SeniorLearn.org Discussions

Archives & Readers' Guides => Archives of Book Discussions => Topic started by: BooksAdmin on February 27, 2009, 11:29:18 AM

Title: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: BooksAdmin on February 27, 2009, 11:29:18 AM
The Book Club Online  is  the oldest  book club on the Internet, begun in 1996, open to everyone.  We offer cordial discussions of one book a month,  24/7 and  enjoy the company of readers from all over the world.  Everyone is welcome to join in.


Team of Rivals
by
Doris Kearns Goodwin
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(http://seniorlearn.org/bookclubs/teamofrivals/teamcvr.jpg)                         


"More books about Abraham Lincoln line the shelves of libraries than about any other American. Can there be anything new to say about our 16th president? Surprisingly, the answer is yes. - ..... Doris Kearns Goodwin has written an elegant, incisive study of Lincoln......." - New York Times

The Team:
William H. Seward
Salmon P. Chase
Edward Bates
.........     Links:
NPR Review (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4989622)
Wilmot Proviso (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilmot_Proviso)
Dred Scott Decision (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford)
Kansas-Nebraska Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas-Nebraska_Act)
Fugitive Slave Law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Slave_Law_of_1850)
.........
March 1 -  Chapters l-3
March 8 -  Chapters 4-7
March 15 -Chapters 8-11

March 22 - Chapters 12-15
March 29 - Chapters 16-19
April 5 -      Chapters 20-23
April 12 -    Chapters 24 -26

To Consider

1.  Putting Lincoln to one side, which of the men (the rivals) would you most like to meet and why?  Which (if you were a woman) would you most likely marry and why?  Start a business with?

2.  What one quality do each of these men have in common, including Lincoln?  Is that quality necessary for any person who enters politics?

3.  Seward said he discovered “politics was the important and engrossing business of the country.”  Does it still seem that way to you?  How important is it to have a two-party system in our government?

4.  Lincoln had a very strong desire to “engrave his name in history”  and believed that” ideas of a person’s worth are tied to the way others perceive him.”   Do you believe this?  Is this contradictory to the belief in yourself and your own worth?  Your religious faith?

5.  Lincoln had a “strained” relationship with his father.  Is there a possibility that Lincoln was inspired to become a better man, a more educated man, one with a future because of his father?

6.  At an early age, Lincoln lost two of the women he most needed and loved - his mother and sister.  What affect did this have on the boy, if any?

7.  Can ambition ruin a marriage?   Does a wife influence her husband?  Is it necessary to be married to have a political future?

8.  Were you surprised at the passion in the letters quoted in the book? 


Discussion Leaders:
Ella (egibbons28@columbus.rr.com) & PatH (rjhighet@earthlink.net)
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on February 28, 2009, 01:09:45 PM
WELCOME EVERYONE

Here we are on a nice clean page, ready to start our discussion of Goodwin's Book.  It's a good one, isn't it?

We had an interesting time in the pre-discussion which was, in good part, about Lincoln, but here we will concentrate on his rivals and what they meant to him, how they helped or hindered his administration.

There are questions in the heading on the first three chapters of our book.

Let's get started!  The first question is one that you, alone, can answer, having read what the book says about these men, the first three chapters of the book.  This is going to be fun! 

YOUR OPINION, PLEASE!
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on February 28, 2009, 04:19:48 PM
Hi, and welcome to all.  I'm still a bit jet-lagged, so I'll be back in a few hours.  It's good to have started.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: hats on February 28, 2009, 04:54:05 PM
PatH and Ella,

I'm sorry. I have decided not to be a part of discussion. I feel the book is over my head. I will read some of the comments. I hope all of you will have a wonderful and meaningful discussion.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on February 28, 2009, 08:00:43 PM
Here we go!! I must admit, in spite of Goodwin's careful writing to introduce us to these men, I still get them confused. I'd have to look again to see whether I'd like to marry one.

But the short answer is no way!! I'd have to be a politicians wife, meaning I'd spend my life doing all the things I dislike the most: dressing up and meeting and greeting people I didn't know, being endlessly cordial and spending hours listening to boring speeches. And when I was made, the tact-bone was left out: it would only be a matter of time before I stuck my big foot in my mouth and ruined my husband's career. Never mind a career of my own: in that time, it would have been difficult to have one. But not impossible.

I have a question: Goodwin says these four men illustrate the paths taken by ambitious young men to rise at that time. How do you see these paths differing from the paths taken by such young people today?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: BarbStAubrey on February 28, 2009, 11:20:46 PM
Save me a chair please
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 01, 2009, 12:06:51 PM
I can see already that this is going to be a lively discussion. Hats  makes a good point in saying that the book is 'over my head.' It is overwhelming in its detail. I would go so far as to say that the book is a thriller for the political junky, a feast for the history buff, and a revelation for the student of human nature. I'm sure, Hats, the comments will draw you back into the discussion.

I can see where impressions will have to be corrected. How can you talk about boring speeches, JoanK? It was the age of great speeches. Reputations were built on them. Moving a crowd or a roomful of legislators was the order of the day. The true hero was the guy who could make the best speech. Nobody was better on a stump than Abraham Lincoln, even as a lad entertaining his friends.

The questions are very good, provocative. Hardly know where to begin in attempting to answer them. Perhaps I'll store them in my subconscious, like bait, and wait for bites.

Whom would you likely marry? For me, of course,  this is academic. But I would feel inclined to follow Mary Todd's instincts in choosing a husband. She sensed immediately that Lincoln could make it to the White House, where she herself would like to be. Can there be any doubt that she must have kept the hope alive, during the difficult years when Lincoln got discourage?

What did Lincoln and his rivals have in common? The only thing I can think of is ambition. In fact Goodwin harps on that theme, comments on it at every turn. Quotes the rivals themselves on the subject, in the best American sense, not the gloomy, tragic view that Shakespeare tries to unload on his theater patrons.

When all is said and done, which it is not, since we're just setting out in our discussion, the rivals all set out in search of fame. Was one more ambitious than the others? Hardly. But it must be Lincoln who succeeded beyond his wildest  dreams. There he sits enthroned on The Mall, looking down on all the world like a true Olympian. He may have set out wanting to be a poet. Obviously the poetical pursues him throughout his carreer, and beyond.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 01, 2009, 12:25:03 PM
Hats, we'll miss you.  I hope you will at least lurk some, and enjoy whatever appeals to you.

This book has one difficulty at first.  Because Goodwin shifts back and forth among the men, and also back and forth in time a bit, it's hard to keep them straight.  For me, everything fell in place in chapter 3, and i finally got a clearer idea of each man and what happened when in his life.  So anyone who is confused, take heart.

Jonathan, of course you wouldn't want to marry one of them, but, aside from Lincoln, which man would you most like to meet?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 01, 2009, 12:55:09 PM
What a great start!  Thank you all for your posts!

JOAN! You wouldn't like any of them, marry any of them, you cannot visualize yourself being tactful, or dressing up? 

The wives and daughters of our rivals were so important to these politicians and Goodwin follows them faithfully through the book.   Seward, of N.Y., had his beautiful Frances, a remarkable women; Bates, of Missouri,  had Julia and Chase, of Ohio, after burying three wives, was fortunate that his beautiful daughter, Kate, loved the role of hostess.

The three men are first introduced on page 10 of our book.

And to answer your good question about young men I think ambition is a quality all young politicians must have; whether yesteryear or today.  Certainly they do not go into politics for the money!  It helps, but Rockefeller never made it all the way

PAT, I am so glad you made it there and made it here!  We need you!

HATS, do follow along with us on this journey.  Three chapters of the book at a time; the first chapter introducing us to the rivals, the second and third chapters informing us of their rise to power, their families and influential friends. 

