest
February 9, 2001 - 12:20 pm
Harold... You're probably right about the wheels under the cab... I'll have to go back and look... But One would proably have to look underneath to be sure...
An aside about The Morman War... not familiar with troops being called out... But here in our community is the story of the a group Mormons that camped for several years east of town near a branch of the Spoon River... They did a bit of farming and also planted a row of trees and when the township was platted later... the road which was laid out went on either side of the trees. The trees were not removed until the 1930's.
From here the group migrated to Navoo... where there are still a few there, whose ancestors left the church and did not follow Joseph Smith across the plains to Utah... They were burned out of Navoo by a group of vigilantes, crossing the Mississippi and heading across Missouri.
losalbern
February 9, 2001 - 03:29 pm
I dont think this question has been asked before and it kinda bugs me so here it is. Pictures of the early locomotives are really dominated by their huge funnel shaped smokestacks. There must have been a good reason for their shape and size but what the heck was it? Just a few years downstream, the funnel shaped ones are replaced by a shorter straight up and down smokestacks. There had to be a good reason for that too. Got any ideas, gang? I dont..
Harold Arnold
February 9, 2001 - 07:40 pm
Losalber: in answer to your comment concerning the shape of locomotive smoke stack, I think the shape of the stack had something to do with the fuel being burned. I think the funnel stacks were optimized for burning wood. Remember the quote in my message #118 (Allhands, J.L. "Railroads To The Rio," P20) the locomative delivered to Corpus Christi in the mid-1870's was described as "a woodburner with a quaint funnel stack....." There is a picture of this machine in the book with a massive funnel stack. Note that of the two pictures now in the heading, one has the funnel stack the other a straight pipe stack. This suggests to me they were designed for wood and coal respectively. I don't recall Ambrose discussing this detail?
seldom958
February 9, 2001 - 07:50 pm
Found this on a search engine;
British trains used coke which burns without a large number of flying embers. American railways, however had adopted the cheapest (at that time) native fuel, wood, and had to deal with embers and live sparks escaping from train smokestacks.
One angry passenger protested that not a single passenger traveling by train in the United States "has not been annoyed, and either had his flesh or clothing burnt."
An unobstructed draft was necessary for good steaming; an effective spark arrester necessarily obstructed the draft.
The answer lay in the bonnet stack with it's distinctive funnel shape, named for the wire screen or netting arched over it's top.The funnel-shaped outer casting, more than 5 feet in diameter at the top is a hopper for holding cinders.
Invented in 1831, it became one of the most distinctive features of the nineteen century American locomotive. By the 1890s they were abandoned for inside smoke box designs.
Hey losalbern, if you hadn't raised the question we never would've known. And I too often wondered the purpose of them. Thanks.
losalbern
February 9, 2001 - 10:14 pm
Wow, You folks are really quick on the draw! Two really great answers in nothing flat! Thanks guys. This afternoon I went back to Ann's posting 114 and spent still another hour perusing the Central Pacific museum data and pictures and I don't think I have even scratched the surface. Thank you Ann! One of the things I ran across that may be connected to the statement that I think Judah said about "we have drawn the elephant". Well, he may have been referring to the fact that "seeing the elephant" was the jargon of that particular time used by people who participated in the Gold Rush. I guess that their excuse for uprooting themselves and heading to California was to "see the elephant". Learn something new every day..
williewoody
February 10, 2001 - 07:00 am
LOSALBERN: I had suspected that before too long someone would be asking about the diferences in smoke stacks and I was preparing to post information as has been done about this outstanding feature. Yes the large cone shaped stack was to take care of sparks produced by burning wood for fuel. Not only were passengers burned before these stacks were devised, but big grass fires were started by passing trains in the east, and even occasionaly passenger cars caught fire. Oh for the joys of railroad travel in the early days.
Somewhere in here I read a comment or question about one of the engines with a set of wheels under the cab. These were not driving wheels. Only the large wheels in the center of the loco are drivers. The trailing small wheel sets under the cab were basically to distribute the weight of the engine as they became increasingly larger.
Joan Pearson
February 10, 2001 - 09:22 am
If you want answers, ask here! Boy are you all fast! Alright, here's one for you:
Last night I fell asleep in front of the TV. I woke up during the news and there was a report of a freight train out west that had been blown over by the wind...over on its side! A large train too! Today I searched the papers and see nothing. Did I dream this? Is it windy where you are? It is in the East. How about out west?
So there is yet another terrible thing that could derail and up-end a train...leaving passengers in the middle of nowhere!
But then I got to thinking of Losalbern's question: "Why didn't they begin that railhead in San Francisco rather than Sacramento?"
My sons just last week drove across country to San Diego and they tell wild stories of driving through dust storms so thick they couldn't see where they were going...that is in the back of my mind when I think about the train routes. Had the Southern route been the choice, then San Francisco would have been the terminus (or the starting point.) While the South wanted this route for obvious reasons, it didn't seem to be what was going to happen with the war between the states and the slavery issue.
If the northern route over the Rockies and the Sierra Nevada was chosen, the northern-most city of Sacramento would be the logical cterminus (plus the strong lobbying for Sacramento that we are seeing in this Chapter.)
But my sons' drive over the southern route got me thinking about how difficult that route would have been, even without snow. High temperatures, no air conditionning, open windows, ghastly dust storms, unhappy, unfriendly Indians...
Tough choice, but it seems clear that north was the only way to go, doesn't it?
FaithP
February 10, 2001 - 11:16 am
Theodore Judah is a real local hero in Sacramento and surrounding towns. My children attended Theodore Judah Elementary School in Fairoaks. There are lots of schoos, streets, buildings etc named for Judah and that is a certain way you know when some one is admired and yes, loved. Faith
Joan Pearson
February 10, 2001 - 12:15 pm
How about Anna Judah, Faith? She was behind him all the way! My heroes in this venture so far...Lincoln, Ted and Anna Judah...and Grenville Dodge, I think.
Henry Misbach
February 10, 2001 - 03:30 pm
The preferred western terminus of a southern route would have been LA or San Diego. San Francisco is too far north. The gradient across from approximately the Texas panhandle to San Diego is much easier than any of the routes actually taken. All you have to do, coming in from the east to San Diego, is climb the grade up from the Imperial Valley. My '55 Ford with a 4-second clutch and bad radiator did that.
If there had been air conditioning then, the southern route might have prevailed. Of course, in subsequent years, it has had plenty of traffic of all kinds.
But in the time we're discussing, gold was the major draw to the West, both near Denver and in California. All the prime movers who were not in Washington D. C. were in Sacramento, which was clearly the power and money center of California. From a purely physical point of view, the way they went is certainly arduous.
Ginny, I'd rather get your book report than a "mystery lift," a whole intro from a real book. At least you wrote it yourself. That takes imagination, what you did, and actually sounds a little like work.
I always wondered about the smokestacks, too.
williewoody
February 10, 2001 - 05:23 pm
It is indeed encouraging, as a member of the National Railway HISTORICAL Society, to see how many of you are learning about the history of our railroads, and particularly the geography of our country and what effect it had on how the railroads were developed. Stephen Ambrose's book covers the period of the greatest expansion of railroads with the long transcontinental route that linked the East with the West. When you consider how long it took to go from the east coast to the west coast by Panama or around the southern tip of South America, or even across land by whatever means, you can see what a hugh improvement this was. And also remember at the same time the telegraph was being extended to the west coast, which provided instant communication across the continent. I cannot condemn the few men who risked their capital in either venture to accomplish such a great benefit for the still young nation, which was struggling in the depth of a civil war, which could have forever destroyed any hope of the United States as a world power.
Even up to and including the period of World War II
the railroads played a hugh role in transportation in the nation. Only after the war when the government poured billions into providing the interstate system of roads to facilitate FREE transportation to the trucking industry, and built airports with tax money and provided government operation of air traffic control did the railroads suffer from discrimination. True, back in the early days they were awarded hugh grants of mostly worthless land in the west. But now I think the game is all even. They receive nothing for track maintenance, or train traffic control. But don't ever for one minute allow the government or anyone else to eliminate the railroads.
Sorry if I am editorializing here, but I feel very strongly in favor of railroads. Like everything else they are not perfect, but we could not survive as a nation without them.
betty gregory
February 10, 2001 - 07:53 pm
Joan, yep, a whole train blew over---I saw it on the news, also. It didn't register with me which state---maybe west Texas?
FaithP
February 10, 2001 - 09:23 pm
I did not hear anything about a train "blowing over". Trains do have some weird accidents though. Like getting stuck in snow tunnels etc. Still the weirdest train story I have is when the Roseville yard blew up. It was very early in the morning when a munitions train caught on fire in the Yard.!!! then the shells etc. started blowing. I was 38 miles away in City of Sacramento 1971 I think it was, and my apartment was at the top of a three story building and I had a deck up there with a french door with glass panes, out of my bedroom to the deck. I woke with glass panes blowing out of the door. I had no idea what was happening. I remember it was not a work day for me so might have been a weekend, and I dressed and drove over to Pancake House for coffee and. I heard on the car radio what was happening. The explosions were still going on. The big windows in the cafe shook and everyone ran to the back. Finally it stopped. Last year they finally found and cleaned up the last of the munitions that had blown out of the car all over the yard and ajacent land.
There was a terrible fuss when people became aware that the munitions were still in the land around there. We know some funny stuff was shipped right through our town because that train was headed out of Roseville and down to Southern CA. The fire might have happened anywhere I guess. We all were aware for a time of all hazardous stuff passing through Sacramento and dont know but what it is worse now not better. Faith
Ann Alden
February 11, 2001 - 06:31 am
Wow, Faith, that means that for the last 30 years, you were all living under the threat of the gun! Did you know it?
I am amazed at the information that is here in our lowly site about the history of trains, in general. I feel that I am getting an education just reading the posts.
You are welcome, lasel! I have such fun searching for this wonderful right here on the net. I never cease to be thrilled at the links to the world that we all have, right from our homes! Talk about fast transportaion!
I have always been interested in what we will do when we finally wake up to our need for the return of trains, streetcars and trolleys to replace the bad air made by our cars, the crowds of road raged souls, trying to get to their destination. I actually enjoyed the underground in England and the subway in New York and intend, to follow that up, with the metro in D,C. Seems like you learn some patience and planning ahead from using public transportation.
patwest
February 11, 2001 - 06:58 am
Roseville... Oh My! .. that's where Rae lives. I wonder if she knows this.
Harold Arnold
February 11, 2001 - 09:22 am
Here are some additional comment on the value of land granted to Railroads as inducement for construction. True the value of the land received by the western Railways at the time of payment was not great. That is why such large grants were required. In Texas where it was a State, not Federal matter the amount per mile of new tract was first set at 8 sections per mile (5,120 acres). When this seemed insufficient to bring the desired results the grant was doubled to 16 sections (10,240 acres). Remember also construction costs per mile was still quite cheap (Measured in thousands or ten thousands of dollars/mile. It was $7,000/mile Corpus Christi to Brownsville per Allhands,J.L. “Railroad To The Rio,” p28)
Though the value of the land at the time was very low, in most cases measured in pennies per acre, the coming of the Railroads in a few years increased its value at least to the point of break even with the construction outlay. Over time many of the western railways who held on to large quantities of their land holding realized immense profits through development of mineral and other resources in the property. Burlington Northern Railways during the last half of the 20th century is a good example. This Railway created a subsidiary to manage its land holdings. Later this company was spun off as the Burlington Resources Corp producing gas and oil from its land holdings. Union Pacific and other companies have also managed their land holdings to realize profit. Considering the time value of money and the half to three-quarters century waiting period and the immediate public benefit brought by the new rail service, the large land payments do not seem excessive. They got the job done at no taxpayer dollar outlay!
rambler
February 11, 2001 - 11:27 am
I have been Absent Without Leave for close to a week. First I had to
re-read chap. 3, then read the hundred or so delightful posts I had
missed.
Ginny asked about arrogant, insolent Southern members of
Congress. I think it's only fair that we leave Jesse Helms and Phil
Gramm (just two of many) out of our discussion. Not that Southern pols
have a monopoly on those qualities.
Ginny also asked about
switchbacks, and I didn't notice an answer. When you drive up Mount
Hood, Pike's Peak, or any other major mountain, you don't go straight
up the side; not even a Jeep (despite their ads) could do that. You
go left, right, left, right, breaking the climb into little increments
that your vehicle can handle. Railroads do the same. That's my
understanding of switchbacks.
In her #141, I believe Ginny mentioned
6 years for the railroad, start to finish. That seems to be true of
the construction period, but the planning, politicking, money-raising
began several years earlier.
I am wondering why Judah and others,
traveling to and from the east coast to California, didn't travel
overland by horse(s) rather than sail to Panama? Surely it would be
quicker. Too much desert? Too dangerous because of indians?
Why do
the Sierra Nevadas get so much attention (so far) and the Rockies so
little? Surely the Rockies were no piece of cake.
On tunnels: The
clickable in Ann's #115 is sensational. I printed out the whole 8
pages. First page shows two parallel tunnels! One for east
and one for west? Hadn't they heard of sidings, where one train can
get out of the other's way? Or couldn't they communicate well enough
to avoid head-ons?
I have other thoughts and questions, but this is
enough for now.
I just figured out the tunnel picture! It's a
stereoscope or stereopticon (or whatever they called those things we
used to look through 50 years ago)! The two pictures are identical!
It's all one tunnel! The rock formations and colors are identical in
both!
FaithP
February 11, 2001 - 11:47 am
I think it was very forward looking of the men who engineered the tracks over Donner pass to put two way tracks rather than siding in such a place where blizzards could snow a train in till spring. They knew their country well and the weather. They must surely have planned to keep the trains moving both directions with no need to communicate which they could only do through Morris code on the "Wire" any way, and it was a good thing they did it the way they did in my humble opinion. fp
rambler
February 11, 2001 - 02:13 pm
In north central Utah is a town of 2,100 named Helper, through which the Amtrak from Chicago to San Francisco now passes. The town gets its name from the "helper" engines that assisted trains in getting across the local mountain range.
The word "draw" has 29 definitions in my paperback dictionary, 26 as verbs, 3 as nouns. I suspect Judah had the first definition in mind when he said, "We have drawn the elephant. Now let us see if we can harness him": to cause to move in a particular direction by or as if by pulling.
Ginny
February 12, 2001 - 04:44 am
Jeepers, let me tell you, miss a day and you miss the world in this discussion, I knew I would be off most of yesterday so printed out your posts because I was reading if not having the actual time to respond.
Your POSTS, printed out, are as good as any book, it's a shame we can't somehow....I wish we could somehow preserve all these memories you have put here beyond the Archives. The information is wonderful....how do we compare to the B&N University Class on same, Ann? Are we holding up our own end?
Pat, Joan, and Harold, you are all correct, the
Pacific Type Locomotive is 4-6-2 and the
Prairie Type is 2-6-2, just as you surmised.
And aren't you all clever, the gap, Joan, you noted, is missing or very slight in that Prairie type , should have kept that one for the "final exam," hahaha, no, it seems to go by bunches or ....platforms or trucks the wheels are mounted on.... whether or not there's a gap.
And Harold asked the million dollar question. Even in the original HUGE photo greatly enlarged with magnification, you can't TELL about those drive bars, so Willie has told us the basic truth here: the cab wheels are just to hold the cab up and don't drive anything. Thank you for that, Willie, as we have some killers coming up and we need to know that one.
This week's train song is NOT one of the million and one historic train songs I found but one I can't get OUT of my mind, it's driving me nuts, so I thought I'd drive you nuts, too! I just clicked on it out of curiosity while copying the Orange Blossom Special for later and it's haunting me.
Have you heard this one by Johnny Cash?
(This song is a wav type song? It will take forever to load (about the time it takes you to read one of my posts. hahahaha) ....It's not an old historic ballad but it's obviously got trains at the center of it and check out the words):
Let the Train Blow the Whistle When I Go
I don't want no aggravation
When my train has left the station.
If you're there or not, I may not even know.
Have a round, and remember
Things we did that weren't so tender
Let the train blow the whistle when I go.
On my old guitar sell tickets
So someone can finally pick it,
And tell the girls down at the Ritz I said hello.
Tell the Gossipers and Liars I will see them in the Fire
Let the train blow the whistle when I go....
Henry spoke of having seen some huge trains crossing overhead as a child, wouldn't you KILL to have been there and seen that? I can see that in my mind, he spoke of big trains, here's one that boggles the mind (this is one time I'm glad for the figure of a man in here, LOOK at this giant!)
The enormous 4-14-4 of the Soviet Railway, the longest nonarticulated locomotive ever built. Unfortunately, this behemoth, which had a 33 foot wheelbase, had the habit of straightening the track on curves (!!) and was scrapped. (!!??!!) Can you imagine that?? OK, what is a "nonarticulated locomotive?"
The Coupler
A "coupler must be capable of not only pulling the next car and all the following cars, but also of pushing on a backing train, being coupled and uncoupled, and withstanding the stresses of the impacts of buffing and slack action (the tendencies of cars to bang together or jerk apart).
The infamous Link and Pin Couplers maimed many early railroaders. The brakeman's hazardous job was to guide the chain link into the slot in the adjacent car as the locomotive moved slowly. The invention of the automatic knuckle coupler made this occupational hazard a thing of the past." ( The Encyclopedia of Trains and Locomotives)
And finally before I get to everybody's remarks, here is another one for you,
"Uncle Dick," a switchback engine on the Sante Fe line Now what configuration do you think this is? (NB: there are NO hidden wheels in this one)....
This train, named for "Uncle Dick Wootton," was a switchback engine. Now that
Rambler has explained
switchbacks to us for ascending and descending sharp slopes, we can understand what a "helper" engine might do.
This engine was built in 1878 and retired in 1921. As well it has a smokestack which
may be one of the "balloon stack" types.
More.....
Ginny
February 12, 2001 - 06:14 am
Ok I have just this minute completed editing of the above post, all the links now work including the fabulous photo of a modern coupler, but looking at that drawing of old couplers gives me the chills.
If you know anything about farm equipment and I know Pat W does, you many times have to guide or back a tractor up and make a similar connection. It's killer work, too, even with something so much smaller than an engine, you have to guide the stupid thing in there and line it up and (at least the train is on a track) and then put the pin in, often times over the past 21 years I have seen some pretty serious injuries to my husband's hands, there's always blood, it would seem and he's a very careful precise man, so you can imagine what hideous result came from the picture above, it boggles the mind.
Agg look at that drawing, do you see his left hand pushing on it? aggggh
I believe my new heroes are the brakemen.
More .....
Joan Pearson
February 12, 2001 - 06:39 am
Oh Betty, thank you so much for the information about the wind-over train! I was beginning to think I had dreamed the whole thing! It was some picture, seeing all those cars on their side off the track, wasn't it? West Texas, you say? Hmmm...that means that wind sweeping over those lands would have been yet another peril along the
southern route. I wonder how many actually did/do go over like that. It is hard to imagine a heavy-weighed town freight train going over in the wind, isn't it? Makes me think of our toy train sets, the way the whole thing would go over if just one car went off the track, especially the curves! Thanks Betty!
It's hard to picture these huge engines getting blown over in the wind, isn't it? Are today's trains that much lighter? Even freight trains, or do you suppose trains have always had a problem with the wind. I tell you, after seeing that entire train over on its side, I'll choose the northern route...in the summer/spring though - when we train it to CA for our next Books gathering in 2002.
Have you all stopped by the planning discussion for Bookfest 2001 in Washington, DC in November? That one promises to be a doozy, and you are
all invited! Click here:
Bookfest2001-Washington, DC I came in to ask if any of you can come up with any names associated with the lobby for the Southern route?
Names? Oh sure, the Southern reps in Congress would object to anything that didn't bring the enormous growth potential through the southern states, but did they have anyone like a Theodore Jonah, (with his own office in Washington) so well prepared with surveys and figures? Were there stronger proponents in California for the terminus in LA or San Diego, than those powerful wealthy backer in Sacramento? And let's not forget Grenville Dodge who had Lincoln's respect...telling him during the war that the northern route was a military necessity. So was there ever really any question about the selection of the northern route? Some names, besides southern voices in Congress?
A good question, rambler...why aren't the Rockies a bigger consideration...all we hear about is the difficulty of crossing the Sierra Nevada. I guess because this was the really formidable range? There were three mentioned...where is the Wasatch Range? I thought I knew my country?
Ginny, I still can't understand how they got anyone to take the brakeman's job? Unless the gruesome accidents were just not reported!
Ginny
February 12, 2001 - 06:52 am
Joan raises there some great points, I must sheepishly admit I had to look up the location of Sacramento? I am embarrassed but with all the remarks on it in the book I thought it was near Seattle! hahahahaha
Funny thing where it IS? You have to go thru Sacaramento to GET to San Francisco, do you not? Or would you not?
Good points on all those mountain ranges, the highest peaks are in the west, tho, aren't they? Geography R Us here this morning.
Yes, I attacked family yesterday with the train blown on side question and yes indeed, gale force winds, everybody BUT me had seen it, do you think we can get in here a photo and article of same? It does make one think? It was NOT a tornado, tho they are very firm on that, just....what? 90 mph winds?
And yes, I would really love to know about the relative weight of the old trains versus the new, does anybody know that? I need to put that in the heading, you all have answered almost ALL the queries there, and I must say this is the first time I believe I have ever seen that phenomenon?
Thank you all for that. Harold, your question about the Great Eastern is not answered, could you tell us?
Joan your description of your sons's trip across the desert and accompanying lands really brought back memories. My oldest son and I did such a trip years ago and I was not prepared for desert driving and it was unreal. When you hear more from your sons please put same here. I remember signs about you must keep your headlights ON? And areas which apparently would wash in a rain it was just unreal, we went up one mountain to a famous ghost town which, like a Lucille Ball movie, had only one car track width up and a sheer face on the right, we did meet oncoming cars, never never again, never.....
NEVER.....
more.....
Ann Alden
February 12, 2001 - 06:58 am
I believe that my grandfather was a brakeman for about 8 years on the Lake Erie&Western(later the NickelplateRR). He decided to open a general merchandise store after that. Decided it was safer!
Ginny,
I believe that non-articulated means no breaks in the whole engine and it looks like that engine didn't have the wheels that are on the American trains that give it the ability to turn without the cab turning. I saw your train encyclopedia at B&N last week and had to slap my hand and not buy it! Did you see the one on stations, roundhouses, and something else? To die for!
This discussion has become the most interesting on the B&L Site except for deToque's tome!
I loved Johnny Cash's song about dying. Especially the bit about seeing the bad guys in hell! He does some good stuff!
Ginny
February 12, 2001 - 08:00 am
Thank you, JOan P, Pat W, and Harold for that fascinating look at the Mormons, in Chapter 4 we will see a very famous Mormon investing in the railroads, boggles the mind.
Harold how fascinating your own ancestor, that's just unreal, isn't it a small world, one minute the subject comes up and the next it has touched our own lives, amazing. Do you have any photos of those people? And Pat, how fascinating, the local connection!
Maryal has sent this definition of "cowcatcher" from the OED, thanks Maryal!
Cow-catcher: (U.S.)
An apparatus fixed in front of a locomotive engine, to remove straying cattle or other obstructions from the rails in front of a train.
1838 Railway Mag. Mar. 185 This machine is used..in the United States, and is termed a 'cow or horse catcher'. 1853 Rep. Comm. Patents 1852 (U.S.) I. 64 Cow-catcher. 1861 G. F. BERKELEY Sportsm. W. Prairies iv. 60 The cow-catcher is a strong iron fence, or set of bars, springing out from the engine in front of both fore wheels. 1884 Philada. Times No. 3041. 2 Cow-catchers for street cars.
Losalbern, thank you for that great question about the shape of the smokestacks, it was answered before I could even get it UP!! Wonderful!
Thank you, Harold, and Seldom958 for that great information both on what it burned and what it hoped to accomplish spark wise, and the different types. I also found a reference to "balloon" stack but no other information about that particular type?? I see you have mentioned the "bonnet" stack as well, wonder if there was a difference at all?
Also Losalbern, WELL DONE on the elephant thing being a reference to the famous and hitherto unknown expression to me of "seeing the elephant," being about the Gold Rush!
Also appreciated Rambler's (glad to see you back) take on the drawn issue I was a tad confused there thinking of "drawn and quartered," instead. hahahaahah
More... (roof leaks here this morning, new roof and having to keep interrupt here and talk to those involved in putting up same and emptying pails)
g
Ginny
February 12, 2001 - 08:11 am
Ann, how exciting about your grandfather, 8 YEARS! Hopefully he lost no fingers, are there any tales passed down you could share?
Thank you also for those nice remarks on the discussion, actually I'm amazed at it and my own new killer interest and I will kill this keyboard if it once again erases one of my posts. I need one with just typing keys!
OOO noooooo, Roundhouses? NOOOO, if I had seen that buzzard NO amount of slapping would have sufficed! hahahahah I may have to make a trip back, and wasn't there another really fine looking one, can't remember the subject, oh trains of the old west? I may have to go back to B&N I can see that, always a pleasure trip.
OH so on the nonarticulated engine, Eagle Eye Ann, then it lacks that....platform...what did Willie call it....truck...that swivels the wheels and allows it to turn? I'm assuming,....er...no, it would not be under the cab? Willie? Truck that swivels under cab as well?
Well heckers, what were they thinking of? They built an engine which could not turn! A GIANT IRON! hahahahaha
Yes, also I too am amazed at Johnny Cash, I'm not a country music fan and don't know much about him except he has a "Poutin House," but I loved that song, just love it. (By the way those of you who think you can't hear the songs, click on that one, it's a wav. file, you may be able to hear it).
This discussion is openening up a whole new MOI!
hahahahah
MORE.....
Ginny
February 12, 2001 - 09:12 am
Well just look at Rambler with his Helper engines and we have one today for people to take a shot at the configurations if they like, great minds run together!
Yes and the tunnel, that WAS smart, Faith, I agree. My goodness on the Roseville yards blowing UP! That is UNREAL and I'm glad you were not hurt, was anybody killed? They have just discovered live land mines and stuff here in Croft State Park, live munitions left over from training for WWII, big stuff in the paper about it.
Henry mentions the gold rush being near Denver and that alone gives us a pretty strong reason why they would take that route, and the strong movers and shakers in Sacramento seems to answer the San Fran / Scaramento question.
Hahahahah, Henry, "mystery lifts," sounds like movie stars hahahaaha.....you know what? I believe you are right, it may have been more work that way! hahahahahahaa
I know it was fraught with anxiety lest the teacher actually go to the library and check! hahahahaa
Willie, they now get nothing for track maintenance? Do they still own that much land on each side of the tracks? I will say that I do appreciate your passionate defense of railroading, and how delighted I am to have an member of the National Railway Historical Society among us, what all is your goal in that group?
Ann have you been on the Metro (is that what it's called, Joan P?) in DC? It's fabulous, looks like something from outer space, to me.
Rambler, do you think it was the hostility from seccession and the Civil War that prompted that remark or ....hmmmm....I agree it's not a regional affliction. hahaahaha OOPS I credited Willie with Switch backs earlier I am now looking RIGHT AT at the printed copy, and must go fix your name, the ideas come so fast in here it's hard to keep track!
OK We have on schedule Chapter 4 starting on Valentine's Day, does it suit you all to move on to Chapter 4 on Wednesday or are there more issues we need to cover in the next few days?
So what IS that configuration of "Uncle Dick," anyway???
ginny
Ginny
February 12, 2001 - 09:31 am
Again, Rambler mentioned Helper Utah quite correctly (and thank you all for using the title line it makes it so fast to go back and look stuff up), and here's what my own Amtrak little packet of information from our own journey on that line (wasn't that a THRILL and I didn't even know it) has to say about Helper, as well:
HELPER: Additional "helper" locomotives are added to freight trains (must be still going on??) to help them over the mountains, giving this railroad town the name Helper (just like Rambler said). Local coal is plentiful enough to supply the U.S. for 300 years....
I now also see the mention of DONNER LAKE, which on the map
The Route West: Donner Lake is the very last set of words (partially cut off) left from Reno.
Here is what it says about DONNER LAKE:
On the eastern end of the tunnel, to the left of the train, is Donner Lake. it was here that the Donner Party, led by George and Jacob Donner, was stranded.
These 89 Illinois settlers were en route to California when they were trapped in a snowstorm near the western shore of the lake.
After many attempts to escape, all but 47 of the pioneers died of starvation. Those who did survive had resorted to cannibalism.
So that is where the famous Donner Party WAS! To think that I went right OVER it, never knowing a thing!!!!!!!!!
Won't happen the next time!
ginny
Ginny
February 12, 2001 - 09:37 am
emmmm.....was just listening to the Johnny Cash song, is he talking about....dying...by any chance?
????
rambler
February 12, 2001 - 12:47 pm
Ginny: The Metro in D.C. is indeed excellent, but its routes,
understandably, are not designed for the convenience of tourists but
for the convenience of people who live and work in D.C. Thus, there
is no Metro station anywhere near the Lincoln or Vietnam or Korean War
memorials, none near the Jefferson or FDR memorials.
I don't think
there's bus service to those destinations either. We took taxis,
which are quite reasonable in D.C. Footweary, we even took a taxi
from the White House to our hotel, which was only four blocks
away!
The Metro does provide good service to Arlington National
Cemetery and, I think, the Smithsonian and many other tourist
attractions.
losalbern
February 12, 2001 - 12:55 pm
Definition of an nonarticulated locomotive.. Could that be an engine that forgot to say, "I think I can, I think I can, I think I can.." while chugging up a steep grade? Sorry, I couldn't resist that one.
Ann Alden
February 12, 2001 - 03:27 pm
Hahahaha, Lasel! ROFLOL!! Isn't the English language great? One word can have many meanings!
No tales, Ginny on the brakeman's job. I just discovered this fact while listening to my "Uncle Bill" tapes.
I am afraid I just spent the better part of the afternoon at B&N reading those other two books, Ginny. Saw the engine #638 that was indeed, Casey Jones' special engine for pulling freight trains. When he had to do the passenger train, he was switched to the Cannonball that crashed. I looked at the build of the engines and they are definitely similar but their numbers are different. Then, I read the history of #638. Too much info! BUUUUUUT, I fell into the Encyclopedia and couldn't remove myself so it is now residing here in the computer room. I am a sucker for special encyclopedias. I ammmmmm so weak!!
I can't find any explanation of the "articulated locomotives" but the ones that I saw pictures of didn't have those front wheel trucks either. So what does "articulated" mean. In my dictionary, meaning #12 says, to unite by a joint or joints. I was thinking of a catapillar! So, does that mean the coal car which seems to be connected to the engine by a "joint" means that the locomotive is articulated? Got me!
Harold Arnold
February 12, 2001 - 04:23 pm
Today I will say something about Chapter 3, that is the subject of this week’s discussion? I think the point in this chapter that impressed me most was the already well-perfected lobbying technique employed by petitioners to bring about legislation on an issue in which they had an interest. In this case it was Theodore Judah and his wife Anna who were the lobbyists in Washington DC for government support for the Central Pacific.
Though there is no mention in the Ambrose book of any monetary contribution to the 1956 Buchanan presidential campaign by Judah or the Central Pacific, he on his first visit to Washington in 1859 had an immediate and favorable audience with the President. Likewise Judah and has wife was well received by California Senators and representatives and other prominent Congressional leaders. Judah was actually given a room in the Capitol to set up his exhibits and displays. In Ambrose’s words,
Judah was a born genius at publicity, at pushing projects, at persuasiveness, At Anna’s suggestion, he made the room into the Pacific Railroad Museum, displaying maps, diagrams, surveys, reports, and other data, as well as her collection and paintings. He had it complete by January 14, 1860, and from then until he left for California a half a year later he was in his words, “constantly engaged in endeavoring to further the passage of a Pacific Railroad bill.”
But the budding lobbyist did not have all the answers. The tough questions pertained to the actual existence of a practical route across the Sierra Nevada peaks, he could not answer. Returning to California he began the survey that provided the answers showing a practical and technically feasible route was available. Also the Central Pacific Railroad was chartered.
By December 1861 Judah was back in Washington ready to resume his lobbying for the Pacific Railroad. He had published 1,000 copies of a detailed report showing the technical feasibility of his proposed route over the mountains. Judah resumed his lobbying of congress for approval of the legislation. He accomplished a feat any modern lobbyist would give his right arm to achieve, Judah was appointed as Secretary to the Senate Pacific Railroad Committee This gave him an official status as an officer of the senate committee working on the legislation. His essential bill had passed the House and Senate and was signed by the President July 1, 1862. this is an achievement any modern lobbyist would be proud to duplicate.
PS: I have located my copy of the Kipling, "American Notes" title. It was misfiled among my WW II books, not too far from where I originally looked for it. It is not as germane to this discussion as I thought since the Kipling visit came later than I remembered, 1889 instead of the early 1880's. Also Kipling as I said first visited San Francisco. The book gives a great description of San Francisco including his impressions of the people and particularly Chinatown. When he left Frisco he went north to the mouth of the Columbia. He took a riverboat up the Columbia. He gives a wonderful account of a Salmon canning operation on the Columbia. He then went into Canada and returning to Tacoma and took the Northern Pacific Railroad across the mountains to Montana and on to Yellowstone. This was the rail trip I remembered and I will soon (probably Wednesday) make a post that will describe the Kipling impression of the Railroad, its facilities and fellow passengers. While it was not the Central Pacific track the experience is probably pretty close to the experience of its 1870's passengers on the Judah designed Central Pacific track.
Harold Arnold
February 12, 2001 - 05:44 pm
Here are some loose end comments on recent posts.
Ginny the answer to the question on the heading: Does anyone remember the event that the Great Eastern is most remembered for today? –Harold
Actually the Great Eastern had a rather undistinguished career. It was built maybe 30 years before its time and was the prototype forerunner of the great luxury liners to come later. It was steam powered driven not only by side paddle wheels but it also had a screw propeller. There were sails just in case and it had a double Iron hull. From a financial point of view it was a great disappointment to its several owners.
Some of the highlights of its career were on its first visit to New York City where it sparked a riot over what was deemed too high a price for admission. It must have made quite an impression on the locals and it is said that the last request of a condemned criminal that a police boat was taking to his hanging, was to pass close to the ship so that he too might see its wonders. On another visit to New York City it discovered what has come to be known as the Great Eastern Rocks, a shoal on the approach leading to the harbor. It hit the rock rupturing its outer iron hull. But the inter-hull held and saved the ship, but required very costly repairs that the owners could ill afford.
But the one outstanding success of the Great Eastern and the answer to the question is that the Great Eastern was the ship that in 1866 laid the first Atlantic cable giving the old world and the new their first electronic communications link.
Ginny, there are no photos of the relative killed at Mountain Meadow. The “Pictures From our Past “album are from the Arnolds, my paternal family. The Mountain Meadow connection was the Wells my maternal grandmother’s family. There is a picture taken in 1934 of Franklin Wells (his nephew, my great grandfather), my grandmother, my mother, and me (as a 7 year old) that I have not yet converted to JPG format.
Joan Pearson
February 13, 2001 - 03:33 am
Ginny, rambler's right, there is no public transportation to the mall memorials, Metro goes to the Mall, but doesn't stop at the monuments, and it is a brisk walk between them. What many people do is to sign on for the Tourmobile for a day, and get on and off at the different memorials, including Arlington Cemetery. I am not certain if it stops at each one. Perhaps we can get our Ann to look into that for us?
Ann, I think I have an idea on the articulated locomotive and its capabilities ~ from this site:
Articulated LocomotiveTo meet the special needs of heavy freight traffic in some countries, notably the United States, greater tractive effort was obtained by using two separate engine units under a common boiler. The front engine was articulated, or hinge-connected to the frame of the rear engine, so that the very large locomotive could negotiate curves. The articulated locomotive was originally a Swiss invention, with the first built in 1888. The largest ever built was the Union Pacific's Big Boy, used in mountain freight service in the western United States. Big Boy weighed more than 600 short tons, including the tender. It could exert 135,400 pounds of tractive force and developed more than 6,000 horsepower at 70 mile/h.
This site was interesting to me
because the wheel configurations are given in
four pair configuration!!! Do you think this is because of the "articulation"?
Articulated Locomotives
Famous and Well Known Articulated Steam Locomotives
Railroad Line Wheel Arrangement Class Road Numbers Quantity
Norfolk & Western 2-6-6-4 A 1200-1242 43
Union Pacific 4-6-6-4 CSA, 4664 3800-3839, 3950-3964, 3930-3999 105
Chesapeake & Ohio 2-6-6-6 H-8 1600-1659 60
Northern Pacific 2-8-8-4 Z-5 5000-5011 12
Southern Pacific 2-8-8-4 AC-9 3800-3811 12
Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range 2-8-8-4 M-3,4 220-237 18
Baltimore & Ohio 2-8-8-4 EM-1 7600-7629 30
Southern Pacific 4-8-8-2 AC-4-12 4100-4294 195
Union Pacific 4-8-8-4 4884-1,2 4000-4024 25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harold, T. Judah is such a fascinating character in all of this...would you agree the most??? This had escaped me~"Judah was appointed as Secretary to the Senate Pacific Railroad Committee This gave him an official status as an officer of the senate committee working on the legislation."
What a lobbyist! I'd want him on my side, any day! I like to hear that he is still appreciated today...Faith's local elementary school bears his name...
Look forward to hearing of Kipling's experience to get the feel of what the first train journies must have been like! Thanks so much for all of this, Harold!
Ann Alden
February 13, 2001 - 05:53 am
Jonkie,
thank you so much for that very expansive explanation of "articulated". I was going to look it up here today but husband has decided to take the day off so I won't be able to get to the desk until later. Thank you, thank you, thank you!
Harold
I am looking forward to Kipling's journey description. It will be interesting to see what he liked and disliked about train travel in the US.
Henry Misbach
February 13, 2001 - 08:58 am
Joan, none of my comments were aimed at Ambrose, who apparently is guilty of a few minor cross-ups here and there. What I did have in mind was a whopper in "The Slave Trade," otherwise a pretty good book. Apparently, he came to a point where he had to explain what the Periplus of the Erythrean Sea was. Despite all his own well-taken admiration for the Italian role in early exploration by sea, he never went further than looking it up in a Latin dictionary (ends in -us doesn't it?) If he'd looked in an Italian dictionary, he would have found periplo, which would have given him the necessary tip: it's Greek, not Latin, and means guide. Whole expression is guide to the Red Sea--what did our fearless author do? He invented a character by name of Periplus. This happens on about page 27. Such band-aid work certainly does not inspire confidence. For me, it issues a license in perpetuity for disbelief of anything he ever writes again.
I commented on this in a review on amazon.com, but it may no longer be there.
There certainly does seem to be more to the extraordinary success of a man like Judah than what we see in print. Of course, Judah will not have advertized very widely just how he was able to do it.
As to the geography, we mustn't forget Sutter's Mill and the '49er gold rush. An 1849 newspaper cartoon in the East depicts a man riding something labeled "The Rocket Line," that resembles nothing so much than a 20th century rocket! Where people settled, even in rather small pockets across the northern route, there was money to be made.
Joan Pearson
February 13, 2001 - 09:55 am
HAHAHA!
Henry! I think that Mr. Ambrose should use his mouse instead of his dictionary for his research....
But these old terms have the habit of evolving from their original translation points, so that you too might be surprised at what my mouse just pointed out...
Periplus of E... I must put this most interesting discussion aside for today!!!!!!!!!!!
rambler
February 13, 2001 - 11:31 am
This is off-topic, so I will try to be brief. Here's a portion of a
letter-to-the-editor from the Feb. 12 Time mag.:
"...you left out
the most important step that would make the skies friendlier and ease
the congestion: constructing high-speed rail systems to serve the
needs currently met by short airline flights of only a few hundred
miles. We don't need to build more airports and add runways. A short
trip between urban centers (say, Chicago and Detroit) on high-speed
rail would be as fast as or faster than a short-haul plane flight.
Let's put our tax money into a transportation system that would be
faster, more efficient, better for the environment and less affected
by the weather than airline travel."
As a Chicagoan, I can attest
that other rail routes may be worth upgrading: Chicago to St. Louis,
Chicago to Indianapolis. I think Chicago to Milwaukee already has
high speed rail service. (The distance is only 90 miles.) It can take
close to an hour just to get from downtown Chicago to O'Hare airport
on the el(evated)/subway, longer sometimes by taxi.
Ann Alden
February 14, 2001 - 07:29 am
Happy Valentine's Day, Everyone!!Rambler, what a unique idea! Trains to large airports! LOL! It will happen but probably not in my lifetime! Amtrak has just initiated a high speed train from Boston to New York, I believe. What a treat! In Atlanta, one can travel from any station that Marta serves to the Airport. It is very popular as it saves parking fees when you are going on a long trip. They can be very steep. In Chicago, this can also be accomplished and I believe that Robby did that last year when we went to Chicago with the Seniornet group. I am not sure of the Metro in DC or the subway in NYC.
I have just started on the 4th chapter but will get back here sometime tomorrow. Husband Ralph has taken 4 days off from work so he can finish his remodeling of the basement. He's the White Tornado!! I hate to think of what he could do if he were a well man! Tee Hee!!
williewoody
February 14, 2001 - 09:07 am
Have been off for at least 4 days as I had phone line problems. and may still have them??? Someone asked about the NRHS (National Railway Historical Society) a while back. The NRHS is a non profit organization founded in 1935. It's purpose is to preserve railroad history and railroad equipment, and act as an educational institution . The Society has approx. 18,000 members and has over 170 chapters throughout the country. The National Headquarters is in Philadelphia. Membership can be obtained through the local chapters, or an associate membership is available through the National headquarters. If anyone has any questions I will be pleased to answer. I have been a member for 12 years.
Harold Arnold
February 14, 2001 - 10:18 am
Here are a few short vignettes picturing some of Kipling’s 1889 experience and observations as a passenger on the North Pacific Railroad between Tacoma Washington and Livingston Montana. .
Eastward then to Montana I took my way for the Yellowstone National Park, called in the guide-books “Wonderland.” But the real Wonderland began on the train. We were a merry crew. One gentleman announced his intention of paying no fare and grappled the conductor, who neatly cross-buttocked him trough a double plate-glass window. His head was cut open in four or five places. A doctor on the train hastily stitched up the biggest gash and he was dropped at a wayside station, spurting blood at every hair- a scarlet and ghastly site. The conductor guessed that he would die, and volunteered the information that there was no profit in monkeyng with the North Pacific Railway. (Chapter VII, Pages 76-77).
We stopped at Pasco Junction, and a man told me that it was the Queen City of the Prairie. I wish Americans didn’t tell such useless lies. I counted fourteen or fifteen frame houses and a portion of a road that showed like a bruise on the untouched surface of the blue sage, running away and away up to the setting sun. (Chapter VII, Page 77).
There was a row in our car toward morning, a man having managed to get querulously drunk in the night. Up rose a Cornishman with a red head full of strategy, and strapped the obstreperous one smiling largely as he did so, and a delicate little woman in a far bunk watched the fray and called the drunken man a “dammed hog,” which he certainly was, though she needn’t have put it quite so coarsely. (Chapter VII, Page 77).
Later we laid our bones down to crossing the Rockies. An American train can climb up the side of a house if need be, but it is not pleasant to sit in it. We clomb till we struck violent cold and an Indian reservation. And the noble savage came to look at us. He was a Flathead and unlovely. Most Americans are charmingly frank about the Indian. “Let us get rid of him as soon as possible,” they say. “We have no use for him.” Some of the men I meet have the notion that we in India are exterminating the native in the same fashion, and I have been asked to fix a date for the final extinguishments of the Arian. I answer that it will be a long business. (Chapter VII, Pages 77 – 78)
But this is beside the manner, which is the Stampede Tunnel- our actual point of crossing the Rockies. Thank Heaven, I need never take that tunnel again! It is about two miles long, and in effect is nothing more than a gallery of a mine shored with timber and lighted with electric lamps. Black darkness would be preferable, for the lamps just reveal the rough cutting of the rocks, and that is very rough indeed. The train crawls through, brakes down, and you can hear the water and little bits of stone falling on the roof of the car. Then you pray, pray fervently, and the air gets stiller, and you dare not take your unwilling eyes off the timber shoring, lest a prop should fall for lack of your moral support. (Chapter VII, Page 78).
I was listening to yarns in the smoking compartment of the Pullman, all the way to Helena, and with very few exceptions each had for its point, violent, brutal, and ruffianly murder- murder by fraud and the craft of the savage- murder unavenged by the law, or at the most by an outbreak of fresh lawlessness. ……….. One man in particular distinguished himself by holding up to admiration the exploits of some cowboys of his acquaintance, and their skill in the use of the revolver. ……….. Each tale of horror wound up with “and that sort of man he was,” as who should say: “Go and do likewise.” Remember that the shootings, the cuttings, and the stabbings were not the outcome of any species of legitimate warfare; the heroes were not forced to fight for their lives. Far from it. The brawls were bred by liquor in which they assisted- in saloons and gambling-hells they were wont to “pull their guns” on a man, and in the vast majority of cases without provocation. The tales sickened me, but taught one thing. A man who carries a pistol may be put down as a coward- a person to be shut out from every decent mess and club, and gathering of civilized folks. There is neither chivalry nor romance in the weapon, for all that American authors have seen fit to write. I would I could make you understand the full measure of contempt which certain aspects of Western life have inspired me. (Chapter VII, Pages 78 – 79)
Wow, how do you like those observations? Kipling changed trains at Livingston Montana for Yellowstone. He then continued on to Denver, Omaha, Chicago, Buffalo and Boston before leaving the U.S. from the east bound for England. The passages I quoted above seem to reflect the following comment that the editor included on the dust cover of my book:
One contemporary reviewer claimed that Kipling arrived in San Francisco equipped with keen powers of observation, numerous clever and original tricks of expression and a genuine prejudice against anything American.
What do you think? Would you (Ladies, and men) feel comfortable traveling that train?
rambler
February 14, 2001 - 11:04 am
Ann: On the el/subway that goes from Chicago O'Hare to downtown, you see lots of business types with luggage, lots of flight attendants and cockpit personnel. They know it's the only way to fly!
When we arrive at O'Hare, we get on the el and ride to the first stop. It's nearer our home and there's always a lineup of taxis. At O'Hare, you may wait a long time for a suburban taxi to arrive.
betty gregory
February 14, 2001 - 03:44 pm
Extraordinary quotes from Kipling, Harold. More, more....please.
Betty
FaithP
February 14, 2001 - 06:12 pm
How did I miss that Kipling book. I don't remember any travel books he wrote. Now i WILL GO LOOK.Thank you so much Harold for the quotes and you have a great sense of humour to pick those I do so love that lady that was so unladylike. Great stuff. Americans as liars? Hah, when ever he wrote this he must have been influanced by Twain or is it Visa Versa. Faith
Harold Arnold
February 14, 2001 - 07:26 pm
Faith: I think Kiping met Mark Twain on this trip, and also perhaps Bret Hart. Also at the time of the trip to the U.S he was still quite young, about 23. Yet he was already recognized for his poetry and short stories. I sort of enjoyed his great ability as a wordsmith and personally was not too offended at his obvious prejudice against some of our sacred cow institutions.
Henry Misbach
February 15, 2001 - 08:44 am
Joan, it was not Ambrose who committed the astounding Periplus boner. It was the author of "The Slave Trade," whose name momentarily escaped me last posting. Seems to me his name is Norman Thomas. I mentioned it to explain exactly the kind of error (if it may be called that) I had in mind.
Ann Alden
February 15, 2001 - 10:36 am
Willie, thanks for the info on the NRHS, I have ridden several of the restored trains, here and there. One in NY and another in Tennesee.
Wow, Kipling just told it like it was. The ruffians who rode the trains seemed to be quite articulate. I liked his description of the his fellow passengers and hope to find this book for a read. Different strokes for different folks!
I read the 4th chapter last night and found it to be very revealing when it came to the first trust in American. Just the beginning, wasn't it?
Ginny
February 15, 2001 - 01:11 pm
Wow, I think we need to read that Kipling, don't you all? Have you ever, I loved it, thank you sooo much, Harold and when you have time I'd like to hear more. I want that book. I think we should read that book, I'll go look it up on B&N on our Bookstore and hopefully there's a reprint.
What a wild and wooly place the old west was, do you think he exaggerated at all?
I loved it, just loved it. Thank you so much!
Thank you so much Joan P for that fascinating explanation of articulated engines. Who knew? BIG BOY, you say? I have two photographs of Big Boy and BOY howdy was he that. He's so big you can't get a good photo of him:
Big Boy was one of the world's largest conventional steam locomotives. 25 of these articulated monsters were buillt by the American Locomotives Works between 1941 and 1944 for the Union Pacific Railroad.
The Union Pacific was (and is) fond of oversize locomotives.
The Big Boys had a 4-8-8-4 wheel arrangement, and they could run at 80 mph. The Big Boy shown is No. 4019, preserved at the National Railroad Museum in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
OK, now in Joan's information it's TWO engines under one hood? So the first engine has a 4-8 configuration and the second has an 8-4? I mean that's a lot of horsepower. The article says that it weighed 1,120,000 pounds including tender, and generated 7,000 horsepower at 300 lbs of steam pressure. They had to build the world's largest turntables in Wyoming and Utah to handle them.
Well now that we know what articulated means, and we can read here in Joan 's informatin that it was
two separate engine units under a common boiler. The front engine was articulated, or hinge-connected to the frame of the rear engine, so that the very large locomotive could negotiate curves.
Ok when you LOOK at BIG Boy you can see the difference even in the colors of the metal, I can't see the hinges? But then would non arcitulated mean there are no hinges and they didn't move even a little bit, like that big Russian thing which straightened curves?
Maybe I can blow up a better photo of a Big Boy.
What can NON articulated mean?
Willie, as a representative of the National Railroad Historical Society I fling us at your feet? Can you find out??
Ann, I KNEW you couldn't resist if you saw that book! hahahaha Send the White Tornado over here, I need him badly my house looks like a tornado hit it!
Look inside the back cover, does that not just KILL you , that photo? It's too big to put in here, but I may try!
I need to read that Kipling, I agree, Betty and Ann and Faith, MORE!
Losalbern, hahahahahaa, yes, I agree, I fink I an, I fink I am (non articulated...) hahahahaha...
sorry it's been a long day.
Yes, and as Harold noted last week was Chapter 3; this week we will be looking at Chapter 4, you can always (hahaha) tell by looking in the heading and as soon as I get my act in gear Chapter 4 issues will appear there as well!!!
I agree, Judah was some lobbyist and perhaps Henry's soupcon of wonder as to how he accomplished all that is appropriate. We'll never know, I guess? I wish we had him in the Books! Well we've got Pearson, she managed to get Thomas Hoving and Studs Terkel, that's pretty impressive.
Before I move on, here's today's Mystery Photo:
What IS this, train buffs? It is on the title page of my book with no explanation? What are we looking at here?
More....
Ginny
February 15, 2001 - 01:38 pm
Harold asked if we'd be comfortable riding that train? I would not. I bet I would have felt just the same, we really must read this book, how do the rest of you feel?
Harold thank you for that explanation of the Great Eastern, that WAS a momentous occasion, I'm amazed that the poor ship seemed doomed from the start tho, with such auspicious planning and all?
Rambler, thank you for that letter to Time Magazine; it's good to see people thinking that way, I agree, actually, if the rails could be made safe. Thanks also for that description of the Metro in DC, the few times I have been in it were adventures, it should be SEEN anyway, I think.
Our Chapter 4 today, soon to be in the heading, was, to me, a killer chapter. Here we have the other cast of characters and memorable lines like "the only white suit west of the Mississippi," (page 140) and
I thought the perfection of rapid transit had been reached. We traveled at least eighteen miles an hour when at full speed, and mde the whole distance averaging as much as twelve miles an hour. This seemed like annihilating space.--Grant
Is that GENERAL Grant?
How fast does a horse run? I thought a horse ran 35 mph. Why would 12 mph be such a revelation?
I'm putting some of these in the heading but this definitely non HISTORY major is going to need LOTS of help from you all, this chapter killed me.
Were you surprised at General Dodge's history? His many refusals to join up with the railroad? Lincoln's continuing push for the railroads? Brigham Young's purchase?
How about the friction between Dey and Durant: "It is like dancing with a whirlwind to have anything to do with him."---Dey
How about this setting of the gauge of the track?
"On November 4, 1864 Linclon approved the first hundred miles of the permanent location of the tracks...as directed by the bill, he set the gauge at four feet eight and a half inches, the so-called 'standard gauge,' urged on him by Eastern railroaders."
I know on another site the reasons for that size are sparking a huge debate, do you have any information as to why those tracks are set that width?
What about Dodge and the peep hole in the log? Are such revelations fact, do you think or legends?
This chapter gives the official starting point in the East: Omaha City, and the official starting point in the West: Sacramento, so we finally have our starting points.
Did you understand the Credit Mobilier arrangements?
Is this the chapter where Sherman tells somebody (I can't find it) that he may destroy all of Georgia to build a bridge? What did you think of that statement?
ginny
Ann Alden
February 15, 2001 - 02:28 pm
Yes, Ginny, I believe Grant was talking to Dodge. Do you think that he meant you can use up all the trees to build that bridge? There were quite a lot of trees in that area of Georgia, around Roswell. Wasn't Dodge a persistant and admirable man? What a patriot!
williewoody
September 14, 2001 - 08:28 am
QUESTION ANSWERING TIME: 1. Non articulated is just what it says. The engine is not hinged. The Union Pacific still operates a "BIG BOY" It is based at Cheyenne Wyoming and pulls UP's special excursion train just about everywhere west of the Mississippi River. The NRHS Chapter I belong to sponsored several weekend excursions several years ago. Later on I will relate a funny story about one of those trips.
2.Now that you are asking about the gauge of the track, I guess I am going to have to tell how this figure of four foot eight and one half inches came about. It is quite a long story so I will have to arrange the time to relate it.
3. While it may be true a horse can run 35 miles an hour, I don't know but it sounds logical. He cannot run at that speed all day, which is why the locomotive could always win a race with a horse over a long distance.
rambler
February 15, 2001 - 03:11 pm
I understand why railroad folk would push the northern trans. railroad
during the Civil War. But why would national politicians like Lincoln
push it? Aren't they busy enough with the war? Maybe the answer is
along these lines: If we (North) lose the war (which surely seemed
likely before Gettysburg), we'll still have the
richest part of the continent, New York to Omaha to California. The
south will have its independence, its cotton, tobacco, and slavery.
Was that the thinking of Lincoln and other northerners?
losalbern
February 15, 2001 - 04:47 pm
The Mystery picture: It looks to me to be a picture of the engineer's controls inside a locomotive cab. The railroad track guage: It would seem reasonable to me that the eastern railroads had already laid their track at what was called the "Standard Gauge" and it would be to their advantage to have all future track the same width so that their trains could roll on anyone's rails; as opposed to having to have to contend with a different size guage that would preclude that. However I would defer to Williewoody's more precise explanation as to how that Standard Guage came about. I really enjoy these nomenclature discussions.
losalbern
February 15, 2001 - 05:19 pm
How interesting to learn that Mr Kipling was so critical of his train travel experiences in "The Wild West." His fascination with India did not seem to tarnish a comparison with that nation's train habits with ours. I can recall seeing pictures of trains in India filled to capacity inside the passenger car, with the overflow hanging on for dear life from every window frame on the outside of the car and even jammed up on the roof! And we Americans are uncouth? As for demeaning OUR Indian, well!! Still want to read his book, ladies? (:>} (grin)
betty gregory
February 15, 2001 - 07:23 pm
The mystery picture? That's easy. That's my old revved up Camaro, 8 cyl.
williewoody
February 16, 2001 - 07:32 am
IMPACT OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE ON SPACE SHUTTLE DESIGN
Sounds like it doesn't belong in this discussion.But wait and see. I can't vouch for what follows as being 100 per cent true, but I suspect some of it may be. Anyway it makes for a good story.
The US standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet 8 1/2 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number. Why was that gauge used? Because that's the way they built the railroads in England, and the English expatriats built the US railroads.
So why did the English build them like that? Because the first English railroads were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used.
Why did they use that gauge then? Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they used for building wagons., which used that wheel spacing.
OK! Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing? Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the long distance roads in England, because that's the spacing of the wheel ruts.
So who built those old rutted roads? The first long distance roads in Europe and England were built by the Romans for their legions. The roads have been used ever since. And the ruts? Roman war chariots made the initial ruts., which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels
and wagons.Since the chariots were made by Rome they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing. Thus we have the answer to the original question. The US standard railroad gauge of 4 feet 8 1/2 inches derives from the original specification for a Roman chariot. And the Roman war chariots were made just wide enough to accomodate the rear end of two war horses.
And now the twist to the story.....
When we see a space shuttle sitting on it's launch pad, there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters or SRB's. Thiokol Company makes the SRB's at their factory in Utah. The engineers who designed the boosters would have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRB had to be shipped by railroad from the factory to the launch site. The railroad line from the factory had to run through tunnels in the mountains. The SRB had to fit through the tunnels. The tunnels are slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track is about as wide as two horses behinds.
So the major design feature of what is arguably the world's most advanced transportation system was determined by the width of two horses rear ends.
Think about it! We haven't really advanced much in transportation design since the days of Imperial Rome.
So now you know why the width of the track is exactly 4 feet 8 1/2 inches. Incidentally, the builders of the Eastern Railroads prevailed on the UP and CP to use the same"Standard Spacing" . There are other gauges ie. a 3 foot gauge used mostly on short lines in mountainous area. An example would be the Durango and Silverton , and the Cumbres & Toltec tourist roads in Colorado and New Mexico. There are others in the East. These are referred to as "Narrow " gauge railroads.
Harold Arnold
February 16, 2001 - 07:39 am
Some of you have indicated an interest in reading the Kipling, "American Notes" title. There does appear to be one edition currently available in the B&N catalog . All other editions are marked out of print. The following is a link direct to the catalog entry for the available edition.
Kipling, American Notes Note Though I accessed this link through the Seniors net book store, I'm not sure a purchse through this link will get Seniorsnet credit. Perhaps to be sure you should go to B&N through the bookstore link, Make a search on the title, "American Notes" or the author, Kipling. In either case you will have to scroll through many pages of titles before coming to the one that is available.
Note also that this edition seems bound with another Kipling title, "Pluck of Pook's Hill," whatever that might be. I note that my copy was published by the University of Oklahoma Press,1981, I'll bet it is still available direct from the publisher as they rearly allow their popular titles to go out of print.
Ginny
February 16, 2001 - 08:50 am
Harold THANK YOU for that! And Harold is 100 percent right on the B&N stuff.
You may not know that SeniorNet's own Bookstore, which is found in a link at the top of every page under the logo, IS a B&N affiliate, and you may not realize that THAT PARTICULAR gateway gives SeniorNet 7 % of every book sold?
Look at this, you may not have seen it?
Don't know if those of you who like Amazon have tried our own B&N SN Bookstore? I've done a little cost comparison for you today, and invite you to look at this?
The Booksellers at Barnes & Noble.com-
**************************************************************** Shipping: Your order will ship via Standard Ground. (To estimate arrival, please add 3-6 business days for shipping to item availability.)
QTY PRICE TITLE AVAILABLE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 $16.80 The Constant Gardener 2 - 3 Days
--------------
$16.80 Net Product
$0.00 Gift Wrap
$0.00 Tax
$4.48 Shipping
--------------
$21.28 Total Order Price
$21.28 Credit Card
That is obviously from our own Bookstore at the very top of every page on SeniorNet???
Ok here is the same book on Amazon:
Purchase Details
Order #1: Ginny Anderson
Subtotal of Items: $16.80
Shipping & Handling: $4.48
Total Before Tax:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$21.28
Tax: $0.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total for this Address: $21.28
Shipping method: Standard Shipping
Ok the reason I'm putting this here is because they both look equal, right?
(Amazing, isn't it, they must both keep track of the other daily) but appearances are often deceiving.
Because Barnes & Noble thru our Bookstore, gives SeniorNet 7 % of each purchase price? As long as you go thru the clickable at the very top of every page:
RoundTable Index, Chat, Gatherings, Bookstore, Policies ....right under the top logo, then B&N gives SN the revenues.
So it doesn't cost you one more penny if you like to order online, to use SeniorNet's B&N site, and it does some good, too.
You might want to consider that, some time?
Just thought you might not know.
ginny: back in a mo!
Ann Alden
February 16, 2001 - 02:17 pm
Ginny,
The man who dreamt up Credit Mobilier was pretty slick. If the railroad had never been finished, his company would still have received money from the government subsidies. By having the railroad hire his company, send the money(which they received from the government) to his construction company where it was sent on to Credit Mobilier which didn't really exist. So the taxpayers money(the government subsidies) went to the stock holders in the railroad. I think this is right! Anyone else there who can explain this better?
losalbern
February 16, 2001 - 07:33 pm
Tonight I watched the old movie "Love In The Afternoon" and in the final dramatic scene in the Paris railway station, where Gary Cooper is leaving behind Audrey Hepburn, the camera switched to show the huge locomotive with 8 or 10 drive wheels starting to move. I was so busy counting them that I lost track (no pun intended) of the story line. Must have been articulated. The locomotive, I mean. I must learn to count faster.
Ann Alden
February 17, 2001 - 02:38 am
Yes, lasel, I too find myself counting wheels of locomotives whenever I see a picture of one or, as you, in a movie. Ginny has started something, hasn't she?
I believe that I left something out of my understanding of the Credit Mobilier. It was the sale of stock involved. I really don't understand that part, Ginny! Unless, the stockholders on receiving monies for construction, could purchase stock at lower price and then resell it for more? Ughhhhhh! Is there a test later? I hope not!
Ginny
February 17, 2001 - 02:46 am
WHAT are you doing up at this unbelievable hour, Mrs. Alden? hahahaha
Is there a test later? If there is, I must copy off yours!! Still looking for a photo of articulated train hinges and that URL you supplied has page after page of wheel configurations, and more more on ALL of your wonderful posts, what a joy to be able to bask in such combined ....I don't know the word, but just having come from another site there they consider their...bleatings....to be a gift, let me tell you, there are gifts and there are gifts and YOU, Dear Readers, are the true GIFT!
Back in a moment!
ginny
Ginny
February 17, 2001 - 10:29 am
Ann: I've brought a huge photo today of a train
guarded by union troops on a hastily erected trestle bridge during President Lincoln's tenure. You can't see the soldiers to the left of the engine who are guarding the track. In the inset you can see workers trying to drag an intentionally derailed engine back up on the tracks. Can YOU imagine trying to drag an engine anywhere?
This photo is extremely huge and long to load but you can see the trestle which we have been reading about.
Ann, I don't know, that statement may well apply to the trees only, I wish somebody who was more familiar with Sherman would either spring here to his defense or explain his remark!~
Isn't that type of Credit Mobilier concept called today by another name and not such a nice one?
Willie: I can't for the life of me find a photo of those hinges of the articulated engines, do you have any source for that? I have sat so long in front of photos with magnifying glass that my husband is beginning to look worried? hahahahaa
Thank you SOO much for that wonderful explanation of the gauge of the track, the Romans and the space shuttle, I'm putting it on an html page and we'll consider that your own link under reader supplied links! You would think that people would get tired of matching old Roman wheel ruts, tho, wouldn't you, especially considering their withdrawal from England fairly early on?
(See how much I know about history?)
Rambler: great question to which I have no clue as an answer, will put it in the heading, Why would there be so much interest in pushing the Transconental Railroad during the Civil War? Anybody???
Losalbern: Thank you for identifying the mystery photo as the inside of an engine cab. From the standpoint of a woman who pats her car on the dashboard when it runs, the very sight is horrendous. Turns out you were right, too, on the gauge thing, and it makes sense, why change gauge when you have one that works, and Willie has done us proud with that explanation.
THANK you for the best quote of the year about you and the Gary Cooper movie and the counting of wheels! Up in the heading it goes and maybe somewhere else, too, that was priceless, I laughed out loud.
Now we know why the Camaro went out of style, eh, Betty? haahahahhaa That was funny.
Harold, I have successfully ordered the American Notes, wanted to go thru the Bookstore at the top of the page and had to do an advanced search for this by title AND author and you are so right that Puck or Pook's Hill is on there, don't you want to know what THAT'S about.
Harold had mentioned Great Eastern, and here is a photo of its builder,
Isambard Kingdom Brunel engineer extraordinaire, standing in front OF the Great Eastern. We will see tomorrow a tunnel he constructed with an amazing feature.
(Why is it that so many people posed for photographs back then with their hands in their coats? Did they all have angina?)
Between this discussion and the Renato's Luck where the author is just beyond fabulous we're really on a roll here in the Books.
But tell me, Historians, what did you make of this chapter? Dry as dust? Is it just me?
Here's something to perk us all up, another engine configuration, can you guess what it might be hahaahha (but DON'T miss Gary Cooper this time) love that.
What's my configuration: the Chicago and NorthWestern No. 125, built at Alco's Schenectady Works in December 1908 ginny
Ginny
February 17, 2001 - 11:02 am
The American Experience on Monday, February 19th, will present Abraham and Mary Lincoln: A House Divided on PBS, check your local listings? Apparently they intend to show another side to Mrs. Lincoln than has been previously revealed, I plan to watch at least the first installment.
ginny
Harold Arnold
February 17, 2001 - 01:47 pm
Ginny, in message 259 asked:
Why is it that so many people posed for photographs back then with their hands in their coats? Did they all have angina?
It is said that the reason so many 19th century portraits of men were posed with their hand inside their coat was the influence of Napoleon I, the late French upstart Emperor who continued to influence western culture for fifty years after his death in 1821. Napoleon was long plagued with stomach and digestive disorders that eventually killed him. It is thought he took the characteristic poise with his hand inside his coat over his stomach as an effort to lessen the pain and heartburn from the disorder. As late as the 1860’s even in America, Civil War generals were still emulating the great general by being pictured in this pose. Unfortunately for Napoleon his disorder came some century and a half before Zantec made stomach rubs unnecessary
I think the tunnel picture will be real interesting. I suppose this is where Brunel almost got killed in a cave-in.
By my count the wheel configuration of the locomotive pictured in #259 is 4/4/2.
Henry Misbach
February 17, 2001 - 04:04 pm
To your first question: Yes, I think it entirely probable that Dodge was injured in precisely the manner described. (It was not a peephole in a log, but underneath one. Chances are the ball hit him on a ricochet or kicked up enough debris to cause a serious wound.) What I've read and heard over the years leads me to believe that, quite often, it was just when you were fairly sure of not being hit that you got it in Civil War combat.
From all that we read about Dodge in these chapters, he seems considerably more ideological than many of his contemporaries about what ought to be the outcome of the war. See in particular his comments to a reporter about using former slaves both for labor and soldiery, a position still not widely in use as late as World War I! His repeated refusal to move to what we think would be a safer position than wartime leader may be an indication of the intensity of his commitment; or maybe, we are not the best judge of what was his safest move.
Judah was, of course, remarkable; but at least he had formal training as an engineer. His comment that "We have drawn the elephant. . ." is a metaphor open to some different interpretations. He had to be terse, as he was sending a wire. I wouldn't object to supplying [a picture of] between drawn and the. He had to mean that they had come far enough in the planning and financing to say: from here, we just have to see if we can do it.
Why the ships? One reason was that sea travel had become fairly routine by the mid-19th century. After all, the Venetians had sailed past the Pillars of Hercules via the Atlantic to seaports in the north of Europe, and the Genoese were hot on their trail, in the mid-13th century. As far as overland travel then is concerned, those folks could tell you the French were right all along: travel is travail, just as they had hinted. Also, those ox and horse skeletons tell a story that was well heeded. The more you had to carry with you, the better deal the ship was.
Train's white suit is an easy one: everybody else had to work.
A twelve MPH average, given the terrain and distance, would have beaten a horse. It could gallop faster, but couldn't have sustained the pace that far.
williewoody
February 17, 2001 - 04:08 pm
Ginny: I don't believe you will ever find a photo that shows the "hinges" on an articulated locomotive. I was standing right next to Union Pacific's Big Boy #3985 and although I wasn't specifically looking for them, they were certainly not obvious.
rambler
February 17, 2001 - 04:50 pm
Harold, Henry, williewoody, others: Most of all of us are clearly not in your league when it comes to r.r. history scholarship. But I am impressed with the good advice that Grenville Dodge gave to Abe Lincoln at the top of p. 24, bottom of p. 97.
Ann Alden
February 18, 2001 - 09:45 am
I think that I am learning more from the online posters in this folder than from the book.
In reference to the class that I was taking at Barnes&Noble University, the posters there did not like the book and found it wanting in the historical genre. There is another book that they used for reference which I am looking for right now.
Ann Alden
February 18, 2001 - 10:36 am
The title of that other book used at B&N is "The Routledge Historical Atlas of Railroads by John F. Stover. I am attempting to see if our local library has it.
Joan Pearson
February 18, 2001 - 12:28 pm
Remember the difficulties involving the northern route, crossing the Sierra Nevada...and someone asked why that range was always mentioned. Wasn't crossing the Rockies a challenge too? And there was a third range mentioned that needed to be crossed...the Wasatch, which we never did identify. It seems we all will hear about it come the next Olympics in Salt Lake City...there's even a photo with the article, which describes the jagged beauty of the Wasatch, the snow,
~ "if you have too much snow, you can't run the mountain events and it creates major traffic problems~ and
"the athletes' transportation system, because we knew how important it was to have athletes getting to their events on time".
I'll bet the atheletes take a train out there~ along the old northern route?
Wasatch Mountains
ANN! A BIRTHDAY GIRL? Did you think you'd get away with this if you didn't mention it? OH NO! We caught you...even if a wee bit late!
Happy Birthday, Ann!!!
Williewoody, I like the way your mind works - on that guage question!
Gauge>English builders>English trams>wagons>romans>chariots>2 war horses
And Ginny's photo of the trestle...don't forget that it was Leonardo d. V. who invented the wood bridge and trestle! everything fits together so neatly, doesn't it?
Ginny, I'm going to guess that
the Chicago NorthWestern is a 2-2-8-2 because of the articulated engine...
Harold, I prefer the more romantic explanation of why Napoleon poses for his prtraits with his hand on his heart...he wanted Josephine to know that his heart belonged to her when he was away at war. The not-so-nice part of that version is that she did not return his ardor and wasn't even faithful to him... I guess the heartburn is as good an explanation as any. Maybe that's WHY he had heartburn!
Lincoln really wanted the railroad from the gitgo, before he became President...in Chapter IV, I found this particularly moving... ~
"he (Lincoln) said (to some congressmen) that he would hurry it up so that when he retired from the presidency he could take a trip over it, it would be the proudest thing of his life that he had signed the bill in aid of its construction."
Ginny
February 18, 2001 - 03:18 pm
Harold and Joan P, thank you for that explanation of Napoleon and the hand, I guess seen from our perspective now it looks a bit odd, but so may the models who now pose with one foot in front of the other, in countless photos, it begins to look peculiar too.
Harold, you will particularly enjoy the Brunel photos today, I believe, what a fascinating man he was!
Henry, thank you for catching that under the peephole, I was envisioning shot thru the eye and waiting for the inevitable blind eye mention but none came.
Thank you also for your insights on Dodge's ideaological side and your explanation of the possible meaning of drawing the elephant, isn't this amazing, I love all the insights here and am really learning a lot.
That's the difference, Ann, between us and them. To read what you said is unbelievable to me, they just don't have our group here and excuse me but you have to go some to....well....we know who we have here, they have missed the boat, how about invite them over here? hahahaha
Henry said, "Train's white suit is an easy one: everybody else had to work. What an interesting thing to say. Once years ago on a train journey to Wales early in the morning my MIL and I encountered a whole train breakfast car full of well dressed businessmen going out of London. We ate with THE most snobbish fellow I think I have ever entountered in my life and HE was the only one on the train in a light colored suit. He really stuck out, was quite patrician and silver haired and I still think to this day he was "somebody," tho his admiration of....Gorbachov at the time didn't commend him to me. He referred to the cloud formation as "mare's tails," which I also had not heard, it was....it IS painful to even remember it, even today. I wondered what the suit meant then and now I guess....I suppose we could say that he would not be doing any sort of ordinary labor that day.
(sorry for the segue here)...
williewoody: I will give up my quest then if you can stand next to the monsters and not see them, but I DID find a better picture of a Big Boy which at least shows the difference in metal where it joins.
Rambler: you do see things that so many others miss, thank you for calling our attention to that! Are you planning to watch the Lincoln PBS special tomorrow?
Ann Alden: Happy Birthday!!!!! and thank you for that additional reference and that LINK again, from which I'm now putting THE most spectacular photos!
Joan P: Thank you for that link and that great photo, isn't it the strangest thing when you read about something and then the news reminds you of it immediately? I'll be thinking of these early pioneers and the Wasatch range when the Olympics starts!
More....
patwest
February 18, 2001 - 03:18 pm
Railroad joke:
What is a lawyer's favorite railroad?
The SOO Line.
Ginny
February 18, 2001 - 03:39 pm
OK the engine above in the last challenge was a 4-4-2 as Harold surmised, I think, Joan, that you go by the number of wheels which touch the track whether articulated or non articulated if I understand that correctly, and if I don't, somebody correct me!~
Here's a fabulous new one and a GREAT CLEAR photo in the bargain, which that last one certainly was not, I do apologize, but THIS one is really great and clear!
Here is a challenge, new rail enthusiasts! Here is the
UP 9000 Looking closely at where the wheels hit the tracks, what would you say THIS configuration is??
Here is a bit on this particular engine, the UP 9000:
The American Locomotive Company built 88 of these large freight locomotives for the Union Pacific starting in 1926. The 'Nines' as they were called on the UP proved to be remarkably versatile engines.
This is a three-cylinder locomotive; the third cylinder is wedged in the center of the steam chest between the two conventional cylinders. This extra cylinder drove an eccentric in the axle of the second pair of drivers for smoother application of power to the rails.
Originally, the fourth set of drivers were flangeless (for rounding tight curves) but this proved unnecessary. These engines (#9000 was the first built) hauled 120-car trains across the flatlands of Nebraska at 50 mph with comparative ease, their overall efficiency besting the Mallets they replaced by some 80% !
Isambard Kingdom Brunel was considered one of the engineering greats of his time. He built an "atmospheric traction" propulsion system for the South Devon Railway, built many bridges and docks, changed the gauge of the Great Western to 7 feet, and built railroads all over England. He built two locomotives, but his bridges, viaducts and stations (including Paddington in London) endure today.
Here is his famous
Box Hill Tunnel, nearly 2 miles long, which terrified early passengers who rode thru it in the dark for 20 minutes.
He cleverly oriented the tunnel so that the sun shone through the entire length on his birthday, which it still does.
The Royal Albert Bridge from Devon to Cornwall was Brunel's final accomplishment. It is neither a true tubular bridge nor a true stiffened suspension bridge, but a clever combination of the two concepts, and one of the arches deflected a bomb in WWII. It is still in use today.
Brunel worked himself to death. After hearing of an accident involving his great ship, the
Great Eastern,, he suffered a stroke. His workers lifted him into an armchair and placed it in a wagon, and Brunel made his final journey, slowly crossing his bridge from Devon into Cornwall, and then he died, a great artist and an engineering giant....Encyclopedia of Trains and Locomotives....
Fascinating, huh?
ginny
Ginny
February 18, 2001 - 03:40 pm
Pat, the sooooo line?
hahahaha
ginny
williewoody
February 18, 2001 - 04:43 pm
A few observations on Chapters 1 thru 4.
One thing that I have learned from this book is the part that Generals Grant and Sherman played in the building of the trans. R.R.
I had never thought of them other than as military leaders. It is easier to understand Grant's connection, since he eventually succeded Lincoln in the Presidency. But Sherman's involvement seems more unusual.
It is of particular note that the system of getting things done through Congress hasn't changed at all in 150 years. Both railroad companies utilized lobbyists and distributed large sums of funds in various forms to the campaign chests of key representatives and Senators.
Ginny
February 19, 2001 - 06:52 am
Great points, Williewoody and here's another one,
Many Congratulations to Williewoody and his wife Janet on their 57th Anniversary this month!
Betcha didn't think I knew that, did you? hahahahaha
Many congratulations!
ginny
Ginny
February 19, 2001 - 07:19 am
This Monday our train song is
"The Wabash Cannonball" and here are the lyrics, hold on to your chairs at who WROTE this thing?
The Wabash Cannonball
Hobo Ballad
Written By: Theodore Dreiser
Copyright Unknown
From the great Atlantic Ocean
To the wide Pacific shore
To the queen of flowing mountains
To the southbell by the door
She's long and tall and handsome
And loved by one and all
She's a modern combination
Called the Wabash Cannonball
Oh listen to the jingle
The rumble and the roar
As she glides along the woodlands
Through the hills and by the shores
Hear the mighty rush of engines
Hear the lonesome hobos' call
We're travelling through the jungles
On the Wabash Cannonball
The eastern states are dandies
So the western people say
From New York to St. Louis
And Chicago by the way
Through the hills of Minnesota
Where the rippling waters fall
No chances can be taken
On the Wabash Cannonball
Oh listen to the jingle
The rumble and the roar
As she glides along the woodlands
Through the hills and by the shores
Hear the mighty rush of engines
Hear the lonesome hobos' call
We're travelling through the jungles
On the Wabash Cannonball
Here's to Daddy Klaxton
May his name forever stand
And always be remembered
Through the courts throughout the land
His earthly race is over
Now the curtains 'round him fall
We'll carry him home to victory
On the Wabash Cannonball!
Now obviously this refers to an actual train, yet I can find nothing on it, do any of you know? I have found quite a bit on another Cannonball which wrecked in 1903, which photos, (not Casey Jones) and will put that here tomorrow, but who is this Daddy Klaxton person and what WAS the Wabash Cannonball ( my dog loves the train whistle at the beginning)....
ginny
Harold Arnold
February 19, 2001 - 08:58 am
Concerning the Railway Track Gague and the Death of Brunel
Railway Track Gague. Here is a quote from “The Great Iron Ship (p24):
Brunel lost his biggest parliamentary battle for the adoption of seven-foot railway tracks, in the famous Battle of the Gauges in 1846. Most British lines were four feet, eight and one half inches wide simply because that had been the width of mine carts for which the first rails were laid. Brunel and Daniel Gooch proved that trains ran faster and more comfortably on rails seven feet apart. But they were out numbered by lines using the conventional width. Today we are still riding on the mine cart gauge.
The Death of Brunel. In “The Great Iron Ship,” Brunel’s death at the early age of fifty-three, was attributed to his overwork at the time of the launching of the Great Eastern. The birth of the great ship was not easy. Apparently it was a side launch rather than the more conventional bow first slide to the water. The launch did not go as planned and Brunel involved solving the problems over worked and by the time the hull was afloat he was exhausted and ill. He had the best doctors of his day and was diagnosed with “Bright’s Disease” by Sir Richard Bright who had first described the disease. The good doctor prescribed a rest-cure in Egypt.
The Engineer sailed in genuine Brunel style with his wife, son and personal physician, a reference library, a carriage load of scientific instruments and three hundred weight of hams, tongues, soap and candles. During a Mediterranean mistral the doctor was moaning in his bunk below while the invalid was braced on the careening paddle box measuring the Beaufort force of the storm and the roll of the steamer. (Dugan, John, “The Great Iron Ship,” P36).
Not surprisingly perhaps Brnel’s health was not much improved on his return to England where he found his Company bankrupt. After reorganization the fitting out of the Great Eastern continued. This included finishing the lavish 62 X 36 foot grand saloon and facilities for 300 first class passengers. Brunell visited the ship only once after his return from Egypt and every one realized how much his health had deteriorated. On a maiden voyage in 1859 as the ship was leaving the harbor a serious steam explosion occurred doing major damage in the grand saloon since the stack involved in the explosion passed up through that room. The mirrors covering the outer surface of the stack were shattered in thousands of pieces, but there were no dead in the saloon since most of the passengers were elsewhere. Of course below in the engine room where they got the full force of the explosion, the damage was the worst and a number of the crew were killed. Days later when Brunel got the news he promptly died.
Mary W
February 19, 2001 - 09:00 am
Verry strange pece of work from Dreiser.
Hi everyone: This is the firt time I have posted here. I've been waiting for my copy of "nothing Like it etc" and now that I've finally received it I'll begin reading it today and try to catch up. In the meanwhile I'll continue to lurk and keep up with this
very interesting discussion.
Back later, Mary
Ginny
February 19, 2001 - 09:47 am
A grand welcome to you, Mary, and you have already shown uncommon acumen by reading the prior posts in this discussion.
We have here assembled a shining cast of authorities, enthusiasts, historians, railroad families and other interested parties to which we have just added YOU, (yay!) and I believe when you DO get the book that you will see you have not missed a trick here in our postings!
Yes, wasn't that strange for Dreiser, can it be the same one?
Welcome, please feel free to comment on anything you see till this point.
Is anybody planning to watch the Lincoln show tonight on PBS?
Thank you Harold, my goodness mirrors and stacks which came thru the ballroom, isn't history wonderful? If you tried to imagine that for fiction, you would fail. Stranger than fiction. Somewhere I read that Brunel's 7 foot thing really failed in more ways than one. He also tried parallel ties I believe and was just ingenious.
Thanks for that,
ginny
losalbern
February 19, 2001 - 10:03 am
Happy Birthday Ann.. And many more of them too And to Mr and Mrs Williewoody. Wow! Happy anniversary ! Enjoy, enjoy!
Henry Misbach
February 19, 2001 - 02:13 pm
Ginny, I appreciate the picture of #9000. It calls to mind the dimensions of some of the engines I remember from my childhood. I consider younger generations culture-gypped, never to have heard a steam engine struggle to get traction (chug-chug-chug. . .CHUG. . .CHUG. . .chug-chug-chug). I've heard small children use the choo-choo onomotopeia as if it were for the whistle instead of the piston strokes (it's hard to imagine what you've seen close up only in movies).
Your chap in white certainly sounds like a cold fish. Our overall tendency in this society would be to think of conversation specific to an upper class as at best amusing and at worst ridiculous.
Actually I'm sorta glad Dodge got it instead of me!
LouiseJEvans
February 19, 2001 - 03:07 pm
Here is another train tune:
Orange Blossom Specialand another Train Blues
rambler
February 19, 2001 - 03:47 pm
Would not such tracks, with the tremendous stability they could offer, have accommodated rail cars roughly 12-14 feet wide, maybe more? Think of the freight such cars could carry! Think of the passenger capacity, the speed (because of the added stability) and the luxury! Crossing prairie and mountains might be like sailing the QE II in calm seas! Of course, tunnels would have been much tougher to dig and there would have been many other complications. Could engines, even today's engines, have pulled such cars?
I would like to hear from our railroad buffs on this matter.
rambler
February 19, 2001 - 05:49 pm
Before we finish Chapter 4, perhaps I should mention that I am, for reasons long forgotten, a stockholder in Union Pacific. On bad days, (there have been many), I think of it as Union Pathetic.
FaithP
February 19, 2001 - 07:56 pm
Rambler, If you were pulling a car 10ft wide even if the engine was extremly powerful it would also be soooo wide, think of the wind resistance! It almost seems like an impossible task to have the wide gauge tracks with the really wide cars and really big locomotive engines. Faith
losalbern
February 19, 2001 - 09:20 pm
I added both of your clickables to my train song repertory, which make me wonder where people are finding these tunes? The "Train Blues" number has some passages that sound a great deal like "Honky Tonk Train". Can't remember the piano player who made such a big hit with that in the '50s. Freddie Slack, maybe?
Ginny
February 20, 2001 - 03:55 am
I agree, Losalbern, thank you, Louise for those midis, that Orange Blossom Special is really good, have put both in the heading. Here are the words, however few, to the Orange Blossom Special, which I think is a song designed to show the virtuosity of the fiddler and boy does it, I love that:
Orange Blossom Special
Train sounds
Look yonder coming
Coming down that railroad track.
Hey, look yonder coming,
Coming down that railroad track,
It's the Orange Blossom Special,
Bringing my Baby back!
That's pretty much it as far as the lyrics go!
Henry so Dodge dodged the bullet, hah? (aggg....sorry!) hahahaha
Yes that guy in the light and I believe it may even have been seersucker suit was awful, have never forgotten it, actually. Too bad he didn't encounter YOU, that would have fixed him, I get totally ...uh...intimidated actually I got angry and that shut ME up. I do remember he spoke of Houston, TX, where he had been sent for a job once and how ungodly hot it was?
Henry mentions the
UP 9000, and I just suddenly realized that that might be one of the trains you were speaking of? That 12 stuff?
It's a monster, no doubt about that. I got in a friendly debate yesterday over that train and I hope the other combattant will come in here and resume it, let's see if it happens!
Rambler and Faith, (hahahah Union Pathetic) hahaahha here's more on the 7 foot wide span from the Encyclopedia of Trains and Locomotives, which I am totally wearing out:
Despite the clearly established standard gauge of 4 feet 8 1/2 inches, Brunel disregarded all warnings and advice and insisted on a broad gauge of 7 feet for the Great Western. Even in 1835, it was becoming obvious that the various rail lines spreading through out Great Britain would eventually need to be knitted together into a connecting system, and the proposed broad gauge of the GWR would put it at a disadvantage. Initial construction costs would be higher for both right of way and rolling stock as well.
Brunel prevailed on the matter of gauge , however, and also pursued a fetish for easy grades, further causing construction difficulties….The Great Western system ultimately included 600 miles of broad gauge track, 230 miles of mixed gauge, and 420 miles of narrow gauge.
Brunel's vision was in question as this mixture of gauges proved to be a serious handicap. Shippers signed petitions requesting standardization because wide gauge goods wagons were rarely filled and were therefore uneconomical to use. The GWR began to convert to standard gauge in 1868 and finished in 1892, thus ending the battle of the gauges in Great Britain.
All over the world, different countries experimented with different gauges. Aa individual rail lines began to merge and connect into transportation systems, however, connecting lined of differing gauges were at a competitive disadvantage. Cargo had to be unloaded (usually by hand) from the cars of one gauge to the cars of another. Passengers had to disembark from their trains, often in the middle of the night, and reboard the next train. This was both inconvenient and costly.
In England, a gauge differential between broad and standard gauge at Gloucester inspired a popular expression, "Lost at Gloucester," which became the universal explanation of anything mislaid on the British rail system.
Somewhere I can't find where those wide loads also when the gauge changed could not go thru the narrow gauge or standard tunnels, but I can't find it now and may have dreamed it up!
Did any of you get to see the Mary and Abe Lincoln things last night and if so, what did you think of it? Unfortunately my husband wanted to watch the History channel at the same time so I missed it.
Ginny
February 20, 2001 - 04:04 am
hahahaha I HAVE to share this, this is just a riot. In typing that long thing above, I thought to myself, why not type it in Word first and then just do a spell check and save yourself all that going back thru?
So I did. And then when the red underlined for bad typing, I just right clicked and paid very little attention to what it was substituting.
Thus I just read, to my slightly hysterical eyes, that the passengers had to disembark in the Midol of the night hahahahahaahahah
oh boy I needed that this morning.
hahahaahaha
Now WHY on earth would WORD put in Midol? I have no clue and am afraid to ask. hahahahaha (Hey: Remember that old song: Shoo doup shoobey do...shoo doop shoobey do... "In the Still...er in the MIdol....shoo dooop. hahahaha.... of the night.....hahahahaa)
sigh
patwest
February 20, 2001 - 05:09 am
The Mary and Abe Lincoln - American Experience, was all right ... but I was a bit disappointed. The narration voices were
not the best. There was no reenactment and consisted of just reading. (a good thing I have CC). I live in IL where we feel
that we own "Lincoln". And I don't think that there was any material presented that I hadn't already read or heard.
FaithP
February 20, 2001 - 11:43 am
Pat maybe you are like me. I have read at least four good biographys of Lincoln including that big three volumn thing by the poet whatsisname. Also two very good biographys of Mary Todd. So, there was no new material but some of the pictures, and sketchs were new to me so I think may have been done for the program. I also read a book one time that told Sewards involvement politically with Lincoln and was written as an expose` so do not know how accurate that was. The only thing in this documentary that mentioned Abe in relation to Railways was his involvement as a Lawyer for the Railroad, then also when he was running for his state House seat he was using opening transportation to the west as a platform, re the canal. I watched it all and enjoyed it .
I did think this was much more sympathetic to Mary Todd than most biographys. Faith
FaithP
February 20, 2001 - 11:47 am
Train Blues fills my office with the sounds so much since my son put that woofer on the floor over in the corner. I feel like I am on the train the first start up of the song. Thank You Thank you Faith
Ann Alden
February 20, 2001 - 02:57 pm
Wasn't that David McCulloch doing the narrative? A very good biographer himself. I gave up after half an hour because there wasn't anything there that I hadn't read either. As my husband remarked,"They could have put this on the radio!"
Ginny
February 21, 2001 - 04:29 am
Yeah, me, too, unfortunately, we get PBS from two states here and I did see a little of it last night, Lincoln's voice totally turned me off, was it felt that he did have a high squeaky Southern voice? I would not have thought so but know so very little about these things.
Tomorrow let's move on to the next chapter unless there are issues in this one we'd all like to address?????
I've already gone ahead and I must say, am about 1/2 way thru, I feel very much sympathy for Mr. Judah and can't wait to hear your take on same. Also looked thru all the photos in the center of the book, was much taken by the one of the tunnel, boy that looks rough and the next to last photo, turns out those of you who mentioned fuel were right, there is a balloon or large stack on the left with a sort of hair net on it for the wood burning engine and the coal burner on the right has a straight stack, at the Last Spike.
I must say for somebody like me who is totally ignorant of history that it's sort of a thrill to finally know the people in THIS happening anyway evenat this late date in life, I believe I appreciate the knowledge more.
At any rate I am grateful for your fine input here.
On to Judah and the Elephant tomorrow! Any thoughts from any of you while we pause, here, chuffing as Henry said,....I'll tell you that Train Blues thing Louise put here is more of a soundtrack of a real train, I don't know how she got that but it's less k on the server than the ones I've been putting up and played forever. You could tape that thing and play it over a model train set were you so inclined.
Speaking of model train sets, I found something very interesting in the news two weeks ago, let me go see if I can find it!
Anything you'd like to add before tomorrow? Memories of trains or relatives connected with trains???
ginny
Ginny
February 21, 2001 - 04:32 am
OH on the
UP 9000 if you've guessed but hesitate to try, it's a 4-12-2, is THAT not an engine? hahahaa
Getting up an HTML page of same!
ginny
Ginny
February 21, 2001 - 04:33 am
OH on the
UP 9000 if you've guessed but hesitate to try, it's a 4-12-2, is THAT not an engine? hahahaa
Getting up an HTML page of same!
ginny
Ann Alden
February 21, 2001 - 06:21 am
Did you say that is a model train, ginny? Whoa! I count the same as you, 4-12-2. Is it articulated? I will go look! No, it is not articulated.
Ginny
February 21, 2001 - 06:31 am
Noooo, Ann, that's a real one but I found a fascinating article ON model trains and the people who run them if I can just find it, you're right. Now as to articulated, it's hard for me to articulate (hahahaha) if it is or not.....er.....hmmmmm...I would say not? I think you are correct, what are you basing YOUR idea on?
Just based on the wheels. My understanding of articulated (and most of the articulated engines have two different colors in the long body but that's a child's looking at it not somebody who knows anything) but my understanding is that it's two complete engines under the hood there. And this one is not.
But I stand waiting to find out.
I went back and read the description I posted originally about it and I don't see the words articulated or non articulated and I don't see different colors on the boiler? So I think it must be nonarticulated but await a more definitive answer.
Anybody want to take a stab????
ginny
Ginny
February 21, 2001 - 06:33 am
I am actually quite concerned about our Ella and hope you will let us know when you hear something, no news is good news, perhaps!