BARBARA, you have a chair right beside me and I'm waiting for your comments, your insight!

JONATHAN, I agree.  I love a good speech, although I think a few of them would, for me, be appreciated better if I read them, rather than stood for an hour or so and listened.  For example, Lincoln's Cooper Union speech, the speech that launched his bid for the presidency.

http://showcase.netins.net/web/creative/lincoln/speeches/cooper.htm

I need to read it to understand all the nuances, the effect on its listeners and particularly the effect on the South!  Wow!

And there was Lincoln in NEW YORK - Seward's home state!  The battle begins.

Do join us as we follow all of them!

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 01, 2009, 01:53:25 PM
If I had to pick one of these men for a partner, it wouldn’t be Chase, but then he is from my home state, shouldn’t I be loyal?  He’s very tall, dignified, very religious, neither smoked or drank, wealthy,  a governor.; all traits of character that any woman would want as a husband, and obviously he had no trouble with finding wives.  Three of them, all died young!  Imagine the heartache! 

Goodwin, to me at least, seems to write with greater enthusiasm of Seward, the Easterner, a great speaker, witty, wealthy,  one who “could inspire a cow with statesmanship if she understood our language” (Henry Miller).  Very radical in his opinions, particularly on slavery  (as all these rivals were), he practiced law for a few years and finding it boring, he turned to politics.

Did it seem to you that Goodwin is favoring Seward?

Bates, the man of the west, a former slaveholder who emancipated his slaves, was recruited to run by powerful friends in Congress.  Julia, his wife, had 17 children!!!!  Forever pregnant, only eight of them survived.  Perhaps Julia wanted him to leave home??  No, No, they were a very close and loving family and one wonders why he accepted the challenge! 

But keep your eye on a friend of his from Missouri - Francis Preston Blair.  Perhaps you have knowledge of the Blair House in Washington, D.C.?  I am sure  you do!!

Now how about Lincoln?  What do you think?  His rivals were all wealthy, educated men, how did he stack up?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 01, 2009, 05:18:03 PM
As i am listening to the book on cd's until i get the hard cover from the library, i'll just respnd to you comments, because it's hard to keep all the details in my head.

Yes, Ella, Doris and i would be rivals for Seward's hand. He sounds like the most interesting man of the three and seems to be closest to my personal philosophy about issues and being "witty and wealthy" doesn't diminish his appearl!............I know i would not be drawn to Chase, he sounds too straight-laced for me, and I'm pretty sure i would not be drawn to the "melancholy" Lincoln. Altho, his wit and story-telling and a way of turning a phrase  might change my mind. I remember at the beginning Kearns says someone described him as looking very sad until he started to speak and then his whole face changed, so I might be persuaded by his personality when he wasn't melancholy..............jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 01, 2009, 06:31:01 PM
I find it interesting that Seward said politics was the important and engrossing business of the country, since i have taught that it was television that has made politics such a prominent topic of discussion in our society.
I had the sense that because people would not know what their politicians looked like, or did not hear about them every day or even every week or month that it would be difficult for them to be engrossed in politics.
Many people did not read, so it would only be what they heard about the issues or the politicians from others that would give them a framework to have an opinion. For those who did read, they might seldom see a newspaper or a broadside giving them any information.
I always stressed to my students about how different it would be not to have radio and television, or magazines or newspapers, now i'm wondering if i over did that?...............................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 01, 2009, 07:25:56 PM
JONATHAN: "How can you talk about boring speeches, JoanK? It was the age of great speeches."

Yes, but I'll bet that for every great speech there were 100 boring ones. Have you listened to Congress, lately? And by the time the great speech came along, my feet would hurt too much from standing to listen.

MABEL: When I lived in Israel, there was no TV. Although there were Radio and newspapers, many Israelis were just learning Hebrew. In spite of this Politics was the number one sport.

Remember, the people of Lincoln's era didn't have movies, national sports, soap operas etc. So where are they going to get their dramas from, if not politics? (As I spent the morning flipping back and forth between a Lakers game and a budget hearing).
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: bellamarie on March 01, 2009, 07:43:09 PM
Ella, hello!  I am going to lurk and learn if you don't mind.  I have so many committments for this month, and I was absolutely horrible in history.   I am amazed at all the knowledge you all have.  I am so excited Senior Learn is up and running! 
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 01, 2009, 09:00:32 PM
Welcome, Bellamarie!  By all means lurk. The book is so wide-ranging that you are bound to find things that interest you.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Mippy on March 02, 2009, 08:20:45 AM
Hi, everyone!  I'm not sure I'll be able to participate as things
are getting busy this month.   But I have read several chapters.

Driving ambition is surely what all of these men have in common.

I find it odd to speculate on who to marry ... this is rarely how
I think when I read non-fiction.   But enjoy the imagination
if you like that.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: hats on March 02, 2009, 08:48:34 AM
Three chapters a week ??? I won't get another chance like this one. I will enjoy reading comments. I prefer to lurk some others here. Thanks for the encouragement.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: hats on March 02, 2009, 10:04:09 AM
I can't see what is immediately in front of me. Is the chapter schedule in the heading? Thanks.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 02, 2009, 12:59:28 PM
That's strange, hats, the schedule is gone from the heading--it was there.  Yes,this week, starting March 1, is Chapters 1-3, etc.  Thanks for noticing.  I'll get it fixed.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 02, 2009, 01:28:14 PM
"I'm pretty sure i would not be drawn to the "melancholy" Lincoln" - Jean

You're doing fine listening to the CD, JEAN, and thanks for your comments!  Lincoln's personality is unpredictable, isn't it?  He's very depressed at times (all authors seem to use the word, "melancholy" in regards to him); even to the point of going to a doctor with his problems, long before pschologists became the route to mental health.  At one point, he was so depressed that he  said he was "willing to die, but that he had done nothing to make any human being remember that he had lived."  (pg.99).

A propellant into politics?  Obama-like?   Being remembered, making a difference.

Do you think about being remembered?   Does it matter to you?

BELLEMARIE!  Hello my friend!  Yes, do linger and you may even be inspired to get the book.  It reads well and we are going slow!   It will be a good discussion, a "lively" one, as Jonatha said.

Thanks, MIPPY, for your comments.  Keep reading and making a post now and then.

Why not speculate -  use our imagination, - as we read history?  WHAT WOULD WE HAVE DONE DURING THE PRE-CIVIL WAR DAYS?  WHICH SIDE WOULD WE BE ON? 

Was it true then, as now, that our environment when young determines our attitudes, our pursuits?  If you  had lived in the south and had slaves, would you free them?  Would you be a confederate?  On the side of the Union?

Was it all about slavery or states' rights?  Speculation.

But we are getting ahead of our assignments.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 02, 2009, 01:31:41 PM
Where did those chapter assignments go?  Well, PAT is going to fix the problem.  Thanks!
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 02, 2009, 04:08:43 PM
I found out lately that at the same time that the US was argueing about slavery, Russia was going through the same thing to free the serfs (who were in effect slaves). They were able to do so peacably.

Why, at this time, do people find themselves unable to tolerate a system that had been tolerated for generations?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 02, 2009, 04:11:11 PM
Was it about slavery? States rights? The clash between manufacturers and landowners for power (as some European analysts say?) All of these?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: hats on March 02, 2009, 04:45:23 PM
Quote
I found out lately that at the same time that the US was argueing about slavery, Russia was going through the same thing to free the serfs (who were in effect slaves). They were able to do so peacably.
JoanK

I remember learning about serfdom in school. The problem is I can't remember the difference between American slavery and serfdom in Europe. I do believe to be a serf was an easier burden. If a person looks physically different from the captor, I feel the burden is heavier for the enslaved person.

http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/s028.htm (http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/s028.htm)

Thank you Pat and Ella and PatH for the chapter schedule.