Hope so!
ginny
Harold Arnold
February 21, 2001 - 07:39 am
The next to the last picture of the last spike meeting that Ginny mentioned can be used as a quiz question. Cover the text and ask which direction is east, which is west? I presented this to some of the staff at the ITC. Of course I suppose there is a 50% chance for a correct guess, but I asked that no answer be given without the reason. A few gave the correct answer based on the map convention that the up direction is north, but no one used the engine stack as the criteria. A better way to state the question perhaps would be, which engine is Central Pacific; which is Union Pacific?
Henry Misbach
February 21, 2001 - 12:58 pm
I can add little to this erudite discussion of locomotive articulation. I do find it interesting that the type of fuel determined the shape of the smoke-stack. In my history of Kansas City, there's a picture of No. 828 with the wood-burning configuration, taken next to a very old version of Union Depot. The picture was taken in 1879. You'd have thought the wood burners would have been replaced by then.
I have come across, quite by accident, Professor Ambrose's information. In this book, he is writing for the general reader. His magnum opus is a three-volume history of the political career of Richard Nixon.
patwest
February 21, 2001 - 04:32 pm
Here is my contribution to train picture's. This 4-6-4 CB&Q RR Locomotive was given to the city of Galesburg, IL in in the late '70s when they first started the Railroad Days Weekend... For several years it would be taken out of the fence and used to carry sightseers on flatcars out to the "hump" yards... a tender, baggage, and way car have been added to the site.
CB&Q
#3006 4-6-4 Locomotive
Joan Pearson
February 22, 2001 - 06:01 am
I just love these old photographs, Pat! I marvel at the ones in the center of the book too...especially the celebration when the two lines met. Do you think they had a professional photographer all along the route?
What powerful resources we have at our fingertips? I wonder if Mr. Ambrose surfs for information as we do? He
has to, wouldn't you think? I went looking for different
colors to answer Ginny's question above and found more on articulated engines. We seem to be taken by this phenomenon, and rightfully so. Without them, the mountain curves would never have been negotiated! Look here for more on
articulated locomotives...
I have been searching for at least a drawing of the crucial hinge that holds the two parts together, but without success! The search did yield this page of articulated engines which you can click to enlarge...Ginny, maybe you can see a variation in color on one of them...
Articulated Locomotives Or was it here:
Articulated Or here?
More Articulated" You know I think that's what brought me back to watch the end of the PBS House Divided? Not the production itself, but those photographs! They were amazing. There were some train photos too ...Lincoln on his way to Gettysburg. But the photos from the battlefield! I don't know that we still take photos of our dead soldiers on the battlefield like that, do we? They bring you right onto the battlefield!
So the UP and the CP created the precedent for goverment aid to business! The government created a class of capitalists! That idea is mind-boggling to me! Is is still going on today to this extent? Can you think of any examples? (This coming from the wife of an anti-trust lawyer!)
Chapter V, the actual building and financing of the railroad is so predictable...wild elephants!!!! Let's go!
Ann Alden
February 22, 2001 - 06:30 am
Ginny
Ella called last night and they are home safe. Dick came down with pneumonia and spent a night in the hospital but is better now. They arrived on Tuesday night. He has a Monday appointment with his doctor.
JoanP, the last photo is a fantastic example of the articulated lomotive. Very defined, I believe!
I am in the middle of Chapter V and find it just so dry that I had to quit reading for awhile.
Ann Alden
February 22, 2001 - 06:44 am
Harold, would I be looking south or a little south east if I were the photographer?
williewoody
February 22, 2001 - 06:53 am
Joan: I may be mistaken, but I believe the government bailed out Chrysler and Lee Iacoca back several years ago when Chrysler was about to go bankrupt. I remember that Iacoca made a big point of the fact that Chrysler paid back the government to the penny.
Then there was the failed Savings and Loan bailouts more recently. Can't think of any others at the moment.
FaithP
February 22, 2001 - 12:25 pm
Joan put up those sites re: Ariculated Locomotives and I just spent an hour reading about Articulated Compound locomotives, skim reading at that so if I had read it word for word I would be in there for hours. It was fascinating and reminded me of all those conversations my great uncles used to have up in Sparks at family gatherings, conversations I did not understand except it was about their work on the railroad. Wish I had total recall. Maybe I should be hypnotized.FP
LouiseJEvans
February 22, 2001 - 12:26 pm
Clementine(I wanted you to see it as the duchess has it. When I put it into my files the graphics don't go.)
Ann Alden
February 22, 2001 - 01:15 pm
I don't know if this will get up in the site as I have been unable to post anything since early this morning. Wanted to say that the government bailed Lockheed-Georgia(now Lockheed-Martin) on the C-5 fiasco in the late '70's and I believe that Lockheed repaid that debt.
Louise, I wish that I could listen to your wonderful music but I only get RealAudio in my MAC.
LouiseJEvans
February 22, 2001 - 01:21 pm
Now that is interesting. Actually the link is to an html page which has the sound embedded. When I try to put it into my own files I lose the sound and graphics. I have figured out how to edit the sound back in.
losalbern
February 22, 2001 - 03:55 pm
Joan, That was some tidbit of articlated locomotive information you passed onto us struggling neophytes. I must have read for 15 minutes before finding a part of a sentence that I understood where it pointed out that "steam is exhausted into the atmosphere." If that doesn't point up my ignorance, this will. I decide to print out the article without realizing its length; all 31 pages! However, all is not in vain. I now how a printed picture of a Mallet Articulated Locomotive With a Double Ball Joint ! Kidding aside, Joan those pictures of Articulated Locomotives are great !
Ginny
February 22, 2001 - 04:25 pm
Pant puff pant puff, running behind and Harold don't you DARE tell till I get in here, I have storms and I have SOOOO much to say, carry ON with this chapter till I can get back on tomorrow, so much to SAY!
So whose railroad WAS it really, in YOUR eyes? Judah's or the Fabulous Four???
Back early in the morning, do NOT tell, Harold!
ginny
Harold Arnold
February 22, 2001 - 07:29 pm
Ann Alden in message #302 asked:
Harold, would I be looking south or a little south east if I were the photographer?
An interesting question and I don’t think we can give a definite answer. All that we know for certain is that the engine on the left is Central Pacific and it came from California to the west; and the engine on the right is Union Pacific and came from Omaha to the east. We might assume that the two engines are aligned generally on an east/west line though it is a certainty that at any give spots very significant deviations were required.
Note that the shadows seem to point generally from the left on a slightly upward course toward the right. This suggests to me that the picture as taken about 3 to 5 hours before sunset when the sun was still pretty high in the south west sky.. The way I see it the camera is pointed Noorth and perhaps a bit west..
The event took place May 10, 1869. The ceremony begun about noon but 3 or 5hours or more may have passed before this picture was made. they begun by laying the last section of rail.
The Central Pacific Railroad Museum Link given in the heading has several versions of the picture. Click the following link for a version in color that appeared in Harpers Magazine, June 5, 1869.
From Harpers Weekly, June 5, 1869
Ann Alden
February 23, 2001 - 06:51 am
Yes, I think that I am wrong. From looking at that page at the Central Pacific Museum, it looks like the photographer would be looking north, with the Central Pacific on the left? You might want to read this account of the day at Promontory Point.
Transcontinental RR Meets
williewoody
February 23, 2001 - 07:21 am
Both Railroads had considerable problems raising capital to finance the bulding of their railroads. It is interesting to note that there seems to be no mention of shortage of materials. One would think that during the middle of a war it would be difficult to obtain anything metal, particularly iron which was the principal product needed for rails, spikes, joiner plates etc. Of course, costs escalated rapidly. The cost of rails was about $55 per ton before the war, and escalated to over $110 per ton as the war progressed.
The Central Pacific suffered most when it came to costs. All prices quoted were FOB Boston or other east coast ports. The Central then had to transport supplies via boat around South America to the west coast. Sometimes they used the "Short cut" across Panama by rail. For example, they shipped a new locomotive via Panama, The engine cost $10,000. and the freight cost $37,000.
The CP had some additional problems , not experienced by the UP. California law required that all debts had to be paid in silver or gold. Paper money was no good out there. Of course, funds raised by Huntington in the East were paid in good old US greenbacks, which was legal tender. So the CP lost about half the value of the money received since the conversion to gold was at about 57cents on the dollar. About the only thing the CP had an advantage in was labor costs, since the Chinese worked for a lot less than what the UP paid its primarily Irish laborers. There was also another hidden advantage there, since the Chinese were a lot better workers, and caused less trouble than the rowdy Irish. The Chinese didn't drink hard liquor, and paid for their own food. They also suffered less illnes, which was attributed to the fact that they drank only tea, that required boiling water, which killed any bacteria.
Ann Alden
February 23, 2001 - 07:53 am
One of the things that keeps jumping out at me in this book, is that while all this is going on with the RR's, the Civil War is being fought. How did Lincoln and his Congress have any time to even think about the transcontinental railroad and run the war? I realize that they wanted to get this RR built so that is the US became two countries, the Union would have control of the railroad but it still seems like a great deal to be handling.
Harold Arnold
February 23, 2001 - 08:06 am
Williewoody, I wonder if most of the heavy equipment shipped by sea from the east coast around the horn to California was transported by the fast sail powered clipper ships? I have no recollection of having read of the answer to this question.
A month or so back I did a Google search on the search string, "Clipper Ships" and found a site that gave the time for a number of clipper's to make the trip between the 1840's and 70's. I was somewhat surprised by the rather wide variation that ranged from about two to four months. I suppose the uncertainity was the wind conditions encountered at the different times. By the mid 1860's steam ships were becoming more available and new ship construction was mostly by steam though the sail powered clipers remained in use for the remainder of the century.
Ginny
February 23, 2001 - 12:04 pm
I really appreciate everybody's wonderful contributions here, have read them all and am just renewed in amazement over all of your links and questions and information you take the time to bring here.
Thank you all, rather than address each, as I'm running totally behind, I'd like to start afresh with this chapter and put a few new thoughts in the heading, but the burning question with me was....
"Judah spoke of the Central Pacific as 'my railroad,' but it wasn't, any more than the railroads back east he had built or the Scramento Valley Railroad were his..." ( did I just spy a grammar error on Dr. Ambrose's part?)
"He had thought of it, dreamed of it, laid out the line for it, gone to Washington to convince the Congress and the Persident to get behind it. He had invited in the men who financed it. But it wasn't his."
Ok I'd like to pause here for all of those of you interested in history, in human character, and in things in general to tell me why it
wasn't his?
If you were in charge, whose would you consider it to be?
What is the basis of the apparently animosity between Huntington and Judah, can you tell? Do you have any other sources which might shed some light on this?
"All the Big Four were involved in Crocker's company, but not Judah." What does this say to you about the motivations of the Big Four?
Whose side are you on in this struggle? Have you seen other instances in history of this type of thing?
"And he still demanded deference. To hell with that." (page 178) Huntington on Judah: how is it that a man who could convince Congress had so little sway with his "own" railroad?
Let look at Theodore Judah for a while, what are your insights?
(Harold, you TOLD!!!) I would have said looking north simply because of the position of the engines, remember I'm the little girl who whispered that George was going the wrong way in the original Washington Crosses the Delaware painting, (do you notice, please, Gentle Readers, on the quarters, he's finally going the right way??? hahahahaha)
ginny
Ginny
February 23, 2001 - 12:09 pm
Thank you, Joan for those marvelous clickables, I think some of Ann's links had them too, but here is a great one showing difference in color from your first page:
Big Boy in color.
But now, see, I've been assuming (and yes I know what that makes of u and me) all along that THAT is where the hinge is and I now question that assumption, where the colors break? And so have written and hope to get more info to bring here as we go on, hold on to your seats, now!
ginny
losalbern
February 23, 2001 - 01:31 pm
All five of these men had strong character attibutes. The Big 4 had financial know how and they needed Judah because he knew how to build a railroad. Judah needed them because they had the up-front money to get the railroad started. It seemed inevitable that their strong wills would clash sooner or later. The basic problem that all 5 men faced was one of cash flow. The Government had placed incentive financial benchmarks primarily based on how much track was laid. CP progress was very slow getting up to and across the Sierras. Therefore their receipt of governmnet funds (bonds) was slow in coming and that placed a heavy burden of the Big 4 personal fortunes. And when even that was overtaxed, they borrowed a lot of operating capital on their own names just to keep the CP operating. No one would buy the CP stock or bonds so that capital was scarce. Judah thought they were cheating somehow but I dont see where there was much money to abscond with at that stage of the game. The Big 4 got in so deep financially, they had to finish that railroad. They had a bear by the tail and were afraid to let go. I was really caught off guard when I read that Judah died! Was the CP going to fold right there? But I have to give those people credit. They kept on struggling and got though the Sierras.
Ginny
February 23, 2001 - 01:38 pm
Oh and you raise another good point, Losalbern, what WAS Judah after with Vanderbilt when he died?
Do you think that the Big Four treated Judah honorably?
ginny
losalbern
February 23, 2001 - 02:13 pm
According to Judah's wife Anna, Judah felt that the Big 4 were ungrateful to him. I suspect that Judah had outlived his usefulness to them, having achieved Congressional backing of their project and saw to its early beginnings. It would appear that they thought of Judah as just a highly paid engineer, not necessarily part of the managemant team. So, one might imagine that they didn't respect him as much as they should. By the same token, Judah went to New York to find a new "angel" to buy the CP and get rid of the Big 4 influence altogether. It was time for Judah and the Big 4 to go their separate ways. And they surely did.
Harold Arnold
February 23, 2001 - 02:31 pm
Ginny, Ginny, I am sorry! Is that what you meant when you woite in message #309?
……. Harold don't you DARE tell till I get in here, ;;;;;
I didn’t understand what you were referning too, and finally decided you were referring to the last wheel configuration question. Oh my, now I feel like the smart elic kid who blurted out the answer. Sorry.
FaithP
February 23, 2001 - 04:15 pm
jUDAH was plotting to get Vanderbilt to bail out the CP and take it over. He never would have and Crocker and Huntington in particular would never have let Eastern money buy them clear out. They were in it for the long haul and sold everything they had to keep cash flow going. And that is basically why it was never Judahs railroad. It is sad he died of course, and sad Anna didnt benefit more for her courage in following him back and forth across a pretty wild country. Of course it was miserably difficult and yet "big business" while improving the life of the masses still do it for the money. Individually the big four had their dreams too.
Judah was almost totally forgotten in history when I was a child in California and Nevada schools. We learned of the big four. We respected them and gave them the Credit still it was not until the 40's that Judah got the respect which indeed he deserved.
In the long run I do not think Judah was treated wrongly. He just didnt see the complicated financial web that the others had constructed, and he was stubborn.Perhaps he also was not going to stand for others telling him where to start his railroad. The argument would seem specious today. The foothills really do not start until Auburn. Roseville is on the flat eluvial land that is the whole valley. That gravel they talk about is where the gold is.
Over a few miles from the deep gravel pits described in the book were the Folsom/Natomas company dreges which dug down and pulling their own water with them shoveled up miles and miles of gravel to run through their "mills" on board .The gravel was washed and drained and trown back out on the sides of the dredge pond. The muck left was what the mecury ball mills used to extract the gold from.Where I live on this side of the American river, all along the highway to the foothills you can see the gravel pits and piles thrown up by the dreges. The whole city of Folsom is built on the gravel pits. I wondered when I was reading if they ever thought of the gold that was in that gravel.
But they didnt know about it yet and now I have to go and research when did the dredges start, and when did we get the first railroad to Folsom, (first power plant in Sacramento Valley). One thing leads to another doesnt it. Faith
Ginny
February 23, 2001 - 04:16 pm
Harold, you are irrepressible and for all your work at our National Historical Sites (everybody go look at Harold's Home Page) you are forgiven this ONE time! hahahahaa
Everybody, BIG news, I have found the key to the question of the articulation and as soon as I get back from the bookstore (another book, Ann!) will reveal all.
Meanwhile have extended an invitation to look in to a very gracious man, Jim Winter, of the CPRR museum. org, who very kindly has answered the question about the hinges!! Yes!! And I'm off to get the book he recommended, and hope to return and find him in here, I told him you were all enthusiasts and families of railroading and hopefully he'll look in.
YAY!! Railroad people are the BEST!
ginny
FaithP
February 23, 2001 - 08:32 pm
Folsom Townsite -- In June 1849, Captain Joseph Libby Folsom purchased the Leidesdorff estate for $75,000 fro Leidesdorff's mother, Anna Sparks. The purchase, which also included property in San Francisco, made Folsom the wealthiest man in California, but it also entangled him in legal disputes with Anna Sparks which were not resolved until after his death. Folsom hired Theodore Judah, who was in Sacramento to help build the Sacramento Valley Railroad, to survey and layout a township of the American River Rancho near Negro Bar. Folsom called it "Granite City". Unfortunately, in July 1855, town lots in Granite City (which was renamed "Folsom") were put up for sale. All sold the first day. That same day, the first train pulled into Folsom. Eventually some 21 stage lines moved from Sacramento to Folsom to carry the vast traffic to and from the northern mines and the Comstock Lode at Virginia City, Nevada.
Ginny
February 24, 2001 - 04:04 am
Running late and on my way out of town, I need to scan in the illustration below but here's Dr. Winter's explanation of the hinge stuff on the articulated engines:
I wrote explaining I could not see the hinge, was it on the boiler where the colors changed??
Probably the confusion is that there isn't any
hinged boiler -- what pivots is separate frames each with sets of wheels and
cylinders.
In one design, there is a short frame with one set of wheels and cylinders
hinged to a second longer frame with a second set of wheels and cylinders,
also supporting the boiler and cab. This is illustrated at the bottom of
pages 16-17 of the "Eyewitness Book: Trains" published by Knopf.
The powerful articulated Beyer-Garratt type locomotive later used in countries in Africa, as wellas India, Australia and Britain.The front of the Beyer-Garratt engine showing a separate power unit
Now I'm not sure if that helps or hurts as we've not seen this extreme an example? Help????
He wrote further: Here are some related websites:
"Articulated Locomotive - A steam-powered locomotive with two separate sets
of wheels and cylinders-each of which pivots on separate frames." "ARTICULATED
LOCOMOTIVE - A locomotive where two engines (sets of cylinders, valve gear
and wheels) were provided under the same frame but pivoted to allow
transition through curves in spite of the long wheelbase. Garratt and Mallet
were two types of articulated locomotives. Much favoured in Africa, India
and the US but not common in Europe and the UK. Some locomotives built to
Fairlie's patent also had two engines but not all were articulated."
states that "First example
built 1904 for the Baltimore & Ohio. It was this first Mallet articulated
built in the U.S." More on Articulation Steam engines Articulated Bless his heart. He also says:
You might also enjoy David Bain's wonderful book "Empire Express: Building
the First Transcontinental Railroad"
ed
This meticulously research book which David spent 14 years working on was
the Book of the Month Club Main Selection.
Have any of you read this book?
I'm on my way out of town this morning but wonder if YOU think Judah himself was going to attempt a coup with Vanderbilt????
Wonder if this new book would tell us?
What do you all think this morning?
ginny
Ginny
February 24, 2001 - 04:46 am
I know Ann has had some difficulty in getting this discussion to load are any of the others of you having trouble getting in here at all?
Many of our Books discussions are HOT and so it's hard, sometimes to get in here?
Let us know if you are having problems, either email me or post here if you are able, it's possible we may need to reduce the size of that heading, let us know?
Out of town, see you tonight!
ginny
patwest
February 24, 2001 - 05:32 am
There have been a number of occurances where SN will not load at all and then there have been times when all of SN loads very slowly.
Speed of loading is also determined by the path your server takes to reach the server that SN uses.
The graphics in this heading total about 74K.. which might be a bit more than desireable... but it is an attractive heading.
losalbern
February 24, 2001 - 11:53 am
There have been a few times lately where I could reach the SeniorNet web site but couldn't login. Whenever that happened I went to the AOL "sign on" site and used their setup button to change my dial up telephone number and I got right on with my next attempt. Works for me.
FaithP
February 24, 2001 - 03:13 pm
It is true. Sometimes I cannot get into Seniornet and when I finally do get a server path, I find the subscription click will not change my location page. I wait and wait and it stays hung up. Now I have gotten smarter. I close out and go back to my desktop. Disconnect. Reconnect and go in again and usually this new path will take me right where I want to go and no hang ups changing locations with the subsciption clickx. Other times I can jus wake up a hung computer by hitting enter key once. It seems to help but we dont know why, my son the techie and I. Faith
Henry Misbach
February 24, 2001 - 08:31 pm
Rambler, I agree with you about the others you mention. You would find both the depth and width of my ignorance in the subject at hand quite shocking. I have brought very little to this except a general interest in the subject and, maybe, a heightened sense of how historians work. . .uh, when they do work.
Really, the fact that poor hapless Judah was run over by the moneybags is no great surprise to me. The early history of the automotive industry, both here and abroad, shows surprising parallels. Durant and a fellow you may not have heard of before, name of August Horch, were the engineering brains behind their car companies in the early 20th century. Each man was compelled to leave his company and re-do most of what he had done. Horch, whose name means "listen" in German, cleverly translated his name into Latin, so he could create Audi (people used to ask me how to pronounce it--I would ask them what do they say when they say "listen" in Latin).
I forget whose post it was, but someone has pointed out that Judah was even steamrollered historically, so that his truly enormous contribution was obscured. I am with Losalbern: as little as I know about the geography of Upper or Alta Cal, the choice of Sacramento over San Francisco makes no sense. But that name Stanford keeps coming up.
Isn't it a remarkable coincidence that, given the chance to have a big office building designed for them, the Big Four were content to conduct business in Stanford's store, and keep Judah out of town and on the road. Nor need we pass over in silence the fact that Stanford was Governor of California. The Stanford fortune's impact has to be huge. Go onto the Stanford University campus sometime. I haven't seen it since about 1961 (as a visitor); the proximity of it and its role in the formation of Silicon Valley has to give one pause.
Joan Pearson
February 24, 2001 - 09:37 pm
We can argue whose railroad this is, but what does that mean really?
Who was responsible for bringing it to life? The birth mother of course was Judah. Without the support of the Federal Government, the railroad would not, could not have been built, when it was (doesn't mention of the Civil War just keep jumping out at you, reminding you that this railroad maneuvering was going on during this emotionally, financially draining war??!! They had to bid against the Federal Armies to get this thing passed!)
Who but Judah could have managed to get Lincoln's attention and backing? And the Congress? Who else had surveyed the northern route and figured ways to conquer the building of the railway through the Sierra Nevada?
I have no doubt that a railroad would eventually have been built without Judah, but where and when?
He just wasn't any match ~ the sheer size of the project, once set in motion, fueled by the profit motives of so many! The steamroller! The elephant!
Just as Judah underestimated costs, ("$50 a foot, he said; $1,000 per foot closer to reality"), he underestimated the power of the Big Four, their resources and ability to find the money Judah didn't have, and their own desire for the big money. Even stronger than their desire to see the railroad completed!
Charlie Crocker awards the Charles Crocker & Company the contract for the building the roadway AND supplying the materials, equipment, rolling stock and all the buildings too. WOW! Of course the Big Four gets credit for bringing the Central Pacific to reality. Of course the BIG Four owns it in that sense!
Faith, you don't know how much I appreciate knowing the existence of the Theodore D. Judah Elementary School out in Sacramento! His name and memory live!
The "rolling stock" interests me!
the locomotives, 42 freight cars, passenger cars..where did they come from? How did they get to the West? Boat? Were they built in the West?)
Joan Pearson
February 24, 2001 - 09:58 pm
Oops, almost forgot this...the Central Pacific's ground breaking scene, January 8, 1863...poor old Judah wasn't even there. Charlie Crocker was though. So was Governor Stanford, Henry! It was grand, even if it did rain. The band played
Wait for the Wagon and everyone sang! If you click the link, you see the words, but if you look in the top left corner, you may hear the MELODY too! What fun they all had...except Judah and Anna!
Ginny
February 25, 2001 - 05:25 am
Joan thank you soo much for that Wait for the Wagon site, I'll get a jump on Monday's tune by proclaiming it the tune of the week and work on the lyrics to Clementine (thank you so much, Louise) and present that next week, both are really ....old timey sounding songs, aren't they? From the "miners, 49ers," in Clementine (I have always loved that "Light she was, and, like a fairy, and her shoooeees were number 9, herring boxes without topses, sandals were for Clementine!" haahahah Looking for the rest of it to make sure I remember that correctly, I'm a No. 9 myself haahaha
But
Wait for the Wagon, now
there's an old tune and to think they played it at the inauguration of the CP groundbreaking!
Here are the lyrics:
Wait for the Wagon
R. Bishop Buckley
Chorus:
Wait for the wagon,
Wait for the wagon,
Wait for the wagon,
And we'Il all take a ride.
1. Will you come with me, my Phyllis dear,
To yon blue mountain free ?
Where the blossoms smell the sweetest,
Come rove along with me.
Chorus:
It's every Sunday morning,
When I am by your side,
We'll jump into the wagon
And all take a ride.
Chorus:
2. Where the river runs like silver
And the birds they sing so sweet,
I have a cabin, Phyllis,
And something good to eat;
Come listen to my story,
It will relieve my heart;
So jump into the wagon,
And off we will start.
Chorus:
3. Do you believe, my Phyllis, dear,
Old Mike, with all this wealth,
Can make you half so happy
As I, with youth and health?
We'Il have a little farm,
A horse, a pig and a cow;
And you will mind the dairy,
While I do guide the plough.
Chorus:
4. Your lips are red as poppies,
Your hair so slick and neat,
All braided up with dahlias,
And hollyhocks so sweet.
It's ev'ry Sunday morning,
When I am by your side,
We'Il jump into the wagon,
And all take a ride.
Chorus:
5. Together, on life's journey,
We'll travel till we stop,
And if we have no trouble,
We'll reach the happy top;
Then come with me, sweet Phyllis,
My dear, my lovely bride,
We'Il jump into the wagon,
And all take a ride.
Chorus:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Our wagon's plenty big enough;
It's running gear is good.
'Tis stuffed with cotton round its sides
And made of Southern wood.
Chorus:
Wait for the wagon,
The new Jeff Davis wagon.
The South is our wagon,
And we'll all take a ride.
2. Carolina is the driver,
With Georgia by her side.
Virginia will hold our flag up,
And we'll all take a ride.
Chorus:
Joan, what a great question, I assumed they were built in the East when Judah had to go order them, not sure now!
The "rolling stock" interests me! the locomotives, 42 freight cars, passenger cars..where did they come from? How did they get to the West? Boat? Were they built in the West?) Anybody know?
Harold, thank you for that information on Clipper Ships, I had no idea either there were so many, how did they haul engines and train cars??? You make a great point about the length of time of the sailing, too, something we now take pretty much for granted, like we do the strawberries in the stores in February.
Henry, so Mr. Stanford is the same one who went on to Governor and had Stanford University named after him, but I missed the Durant connection with August Horch, whom I never heard of and actually was almost (but not quite) electrified out of my seat by the Audi connection!!!!!! Jeepers!
Durant and Horch were the engineering brains behind their car companies in the early 20th century. Each man was compelled to leave his company and re-do most of what he had done. Horch, whose name means "listen" in German, cleverly translated his name into Latin, so he could create Audi (people used to ask me how to pronounce it--I would ask them what do they say when they say "listen" in Latin). Amazing, just amazing, how many times once you learn something you see it repeated in other areas. Thank you so much for that.
More....
Ann Alden
February 25, 2001 - 05:52 am
Hi all
I still have a problem with this site. It loads the header, completely, very fast, 2 seconds or less. Then it slows to a halt and just keeps trying to load but never makes it. I have to click on the location bar several times at the end of the URL to get it to load completely. Still happening!
Back to the rail gauge, I wanted to tell you all the story that we read while in London in the early '90's. Seems that when France got done building their side of the Chunnel and England finished their's, they discovered that they didn't have the same track gauge so couldn't hook up. It was a major mess!
Ginny, I have that other book being held at the library and I will pick it up today. See ya later!
Ginny
February 25, 2001 - 05:59 am
I'd like to look at Mr. Judah a minute, I can't get the bouncy optimistic Wait for the Wagon and we'll all take a ride and the sort of.....energetic premise it promises with the reality of what happened to Judah out of my mind.
From all of you who have commented on him, it would seem that none of you think it was, in fact, his railroad?
Henry, you say there are parallels and you're not surprised the moneybags steamrollered him.
And Joan, you say that maybe we should even ask the question what does it mean whose railroad IS it? The question of who would have built it in the future when most agree he was the only one who could have gotten it thru Congress is interesting.
I have no doubt that a railroad would eventually have been built without Judah, but where and when?
He just wasn't any match ~ the sheer size of the project, once set in motion, fueled by the profit motives of so many! The steamroller! The elephant!
Now Faith mentioned that perpaps Judah might have been treated fairly, after all: In the long run I do not think Judah was treated wrongly.
I must admit, when I read about the Fabulous Four, that they did seem to have divided their workload very effeciently. So it might seem to them that Judah was simply claiming more than his due, they parted with their hard earned and very prized money too, they too went out on a limb.
The sticking point seemed to be the deference he felt he was entitled to.
I'm not so sure he wasn't?
Let's keep looking at your thoughts:
By the same token, Judah went to New York to find a new "angel" to buy the CP and get rid of the Big 4 influence altogether. It was time for Judah and the Big 4 to go their separate ways. And they surely did.
Losalbern, do you mean that you thought that he was going to attempt a coup when he knew their resources were at an ebb?
You said, It would appear that they thought of Judah as just a highly paid engineer, not necessarily part of the managemant team.
The Big 4 had financial know how and they needed Judah because he knew how to build a railroad. Judah needed them because they had the up-front money to get the railroad started. Judah thought they were cheating somehow but I dont see where there was much money to abscond with at that stage of the game.
Those are good points, too. So it was a mutual need thing but why did they cut him out of the side road dealings and why would they not give him...why is it not referred to as the Big Five, then?
Can't be just because he died, because they cut him out while living? He couldn't have been much of a threat, I don't understand??
Now Faith thought that he would NOT have succeeded, even IF he had gotten Vanderbilt: jUDAH was plotting to get Vanderbilt to bail out the CP and take it over. He never would have and Crocker and Huntington in particular would never have let Eastern money buy them clear out...
Do you agree with that??
The question of ownership is an interesting thing, to me. Who does a bright idea really belong to, the person who creates it, the person who has the money to fund it, or the person who makes it work? That has always interested me, what would you say? It appears Judah fully intended, and I have no doubt he could succeed, in raising money himself and running it himself???
Never have seen such determination, and, I, too, am glad he's remembered in the name of a school. The things we learn from reading!!!
Ann, I also noticed the mentioning continually of the Civil War is being fought, and wondered how they could concentrate, the only thing I can think of is that the war was a bit far removed from CA and even Omaha, so they were more free? to concentrate on their own projects? I may be totally wrong here, being no US Historian?
Anybody??
Willie: These are great points:
So the CP lost about half the value of the money received since the conversion to gold was at about 57cents on the dollar. Now I would never have known that and the bit about CA requiring cash or gold is fascinating.
Also who mentioned (have the quote but the author of the quote has escaped my clipboard) that metals should have been scarce, and that's so, too???
Faith, I wish you WOULD be hypnotized, hahahaa we would love to hear those old memories, I bet they could really tell us things about these very subjects.
On page 188 we see at the bottom that the rails were "spiked....in...with their heavy sledgehammers--three blows to a spike---and [they] connected the ends with a fishplate."
Does anybody know what a fishplate is?
LOL, Losalbern on the reading, I too, have no earthly idea on some of these sites what they are talking about, but they seem to know, and it's fascinating to learn whatever we can.
"Anna, what cannot I do in New York now? I have always had to set my brains and will too much against other men's money--now, what I cannot do!"
In a letter to Dr. Strong he said if he were successful in the East, "there will be a radical change in the management of the railaord and it will pass into the hands of men of expreience and capital," unlike the corrupt and incompetent men then in charge.
If he failed he warned, the Big Four would "rue the day they ever embarked on the Pacific Railroad. (page 184)
If they treat me well...they may expect similar treatment at my hands. If not, I am able to play my hand."
He expected to return from New York with Vanterbilt and others in his party.
It looks to me like this is an American Tragedy. One wonders what has caused this and one would like to know more about Judah. For instance, the man whose honeyed words moved Congress, whose lobbying got the thing rolling in the first place, apparently failed at dealing with the Big Four. Why?
Is it their fault? Some of you don't think so. Is it his fault? Nobody yet has said. Does it matter? I think it does.
What's the saying, those who don't understand history are condemned to repeat it?
Are any of you more conversant with the life of Judah? Is there any other biography of him we might consult, or do we need to take Abrose's perspective here? What IS Ambrose's perspective? Have any of you read the other text suggested by Dr. Winter??
I have received American Notes in the mail, by the way, and am enjoying Mr. Kipling's very slanted but very well written views of the American West.
What do you think about any of the above points or anything else in this chapter, which, to me, is overcome with Mr. Judah's failure.
ginny
Ginny
February 25, 2001 - 06:02 am
Ann, thank you for that report on the loading and thank you all for the same, there have been some problems with Internal Server errors and if the heading is loading OK (I myself had to hit refresh and have to go out and get on AOL to get back in) then we can leave the heading if not a problem.
Don't want our enticing stuff to slow you all down, tho, so thanks, All, for the news.
Ann, hopefully it's indexed and if it mentions Judah how about tell us what it says there (and if we want to read it, too)....
thanks!
PS: Tell me something, Historians? What is the most important thing about history? Is it knowing that something happened or why it happened or what caused it to happen? Do you need to know all three, can you ever know all three and how important is it to try?
PPS: Faith, thank you for that fascinating information on Folsom and the gravel which might have contained gold! Amazing, I'm still back there struggling with trying to understand grade? See the photo above? What have they done to the land to make that area under the tracks (grade??) puff UP like that?
I'm still back there! hahahaha
Harold Arnold
February 25, 2001 - 08:15 am
From Ginny
PS: Tell me something, Historians? What is the most important thing about history? Is it knowing that something happened or why it happened or what caused it to happen? Do you need to know all three, can you ever know all three and how important is it to try?
I would most certainly defer to Henry and others in answering Ginny's question stated in message #335, but will advance the following comment. I think the last two are the essentials, and in fact are really the restatement of each other. If one has an idea why an event occurred or put in other words, what caused it, he/she should have a pretty good idea that it did occur. But I guess knowing an event happened with out any idea of its causes or reasons, is better than complete ignorance.
Finally causes and reasons are not always apparent. Most often there are multiple causes. They have a way of being a complex maze whose interpretation is subject to the background and prejudices of group or individual interpretations
losalbern
February 25, 2001 - 03:08 pm
Ginny.. Earlier you had posed a question about "rolling stock", where it came from and how did it get to where it was needed. In the case of CP, Ambrose pointed out on page 115, Chapter 5, that at that point in time when Judah and Anna were aboard ship heading for New York for a meeting with Vanderbilt regarding the prospect of his purchase of the CP railroad, their ship passed the vessel "Herald of The Morning" heading north after leaving New York months earlier with a cargo of rails and the first CP locomotive, etc. So, most all that CP early rolling stock was made back East and shipped around the horn to Sacramento.
Then on your question of who really owns the finished product, the guy with the good idea or the people who put up the money to manufacture and market it? Usually it is a joint venture with a lot of money to be made by everyone if the product sells. There are a lot of "venture Capitalists" around today just looking for a guy with a great idea that needs promoting. Perhaps the big 4 originally thought of themselves as people with "Venture Capital" but building a rairoad almost cleaned them out to where they had to borrow funds to keep going. Personally, I think the CP came close to going broke before it got out of the Sierras. Question to Henry.. Was Durant the same guy who made the Durant automobile?
williewoody
February 25, 2001 - 04:35 pm
GINNY: Before I go any further I must say that I am having increasing difficulty getting into "Nothing Like It In The World." And going from page to page is even worse. I'm no computer expert but does that humongous heading have anything to do with it? I don't seem to have this problem anywhere else in SN.
Now to what I wanted to post. Somewhere back there I recall that I did mention that the CP had a bigger financial problem because they had to ship all their equipment, rolling stock, rails spikes and other supplies by ship around the Horn. On some occasions they did take a short cut across Panama. But there was no practical way to get across the continent until the UP finally got connected up with them in Utah.
I find it humorous that the modern day wonders who built the "Chunnel" didn't even have the sense to be sure they were using the same gauge track on either side of the channel.
Now to answer someones question about what is a fishplate. Actually a rail joiner is a better name for it and one that is used in model railroading. Each rail has two holes drilled in the side of the rail at each end. A metal plate with corresponding sets of holes is placed on each side of the rail end and bolts and nuts are inserted to secure the rail ends together. Why these were called fishplates I will never understand. These days rail ends are welded together
As a humorous side story. I have been a model railroader most of my life. One time a few years ago I went into a hobby shop to get some supplies. I knew the clerk pretty well. At least well enough to know that he was relatively new to model railroading, so when I told him I wanted some fishplates I chuckled when he started out somewhere to look for them. I quickly educated him that they were rail joiners, which he understood.
Ginny
February 25, 2001 - 04:47 pm
Ok try it now, Willie, I took out the photo (sob!) of Doc Durant at the end of the line and also took out the two photos of the trains showing the configurations because I see that Pat W has put in a wonderful html page of configurations of locomotives, I wish you all would go look at what she's done!
Now how does it load????
Thank you for the fishplate, and also Losalbern, you are totally right about the ships passing, I do remember that now: great close reading!! Imagine the ship which could transport a locomotive, cast your mind back over the big sailing ships you have seen, I'd like to know how they fit it on!
Now how does it load??? You know we're getting many Internal Server Error messages if you follow the Problems section on the main menu of SeniorNet. We need to make sure it's the heading itself and not something else, how about everybody try and see if it's better??
Thanks!
ginny
Ann Alden
February 25, 2001 - 11:54 pm
Well, I loaded on the first try this morning so we can hope that you have fixed it, Ginny!
I looked into finding more on Judah in the "Empire Builders" book and they pretty much say the same thing that Ambrose says about Judah. The author comments that there is no written record as to what Judah intended to do. Just hints from his letters to others that he was planning to take over the railroad.
Having been acquainted with people like Judah, I would say that he became obsessed with his railroad and when things didn't go the way he expected them to go, he wanted the people who were not doing things the way that he thought they should be done, to leave, to get out of the RR business. Of course, they were trying to make a killing in building the roads and charging a toll to use them plus starting the Credit Moblier but they did use their own money down to the last penny. Venture capitolists, they were and, not the first.
Did you know that Whitney, from the East, was related to the inventor of the cotton gin. Fifth cousins, no less.
Ginny
February 26, 2001 - 06:20 am
Get outta here, Whitney!!
Obsessed, did you say? Hmmm. I wonder if that's a common trait of creators of something. For instance, check out Bill Gates, would you say he's obsessed, that's fascinating.
Now Losalbern mentions the sacrifice that the Big Four made and they almost went bankrupt, and again, here, we have sacrifice of another type. But the Big Four pushed Judah OUT and relegated him to a...well...did I read correctly, the position of employee? So he should have been content with enough and deference was not his due???
So money talks...what's the saying...something ...talks and something else walks?
Harold, that was beautiful and I wonder how the rest of you feel about that? I think my own problems as a student of history come from my lack of unnderstanding the very things Harold says, and I loved that knowing the facts is better than nothing. I guess that's the explanation for most of the history texts today??
More more....
OH I did again fool with the heading? You will find all the Topics for this week in a clickable?? Pat W is working on the colored bands, getting them smaller and when she and I are through, you may see a difference?
Quite frankly, it loads so fast for me now I can't make the heading still long enough to even click ON the topics, how does it look now??
more....
Ginny
February 26, 2001 - 06:39 am
Williewoody, thanks again for that fishplate, trying to find photo of same, and your mention of model railroading. I have found the article I saved and so here is
Don Saager, a model train enthusiast, who has built a steam engine 1/8 true size. He belongs to a group called the
Mid South Live Steamers who put on several gatherings per year, and whose engines (keep in mind this is on
7 inch tracks),
Realistic 1/8 steam engines look almost real.
And here is a link to the
National Model Railroad Association for those interested, are there any other links you all know of that might be interesting here?
And as long as we are sharing photos of model trains (do you all have any personal ones you can send me? Just send them in email and I'll put them up here?)
Here's one I would like to share with you, I found it in a Senior Citizens Pro Bono craft shop in a new mall once. It is hand carved out of various cedar woods, the wheels turn, the cars hook together and it is easily propelled across the floor. I regret that this photo is at an angle, because it seems to be passing thru the bookcase in real life, the engine is more than a foot and a half long:
Carved from cedar Neat, hah?
Joan P mentioned cowcatchers a while back and here is some more information on them with an illustration seeming to say it was buffalo they were pushing aside, hahahaha
Cowcatchers The Eyewitness book says,
The absence of fences along many of the early tracks made it essential to protect the front of a locomotive, which could easily be derailed by large animals such as buffalo. A cowcatcher pushed the animal aside. With the help of bells, whistles, and large headlights, collisions were kept to a minimum.
You would think the very spectre of a chuffing monster would accomplish that, wouldn't you?
Also earlier we spoke of horses running and trains and I know you all know the Tom Thumb story:
Tom Thumb and the horse race
In 1830, Tom Thumb, a small experimental locomotive, made its first run on the 13 mile completed section of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. Tom Thumb also entered into a celebrated race, seen in this illustration, with a horse-drawn train. The horse won.
Must have been....hard on the horse, the illustration shows him tiptoeing amongst the ties...????
hahahaha
Anyway, the early days of railroading continue to fascinate me, how about YOU??
Let's hear from you?
ginny
Henry Misbach
February 26, 2001 - 12:34 pm
Ginny, I would say yes, yes, and yes. Thucydides was certain, he says, that nothing in the Greek experience would compare to the then-impending war between Athens and Sparta. But much of what we read today involves events that, frankly, don't weigh nearly as much.
Now, of course, taking that perspective, I must say that some of the details of how the East-West railroad came about don't matter much to me. If some of the details of the financial derring-do seem abstruse, I wouldn't worry about it. Obviously the risks were enormous, as they always are in a project that will not pay immediately.
In looking at some earlier works where the railroad was an ancillary issue, I find that the identification of the Big Four by Ambrose is nothing new. But the enhancement of Judah's role, both by assertion of fact and by expansion of his part of the story, is fairly new. At least Stephen Birmingham in his book of 1980 entitled "California Rich," has much less to say about him. So, evidently, that was the traditional view. Birmingham's book might be a helpful adjunct to Ambrose, because you can see it all in a slightly different perspective. Also, he brings out more naturally the tendency of the people involved not to leave much of a paper trail of their doings which, if not illegal, had a necessary exclusivity that tends to wipe away any tracks for historians to follow. Birmingham does a good job of explaining the reticence of descendents about their forebears as well as their current circumstances.
Nope, the Durant I mentioned lived in the early 1900's and basically founded GM.
FaithP
February 26, 2001 - 01:00 pm
Ginny as I said way back in the original posts, history really kind of ignored the doings of Judah until recently. So much was made in California and especially here in the valley schools about the big four and every year we studied some new part of California hx and always Gov. Stanford the locamotive governer, was mentioned and always Crocker and Huntington Not so much Hopkins though he put a lot into the financial endevour. Judah is to be commended for his work establishing the Sierra route. Without him, another route would have emerged, possible less expensive to construct but less useful to enriching the Valley. San Francisco is not a viable place for an international railroad to start over the Sierra, anywhere in Northern California is better and they all knew it. This is a geological fact because of the lay of the land and the earthquakes etc. Stockton or Roseville were better starting points. But Judah needed the money and the money was in Sacramento on K street. My personal opinion is that Judah lost it when he had the arguments with Huntington who was not very deferential to him, and Judah was very upset at the seeming indifference of the money backers to his engeneering skills so his ego was hurt and he decided to knock their blocks off so to speak with Vanderbilt. Sadly, for Anna, he became ill and died so we will never know the outcome. I will now let Judah rest in peace. Fp
FaithP
February 26, 2001 - 06:40 pm
It occured to me in rereading a portion of chapter 5 that when Lincoln appointed Grant General of all the northern armies that I had read a book or seen a movie that included that action along with an extensive exploration of Lincoln and Grant seeing that the Railroad would get built and with as much help as they could get from congress, as the gold needed to win the war was in California and Nevada. They had to have the railroad and the transportation of the manpower to the mines and the gold shipments back to the eastern coffers and Federal Government. Now some how the Family(my railroading uncles)talked a lot about the Virginia City Line being very important as it hauled ore both silver and gold,from the mines to the mills. I do not remember if it was just family telling it or a history book or what but it is right there in all the dealings Lincoln had with Dodge, then Judah, and Dodge with Grant. I am going on another research trip and hope I find some thing interesting on this topic. Faith
Ann Alden
February 27, 2001 - 02:14 am
Ginny,
Did you make a change to the heading? Again, today, I am having trouble loading this site. Long delays or just not loading past the header without reload or clicking on the location. Wha hoppened?
I still stick with my view of Judah of being obsessed with "his railroad". So what, if he was obsessed, it doesn't make any difference because he had the good of the railroad building in his mind. When someone like that is "stonewalled", as he was, they often think their project is going to go down the tubes if they don't make a change in the management.
Ginny
February 27, 2001 - 05:05 am
Henry, yes, yes, and yes, huh? Then I guess the amateur historian has a fourth thing to do as you point out and that's be selective as to what does matter, to have the overview?
That's fascinating about the Stephen Birmingham book for a lot of reasons, I'll see if I can get it, I love Birmingham, and we actually had procured him for one of our Gatherings? Ella wrote him and he very graciously replied his interest in what we were doing, alas he lives near Cleveland and we're not going there. She heard him speak and said he was marvelous.
So they didn't keep much paper trails, well, I can understand that, too. Doesn't it make you want to research this part, tho? It does me.
And thank you, Faith, for that background about the role of the War in the building of the railroad, we will be fantastically interested in what you can unearth. I feel quite on the cutting edge here since Judah was ignored so long in history, or Ambrose is on the cutting edge and he's dragged us with him.
Ann, yes, I have almost eliminated the heading so I fear it's NOT the heading this time but some other problem? The heading here is almost nothing and even so Pat W will replace it today with one with smaller colorful bands. Short of eradicating it altogether, I fear we've done all we can, it's another problem somewhere else along the line.