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: bellamarie on March 02, 2009, 05:22:05 PM
Ella, you know I can be lively from our past discussions.   :-[
I'm still trying to get through all your pre discussion posts.  How very interesting.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: BarbStAubrey on March 02, 2009, 06:29:12 PM
As I remember Serfs are tied to the land where as slaves are owned by a master and go with the master.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: hats on March 02, 2009, 06:37:18 PM
Barbara,

That's my understanding too.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 02, 2009, 10:36:32 PM
'Was it all about slavery or states' rights?  Speculation.

But we are getting ahead of our assignments.' Ella, post 19

Yes, that's all down the road, awating these ambitious young men, striving for fame and glory. How eager they are to run the race...and win. Suffering under a hail of slings and arrows, they are nevertheless determined to fight on to reach their goal. Pity the young Lincoln:

'willing to die, but that he had "done nothing to make any human being remember that he had lived..." '

or the somewhat older Chase:

'Sometimes I feel as if I could give up - as if I must give up. And then after all I rise and press on.'

In his diary, years earlier, Chase had reminded himself how he was eager to overcome the obstacles and difficulties in his way...'ere I could hope to reach the steep where Fame's proud temple shines, (complete with) deserved honor, eminent usefulness and a "crown of glory" '. 'But death has pursued me incessantly ever since I was twenty-five....Sometimes I feel as if I could give up....' p41

Too true. After losing three beloved wives.

Lincoln's melancholy seems more problematical. Goodwin suggests in her introduction that it was a temperamental thing with Lincoln. The crisis of 1841 seems to have been a matter of his world falling apart. He had broken up with Mary. He was losing his best friend, Speed, with whom he had shared digs for several years. The suffering left its mark on him, but also gave him strengths to see him through the trials of the future.

The other two rivals seemed to have got through life unscathed. Seward went on from glory to glory in his political career. I get the impression that Bates was coming out of retirement, for one more fling at high office.

And doesn't Goodwin get a lot of drama into her story. It's nice to see the wives being drawn into the plot. And the daughter Kate Chase. I'm sorry we never get to meet Mary Ellen McClellan, who was always getting those letters straight from the battlefield, from her commanding husband...writing letters when he should have been fighting.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: marjifay on March 02, 2009, 10:49:25 PM
Hi all-- I'm late getting started.  But the book and discussion are really interesting.  Yes, Jonathan, there is a lot of drama here, isn't there?

Am just getting past Goodwin's very interesting descriptions of the four men waiting anxiously for the results of the nomination process.  Did they have telephones then?  I guess they had to rely on that morse code gadget--what was it called?

Anyway, the one man I know I wouldn't have been able to live with is Salmon Chase.  Appropriate name (fish, and a cold one at that!)  He seemed to want to have every minute of his time planned.  I like spontaneity --doing things on the spur of the moment just because they're fun.  He didn't believe in the theater or novels.  That would never do.  And of course my being an atheist would help either.  I suspect his three wives may have died of boredom!

Wikipedia (and probably this book also) says Lincoln had only eighteen months of formal schooling.  That's amazing.  I too wondered who or what goaded Lincoln's ambition after reading about his father. 
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 03, 2009, 10:32:57 AM
I have only a few minutes this morning, just enough time to read all your posts!

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR INTEREST!

In the book, Exploring Abraham Lincoln's 'Melancholy' Siegel states that the principal factors behind depression are biological predisposition and environmental influences and goes to examine the particulars of Lincoln's mental problems.   You might find it interesting:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4976127

Also, there is short video of our author, Goodwin, being interviewed on that same NPR site.

JEAN made an interesting comment and I quote: "Seward said politics was the important and engrossing business of the country -   i have taught that it was television that has made politics such a prominent topic of discussion in our society."

Perhaps.  How would it have been in those days - the early 1800's?   So much to discuss besides the weather and the crops! 

Back later.................  on my way to the dentist.


Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 03, 2009, 11:26:02 AM
My husband was from Springfield, Il, and one thing to do when visiting his mother was to go look at New Salem, which is about 30 miles away.  It's a good way to appreciate what Lincoln accomplished.  It's so limited, so sparse, so small, just basic necessities.

The other men we're reading about all had good starts.  They were relatively well-off to start with, though some of them had stretches of poverty or had to go live with relatives.  They all had good educations, and help of one sort or another.

Lincoln had nothing, absolutely nothing. Everything he accomplished was done completely by the sheer weight of his own ability, and looking at this teeny place where he honed his legal sklls and ran for the state legislature drives this home.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 03, 2009, 11:49:46 AM
Here's a link to some pictures of New Salem:

http://www.galenfrysinger.com/new_salem_illinois.htm (http://www.galenfrysinger.com/new_salem_illinois.htm)


It's kind of annoying to work through, but lots of good pix.  The ones on the opening page aren't so interesting, but between the red words New Salem and the pictures are squiggles labeled Lincoln's store, villagers, and village businesses, which lead you to more.

At the top are more squiggles, one of them Lincoln's home.  Bob had some unkind things to say about that horsehair sofa.  His grandmother had one almost like it, and it turns out that the horsehairs break off and stick up--sharp little points to torment the bottom of a little boy who is supposed to be sitting still.  Bob's parents are buried within sight of Lincoln's tomb.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 03, 2009, 07:13:54 PM
Great pictures, PATH, so clear.  If I had baked a cake in that crude manner, that is all I could have done that day, I think???  What hard work they all did!  "Down by the old mill stream" - I saw the old mill, and all the others.  THANK YOU!!!

I was thinking of JEAN'S statement about the news and MARJIFAY'S question about telegrams (yes, they had them!) and I tried to find a site about postal history.  The only one was:

http://www.usps.com/postalhistory/significantdates.htm?from=PostalHistoryCenter&page=SignificantDates

which is interesting.  The pony express was just coming in.  I know the city folks got the newspaper, didn't Benjamin Franklin start a printing press a few decades ago?  How did rural folk get the news?  When they came into town?  You can understand how they would have stood for an hour, two hours or so, to hear a political speech, particularly one from Lincoln who used simple stories to illustrate his points. And they probably talked about that speech for days, weeks!

I think the news on TV became entertainment when cable came in; all these commentators competing for the good story.  Much as reporters used to do, but different in that they are alive and in our homes.  I don't know whether it is good or not. 

HELLO MARJIFAY I'm so happy  you made it here and are joining us!  You and Lincoln would have made it together, he was not a religious man according to Goodwin, if I remember rightly. 

But Chase must have been a bit more friendly than we are all giving him credit for; his daughter loved him dearly and he wooed and married three wives.  His friendship with Stanton (who plays a big part in Civil War politics) is curious; they wrote very loving letters to each other, one of which from Stanton says "let me take you by the hand, throw my arm around you, say I love you." 

THANKS, JONATHAN, for your comments, always appreciated, always right on the mark.  I agree, drama makes Goodwin's writing easy to read, she has a knack for getting into the characters, making them come alive.  As we follow these four men from their early political lives through the Civil War, we feel we know them very well.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 03, 2009, 09:37:56 PM
Chase......His friendship with Stanton (who plays a big part in Civil War politics) is curious; they wrote very loving letters to each other, one of which from Stanton says "let me take you by the hand, throw my arm around you, say I love you." 

Goodwin points out that friendships between men that seem to us to be rather romantic were common then, and didn't necessarily have any erotic component.  She gives several examples: Seward had a close friendship with the newspaper publisher and political boss Thurlow Weed.  This was interrupted by the close attention of state senator Albert Tracy, which annoyed Seward, who stayed away in a sulk.  Seward eventually chose Weed, whereupon Tracy turned his attentions to Seward's wife.  The friendship was not physical, but a close intellectual friendship between a married woman and another man wasn't considered respectable, and she broke it off.