Am disappointed to learn that The Empire Builders does not shed more light on his intents, thank you for that research!
I am interested in your assessment of Judah, I do apologize for taking up your time with this, Guys, but I wish to learn from history and Judah here. You said, Ann,
I still stick with my view of Judah of being obsessed with "his railroad". So what, if he was obsessed, it doesn't make any difference because he had the good of the railroad building in his mind. When someone like that is "stonewalled", as he was, they often think their project is going to go down the tubes if they don't make a change in the management.
What I would like to know from everyone present today is
what lesson can we learn from Judah here? I would like to learn a lesson, what lesson do you think I should learn?
Here is Mr. Judah's actual proposal for the railroad, isn't this something else?
In his own words: Theodore Judah and the Dream ginny
FaithP
February 27, 2001 - 01:34 pm
Ginny I am very glad to have read the proposal in Judahs own woards. He says it all right there doesnt he and also shows his deep and basic understanding of the problems and how to solve them. Then he did solve the first problems. It is a sad fact of human nature that he was so angered by the method of Crocker and Huntington in just taking over and making decisions about his railroad and the effrontry to start the railroad at a site they describe as the beginning of the foothills when it was on the eluvial plain, really made him angry didnt it.Egoism, Stubborness, Pride, standing in the way of good judgement, communication, reasonablenessis that a word).. Perhaps this is a lesson to learn Ginny, that we can all think over. I don't exactlyknow how to state the Lesson. Some one Will. FP
losalbern
February 27, 2001 - 04:41 pm
It is hard to say what lesson is to be learned from Judah's demise, Ginny. Perhaps something like, "when money talks, it pays to listen." Or this; "Management may be wrong in their collective judgement but they are still management." Judah was not the first nor will he be the last to incur the wrath of the people he worked for. And he did work for them; not the other way around.
Joan Pearson
February 28, 2001 - 04:39 am
Thanks so much for that link to Judah's plan for the railroad, Ginny. No wonder he was able to persuade Lincoln, Congress, the Sacramento moneybags and the people that the railroad could and should be built along the northern route. It was so clearly and simply presented...looks like the clear, direct report of an engineer, doesn't it? Complicated material, clearly presented! Thanks for that.
No wonder the poor man went to pieces when money took over and directed "his" railway. To think that he died before the first track was laid...and the irony of passing the ship carrying the locomotive named after him on his final voyage east. 19 tons it was! Now to compare that to the weight of the modern locomotive that blew over in Texas a few weeks ago, we'll have answered one of those nagging questions...
Judah died from yellow fever at the young age of 37...didn't the doctor say that because he was overworked, he fell victim to the fever? So he worried himself to death..consumed with his obsession.
The lesson? I find I'm taking this very personal. The lesson seems to me...even if it kills you, if you believe in something, go all the way with it. Now I'm reading that and see the flaws, but still think that Judah had no other choice than to do all he could to "save" his dream which he thought was in danger.
I love all the photos of the railway in progress and wondered how this came about that such photos were taken at the time. Another question answered in this chapter...Alfred Hart was hired to do just that! And what magnificent photographs he took!
Joan Pearson
February 28, 2001 - 04:51 am
Thanks so much for that link to Judah's plan for the railroad, Ginny. No wonder he was able to persuade Lincoln, Congress, the Sacramento moneybags and the people that the railroad could and should be built along the northern route. It was so clearly and simply presented...looks like the clear, direct report of an engineer, doesn't it? Complicated material, clearly presented! Thanks for that.
No wonder the poor man went to pieces when money took over and directed "his" railway. To think that he died before the first track was laid...and the irony of passing the ship carrying the locomotive named after him on his final voyage east. 19 tons it was! Now to compare that to the weight of the modern locomotive that blew over in Texas a few weeks ago, we'll have answered one of those nagging questions...
Judah died from yellow fever at the young age of 37...didn't the doctor say that because he was overworked, he fell victim to the fever? So he worried himself to death..consumed with his obsession.
The lesson? I find I'm taking this very personal. The lesson seems to me...even if it kills you, if you believe in something, go all the way with it. Now I'm reading that and see the flaws, but still think that Judah had no other choice than to do all he could to "save" his dream which he thought was in danger.
I love all the photos of the railway in progress and wondered how this came about that such photos were taken at the time.
Another question answered in this chapter...Alfred Hart was hired to do just that!Good move, Governor Stanford! And what magnificent photographs he took!
Alfred A. Hart
williewoody
February 28, 2001 - 08:03 am
GINNY OR JOAN OR WHOMEVER: I must apologize for not thanking you all sooner. I still don't know how you ascertained our anniversary, but we do appreciate your greeting. It has been so long ago it almost seems we can't remember ourselves. Anyway a lot of water has run over the dam. Thanks so much!.
losalbern
February 28, 2001 - 01:45 pm
Joan, that is a very interesting clickable you gave us about the photographer Alfred Hart. How lucky we are to have an access to those historic days via his pictures. I haven't seen them all because I want to go back several times to enjoy them leisurely. It was especially interesting to see Mr Hart's sillouette from his shadow and that of his camera gear in the lower left corner of photo # 23. Nice going, Joan!
losalbern
February 28, 2001 - 02:02 pm
It is no disgrace to admit my lack of understanding regarding the nomenclature of locomotives, therefor I have yet another pothole of ignorance that needs filling. Can one of our many experts explain the nature and need for that bell (or hump) shaped object, sometimes one or sometimes two of them, that rests on the very top of the locomotive? Until this forum began, my railroad expertise stopped right at the station's ticket counter and now I have a lust for learning.
FaithP
February 28, 2001 - 08:41 pm
http://www.calliope.org/gold/gold3.html If you go to this site and read it you will understand what we learned so much about in our California and Nevada Schools I attended jr. high in Sparks one winter when I was to ill to stay in at Tahoe and stayed out with relatives. Nevada taught more about the role of the Civil War in their rush to Statehood and Lincolns assistance in the Railroad than even California did. We got it in history and geography and social science and civics heheheh I guess it simplfied the lesson plans. Dont all you teachers throw chalk at me now. Faith
williewoody
March 1, 2001 - 04:12 pm
LOSALBERN: Everbody seems to think I am an expert on railroads etc. But I hasten to say I almost flunked chemistry and Physics in high school. Which is why I chose a career as far from those fields as I could find. So when I saw your question about the "humps" on top of the steam locomotives I knew I had to seek outside help. It so happens my son-in-law has some degree of expertise in engineering. So as best as I can translate from his explanation here goes..... The steam engine builds up steam which in turn creates pressure. As much as I can understand the dome allows for increased pressure to be built up which in turn gives the locomotive more power.
If there is anyone out there who can explain it better, or if I am way off base, please speak up. Like I say I am an accountant (bean counter) as my son-in-law says, so there you have it.
losalbern
March 1, 2001 - 05:51 pm
A friend loaned me an old paper back entitled "The Big Four" by Oscar Lewis. After reading the chapters about Judah and his relationship with the 4, I have concluded that I was incorrect to give the 4 too much credit for the development of the CP line. They were driven by profit motive where Judah's obsession dealt mainly with the good of the nation. To quote Mr. Lewis, in telling of Judah's meeting with his backer's to be, "in later life, four of his listeners accepted easily the roles of men of vision, who perceived a matchless opportunity and grasped it with courage. It was a role none of them deserved". That is pretty straight forward, isn't it? What a pity that they gave such little recognition to the man who was the main force in the success of the CP.
Henry Misbach
March 1, 2001 - 06:24 pm
Ginny, you got exactly the point I was driving at. Your paraphrase of what I said is better than what I said.
Thank you Faith P. for your Out-West perspective. I've tried to say that it was what we needed. No question but that it was to the benefit of Lincoln and the Union cause to link the industrial East with the mining wealth of the far West.
We should never forget how much harder it was to build a railroad then than it would be today. If Lincoln could have invented a better showcase for the raw power of wage-earning labor, compared to anything done by slave labor, nothing in the US then could have touched it. Seems to me Ambrose says, although they paid little to the workers, they paid in specie and not in scrip.
That Kansas City book I've talked about before shows the massive earth-moving that was necessary to put it in final form. And even then, if you suppose KC to be flat, let us start on Main and go up 10th street. We'll let you use a manual shift and see if you can stop and restart without rolling backward at least one inch. To do all that with shovels and horse-drawn wagons boggles the mind.
Hey, Losalbern, you can change your mind only if it's working.
FaithP
March 1, 2001 - 10:03 pm
Losolbern changing their mind about Judah is what I think everyone did as the nation aged into the 40's and more people studied the story of Judah and "his" railroad. That is why after being lost in the glory given to the big 4 he was finally given his due and the School and Street naming along with telling his story more fully helped secure him a good name in history. Still it is a something I believe that he could not have finished that railroad himself without the greedy men who made it work. Henry I think you did try to say something about Lincoln and his need to get that road going. And even our friend Ambrose hasnt said a lot about the Nevada mining connection. I am rereading chapters six and being reminded of the great part Gen. Dodge is playing in this Drama FP
Ginny
March 2, 2001 - 05:31 am
Well a bright good morning to everybody as we begin Chapter 6 today and what a delight to find you all talking to the others here.
I don't know about you, but this book, tho perhaps NOT the most exciting one I ever read, has sort of awakened in me a new interest, not only in history but in things in general here, and I attribute that entirely to you all and your wealth of backgrounds shared here, I would NEVER have read this book by myself and now I find I'm fascinated by the subject, and MORE....am learning, never something to discount at my tender age! hahahaha
Thank you all for your ideas on the lessons we may learn from Mr. Judah and the Big Four: FaithP mentioned "Egoism, Stubborness, Pride, standing in the way of good judgement, communication,".. losalbern mentioned "And he did work for them; not the other way around,: good points, both of you....Joan P mentioned "The lesson seems to me...even if it kills you, if you believe in something, go all the way with it," and I saw something in another discussion the other day, that I think really speaks to this issue.
In the
Renato's Luck discussion the author wrote, about his own creation of a book:
Often the big surprise that happens when producing something is that what you had planned to make the focal point of the entire work becomes altogether marginal. It takes a funny kind of brave humility to take a backseat and let the work proceed in its own direction. ---Jeff Shapiro
THAT to me, is the crux of the matter, and it fits in with each of your thoughts, he simply could not take the backseat, being the creator of the thing and passionate about it. You know what, I understand that.
Williewoody, you are welcome, what an accomplishment! And thank you for answering Losalberns excellent question on the hump on the engine, aren't we learning a LOT here?
I am.
Faith thank you for that marvelous site on the Comstock Lode and the Transcontinental RR, that's another entire perspective as Henry noted, and of course as I would never have known.
losalbern, thank you for saying this,
A friend loaned me an old paper back entitled "The Big Four" by Oscar Lewis. After reading the chapters about Judah and his relationship with the 4, I have concluded that I was incorrect to give the 4 too much credit for the development of the CP line. They were driven by profit motive where Judah's obsession dealt mainly with the good of the nation.
more.....
You can change your mind again, if you like, that's part of learning!!
Ginny
March 2, 2001 - 05:42 am
Henry, if I have managed to grasp an historical understanding, it is a first and will never be repeated! hahahaha
What an interesting thought:
If Lincoln could have invented a better showcase for the raw power of wage-earning labor, compared to anything done by slave labor, nothing in the US then could have touched it.
Thank you for that one.
Faith, I am not sure I agree that Judah could not have finished it himself, I do agree he needed financial backing but the Vanderbilts might have provided more than the Big Four could ever have thought of. I mean, he, even then, all the Vanderbilts (think of Biltmore House , Henry have you been there yet?) was a major player while the Big Four were, for all their very effecient organization, were still primarily shop keepers and merchants?
Isn't it ironic too, didn't Rockefeller make his wad by being some sort of Railroad Robber Baron?
This morning we take up a ...would you say painful part of American history and Ambrose does it unflinchingly. I have reproduced in the heading a small photo in the book of the American Indian looking at the railroad, that's a very poignant image.
As well in the heading you will find new topics, were you at all surprised by some of the comments in the book? Trespassers? I'm afraid I am not conversant enough with the history of the Indian to know if somebody tried to explain to them that what they considered their own lands was, in fact, owned by the railroad or the government?
Were you struck by the marvelously daunting task facing the surveyors? No maps??
NO maps? I spent a lot of yesterday trying to visualize that. No maps. Imagine yourself setting out to route a train?
Wow.
As well we see here the elements of the grading of the track and we see why it's elevated 2 feet (floods) (you would think a train could go thru a flood, right?)....and we see how the fills were made, but will somebody PLEASE explain to me what a less than 2 percent increment is? In simple language?
What is a 2 percent slope and why was it hard for these hideously powerful locomotives to go up them?
ginny
Ann Alden
March 2, 2001 - 01:45 pm
In Washington, Walt Whitman, a clerk in the Attorney General's office, devoured press
accounts of the unfolding drama and was moved to write his magisterial "Passage to India,"
which included these lines:
I see over my own continent the Pacific railroad surmounting every barrier,
I see continual trains of cars winding along the Platte carrying freight and
passengers,
I hear the locomotives rushing and roaring, and the shrill steam whistle,
I hear the echoes reverberate through the grandest scenery in the world,
I cross the Laramie plains, I note the rock in grotesque shapes, the buttes,
I see the plentiful larkspur and wild onions, the barren, colorless,
sage-deserts . . .
Tying the eastern to the western sea, The road between Europe and Asia.
. . . the Passage to India:
Wonderful comment on the times. Everyone seems to have been so excited by the building of this line and the telegraph kept the people back home in D.C. apprised of every move that was made.
Can you imagine standing on your own property and hearing someone, outside of your family, tell you that you don't own the land, the US government does. Lets see, couldn't that happen to any of us? Eminent domain? Seems the government could have acted in a more civilized way, but they considered the Indian population trespassers here in America. And, they did sign and break many treaties with the Indians. Yes, Ginny, this is a touchy subject.
Isn't the 2 per cent grade the same thing as when you put a roof on a house with a rise? For every foot you go forward, you can only rise so many inches from the flat area? I must ask the engineer in the family.
I tried to read all of the 40 pages put in here by Miss Ginny about Judah but just couldn't get through them. He was so focused and sure of his project that no one was going to stop him, That's what I call real enthusiasm! And doesn't it take that steadfast belief in a project to get it accomplished?
losalbern
March 2, 2001 - 04:17 pm
I have been meaning to ask you myself, Henry, if you have visited the Vanderbilt place there in Ashville. Since Ginny brought it up, now is the time to ask, I guess. What a jaw dropping, gorgeous place ! Makes Hearst Castle look like a museum.
Ann Alden
March 3, 2001 - 08:40 am
Yes, the engineer in my house says that the railroad has always used percentages for their description of the rise allowed in installing track. The 2% refers to going forward 100 feet with the rise being restricted to going 2 feet up. Its an angle thing! Also, the reason for the 2% percent restriction is that when you are going up the wheels can't grip the track with anymore of an angle. The locomotive wheels will begin to spin and then slide backwards and with their weight its impossible for them to get stopped. Does that answer your question, Ginny? I can't always quote these mechanical explanations correctly but I try!
Ginny
March 3, 2001 - 12:22 pm
Ann, thank you so much for the Whitman, it does capture, it does make us see so clearly the excitement, and on top of it, it's another piece of literature, I'm STILL Reading the Kipling, Harold, it's something ELSE!!!!!
Also thank you Ann for the 2 percent rise, my own engineer here and I got into a ....let me see what can we call it, his eyes were rolling, never a good sign, for some reason I seemed to understand you said it could not go up over 2 feet but I believe I have it straight now. Hmpf.
Snort.
Yes, losalbern, that Biltmore House is beyond beyond, and he, of course, was a Vanderbilt and I believe, I may be wrong, that he built his own railroad, just to bring supplies to his own builders. What a shame Judah (not sure here about the dates, Geo. Vanderbilt may have come along after Judah, but boy if there were ANYbody who dreamed he did, he'd have been the perfect partner)!!! Probably missed each other by 100 years. The family still runs that, there was one daughter and she married a Cecil and the Cecils still own it, the daughter does the vineyards or something ...it's very interesting.
As far as eminent domain just THINK of the Interstate systems when they were laid. Boy I remember that, how landowners had whole farms bisected. There's quite a lot of controversy here over a "Connector," which was going up, as well.
Can't WAIT till Monday, have spent ALL day looking for The Rock Island Line because teeth nearly fell out when I looked at the MAP in the book and it shows "The Rock Island Line," of song fame. Not only have I found the song, but I found the lyrics and tons O stuff on the Rock Island Line, and this one is just too good to keep:
Jesse Janes, the Rock Island Line, a Fishplate and the KKK Kinda puts a slightly different slant on the noble Mr. James who "robbed from the rich and gave to the poor," doesn't it????
I really never knew there was SO MUCH to history and now want to know why it's called Rock Island, do any of you know? Seems a strange place for an island??
And I do WISH the doggone maps had longitudes or latitudes on them if they are going to mention same!
Hmpf.
hahahaha
ginny
patwest
March 4, 2001 - 06:58 am
Rock Island is a city (in IL) where the Rock River joins the Mississippi. Not sure where the Rock Island Line starts... but it is still alive and operating: I think as part of the BN/SF line.. It goes through Galesburg north to Rock Island.. I see a lot of coal trains coming out of the Canton area.. and switching of trailers coming from the West coast.
I'll go see if I can find a map.
williewoody
March 4, 2001 - 07:09 am
The full corporate name of the Rock Island is The Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Co. The town of Rock Island is located on the Mississppi River in northern Illinois. It's sister city is Moline, Illinois , which is adjacent to it on the Illinois side of the river. Across the river are the Iowa towns of Davenport and Bettendorf. Today they are referred to as the Quad Cities. Bettendorf takes it's name from the company which produced most of the four wheel trucks used for railcars over the years. The Rock Island went bankrupt many years ago. All of its assets were bought up by other railroads. It happens to be the first railroad train I rode on at the tender age of four, when my mother took me with her shopping in downtown Chicago.
patwest
March 4, 2001 - 07:12 am
So, WillieWoody, where did you get on the 'Rock Line'?
Ann Alden
March 4, 2001 - 01:26 pm
Ginny
You mentioned somewhere back a day or two that there were no maps but in looking at a wonderful book that I stole from my mom, I found some maps for the people who were trying to get to the West and elsewhere. I will include just a piece of one along with some commentary from the mapster, in an email to you. This book is so big, titled "Historical Atlas of the United States" it is published by the National Geographic Society. I need a handcart to carry it around the house and upstairs.
What the 2% means is that as they lay the rails from point A to Point B(based on 100 feet of track and going from left to right), the angle of the track rise from A to B cannot be more than 2%. Its a reverse right triangle with the 90 degree corner being on your right. Have I confused you some more? LOL!
Having visited both the Biltmore and Hearst Castle several times, I found the Hearst Castle the more interesting but the grounds that the Biltmore sits with the gardens are just too gorgeous. That whole area of North Carolina is special! Can't wait to return for a visit on our way thru to Fripp Island.
Harold Arnold
March 4, 2001 - 04:41 pm
What a difference 150 years makes! Do you realize that the entire route from Omaha to Sacramento could be laid out in an office from topographic maps? As early as the 1940's such topographic maps were becoming available through the use of aerial photographs. Today these maps are made from satellite pictures. Today I think the layout would be an office project with field survey staking out the route shortly before construction began. I suspect that today the layout of a Railroad across the face of Mars is possible. Of course building is something else again.
Another way of expressing the meaning of a 2% grade is that it is a 2-foot rise in elevation for each 100 feet of length. A 5 % grade would be a 5-foot rise in elevation in every 100 feet lf length. If my memory of trigonometry is correct this is the tangent function defined as the length of the opposite side divided by the length of the adjacent side. In the 2% example the opposite side is 2 feet, the adjacent side is 100 feet. Tangent = 2/100 = 0.20000 or 2%
I have been tied up on a work project that has left me with no time to do the re-reading required for participation this last week. While my schedule is not exactly clear, I think the coming week leaves me a bit more time and I hope to be more active.
Ann Alden
March 5, 2001 - 05:44 am
I explained it backwards!!! Ugh!! I always see things that way!! Must be dislectic!! Oh well, Harold your explanation is perfect. Sounds like my husband's! :<)
Ginny,
If you copy the picture that I sent you of the map leave the writing in,(if you can read it) as it explains the map and the times the people were living in pretty well.
Did anyone else use the links from the site that Ginny gave us about the Rock Island Line? The owner of the site is a real train buff and goes to all train get togethers and photographs them. What a collection! Much fun to peruse!!
williewoody
March 5, 2001 - 06:45 am
PAT: Just a local trip. We lived in Auburn Park ( near 79th and Halsted streets) In later years after I was married we lived in Joliet, Il. for a few years and I commuted to Chicago on the Rock Island Commuter service which began in Joliet. All of my long distance travel in the days before WWII was on the Santa Fe, Milwaukee Rd, the Burlington, and the Chicago Indianapolis and Louisville (Monon).
losalbern
March 5, 2001 - 05:11 pm
Ann, your explanation of the 2% rise situation sounded just fine to me. Now you say you explained it backwards? Hm. Is it any wonder that guys like me and Williewoody shied away from all those mathematics classes? Harold, the only tangent I know about is what I manage to go off on sometimes when I try to explain something. Its a good thing I didn't manage to become an engineer. Might of hurt somebody just using the wrong tangent.
Henry Misbach
March 5, 2001 - 06:24 pm
Yes, Losalbern, I have been to Biltmore House. It's been about ten years since my last visit there. I'd say it's a matter of taste between it and Hearst Castle, which lacks nothing in opulence. If you have a weakness for things 19th century and earlier, you'll prefer Biltmore.
The only thing I know for sure about a 2% grade is: it's steeper than you think. How's that for total innumeracy?
losalbern
March 6, 2001 - 09:24 am
I had just written my most serious message of several days but when I went to post it I received a Internal Server Error and it went nowhere. I will try to reconstruct. I found that Chapter 6 contained some thought provoking incidents, namely that of the hostile Indian attacks on both settlers and railroad personnel. It is hard to determine here who was the "trespasser." For centuries, the Indian Tribes found it necessary to be territorial oriented in order to survive. Now, day by day, they could see the influx of the white civilization and culture threatening their lifestyle and existence. They were fighting back and taking no prisoners. You have to admire the courage of the advance parties of the railroads out there on the hostile prairie alone with little protection. And then consider the courage of a settler trying to homestead a small piece of land that periodically housed a roving band of Indians. This whole scene is difficult to imagine from our modern day, protected point of view. Our forefathers had a lot of guts.
losalbern
March 6, 2001 - 09:29 am
As an aside to my posting problem this morning and the "Internal Server Error" that was somehow corrected, on the last essage from those folks, I noted that the message came from " APACHE/1.3.12 SERVER" Hm. No offense intended folks.
Ginny
March 6, 2001 - 02:49 pm
hahhaa, Losalbern, hahahaah !
Well a day late and a dollar short but here here here bringing tons O stuff in my bag. First what Ann sent and the Rock Island Line stuff and then back to YOU all and your comments!
Here is a very short clip of Johnny Cash (again!!) singing Rock Island Line:
Johnny Cash briefly sings about the Rock Island Line
Here are the lyrics which may be familiar:
ROCK ISLAND LINE
(Huddie Ledbetter)
JOHNNY CASH (Sun, recorded 1957)
Now this here is the story about the Rock Island Line
Well, the Rock Island Line she runs down into New Orleans
There's a big toll-gate down there
And you know when you got certain things on board
When you go through the toll-gate
Well, you don't have to pay the man no toll
Well, a traindriver, he pulled up to the toll-gate
And the man hollered nicely what all he had on board
And he said:
I got live stock, I got live stock
I got cows, I got pigs, I got sheep
I got mules, I got all live stock
Well, they said, you're all right boy
You don't have to pay no toll
You just go right on through
So, he went on through the toll-gate
And as he went through...
He started pickin' up a little bit of speed
Pickin' up a little bit of steam
He got on through and he turned to look back at the man
And he said:
Well, I fooled you, I fooled you
I got pig iron, I got pig iron
I got all pig iron
Down the Rock Island Line, she's a might good road
Rock Island Line it's the road to ride
Rock Island Line is a mighty good road
Well if you ride it you gotta ride it like you find it
Get your ticket at the station for the Rock Island Line
Oh, cloudy in the west and it looks like rain
Around the curve comes a passenger train
Northbound train on a southbound track
He's already leaving, but he won't be back
Well the Rock Island Line, she's a might good road
Rock Island Line it's the road to ride
Rock Island Line is a mighty good road
Well if you ride it you gotta ride it like you find it
Get your ticket at the station for the Rock Island Line
Oh, I may be right and I may be wrong
But you're gonna miss me when I'm gone
Well the engineer said before he died
There are two more drinks that he'd like to try
The doctor said, what could they be
A hot cup of coffee and a cold glass of tea
Well the Rock Island Line, she's a might good road
Rock Island Line it's the road to ride
Rock Island Line is a mighty good road
Well if you ride it you gotta ride it like you find it
Get your ticket at the station for the Rock Island Line
(Original blues version by LEADBELLY (Capitol 15628, 1949)
And here is a site which tells the history of the Rock Island Line
(Don't suppose anybody happens to know who Huddie Ledbetter is?)
More....
Ginny
March 6, 2001 - 03:33 pm
Ann Alden has shared with us a treasure from a true TOME in her own home, this wonderful map and text of the "Emigrant Road" out west. I have first done an image of the top of the page, it's just too good to miss (it will be slow but give it time, it's worth it)....
Text for Map of Route West Here is the map itself:
Map of the Way West for Travelers And here is the description of how to travel it, typed in by Ann:
"Brief practical advice" offered to emigrants with T.H. Jefferson's
1849 map of the Emigrant Road could be summarized:
"Travel light,
travel resolutely, travel in small groups.
Pioneers should use pack
mules or wagons.
Large parties afforded "Mutual Protection from
Indians" but increased risks from disease, dust and dissension.
"The
journey...is attended with some hardships and privation--nothing,
however, but that can be overcome by those of stout heart and good
constitution."
Explorer and pathfinder, John Charles Fremont traveled 20,000 miles in
the American West. The belief that settlement would "make the Pacific
Ocean the western boundary of the United States" led Fremont to blaze,
map, and popularize emigrant trails to California and Oregon.
Isn't that fabulous, and just about what you need today for a journey, no? hahahah
Thanks so much, ANN!
ginny
Ginny
March 6, 2001 - 03:46 pm
hahhaa, Losalbern, hahahaah !
Well a day late and a dollar short but here here here bringing tons O stuff in my bag. First what Ann sent and the Rock Island Line stuff and then back to YOU all and your comments!
Here is a very short clip of Johnny Cash (again!!) singing Rock Island Line:
Johnny Cash briefly sings about the Rock Island Line
Here are the lyrics which may be familiar:
ROCK ISLAND LINE
(Huddie Ledbetter)
JOHNNY CASH (Sun, recorded 1957)
Now this here is the story about the Rock Island Line
Well, the Rock Island Line she runs down into New Orleans
There's a big toll-gate down there
And you know when you got certain things on board
When you go through the toll-gate
Well, you don't have to pay the man no toll
Well, a traindriver, he pulled up to the toll-gate
And the man hollered nicely what all he had on board
And he said:
I got live stock, I got live stock
I got cows, I got pigs, I got sheep
I got mules, I got all live stock
Well, they said, you're all right boy
You don't have to pay no toll
You just go right on through
So, he went on through the toll-gate
And as he went through...
He started pickin' up a little bit of speed
Pickin' up a little bit of steam
He got on through and he turned to look back at the man
And he said:
Well, I fooled you, I fooled you
I got pig iron, I got pig iron
I got all pig iron
Down the Rock Island Line, she's a might good road
Rock Island Line it's the road to ride
Rock Island Line is a mighty good road
Well if you ride it you gotta ride it like you find it
Get your ticket at the station for the Rock Island Line
Oh, cloudy in the west and it looks like rain
Around the curve comes a passenger train
Northbound train on a southbound track
He's already leaving, but he won't be back
Well the Rock Island Line, she's a might good road
Rock Island Line it's the road to ride
Rock Island Line is a mighty good road
Well if you ride it you gotta ride it like you find it
Get your ticket at the station for the Rock Island Line
Oh, I may be right and I may be wrong
But you're gonna miss me when I'm gone
Well the engineer said before he died
There are two more drinks that he'd like to try
The doctor said, what could they be
A hot cup of coffee and a cold glass of tea
Well the Rock Island Line, she's a might good road
Rock Island Line it's the road to ride
Rock Island Line is a mighty good road
Well if you ride it you gotta ride it like you find it
Get your ticket at the station for the Rock Island Line
(Original blues version by LEADBELLY (Capitol 15628, 1949)
And here is a site which tells the history of the Rock Island Line
(Don't suppose anybody happens to know who Huddie Ledbetter is?)
More....
Ginny
March 6, 2001 - 03:52 pm
Yes, Harold, we do look forward to your return here with your trigonometric stuff which nobody here BUT you understood, but it sure looked good! I am SOOO impressed even tho I couldn't repeat it, we've got you for that!
Ann, who knew what you said, backwards or forwards, but I appreciate the very fact that anybody understands it! Glad you liked that link, too.
Thank you so much for that wonderful map from the Historical Atlas of the United States, I got so taken with the text over it I just had to copy it and put it up, too. Thanks SOOO much~!
Pat Westerdale and Williewoody, thanks for the information on the Rock Island origins, wonder why they selected Island as a term?
And Williewoody, imagine that being the line you rode on at 4!! What memories it must have for you.
And thank you for this, too: "Bettendorf takes it's name from the company which produced most of the four wheel trucks used for railcars over the years..." Isn't it amazing how much the railroads affected our history!
Henry, I agree, actually, I prefer Biltmore House especially as it appears now, they've done a lot more with it:
The latest Biltmore House website, apparently featuring a new hotel there I can see why, if you do their candlelight nights it's a long way to a hotel in the dark.
Henry, are you quoting that old song, Enjoy yourself, it's steeper than you think? hahahahaa
Losalbern, I agree, and have often thought of what it must be like to try to homestead with the maurading indians, it would be totally frightening, because if for no other reason, I'm not aware of much communication between the two groups, that may be just my own ignorance, but can you IMAGINE never knowing when a threat would appear outside the door? Gosh.
Not to mention how the indian felt being "exterminated" just because he was walking on his own land?
It's something else to even contemplate and it was NOT that long ago!
Well we've only got one question left in the heading, do any of you all have any? What's this "ballast" stuff???
What was it used for?
ginny
losalbern
March 6, 2001 - 04:26 pm
I'm no expert but I believe that ballast is the gravel sized or small rock substance that is worked into the roadbed between the ties to help anchor the ties and rails into place. The UP people had trouble finding the gravel or small pieces of stone for ballast and so they had to resort to using sand which was easily washed away and makes the roadbed less rigid. In later years, engineers discovered that many locations in Nebraska had plenty of deep beds of gravel just below the surface of the land and which was used extensively in all sorts of construction. I believe these pits were thought to be alluvial deposits made by ancient glaciers.
Ann Alden
March 7, 2001 - 06:38 am
Ginny
I am so glad that you copied the upper print here as I thought it was just plain fun to read. Thanks!
williewoody
March 7, 2001 - 03:09 pm
While we haven't quite gotten very far into the actual construction work yet, I thought this was an interesting side story from Mike Wright's book "What They Didn't Teach You About The Wild West.
It seems that Charles Crocker of the CP made a bet of $10,000 dollars with Thom Durant of the UP that his crew would lay 10 miles of track in a single day. Durant took him up on the bet.
Using a hand picked crew, on April 29, 1869 Crocker started his crew at sunup, stopped only briefly for lunch, and quit work at sundown.
Not only did they lay 10 miles of track, they laid an additional 200 feet, using all told 3520 rails, and 55,000 spikes. Somewhere along the line I believe Ambrose will indicate the normal distance the track layers would cover was between 4 to 8 miles.
FaithP
March 7, 2001 - 08:27 pm
When I first read the book right through with no discussion I noticed there are aeveral stories of wagers and this seems to be one I recall.I also was really upset by the callous words of the railroaders about getting rid of the Indians so they could settle the west but of course I have read so much history of the opening up of the west and that is what it is always all about. Getting rid of the Indian occupants one way or another. The idea of course was to make it safe for the workers and eventually the homesteaders. Ambrose doesnt tell much about it but in other places I have read how the Railroads in the east had large programs designed to get people moved west, Bank Loans, Free Land, Instructions in how and where to homestead. This of course was to increase the production of the western faarm land and hence the freight to the eastern markets. The big advertising programs didnt come about until the 1870's I believe and this of course is when my many of my ancestors moved west. Of course my Stuart Grandfather loved to tell about walking from Pierre South Dakota to Nevada when he was 16 in 1982. He walked because he didnt have any money at all and ate whatever he could kill on the praire and worked for food when he could on the way. I think he was a brave boy. Wish I remembered more. Faith
losalbern
March 8, 2001 - 09:23 pm
Mr Huntington was very straight forward when he said; " In 1866 I went to Washington... I went into the (congressional) gallery for votes ( to get the Pacific railroad bill amended). I sat right there. I examined the face of every man...carefully through my glass. I didn't see but one man I thought would sell his vote." Sell his vote? Special interest lobbying has been around for a looooong time, folks.
williewoody
March 9, 2001 - 02:45 pm
WHOA there Bernie!. We just finished Chapter 6. unless I fell asleep somewhere along the line. I think we are on Chapter 7. If I am wrong somebody straighten me out.
Ginny
March 9, 2001 - 04:03 pm
Yes, we're on Chapter 6 through today but everybody's comments are welcome anyway!
Did you SEE Jeopardy last night? The final Jeopardy Question was who was the President when the Transcontinental Railroad was built who did not live to see it?
Two of them got it and one said Harrison, don't we all feel smart, back in a mo....
Ann when are you going to Fripp??
ginny
Ann Alden
March 9, 2001 - 04:39 pm
Possibly in the next month. I will let you know!
I belong to the Ohio Historical Society and they publish one of the nicest magazines titled TIMELINE. This month has a very long article about the two Ohio engineers or contractors who worked on the Transcontinental. Lots of pictures although we have probably seen most of them. When we get to the Casement brothers, I will see if I can glean anymore info from this article. They were the contractors who prepared the beds for the track, I believe.
losalbern
March 9, 2001 - 04:59 pm
Whoops, Chapter 9 indeed ! I became so enamored with how fast people were laying track, they just carried me right along with them. Sorry about that ! (At this stage of life, if I have something to say, I better say it before I forget it.. )
Ginny
March 10, 2001 - 12:22 pm
Say on say on, we love to hear all!
Ann, I've just been given a huge article on a railroad museum in SC here on your way, 30 miles north of Columbia and it looks neato! It's manned by retirees and volunteers and it's called "The Official Railroad Museum of South Carolina" and here's the url:
Rockton Railroad Museum . Of course, now being overcome by railroad fever, I called my friend in Columbia and said we must see this, she had never heard of it, and it looks FABULOUS!!!!
Also they are building a 6 mile line to Rion, and they have 11 miles of track running now. I think this is very exciting.
Don't
mess with volunteers and we retirees!!!!!!
Ann we do want to hear more about your article, is there, perhaps, photo of the Chinese in the baskets doing the Cape Horn, I'm on FIRE to find one!
I put the finished Cape Horn photos in the heading, somehow smaller it looks more impressive, you can SEE what they did?
Frith, I had forgotten about the incentives but do you mean 1982 for your grandfather??
Imgaine walking all that way, imagine!! What a story, they thought little then of walking but even for THEN that's quite a story. We are so soft today. I have often wanted to walk to town, 13 miles but have never done it. I need to have that as a goal, for heaven't sake LOOK at how far they all walked.
Thank you for sharing that!!!!!
Priceless!
I had also missed that about the betting!
williewoody: Thank you for that! And it would be our friend Charlie Crocker! The more I hear of him the more I like him.
We are finally getting in the construction, isn't it fascinating that "Tunnels through granite had no precedent." (page 235)...imagine, how can anybody's imagination not be soaring with this story??
Losalbern, thank you for the ballast, it's no wonder trains fell on their sides if they were held up by sand, good grief and wasn't it
ironic that there were gravel deposits below? Amazing, amazing that they got as far as they did.
All right, I have to tell you all I had no idea whatsoever about the Chinese either, where have I been all this time? That stuff about California denying them rights while they paid taxes is unbelievable! How could that happen???
ginny
FaithP
March 10, 2001 - 03:01 pm
Faith did mean 1882 as Harry Stuart was born 1866 died 1954. He also worked as a meat boy for the Union Army in the summer out in the Dakotas when he was early highschool age. A meat boy helper to kill,clean and bring to the cook the beef etc. for the army camps.They also used Cheyenne Indian Women for labor. I dont remember much detail of this story just that it was one of his jobs. Before he walked to NV. And his father was in Washington State so he walked up there.
We knew about the chinese labor being treated in shocking fashion, and we also always were shocked that the United States was so prejudiced against the Chinese they stopped all immigration of women and children. Then all immigration for awhile. The whole sad story is in history's back files. My husband found out a lot about this from a Chinese friend of his in San Francisco who was an acupuncturist. He taught us a lot of history from his families point of view. Fp
losalbern
March 12, 2001 - 04:32 pm
When one of my golfing buddies heard me talk about the Chinese workman for the CP railroad blasting their way through the Sierras, he volunteered this tidbit. Workers were lowered down the face of a cliff to drill holes and place black powder charges and a fuse long enough to allow them to be pulled up out of danger. So far that fits in with our book. But my friend stated that CP management, in order to speed up the process, kept cutting the fuses shorter and shorter so that there were times when the men in the basket did not get pulled out of the danger zone and were killed! No doubt this was hushed up. I wonder if there were statistics kept on how many Chinese working for the CP died on the job.
Ginny
March 13, 2001 - 03:59 am
Losalbern, I, too, wonder at that, and wonder if anything was kept about the Chinese and this blasting stuff, I had noted the loss of fingers and burns, I think it was, but did not know that. Where might we find more answers???
ginny
williewoody
March 13, 2001 - 07:08 am
I don't know about any statistics on Chinese deathes. I would doubt that any were kept,as they were considered an inferior people, sort of like the indians by the western people.
The Chinese were experts, however, with handling dynamite. Remember it was the Chinese that invented black gunpowder centuries ago. I believe more died from other reasons than the use of explosives.
What I find so interesting is the fact that these scrawny little men were so adept at handling such backbreakng work. I suspect the reason was they worked as teams rather than idividuals, thus spreading out the load. It has been mentioned several times that without the Chinese the CP could not have built the railroad. In my opinion, the railroad would have been built but it would have taken several years longer.
seldom958
March 14, 2001 - 07:50 pm
I put "chinese railroad workers" in the Google search engine and came up with a lot of interesting information about their contribution to building the first transcontinental railroad.
Try it.
Ginny
March 15, 2001 - 04:35 am
Williewoody, I think you're right, we know it would have been eventually, but those Chinese were sooo impressive and
thank you Seldom 958, for that hint to google, that is one MAJOR search engine, I now use it all the time since the Wall Street Journal last week said it was the best! Before that I used hotbot.
Going off to read google on the Chinese, want to see if any first person accounts have surfaced, because, I must tell you all, now that we're embarked on this railroad journey, it's affecting my life. I can't go past a town with a railroad exhibit that I don't have to go see it, am going to the SC Railroad Museum in April and the other day when digging out a bed with a short sort of implement, I imagined the Chinese and how they worked and pretended (!!??!!) I was one of them all bent over and all and I'm telling YOU they would have kicked MOI off the team the first day!
What about these trestles, too and the blasting? I thought those tunnels were something ELSE and it says that had never been done before.
Does it strike you that so many things had never been done before? What a time to live in!
ginny
Ginny
March 15, 2001 - 04:38 am
How about question #2 up there? How did YOU take it the way Ambrose wrote about the opium use? Looked to me like he said the boss deducted the wages FOR opium BEFORE they were given the men?
????
ginny
Ann Alden
March 15, 2001 - 06:18 am
I am also trying to read along in another book, Empire Express, and there is an interesting chapter in there about Chinese bigshots meeting with the CP bigshots. I will go read it and let you know what it says. I think it has to do with hiring the Chinese for the railroad but I could be wrong. Occasionally, I am!
Harold Arnold
March 16, 2001 - 08:59 am
I note the According to Ambrose that the CP could not get sufficient white labor paying a $3.00 daily wage. This was about $0.25 an hour based on a 12-hour workday. But this was most certainly a high wage at the time. I think a dollar a day was much more the going wage for a laborer in other areas of the country. I know this was true in Texas. There cowboys hired in the late 1860’s and 70’s to drive cattle to the railhead in Kansas , received one dollar a day plus their food and keep.
Ambrose points out that white men had come to California to get rich mining gold. To them accepting a job on the railway was to work long enough to get a “grub stake.” This was sufficient to get some to sign-on, but not to keep them long. After a few weeks they had accumulated enough and left. This led to the Chinese who they paid an inflated wage (for Chinese labor) of only one dollar a day. I called this an inflated wage because Ambrose says the going wage for a Chinese houseboy or laundry worker was $3.00 a week. Of course the Chinese workers had to pay for their food and opium, but based on the Ambrose numbers this still left them about $20.00 a month. They were hard workers and stuck to their job. Apparently some, no doubt a very few, achieved a higher economic position from their RR work as Ambrose cites one who earned enough to open his own laundry and another who returned to his village in China “with unlimited wealth, made in America.”
I am not surprised by the opium use of the Chinese labor on their day off. In the 19th century in the big cities of Europe and North America ‘opium dens were very common. They were certainly to be found in the San ‘ Francisco Chinatown, and an opium den there is described by Kipling in his “American Notes” book. Ginny didn’t Kipling witness a murder in one that necessitated his rather haste departure before the police arrived?
I was surprised by the Ambrose comment that the term coolie came from a Hindu term meaning common laborer and that it came through the British who had heard the word in India. In my day up until my reading of this chapter I had always thought of the word as Chinese in origin.
And finally I was not surprised by the Ambrose description of the Californian discrimination against the Chinese American workers. Throughout the 19th and the first half of the 20th centuries, America should best be described as a “melting Pot” society, not a multi-cultural one. Any group that did not readily blend with the majority was suspect and subject to both private and legal discrimination. It was as if the dominant Anglo society stood each new immigrant before a mirror. If the observed reflection did not bear a close resemblance to his own, the new immigrant would not be accepted as a full pledged brother citizen of the land.
FaithP
March 16, 2001 - 02:58 pm
Last Monday I was reading our book with a magnafing glass with a light in it and tuesday I had surgery. I had bandages off wensday and was immediatly able to see out of my right eye and it was so bright and colorful I became seasick sort of. I was soon adjusting. My Doctor said I will need glasses for focusing the two eyes and will have them measured in about two weeks. I am so glad I had this surgery and should have done last year. I didnt realize I was so blind and now that this eye is fixed the other is seeing better too. Will be reading again as soon as soreness goes away. I had read whole book before but I was trying to find out if the company did give the opium to the laborors asks Ginny. I didnt think so but couldnt find a definitive answere. NO I am not surprised at the treatment of the Chinese and the Indians as described in Ambroses book after growing up here in the west with all the stories we have of how the west was won etc. Will be back later. Faith
Ann Alden
March 16, 2001 - 04:16 pm
Well, I reread that chapter, really just a page or two, about the meeting but it didn't go into any detail as to why they were meeting other than to entertain Sen Colfax and three other journalists who were trying to undermine the CP. Acutally, Ambrose has much more info about the Chinese. I have one more book to look into and will try to find something else besides Ambrose's pretty complete account.
One thing that I think I did read years ago, was that the British were the ones who addicted the Chinese to opium by paying for Chinese tea with opium. Anyone else know about that?
Ann Alden
March 16, 2001 - 04:24 pm
I found this site with a article about the Chinese as the "missing workers" on the railroad. You might want to read it.
Missing Chinese Workers
Ginny, I found an article about the Chinese hanging in baskets but so far no historian can verify the baskets. For one thing the cliffs are not straight enough for hanging a basket over and the picture that we see everywhere is one that is used so often but was taken in China. Here's the article. Baskets?
Ginny
March 16, 2001 - 05:02 pm
Faith!!! Welcome back and seeing like new again, how exciting, we were wondering how you came out and HERE you are, like new again, how exciting! So happy for you!!
Harold, thank you for that background on the wages, that seems unusually small for OUR day, doesn't it? I was surprised at the word "coolie," too, will look it up in the OED, I've got an old set.
That's an interesting point you make about the difference between the Melting Pot and the Multi Cultural Society! I always thought "Melting Pot" was a good term, you mean it isn't?
!! See what all we're learning here.
Ann thank you for those links, and the BASKET one is something ELSE! When I first looked at it I thought oh no I can't read all that but I got hooked and hooked and HOOKED and ...well, was it ropes or was it baskets or was it ""Bosun's Chairs supported by ropes to do the preliminary cutting."
[The definition of a Bosun's Chair is "a wooden plank or canvas chair for a worker hung by ropes over the side of a ship, Building or Bridge." But it is also a rope sling made to support ones thighs and rump while hanging from a rope as any sailor can tell you, like those used by rock climbers of today."
And look who that piece of information came from: Courtesy Edson T. Strobridge (name familiar?)
My goodness, can you imagine such energy put to establising the basket/ rope/ Bosun's Chair thing?
Now where would Ambrose get the idea of baskets, one wonders?
TOMORROW we move on to Chapter 8. I saw a very sad article in...I think it was U.S. News this week that the American railroad may be doomed? That Amtrak is operating in the red, they all are, and it even had a table of the loss per passenger and the long trains going west are the ones most suffering.
It does not look from that article as if anything can save it, did you all see it? I'll try to find it, it's either in US News or Newsweek or Time (we take them all, but I'm betting US News for this week)....made me quite sad to see it.
ginny
Henry Misbach
March 16, 2001 - 08:21 pm
Folks, I don't think we can ignore two of the soundest kinds of historical evidence you can ever hope to find. One is an old saying. It just leaves no doubt that Caucasians didn't place much value on the life of a Chinese. Because if "not a Chinaman's chance" comes from that time and place, not much additional evidence is necessary. The other "good" source, if authentic, is the phrase book. Of course there is no need to thank those whom we suppose to be created for hard work.