Lincoln had a very close friendship with Joshua Speed, the storekeeper he met when he first came to Springfield.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 04, 2009, 09:45:05 AM
Thanks, Pat, for the comment by Goodwin.  Here I believe that our author, in making a personal comment, is correct because we cannot judge behaviour of people by today's standards.  Or history.  Still the word "curious" is not a judgment, just my own opinion. 

Can we give a bit of consideration to the question of self-worth?  Do you see yourself as "others see you."  What is your basis for what your life is worth?  And how does one know what value others place upon your friendship, your love? 

Lincoln's believed, or stated,  that "” ideas of a person’s worth are tied to the way others perceive him.”   
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 04, 2009, 11:15:11 AM
"We do not deal much in facts when we are contemplating ourselves" - Mark Twain  (smile)

"Of all the opinons which people entertain, the best one is that which they have of themselves."
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 04, 2009, 12:24:24 PM
Was Salman Chase's first wife an atheist? The following quote suggests  she may have been. The quote also throws a curious light on the uses made of a belief in the hereafter. Abe Lincoln, who could not accept the belief, admitted it would have been a great comfort after the death of his sweetheart Ann Rutledge.

For Chase it was a terror:

'Worst of all, Chase feared that Kitty had died without affirming her faith. He had not pushed her firmly enough toward God. "Oh if I had not contented myself with a few conversations on the subject of religion" he lamented in his diary, "if I had incessantly followed her with kind and earnest persuasion...she might have been before her death enrolled among the professed followers of the Lamb. But I procrastinated and now she is gone.

'His young wife's death shadowed all the days of his life. He was haunted by the vision that when he himself reached "the bar of God" he would meet her "as an accusing spirit," blaming him for her damnation. His guilt rekindled his religiious commitment, producing a "second conversion," a renewed determination never to let his fierce ambition supersede his religious duties.' Page 42-3

Without the hope of heaven, Lincoln was left brooding unhappily whenever he imagined the cruel  elements battering Ann's grave. I believe Lincoln did call on God when it suited his purpose, or assuaged an inner demon, but by and large he was a constitutionalist, and committed as well to the principles enunciated in the declaration of independence. He knew his Constitution inside and out. And that in the end made him a great president
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 04, 2009, 12:34:19 PM
I know you said this is coming later, but i need to throw this in while i'm still remembering it..............Ella asked - Why, at this time, do people find themselves unable to tolerate a system that had been tolerated for generations? We have to go back to the Enlightenment, the 18th century, to a time when people were beginning to think about individuals' rights and the limitations of gov't - i.e. people have the right to select their gov't and to remove it if it's not working for them (political theory of John Locke and others)...................leading to our Dec of Independence, the American Rev, the French Rev, and a discussion about whether serfdom and slavery are appropriate behaviors of society. Some European countries had abolished slavery before our Civil War. It was a liberal political/social period and led to many improvements for individuals thruout the western world.

No telephones yet, but yes, the telegraph had been invented and for the first time information could move faster than a person could walk or ride......think about that.............The pony express had operated in the West, but was very soon overcome by the use of the telegraph. The pony express lasted only about a year, even tho it has been romantically talked about and pictured so that it seems as tho it must have been around for a longer period of time.

Yes, Ben Franklin was a printer and operated a print shop and post office in Philadelphia. You can see it replicated in Franklin Square on Market ST in Philly today. He actually had the postal contract for much of the east coast in the colonial and federalist periods and published newspapers in sev'l east coast cities. So, newspapers were available in the cities, rural people probably saw them a few weeks or months later. People got news by frequenting the taverns or inns were traveling people stopped and where newspapers and letters were often read aloud. 

Political speeches would have been one the dramas of the day, along w/ the traveling evangelists and some ministers, who provided drama in their sermons and especially at tent meetings.

I've often said to students, or people in my management training sessions, that we should all have a person follow us around for 5 days w/ a video camera so we could see ourselves in the way that others see us...............wouldn't that be interesting? What would we learn about ourselves - those unconscious body movements, words and inflections we didn't know we used? And i agree w/ Lincoln that we feel good about ourselves if others seem to approve of the things we say and do. .................wheewww! Soooo much to think about.........jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: marjifay on March 04, 2009, 01:04:05 PM
Jonathan, that was a very interesting post about Salmon Chase and his worry that he'd not talked to his wife enough about religion before she died, and was fearful apparently that he would not meet her in heaven, or that she'd blame him for her damnation.  That must have been a real worry to someone like him who believed all that stuff.  Sad as well.  (I assume you were quoting from Goodwin's book.)

I found a biography of him at Amazon that looks good, and I think I'll read it:  SALMON P. CHASE by John Niven.  Readers there give it 4-1/2 stars out of 5.  Booklist review says about it: "A brilliant account of the public and personal life of one of the most complex and fascinating major figures of the Civil War era.  Niven's smooth but thorough biography reminds us of the importance to history of a long-forgotten player."

By the way, I wonder what the correct pronunciation of his first name is
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 04, 2009, 06:07:38 PM
The question about which man you would like to marry brings up many issues.  To be honest I have to say I would not have wanted to be a woman in that time frame.  The death rate in childbirth as well as child mortality was very high.  Women were constantly pregnant.  Our forefathers referred to their fecund wives as "breeding and teeming."  One of the men ( can't recall which one) lost one wife in childbirth and a young child a few years later.  Medical care was primitive.  It wasn't until about 1910 with the passage of the Flexner act that the study of medicine really came into its own and strict laws determined education and the practice of medicine. 

Women in that period had no legal rights.  Their status was not that different from that of slaves.  Under English common law which influenced our our legal system man and wife were one and that one was the husband.  They could not vote, own property, obtain custody of their children in the rare case of divorce.  In the 1850's Susan B. Anthony appeared before the New York State legislature in the hopes of changing the laws.  A divorced woman with children was compelled by law to turn over her children to her husband even if that husband was an alcoholic. The same was true for her wages.  He had the legal right to her money even if that meant that her children would starve.

One of the men's wives had fourteen children, but who knows how many pregnancies she had.  Women had no control over their reproductive rights.  In desperation many resorted to abortion.  It is not very well known that in l9th century Protestant America abortion was the major form of birth control, either with herbal abortificiants or the horror of surgical abortion with the use of pain killers.

Modern women sometimes forget the benefits that we enjoy due to the work of the Seneca Convention and our early "foremothers." 
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 04, 2009, 11:39:48 PM
The Book Club Online  is  the oldest  continuing book club on the Internet, begun in 1996, open to everyone.  We offer cordial discussions of one book a month,  24/7 and  enjoy the company of readers from all over the world.  Everyone is welcome to join in.

Team of Rivals
by
Doris Kearns Goodwin

(http://seniorlearn.org/bookclubs/teamofrivals/teamcvr.jpg)                         

"More books about Abraham Lincoln line the shelves of libraries than about any other American. Can there be anything new to say about our 16th president? Surprisingly, the answer is yes. - ..... Doris Kearns Goodwin has written an elegant, incisive study of Lincoln......." - New York Times

The Team:
William H. Seward
Salmon P. Chase
Edward Bates
.........     Links:
NPR Review (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4989622)
Wilmot Proviso (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilmot_Proviso)
Dred Scott Decision (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford)
Kansas-Nebraska Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas-Nebraska_Act)
Fugitive Slave Law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Slave_Law_of_1850)

March 8 -  Chapters 4-7
March 15 -Chapters 8-11
March 22 - Chapters 12-15
.........
March 29 - Chapters 16-19
April 5 -      Chapters 20-23
April 12 -    Chapters 24 -26
To Consider in Chapters 4-7

1.  What compromises did each of the four men make with his beliefs in order to further his political career?

2.  Was the Civil War inevitable?  Can you imagine any way the disagreement over slavery could have been resolved peacefully?