Ain't irony wonderful? The white men did everything they could to keep the Chinese away from the mines, the perceived source of major wealth. So while they toiled for nothing, the Chinese earned both salaries and pensions.
How did they do it? Tea. Go figure.
I think there's more evidence to support than to deny the "basket" story. It goes to admit that the Chinese contributed something to the undertaking that even the engineers hadn't thought of. Much of the "rope" discussion seems to include either Caucasians or Chinese. It has a plausible ring to it, which is probably why Ambrose seems to accept it.
No, I don't think the railroad, as such, mattered a great deal to the Chinese, who were out to improve their living standards.
I don't suppose anyone cares to guess the origin of a term Ambrose uses, also from the British imperial experience (that should give it away), namely, posh as a synonym for luxurious.
losalbern
March 16, 2001 - 10:14 pm
I swear that I learn more about the subject matter from you people's postings than I ever did from Ambrose's book. Ann those clickables were just great and certainly sympathetic to the value of the Chinese workers. Faith, are'nt those colors vivid now? I go in bright and early Monday morning for my cataract surgery. I will be posting or lurking as soon as I become accustomed to the brightness again.
Ginny
March 17, 2001 - 05:19 am
I know POSH!!!!!!! I know posh! We learned it here! In one of our discussions, Henry I DO know POSH and without looking it up it means Port Out Starboard Home when cruising the side of the ship you want to be on??
Now tell me that's right!!!!!!!!!
We learned that here, does anybody remember what discussion that was in?
Thank you for that perspective of the Chinese, Henry, and why their own contributions might not have been remembered.
Can we say here that Ambrose then is adding something important to the perception then? Maybe he's doing a better job than we thought??
Qould anybody like to write Dr. Ambrose or his son Dr. Ambrose (they have a website) and ask what particular evidence they used FOR the basket theory? Or is it cited here?
Losalbern, good luck with YOUR surgery and we will await your return with the same glee as Faith's!!!
It was interesting to me that Ann's parallel text gave not as much mention as Ambrose did to the Chinese contribution.
Back tomorrow with the next chapter!
ginny
Henry Misbach
March 17, 2001 - 09:26 am
Ginny, you're getting too sharp. I'll have to come up with something much more arcane with which to challenge you.
Beware, 'bernie. What you get from this quarter may be educated conjecture, but it still doesn't rise much above that.
On a very loosely related subject, I'd like to put in a plug for a book of recent history: "Caught in the Path. A Tornado's Fury, a Community's Rebirth," by Carolyn Glenn Brewer. It's loosely related because that tornado had me fooled. It sounded so much like a train (it followed the KC Southern route a considerable distance), I only dismissed that alternative because the rate of "clack-clack" bespoke a much faster train than I had heard come through there in years. Katie and I posted about this book on Amazon.com--you might like to check it out. Brewer's organizing principle for this book is unique and very effective.
FaithP
March 17, 2001 - 07:13 pm
Losalbern how great you will be able to see all this wonderful colorful world again like I do. I waited too long. My son laughed at me because the Dr. called me a Very Anxious Patient. I wish you all the best in the world to take with you to your surgery. It was a miricle how painless the whole thing was.
Did we talk about posh in the Ancient Mariner Discussion? I am not sure. I was reading a book for the first time today with no magnifing glass. By next week will be searching for reading material again and of course I can finish my second read of Chapter 8&9 upcoming.
My grandmother lived in San Francisco in the winter in the 30's and 40's and her favorite place to walk and shop was Grant and Washington which is Chinatown there. She knew some of the shop keepers well but I noticed that she always spoke of these people with a certain prejudiced toward their origins,though she would have hated to be confronted with that fact. It was evident too in and around my town I went to highschool in, a prejudice against all the Chinese and also the Japanese in central CA. I remember we worked hard at erasing prejudiced talk and phrasing to avoid passing along the cultural biases to our children. I for one would never use the term "chinaman" after a Social Science teacher in Placer High told me that was derogatory in the Chinese mind. All we can do is try to right those wrongs and not continue to pass them down to children. Faith
williewoody
March 18, 2001 - 02:10 pm
So you thought that the first transcontinental railroad was built by the Central Pacific R.R. Co, and the Union Pacific R. R.Co. Not true. The first was built 14 years earlier in a foreign country.
Still, the Panama Railroad was built and operated by Americans with U. S. investment. It was completed January 27, 1855. It is interesting to note what an important role this little 47 mile railroad played for the benefit of the Central Pacific. Remember they had to transport most their materials and much of their rollinig stock from the east coast via Panama.
Centuries earlier the Spanish conquistidores built a cobblestone road thru the jungles, so that combining the use of donkeys, dugout canoes and river boats travelers were able to transverse the approximately 50 miles across Panama, thus avoiding the long 7000 miles around the southern tip of South America.
This was by no means a joyful experience through swamps with malaria infected mosquitos, and scores of crocodiles and poisonous snakes to add to the travelers pleasure.
At any rate following is a thumb nail sketch of the major points of the construction of this very important link between the east and west coasts of the United States.
The complete story from beginning up to 1999 is covered in an article written by Clfton E.(Gene) Hull and published in the November 1999 issue of the National Railway Bulletin, a publication of the National Railway Historical Society.
Steming from President James Mnroe's promulgation of the "Monroe Doctrine", in 1832 Congress sent Col. Charles Biddle to Panama to try to negotiate a concession for the U.S. to build a railway. Apparently he was not sucessful as it was not until 1848 that the Pacific Mail Steamship Co. was successful in getting that concession. Among the incorporators was a William H. Aspinwall. The Company built three paddlewheel steamships to deliver mail between New York and San Francisco. Early on, the California gold strike diverted attention away from the mail delivery contract and the company realized the demand for passenger transport would increase as gold seekers wanted the fastest route from the east to get to California.
The company's concession from Columbia was to build a railroad or a highway or a canal. They were granted 250,000 acres of land and could freely use government land.
A low gap in the continental divide was discovered which was only 300 feet above sea level, which was a far cry from the altitudes faced by the Central Pacific and Union Pacific in the Sierras and Rocky Mountains. Well, while the Panama railroad builders didn't have to blast through mountains and fight hostile indians, they still had to plow their way through mosquito laden swamps in intense heat. Besides the local trees were not suitable as cross ties or for trestles, and the local natives were unaccustomed to physical labor and were of little use. Thus men and materials had to be imported. During constuction on low ground when the tide came in the workers were standing in almost 5 feet of water.
The town of Aspinwall (later Colon) was established as the Atlantic side terminus, while Panama City was the end of the line on the Pacific side.
Originally the rail gauge was 5 foot 6 inches,but in later years it was reduced to 5 foot.
Later on I will recall some interesting stories that occurred during the building of this railroad. Remember how often Theodore Judah traveled back and forth between California and Washington D.C. always via Panama. That would have made him one of the little railroads "regular " passengers. The tale of the Panama Railroad gets real interesting after the period of time we are studying in Ambrose's book. The story of all the political finegeling that went on during the period of the building of the Panama Canal, is at times amost hilarious. But that's another story.
Ginny
March 19, 2001 - 10:13 am
This was quite a chapter, wasn't it?
It's a long one but full of excitement, you catch the excitement and the true accomplishment here, you really can't help get caught up in it.
So many questions I have, some new general topics in the heading and hope to add yours, too?
Ambrose wondered and I can't find it now, why Reed couldn't make that one decision without consulting Durant even when ordered by Dodge, didn't you find that strange also?
Wonder why??
I don't understand how they laid the track? I don't understand what happened to all those wonderfully military cars which went forward first and then...where did they all GOOO? The sleeping cars, the all those CARS, were there side tracks? More than one track? How did they run rails down them when there was already something else there at the end of the line?
How did they run a horse down the middle of the ties at a gallop?
How did they manage to jerk off rails off a wagon from a horse going by at a gallop? Horse galloping on page 289..
The way they organized this thing was amazing, just amazing, it's a real contrast to the CP isn't it? Wonder why? That's one of the questions in the heading, what was the most important factor there? Nebraska would be easier to cross than the Sierra Nevada, that's for sure, but the whole thing is very exciting, to me.
The Telegrams of Reed to Durant are fascinating, aren't they? Can't you just capture the feeling as if you were there (p. 280ff).. Just loved that. He seems so alive, somehow.
On page 293, Ambrose says that "This was the beginning of what would be called assembly-line work." I thought that was an interesting statement, myself....is this true?
What about the press and the cessation of the Civil War and the need for more interesting stories?
Wow there's a lot in this chapter...how about the cottonwood which was so green that the firemen insisted it sprouted in the firebox? HUH?
Just wanted to post the new Chapter's beginning before responding to everybody's posts, so we could get started.
And there's so much more!!!!!!!
What are YOUR thoughts on reading this somewhat long but exhilerating chapter??
ginny
FaithP
March 19, 2001 - 11:47 am
Williewoody I thank you so much for your including that information on the Panama Railway. I have read a few things about it and now want to go read more. Sounds really devastating with the geographic hazards. Still men do amazing things.
I am sure there was a great feeling of exuburance that took over out on the plains, and contributed to the fast movement across Nebraska.The war had gathered the right men together to get things done too, and the logistics of the whole procedure seemed very military to me.
I must reread some today to refresh my memory. Faithp
Ginny
March 20, 2001 - 06:15 am
Faith, thank you for those remembrances of Chinatown and the prejudice that existed then, I had never heard of it and you're so right it needs to die, perhaps different areas had different prejudices because of their own populations of new comers?
I know I never heard the so called "Polish joke" till I left Pennsylvania, I guess it would be kinda stupid to tell "Polish jokes" to Poles???!!!
At any rate thanks for that.
Williewoody, thank you so much for bringing here this fascinating and timely parallel to what we're reading, the article written by Clfton E.(Gene) Hull and published in the November 1999 issue of the National Railway Bulletin, a publication of the National Railway Historical Society.
It's amazing how many times so much of what we read conincides! We look forward to learning more!
Where ARE you all and are you all up on this quite interesting chapter? Would like to hear from you!
Have you ever looked down a railroad track and wondered how they keep those green lights shining and how they keep the trains apart? Remember the old billy goat who coughed up the red shirt and flagged the train in the song?
Here, for your interest, , are two control towers, the older Signal Tower and the modern Dispatcher's Office,
The Signal Tower played an important role in safe railroad travel.
In the early days, trains were prevented from crashing into each other by running only at specific intervals.
People waving flags or batons signalled to the trains when it was safe to move on.
When a train had to change direction at a junction, the switches were manually operated.
The invention of the electric telegraph in the 1850's enabled towermen to send meassages to other signal towers along the lines.
This development led to each train being separated by a space interval, called a block. Signals and switches for each block were mechanically controlled from the signal tower.
The illustration shows a British Signal Tower with 40 levers in it's frame for operating signals and switches. The bell at the upper right sends coded messages (in the US Morse code was used) to other signal towers.
The red levers shown here are for stop and are pulled into the OFF or CLEAR position.
The blue levers are for locks on switches, the black levers control the switches themselves, and the white levers are spare.
Other instruments on top are "block instruments" which indicate to the towerman whetehr the line in either direction is empty or occupied by a train.
That thing looks like a heck of a lot of work for anybody to deal with, doesn't it?
Compare the Modern Dispatcher's Computer Office on which the strangest looking things are the wheels of the rolling chairs?
Altho very different in appearance from the old Signal Tower, signalling is still based on the BLOCK system. This modern system covers the tracks in many miles in each direction. A large screen in light green above the computers shows the switches and signals and the location aof all trains. Push-button controls activate signals and operate switches using electric motors.
From Eyewitness Books: Trains
Interesting, no??
I guess that's why you don't want your foot near a switch!
ginny
losalbern
March 21, 2001 - 11:10 am
Guess what, I am posting without my glasses this morning ! I can see my "floaters" much better now, too !~ Now to the question as to why the UP made such good progress going across Nebraska. First of all, its flat. No mountains to blast through. Just prairie. That flat land is much easier to lay a roadbed on. Then again, one of Durant's major premises is to build cheap and build fast, get the mileage money and then repair where necessary. Cottonwood ties and sand ballast! Hey man we will fix it later. But get the government money now.
Ginny
March 21, 2001 - 12:59 pm
Losalbern!!! You, too?? Congratulations!
Yes, Nebraska was flat do you think that the press made the enthusiasm more than it was warranted? Because I got all caught up in the excitement myself, hahahaha.
Yesterday the paper here was like deja vu, our SC Governor and a bunch of other governors pushing for a new railroad, a high speed one, it sounds and looks just like what we're reading! Nothing new under the sun, let's hope they can do it,they're aiming at fixing some of the track to accommodate 90 mph trains on the Eastern Seaboard. After reading this I want stock!
After reading this I want my own railroad!
hahahah
ginny
williewoody
March 21, 2001 - 02:00 pm
A couple of stories about the UP when they were building across Nebraska.
A war party of Indians tried to capture a locomotive. They stretched rawhide lariats across the tracks and tied the ends to their pony's saddles.
When the train arrived it hit the rawhide barrier, which was no barrier at all, and the indians and their ponies were pulled into the locomotive's drive wheels and killed. Needless to say they didn't try that stunt again.
williewoody
March 21, 2001 - 02:21 pm
In reply to your three questions in the heading please consider the following:
1. Military organization was also responsible plus flat land and a fantastc job of marshalling the trains to deliver a steady stream of materials for constuction.
2. No. Paul Bunyan.
3. The Indians did sabotage the tracks and the telegraph lines.
Ann Alden
March 21, 2001 - 02:34 pm
Williewoody, do you mean that those movies about the Indians chasing the trains were true? My gosh!
Ginny
That picture of the second signal desk was very strange until I figured out what I was looking at. Looked like an arch on a bridge or over a river. Then, I spotted the spider legs of the chairs. Hahahaha!
Harold Arnold
March 21, 2001 - 07:03 pm
Another factor favoring the UP was their position relatively close to the main source of materials and supplies. Also there were reliable rail and River steamer communciation connecting them to their suppliers. In sharp contrast the CP's line of communciation was thousands of miles by ship to Panama, unloading and rail across Panama, another ship journey on the Pacific to San Francisco, and then again by rail to Sacramento and beyound to the construction. Add to this the Siera Nevada mountains and their task seems infinately greater that the UP's.
I am again operating with my notebook with its terribly anoying keyboard. The Dell desktop has crashed again for the third time and all indication are that I will again have to re-format and re-install windows, all its drivers and the application software and work files from my back-up. This will limit my contribution, but I will try to reman active.
Henry Misbach
March 21, 2001 - 08:30 pm
Harold, I of course sympathize with your computer problems. I still believe a '30's Underwood is an improvement over Office 2000. Margin settings are easier now, but nothing beats matching thumb-and-forefinger on each of two hands. And, would you believe, there is no way to type an umlaut over an o or u: the lummoxes that programmed it never heard of it, I suppose. And in my day in college the myth was that science people took German. Hah! Double Hah!
Well, folks, I ask your indulgence. Here in Cruso, NC we had a 12-hour blizzard that gave us 13 inches of snow and no power for most of the day. The good side is that it gave me a chance to go through chapter 8 closely. On p. 174, I think Mr. Ambrose let his control get away from him. I feel pretty sure that the boarding cars were each eighty feet long, not 8 as he says. There is an interesting sequence in which he seems to be working on two different days and to have forgotten what he did the previous day. First Durant fires his brother, Frank, together with two other men. One of them, Herbert Hoxie, turns up the next page (day?) and gets reassigned by Dodge to Omaha as transfer agent there. Apparently, the UPac was no stranger to either downsizing, lean production, or management techniques we associate more with modern industry than military. In military structure, the man on the ground often has considerable leeway. Here, Reed seems to have to ask Durant many questions. It seems clear that he knew Durant well and knew he wanted to micro-manage the job from afar.
On the Dan Casement question, I dunno. Seems like I've heard of men capable of pressing that much weight; merely lifting is considerably easier. I don't believe he did it "without any trouble." As Williewoody says, we do have a need to imbue our frontier characters with superhuman traits, but I'm not entirely sure it is at work here.
On p. 172, maybe Ambrose means to bring Seymour back in a subsequent chapter and explain his "great deal of mischief." He does not in this chapter.
As others have commented, I am in agreement that I cannot really imagine the supposed scenario in which a wagon was pulled forward on already laid rails, presumably on ties that had not been filled with ballast. If we suppose the ties were close together enough to permit a bumpy ride for the wagon, it still isn't clear how the horse keeps from breaking a leg. That's something I don't get either. Even the picture of Casement and his men doesn't help. The horse in the background seems to be standing outside, not inside, the rails as is claimed.
I wonder if Oliver Ames, who eased Durant out of his despotism (which, while it may have been an enlightened one, certainly was one), has any eponymous relationship to Ames, IA.
On page 171, I enjoy how it once again becomes apparent how much of the English language we've lost. I recall hearing my Ancient history boss at Wisconsin use the term "celerity" in a sentence. He said he wanted the papers I was grading back to him "with all the celerity consistent with dignity!" Good ol' Charlie! The lack of that word in my vocabulary in high school partly explains why I hadn't a clue that the "c" in E=Mc-squared stands for the speed (celerity) of light. It's the loss of the Classics from our education.
Since the Missouri state legislature had outlawed the hiring of former slaves in that state, it is both surprising and commendable that the UPac used as many as three hundred. Of course, Dodge had shown earlier a more open mind than usual for the period.
Why didn't the Indians attack the rails directly? They seem to have supposed that especially ferocious attacks on the people would scare others away. It didn't work. Maybe their lack of the technology necessary to do major destruction was an inhibiting factor. Our forebears saw this problem as essentially without solution, and I'm not sure we can reasonably offer them a useful one, even with 20-20 hindsight.
Sorry. I had a lot to say. But who knew it would snow this much?
Henry
williewoody
March 22, 2001 - 08:29 am
GINNY: Yes, the Indians did chase tains like in the movies. According to my outside source sometime in 1868, Spotted Tail, chief of the Lakota Sioux, who were apparently peaceful by that time, took band of his braves to see what Jack Casement and his crew were doing. This was about 150 miles west of Omaha.
First the Indians gave the workmen an exhibition of their skill with he bow and arrow. Then the whites challenged Spotted Tail to a race with teir horses against the iron horse.
They convinced Spotted Tail to ride in the cab of the locmotive during the race. The Indian ponies quickly took the lead,but the locomotive caught up easily and passed the band of braves, and the race was over.
One thing I see wrong with this story is that by 1868 I believe the line was much further west of Omaha than 150 miles. Of course, the incident was probably much further back on the line where a gang of workmen might have been removing and replacing rotted ties caused by the original use of cottonwood ties which were inferior to hardwoods. I hasten to make this observation as I know Henry and Harold would surely pick up on it.
FaithP
March 22, 2001 - 11:16 am
williewoody that is a grand tale and I love it. I wont pick it apart. I think I have read it or heard it before as it is familiar. This discussion is great. I am sure it was a terrible thing for the Indians to realize that the "Iron Horse" was here to stay and their efforts to stop it were not working. Fp
Harold Arnold
March 22, 2001 - 07:11 pm
1868 was about the time of a treaty between the U.S. and the Sioux band led by Spotted Tail. Apparently he did not again take up arms against the U.S. Dee Brown in "Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee" gives him considerable coverage. His picture is on page 127 of the book. A short biographical sketch can be read by clicking on the link below.
Spotted Tail
losalbern
March 22, 2001 - 09:05 pm
Harold, that was some link about Spotted Tail that you furnished us. I noted with interest that AALICE, in the Nebraska discussion group, recently posted the fact that Chief Red Cloud, an adversary of Spotted Tail and a rival for the rank of Chief of the Sioux, has been inducted into the Nebraska Hall Of Fame at the state Capital in Lincoln. All of which reminds me that as a youngster, I read a series of books about young Indian boys growing up within their own tribe, long before the advent of the white man. Each book was written about the mores of a given tribe,and was so interesting because each boy in each tribe(and each book) grew up with slightly different groundrules,learning the tribal rules. Each boy eager to show his own prowess as a hunter of game, his fierceness, determination, outdoor skills, willingness to suffer pain, et al. Each book showed who that tribe held as their worst enemy. A Brave who stole horses from his ancient enemy was given great honor within his own tribe and was a great hero to all the young Indian boys. And in battle, it was important to "count coup" by feats of unusual bravery. I loved this series of books as a youthful reader and I have tried in adulthood to find who that author was but without success.
Ginny
March 23, 2001 - 04:52 am
losalbern, Harold, and Williewoody, thank you for the additional information (and link, Harold) to the indian background. When you think about it there were many peoples touched by this railroad, the indian, the Chinese, and now Henry picks up the slaves which I passed over quickly, that's interesting! Good point, Faith on the indian perspective, too. Thanks so much!!
Ann, hahaha on the feet of the chairs, they
do look strange!
Henry, you need to get snowbound more often!! You're
kidding on the c in E=Mc squared, aren't you? I knew celerity, but not what the c stood for, so much for the application of knowledge! hahahaha
I do think it's possible to indicate the umlaut, I will throw that to the Techie Teams here in the Books and see what they come up with!
Harold, my sympathies on the laptop, I also have a terrible time with those keyboards, I use an ergonomic one and it's murder trying to deal with the laptop, hope you can get back up and running soon. Does Dell not help? I have a Dell and have never had a problem with it, knock on head.
Henry am so glad you, too, couldn't get the wagons/ construction thing, the galloping threw me way off. The way it's said here there ought to be a real parade at the end of the tracks, altho somewhere I thought I saw it saying that the cars were overturned, that must have been fun for those in the bunks. I had gotten the impression the horses originally ran along side the tracks, somewhat like a canal thing but it does clearly state in the middle of those ties? Dunno.
I loved your catching the firing mistake, that's great reading. It's things like these two things which usually confuse a person like me who knows so little of history.
And you and williewoody don't think lifting 600 lbs might be an exaggeration, so I'll stifle, but I thought that Paul Bunyan, willie, was more of a myth than anything else: blue ox?
I was very excited to see in the newspaper yesterday the fact that it's SC Senator Fritz Hollings who is leading the push in the Senate for a new High Speed Rail System in the Eastern US, urging the passing of a $12 billion dollar bonds issues for two high speed rail routes. One close to the coast from DC to Jacksonville Florida, and the other from DC to Charlotte to Atlanta, these to connect to the high speed lines from DC to Boston.
Here's the concluding paragraph of the ed op article:
The high-speed rail project is a forward-looking venture that could be crucial to our long-term economic prospects.
Shades of the past, the rest of the article could have been lifted from Judah's propsal, and may have been. hahahaha
A forward looking venture which has its roots in yesterday, like so many other things, I guess.
Harold I thought that was a great point about the ready aviliability of supplies in contrast to the UP, too.
I'm still wondering about those cottonwood ties which sprouted in the fireboxes, and still don't know the relative weight of either the old engines or the new.
What question might YOU have after reading this section or comment??
ginny
williewoody
March 23, 2001 - 06:23 am
GINNY: I think you may have misunderstood my answer to question #2. Perhaps I was too brief. No, I don.t think Mr Casement could lift a 600 pound rail. I think it was a myth like Paul Bunyan.
Ginny
March 23, 2001 - 07:23 am
Oh ok, sorry, I thought that maybe the Olympics missed a great person then, hahahaha
Gotcha now!!
Trying to think of other myths in American folklore besides Paul Bunyan and now Mr. Casement....hahahaha
ginny
Ginny
March 23, 2001 - 07:28 am
Well that didn't take LONG! Here, Henry, from our Technical Teams here in the Books are two suggestions and maybe they will work out for you.
The first is for your own computer from Jane:
Look in the Character Map on your computer...Start/Programs/Accessories/ System Tools/Character Map
OR ALT 0235 =ë
ALT 0246 = ö
ALT 0252 = ü
ALT 0228 = ä
Caps are also available.
The second is for posting on the internet from Pat W:
Umlaut or dieresis mark
\
Here is a link to
Rammel's Special Character Set It gives the numeric code for putting the umlaut above any letter, small or capital.
Hopefully, Henry, those might work. I do recall the EF Benson site printing out a long one and if these two don't work I will try to find where I filed that.
Good luck, everybody's computer is different!
ginny
FaithP
March 23, 2001 - 10:24 am
I thought sure I saw a weight lifter in a contest win with 600lbs. Where the weight is on the ground and the lifter squats lifts firt to knees, huffs, to waist, puffs, up into the air, and then suddenly drops down the whole all at once. It seems I really did see this on TV...Dont know how to research this. And any horse I ever rode would break a leg racing down railroad ties. Perhaps he was alongside as Ginny suggested. Or else that horse walked and picked his way!!!fp
losalbern
March 23, 2001 - 11:53 am
I don't read as intensely as many of you do. I skim the text to get the mental picture as quickly as possible. It doesn't always work perfectly, but it is a habit I picked up years ago and now I am stuck with it. That is why I was so surprised to hear the disclaimers about the horse drawn cars loaded with rails and other supplies. I will not clain to have read that scene correctly, but this is what I got out of it. First, the cars were flat cars; no sides to hinder loading and unloading. The horses, I pictured, found it easier to draw that load by walking, not running, alongside the track. When the car reached the end of the line, the men there quickly unloading the rails or ties or what have you and as soon as that was accomplished, the car was tipped over on its side to get it off the track. Shortly after that, another length of rail was laid, allowing yet another flatcar of supplies to move to the new end of the line. The first flatcar was then tipped back onto the track, horses hitched to it and then they were galloped full tilt back to where the supplies were and the whole process was repeated. This may not be what was written or even read but right or wrong, it makes sense to me.
Henry Misbach
March 23, 2001 - 06:01 pm
Ginny, I appreciate your efforts to hone my computer skills. Of course, I do feel that my original claim stands: it was much simpler on the old Underwood. Too bad they had to exhume poor old Rommel just for an umlaut (heh-heh-heh).
On celerity, see David Bodanis' recent book E=Mc2. You'll find it is as I have described. My high school taught physics but not Latin; so we tended to take the c as standing for the word "constant," though contrary to the convention of using k. I have come to suspect that there was some deliberate fuzziness in how we were taught Einstein's theory during the cold war years.
I must, for now, more nearly side with Losalbern than Ambrose in the technique used in laying the tracks. His account flies in the face of physical probability in too many ways.
Although I know Losalbern suspects mythic intent in the 600 lb. rail story, I still don't. A 30' rail section must have weighed in that neighborhood, if not precisely that weight. A man who could pick one up unassisted would be remarked upon. Remember, these men worked at what we would call hard physical labor every day.
Henry
Harold Arnold
March 23, 2001 - 08:16 pm
I wonder how long those cottonwood ties lasted?. Cotton wood is soft and I suspect such wood not treated with chemicals would have to be replaced in less than 10 years. I know pine or fir 2X4's untreated are about consumed here if lying on the ground in 2 to 3 years. The pressurized treated board walk in front of the house will probably make it's 20 year guarantee.
Of course a RR tie is much thicker than a 2X4. In the 20th century RR ties were treated with creosote under pressure. To day other chemicals are used. I don't recall any mention of treating ties in the book.
williewoody
March 24, 2001 - 08:01 am
HAROLD: please note your last comment. If you will refer to page 140 and also the footnote you will see that they did treat the cottonwood ties.
Ann Alden
March 26, 2001 - 07:32 am
I have a picture of the factory where the cememt was put into the cottonwood ties for the Casement Brothers. Will search for it.
I understood that the horses would only go along the side, as was done with the canal boats.
Ann Alden
March 26, 2001 - 08:05 am
I have sent my pictures to Ginny for putting up here. My brain is numb today and can't remember how to do it. Sorry about that. And, its "Burnetized!" The name of the process used on the ties.
Ginny
March 26, 2001 - 08:45 am
Ann has sent several great things, first off, a photo of the Burnettizing of the ties followed by the desciption, and a large photo of the wagon trains and mules (?!?) bringing the supplies, followed by the text of same. That last photo has me more confused than ever, read on.....
Treating the ties The wagons hauling the rails to the end of the track!
Thanks so much, ANN!!!
I believe my own confusion about the supposed boondoggle at the end of the tracks comes from the long descriptions of the bunk cars on page 285, and then the paragraph starting out "Ahead of the four construction trains came a locomotive pulling a general-repair car that held a blacksmith shop...then the feed store and carptenter shop, then a sleeping car or two, then a sitting and dining room for foremen, then a long dining room...on pages 291 and 292, and finally by page 279..." going forward to the end of the track, he wrote, are the boarding cars and a construction train...."
I confess I am confused by the logistics of this enterprise, but am not a close reader, and still am seeing all these bunk cars standing at the end of the tracks. I seem to see something on this second read thru somewhere about side tracks but then again when the Commissioners made their trip, they arrived on the bottom of page 294 and 295 "at the end of the track toward the end of the day when the men were seated in the dining car having their meal."
I think it's fairly plain that a horse, however nimble he might be, could not leap over these rail cars to draw a wagon with ties?
Not sure what I am reading here hahahaha
While we ponder this thing, let's move on this afternooon to Chapter 9, is the slower pace dragging down things or helping, do you think?
ginny
Ann Alden
March 26, 2001 - 01:59 pm
Here is the description of ballast that is in the same article.
"In the spring of 1853 Casement, 24 and already an experienced railroad > builder, obtained a contract to ballast tracks for the Lake Shore RR. Ballast, > a layer of crushed stone or other material placed between and under the > crossties, provides a foundation and drainage for the tract. Crushed stone was > used on the best-built railroads, but many lines ie.Union Pacific, to save > money or speed initial construction, substituted gravel, cinders, or even dirt. > " >Ginny
That's wonderful! I didn't know that they could be separated. Thanks much!
williewoody
March 27, 2001 - 07:01 am
The cross tie problem has always been a big problem for the railroads. Either Henry or Harold I believe mentioned earlier that in recent times ties have been treated with creosote as a preservative. I might mention that now railroads are using concrete ties.I don't know if this is still an experiment, but it seems I am seeing them in use in more places.I do know that the Canadian railroads (Canadian Pacific, and Canadian National) are using them all across the continent. Obviously, they should be virtually wearproof.
Ginny
March 27, 2001 - 07:19 am
I saw them in England, too, williewoody, on my trip last year, in fact, remarked on it at the time.
Somewhere in some of my reading I saw that they had deliberately "replaced" the old concrete ties with wood, I have no idea where I read that or who said it, obviously could not have been in the American West, yet that would solve a lot of the Burnettizing problems, wouldn't it?
ginny
losalbern
March 27, 2001 - 04:00 pm
Sometime last week, there was a news story about a Burlington train that was derailed in Iowa with serious consequences. I recall seeing a picture of the locomotive and some following cars on their sides and other cars at various angles to the track. But that story just died out and disappeared. And I don't think anyone in this discussion group even mentioned it, which seems unusual for people interested in trains. I wonder why? Perhaps because the incident didn't happen on UP rails?
Ginny
March 27, 2001 - 04:18 pm
Losalbern, I just barely caught it on the news and don't know much about it, hopefully somebody here who does will tell us more!
ginny
Ann Alden
March 27, 2001 - 05:26 pm
In discussing this with "himself", I got the info that the US recently might have decided not to go with the concrete ties because of the damage and wear to the rolling stock when using them. He is not sure of that so don't quote him! Ok, we won't!! Right???
I saw that wreck on CNN when it happened. Fortunately, no one was killed(or maybe 2?) but many were taken to the hospitals. And, you are right, it just disappeared from the news scene. But isn't that what always happens? I thought it was an Amtrak train so I misunderstood.
Like Ginny, I read the article in US News about Amtrak's financial woes and their request for $30M for studying faster trains on top of the $28M they have already received since their beginnings in 1971. Where does it stop? I feel that we didn't have the confidence in saving our passenger trains way back and now we are trying to recover them as Europe has done. The train system there was never retired.
losalbern
March 27, 2001 - 10:25 pm
Perhaps the answer to Amtraks financial woes might be to arrange to have some European nation bomb the heck out of our railroads like we did theirs and then give us money to rebuild them. Isn't it a bit ironic that it was our tax dollars that rebuilt their railway system to a state of excellance far greater than our own and yet ours were allowed to just go to pot for lack of funds?
Ginny
March 28, 2001 - 04:59 am
Losalbern, I didn't realize that, so that's where the reparation money went?
Fascinating, the things you learn here.
On another unconnected subject, last night on the news (it's amazing how when you read about something everything you see connects to it) came a spot on an 88 year old man in Clinton, SC, not too far from me, who has spent 27 years building this train.
I apologize for this awful snowy photo, it's hard to snap and hold the antenna on the TV in the kitchen, but even tho he seems to have become a ghost in this photo, barely discernible by his dark shadow to the right of the train, I think you can see this is a pretty darn good model and it runs, too.
Labor of Love.
Of course he referred to it by number, he said it was a....whatever, can't remember 4-8-8-0 or something.
We've, so sorry, gotten a little slack with our chapters here and I recommend we begin Chapter 9 today and stick to the schedule, so if you like, please go ahead and post any thoughts on Chapter 9 and I hope to be in later on, what were some questions or thoughts you might have had....This weekend my oldest son was trying to puzzle out why a green light seemed to be showing on the opposing tracks when a train comes thru, so he got the book showing the signal tower and read about the signal flags....seemed to understand even if I didn't. hahahaha
Lots of train talk in Pauline!
ginny
Ann Alden
March 28, 2001 - 06:06 am
Ginny,I am still having trouble loading this site. Many reloads required. Any ideas?
Ginny
March 28, 2001 - 06:17 am
Ii don't have a clue, Ann. We took everything in the heading out once and it seemed to do no good. You wouldn't be on Netscape by any chance would you? Many have commented in Problems that apparently the banners at the top of the page have coding that Netscape can't handle. Tehre's nothing in our heading here that should cause a problem, are you having the same problem with all of the discussions?
Are you using subscriptions?
If you are, don't.
Just come to the main B&L page and look down for this discussion and see if that hurts or helps??
ginny
Ginny
March 28, 2001 - 06:18 am
This morning it IS slow, by the way? All of the discussions are slow to load? They seem almost to hang up?
ginny
Henry Misbach
March 28, 2001 - 12:19 pm
Ginny, I came across a good blown-up picture of the rail-laying process that explains some things. The ties are laid first. Besides, it appears that the ballast was supplied as they went along. Also, the ties can't be more than 8" to a foot apart. So the horses, pulling the rail wagon, have a fairly even surface on which to work. The picture is in something called, "Railroads of the West," don't recall the author's name. Saw it in our B&N.
FaithP
March 28, 2001 - 05:24 pm
I do not find the site slow. Perhaps it is that people have not emptied cache frequently or something. This page loads speedily along with all the others. There was a time a few weeks ago when something was wrong but now it seems fine. Faith
Harold Arnold
March 28, 2001 - 08:02 pm
From Message #442
Isn't it a bit ironic that it was our tax dollars that rebuilt their railway system to a state of excellance far greater than our own and yet ours were allowed to just go to pot for lack of funds?
But the lack of funds to finance a state-of-the-art national railway system was arguably the result of the lack of passengers. Americans were just too much in love with their autos, and early in the post war period President Truman announced his plan for Federal support of a National Highway network. In the post WW II period U.S. subsidies went into the Highways and the railroads languished. It may not have been the wisest decision, but it was our choice.
Also the American choice to support a National Highway system rather than Railroads had some justification because of the generally greater distances and much lower population densities throughout much of the country. For distance travel Americans found air transportation much faster and certainly more convenient.
On the question of U.S. aid financing European Railways, U.S. aid immediately after the war was quite generous, but after 1955 it was mostly military aid to support NATO and the defense of Western Europe against communism.
Ginny
March 29, 2001 - 05:19 am
Good points, Harold, so nice to see you back again, is your computer fixed now??
Henry, WHAT???? You LEFT it there? Is it that one with the brown cover? Back I go today, because I'm totally flummoxed and feeling a bit stupid over this, I know they did that, I don't know how. Thanks for the head's up!!
Today we begin Chapter 9. I loved Chapter 9. So many great things in it!!
A contest, who can go farther fastest? Such fun. So American (as Ambrose said, "for real!") haahahaha
Lots of points here, putting some in the heading, looked all over EVERYWHERE for a photo of the Blue Goose the engine they dragged on sleds, a foot a day, wouldn't you KILL to see a photo of that, don't you LOVE the concept?
How about those Cornish Miners vs the Chinese? Wow!!
"East of Reno..desolation becgan to assume its most repulsive form. Miles on miles of black, igneous rock and volcanic detritus. OUrcrops of lava, interspersed with volacnic grit were the main features."
Wow. Have any of you seen this?
My first flight to LA took us over such amazing just amazing landscapes nearing CA that I was aghast. Such a mighty country, such changes in landscape. You really need to take the train out and the plane back from LA to see the amazing configurations of this country and it's vastness.
Labyrinths under the snow and the photos of the mighty snow plow, ("ten feet wide, eleven feet high, and thirty feet long") that's not a fair race, is it?
How about the division of labor in the Big Four, all of whom were supremely satisfied, do you think that poor Judah's problem was that he simply didn't have a niche in all those awful egos?
Golly moses, "Water for men and animals was hauled 40 miles," with photo of the trains hauling same.
I believe Ambrose is right, Nothing Like it in the World (except for the Pyramids, maybe or Stonehenge?)
We're a little behind in our schedule, I'm going to change it, I found Chapter 9 refreshingly brief and interesting, our journey here is like the railroad? Which side are we on? Are we the UP (I can remember that from Union being the North) or the CP cutting thru tunnels and mountains??
Wonderful photo in the book of the grading of the line? The tracks going up hill, did you see it?
ginny
Ginny
March 29, 2001 - 06:09 am
Losalbern here we are with the politicans selling their votes, what a sentence, what does this SAY about how we perceive politicians then and now??
I've put a new schedule in the heading, this chapter was short and sweet.
What did you think about it? I'm going to view the SC Railroad museum on spring break with a teacher friend and will report ALL here when I get back if I can drag self away, that is!
Train FEVER!!!!!!
ginny
Ann Alden
March 29, 2001 - 06:45 am
Still having trouble, Ginny and I can't figure out why. No matter what I do, it loads halfway and stops and grinds along forever and never gets fully loaded until I reload, maybe several times. No, I quit the subscription long ago and do get on the way that that you suggested. Yes, I am on Netscape and am getting ready to upgrade to version 6.01. That might help, but who knows!
patwest
March 29, 2001 - 06:52 am
Mention of the recent derailment... Happened about 45 miles west of here... The repair of the track in that section was an ongoing thing... and crews (out of Galesburg,IL) worked on it.
My daughter came recently from Denver on that track and she said it was very rough... and said the train seemed to just creep along... as result her train was 2 hours late....
Ginny
March 29, 2001 - 06:57 am
NO ANN, no no, don't do Netscape 6, it's AWFUL, no no, I had to remove all the Netscapes from my own system because of it. Please don't.
It's a BEta version and if you look at our Computer Sections here on SeniorNet, everybody hates it! NO NO!
hahahah
Try IE, you have a version on your computer already if you have Windows, try IE!! Internet Explorer....
ginny
patwest
March 29, 2001 - 07:02 am
Ann... the new IE 5.5 loads faster for me than the 4.5.. and is a free download.
Ann Alden
March 29, 2001 - 07:31 am
Okay, here I am, on IE 4.5 and will be downloading 5.5 later but it just came right up so it must be Netscape! Too bad, as I like their whole setup better. Talk to you later!
FaithP
March 29, 2001 - 09:38 am
Well I was born in Reno, lived at Tahoe City in the heart of the Sierra nountains till I was 14, then in Auburn for highschool and after I married back to live in Reno. I have driven or been driven over that summit rd every year from Sacramento Valley to Reno for at least 50 years, when they improved the highway and now call it 880 instead of the old 80, I drove it myself for a long time. I also have taken the train very often over the summit and it is a wonderful thing to do. My mom took us kids from Auburn to Reno by train just for fun trips and to visit relatives. I have traveled it in the winter too and that is scary to me. The only other trip to compare was up the long winding railway from Ogden to Peublo Colorado one time. faithp
losalbern
March 29, 2001 - 05:46 pm
Harold: Of course there were several factors involved in the decline of rail travel in the U.S. But I can recall a statement made in that era that as far as the U.S. railroads were concerned, there was more profit to be made in shipping a hog to market than there was transporting a passenger the same distance. And so it seems that more attention was given the hogs. One reason that our traveling public chose other modes of transportation other than rail was that the level of service provided began to decline without any indications of plans for improvement. Train service today does not compare well with the level of service given in the '30s. A nation as great as this one should not have to settle for a second class railway system, don't you agree?
Harold Arnold
March 29, 2001 - 07:54 pm
Losalbern, Also Air passenger service today does not compare well with Air service in the 60's & 70's
Ginny, Negative on the desktop. I fear a new disk format and reinstallation of Windows will be the only out. I talked to Dell Technical Hilp yesterday but got no where. I have too many things going to spent the time necessary now. It will brobably be a couple of weeks before I try.
The following is a link to pictures of the 1881 burial site of five Chinese Rail Road construction workers apparently killed on the job in North Texas. It would seem the Chinese continued in the work after the completion of the CP/UP projct.
Burial Site
FaithP
March 29, 2001 - 07:55 pm
loslabern you echo my sentiments. I have always said Amtrack could make a profit but they proved me wrong I guess. They have added many sort of local trips between the Bay area and the Sacramento Valley and Of all their intrastate runs that is the most utilized.They keep taking trains out of service. Then of course their promotion a few years ago was to entice people to ride trains and Iguess it didnt pay off as you can't secure those 130.00 tickets with 4 stopovers/switch directions anymore. My daughter took one of those trips to Colorado stayed her layover time there and came home and that was an inexpensive trip. Did not include meals those were extra in the Dining car and she said they were just soso like airplane food. fp
Henry Misbach
March 29, 2001 - 08:03 pm
Ginny, the book in question is "Trains of the Old West," by Brian Solomon. It's primarily a picture book, but sometimes a picture is worth many thousand words.
Ann Alden
March 30, 2001 - 04:41 am
Thanks for the historical site of the Chinese Workers burial site. Its good that we keep people aware of our history. I knew that the Chinese workers also prepared the caves for wine making in Napa Valley but didn't realize that they also continued to do RR work even as far away as Texas.
Faith, I thought that Amtrak would make it also as a passenger entity and am much disappointed that they are going downhill. The RR in Canada, VIA, seems to be doing well. Service is wonderful when you go across the country. The trains are not new and show wear. We had our own compartment with toilet and washbowl. And, we spent quite a lot of time in the observation car, playing games and reading. Very relaxing. When you read the Amtrak ads for passenger service, they sound quite nice,too. And, their travel magazine is well done. I have been looking into doing a trip here. You can see what all they offer on the internet site for Amtrak.
williewoody
March 30, 2001 - 06:47 am
While I will agree that the onboard service is not quite as good as it was back in the 30's and 40's, still it is better I believe than on the airlines. IMHO The airlines have deteriorated far greater than AMTRAK. I have reached the point that I will not travel on the airlines unless it is an absolute necessity. I am fed up with being jammed in like a sardine, thrown a bag of peanuts like an elephant and forced to stand forever in long lines to check in at overcrowded airports. Admitedly, American and United Airlines are taking the passengers comfort into consideration finally.
But back to train travel. It is unfortunate that it is not as convenient as it used to be to be able to ride a train. And their on time performance is not good on most routes. For that matter neither is the airlines. In the case of AMTRAK it is not their fault in many instances. Because of poor track conditions they are forced to operate slow. This is because they do not own the tracks in most of the country. The freight railroads are required by law to maintain the tracks in good condition on the routes where AMTRAK operates. However, as in many other cases, the laws are not being enforced. Lets hope Mr Ashcroft starts to reverse the trends of the past 8 years or more.
Anyway I'll still take the train any chance I get.
losalbern
March 30, 2001 - 11:47 am
Harold.. When you come right down to it, I don't travel as well as I did in the 60's and 70's, no matter what the transportation mode is ! The thought of misplacing my stash of Rxs pills can ruin my day. I am a walking chemistry set. But you and WillieWoody are "right on" when you talk about air travel. I hate airports in general!
FaithP
March 30, 2001 - 12:21 pm
I always like to ride trains even short trips. The ride from Roseville to Sparks (the switching yards roundtables)is truly a historic ride. They tore down and replaced some of the snow sheds and overpass trestles, redoing tunnels etc in the 70 or thereabouts but the tunnels the original line had are still there.
As you rise through the pine forested mountains into the rocky granite upper reaches you begin to understand what an awsome task this was. My husband was a mining engineer(almost, short two semesters of graduation) and worked in mines off and on in his youth and when we first married. He loved being a "powder monkey" and often told wonderful stories of the mines he worked in. He was in absolute awe at the magnitude of the work done to tunnel the way through the Sierra's.
losalbern
March 30, 2001 - 04:04 pm
Ginny, I'm not too certain why you directed your question at me concerning Huntington's lobbying perusal of the Congress and his statement "I examined the face of every man...carefully through my glasses. I did not see but one man I thought would sell his vote." That is possibly the most sad statement made in this book. I am still recovering from the election fiasco last November.
Ginny
March 30, 2001 - 04:20 pm
Losalbern, so sorry, I thought you had mentioned it before way back there, so I thought you would be happy to see we finally got to it! Now it wasn't you, wonder who it WAS?? ahahah
Oh well Senior Moments!
Henry I got the book, it's wonderful more anon!
ginny
losalbern
March 30, 2001 - 10:35 pm
Ginnie, it was my clutch that slipped, not yours. You were absolutely correct. I did much earlier bring up that Huntington event in Congress where he found the one man who would sell his vote. And I had forgotten that earlier posting altogether. My apologies! I am so traumatized upon hearing how large a part that money plays in the role of government.
williewoody
March 31, 2001 - 07:04 am
BERNIE: Haven't you ever heard the saying "Money is the root of all EVIL."