3.  What were the strengths and weaknesses of each man as a potential presidential candidate?

4.  President Obama is very conscious of the heritage of Lincoln.  Do you see any parallels between the issues described in the book and those facing Obama now?

5.  Some of the anti-slavery faction believed that if slavery were confined to its existing boundaries, economic and historic forces would eventually cause it to disappear in the South.  Could this have happened?  How?

6.  The Northwest Ordinance of 1787; The Missouri Compromise (1820); The Wilmot Proviso; The Compromise of 1850; The Kansas-Nebraska Act; The Dred Scott Decision; The Lecompton Constitution.
These were milestones in the tug-of-war between slavery and anti-slavery factions.  What did each of them do?

7.  What were the political attitudes of the candidates’ wives?  Did they play any part in the campaign?

8.  How was Lincoln’s campaign for the presidential nomination more clever than those of his rivals?

9.  What effect did Lincoln’s Cooper Union speech have?


Discussion Leaders:
Ella (egibbons28@columbus.rr.com) & PatH (rjhighet@earthlink.net)

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 04, 2009, 11:48:02 PM
LUCKY: good points about the role of women. Women like Seward's wife, who managed to have a large role in her husband's decisions are even more impressive.

I'm impressed with how close these busy ambitious men were to their wives, and how strong thier feelings toward them seem to be. I wonder if that is true today.

On serfs: I read a very interesting article comparing Russian serfdom to American slavery. Their legal situation was very similiar: serfs did belong to indeviduals, just as slaves did. They could be bought and sold, done with whatever the master wished, their children were also serfs. House serfs were treated like slaves: could be beaten or treated well, as the master chose.

The difference lay in the system of agriculture.Serfs were owned by a few large landowners, who usually owned thousands (few American slaveholders owned even 100). These were absentee landowners. The serfs lived in villages where they were in effect independent, with their own mayors, officials, etc. Part of their time was spent on the landowners land, and part on their own. Some serfs even got rich and owned serfs of their own. While there was an overseer, he couldn't mistreat the serfs as slaves were mistreated because he was so outnumbered.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 05, 2009, 10:33:53 AM
WOW!  WHAT GREAT POSTS!

It just goes to prove that when you get people who love to read together and their interests are wide-ranging and full of ideas, you learn so much!

We could go on and on about marriage, religion, politics, women, pregnancy!

Wonderful.  Thank you all.

Now we should go back to the book:

THE MISSOURI COMPROMISE AND THE BEGINNING OF THE CIVIL WAR

1820!  (pg. 61)  "For Southerners invested in slave labor, Northern opposition to Missouri's admission as a slave state posed a serious threat to their way of life.  At the height of the struggle, Southern leaders declared their intent to secede from the Union; many Northerners seemed willing to let them go."

What a time to be alive for a politician.  Take your position, run for office, make a difference and many did.  Stephens and Lincoln started their famous debates; Bates became governor of Missouri, the Republican and Democratic parties emerged; the beginning of national conventions and it is fair to say that"politics was the important and engrossing business of the country."

As it is now, in my opinion. 

Lincoln attended the River and Harbor Convention in Chicago in 1840 and was described in Horace Greeley's paper, the New Yorker (later the powerful New York Tribune) as a "a tall specimen of an Illinoisian, just elected to Congress from the only Whig District in the State.  It was Lincoln's first mention in a paper of national repute."

I love to read sentences like that last one.  Today Lincoln is the subject of the most published books in America. 

What are your thought on the chapter titled "THE LURE OF POLITICS."

Does it strike you that becoming a lawyer is the first step into successful politics?  Obviously our new young president believes that also.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 05, 2009, 06:48:16 PM
This is PatH talking from JoanK's computer.

?[/color] And i agree w/ Lincoln that we feel good about ourselves if others seem to approve of the things we say and do.

"Lincoln already possessed the lifelong dream....the desire to prove himself worthy, to be held in great regard, to win the veneration and respect of his fellow citizens."  Goodwin, p 87

"Ideas of a person's worth are tied to the way others perceive him."

"Unable to find comfort in...afterlife in heaven, he found consolation that in the memories of others some part of us remains alive" p 100.

Lincoln's desire for fame, present and future, was his big motivation, ruling his whole public life.

His rivals, too had this particular variety of ambition, for power, and importance and the fame of public life.

My personal philosophy is quite different.  Of course the admiration of others makes you feel good, but the real measure of your worth is whether you yourself feel you have done a reasonable job of living according to your standards.  Maybe that's why I'm not a politician.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 05, 2009, 08:27:26 PM
I hear you PAT, from Joan's computer!  And I am with you and that is why I am not a politician!

Having more time this evening to comment on everyone’s posts I do want thank everyone  of you for your interest, truly! 

JONATHAN stated:

“I believe Lincoln did call on God when it suited his purpose, or assuaged an inner demon, but by and large he was a constitutionalist, and committed as well to the principles enunciated in the declaration of independence.”

Carl Sandberg tells this story about Lincoln after he attended a revival meeting wherein the Rev. Cartwright asked the following:

 "Mr. Lincoln, you have not expressed an interest in going to either heaven or hell. May I enquire as to where you do plan to go?" Lincoln replied: "I did not come here with the idea of being singled out, but since you ask, I will reply with equal candor. I intend to go to Congress." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln_and_religion)

 Thanks, JONATHAN, I think you are right on the money!

JEAN, your knowledge of the history of that period is wonderful; being a history teacher you add much to our conversation.  Thank you!   Speaking of newspapers as you said “newspapers were available in the cities, rural people probably saw them a few weeks or months later. People got news by frequenting the taverns or inns were traveling people stopped and where newspapers and letters were often read aloud.”

And the newspapers even traveled overseas. 

Our book speaks of Seward traveling in Europe for three months and was able to read news of America in library reading rooms.  He said of his trip that:

“He realized, in visiting the old, oppressed, suffering Europe,  the fearful responsibility of the American people to the nations of the whole earth, to carry successfully through the experiment….that men are capable of self government.”

We are still attempting that and failing in areas, I believe!

MARJIFAY, get the book, I’ll get it to, it sounds very good.  What a brave man he was to face down that mob that attacked the owner of a shop  printing an abolitionist a weekly newspaper.  He faced it alone and the mob backed off and it profoundly changed his life; changed his future actually, so Goodwin says. (pg.109)

I wonder if there are books about Seward and Bates, equally as interesting!  I’ll look them up!  That you for that post!

LUCKY, yes, and aren’t we lucky, as you say, to live in a time when child prevention methods and healthy children are possible.  I remember my grandmother telling me that there were 13 children in her family and when I asked how they all managed, she told me that they lived on a farm and everyone worked very hard.  They needed child labor on the farm, self-sufficient farms, and the children were lucky to get through the sixth grade.  We need to be reminded of our foremothers now and then and thank you!

I watched a very good video entitled IRON-JAWED ANGELS, starring Hillary Swank, who portrayed the women’s movement, particularly Alice Paul. 

Have you seen it?  Very good and I think Swank is a great actress.

HELLO JOAN!  I don’t know much about those serfs, I think most of us have read or heard references to them throughout history, but I didn’t know that “Serfs were owned by a few large landowners, who usually owned thousands”    Heavens!  And the serfs lived in cottages on the land?  Those large castles in Europe were built by serfs, I suppose?  Did they get a share of the crops? 

Thanks for that bit of history; we will soon get into the discussion of slavery issues that almost burst this country apart.  The tumult of those times!  I am sure there are innumerable books written about this period of American history, and, of course, all schools and universities study it.  This book is just a minor part of the whole period.  One wonders if these “rivals” of Lincoln, or Lincoln himself, had any idea of what lay ahead of them!