Ann Alden
April 1, 2001 - 05:13 am
Faith
When you take a RR trip, short or long, what line are you taking? Is Amtrak our only passenger service? I rode the train out of Virginia City, a tourist train ride, but beautiful. I love that area of the country. My granddaughter is planning a move to Tahoe after graduation and I want to be able to tell her about the trains and their routes. She wants to be able to get to SF sometime while there. I assume that the train is still available.
williewoody
April 1, 2001 - 09:15 am
ANN: Other than tourist trains AMTRAK is the only passenger railroad in the country. I would suggest you go to www.amtrak.com for full information on AMTRAK routes, station stops, and timetables, and where to get schedules and ticket information. In short everything you need to know about AMTRAK operations.
MarjorieElaine
April 1, 2001 - 03:00 pm
Can I join this discussion now, even though I have only read the messages in the last couple of weeks? I have renewed the book at the library twice and have been reading. I grew up in Nebraska in the town of Fremont (see page 170) on the Platte River in Dodge County. We did not have Nebraska history in school when I was growing up. This book is so interesting to me--not just because it reminds me where so many of the names of locations came from in Nebraska--but because my grandparents and great-grandparents were among those early immigrants that took advantage of the trains to get out to central Nebraska to homestead. My grandmother was born in a sod house east of Grand Island. There was no lumber for building houses out there on that prairie! I cannot find the quote right now but somewhere Ambrose pointed out that the UP and Nebraska's history are intertwined. It certainly is. The railroads determined where the towns would be. And certainly made it possible for the immigrants to get out there sooner. What a challenge it must have been to step off that train and try to establish a life there!
About cottonwood--my first home until I was seven was on a farm northwest of Omaha about 35 miles. The house was built largely of cottonwood and had been standing maybe 20 years when I was born. The floors sagged even then and it was a big 2-story house. I finally had it torn down in the late 1980s. I can't believe it stood there all those years. Everybody always talked about how useless cottonwood was for building material. But isn't it amazing how they came up with things like Burnettizing the cottonwood and replacing the water with zinc solution to make railroad ties? Maybe our farm house was built with treated cottonwood lumber in it since it lasted so long.
I spent summers as a young child with the grandmother who was born in the sod house. She lived out west of Columbus. I remember in the 1930s there was a big effort to plant trees out there as windbreaks. They called them shelterbelts. Now when you drive across Nebraska there are trees sheltering most farmhouses from the winter winds. And those little railroad towns are still there, even though the railroads are not what they used to be and probably do not ever stop at many of them. But the towns still look so neat and well-maintained. Having lived in many other parts of the country, I still am amazed at how many of the houses in Nebraska built in the late 1800s are still standing and lived in and looking just as I remember them from my childhood--they were not built of cottonwood! Marge
Ginny
April 1, 2001 - 04:57 pm
Marge!! Yes, yes, Welcome, welcome!!
How beautifully you write, how it all comes alive just reading it!! Yes please do join us we're reading now in Chapter 9, but we're taking it at a very leisurely pace, a chapter a week, so you are more than welcome, tell us more about your family, that is fascinating.
I was thinking about the cottonwood tree itself, isn't it the one with the pendulous white flowers? Quite beautiful, actually? If these trees do not grow in Nebraska, what state DO they grow in? I think we have them here in SC.
This chapter was full of snow and snow plows and the book Henry has recommended has a photo of a snow plow that will blow your mind!! More tomorrow!
ginny
FaithP
April 1, 2001 - 07:31 pm
Marge what a good story to post for us to enjoy. I am well aware of the cottonwood shelterbelts. They are all over Nevada. California too.Ann.A. There are many short scenic railway trips for tourists available in CA and NV but the Amtrak out of Reno or Out of Truckee depending on what part of Tahoe you are in will run as long as there are railroads at all I would lay a bet on that. And the scenic part is the really best part of going from Reno down to San Francisco Area or a different longer but enjoyable trip runs from Reno over the summit and then down the Hwy 90 corridor South to Los Angelos area. These are time consuming trips however. Not fast. I can fly from Sacramento to Reno 40 minutes from taxi time down the field with leval air time about 10 minutes.It always makes me laugh the climb to 25,000 then a few minutes to look down on the peaks and the lakes and then they are decending to Reno Landing. On the train about 5+ hours. On the bus about 3+ but you do not see much anymore with the new 70 mile an hour straight freeway almost all the way from Sac to Reno just one little windy way left down Donner summit. 2+ hrs by car. I can leave Sacramento at 10 AM and be in Tahoe city at 11:45 in good weather. When I was a child in the 30's it was about 6 hours by car from Sacramento to Tahoe and up till about 35 a portion of the summit out of Cisco over the Donner pass was so steep my granddad turn the car around an backed up and scared me to death also it was dirt and gravel still . I do not remember when the rd was totally blacktopped but it was after I was about 8 years old because I remember the trip when we all remarked on the new road. That is when old hwy 40 out of Sacramento was lined with palm trees clear up past Roseville. A nice day trip is going in the back rds now and finding those old palms all in Residential and business corridors now. FP
MarjorieElaine
April 1, 2001 - 10:23 pm
I understand cottonwood trees can be found over much of the U. S.es. It is considered a weed tree because it is light, weak wood. It is easily damaged in a storm. The female tree produces seed with a cottony-coat and they can be blown in the wind for miles. Supposedly both male and female trees bloom but I do not think they are spectacular--I believe you are thinking of some other tree. They can grow to 100 feet tall and the roots are a problem because they can sprout new trees from the roots. However, the story in our book about them sprouting from the heat of a fire in a locomotive seems a little far-fetched to me.
When the people in Nebraska planted the trees in the "shelterbelts" for wind protection and to control erosion, they planted evergreens and hardwoods. But you cannot really eradicate the cottonwood.Marge
Ginny
April 3, 2001 - 05:38 am
I lost a post here somewhere but what I thought was a cottonwood obviously was not, by your descriptions! And after reading how they sucker, I don't think I want any, thank you all for those wonderful posts!
Losalbern, not to worry, I'll be crediting you with something you
didn't do before long! hahahahaa
Wow, Faith, that so exciting about Cicso (read ON!!) and the road being paved, wow wow, don't you feel like a part of history here? I do!! I've been on some roads in Nevada which were on mountains and not paved and was scared half to death, RECENTLY!
Nebraska was such a thrill to go across on the train west the first time I did it with the children, I don't think they'll ever forget it.
As our Bookfest (annual Gathering of Books & Lit people ) will meet in San Francisco next year , some of us, because of this discussion, have hit on the idea of taking the train, getting up some of those large compartments so all can visit.
I see in my books that a lot of the engines pictured are actually still in a museum in Sacramento, and I also see that the train does go thru Sacramento, so I plan to get off there and see the museum, unless it's at some ungodly hour, can't find the schedule, but it's the exact route we're talking about.
Many of the subjects of Chapter 9 were snow, the sheds, the problems?
The book Henry mentioned, Trains of the Old West, has some simply spectacular photos of the snow plows and mentions that it actually took several engines, running at full bore, to even PUSH those old plows, one of which is pictured in the Ambrose photos?
But you must see what they invented to combat this!!
The Leslie Rotary Plow! .
A Canadian called Orange Jull (no joke) invented the idea and assigned it to the Leslie brothers, who modified it and presented it to the world in 1885. It was an instant success. It only required ONE engine to propel it. Its whirling blades sliced through the snow, encountering no resistance and allowing traffic to flow. In 1887, the CP ordered one to clear the Donner Pass. Here is a photo of a similar plow, the "Caldwell Cyclone," ("no match for the Leslie") in action,
chewing up the snow, Isn't it fascinating? I don't recall the Leslie being mentioned in the book, do you all?
Ann, how are we doing holding up our end vis a vis your class?
Earlier we mentioned the historic train stoppage in 1952, but the text here and photos need to be seen, not just in a clickable!
The Donner Pass, in the Sierra, can get more than 200 inches of snow. In 1952, the City of San Francisco, the tracks having been cleared by a rotary plow, set out on the "same route surveyed by Theodore Judah some ninety years earlier."
There were no sheds and the blizzard conditions soon enveloped the train whose three Alco PA diesel electric engines could not free it.
A steam locomotive and rotary plow was dispatched from Norden but every attempt to free the train proved futile. Here is a very dramatic shot of the front of the stranded train The City of San Francisco snowbound
Winds were blowing in excess of 40 mph and snow continued to fall. A relief train came forward with an "army of men and shovels," but they were incapable of making significant progress despite their valiant efforts: it was just snowing too hard. Soon the train's steam generator, which provided heat to the passenger car, had to be shut down, and food supplies began to run low. As the snow continued to fall, it became impossible to reach the stranded train. A second rotary train had stalled. The engineer of a third rotary train had been killed in a derailment when his plow encountered a snow slide.
Brave men, in snowshoes killed overland from Cisco and Nyac to bring supplies to the crew and passengers.
Finally the storm ended, three days later, and the passengers were able to escape. A path was cleared along side the train and down to US Highway 40, which had been closed. The passengers were transported away but it would be three more days before they could free the train.
Still dangerous after all those years!!
Isn't that exciting?
ginny
williewoody
April 3, 2001 - 06:31 am
GINNY: About your San Francisco trip, if you are traveling south from Seattle you should arrive in Sacramento around early morning. That is assuming there has been no schedule change since I took that train just a couple of years ago. If you are coming the other direction I don't know what the arrival time would be in Sacramento. The California Railroad Museum,which is probably the finest in the country is within walking distance of the train station.
Over 1 million dollars was provided by the State of California to build the museum when Ronald Reagan was Governor.
Amtrak's Coast Starlite is the best train in their system. You should enjoy it. The best food , best service, and best equipment.
Ann Alden
April 3, 2001 - 06:57 am
I wonder if "Orange Julius, the juice stand business" was named after that man? Hahaha!
Since I had to cancel the Amtrak Starlight reservations that we had for going to Seattle a few years, I am glad to see that it is still available.
Ginny, should we be planning a train trip for B&L some year? What a hoot! We could all get on at our own stations(or closest one).
That snow chewer-upper was really ingenious, wasn't it?
Ginny
April 3, 2001 - 08:46 am
Thank you, Williewoody, for that information, near the station, HAH? well I'm for it!! What fun! I'm glad to hear that museum is worth seeing, too!
I'm going to see the one in SC run entirely by volunteers on April 9!
Ann, in 2002, that's when! We'll get on at our own stations (I'll have to fly to Chicago and start from there)...not sure when we reach CA because the only way I've ever gone is north in Reno to Seattle. I bet that route Williewoody talks of from Seattle to SF is fabulous riding!!
Our Sarah T who lives in San Fransisco is finding out when the Book Festivals are there and we can time our visit accordingly! But not in December, I don't fancy being stalled like that one above!
Let's go for it in 2002, it takes, if I remember correctly....not sure how long...it's overnight, tho.
hahahaha
Henry Misbach
April 3, 2001 - 09:19 am
From the general discussion, I gather that many of you still prefer rail to air travel. First, I'd like to say that I thoroughly enjoyed riding the "vista" car on my trips from Kansas City to the northern midwest. Since the other passengers seemed to view these as desired accommodations for mountainous terrain, I usually had my part of the train to myself, which is just how I liked it.
But another factor has intervened between, as a rough estimate, the mid-50's to the mid-80's. During that interval, the primary ground transport method has been personal automobile. In my experience, it has become increasingly obvious that anyone who travels unrestrained is taking a huge chance. And that's how one travels on a train at speeds that are inconsistent with any sudden deceleration. While I know that a really sudden deceleration on the train is made unlikely just by the momentum and sheer mass of it, I just don't trust it as much as I once did. Now, my father was like a professor I knew at Wisconsin who, in the mid-60's took a train to San Francisco. Dad would have taken one, too. But Dad never owned a car equipped with seatbelts.
On that same trip to San Francisco, I was glad to be able to go by air. After an intermediate scheduled landing, I got to experience an aborted take-off, not as bad in itself as one's concern about what might have happened. The airline in question seemed embarrassed and eager to make it up to us. While they fed us a fine dinner, it was frankly difficult not to see the railroads in an even worse light than before. The Chessie, or whatever line that was from Cincinnati in '62, could have cared less about the hell it put its riders through. Nobody even said, "I'm sorry this train lacks a proper diner car." That airline, by contrast, gave me a great dinner and a money clip they mailed me later, together with an apology. We had to wait an hour or so for another plane to be flown to us. Then, we bounded off to LA and were there in nothing flat. If I conceded Professor Post's point about rail travel, it was for the brief moment maybe when we were still on the stopped plane waiting for the cloud of shredded rubber and other junk soon to overtake us. The pilot, with perfect understatement remarked, "As you can see, we have not taken off." If Hollywood didn't sign him up for a comedian's job, they missed a rare one.
Ironically, I feel safer strapped in on an airplane than I do unrestrained on anything. And then, there's the convenience. A delay can be significant in the air, but surface is usually far more significant. And, as for the bus, to distort an old automotive joke: Nah, Yugo!
FaithP
April 3, 2001 - 10:13 am
Mighty interesting posts. I am thrilled that the Books and Literature meeting will be in my neck of the woods. I am only about 5 miles from the train museum here in Sacramento. I havent been there for a few years. I have a two year-old great-grand son that is crazy about trains so we are going this summer. My daughter takes the train to Portland which is the Seattle train too, and she leaves from Oakland I think and most of the trip up is daylight but her trip home is overnight and I dont know if that is the only schedule there is or if she chose it. She said most of the people on that train up were very much tourists looking at the country and would never have seen it either by car or air. That is what I like about trains too, the leisure of it. Faith
Ann Alden
April 3, 2001 - 03:06 pm
Well, we must see that museum in Sacramento. And, then, there is the cable car museum in San Francisco which is quite colorful and interesting. Maybe we should be planning on just traveling all summer or at least fall.
FaithP
April 3, 2001 - 08:13 pm
Ann when I was a little one my favorite thing was when my mom put me (or me and my little sis)on a bus to San Francisco, from Tahoe City and my grandmother and grandfather would meet me at the bus. Usually for a Dr. visit for glasses or teeth or both. And then some weekend fun though my Nana worked all day Saturday Granddad took me to movies, Flyshaker zoo and riding on cable cars just for fun. Then in the evening we would ride a street car to meet Nana and ride home with her. If my little sis was with me it was really fun and we might get up to theGolden Gate Park and definetly to China Town where my Nana loved to shop. Then back on the bus to go home which took from early morning to late afternoon. And we could not get off except two stops for bathroom and drinks of water. The stops were in Auburn and/or Truckee. We were told not to get out anywhere else and we didnt dare anyway. What a adventure. FP
williewoody
April 4, 2001 - 08:45 am
HENRY: Like I always say to each his own. Since you prefer being tied down when you travel, then the airplane or automobile is the way to go. Frankly, I prefer the train, where I have the freedom to move around. Personally, I have greater fear of an airplane crash, where there are usually no survivors, as opposed to the few who may be killed or even suffer injury in a train crash. Unfortunately, train availability is not too great in a large part of the country. At least not like it was 50 or 60 years ago. I have always said you can't be in any hurry if you are going to take a long train ride. Sit back and leisurely observe the scenrery, and enjoy the freedom to be able to get up and move around. Amtraks modern day cars are much more comfortable than were the former passenger cars operated by the old railroads. They are quieter and smoother running. That's progress in design and construction. I always take a compartment as I prefer the privacy. Plus meals are included in the price. On occasion I have even taken a short flight to get to a place where I can board a train for the long haul. Any way,like I said you pays your money and you takes your choice.
losalbern
April 4, 2001 - 12:13 pm
Faith, your posting #465, has set off a curiosity I never realized existed. This book would be pretty commonplace if it weren't for the trials the "Big Four" had getting their railroad through the Sierras and it is a wonder they ever managed to get it done at all. Now with your description of how good it is to travel between Sacramento and Reno, by gosh, I suddenly have a yearning to try that ride too. My wife and I love that region and have frequented Hwy 49 via car. So who knows, we just might talk ourselves into that little train trip. As Williewoody pointed out, might have to go dig up some roots somewhere!
losalbern
April 4, 2001 - 12:29 pm
HENRY : If I ever participated in an aborted take off in and aircraft, they might have to: 1) revive me, 2) pry my whitened knuckles off the arm rests 3) put my fine dinner in a bow wow bag for much, much later consumption and 4) put me into a cab for the nearest depot that utilized wheels for locomation. My sobs would have so unnerved the rest of the passengers, that flight might have been cancelled for the day.
FaithP
April 4, 2001 - 01:44 pm
losalbern if you frequent hw 49 then you should go over the Kit Carson pass from Jackson to Hope Valley and Markleville.I drove this the last time in 1991 on a vacation I took. I would not drive it in the winter. I have often said they should have put the train over this pass. But it is even more rugged than Donner Pass. You will love the ride over the Sierra's via Donner Pass especially after reading how that track got there in the first place. I am sure the reason the book evoked such intrest from me is that I live right here and have always and I have been involved with the railroad in sundry ways. FP
Ann Alden
April 4, 2001 - 01:46 pm
I can't resist this!! When my mother was reluctant to fly, I told her that at least if she crashed on a plane trip, she would be dead. With any other mode of travel, she would have the choice of being quadriplegic or having some other permanent injury. She took my advice and flew everywhere including flying with us in our little rented plane to Hilton Head, SC and all around the Midwest. Because she lost her fear, she was able to visit us wherever we lived, in Atlanta, Ohio or California. I am glad that I talked her into flying!
Henry Misbach
April 4, 2001 - 03:11 pm
Losalbern, I was in my twenties then, so I rode it out pretty well. It does take a considerable fuss to rein in, what, a 20 ton-or-so vehicle with too few wheels awkwardly placed from, oh, I'd say about 180 MPH, together with roaring engines reversed. I knew exactly that pilot's first impulse: to say, "Smell that?" But he immediately canceled that, figuring that some folks might take umbrage. I thought he showed remarkable composure. Although he said the reason was a red light on an engine, and that he could easily have made LA without one engine, both he and I might have viewed the mountain we had to go over to get there with the same respect.
It's certainly true that a good train can be a pleasant way to travel. I'd have a tough time improving on the Alps seen from a train that left Paris on time in the early morning. One reason I think trains have worked better "over there" is that the distances are not so great. But, even there, I once had to change from train to tour bus and back to train for some unspecified obstruction in Sicily. Tour buses in Italy can be a "trip." My wife and I rode one along a cliff road near Amalfi. The driver appeared to be practicing for the Targa Florio, hanging the bus out around curves like an XK. Looking down--way down--we could see the sea and not much else.
FaithP
April 4, 2001 - 09:04 pm
Henry that trip sounds so interesting. I love train trips and Riding the Iron Rooster is a wonderful Train book for all and sundry to read some time when lonesome for train talk and travel. Paul Theroux Author fp
Ginny
April 5, 2001 - 01:00 pm
Well now, Losalbern and All, we'll just have to seriously plan to have Books On Wheels for 2002 (isn't that a train configuration? ) haahahah, that would be SOME train 2-0-0-2 hahaaha
I must say here in the interest of TOTAL honesty that I know where Henry is coming from, that the ENTIRE time I was on the train from Chicago to Seattle with the kids I constantly worried about crashes (but that's just me). Every twitch and lurch, every single moment it seemed to slide sideways, I envisioned a crash, and where I would BE in that crash, but I do that on planes too, but it IS something that enters one's mind.
I have never in my life EVER gotten on a Ferris Wheel (something I avoid at pain of death anyway) without spending the ENTIRE journey planning which girder I'll step on when I get stranded at the top and have to climb down.
I remember I got trapped in an elevator in...London I believe it was and there were several people from different countries there including one lady from South America who apparently had severe claustrophobia...I assume that from her screaming. I myself don't have a lack of claustrophobia so after conversing with her for a bit she told me seriously and very panic strickenly "Is not good for me!"
I assured her I was in the same elevator and had been planning my escape through the roof ever since the thing began an ascent. That was the wrong thing to say.
But I think a train trip across the country to Sacramento and then on to San Francisco with other people on board you know would be magic, I suggest some of us try to go that way in 2002, just for nostalgia's sake if nothing else. And I believe I will take the Empire Builder back as it goes thru Montana and the Dakotas, both of which I have never seen.
When I took the children West last time several on the train had been on the Empire Builder and they were universal in their excitement and praise for that train and the sights you see.
Today being April 5, and my fingers having quickly erased April 2 and susbstituted April 6 in the heading, we'll go thru Chapter 9 by tomorrow, are there any last words on it today?
I love the richness of the experiences shared here, they are better than Chapter 8, that's for sure.
Faith, how far IS it from Sacramento by train to SF?
I love also the trains in Europe, always do Eurail and will in May, I just love trains, and Monday will see the SC Train Museum, completely manned by volunteers!
I found the concept of snowsheds interesting, I had really never heard of them before. I used to see snow fence when we lived in PA and NJ but haven't seen it much here, the most amazing thing here I've seen is in Tennessee where they have what look like fish nets on the sides of the mountains to stop rock slides. I wonder if a cowcatcher could knock off a rock??
Are trains easy to derail? What would be the least thing on a track which would derail a train??
Would anybody like to tackle the first part of Question #2, "This was Democracy at work," on page 313? Was that said facetiously or in seriousness, do you think??
I'm still wondering about question #1, were they that more open in those days??
ginny
FaithP
April 5, 2001 - 03:22 pm
What is a bill of Lading? Well I believe it to be a list of cargo contents and on a truck of course it is just that truck but on a train I think they have a seperate bill for each freight car loaded. Ships also always had a list of all items in the cargo and it was also called a Bill of Lading. This is used for myriad of purposes, for Instance Insurance, Inventory, Proof of transport, Proof item was loaded, Proof item was delivered.You can think of more I am sure. Bookkeepers could not exist without them. They also are wonderful to read in old history books or when researching old records to see just what was shipped. Faith
losalbern
April 5, 2001 - 05:45 pm
One of the things we haven't mentioned about this Chapter 9 is the switching from black powder explosives to that of Nitroglycerin, something of a rather large shift in procedure. The use of Nitro was new to most everyone one involved and certainly required special handling by the Chinese workers. That stuff is touchy business to handle. I suppose they learned the hard way. I'm glad it was'nt me to do what they had to do everyday. Black powder is bad enough but Nitro is really dangerous. I presume that the Nitro was in liquid form , not in the form of dynamite which is modified Nitro.
williewoody
April 7, 2001 - 09:30 am
Pages 214 through 216 present a glimpse of the problems the builders had with the native indians. Following is a rather gruesome story about one of the incidences as told in another source book.
A band of Cheyenne indians under chief Turkey Leg were traveling along an ancient trail when they came upon the Union Pacific's tracks near Plum Creek, Nebraska. The date was August 6th 1867. They were trying to avoid contact with the Army troops who were looking for them.
The indians made a barricade of loose ties wired together with telegraph wire from nearby poles. Then they waited for a train to come along.
When they tore down the telegraph wire, the operator at Plum Creek realized the line was down. The station master, William Thompson, an Englishman with long blonde hair, loaded a spool of wire, repair tools, and six Spencer rifles, and took 5 section hands on a hand pump car and went looking for the break. They ran into the barricade after dark and were spilled all over. The Cheyenne jumped them and killed all but Thompson. He was knocked to his knees. Before he could stand up he felt a searing pain and realized his long blonde hair was being lifted.
He saw the indians drop his scalp as they left the scene. Thompson crawled over and retrieved his scalp and stuffed it into his pocket.
Meanwhile, the indians worked to improve their barricade, using Thompsons tools, they removed two rails. Along comes the night train from the east. The engineer saw the barricade too late and plowed right into it. The fireman was thrown into the open firebox and was killed instantly. The engineer was killed by the indians. Back in the caboose the rest of the train crew jumped out and ran off toward Plum Creek. Before they get there, they manage to flagdown a second train and stop it in time to avoid further tragedy.
Back at the wrecked train the indians found a barrel of whiskey and settled down to a night of revelry. Meanwhile, Thompson reaches Plum Creek and is able to get on a train to Omaha, which was some 250 miles away. Upon arrival he received medical treatment.
Dr. C.P.Moore realized Thompson's scalp, a 7 inch by 9 inch section was too badly mauled to be reattached. A newspaper writer, Henry Stanley,of later fame for discovering Dr. Livingston in Africa, interviewed Thompson who survived his sudden attack of baldness. Because of this incident, which became known as the Plum Creek Massacre, more troops were sent to protect the railroad builders.
This was only one story among hundreds of attacks and battles fought with the native Americans. So the Union Pacific had more than construction and money problems to worry about. Incidentally,the Central Pacific seemed to have no indian problems. Can anyone tell why?
FaithP
April 7, 2001 - 12:04 pm
California and Nevada did not have the same type of Indian problems as the plains did. To tell the truth the Indians had been more or less subdued in California by the Spanish especially the Friers, who had been here for two hundred years before the eastern whites came for the gold. The tribes in very northern counties where the last to have battles which took place later in history. Trinity -Modoc- Humbolt-were the scene of some bloodshed and the historic battle of Captain Jack of the Modoc.
Other train route over Sierras goes through Orville then up the canyons to Susanville and back down to Reno. Known as the Feather River Route over the Sierras, it is spectacular and I have been over it one time from Sacramento to Reno. I must say the bus trip is very scary over that route. On the train they have those observation cars so people can really see what is there as they climb up through the granite pass. I have not read much about this route and its building. Maybe I need to go find out more about it. Faith
williewoody
April 8, 2001 - 06:26 am
FAITH: You are right. There were fewer indians in the Sierras and California, and they had been pretty much subdued by the time the railroad was being built. It was the large bands of plains indians that were fighting the incurrsion of the white man into their lands. Actually, the railroad split the buffalo herds, which would not cross the tracks. Of course, the buffalo was the main source of food, clothing and shelter for the indian, so in effect they were fghting for their lives.
Ginny
April 8, 2001 - 07:36 am
Williewoody, Faith, and Losalbern, thank you so much for those interesting posts, that Nitro stuff
was wonderful, remember those old cowboy movies about it? I myself used to be vaguely afraid of it and now we can see first hand WHY. Thank you both so much!
Williewoody, that is some story, is there somewhere we can read others? Are you aware that it's been said that it was the white man who taught the indian to scalp? That seems bizarre to me, the whole thing seems bizarre and slightly ucky!
Faith, great point on the Spaniards, and I believe I would like to hear more about that route, myself, that sounds like an interesting side trip.
I do apologize to all of you for my always being behind here, I love hearing your stories and learning so many new things.
Please feel free to comment on Chapter 10 till I can get it up later this afternoon and WE WILL BE BACK ON TRACK! hahahaha
Railroad metaphors abound.
Unfortunately I will not be able to visit the SC Railroading Museum tomorrow as it's only open alternate Saturdays starting in May, remember this enterprise is entirely volunteer driven, which, like our Books & Lit here, makes it especially special to me.
Alert!! Those of you interested in the American Indian will NOT want to miss an upcoming PBS show (please check YOUR local listings, it's on Sunday the 22nd on the North Carolina 33 channel but they tend to run a couple of weeks behind?) called:
American Masters: Coming to Light: Edward S. Curtis and The North American Indians
A profile of the complicated life of Edward Sheriff Curtis who spent 30 years of his career attempting to record every Native American tribe in the West.
His goal was to reveal how they lived prior to their contact with the white man.
This special tells of the many struggles he went through to achieve his goals, which untimately cost him his financial security, family, and health.
THAT is one I want to see! Never HEARD of him, have you?
Harold, hope your computer is back to normal, so aggravating to have computer troubles!
ginny
FaithP
April 8, 2001 - 10:12 am
Well I certainly have heard of Curtis. We would have lost the "face" of the American Indian totally if not for him. However by the time he did his work all the american indian tribes were on reservations or being assimilated into american culture. Many of his works were done in studios with props etc. so he is not always portraying an accurate picture still it is wonderful to leaf through his pictures and read the captions for a glimpse into the past. He publishe 20 volumns of his Work The North American Indian. I only own 2 books which are a compilation out of the whole works and issued by the Smithsonian. I have leafed through most of his works in the library as a young woman.
The caption"One Sky Above Us" which I have been using for the last week (even before I knew Ginny would post about the tv show)is from one of his pictures of an Indian in prayer-"When ever the white man treats the Indian as they treat each other, then we will have no more wars. We shall be alike, brothers of one father and one mother, One Sky Above Us One country around us, and one government for all" a prayer of Chief Joseph's of the Nez Perce'1830 to 1904
Ginny
April 8, 2001 - 10:15 am
FAITH!! That gave me chills! One Sky Above Us! Chills!!
Thank you for that, I will not miss this one, never heard of the man, wonder if they will take up his staged photos? I'm learning so much in this thing, thanks to you all!
ginny
williewoody
April 8, 2001 - 01:26 pm
The outside source I referred to, I have mentioned before. The book is titled WHAT THEY DIDN'T TEACH YOU ABOUT THE WILD WEST by Mike Wright. He has written several other "What they didn't teach you" books, but thus far I have only read the "Wild West" one. I like his writing very much as he is true to form when he relates stories about many famous people of the West. Stories that I do not recall ever hearing. He devotes a full chapter to the building of the transcontinental R.R.
Ginny
April 8, 2001 - 07:00 pm
Thank you for that, Williewoody, does he mention Hell on Wheels towns at all? I found those fascinating and have put a photo of Main Street, Cisco in the late 1800's from the book in the heading. I confess I have spent quite a bit of time studying those old photos and reading their captions, when did photography begin? I am so grateful for those old photos.
This Chapter 10 has so many unusual statements in it and colorful people and events that I've only chosen a few quotes to put in the heading to see if you all had any reactions at all? Or if you had something of interest you wanted to comment on in this section.
I have two things:
Which tribe of Indians was considered the fiercest in the old west? Was it the Sioux? Or the Apache? Or neither one?
The quote in the heading about Dodge assuring people that Professor Agassis in 1867 had said that the "rain followed the tracks," it would "come by 'the disturbance of the electrical currents, caused by the building of the Pacific railroad.'"
I guess to our sophisticated ears that sounds ridiculous, or does it? Did you all catch the news quite recently in the newspaper that the city of Atlanta actually causes thunderstorms itself?. Something about it generates so much heat that the heat sucks up the cold air when it moves away and then dumps it in the form of tremendous storms, it's been written up quite a bit?
How about the strange I-85 corridor in South Carolina and probably you have similar tales of where you live, in which storms seem to run right along I-85? In fact many times I-85 seems to be the dividing line between snow and, more horribly, tornadoes often run up that corridor.
Aren't there "tornado alleys" out west? Are they connected to anything on the ground?
Now we know that the train tracks did not bring rain....don't we?
hahaahha
ginny
Ginny
April 9, 2001 - 04:37 am
Faith, thank you for the Bill of Lading explanation, I wonder if that's what is on the sides of the cars sometimes? The railroad cars?
I'm going to look up the derivation of the word "lading," reminds me of loading/ laden and see if anything interesting develops there!
ginny
williewoody
April 9, 2001 - 07:19 am
GINNY: A few comments on some of your questions. Actually, it would be difficult to say which were the fiercest indians. They all were fighting to save their space. And incidentally, in the past they fought each other for the same reasons. Just a side thought, during WWII many indians served in the Armed Services, and they were some of the toughest fighters still.
I don't know the scientific reasoning why the rain would follow the railroad track. There may be some connection between electrical forces in rain cells in the clouds being attracted to metal, and certainly railroad tracks are metal. Dodge's comment probably had more to do with attracting people, partcularly farmers, who are dependant on rain to move west and buy railroad land.
losalbern
April 9, 2001 - 10:04 am
The book's . discussion about cold weather on the Plains reminded me of why I left Nebraska winter weather behind me over 50 years ago for sunny Southern California. The wind sweeping along those Plains with nothing to deflect it is awesome in its ability to be chillingly cold. Makes one admire how the Indians managed to survive living in such primitve housing facilities. As for building a railroad in that kind of weather, forget it! By the way, last weekend Nebraska endured just that kind of windstorm that blew over a church steeple in Omaha.
Ginny, The Sioux Indians must have impressed a lot of folks who lived in or near Sioux City or Sioux Falls . But I cant think of any towns named after the Apache. Can you?
losalbern
April 9, 2001 - 10:08 am
I really got a charge out of that picture Ginny posted of main street Cisco. It must have been difficult to cross that street with a clean pair of shoes.
williewoody
April 9, 2001 - 12:52 pm
BERNIE: There are two places named Apache. One is in the far south east corner of Arizona just west of the New Mexico Line. The other is Apache Creek located in the Apache National Forest in central western New Mexico in the Apache National Forest near the Arizona border. No doubt they probably only have a handful of residents as they are located on back roads, not near any dense population areas.
I am no expert on indians, but I would suspect that the Sioux tribe was a much larger tribe than the Apache who lived in pretty desolate country.
Harold Arnold
April 9, 2001 - 02:51 pm
Ginny in message 501 asked:
Which tribe of Indians was considered the fiercest in the old west? Was it the Sioux? Or the Apache? Or neither one?
Let me add a comment to the the several excellent replies to this question. I would certainly hesitate to give a judgment answer to the question by naming a particular tribe. I don't believe real professional Indian historians would do so either.
I think, as Williewoody has pointed out, that all would fight to defend their space, if they had the opportunity and a decent chance of success. I think also that just about all, more-or-less embraced a life code that honored warfare and elevated the warrior to positions of honor in tribal society. That code was very different from the code of Europeans who would never understand the wontedly cruel acts and ceremonial torture that so often accompanied Indian military operations. (Of course their ancesters, who a thousand plus years earlier caused the downfall of Rome, did much the same things).
Readers interested in pursuing this further might be interested in reading some of the early Journals of 16th century Europeans or the Francis Parkman classic entitled something like, "La Salle and the Opening of the West."
Based on my limited reading regarding California Indians, I suspect many were a bit more peacefully inclined than their Plains and Eastern counterparts. Many practiced a simple gathering culture in a land both provident and temperate. This led to a laid back "California" state of mind at a time when population and other 21st century excess had not yet created the many current problems. I have the impressions that these Indians were more exploited by the Spanish Missionaries than the Indian in a similar position in South Texas.
Ginny, the desktop is still down. I have too many other things going now to begin the recovery. I will put an appropriate report on one of the Senior's Net Computer Boards when I begin. For the next month, I will be using the Dell Notebook. Yesterday I repaired my telephone connection to the Gazebo so I can now work in my outdoor summer office in a wonderfully mild South Texas spring.
FaithP
April 9, 2001 - 02:53 pm
The Sioux were a nation made of 5 tribes- Sac, Fox, Oglala, and I will have to look up the others. The Apache were several tribes also and from several different territories. I learned all this long ago and in order to comment properly I really should go look it up again. But as far as fierce fighters are concerned I seem to remember that all the Indian tribes gave way before the Crow as they were very fierce and never gave up as they were sort of "Kamakazi" types. The Sioux nation gathered together many if not all of the plains people to make that last stand that is so famous and their anger had been brewing for 20 years because of the telegraph first and then the railroad, which once and for all took away their land, food and their nations.. Faith
losalbern
April 9, 2001 - 07:48 pm
Harold, that idea of having an outdoor summer office in your gazebo
sounds very appealing to me. It appears as though you intend to spend a lot of time there this summer. Fantastic!
williewoody
April 10, 2001 - 09:19 am
HAROLD: I hope that gazebo is air conditioned. I don't know anyplace in Texas that you could spend a summer outside of an airconditioned house. As a kid, before air conditioning I lived in West Texas about 6 months. At the time I thought I had died and gone to hell. And after 35 years in east Texas I have had similar thoughts whenever I have been outside for any length of time in the summer.
FaithP
April 10, 2001 - 03:30 pm
They are predicting much less use of AirConditioning for California or severe blackouts, this year and maybe for many years in the west. We have an energy shortage and when it is hot out here it is terrible and I remember the years before I had airconditioning of any kind in my house and it was bad. Maybe that is why my mom lived at Tahoe so long, not too hot up there. Fp
Ginny
April 11, 2001 - 06:25 am
It was 90 here yesterday, not sure if I could exist without air conditioning!
HAROLD, there you are in your gazebo!! I love the way you write about history and thank you for those perepectives on the different Indians.
Like Faith, I remember being taught about the Indians, but in our case it was the "extremely peaceful Lenape Indians, " (a tribe I bet you all never heard of??) of Ner Jersey I think or another equally strange named one in Pennsylvania who were peace loving and very quaint as they were presented to us with their lean tos and hogans and strange strapped conveyances on horseback.
We spent more time learning of them than we did the Civil War with the result that up into my adulthood (should I admit this in public?) I thought Gettysburg (which I have no excuse, having visited it many times) was of the Revolutionary War like the rest of the area I grew up in. I can tell you that George Washington really slept around, every house where I'm from claimed he slept THERE! hahahaha
Losalbern, I'm just bemused, too, by that photo, traffic jam in 1867, you know crossing that street WOULD have been quite an undertaking!!
Thank you all for the different information on the Indian tribes, Williewoody, I didn't know there was an Apache, anywhere! And, Faith, now that you have mentioned Crows, I can't get them out of my mind, the crow itself is a nasty bird.
Don't they all have interesting names?
I was also struck by those "Hell on Wheels " towns and the number of women to men in the beginning, those must have been SOME kind of women, I can't imagine it. I'm wondering this morning how accurate you think some of our Westerns used to portray life in the old West?
Gunsmoke?
I LOVE the quote in Question #3, just love it. I love that wry way they used to express themselves. When I read in the book that the report was of 700 Sioux on the ridge, I almost got angina, can you IMAGINE what that felt like?
How it might have felt to be a homesteader and look our your window and see that clattering into your yard?
What strength these people had!
(Do you know that in the old photos they often posed next to what mattered the most to them?) And in most cases it was water or some conveyance for water? You can't manufacture water out of nowhere?
Do you know why they almost NEVER are seen with a big toothy grin? It's because their teeth were a mess!
Really!!
Harold is the inheritor of fabulous archival never before seen photos and I've asked if some of our tech team in the Books could look on his Home Page and see if he has any mounted yet (it's a project of his) of town life. Harold if you know where one might be or if you have one, we'd love to see it, it would be very exciting. I've thought all along we MUST do something so you can all see Harold's photos.
Meanwhile I guess we can picture him in his gazebo!
ginny
Ginny
April 11, 2001 - 06:35 am
I JUST reread Williewoody's earlier post and caught this:
"A band of Cheyenne indians under chief Turkey Leg..."
Now there's a name? Chief Turkey Leg. We have wild turkeys here and I expect that applies to the swiftness and cunning of the wild turkey?
ginny
williewoody
April 11, 2001 - 08:53 am
Ambrose tells about the Plum Creek Massacre (pg 222 and 223). Although his story is somewhat different in details than the one I related from Mike Wright's book. For example he says the indians were led by Chief Pawnee Killer, rather than Turkey Leg as I reported. Also that two trains were wrecked rather than only one. No mention is made of the station agent Thompson who was scalped and escaped back to Plum Creek. Interesting.
Now who's right? Probably both. It's all based on what someone remembers. Just like in so many court trials, witnesses have different versions of what happened. No wonder how it is so difficult to convict the guilty, and sometimes inocent people are convicted by mistake.
losalbern
April 11, 2001 - 03:07 pm
I recall reading many moons ago a brief article that discussed the era when the British and French forces were fighting over which nation would claim Canada as their colony. The British hired one of the local Indian tribes for their tracking and fighting attributes. This tribe was given the go-ahead to raid and kill any of the enemy forces including those folks who homesteaded in French territory. One device that was used, according to this article, was to pay a bounty to the Indians for any scalp they could provide to show their killing prowess. And so it would seem that taking of scalps was a British idea that caught on throughout the Indian tribes very quickly. Have anyone of you heard similar stories?
FaithP
April 11, 2001 - 03:25 pm
I have just reread the pages re: Hell on Wheels towns and thought of two thousand men and "a couple a dozen" women?Whoa! Also read that Dodge was upset that these people took the land he set aside for the UP and he sent a train force into Julesburg to clean it up.When the gamblers refulsed to pay Casement order his force to open fire not caring whom they hit.Dodge was evidently pleased when Sherman sent up two companies for protection. The railroad was now dominating the news and the rumors were flying. I think there may be many versions of every story not just the Plumcreek story. This chapter is where I realized that the railroad made Wyoming a state and Chyenne a town, a railroad town which it remains to this day.
Can you picture the trains pulling those cars that were blazing away with the hay burning. I thought this was an amazing chapter. The country itself being so wild and as hard to go through as much of the Sierra but I am not at all familiar with that country as I am with the Sierra passes so it seems as bad or worse. It was much more fearful re: Indians and bandits. Faith
williewoody
April 12, 2001 - 07:42 am
I must agree with Faith, this was indeed the most interesting chapter thus far. You begin to see how important it was to the United States to complete that railroad. It would open up the entire west to settlement and growth. Hollywood has such a reputation for embelishing on stories. But in the case of the development of the west I have an idea that they may not be too far off the mark in many of their movies about the subject.
FaithP
April 12, 2001 - 12:39 pm
I think that is right Williewoody, and my mother swore by the western writer Louis Lamour. She having heard all about the west from her grandparents who were born in the 1840's, and who traveled that railway to get west:Mom was very grounded in living western history and said Lamour captured the west very well and perhaps better than "formal history".I haven't read many of his books but she did read almost all of them and in old age had the talking books.
I think Stephen Ambrose did capture a feeling of excitement and the grand expansion that was to follow is pushing right against his words especially in this and the next chapter. Faith
williewoody
April 12, 2001 - 04:27 pm
I agree Faith. I read this book once cover to cover, but I m getting much more out of it the second time, because I am reading it more carefully and referencing other material to suppliment Ambrose's material plus what others have to offer here.
FaithP
April 12, 2001 - 09:13 pm
That is just the way I did it. And of course it took me quit a while to read the first time through as I had that eye problem. Will be very pleased when I get fitted for glasses to bring my eyes into focus now that one sees so much (20/20) and the other is way off now. Used to be the other way ...O I meant to tell you fellas that the main street of Cisco isnt much different now. There is a couple of brown shingled buildings with resturant and store etc. and a lot of the area has been turned into one of those camp grounds you buy shares in. fp
Ginny
April 13, 2001 - 03:06 am
I wish I had a photo of the main street of Cisco now, Faith! I agree with you and Williewoody, this is an interesting chapter and the very spectre of a train on fire must have been something to see.
This entire section seems larger than life and I'm glad you all are enjoying our leisurly ...can we say train ride through it? And tomorrow we're off again to Chapter 11.
Losalbern, I had likewise heard something about the scalps thing not originating with the Indians, but where on earth would the British have ever come up with such a hideous idea? I must admit that the "green " scalp made me queasy here.
I've never read a Louise Lamour but we did have a call in another discussion to read a biography of him. It's good to know that he did capture the feeling of the old west as it was. I had a Mobile Meals recipient who read Lamour until his death and I always meant to get a copy, maybe now I will, and see.
One thing's for sure, it was some kind of time, wasn't it? I'm not sure I would have survived it, personally.
I did not realize that Cheyenns, Wyoming was such a railroad Mecca and now am on fire to go see these old engines, did I understand that right? That are kept there? Who knew? I've already learned a great deal from this book.
The issue in Question #5, tho we have mentioned it before, seems to be of startling importance to me, I just can't imagine being at the point where the water starts flowing to the Pacific! Can you straddle this area? Can you see with your own eyes the water running now east, now west? What was that poem we memorizes so long ago? That all rivers run surely to the sea?
Fascinating, it really is. Any last thoughts on Chapter 10 before we move to Chapter 11 tomorrow?
ginny
FaithP
April 13, 2001 - 10:09 am
I have stood at the big sign in Colorado going from Denver down to Utah, don't know the no. of the highway.Sign says The Continental Divide Here and yes you can "staddle" it at this place. I think the next big place down the mountain was Glenwood Springs. Of course crossing from Chyenne to Rawlings I believe we went over it too. I was so young when we made these trips back and forth in 46/47 from Colorado to California. We also made the train trip from Auburn to Leadville which was a real experience. Going up to 14,000 ft from utah at about 4000 we could watch the back end of the train coming up the curves behind us. My little girl was 4 and entranced by that, seeing the end of the train behind us on the curves. You had to be there.fp
MarjorieElaine
April 14, 2001 - 12:35 am
Has anyone else noticed how much their perspective has changed on when "long ago" is? Since this is SeniorNet, I can admit this. I remember when the Barbara Stanwyck movie came out and everyone in Fremont was excited--but to me as a child that was all ancient history.
Now at my current age, the building of the railroad was not that long ago. I realize that I made my last trip on the Union Pacific route, going from Fremont to Salt Lake City in 1955. That was only 86 years after the railroad was completed. Now it seems sad that the great days of the transcontinental railroads were so short for most of us passengers. I made that trip in 1955 alone with a baby just 1 year old and a toddler who was 2 1/2. Back then it seemed like the railroads had been there forever and would keep on stopping in Fremont forever too. I had no concept then of what ingenuity and backbreaking work and sacrifice had gone into the building of the railroads. I had no concept that that was how Nebraska came to be--the land grants, the towns along the tracks of the UP and subsequent railroads.
This is such a drmatic story--it made such a difference in all of our lives. And yet railroads were superseded so soon by those other inventions such as the automobile and the airplane. That final paragraph in Chapter 10 (p.229) where Dodge was predicting what a difference the railroad was going to make is such an understatement of what really happened.
Maybe it is because i grew up in Nebraska this book really takes me back to my roots. I experienced those HOT summers and the COLD winters and deep snow, the floods on the Elkhorn and Platte rivers. I know how desolate that prairie must have looked. I saw the prejudice and resentment toward the Indians as I grew up and could not understand it. Now I realize how recent that had been--just 2 or 3 generations back the whole way of life of the Indians had been destroyed and the pioneers had had to deal with the fear of savage Indian attacks. And now I know how much the railroad contributed.
I realize how much my perspective has changed during my lifetime as I read this book. And I like the title "Nothing Like It in the World." I had not really taken much of an interest in the railroads until now. I even have a cousin who is researching the land transfers in Nebraska and is going to publish a book this year--now I am more interested in his project. Ambrose is only briefly able to mention the land grants which were part of the financing deal.