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 05, 2009, 10:44:27 PM
Are we at the point in the book of talking about the Kansas-Nebraska Act yet?.........i'll wait to comment until i get your answer. I listened to that part today on the dvd.

Ella - I met Alice Paul - the REAL Alice Paul  - here in a Moorestown, NJ Quaker nursing home on her 92 nd birthday the year before she died in 1977. She was a fascinating woman. In 1985, which was her centennial year, a small group of us started the Alice Paul Centennial Foundation and had a dinner that honored some women who were "first" - one was Sally Ride who had just come back from space. We tho't we might buy a tombstone for her grave w/ the money that we made from the dinner at which we had over 250 people. ......... long and short of it, we are still in existence, have bought her childhood home and have turned it into an institute to teach leadership skills to women and girls, and educates people about AP and women's history in general. See www.alicepaul.org ............what a ride that has been......................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 06, 2009, 09:39:02 AM
JEAN, that's wonderful!!!  PAULSDALE!

It just shows what women can do when they work together.  You are just amazing, all of you.  THANK YOU FOR SHARING THAT

I must repeat it, take a look!

www.alicepaul.org

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 06, 2009, 12:05:43 PM
'One wonders if these “rivals” of Lincoln, or Lincoln himself, had any idea of what lay ahead of them!' Ella, in post 44.

My thoughts exactly, and my intended  reply to your question in an earlier post:

'What are your thoughts on the chapter titled, The Lure of Politics? post 42

The rivals all seemed to go into politics in such a light-hearted way, considering the cataclysmic political events which lay ahead. Bates suddenly the center of attraction again at the Rivers and Harbors convention and glorying in it. Seward bored with  practicing law. Chase chasing fame and glory, with Lincoln right behind him.

Ah, American politics. Was it the War of Independence which brought this unique aspect of human nature into existence? That was the first great stimulis catalyst. And I don't think anyone not born into the mystic of the home of the brave and the land of the free can truly understand and feel the events of American history. But Goodwin's quote from Alexis de Tocqueville at the beginning of the chapter is very apt.

Goodwin is part of a trend among recent historians in emphasizing the politics of the Civil War. And that makes it very interesting indeed. I'm beginning to see the whole thing in a different light. Sure, I've always had a number of books around, but almost exclusively on the military aspect of the war. Sherman's Marching Through Georgia, for example. Or Samuel Carter's The Siege of Atlanta, 1864. Or Michael Shaara's The Killer Angels, about the four bloody days of Gettysburg.

Well, last night I watched the last two segments of  David Grubin's  six-part movie, Abraham and Mary Lincoln: A House Divided. Both national and domestic of course. What a moving drama. Particularly moving was hearing it said that Lincoln spent a lot of time reading his bible as the  historical events reached their denouement. Does all politics end in resigntion to divine will? Do politicians finally despair, and, down on their knees, ask, What have we wrought? When I took the videos from the library shelf I noticed next to them a new book with the provocative title: Did Lincoln and the Republican Party Create the Civil War, by Robert P. Broadwater.

Much more to say, but I'm being called to lunch.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 07, 2009, 07:53:53 AM
Jean, the Kansas-Nebraska Act is in Chapter 5, which comes in the next section.  I admire your ability to keep track of things with an audiobook.  I can't do that.

This brings up a question: are we going at the right speed?  Some of you are way ahead and some of you had trouble getting the book and haven't caught up yet, so maybe it averages out, but the schedule is flexible.  What do you think?

The next section moves more quickly and is easier to read than the first.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 07, 2009, 11:14:39 AM
WHERE IS EVERYONE?

HAS SPRING COME AND YOU ARE OUTSIDE WORKING?  IT'S NOT DANDELION TIME YET SO YOU CAN'T BE OUT DIGGING THEM  FOR SUPPER? 

Do you know I remember doing that as a child; the depression years?  We ate them, as I remember, with lots of vinegar and they were chewey.  I can't remember if I liked them or not.

ARE YOU STILL INTERESTED IN THE BOOK?
As Pat said, perhaps we are either going too slow or too fast, which is it?

Do let us know!

PLUNDER AND CONQUEST is the chapter for tomorrow, aptly named -  a "stimulis catalyst" as JONATHAN would have called it.   Has America ever done anything similar before or since?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 07, 2009, 11:21:10 AM
JONATHAN told us about a book intimating that Lincoln and the Republican Party started the Civil War.  Interesting and the book could be right!

What do you think started it? 

LURKERS!  THOSE WHO DON'T WANT TO READ THE BOOK, POST YOUR OPINIONS!

ALL OPINIONS WELCOME.  WE ARE AN OPEN FORUM!
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: kidsal on March 07, 2009, 12:54:31 PM
I'm reading, I'm reading!

One surprise in the reading was the strong bonding between men.  They formed almost intimate friendships.  Perhaps because at that time there weren't too many men with their education so they naturally formed closer relationships.

Have to be married to be a politician?  Probably.  We have had some bachelors run for president but apparently there is some suspicion as to why they haven't conformed to the norm.  It is the same now with the question about religion.  Although we have freedom of religion, it is doubtful that for the immediate future anyone could be president without having a Christian faith even though some of our first presidents did not.

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 07, 2009, 02:09:34 PM
Jonathan - thanks for the reminder about the Abraham and Mary movie. I'm going to look for that at the library.

We've gotten past the idea that a politician couldn't have been divorced and still be an  upstanding, moral person - of course, we've gotten past many morals issues of married politicians, haven't we? - it is interesting that only James Buchanan had never been married when he became president, and it is likely that many people who voted for him didn't even know that. There are some who have suggested that JB was gay. Some gay politicinas have succeeded and i think that will become less and less of a problem, but still be a major hurdle for a while yet................on the other hand, i didn't expect to see an African-American president in my life-time. Our younger population may bring more changes than we expect. ........................ Maybe we know TOO much about our politicians lives that has nothing to do w/ how good a leader they will be?...................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 07, 2009, 07:52:29 PM
I believe that most of us would want any of these four men to represent us.  They were decent, upstanding men committed to the laws of morality and decency.  They had the courage of their convictions, which was much easier to have in those days than it is today.  Today politicans answer to lobbyists, have pressure put on them by members of their own party, lie, cheat, steal and are more interested in lining their own pockets than looking out for their constituents. In New York we had a governor, Eliot Spitzer who was forced to resign in disgrace because of his proclivity for call girls.  If I am not mistaken he used public funds to fly to Washington where the ladies of his choice were located for these assignations.  We have had a president involved in a nasty sex scandal.  We have had newly appointed cabinet members who conveniently forgot to pay their income taxes.  If we as private citizens "forgot" we would be fined or arrested.  But these public servants get a slap on the wrist.  Under Harding's administration we had the Tea Pot Dome scandal whereby Harding's secretary of the Interior took bribes and leased oil fields controlled by the navy allowing oil magnates to control the nations' oil reserves.
These four men in the book stood fast in their concept of justice even if it meant going against prevailing opinion jeopardizing their political careers, or putting their life at risk.  Chase prevented a frenzied mob from tar and feathering the publisher of an anti-slavery newspaper.  A year later he argued against returning a slave who had taken refuge in Cincinnati's black community  He argued against the Fugitive Slave Law of 1793.  He opposed laws that denied free black children public school education while requiring their parents to pay school taxes.
Seward, who became governor of New York in the mid 1800's earned the enmity of the nativist Protestants by welcoming Irish and Catholic immigrants.  He especially earned the ire of the nativists by proposing school legislation that would be more welcome to Catholic children.  As a result of the  curriculum parents were reluctant to send their children to school.  He wanted to divert some of the public school money to support parochial schools where Catholic children could receive instruction from Catholic teachers.  He was accused of being "in league with the pope."  The nativists never forgave him.

Lincoln likened his politics to an "old woman's dance"- short and sweet.  He stood for three simple ideas, a national bank, a protective tariff, and a system for internal improvements.  Seward and Bates spoke of improving waterways.  As a state legislator Lincoln could bring about improvements, of roads, rivers and harbors and provide work for unemployed men in times of panics or downturns.  I believe Jackson also funded work projects.  And yet when Roosevelt came out with such plans for unemployment during the Great Depression there was a hue and cry.  Lincoln's ambition was to be the "Dewitt Clinton of Illinois."  Clinton had opened opportunities for New Yorkers and left a permanent imprint on his state when he persuaded the legislature to support the Erie Canal project.  In Lincoln's Illinois, which had a large number of Southerners by birth slaves were viewed as property.  The fugitive slave provision in the Constitution viewed slaves as property and as such escaped slaves had to be returned to their rightful owner.  However Lincoln was anti-slavery and made no bones about it.  "The institution of slavery is founded on both justice and bad policy...if slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong." These men were  what I would want as a politician.  They had integrity, compassion and concern for their constituents.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 07, 2009, 08:41:12 PM
Right on, Lucky!  That's a great summary.  They were all good and moral men.  I particularly like the picture of the tall, massive Chase, normally hesitant in his dealings with men, singlehandedly facing down a mob at the door of Franklin Hotel.  The experience was crucial for Chase, too, focusing his antislavery feelings.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 08, 2009, 09:18:29 AM
NEW QUESTIONS WILL BE PUT IN THE HEADING THIS MORNING FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION!

I'm going to be away for most of the day today, but may be back this evening.  Did everybody remember to reset their clocks?

Just one brief comment:  On page 120 , third paragraph near the bottom of the page, there is this:

"Announcing that Mexico had fired upon American soils on American soil, Polk called on Congress not to declare war but to recognize that a state of war already existed."

This surely is unique!!!!

War with Mexico began and our Goodwin says the American people "regarded the war as a 'romantic venture in a distant and exotic land.'

300,000 men volunteered to fight!

Lincoln was a Congressman and, as such, voted with others on a resolution that the war had been unconstitutional, but also stated that he had never voted against sending supplies to the soldiers.

I cannot find it in my book at the moment but out of this war came a number of new states in America.  Is it any wonder that today we still have troubles with Mexico?





 
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 08, 2009, 09:26:39 AM
Speaking of declaring war, put this into Google and you may (or may not) be surprised. 

"President Bush and Declaration of war with Iraq."
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 08, 2009, 12:16:01 PM
Ella and Pat ask, are we still interested in the book, are we going too slow or too fast?

Kidsal, jean, and lucky leave no doubt about their enthusiasm in their subsequent posts. I would like to add mine. The pace is just right for me. I'm totally engrossed in the subject matter. The great themes. The strong characters. The high stakes. And I'm intrigued by how Goodwin goes about crafting a retelling of this unique chapter in a nation's history. A War and Peace, American-style. Should we say War and Politics? That's the part that fascinates me. I would recommend the book to the rest of the world as an insight into what America is all about.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 08, 2009, 12:19:25 PM
The new questions for chapters 4-7 are up in the heading.

Remember, WE CAN STILL DISCUSS CHAPTERS 1-3.  There's plenty left to say, and there's no reason we can't have more than one conversation at a time.  The old questions are still at the top of page 1.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 08, 2009, 01:22:21 PM
I recently read two Don Coldsmith novels. The first one was "Tallgrass." It was about the Missouri/Kansas territories around the 1830's. In a second follow-up novel titled "South Wind" he talks about how difficult it was to live in Kansas and Iowa in the 1850's. On meeting strangers it was impossible to know whether they were for or against slavery and saying the wrong thing could start a fight, or worse yet, get your house attacked and your family murdered. It was a very tense time. The family moved from Kansas to Iowa hoping to be safer................i don't think that the Civil War could have been avoided. There were too many economic factors for slave-owners and over the decades people had hardened their opinion/emotions on both sides.

Question #4 re: Lincoln and Obams - unfortunately it looks like Pres Obama may have almost as big a problem - of keeping the country operating - as Lincoln, and everyday it looks more so. ................... people's emotions will become more and more a factor in their behaviors as they get more and more scared about what might happen. ...................... jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 08, 2009, 09:00:19 PM
Q 4. Parallels between Obama and Lincoln:

Some of them are obvious, besides the team that is the subject of the book. His ability to deal with those of differing opinions. His ability at oratory. In spite of the fact that we think of Lincoln as a tortured man, one of his contempraries commented on Lincolns air of calm and certainty.  I was startled when I learned of Lincoln's emphasis in Congress on repairing and developing infrastructure, and recognize that influence in Obama.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 09, 2009, 09:46:25 AM
LUCKY, thank you for your comments.  Gosh, I must quote a couple:

"These four men in the book stood fast in their concept of justice even if it meant going against prevailing opinion jeopardizing their political careers, or putting their life at risk.  They were decent, upstanding men committed to the laws of morality and decency.

That good, huh!  Politicians can be that good?  I'm too cynical, I guess!  But how nice to believe!   I think Goodwin is a bit quick to write "good" into some of the actions of the politicians of this period.  Other books would be more critical.

Thanks, JONATHAN, for that vote of confidence.  I, too, think the book is fascinating, a glimpse into the world of poliltics in 1800, Lincoln's world.  A conflicting period in American history. 

I agree with you, JEAN, that the Civil War could not have been avoided.  Somewhere in these chapters states started seceding from the Union, how could that have been avoided?   Jefferson was the principal advocate of states' rights and what problems we have had, as a country, because of such ideas (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States'_rights)!

As I understand it, because of the war with Mexico and all those new territories that America "plundered, " the Wilmot Proviso (see link in heading) became the latest confllict between the states.  It festered and festered.

Seward lived in a state that was more liberal than Lincoln's state of Illinois and, thus, he could become fiery in his speeches promoting the black vote, black presence on juries and black officeholding, while Lincoln was maintaining his opinion that such would never be the norm. 

Here we see the influence that their consitutuents have upon politicians and how they woo their favor.  See Lincoln's Cooper Union Speech that has been criticized harshly over the years.

On page 134 we read of Chase's pursuit of a career in his state legislature that was suspicious and haunted him for years. 

Of all of them, and I know very little about their political campaigns other than what we have read in book,  Bates of Missouri seems the most honest.

JEAN, and JOAN both mentioned the resemblance in the country's problems that Lincoln faced also. 

How history repeats itself!

Keeping the country operating, repairing infrasture!

I am amused when I read this statement:

"The principal weapon of political combatants (1850) was the speech.  A gift for oratory was the key to success in politics."

What has changed???

WHAT ARE YOUR OPINIONS?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 09, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
Question 2. Was the Civil War inevitable? I think it was. But I heard a talk the other day by someone (sorry, I forget his name) who studied the emancipation of slaves in the rest of the Americas. I hadn't known that in the same period, the same slavery question was being struggled with all over the Carabean, Central, and South America.

In most cases, it was acheived peacably, by compensating the slave-owners (i.e. buying their slaves from them). Here is another parallel with today: we are forced to solve a problem by giving money to the people who caused the problem.

Just as it makes us furious today, it made the Northerners furious when Lincoln proposed it. The difference was, the Southerners rejected it as well. I think the difference between the US and these other countries is that in other countries the slaveowners knmew they were a minority and couldn't win, while the US Southerners thought they could.

What do you all think?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 09, 2009, 10:10:13 PM
Nice points. JoanK.  It would be interesting to know the numbers--if the percentage of slaves was as high in those countries as in the US.