Just some thoughts as I read. Marge
Ann Alden
April 14, 2001 - 04:16 am
When I read the posts, I feel as if I am walking around in history. Am I getting older? or what? Has anyone read the book, "Women Who Made the West"? Much history about those women in those wild towns. I have a copy but it is out on loan to my granddaughter who is taking forever to read it as she is in her last year in college.
FaithP
December 4, 2000 - 09:08 am
The best one on women who made the west was a collection of Diaries and Jounals written by women who came west, on the Oregan trail and other wagon trains too, and I can not remember the actual name of this book or Author either. I guess I could find out. Of course I have my great grandmothers story and she was a pioneer though she was 10 years after the railroads started as she made the trip from the east, Bathe Michigan with her babies etc. in 1876 in July.She settled in Purdy, California and also Beckworth CA on the NV state line.
When I started reading chapter 11 the first time it was exciting and I read fast and like I do an adventure story; almost as if I did not know how it all came out. Now I have been reading it in little chunks again to acquaint myself with it's content to say with the discussion. As I do I am reminded again and again of what The wonderful chinese workers did for the railroad. It is hard to imagine the English and Irish miners every doing this kind of back breaking tunneling and blasting for weeks on end going inches a day.
I remember my Seymour family talking about how the Chinese washed clothing and bathed everyday , this amazed the rest of the white crew who never washed except their faces. In the early 1900 one of my Seymour Uncles opened a laundry in Napa CA when he was very young and left the railroad job he had as a "wiper", and he always said it was the old Chinese man he met on the railroad who taught him the laundry business. Of course he saw how much money that man made too. FP
losalbern
April 15, 2001 - 06:32 pm
One of the key actitivites of this chapter was the determination of Ames to oust Durant from the leadership of the UP railroad. Ames wanted to build a quality railroad; Durant wwas interested in milking the government for construction costs and milestone payments in the cheapest way possible. I was surprised when the showdown between those two men resulted in two big changes: Ames was appointed as President of the UP Railroad, and secondly the Ames faction succeeded in ousting Durant from the Credit Mobilier organization. Both items appear to be huge steps in curing some of the management ills of the UP railroad.
Ann Alden
April 16, 2001 - 07:00 am
Faith, the book that I mentioned was put together by the organization, Women Writers of the West. Maybe that's the one you are talking about. Took my breath away to read of the guttsiness of those women.
FaithP
April 16, 2001 - 09:26 am
Well, also in this chapter No. Eleven the magnificent chore of getting a locamotive to the east side of the Sierra was accomplished."Now we are on the downgrade, and we Rejoice."Mark Hopkins wrote, and at the very end of the chapter I see, "It was a work that was to change the whole world. So Chapter eleven is an epiphany. Getting over the Summit is the thing that lightens the load and sets off the spirit of the great race to Utah.
The heading hasn't changed but I am in a hurry now that we are over the summit. We are bumping up against Chapter twelve Ginny. Where are you.
Ann, I may have read that collection also as I read a lot of western history and especially of the women pioneers. Faith
Ginny
April 17, 2001 - 03:45 am
So sorry, and you're so right, Chapter 11 going up in a second and isn't it exciting? Your comments, tho are better than the book, really, everybody adding so many good things to the discussion.
This is an unusual discussion in many ways. It's like a more leisurely train journey through the past and the American West but it's more than that.
I'm one of those people, so shoot me, who look for meaning in every small thing? And one thing in this book, well, here again in Chapter 12, we have mention again of Judah. I can't get over Theodore Judah and as Losalbern mentioned, the big clash now of Ames and Durant.
This has now become a race, have you pondered why? Why race? For the money or the power or what?
I found myself thinking about Losalbern's comment above, and the original Big Four who managed to oust Judah with nary a qualm. How is it we remember Judah at all? Because the records exist of his going to Congress?
I think that the underlying stories of this railroad and the implications for our own lives are staggering, myself. It's the first time I've felt this way, and I think there are some lessons here if I could only figure out what they ARE?
Here's a wonderful thing from Sunday's paper, did you see it? It seems that rail fans all over the country can now stay in hotels which allow them wonderful views of, in this case, the CSX Corp's switching yard and maintenance shops. And there's more, much more.
Train views for rail fans: excursions Or you can take the Western Maryland Scenic railroad:
It's the perfect way to describe the experience offered by the Western Maryland Scenic
Railroad!
Our restored early 20th century rolling stock steams through the mountains of Western
Maryland on a stunning 32 mile round trip between Cumberland and Frostburg from May
through December.
The trip covers a 1,300 foot change in elevation. You'll see tunnels and bridges and catch
glimpses of scenery hidden for decades. More than three hundred years of American history
are tied together by a ribbon of steel that thrills riders of all ages.
This web site is designed to invite you, your family and friends to come to Allegany County
and discover a quality vacation, beginning with Mountain Thunder. Here are some web site
highlights that may help you make your plans.
Steam Rail Excursions over hidden historic tracks The Sales Director of the hotel used to get requests for people on the quieter side, but when rail fans started asking how much more rooms would be facing the trains, she got the idea of pushing it and now there's an updated webcam photo (I can't find it yet) of the tracks. Trains magazine which has 115,000 readers, has created an international buzz among rail fans for the 65 rooms facing the tracks.
Don't you all want to go? I do? hahahahaa
Chapter 11 going UP!
ginny
Ginny
April 17, 2001 - 04:21 am
I know we're anxious to get on to the big race, (you almost feel you're there, don't you?) but I would like to pause a day or two to examine the extraordinary feats Chapter 11 mentions, in engineering for one thing and in snow conditions.
I've put a photo of the Summit Tunnel in the heading, a tunnel drilled from opposite sides, by using nitro, 7,042 feet above the sea level. YOu can see how it was gouged out in the photo, looks like by the scoopfull and yet when they met, they were only off 2 inches. How can that be possible? Don't you remember the Chunnel and how far it was off?
Now statistically the CP may seem to be a bit behind: they have laid not 20 miles of track continuously (p. 397) but the UP had bulit 500 miles of track, the CP was 370 miles behind its rival (p. 387). I think this would have been the point at which I started whining about "unfair! Mountains! Unfair!!"
What do you think drove them on to even consider some kind of race? Was it all financial? Or was it something else?
What was your opinion of the Chinese strike ("the Chinese wanted to eliminate the right of the overseeers of the company to either whip them or restrain them from leaving the road when they desire to seek other employment.")and its aftermath? (pp. 392-393). Do the demands of the Chinese workers seem excessive? What is your opinion of the outcome?
Strobridge refused to allow steam to be taken from the Sacramanto's boiler to run the drilling machine...."The truth is things have got to such a pass that there can't be a thing done unless it suits Strobridge." If this two hour prodedure which Strobridge said he did not have time for had been done, wouldn't that have speeded up things considerably? What is your opinion of Strobridge's decision quoted on page 384?? Wouldn't that have changed eveyrthing, to use steam drills? Why didn't Strobridge have two hours to spare to save many hundreds of hours?
There is a lot of fascinating stuff in this Chapter and if it suits everybody I'll put up Wyoming, Chapter 12, on Saturday morning.
ginny
Ann Alden
April 17, 2001 - 05:54 am
My book had to be returned to the library and I am waiting for another copy to be held for me. It has become very popular and I am on a short list of other readers.
Ginny, I saw that picture of the tunnel somewhere else. Was it in the California Museum site?
I clicked on the Summit Tunnel up above in the header and then found this page that is very interesting. Summit Tunnel
FaithP
April 17, 2001 - 10:57 am
Ann those pictures of the tunnels and Chinese Wall, Snow sheds and Donner Pass, are so wonderful. Where ever did you find that site. Thank you Thank you. To think I have been swimming in that lake, at the upper NE end of what you see in the picture, there is a public beach Tahoe National Forestry Service, and we loved to come on the school bus, down from Tahoe City which is higher up in the mountains than Donner, and swim there with the kids from the Truckee school. We could wander around and find the historic plaques of the Donner Parties Tradgedy. Oh I wish we had pictures of my family going over those roads in the late 20's and early 30's when I was a child and we made the trip several times a year over Donner Pass to go from the Sacramento Valley to Tahoe City. Back to the research...maybe I can find some pictures of that era. Faith
williewoody
April 18, 2001 - 11:37 am
PBS had an interesting program the other night(at least in the Hoston area) about the building of the Boulder Dam (originally called the Hoover Dam). It was built in the 1930's during the height of the great depression, and was the first of many dams later built in the west. It reminded me of the building of the transcontinental railroad in terms of the immensity of the project. It too was quite a hazardous project even though many labor saving devices were used. There were 112 men killed during the construction. At least the builders kept track of all those killed. I don't think we will ever know how many were killed by all means during the building of the railroad. Probably in the thousands.
losalbern
April 19, 2001 - 02:20 pm
This chapter 11 tells how the Big 4 decided to form their own version of Credit Mobilier that the UP used so successfully, and they called it the Credit and Finance Co. I have trouble understanding how this helped them right then because they were not able to get too much milestone money from the Government. They had such slow progress getting through the tough winters and the inch by inch progress in tunnel making that the money was not easy to come by. Nothing came easy for the CP railroad. I can see how their Contract and Finance Co. could make excessive profits if there were govt funds available but this would only become profitable once they worked on the downhill slopes to Nevada where laying rails would go much faster. Its a real wonder that CP managed to get through the Sierras without going flat broke. Folks, I have a computer problem that needs attention so I may be out of working order for a while. Got a funny noise that is'nt going to go away. Wish me luck! Bern
williewoody
April 19, 2001 - 04:14 pm
Good luck Bernie: Don't be away too long. I have to agree the CP had it tougher than the UP. The Big Four must have been very wealthy plus had the ability to get people to loan them money.
Looking down through Railroad History,the Central Pacific became the Southern Pacifc, which has now been swallowed up by the Union Pacific, which along with the Burlington Northern-SantaFe are the only two major railroads west of the Mississippi. There are two giants east of the Mississippi, the CSX and the Norfolk Southern, who have between them managed to swallow up all the other Railroads including Conrail.
My prediction is there will be only one freight railroad in the country eventually (and that may take another 50 years), and it will be Union Pacific. I won't be here as most of the rest of you, but the pattern is there. Only the government can stop it. But they haven't seem to be interested up to this point.
FaithP
April 19, 2001 - 05:33 pm
Willywoody I agree with you as to the governments disinterest in the rail system in this country. And it seems to me we really need federal intrest to pick up and see that the rail system is modernized and both passenger and freight railways are here to go into the modern world. They also need to come up more perfect fuel than diesel. I think it would be much better for the world. We are going to have to supplement air travel more as time goes by as air ways can not support much more traffic. It is getting more and more dangerous all the time re: Traffic controllers and their problems.
The Subject that Bernie brought up the creation of the Credit and Finance Co. by the big four and the manipulations they went through are what pushed the race. They the big four, had used all their own money and it was imperitive they get the highest payment possible from the government. That or they would go broke.
They were persistant men and real pioneers and gamblers too. And I have heard them called theifs too but don't exactly know why unless some though they corraled all the stock for thmeselves illigally. fp
Ann Alden
April 20, 2001 - 04:21 am
Faith, I used the clickable up in the header(Interesting Railroad
Links) and then clicked on certain things in that list. I believe
that you can find some old tunnel pictures on the California Museum
site. They have a whole collection of old pictures. Look at the Tunnel
clickable and then click on the CPRR Photgraphic History Museum. The
photos are wonderful!
CPRR PhotosThe
problem with these pics is no ID but somewhere in that folder there
are some Appleton photos just like these but identified at the bottom
in fine print. Here they are, at the bottom of this page: Tunnel Photos with
Descriptions
Ann Alden
April 20, 2001 - 05:38 am
Want to see and read some great stuff about the continental rr, look
at this page,about halfway down, with Ginny's locomotive gliding
across with the words Read About tagging along :
Great StuffThere is an
interesting article by a Robert Harris, titled, The Pacific
Railroad-Unopened. Atlantic Monthly--1869
FaithP
April 20, 2001 - 03:35 pm
Ann thanks for links. I have been to great stuff before and lost the link in my favorites. Well down the mountain side we go and the chinese labors are going to be glad I would think. It has been real hell getting over this summit and the pain of it all is not over yet. Back to my reading or I should say re reading. fp
losalbern
April 20, 2001 - 03:52 pm
That funny noise turned out to be my power supply fan so I just buttoned the case back up and am mulling over my next move. May wind up in the shop yet. Ann, and Ginny, I followed your clickables and even tho I had seen many of those pictures before, probably from your earlier clickables but I enjoy seeing them a second time. I believe that Faith mentioned earlier that most of those very necessary snowsheds have been torn down.What replaced them? Probably more powerful Diesels with snow plows. Those CP guys managed to do some interesting engineering to build some of the trestles over huge gullies. Like the one with the big curve in it.
Ann Alden
April 21, 2001 - 05:47 am
The reason that I mentioned the Robert Harris article is that its a first person visit to the construction sites while the workers prepared the road to the summit. He starts on the desert and ends up at the summit, under many covers to keep him warm. His description of looking down on the trees and river is well done. And, his complaint about not being able to appreciate all this scenery if you are riding the train is a precursor to our conservation of this country. Doesn't Muir arrive just few years later in California?
losalbern
April 22, 2001 - 04:23 pm
Ann, I read the remarkable Harris account. How about that 250 pound rock that was blasted into the air and traveled right over the Truckee hotel, some distance away. Wow! And I was also intrigued by the account by a Mr. Graves, I believe, that dealt with a "railroad war" between CP and a smaller California RR regarding which firm would take over and pull up the deserted rails of a small bankrupt local RR that went out of business. There was a confrontation with guns drawn. Those are great clickables and I intend to go back for more reading. Bern
Ginny
April 23, 2001 - 02:59 am
Thank you, Ann, for bringing those links to our attention, those links supplied often lead to hundreds of wonderful links and you could literally spend the rest of your life reveling in them.
Thank you all for everything you've brought here.
Here we are, now, on the final leg! It seems fitting, and almost as if we, too, have been out there working as when we do close this book on the final day we will have logged in ourselves 5 months of study of this book, this era and the events of the time.
I must say flatly that this book is one I would never have read and I'm so grateful to you all for making it interesting with your accumulated knowledge and your own family experiences and input. Thank you so much, we really ought to do something with what you all have offered here in the way of permanent collections, maybe when I get back from my trip we might look at that aspect of this discussion.
This morning I have put the finishing schedule in the heading, hope that is not too rushed. I've also put 8 startling points in this chapter and had to leave out about as many.
The first thing that struck me in this chapter is that Ambrose's prose is a letdown, this thing is hard wading to have so many electric points, did you think so also?
We can't take ONE point a day because we only have till Thursday night, so let's take two:
Let's start with the rivalry between Dodge and Durant. What is going on here? Both men are supposedly working together to build something but it seems one (Durant) wants the glory and will stop at nothing to attain it, even tho Dodge has the backing of Sherman and Grant?
What can we say about Durant and his ilk? What drives such people? Did Durant get his way? Which one had you heard about? These events are on pp 444-445.
I was absolutely shocked to find that the train used Pawnee indians to fight the other indians, I don't know why. That business about the musket loading rifles vs the Springfield rifles, breech loading, went right over my head. How could an indian on horseback load a musket type rifle and ride also and what difference does it make which end the gun loads from? The Springfield breechloader is on page 431.
What do you think, given the white man's opinion of the indian at that time, of using Pawnees to fight the Cheyenne, Sioux and Arapaho?
What happened to the Pawnees when the railroad was finished?
This chapter, to be so dully presented (or is it just me?) had no end of electric information, how did it strike you?
ginny
As you can see, rifles R not Us.
williewoody
April 23, 2001 - 08:46 am
Since we are headed for the finishing line I had better get in some of the interesting side notes I have gleaned from the other author I have been reading on the subject.
While not directly related to this subject, but at least a historic event involving railroads....
The first train robbery occured on October 6, 1866. No it wasn't Jesse James, but rather the Reno brothers who made history on that date when they robbed a Ohio and Missssippi Railroad train at Seymore, Indiana. After that successful venture which netted them $16,000 in gold, silver and paper money ( a tidy sum for those days) they continued to rob trains in nortwestern Missouri. In 1868 they tied to repeat ther earlier robbery of the O & M, but were foiled when the car was filled with armed guards who drove them off. Later the Pinkerton Agents tracked them down and left them dangling from trees along the railroad tracks. Speaking of the Pinkertons, their Agency was founded during the Civil War when they served as spies for the Union Army. As a side note, Nancy Pinkerton, a decendant of the original Pinkerton was a classmate of mine at DePauw Univ. in the 1940's.
losalbern
April 23, 2001 - 01:48 pm
It became quite evident of those who kept a careful eye on the progress of the Transcontinetal Railroad that both the Central Pacific and the Union Pacific executives were not above cutting a corner here and there. Both companies were crticized for " cheap, shoddy construction" and the entire railroad scheme was labled by some as "simply a speculation". The UP was described as the most powerful corporation in the world and probably the most corrupt. I suspect that most of the criticisim was the result of that period where Durant was running the UP before Ames took over. Ames and Dodge seem to see eye to eye when it cam to good construction vrs the Durant quick and dirty methods. It took General Sherman's interference to force Durant and his sidekick Seymour to back down and do things Dodge's way. As an aside here, the city of Omaha saw fit in it earliest days to name its major east\west thoroughfare Dodge Street as it still is to this day. Similarly, another one of Omaha's main streets is Ames Avenue. I know of no street name after Durant.
Ann Alden
April 23, 2001 - 04:14 pm
Willie, I didn't know you were a Hoosier. Me,too!
Ginny, that schedule seems fine to me. I am operating without the book but certainly have much to read in the clickables.
williewoody
April 23, 2001 - 04:22 pm
ANN: First of all I am not a hoosier. Was born and raised in Chicago, but went to college in Indiana.
Good show Loselbern. I believe Durant was strictly a gambler who was looking for a fast buck. I spent a week in Omaha when I was young and dont remember what the streets were named.
Ann Alden
April 23, 2001 - 04:31 pm
Willie, I didn't know you were a Hoosier. Me,too!
Ginny, that schedule seems fine to me. I am operating without the book but certainly have much to read in the clickables.
williewoody
April 23, 2001 - 05:30 pm
In answer to your last question I would give almost anything to have a share of anything that would increase in value 280% in one year.
The answer to the question of why the two RR's ran parallel in Utah was because nobody seemed to be able to put the brakes on. Congress had ruled that the lines would meet at the Prominitory summit, but they were both so money hungry they kept on building as long as the government paid.
Please!, let's not bring Bill Clinton into this discussion. Enough said!!!!!
If my life was in danger, a breech loading rifle would save it as opposed to a muzzle loader. Again enough said. Agreed fellows?
FaithP
April 23, 2001 - 06:12 pm
nuff said. Fp
Ginny
April 24, 2001 - 09:41 am
Waaaitttt just a minute there, Faith, Williewoody and Fellows! hahahaha
Help this poor country girl out here. Loading is loading, right? Front, rear, side, what's the diff? hahahaaha
I do appreciate everybody in here so much!
I have replaced the Dale Creek bridge this morning with ol Doc Durant himself. As many of you know, SN is moving to a new server and apparently they copied off the images gallery before 2 am Pacific time so the Dale Creek bridge has to wait but Doc himself is a very good example and I thought Losalbern had a fabulous point: there is no street called Durant Street.
Remember Gunsmoke? Dodge City? hashahaha Just occurred to me.
Durant said to Dodge that he "had no desire to interfere with the work or delay it, but only wanted to help." OH oh oh, these people who
only want to "help." Most of the time the person they want to help is themselves.
In front of General Ulysses S Grant and Generals Sherman and Sheridan, Durant made his move!
He took them to the end of the track and "took great pains on this trip to post them thoroughly about everything connected with the UP."
Durant at the end of the trip, was "bold enough to take the floor..." he attacked Dodge (p. 443) ...telling Grant that and the others that Dodge had selected extravagant routes, wasted precious time and money on useless surveys, ignored the sound judgment of Silas Seymour...had neglected his congressional duties, and more."
Grant turned to Dodge. "What will you do about it?" he asked.
"Just this," Dodge answered. "If Durant, or anybody connected with the UP, or anybody connected with the government, changes my lines, I'll quit the road."
What a man! I just love that kind of strength, my own husband is very much like that, you have to fight fire with fire. I loved that.
Way to go, DODGE!!!! Ol Doc was way out of his league there, military men usually pull together, I can't remember if Durant was a military man or not, do you all?
Ann I'll try to put in as much info as I can about what's happening to help you remember here.
Williwoody, thank you for the first train robbery info, I did think it would have been Jesse James, but no! I did read an account of James's first train robbery and it was a horror, he was no Robin Hood.
Willie, I'm also with you on the 280 percent increase, Home Depot, pay attention here!!
Thank you for that insight on why they kept building beyond Promontory Point, that's almost beyond belief to me, two adjoining tracks going in opposite directions!!!!!!!!!!
Unbelievable! I can't wait to see what stops it!
Losalbern, I'm often confused here (I think there is either a lot or repetition in the book, I KNOW I have seen that stuff about the supply cars being overturned before, but maybe it was on the other line) but I'm confused here about which line cut the most corners? We know that Durant slapped it down but what of the CP?
Is there any attempt made to characterize one or the other of the lines as MORE careless or sloppy?
I know we had the washes on the CP line and then the UP had the cottonwoods, do any of you get the feeling that one line was more derelict than the other?
ginny
losalbern
April 24, 2001 - 12:16 pm
Ginnie, I will try to answer your query about "cutting corners". It seems to me that both railroads employed bit of larceny in their dealings with the government, et al. For example, early in the game, the CP figured that it would be to their financial advantage to be paid twice the amount of payment allowed for laying rails on flat or hilly grounds than was paid for laying track in the moutainous regions above Sacramento. So what the Big Four concocted was a plan to tell the govt, via some sort of affadavit, that the mountainous region began several miles further west of where the Sierras foothills actually began, therefore qualified for the $32,000 per mile of track as opposed to the $16,000 per mile of track payable for track laid in lesser difficult terrain. You may remember that Judah flatly refused to sign this document because, in his mind, it was fraudulent and that was the final blow between Judah and the Big Four. From that point on each faction tried to get rid of the other. So although one might think that the CP skirts were cleaner than the day to day operation employed by Durant and the UP people, both railroads would cut a corner when they deemed it necessary. Apparently there was inadequate government oversite of how those government furnished funds were spent.
losalbern
April 24, 2001 - 12:33 pm
My experience with rifles is pretty much limited to the Gerand model I lugged around during WWll. But seems like I do recall that the muzzle loading process took much longer to accomplish than did the newer breech models. I believe the breech models had rifled barrels for the first time which made the bullet fly truer and with more accuracy. The next improvement, seems to me, was that someone came up with the idea of combining the bullet, the gunpowder, and the percussion cap all in one cartridge which greatly improved the speed in which the rifle could ne reloaded. When you have an Indian Brave bearing down on you while you are reloading your weapon, a couple of extra seconds fewer to get the job done might be really appreciated.
williewoody
April 24, 2001 - 02:40 pm
Right you are Bernie, which is why I previously said if it was a matter of life or death, I would much rather have a breech loader than a muzzle loader rifle. Time is of the essence!!!!!
Ginny
April 25, 2001 - 02:09 am
Losalbern, thank you so much for those two explanations, neither side was clean, no government overseeing went on, tho it's clear the government supported at least the UP. That makes Dodge's comment above short sighted, doesn't it? If the government had stepped in, he would have won the day and he wouldn't have had to threaten to quit. Unless, of course, Durant's accusations were right.
Two more days left in this chapter, I feel we are picking up steam ourselves and roaring toward the finish line.
I had to drive three stakes the other day for a tripod sprinkler and it seems this book has got hold of me, all I could think of was the railroad and how I would have been fired on the spot. hahaaha
Also many thanks for the cartridge explanation, that makes sense. I've seen demonstrations of those old muzzle loaders and it does seem to take a good bit of time, wadding, powder, etc., and as williewoody says, precious minutes....and certainly impossible to do or difficult to do on horseback.
Using the Pawnee as a fighter against the others seems a novel idea to me, I'm still wondering what happened when the railroad was finished to the Pawnee, it's not as if the indian as a whole was cherished.
Interestingly enough the Wall Street Journal last weekend did a big feature on the new "gentleman farmer" of the west, who moves west, creates "Dude Ranches" with all the trimmings and tries to recreate the old west. When we hear of them starting their old railroads we can go along as crew! hahahaha
I just can't conceive of the two railroads laying tracks in view of each other but not meeting the other, wouldn't that make a movie, tho?
The whole thing would make a good movie. And what about all the deaths? That's quite a roster, it seems to me, of people lost in this chapter??
And we also see Huntington blatantly lying about the end of the tracks. Has there been any enterprise any where at any time in history which was done idealistically?
ginny
Ann Alden
April 25, 2001 - 12:29 pm
Strangers passing in the night! Hahaha! I can't believe that this happened! What a hoot!
Thanks, Ginny, for keeping me abreast of the book. Side by Side! This is a new part of history for me. I went looking for a listing of train wrecks and unexpectedly came across a listing of train expressions and their explanations. Here 'tis: Railroad Lingo
FaithP
April 25, 2001 - 03:52 pm
I have been out in Nevada and Utah when the grasshoppers were so bad you had to quite driving because of the skidding, and not being able to see through the windshield.I fortunatly was not there long enough to begin to smell putrid ones. I can see the poor cows and chickens trying to find cover and get away from those hordes of grasshoppers. Of course there are lots of stories about the mormon settlers, grasshoppers and seagulls. But those grasshoppers have come to Nevada and Utah long before there were mormons I am sure.
I have also bathed in the Great Salt Lake and it was not very refreshing in 1942 when I did it it was hot and salty beyond any ocean almost a brine and smelled awful with out any grasshoppers. fp
FaithP
April 25, 2001 - 03:53 pm
Ginny's book must be a very different edition or else the page no. are wrong in the heading. x it out.fp
losalbern
April 26, 2001 - 02:31 pm
Engineer Ginnie says, "I feel we are picking up steam--" How topical! And she has been driving stakes into the ground too! Ginnie were you humming "I have been working on the railroad?" God love ya, Ginnie you certainly get into the spirit of this discussion. You really are a fun leader and a joy to read. New Subject: DUDE RANCHES.. Years ago, it occurred to me that some Indian tribe might consider developing a summer camp dude ranch for young kids who might want to spend a few weeks living in a Teepee, learning Indian lore, riding an Indian pony, practicing with a bow and arrow, learning how to read animal tracks and listening to Indian stories told around the night's campfire. I think kids would eat that up ! I know that my elsest son loved the Indian Guides that we participated in. His Mom made our tribe a 10 foot tall muslin teepee that was a knockout after we finished decorating it. Those eight year olds were enthralled.
losalbern
April 26, 2001 - 03:44 pm
Ann, that clickable is certainly interesting! Did you get as far of the definition of a "deadbeat?" First I heard of that one. But I am puzzled about something. In that same posting, you mentioned something about "ships that pass in the night" being a hoot? What did I miss out on? Bern
Ginny
April 27, 2001 - 09:20 am
Faith, you are so right and I am so sorry, I'm using the large print edition, I did not order it but it came that way so have used it since, thanks for the head's up am using the Chapters in the heading now.
Losalbern, thank you for those kind thoughts,
you all here are the engines behind my train, I've really enojoyed this experience and think I have learned a lot. And I do totally agree with you on the Dude Ranch Indian experience and think somebody needs to come up with that asap, my boys loved sleeping in tents!
To be so stunningly dull reading (sorry) these two chapters contain much wonderful and startling information, what is your further take on any or all of these things??
GRASSHOPPERS!! Have you ever seen such a thing? Makes you appreciate Moses and the plagues, doesn't it? We have had cyclical appearances of grasshoppers here in the past, the last with small green grasshoppers about 3 years ago, and I'm telling you right now, those buzzards can BITE! Even riding a golf cart thru them they fly up on you and bite the FIRE out of you, I can't IMAGINE being caught in that sort of thing, and just think: they stopped the TRAIN!!!
The Great Salt Lake: Faith, I have never been to the Great Salt Lake could you expound a bit on what it's like? Apparently it pickled the grassphoppers, I am anxious to learn more about it, do you float in it as they say? Can't sink?
And at long last here in the upper 400 plus pages, we finally learn how those cars galloping to the end of the line are treated, they are simply LIFTED off the tracks (wouldn't you kill to know how they did that?) and the new ones rush up. Maybe Ambrose wanted us to be in suspense, hahaha. I sure was.
The modern rail lines (I found my schedule again) run right thru that Winnemucca, not to mention Salt Lake City. As well wasn't it interesting to learn how Reno got its name?
But the stunner here for me was the quote in the heading and first discussion topic, the real reason why the lines continued their own course in sight of the other: it's MY road.
"Then if I have the right of way secured, I shall assert our line to be the only one of the Pacific RR and that others must keep off our right of way." (Stanford to Crocker) (Chapter 14...end)
Remember the old Monopoly game? He who owned the RR owned the world. It's MY road and you get to pay ME for it. Aren't you dying to know what stopped that or who stopped that? Wow, this IS getting exciting!
Oh and so much more in these chapters, and Losalbern, you are totally right, I got up this morning singing I've been working on the railroad, wondering who Dinah was and what horn she was blowing, if any of you have the time to research that song or lyrics I would like to know.
I'm leaving at 3 today for Savannah but will return bright eyed on Monday morning to see what you all think were the important elements of these chapters, what about Brigham Young? I never knew that much about him, this is fascinating.
ginny
williewoody
April 27, 2001 - 11:27 am
For the benefit of anyone who may be interested in seeing a restored and operating steam locomotive, the May issue of TRAINS Magazine has an excelent presentation of all of the major large steamers,and where and when they can be seen this year. They will all be in action in virtually every sector of the country. In some cases excursions will be available/. There is also a separate section entitled Guide to Recreational Railroading. which lists all the tourist trains, and museums in every state.
williewoody
April 28, 2001 - 07:09 am
Ginny: answering your query about the lyrics to "Working on the Railroad" Dinah was the cook (Prorbably black) for a track work crew. When she had the meal ready she blew on a trumpet like horn to call the workers in for the meal. Sounds like she had a gentleman friend who hung around the kitchen and played a banjo.
Ann Alden
April 28, 2001 - 09:29 am
Hey, Lasel, just a reference to the trains being on different tracks, each going his own way and right in sight of each other.
Isn't the word, "deadhead" still used to describe a non-paying passenger or employee who is riding free? Seems like that is what they call them on the airlines, the buses and the trains.
FaithP
April 28, 2001 - 04:44 pm
Well, 0n pg 304 in my book there is a pararaph about the boundary for Reno.Author States " Crocker pulled the name out of a hat." I don't think so. I am going to research that because this was in 1868 and I believe at that time there was a town named Reno Springs where Moana Springs and Hotbaths are now. And it is just about 15 miles down the old hw 40 from hot springs to the center of what is now Reno. Between this (reno)area and Carson City was a town named Wadsworth which became Sparks in 1895 when it incorporated, and Sparks of course is the large switching yards and Round House on the east side of the summit and Roseville on the west side. fp
losalbern
April 28, 2001 - 06:07 pm
Ann, that clickable that you had furnished us had a glossary of railway terms that was so interesting. One that caught my eye was their definition of "deadbeat." Apparently a railcar that is filled with goods makes a sound when passing over the rail joints that is different from an empty car. Since empty cars don't earn money for the railraod, that empty car sound is considered to have a "deadbeat" compared to the the full car sound. And that is how the term "deadbeat" was introduced into common useage. How about that!
losalbern
April 29, 2001 - 02:26 pm
Ginny, I have to agree with you Chapter 13 was very dull reading. I had a heck of a time trying to find the areas being worked on by flopping back and forth to those little maps that were scattered around the book. One thing was for certain: I had no idea that Brigham Young played such a prominent role the final work done for both the UP and CP railroads in Utah. A lot of that work was paid for out of his own pocket mainly because Durant kept stalling on the payments owed him. Another eye opener for me was the amount of effort that the CP had to put out for building those huge snow sheds. It must have been stifling for the crews and passengers breathing all that junk coming out of the smokestacks, especially in the 29 mile shed. And also,look how long it took for CP to finish off that last 7 miles of summit track so that now they had a continuous track out of Sacramento to Truckee.
Ginny
April 30, 2001 - 02:00 pm
OH Loasalbern, you are SOOO right, 29 miles of stifling smoke, not to mention the possibility of fire and being roasted alive, a bit more excitement than I would like.
And I do agree with you on the exciement factor in these two chapters, very very slow, in spite of all the fascinating material presented and I have to wonder why?
What IS your opinion of the way Ambrose chose to present material in this book: the alternating of the lines chapter by chapter and did he, in the end, pull it off successfully or not?
Is there anything you think might have been left off that he included?
Faith, my book mentions in Chapter 14 in the paragraph starting "To the east, out where the desert met the foothills..." the hat business and that it was named for Jesse Lee Reno, A Civil War general and hero killed at the Battle of South Mountain in September 1862.
Wonder who else's name was in the hat? I know Durant's wasn't he was on the other line. I bet Judah's wasn't either.
And you say that's page 304? Well that's page 495 in my book so let's try a little test, if you will.
It appears that my book runs about 191 pages in advance probably exponentially so if I say on page 478 that this sentence occurs in the paragraph about "For engineer James Maxwell...:" Next his train was stopped by grasshoppers..." Can we assume that's on your page 277 or thereabouts?
Heck of a time to find this out. ahahahah
Ann, loved that deadbeat thing, enjoyed Losalbern's explanation also, I love to hear of the origins of words. A car bearing the license plate LEADHEAD passed us on the trip, what do you think that referred to? I had no clue.
Willie, WOW! I need that magazine, is it sold in stores as well? Now I would kill to see one of those old engines. I am on the phone with the local Barnes & Noble and when I asked about a magazine called Trains the response was, "What would that be about?" er...uh it might be about trains. My horroscope says this week I need to hibernate and I believe I will heed it. hahaaha
Sigh.
Ann Alden
April 30, 2001 - 02:02 pm
Sorry, Lasel. I read the wrong description of the wrong word. I see what you were talking about. When I lived along the Monon railroad in Indianapolis, as a mere child, I noticed that the empty cars were easy to identify even with their doors shut or if you were out of eyesight from them as they had a loose, hollow sound compared to the full cars which made a solid heavy sound.
Ginny
April 30, 2001 - 02:06 pm
I can't remember, did I ever post the current steam engines in use in Africa? It's stunning to see.
Thank you Williewoody, for the information about the explanation of Dinah, I thought the "horn" was some sort of Steam whistle.
I almost bought you all something! In the gift shop of the hotel on my trip was a silk tie and it was full of the slogans and signs including the last plate in the Ambrose book, all in color on a yellow silk background, all about trains and steam and I thought maybe we should auction it off or something but then was not sure that any of you would want it, but it was startling to see that last illustration in glowing color (very pretty) on a tie!
ginny
williewoody
April 30, 2001 - 04:14 pm
GINNY, ANN, ET.AL. Ginny I almost busted a gut when you related your experience with the Barnes and Noble clerk. That is unbelieveable, how someone could ask such a question. Yes, I am sure they would have TRAINS on their magazine rack. as does Walden Books and probably most convenience stores. I believe you are in the southeast, so that unfortunately there are no big steamers in action down your way. The closest would be Columbus Ohio, or St. Louis, Missouri. There are many locations where smaller steam locomotives are used on tourist trains. Too bad you can,t see the UP's big mother, the #3985. I have ridden trains pulled by it and have met the engineer, Steve Lee. But being Union Pacifc, they only operate west of the Mississippi.
ANN: your mention of the Monon(My favorite Railroad) stirred up fond memories of when I rode on it from Chicago to Greencastle, Indiana during my college years. I worked for the Monon about two weeks while waiting a call to active duty in the Marines in 1943. I'll never forget after graduation, I couldn't get a regular job anywhere because of my military status, so I applied for a job loading freight cars on the Monon. A position normally held by winos and bums. The foreman asked me to sign the applicaton with my X. I asked him if it was OK if I signed my name since I had just graduated from college.
seldom958
April 30, 2001 - 05:19 pm
Wife & I have a memory of it.
In June of 1961 we drove from NY to CA with 4 kids in a VW bus to visit family, stopping at points of interest along the way.
In Utah, we got into swim suits and entered the Great Salt Lake. In about two or three minutes our nine year old daughter yelled to her 10 year old sister; "hey Terry, does the water make your buhgina burn?" Nearby adults howled.
Yes, you can float, and at various times even while in a sitting posistion. At that time they had fresh water showers so one could wash off the caked salt. We still smile over it.
FaithP
April 30, 2001 - 07:50 pm
Seldom had they torn down the Fun House and the RollerCoaster on the board walk by then? When we were out there in the 40's and early 50's those were still there but I think by our last trip with kids in middle 50's they were closed and maybe then torn down. Yes we swam or I should say we splashed around and I didn't find that you could really float any easier than in any water but my husband insisted that he could. I had the "burn" your nine year old yelled about and I wanted a shower very quickly after splashing around a little.
I found all this book interesting and yes at times it is slow reading almost as a text book is. But I never lost interest nor patience as I have live in and around all the Places in the book. I traveled from Tahoe to Reno to get born in 1927 over the old highway then at least once a year for the rest of my life up to mid 20's I was over the summit from Sac to Truckee then to Tahoe or down to Reno. Las t time I drove it alone was 1992 and the new highway 880 had me in Truckee in one hour and 30 minutes. Most of that time it seemed was getting on the freeway from my house etc. That same trip from Sac to Truckee in 1927 over old hwy 40 a lot of it still gravel at the top of the summit, took my family about six h ours and lots of turning the car around and backing up to make the grade. Train trip from Sac to Reno was an overnighter even in the 40's, approx. 7 hours. as I remember.We thought nothing of it in the old days. That was just how long it took. When my parents stayed in the Bay area some winters it was a dawn to late dusk trip about 10 or more hours to Tahoe even in 1940.
I lived in Reno after I was married, all my maternal cousins lived in in Sparks(Wadsworth) and I visited there very often. And then my mom and sis and I all love Nevada so much we made lots of trips out there. My mother of course was raised mostly in Nevada.
Anyway I still slip in and sip at a page here and a page there when you people refer to something. I only knew the slang for Deadhead which is what the single engine with no train hooked up to it did returning home ..and I guess the empty boxcars could be deadheaded too. Fp
seldom958
April 30, 2001 - 08:34 pm
Don't recall a Fun House and Roller Coaster at the Great Salt Lake in 1961. If it were there then I'm certain our 4 kids would've wanted to spend a little time there.
Born and raised in Vallejo, CA our family camped in South Lake Tahoe in the 30s. It took us 7 to 8 hrs for the trip; now an hr to 2 hrs. Recall one time watching an Indian family,a woman and 3 or 4 children, eat a meal while sitting on the ground and dipping into a basket for food with their hands. Now the thought of interfering like this embarrasses me.
Well there is hope that eventually we do learn.
Ann Alden
May 1, 2001 - 07:35 am
Willie, the Monon ran right past my backyard and the suburban station was just down the street. Hahaha! Your X, huh! Glad the Monon gave you rides to college. My brother took some accounting classes there when he lived in Greencastle while a station agent for Pennsylvania RR. Where would I look for a steam engine here in Columbus,Ohio? I know that the Hocking Valley RR has one and have taken a ride on that tourist train but don't know of one here in Columbus.
Ginny
May 1, 2001 - 08:23 am
Willie I can't find the magazine anywhere, do you happen to have a phone number connected with it I could call? I loved your story about the guy asking for the X, will never forget a Pharmacist when I was still teaching English in the public schools, spelling in a condescending way, a very simple word for me, I did the same thing you did, thanked him for his concern since I would not have known how to spell it. I wonder sometimes if the vaunted crankiness of old age has more to do with having to have fielded so many of the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune hahahaha.
I've got a fabulous set of photos of current operating steam engines all over the world that USE them for modern transport....stay tuned!
ginny
Ginny
May 1, 2001 - 08:24 am
Ann thank you, I forgot to say, for that link on railroad lingo and have put it in our HTML page of insteresting links supplied by our readers, (it's third from the bottom)...it was fascinating.
And I've really enjoyed your stories of the Great Salt Lake, Seldom and Faith, how fascinating. Thank you for that. So it burns so a grasshopper would be....would it be pickled? Are there bones etc, if not fun houses around the site?
Faith I loved this:
That same trip from Sac to Truckee in 1927 over old hwy 40 a lot of it still gravel at the top of the summit, took my family about six h ours and lots of turning the car around and backing up to make the grade. Train trip from Sac to Reno was an overnighter even in the 40's, approx. 7 hours. as I remember.We thought nothing of it in the old days. That was just how long it took.
How marvelous. I, too , have encountered those gravel roads still recently in the high elevations of....was it Nevada or Utah, and we did the scarey turn around and we met a car coming down once driving up to a "ghost town" which AAA said was interesting, a one way road of dirt and gravel with a sheer drop on the right and solid rock on the left and met a car? Let me tell you, the old hands clamped on the wheel would NOT release at the famous ghost town and so we took the long long long (NOT recommended ) way back.
But I loved the way you put that, "We thought nothing of it in the old days. That was just how long it took." Very profound thought here, we're not so removed from those "old days," either, are we? My mother could remember going out in a buggy with her father, a country doctor, in those Old Days, to treat his patients in the mountains. Sounds a bit quaint now in these days of the now defunct Concorde, but haven't they some new plane who can do the same?
Remember in the book where they said old men could eat an apple or something in California and be in New York the next week was it? And we think nothing of being in California in the morning and New York in the afternoon. Maybe someday they'll be in LA at 9 and NYC at 10 and back home at 2, just like the supposed jet set does with dinner in Paris.
You all were a part of history, it's hard to realize that. Even to me, a person who has not lived in those areas of the country, it's interesting, but not as if it meant something personally to me.
I almost feel through this book we've been a part of it, ourselves!
ginny
williewoody
May 1, 2001 - 12:00 pm
GINNY: Don't you have any hobby shops around you anywhere? If they sell model trains they most certainly would also have TRAINS magazine. The Publisher is Kalmbach Publishing of Waukesha, Wisconsin Ph: 262-796-8776.
ANN: Once again TRAINS magazine has a write up about where large steamers will be operating this summer. In your area (Columbus) the Ohio Central Railroad Co. is supposed to operate an excursion sometime this summer out of Columbus to Massillon. TRAINS did not have the dates. This is a recently restored 4-8-4 ex Grand Trunk Western locomotive #6325. Check with Ohio Central's office in Columbus. The owner of that small RR.According to Trains Mag. is real Gung Ho about operating a big steam Locomotive. Mentions possible trip to Detroit??
losalbern
May 1, 2001 - 12:32 pm
Ann, While reading your posting about living near a railroad as a child, something popped into my head that I have not thought of in many, many years. There were times when Dad drove his beloved Graham Paige around Omaha that it became necessary to wait at a crossing for a long train of railroad cars to pass by. On one such occasion my older sister turned to me, her four year old brother, and said, "I saw U.P. on a boxcar!" Being non-reader at that time, I was humiliated at her statement and proceeded with loud and vigorous protestations, until my Mom sternly interjected that it was all a very bad joke. Isn't it amazing what the human mind can recall? Willie, Boy, you were fortunate to get your degree before entering the Corps. Did you find that it was helpful in your Service experience? Also, can you point out a place in California where I could visit a Steam Engine exhibit this summer? Ginny, I checked my book and my highest numbered page is 431 and that is at the end of the index. You must have the deluxe version or perhaps the edition with large print? I don't have a problem with Ambrose alternating chapters between CP and UP but once in a while I get confused within a chapter when he bounces around in different time frames. All in all, I think he tells the story ok.
Ginny
May 1, 2001 - 03:18 pm
Loalbern! hahahahaah THAT Is the story of the year of all the great stories we've heard here, THAT one takes the cake! hahahaahaha
YOU, Sir, are a HOOT!
Williewoody, thank you for that hint and that phone number, I shall call one or the other tomorrow, this is so fun!
Oh my hahahahahaha
Made my day.
ginny
FaithP
May 1, 2001 - 06:37 pm
There is a wonderful Railroad museum in Sacramento with different kinds of Locomotives. I do not know if they have a particular Summer exhibit for Steam Engines but If you go to their web site I am sure you can e mail for a brochure. I just put in a search in Google for Sacramento RR Museum and got several pages to refer to for different stuff. You can do the search and choose the right reference for yourself. Faith
Ann Alden
May 2, 2001 - 07:00 am
Williewoodie,
Thanks for the info on the Ohio Central Railroad. My husband and I will be looking into that ride from here to Massilon and maybe Detroit.
Ginny,
Did you post or put in the header the trains of Africa? Sounds intriguing!
Who of the posters, way back in the beginning of this discussion, mentioned having traveled on a train through Colorado or was it Nevada? Anyway, I would like to know where to look on the net for info on those kinds of trips. Anyone????
Ginny
May 2, 2001 - 07:58 am
Ann, I was one of those who went West on the train and here's the
Amtrak Home Page where you can get information. They have divided, as you probably know, the country into thirds, so that people can have these unlimited travel tickets by sections?
But they do go cross country and here's proof, here's a bad image of some of their routes. I intend fully to take the train west from Chicago for our 2002 Books Gathering and maybe the upper one, the Empire Builder, back from Seattle, as it covers areas I have not seen. Here's the map:
Map of all Amtrak Routes in the US Good! I was hoping I had not put up the African and other operating steam trains and will do so tonight, have to go off for a bit.
ginny
williewoody
May 2, 2001 - 01:44 pm
BERNIE: You are in luck. This coming weekend May 5 and 6. The San Bernardino Railroad Historical Society which owns the Santa Fe restored 4-8-4 #3751 will have it under steam in Fullerton, Ca. Check website www.sbrhs.com for more details. I last saw it at the NRHS convention in Sacramento in 1999.
losalbern
May 2, 2001 - 02:56 pm
I just checked with my Social Secretary (June) and we have a clear agenda Saturday, May 5th, so that we are planning to go see that big 4-8-4 Steam Engine. Thanks for the tip Bill. Bernie
Ann Alden
May 3, 2001 - 04:20 am
Thanks, Ginny, for the Amtrak info. Also, the pictures of the locomotives used in other countries make me wonder if they are using antiques or is that their level of expertise? The one used in Zimbabwe looks like something that a amatuer would build. China's seems okay and I have seen India's often when the different PBS stations take the public on a train expedition.
By the by, I found the Ohio Central Railroad's net site with a full schedule presented. See: Ohio Central RR
Ginny
May 3, 2001 - 04:24 am
I've put three photos in the heading, hope it doesn't make it too slow to load, about countries where steam is still used today?
These are from a section entitled Still in Steam from Eyewitness Books: Train.
It notes that
Steam locomotives still operate regular passenger and freight services in parts of Asia....then it goes on to talk about revivals of interest all over the world where enthusiasts have brought back the steam excursion.
That truly magnificent photo of Zimbabwe's Steam Revival had to be lightened, but in the original it's a symphony of purples and blacks and belching steam, just a wonder to behold.
The text says:
In the late 1970's Zimbzbwe Railways refurbished a number of their British built Beyer-Garratt steam locomotives. This was due to the plentiful supply of Zimbabwe coal, and the desire to be independent of expensive imported oil used to fuel diesel locomotives. For this reason , Zimbabwe has attracted railroad enthusiasts from all over the world, to see and photograph some of the most powerful working steam locomotives in existence.
Of the second photo, of China, the book notes:
The building of new steam locomotives in China only ceased tat the end of the 1980's. Railroads form the backbone of public transportation in China, where steam locomotives are still used routinely. At the beginning of 1990 !! there were some 7,000 steam locomotives compared with 4,700 diesel and 1,200 electric.
And finally of India and Pakistan, the last photo:
Relatively few lines in India and Pakistan are run especially with tourists in mind. But the wide range of steam trains still operating there, such as this 70 year old British built tank locomotive, attract many enthusiasts from all over the world.
Losalbern, I want PHOTOS! Do you have a digital camera?? Photos for our heading here of Losalbern and his Social Secretary and Steam!!!
I finished Chapters 15 and 16 last night and will get them up in the morning, now we find out what stopped the competition and what you can see on I-80. We will have to get off and drive I-80 as we go out west!
ginny
Ann Alden
May 3, 2001 - 04:34 am
Do look at the pictures of the steam engines being used on the Ohio Central. In particular, look at the one of the engine being transported by a semi-truck. Here:
Truck gives train a ride! That site is really an education. I am hoping to get up to Sugarcreek to take a ride before the tourists arrive for the Amish country summer influx. It can be really bad, traffic wise. Two lane roads just teeming with tourists in their cars and on buses. The best time to go is during the week but even then the buses are there.
Ginny, we are posting on top of each other! LOL!
Ginny
May 3, 2001 - 04:39 am
Ann we were posting together, I've added more information on all of the trains, thanks so much for that link.
Actually that Zimbabwe one is a famous version of some we have already talked about: the articulated locomotive.
The Beyer-Garratt was a much more powerful articulated locomotive later used in Africa as well as in India, Australia and Britain.
I THINK but am open to correction here, that what you see in front is actually the power unit and the engine itself is behind, note the position of the smoke.
Eyewitness books mentions this, as well, about another engine shown here with its power unit:
Articulated Engine with power unit The book says of this strange looking arrangement:
This locomotive was built in Britain in 1909 for use in Tasmania. It was the first of a new type of articulated (composed of segments) locomotive, designed for use on lines with sharp curves. Powerful locomotives of thie type were made up of two steam power units pivoted at either end of the main frame, which carries the boiler and cab.
I am interested in learning more about this Beyer-Garratt, if any of you have any more info on it?
ginny
Ginny
May 3, 2001 - 04:43 am
Boy that Amish thing looks wonderful, doesn't it, Ann, and it just begins May 5, 2001, we're on the cutting edge here!
Thanks so much for that link!
ginny
Ann Alden
May 3, 2001 - 05:27 am
Ginny
Here's a site about Beyer-Garratt locomotives built for Tasmania. Beyer-Garrett
Here's a brief bit about the Australian connection:
Technology in Australia 1788-1988
The Garratt Locomotive
In a quest for more power - usually pulling power or tractive effort rather than
horsepower - from a single locomotive over indifferent track, overseas railway engineers
had by 1900 already developed a variety of articulated multi 'engine' locomotives drawing
steam from one boiler. The British Fairlie, continental Meyer, and continental/U.S.
Mallet were the most common. In 1907 Herbert Garratt, the N.S.W. Railways'
Inspecting Engineer in London, proposed a new form of 3 piece articulated locomotive.
It had a central frame, a conventional boiler and a single cab slung between two end
'engine' units, each with one set of cylinders, wheels and motion; both engine units had
water tanks and that adjoining the cab, a fuel bunker as well.
Garratt was an Australian and it would be nice to claim that he fully recognised the major
breakthrough in steam locomotive technology that his arrangement permitted, but it
seems that he did not. The big advantage of the Garratt is that it permits use of a
boiler dimensioned up to the full cross section of the loading gauge, with a firebox and
grate unconstrained by wheels. The engine units were fully able to exploit this boiler with
the locomotive weight spread over a long, flexible, multi axle wheel base. This made
possible a powerful, high tractive effort, good riding locomotive eminently suitable for
Australia's light track and weak bridges, but these features were not exploited in
Garratt's first engine. It was a very small narrow gauge engine on two 2 axle bogies, with
its cylinders inboard and arrange for compound expansion according to the prevailing
fashion of the time. It was built for the 600 mm gauge Dundas Tramway in N.E.
Tasmania in 1909 and, after long service and several changes of hands, is preserved in the
Railway Museum at York, England.[7]
The Garratt concept was taken up, developed and aggressively marketed not by Australia,
but by Beyer Peacock, the famous British locomotive building firm. Early Australian
applications were in Tasmania (including 8-cylinder double Atlantic (4-4-2+2-4-4) express
engines) and in W.A. both on 1067 mm gauge and before the First World War, and later in
Victoria, Queensland, S.A. and finally N.S.W. The concept was sold to railways on every
continent except North America and reached its fullest potential in Africa with very
powerful and fast (2500 kW at 130 km/h) double Pacifics (4-6-2+2-6-4) in Algeria, and
double Northerns (4-8-4+4-8-4) in East Africa and N.S.W. for freight service.
losalbern
May 4, 2001 - 04:42 pm
I couldn't believe my eyes . This advertisement from a local Home Center outfit had a sale on AMES shovels. Does that ring a locomotive bell or what? Hey, at least three of the big four made their fortune selling AMES shovels to the '49er miners and that was the trigger for the original CP railroad investment money. Then when the UP people were looking for capital they went right to the horses mouth to get the AMES brothers interested and one of them wound up as UP President . Isn't that something? Last January, before this book review, that advertisement wouldn't have meant a thing to me. Now, it spells history. Can you believe they are still making and selling AMES shovels?
losalbern
May 4, 2001 - 04:57 pm
Whoops ! Ann.. I kinda got lost on that posting #591 right after that statement that "Garrat was an Australian".. It went something like this: "A boiler dimensioned up to the full cross section of the loading guage with a firebox and grate unconstrained by wheels" I didn't think any of those fireboxes had wheels so why did they have to clutter up that statement at all. Boy I sure hope this won't be on the final exam. I mean, I'm still trying to underdstand "articulated" !!
losalbern
May 4, 2001 - 05:53 pm
This is one of the most exciting chapters so far. The race is going full tilt and you can sense the tenseness all around. Durant has overspent UPs money getting through Nebraska and the company is running out of credit and owes lots and lots of money. The Omaha bankers want their UP loans to be paid off. The Mormans want their money too. The Up track layers went on strike. And the CP is moving right along. The UP is in trouble and they knew it. Too much cream had been skimmed off the top for the Credit Mobilier treasury leaving too little capital to operate the building of the line. In the year 1868, Credit Mobilier paid dividends to its stockholders amounting to 12.8 million in cash and 4.0 million in UP stock. They had just about milked the old UP cow dry. Newly elected President Grant told Dodge that "there was evidence of a great swindle in the estimates for UP work done in Weber Canyon". Grant said he was prepared to force a complete reorganization of UP which would mean Durant being tossed out of UP. A good chapter !
Ginny
May 4, 2001 - 06:00 pm
hahaha, Losalbern, I believe you are giddy with the joy of the final spike about to be driven! hahaahaha
AMES shovels, well who made that connection besides you!?! We have them all over here, thank you for reminding us and for having more retention of important facts than I do.
I'm putting up Chapters 15 and 16 as we speak, having had a slight derailment here in the form of a truck load of roses and peonies to plant this afternoon, staggered in to find a mouse had somehow contrived to DIE in the back of my brand spanking new Maytag Gemini range (go look THOSE buggers up, they have two ovens below the counter) and watching my husband taking it all (sob) apart. You ought to SEE the inside of those babies, talk about your stainless steel.
ANYWAY, Ann, thank you for that link, you are in total luck BECAUSE I FOUND Williewoody's TRAINS magazine, took me all day yesterday and many long distance phone calls and explanations but I found it!
YES indeedy do and Ann, you really are well set there, there are tons o stuff coming up in Ohio: (and Williewoody, check out page 6 on the bottom left of the supplement? That is near me? Great Smoky Mountains RR)? Yes indeedy!!
Chattanooga is not that far either, much going on there steam wise.
But now Ann!!
The Grant Trunk Western 4-8-4 No. 6325 (ohiocentralrr.com) is about to announce (hold breath) excursions, 170 mile regional system connecting Columbus and other points. They are restoring this thing and did tests in January. And they hope to run farther afield to Detroit....
Arent you close to Cuhahoga? Isn't that where Jeryn lives? Well, that one has a Cuyahoga Valley Scenie Raileoad, doens't mention steam but said vintage locomotives (air conditioning)....www.cvsr.com
Carrollon. Ohio: Scenic 28 mile ride Mid June thru October, steam rides: http://www.AdvantagePages.com/Elderberry
There are a bunch of them in Illinois, too. Union, Illinois: http://www.irm.org/
I gotta have steam, myself. Listen to this one RAILFANS!
Cariboo Steam Special! May 26-28. Charter steam Vancouver to Kelly Lake on the BEC with photo run bys. 386 miles behind No. 3716, a 2-8-0!!!
Waaaa! Wanna go!@
I don't know where Cumberland, Maryland, is, but if it's anywhere near DC I must go there, they have that hotel we spoke of earlier and steam and Diesel excursions through December. "Climb grades of up to 2.8 percent and 1,300 feet in elevation on the 32 mile scenic round trip through the Alleghaney Mountains, over an iron truss bridge, around a 1/2 mile horseshow curve and through a 914 foot tunnel." When are we leaving?
www.wmsr.com
Yes, Chapter 15, the famous Thousand Mile Tree for the UP in the heading and some other thoughts going up!!!
All aboard!!!!
ginny
Ginny
May 4, 2001 - 06:01 pm
Losalbern, we were posting together, what ABOUT that chapter~!!! Poor Brigham Young and dastardly Durant, we need to get him out of the heading!
Hold on!
ginny
MarjorieElaine
May 4, 2001 - 09:45 pm
I had to renew my library book one more time. I find the reading very slow on this book. But I cannot say that I could find a better way to write it than Ambrose did. He was cramming a lot of history into this book. And I also have found it interesting and wanted to keep reading it. I wonder why we did not have Nebraska history when I was in school like they teach Texas history here in Texas. This book shows how interesting Nebraska history is. Maybe they teach it now. If they do, it must be about three-quarters about the effect of the railroads on the growth of the state.
I guess we will talk about this next week as we wind it up, but I notice that we do not discuss the book as Ambrose writes it very much but we have all been fascinated with the subject and our memories connected with the railroad. My mother was born in Montana because her father, a young Danish immigrant, was working on a railroad there around 1900 in order to save money to buy farmland in Nebraska.
After a few years, they came back. My daughter lived in Fargo, ND for a few years and there was a large Chinese population there--she was told they had originally come to work on the railroads there. So as additional railroads were built, the story continued. Marge
Ginny
May 5, 2001 - 05:42 am
I agree, Marge, it's very slow going in places even when as Losalbern mentions, the subject matter is exhilerating.
We originally set this very slow pace at the request of our participants here and I do apologize to those of you who have to continue to visit the library, ahahah
NOW is the perfect time to reflect on how Ambrose wrote the book or anything at all you all would like to say on this book in general. I will freely confess that non fiction is not my milieu and I have no earthly idea how to discuss either a non fiction book or one of history and since we do a lot of these, any and all suggestions are most welcome, let's TRY IT!
Today while we might think that trains are a non issue in America, I have brought Bruce Springsteen's newest anthem, Land of Hope and Dreams to your attention. Unfortunately I can't find a MIDI for this, apparently it's not out yet, and I don't know how to make one, I'll ask Joan G, I do have the CD Writer, but it's astounding to view (as HBO is now showing) Springsteen's last concert in Madison Sq. Garden and see literally thousands of people singing to the repetitive words "This Train..." reproduced below, it was quite haunting. Of course "this" train Springsteen is singing about is quite another sort of train, but don't you find it interesting that the TRAIN continues, in 2001, to be a symbol? Here it is, I wish you could hear the music:
Land Of Hope And Dreams
Grab your ticket and your suitcase
Thunder's rolling down the tracks
You don't know where you're goin'
But you know you won't be back
Darlin' if you're weary
Lay your head upon my chest
We'll take what we can carry
And we'll leave the rest
Big Wheels rolling through fields
Where sunlight streams
Meet me in a land of hope and dreams
I will provide for you
And I'll stand by your side
You'll need a good companion for
This part of the ride
Leave behind your sorrows
Let this day be the last
Tomorrow there'll be sunshine
And all this darkness past
Big wheels roll through fields
Where sunlight streams
Meet me in a land of hope and dreams
This train
Carries saints and sinners
This train
Carries losers and winners
This Train
Carries whores and gamblers
This Train
Carries lost souls
This Train
Dreams will not be thwarted
This Train
Faith will be rewarded
This Train
Hear the steel wheels singin'
This Train
Bells of freedom ringin'
This Train
Carries broken-hearted
This Train
Thieves and sweet souls departed
This Train
Carries fools and kings
This Train
All aboard
This Train
Dreams will not be thwarted
This Train
Faith will be rewarded
This Train
Hear the steel wheels singin'
This Train
Bells of freedom ringin'
losalbern
May 5, 2001 - 08:31 am
It certainly seems ironic that, as Ambrose put it, "of all the people to speak for the UP," Silas Seymour, the so called interfering engineer was the fella who in absolute admiration of all that was accomplished in the building of the railroad , came up with the statement that became the title of this book. "Nothing like it in the world."
FaithP
May 5, 2001 - 11:56 am
We always wanted to claim Silas Seymour as a relative of my great gramdad AAron Seymour they were of the same age group and we wanted them to be cousins but I can not find this out. Maybe with all the stuff I am learning about the family tree business I will finally learn some of these lost relatives. Now there is some discussion in the beginning of this re: NonFiction writers and history writers etc. I think there were remarks made that Stephen Ambrose was not accurate and there were people who felt he slighted one character or favored another. Still he did a wonderful job of telling this story. I have read some of the facts and most of the general outline of this story in other places and studied th history in school here in CA.. And I think we all saw that movie which I can not remember the name of that showed the meeting of the two train lines, east and west. Still this is the first time I have had all the story from East to West told in an interesting way yet sticking to facts and not "fictionalizing" the redition. I for one am pleased and of course the discussion has brought to life more of the story than there was in the book, re pictures and personal memories. It has been a wonderful Train Trip, Articulated Locomotive and all, toot toot. FP
Harold Arnold
May 5, 2001 - 08:24 pm
I suppose I have a one-track mind and I suddenly found my self running four tracks at the same time. Now I have the Dell Dimension running again and I’ll try to be active for the remainder of the discussion. While I have been reading the posts, I must admit I may not have not followed many of the threads discussed during the period of my absence. Interested people might read my recent posts on the “Computer, Software-Windows” board for a summary of the problem.
One of the points that most impressed me in chapter 14 was the ingenious design of the snow sheds built by the CP to keep their track through the mountains open in the winter. I had no idea that such structures, which are essentially extended wooden tunnels, were used. Here are some pictures from several Web sites showing some of the 37 miles of snow sheds included in their system between Sacramento and Promontory Point. After viewing these pictures, I cannot help but wonder how long these original structures lasted before they had to be replaced.
Snow Shed This is from the CP Museum site. It is one of a number of 3 dimensional pictures of the CP road. Note the clutter of unused timber on the ground below the structure. The location of this particular structure is not given.
Snow Shed In Winter This shot indicates that the CP engineers knew what they were doing in locating the shed only where it was necessary. While the shed structure is completely covered with snow the uncovered track in front of it is clear as the approaching train nears its entrance. Ambrose mentions that often sparks from the stack would ignite the roof of the shed..
Painting Donner Pass Shed This is a very small photo of a painting by a Joshua Adam. It is too small to see detail but it does illustrate the type of slope on which a snow-shed structure would effectively protect the track precariously perched on a carved ledge from snow accumulations. The main force of the snow did not bear on the structure, but rolled over it, plummeting harmlessly into the valley below
Photo Summit Station This is an 1880’s shot of a snow shed at the approach to Summit Station, Donner Lake. It is thought to have been the work of a photographer named Charles R. Savage. The picture is midway down the page. Apparently it is for sale and can be had for $275.
Ann Alden
May 6, 2001 - 05:10 am
Thanks, ginny, for all those links to the Ohio Steam RRs. We saw the station in Cuyahoga when we visited Jeryn last year. Did they mention the Orrville trips? We have good friends who lead tours to Pittsburg on that line. Also, did you see the link that I put up to the Ohio Central? Lots on the schedule there.
Lazel, I too got lost in reading that blurb on Meyer's articulated engine but I do think that it was the boiler that had wheels? Good grief, I am confused!
Marjorie, I love your tribute to this book, the author, this discussion etal. This has been the best yet with all of the memories involved after reading the book. Yours especially about the Tahoe/Reno area were so interesting. Isn't history the best?
Harold, do you mean that we can buy the shed or the picture? Hahaha! We saw many snow sheds last summer for the Rocky Mountaineer in Canada which also has an interesting history.
Ginny
May 6, 2001 - 06:25 am
Ann, yes they did mention that, the ads are all over everywhere and it's hard to focus on them, there's an alphabetical listing, too. I've certainly subscribed to this thing!
HAROLD!! You're BACK! Returned from the Land of Dell and Fog, I need to go over and read about your horror experience and thank you for catching what we had in the heading but neglected to mention when we did Chapter 14, the incredible snow sheds, wasn't that fantastic? Thank you for those great links, spectacular, hard to believe, I would never have thought of same.
We'll spend thru this Friday on Chapters 15 and 16 and then Friday will take up the very last chapter: DONE, hahaha and the Epilogue.
I must say that it feels to me as if we, too, are careening toward the finish line and of course we see Mr. Huntington finally saving the day for the CP but the rivalry and excitement continued, really this would make a wonderful movie, I wonder why nobody has?
Somebody write Ron Howard, this is his type of movie!
I agree with Losalbern that it's very interesting that Seymour, due to his position (probably an unenviable one) with Durant, should have voice the title words, but I doubt anybody paid the least bit attention to them till Ambrose picked up on them.
Boy Durant never ever stopped, did he? I believe his animosity and rivalry with Dodge went way beyond anything to do with a railroad, those two alone, along with poor Theodore Judah, would make a fascinating screen play, and when you add Grant and Brigham Young, and Sherman et al to the mix not to mention Crocker, you really have a melange of powerful men, not all pulling together, even with their own sides.
Faith, how interesting, you MUST be related, that's too coincidental for words, let us know as you explore genealogy what the connection IS? Isn't that fascinating???
This was the first mention I had heard of of the second point in the heading, the "...the largest scandal in 19th century American history..." (Chapter 15) That's news to me, was it you?
ginny
FaithP
May 6, 2001 - 01:07 pm
Well in California history we did hear of this great scandal the big four "bilking" money out of the government for the railroad. Still I did not see out right graft or stealing or even the pricing of the contracts being outlandish such as we see with 250.00 screwdrivers and 600.00 toillet seats when building bases for the army and scams like (i)that(/i). The stock manipulation is and was a scandal I guess and I unable to comment as I don't understand what the Credit Mobiliar stuff is all about. Hate to admit my ignorance of stock manipulation but there it tis.
The whole discussion has been amazing to me. I knew how much I enjoyed the book but am pleased to see the enthusiasm of all the others here who made this discussion so vital when the book actually was a slow and rather ponderous read, though histories are usually worse and Ambrose did bring a lot of life to these men who I have read about all my life.. Fp
Ginny
May 7, 2001 - 05:57 am
Well now, Faith, you're making a very good point there: maybe that's the difference in where in this country or another you grow up, what you hear about history? Isn't that interesting? I have heard nothing of that till we started this discussion here but I have heard a LOT about the Lenape indian which I am willing to bet very few of you know anything of. And there was one tribe in Eastern PA too that we heard a lot about as children. Of course, living miles from Washington's Crossing, most of what we heard was Washington slept here, and Gettysburg and the Revolution.
As history continues to be made, and children still attend the same 9 month school schedule, something is going to have to go. The battles of WWI, I predict, will be the first casualties. And in the South there is a lot more emphasis on the Civil War than we ever heard of in the NE schools. Something has to give.
I so totally agree with you on this discussion itself, it's been a true RAILFAN (which is what they call themselves) adventure, and certainly has sparked a new interest in my own heart but I always loved trains, I had just not appreciated the difference they made in this country and I had not been hysterical about STEAM which I now am.
So a good discusion, you learn something, you get a new interest, you hear wonderful personal stories you would not have heard anywhere else on earth and we've still got a week to go! What more can anybody ask?
ginny
Ann Alden
May 7, 2001 - 06:02 am
Harold, I just spent another 10 minutes looking at all the photos in that collection. Very interesting! And pricey!
I hate to finish this book as it means that we won't be talking trains anymore. But, onward and upward! And, it certainly has sparked my interest in the history of trains plus an interest in taking train trips to see this country or any other.
losalbern
May 7, 2001 - 11:47 am
Folks, June and I took Williewoody's advice and went to the Fullerton, Ca. station to see the big old 4-8-4 steam locomotive , the Sante Fe 3751. It is BIG ! All 108ft 7inches, including the tender. The San Bernardino Railroad Historical Society people who restored this locomotive really did a great job. It looks as good as the day in 1927 when it rolled out of the Baldwin Locomotive shops. The engine was on display as a part of the Fullerton's "Railraod Days" and boy was the place crowded. Never realized there were so many people interested in steam locomotive engines and railroads in general. Chances are that my revived interest has a direct correlation to participation in this discussion group with all of you fun and interesting people. Faith, your descriptions of trips over the Sierra passes via train have June and I seriously considering one of our own to Reno and back, just to see where it all took place in those moutainous climes.
Harold Arnold
May 7, 2001 - 04:21 pm
Does any one see a parallel between the young, vibrant, lean and mean UP and CP in the 19th century and the dot com corporations of the past decade? Off course I know of no dot com who got away with paying a 300% cash dividend to stockholders while unable to pay their work force, but the dot com of to-day have a new approach in the stock options given officers and key employees. This method effectively enriches select individuals while often diluting the value of the stock of the holders who put up the cash.
Considering the position of the CP at the far end of a 9,000-mile supply line, it is a wonder that they did as good as they did. Despite the rugged mountainous topography of much of their course and the length of their supply line they appear to have managed to snare about a third of the total mileage from Omaha to Sacramento.
One more observation coming out of Chapter 14, concerning the naming of Reno. I was surprised. Ambrose tells us it was named for an obscure Civil War General, Jesse Lee Reno who was killed in 1862 at the Battle of South Mountain. I had always assumed that it was named for Major Marcus Reno who was a seventh cavalry officer with Custer at Little Bighorn. He survived as he had been sent by Custer to make the initial contact by attacking the far end of the village. Custer was to attack the near end with the main force. This Reno began his attack but met strong résistance. He was able to disengage after the Custer attack began and all the Indians left to fight Custer. I did consider the fact that Little Big Horn battle did not occure until 1876, but rationalized that the town's creation might have been later or an earlier city was renamed.
FaithP
May 7, 2001 - 04:37 pm
I am not sure but I think Reno Springs was there and named right after the gold rush brought the first population to the Carson Valley which would be From Virginia City down to Carson City then on down to Wadsworth(sparks now) and Reno Springs, Purdy, the road over the mountains to Susanville through Beckwith, Quincy and all that country which is eventually the Feather River Canyon down into Orville. During the gold rush days there were huge populations spring up all through the Sierras call "cities" but not permanent and few signs of them today. Between Truckee and Tahoe City a matter of 15 miles there was a tent city of 40,000 people in the Gold Rush days. We school kids use to go down the river to Big Chief and look in wonder at what would have been the center of that huge population. If I had a map handy I would tell you the name of that highway from Reno over through Quincy and Susanville and Janestown then down the Feather River Canyon. Faith
Ann Alden
May 8, 2001 - 06:47 am
Faith, I love your posts! They are taking me back to when we spent a week in Tahoe and I had the use of a car all day and just saw so much of the area that you are talking about. 40,000 people in the area between Truckee and Tahoe? I can hardly comprehend that number since it seems sparsely populated now. Is that along the river?
FaithP
May 8, 2001 - 12:58 pm
Yes Ann that is along the river. I use to wonder about that myself. We would go on school hikes there. And we found hundreds of "artifacts" in the broken down remains of shelters. The prospectors were looking for gold in the river and built for a mile back up the hill(on the other side away from the highway that is there now) and several miles up toward Tahoe from Big Chief. That is about 2 miles up the river from Truckee. The shelters of logs made into leantos and no floors wer the usual and tents of course. I dont know what in the world they did in the winter. I sort of think it was a summer operation and people left when the snow fell. Must have as there was no way to get in an out except by skis and snowshoes, maybe dog teams. My brother and I found lots of whiskey bottles and also those little tiny medicine bottles. My mom though they had opium in them but we didnt know for sure. We found rusty old coffee pots and cans and occasionally a boot all rotted away. Fallen down fireplaces just a big pile of rocks on top of a lot of charcoal was the best way to recognize a shelter site. It was a great place to learn history wasnt it. fp
FaithP
May 8, 2001 - 01:00 pm
PS The Highway out of Reno up through the Sierras is 395. fp
Ann Alden
May 9, 2001 - 09:50 am
Did you know what you had or did you mother have to explain it to you? What a history lesson!
FaithP
May 9, 2001 - 11:51 am
Our mom and our school teacher were a bit conservative about what was in all the bottles we found but my Granddad was willing to tell us anything we wanted to know including what laudlum(sp?), opium, paragoric etc were and how come it was in those funny little bottles. And the whiskey bottles were great, we loved them to play with after they were washed and set up on the fence to dry. No, we did not in those days know how valuable those artifacts might become. I have seen bottle collections that are worth big money now days, and a friend in Placerville goes hunting for them in ghost towns all over Nevada. In a town call Goldfield NV there is a whole house of bottles and the TRAIN STtION and that is all that is th ere. Fp
losalbern
May 9, 2001 - 03:18 pm
I am just curious. Did anyone besides me have to look up that word in a dictionary? I don't ever recall seeing that word in print before. But then I am not the most literate guy you ever ran across either.
losalbern
May 9, 2001 - 03:45 pm
I find it interesting that the Congress, the President and his Cabinet had the final word on the joining of the two railroads. Ogden would become the terminus for the CP railroad even though they never laid their track that far. Congress decreed that CP would pay UP for their line from Ogden to the Promontory Summit and thereafter own it. I suspect that UP agreed to that because they needed money desperatly to pay some of their enormous debt. The UP treasury was just about empty and there was still track to be laid to Promontory Summit. Worst of all, the UP corruption was so apparent that disaster was snapping at the UP heels. Ambrose put it this way. "Just as the (UP) company was on the verge of completing the job, it appeared on the brink of collapse." But the CP was sailing along.
Ginny
May 10, 2001 - 04:18 am
Losalbern, I had not seen that word either, but that's nothing new! Last night I read our last two chapters, the DONE and the Epilogue, which put all of the others in perspective.
So good is the writing that I believe DONE was written first and he should have edited the other chapters a bit.
I was not going to change the heading much but there are so many startling facts and strange occurences I just have to, so tomorrow morning we'll have the last of our saga beginning, and if you haven't completed the book, just read DONE and EPILOGUE and that will answer a lot of questions for you.
I found them fascinating.
And the Ogden thing, I guess they had to do something, why did they wait as long as they DID? When you get to DONE you find there were miles of parallel roads, I guess they were just out of control. The CP did seem to be better managed, didn't it, even WITH those who were running it.
Fascinating, just fascinating.
I loved the whole experience, but those last two chapters blew me away, let's look at them starting tomorrow, if we can.
Faith, how interesting, I never knew half of that. We need our own RAILFAN SN contingent to make an expedition out west!!!!
ginny
Ginny
May 10, 2001 - 04:38 am
Jeepers, Harold, I just read your exciting account of having, it looks like, to completely reinstall your computer. I did not go back to the initial posts, was all that caused by a virus?
ginny
Ann Alden
May 11, 2001 - 06:36 am
GET A MAC! THEY ARE "VIRUS-FREE". ITS AMAZING!!
williewoody
May 11, 2001 - 07:14 am
Adrienne Anderson, an archeologist with the National Park Service, and an authority on the subject, says the present Golden Spike National Historic Site is not where the two railroads actually met. The real site is about a mile away in a farmer's field. One would have to take a dirt road to the place. It is also noted that the two companies actually built 100 miles of parallel track, one of which was never used. Times haven't changed much the government still wastes hugh amounts of money.
About the final meeting, according to my outside source, "What they Didn't Tell you about the Wild West." Crowds cheered in Washington,the cracked Liberty Bell was carefully rung in Philadelphia. A 4 mile long parade was started in Chicago. 100 cannons boomed in Omaha, and San Francisco celebrants unfurled a banner proclaiming "CALIFORNIA ANNEXES THE UNITED STATES"
Four spikes were used - Two gold, one silver, and one a blend of gold,silver and iron. A fifth spike which was a regular one was wired to a telegraph key. The Chinese carried in the last rail from the west, and Irishmen carried in the last rail from the east.
A prayer was spoken "Oh Father, God of our fathers, we desire to acknowledge thy handiwork in this great work.Amen."
The telegrapher signaled." We have got done praying,the spikes about to be presented. The signal will be three dots for the commencement of the blows. DONE."
I found "Nothing Like it in the World" to be a tremendously interesting book. Of course, I am a history and railroad buff, but I also found Mike Wright's book, which I have quoted above and in the past, to be a facinating study of history. Both he and Ambrose have written books about the Civil War period, which I have always been drawn to. I would like to see one of them discussed in this venue, particularly Wright.s "What they didn't tell you about the Civil War" His book on the wild west covered many stories not commonly known.
Williewoody
Ginny
May 11, 2001 - 08:18 am
Williewoody, thank you for that wonderful additional information, all those other spikes and the carefully rung Liberty Bell, I wondered about that myself.
Well,as they tell singers and chorus members, it doesn't matter how much you mess up in the performance, just end with a bang. I think Ambrose did that and I think the most provocative questions to date are in the heading.
I did leave out Ambrose's own assessment of history teachers, did you find that amazing or what??
Am looking for Whitman's Passage to India, but I must say that upon reading the events of the final day I feel enhartened by all the snafus which I hope to get listed here tomorrow, sounds like one of our special days around here, hahaahah, and that bit about Durant, Dodge and Stanford arguing for an hour over who would be able to strike the deciding blow with the hammer was just hilarious and so true to type. So true and THEN Stanford MISSED !! After all that arguing, Stanford MISSED!
They said the blow would be hard "the fartherest of any by mortal man," and he MISSED!!! hahahahah
He hit the rail but it made no difference, the "telegraph operator closed the circuit and the wire went out, 'DONE!'"
hahahaha
I love that, and every strange event which led up to it.
Have you all seen that Hart photo, I have not, please cast your Railfan eye over the topics in the heading and let's give Dr. Ambrose a finish with a BANG!
ginny
Ginny
May 11, 2001 - 08:28 am
Passage to India
by Walt Whitman
In one, again, different, (yet thine, all thine, O soul, the same,)
I see over my own continent the Pacific Railroad, surmounting every barrier;
I see continual trains of cars winding along the Platte, carrying freight and passengers;
I hear the locomotives rushing and roaring, and the shrill steam-whistle,
I hear the echoes reverberate through the grandest scenery in the world;
I cross the Laramie plains—I note the rocks in grotesque shapes—the buttes;
I see the plentiful larkspur and wild onions—the barren, colorless, sage-deserts;
I see in glimpses afar, or towering immediately above me, the great mountains—I see the Wind River and the Wahsatch mountains;
I see the Monument mountain and the Eagle’s Nest—I pass the Promontory—I ascend the Nevadas;
I scan the noble Elk mountain, and wind around its base;
I see the Humboldt range—I thread the valley and cross the river,
I see the clear waters of Lake Tahoe—I see forests of majestic pines,
Or, crossing the great desert, the alkaline plains, I behold enchanting mirages of waters and meadows;
Marking through these, and after all, in duplicate slender lines,
Bridging the three or four thousand miles of land travel,
Tying the Eastern to the Western sea,
The road between Europe and Asia.
ginny
FaithP
May 11, 2001 - 09:17 am
Willywoody it has been wonderful to have your insight and comments on this book and this great endevor completed by some pretty regular human creatures. I don't think there is any "greatest generation" in light of all of history or even just in US history. I am just as impressed by the courage and adventure the families that got on the ships to come to America when they had no idea what was here as I am by the push West by the Railroad generation and of course our own Greatest Generation who fought the second World War. Loslebern you too have added so much to our discussion. And everybody has really, and hasn't Ginny been wonderful with her "amazed" comments. I feel like I have helped her see a little of the Sierra's where I was born and raised. I wish I had a big old house I would invite you all to come and see Sacramento's Railroad Museu, Crockers Museum, and go up to Reno and back. Too bad the old road isn't there anymore. Well I am DONE with this for awhile and am sending my book to my brother to read
Ann I would like to take you down to Big Chief and show you how to find old living sites all fallen down in the forest. It just looks like a pile of rotten trees and rocks all overgrown with brush and weedds but pull it apart carefully and you will find it was a shelter with a hearth and a fireplace with chimneys that are some times still standing a few feet tall.Then you look around for the spot they dumped their garbage. Pull pineneedles and dirt away for a good foot down sometimes to find an artifact. Boy what fun..FP
FaithP
May 11, 2001 - 09:22 am
Ginny there is a travel artical in this months Sonata mag. re a rail trip across America from Washington State to Washington D.C. I read it last evening and enjoyed a vicarious train trip. Emma Wiley wrote Coast to Coast by Amtrack.
http://www.Sonatapub.com
williewoody
May 11, 2001 - 03:14 pm
Hey! this has been great. Thanks for all your kind comments. I love talking about a subject that has been close to my heart virtually all of my life.
Remember if you really want to see this great country of ours, do it by rail. Take plenty of time and stop along the way. Don't be in a hurry (Amtrak isn'T). Relax, and enjoy the scenery, and be sure to keep track of where you are on the timetable, even if you are not on time, which is quite likely. Most folks traveling by train are friendly and not in a hurry like yourself, and watch for me. I don't travel as much as I did a few years ago, but I still have several routes I want to travel before checking into the big railroad hotel in the sky. Hope I can find another great book to "discuss" with y'all. So, so long from the LONE STAR state.
losalbern
May 11, 2001 - 05:15 pm
Gosh, the train pulled out and I am still in the station ! Well I have a few comments I'd like to make. Ginny, I agree that the epilogue is especially good reading. I enjoyed the book, but honestly, I enjoyed the postings even moreso. You and Ann were sooo good with your clickables, as was Harold. I spent a lot of time just jumping from one spot of information to another. Like Williewoody, I read along with another book written by Oscar Lewis called , "The Big Four", and it gave me another insight about those four shopkeepers who managed to build a railroad, through moutains of granite, no less. How they did it is still a wonder to me. Yes, it appears that Huntington was always looking to best someone in any kind of deal that involved money. And some people thought he was not above cheating. Buy cheap and sell high was his credo. He had little respect for his partner Stanford, the politician, who lived the opulent, extravagant lifestyle. On the other hand, he had great respect for his partner Hopkins who lived a careful, inexpensive, subdued life. But Crocker was the real driving force of that group. Crocker was the builder, the pusher, the "get results" guy. I think he gets the most credit for building the CP, even if he swung and missed the golden spike, Ginny! As for the UP, I give Dodge the nod for building that railroad. But my real kudos go you folks who made this discussion group so darned interesting. The next question is, where do we go from here? Best wishes Losalbern
MarjorieElaine
May 11, 2001 - 08:56 pm
I enjoyed this book discussion. Ginny asked if we were surprised--I was surprised at a lot of what I read! And it seems so sad that the great years of the railroads (that we all remember for cross-country travel)ended within 100 years. Thanks to everyone who shared their memories and information--that is what made me stick to it and keep renewing the book at the library one more time! I hope we do another history book. Marge
Ginny
May 12, 2001 - 02:37 am
I'm still here at the station, holding up the flag, the whistle has not blown yet tho I can see our happy participants leaning out the windows and waving happily, it HAS been a joyful journey and I've been surprised at every turn of events, no more so than this last assembling for the driving of the golden spike!
Can you not picture it? Did any of you have similar events in YOUR life? I know when my son got married this past January 27th, my husband found to his shock that the shirt for the tuxedo did not fit and so spent a frantic couple of hours before the wedding driving into town (he had been fitted for the thing weeks before) to get another one and we live WAY WAY out. I don't believe I have ever done anything momentous that something horrendous did not accompany it.
For instance, in my junior year in high school, for some unknown and insane reason they hit on the idea of Junior Monitors for the Senior Graduation and thought it would be pretty if they wore those ball gowns we used to wear? Remember all that crinoline? Well anyway, this was an outside ceremony with hundreds of grads and parents in bleachers and they decided to go arrange the 20 or so Junior Monitors by height and of course U No Hu was the tallest, so U NO HU got to be one of the two leading the pack of grads into the stadium. OK, all that is fine.
U No HU wore a pink strapless crinoline number, very pretty in the long distance arial shots but up close U no Hu, being shy, developed a hideous hive like rash, which started on chest, spread to arms, neck, face, down legs, which were mercifully covered, and looked like a smallpox victim and every time somebody remarked on same it got worse.
So I can appreciate the last day events as the participants sped toward Promontory Point and the final driving of the spike but they ARE hilarious:
As Durant headed to the ceremonies a band of 300 men hijacked his car for payment of wages owed them. The Chinese cut a big fifty foot log which fell right after the first celebratory train passed, trapping Sanford, whose engine was injured.
The UP delegation was delayed due to heavy rains damaging Davil's Gate Bridge.
Stanford's train got stuck looking at a view of the lake in the rain.
Dodge, Durant and Stanford argued for nearly an hour over who should have the honor of placing in the Golden Spike.
Stanford swung and missed, striking only the rail but the telegraph operator sent the wire "DONE!"
It's nice to see that the same people who were capable of building such an engineering marvel are human, too!
I did think they could have invited Mrs. Judah, that was bad, but a lot of the others didn't get to go, either and if you look at the heading, and click on the painting, you can see the identifying remarks of who's who?
Marge, and those of you who kept your libraries hopping, a special thanks for your diligence!
Thank you all very much for your fine participation and remarks, it's been a great journey.
Do we have any last people running for the train? Any last remarks??????
Should we call the "All Aboard?"
ginny
losalbern
May 12, 2001 - 10:48 am
I just brought up the old media player and just as the train is pulling out of the station, I will listen to Ginny's remarkable musical contribution to this fun discussion group, the "Chattanooga Choo Choo".. Good listening ! What a way to go ! ! losalbern
Ann Alden
May 14, 2001 - 06:21 am
Oh, I just read all the kudos and farewells and am feeling tearful! This has been a super discussion and will remain one of my favorites. With Ginny striving to present us with more info than is in the book and loving every minute of it! Lasel and Willie and Faith and Marjorie, its been a blast! Where do we go from here? Maybe take a train trip? I hope you all get to ride an old steam engine train soon. This has been so much fun! All aboard!!
Ann Alden
May 14, 2001 - 07:20 am
Here is a great page about supporting rail travel in the US.
All Aboard Pro Railers
Harold Arnold
May 14, 2001 - 08:12 pm
Ok, we have reached the end of a good book and a good discussion. Hats off to Ginny who certainly made this discussion a rewarding experience for all.
I might in conclusion note the Ambrose comment concerning the 1869 propensity on the part of the two railroad corporations, the press and politicians to use hyperbole to describe the successful completion of the project. I sort of agree with Ambrose who excused the over laudatory assessments on the grounds that considering the state of technology just a few years earlier, it deserved being spoken of as the greatest event in the history of the world and in other words of that effect.
How about events that have come in our lifetime? As a planned project, how did the winning of WW II compare? And the cold war, the lunar landing and subsequent space exploration programs, have these created as much economic and social impact as the 1869 transcontinental railway? After just a moment of deliberation, I easily have concluded that the events of the 20th century have equaled and exceeded the 1869 event by effecting not just the United States and its peoples, but the entire globe and its billions of inhabitants. Just note how much change has occurred effecting life and outlook during our lifetimes. But we need not resort to ridiculous hyperbole in describing these achievements knowing that even more unimaginable and amazing events are yet to come.
Ambrose also noted the unique position of the United States with so much public lands in the hands of the Federal Government available to be used to further the project. This is certainly true and I for one think it was a proper way to finance and obtain the railway system. Most Western European governments were not so lucky with their land long since being used for other public and private purpose. Possibly Russia was an exception?
LouiseJEvans
May 15, 2001 - 12:06 pm
I have my TV on. There has been a story on it about a freight train in Ohio. It was a runaway train. It was first reported that the conductor had had a heart attack or something. Someone finally managed to board it and get it stopped. They did not find a conductor on board.
FaithP
May 15, 2001 - 03:29 pm
Louise that is a mystery. When did that happen. Just now? Wow I am interested in that. If you find out more I would like to knwo about it. Is it an urban legend? Faith
williewoody
May 15, 2001 - 04:39 pm
One last comment. This has been a really CLASS group of people engaged in this discussion. Not once to my memory did anyone get their nose out of joint or express offence to anyone elses comments. Not so in other discussions I have engaged in. It has been such a pleasure discussing this fine book. I really hate to see this come to an end. I love history and am hoping to see some other history books come up for discussion. You folks have been the cream of the crop, one and all. Hope to run into you all again in the future.
FaithP
May 15, 2001 - 08:08 pm
Willywoody if you come across a really good book re: the Lewis and Clark expedition I would be very interested. Now, I know there is one call Sashkatchawan (sp) who is the Indian girl who guided them and did some interperting for them. But there may be a more recent and more accurate one out that is a good reading book too. If you know of one can we see if anyone else would be interested. Faith
Ann Alden
May 16, 2001 - 04:29 am
Faith, there is a good Lewis and Clark book by Thom who wrote "Follow the River" which is also true and fascinating! Can't remeber the name of the Lewis and Clark. I will look it up for you. Its titled, "From Sea to Shining Sea". I notice that he has another out about one of the guides for Lewis and Clark, George Droulliard? Also, one about Indian involvement, titled, Red Chief? Something like that.
Yes, Willie, this is a class group. Everyone was so interested in the others comments. Its really special when a group converses so well with respect for each other's opinion. Should we continue with comments since Miss Ginny is gone for six weeks? I will check with her boss!
Louise, was that train runaway happening now? I haven't heard a word here in Ohio>
I myself am leaving for a week tomorrow to attend our granddaughter's college graduation from Colgate. We are so proud of her!!
Harold Arnold
May 16, 2001 - 07:33 am
Faith, as you probably know the most popular recent Lewis And Clark book to be published in recent years was "Undaunted Courage" by Stephen Ambrose. We had a B & L discussion of this book in 1998. If you have not read this one, I recommend it. Technically it is a biography of Captain Lewis but it certainly centers on the expedition.
I urge you, Ann, and Williewoody and all to visit the History Book Form where you can post your history interests concerning new titles. Obviously many titles mentioned there do not result in B & L discussions, but some do. Examples of discussions of books first brought up on the History Book Forum in addition to "Undaunted Courage" include the more recent "Lies My (History Teacher Told Me." Hope to hear from all who participated here at the History Book Forum.
A final thought on "Nothing Like It In The World" is that the completion of the transcontinental Railroad in 1869 in a sense marked the final fulfillment of the dream of the many from Christopher Columbus to Thomas Jefferson for a Northwest Passage to the Far East. True there was no practical water route. But the tracks provided a practical substitute on rails of iron.
patwest
May 16, 2001 - 07:56 am
Ann Alden
May 16, 2001 - 08:59 am
The news with pictures of the runaway train was just on. Seems that it left the yard in Toledo without anyone at the controls and it got to Canton which is pretty far away before a 52 year old rail employee was able to hop on and get it stopped. We are talking about 100 miles here, friends! It looked like they might have used a helicopter to put the man aboard but I am not sure about that.
LouiseJEvans
May 16, 2001 - 11:20 am
It took 2 hrs but they did catch it. Sort of makes you think of the old west.
FaithP
May 16, 2001 - 04:49 pm
iT DOES make me think of the old west, chasing trains heheheh I guess it is not funny at that considering the cost of the equipment.
Thanks everyone for responses re Lewis and Clark. I have not read Stephen Ambrose's Undaunted Courage but that is on my list of reading for the summer lazy days. And it will be nice to refer to the archived discussion on occasion too, so thanks for the site Pat.
yes, Harold I thought that too, the completion of the rail joining east to west opened the whole world, From Sea to Shining Sea as one book was titled, true it turned out to be on rails but it completed something men had been pushing at for a long time. fp
FaithP
May 16, 2001 - 04:55 pm
Congratulations to Ann Alden's Grand-daughter
losalbern
May 21, 2001 - 04:52 pm
Gosh, this is a new experience for me. Archived! Hmm. Kinda dusty in here. And dark. Hope Ginny brings a dust cloth when she catches up. Here I go again! ACHEWW!