"I think the difference between the US and these other countries is that in other countries the slaveowners knew they were a minority and couldn't win, while the US Southerners thought they could."

Lincoln, speaking to Kentuckians in Cincinnati, said:
"Will you make war upon us and kill us all?  Why, gentlemen, I think you are as gallant and as brave men as live:that you can fight as bravely in a good cause, man for man, as any other people living...but, man for man, you are  not better than we are, and there are not so many of you as there are of us.  You will never make much of a hand at whipping us....being inferior in numbers, you will make nothing by attempting to master us"  (Goodwin, p. 225)

too bad nobody listened.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 10, 2009, 12:34:05 PM
A love/hate relationship between Mexican - Americans and tueh United States has existed since the Mexican American war.  There is the feeling that the territory was stolen and in truth one must say that it was.  Of course all this was done under the guise of patriotism.  The meddling of the United States in the affairs of Mexico, particularly under the administration of Wilson earned the enmity of the people and perhaps the amused gratitude of the canine population as "Wilson" became a popular name for dogs. 
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 10, 2009, 12:40:34 PM
I was cut off and so I am continuing my post.  The Mexican American War was the first majopr conflict driven by the idea of "
Manifest Destiny", the belief that America had a God given right, or destiny to expand the country's borders.  The war had two basic causes.  First, the desire of teh U.S. to expand across the North AMerican continent to the Pacitic Ocean caused conflict with all of tis neighbors' from the British in Canada and Oregon to the Mexicans in the southwest.  By the time President Polk came to office in 1845 an idea called "Manifest Destiny" had taken root among the American people, and the new occupant of the White HOuse was a firm believer in the idea of expansion.  The belief that the united States basically had a God given right to occupy and "civilize" the whole ocntinent gained favor as more and more Americans settled the western lands.  It did not necessarliy mean violent expansion.  In both 1835 and 1845 the United States offered to purchase California from Mexico, for 5 million and 25 million dollars respectively.  The Mexican government refused the opportunity to sell half of its country to Mexico's most dangeorus neighbor.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 10, 2009, 12:44:12 PM
The computer keeps throwing me off.  I apologize for typos but because something has gone wrong here I have not been able to make corrections.  I shall try to continue.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 10, 2009, 12:59:03 PM
It would appear that Mexican-Americans have a love/hate relationship with the United States because of the Mexican American war.  There is the feeling that the territory was stolen and  in truth one must say that it was.  Of course all this was done under the guise of patriotism.  The meddling of the United States in the affairs of Mexico, particularly under the administration of Wilson earned the enmity of the people and perhaps the amused gratitude of the canine population as “Wilson” became a popular name for dogs.  This I found to be very funny.
   The Mexican American War was the first major conflict driven by the idea of “Manifest Destiny”, the belief that America had a God given right, or destiny, to expand the country’s borders.  The war had two basic causes.  First, the desire of the U.S. to expand across the North American continent to the Pacific Ocean caused conflict with all of its neighbors’ from the British in Canada and Oregon to the Mexicans in the southwest.  By the time President Polk came to office in l845 an idea called “Manifest Destiny” had taken root among the American people, and the new occupant of the White House was a firm believer in the idea of expansion.  The belief that the United States basically had a God given right to occupy and “civilize” the whole continent gained favor as more and more Americans settled the western lands.  It did  not necessarily mean violent expansion.  In both l835 and l845 the United States offered to purchase California from Mexico, for $5 million and $25 million, respectively. The Mexican government refused the opportunity to sell half of its country to Mexico’s most dangerous neighbor.
   The second basic cause of the war was the Texas War of Independence and the subsequent annexation of that area to the United States.  Not all American westward migration was unwelcome.  In the l820’s and l830’s Mexico, newly independent from Spain, needed settlers in the under-populated northern parts of the country. An invitation was issued for people who would take an oath of allegiance of Mexico and convert to  Catholicism, the state region.  Thousand of Americans took up the offer and moved, often with slaves to the Mexican province of Texas.  Soon however many of the new “Texicans” or Texians” were unhappy with the way the government in Mexico City tried to run the province.  In l835 Texas revolted, and after several bloody battles, the Mexican President, Santa Anna, was forced  to sign the Treaty of Velasco in l836.  This treaty gave Texas its independence, but many Mexicans refused to accept the legality of this document.  There were frequent border conflicts between Mexico and the United States.  Many in the United States sympathized with the U. S. born Texans in this conflict.  Because of the savage frontier fighting, the American public developed as very negative stereotype against the Mexican people and government.  Because of the continued hostilities with Mexico, Texas decided to join the United States and on July 4, l845, the annexation gained approval from the U. S. Congress.  Mexico was not happy with the province becoming an American state, and the border conflict now became a major international issue.  Texas, and now the United States, claimed the border at the Rio Grande River.  Mexico claimed territory as far north as the Nueces River.  Both nation sent troops to enforce the competing claims and a tense standoff followed. By l846 the war had begun.
   In l848 the Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo was signed.  It called for the annexation of the northern areas of Mexico to the United States.  In return, the U. S. agreed to pay $15 million to Mexico as compensation for the seized territory.  The United States acquired the northern half of Mexico. This area later became the states of California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah. Relations between the United State sand Mexico remained tense for many decades  with several military encounters along the border.  For the United States the war provided a training ground for the men who would lead the Northern and southern armies in the upcoming American Civil War.
   One interesting aspect of the war involves the fate of U. S. Army deserters of Irish origin who joined the Mexican Army as the Saint Patrick’s Battalion.  This group of Catholic Irish immigrants rebelled at the abusive treatment by Protestant, American born officers and at the treatment of the Catholic Mexican population by the U. S. Army.  Catholics at the time were an unwelcome minority and the Irish were an unwelcome ethnic group.  In September l847 the U. S. Army hanged sixteen surviving members of the Saint Patrick’s Brigade as traitors.  To this day they are considered heroes in Mexico.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 10, 2009, 02:36:15 PM
Lucky, that's a great summary.  It's particularly helpful because Goodwin says almost nothing about the war or the conflict leading up to it.  This helps put the little she does say in context; I can see both why some people thought it was wrong and why there was so much popular enthusiasm for it.

I can't wish now that our country had different boundaries, but I'm glad I don't have to defend the way we got there.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 10, 2009, 02:45:56 PM
Interesting, how people make an idea "God's decision" when they want to justify something w/out thinking about it too much. "Manifest" destiny!! For the last 1000 years Europeans/Christians (western civilization) and their descendents have tho't they had all the RIGHT answers about society. Have we continued that assumption and just now call it "democratization?" We will bring democracy to everyone! We are soooo superior and we should bring our superiority to everyone, whether they want it or not! Or whether the society is ready for it or not - and then, we get upset when they don't elect the people we want them to elect - think Gaza!..............democracy is only the right idea when it gives us the "right" solutions. Democracy is a radical political theory, the people get to speak - and sometimes are out of control! TIC

 On the other hand, thruout the last 150 years we have been upset when "too many" of the "wrong" people decide they want to come to the U.S. and have some of what we have! Are we a confused and complex society? Makes us and our history very interesting.

One of the reasons the Civil War was inevitable and slavery was not going to disappear was because of the territoriy that opened up for cultivation and therefore slavery after the Mex/Am'n war. If we had stayed a country primarily to the east of the Mississippi, having slaves may have become less appealing, but w/ the opportunity to own LARGE areas of land, needing a large labor force made the idea of using slaves very profitable and appealing. That is one of the great "what if.......?" questions in history.

There was also the question of  political control in the new territories. Were we going to have more slave-states, or more non-slave-states in our federal gov't? The idea of control became even bigger than the idea of slavery itself. I'm sure you all had discussions in your high school history classes about "states rights." You may have even been taught -especially if you were in a southern state - that the Civil War was all about states rights. So, the spin was that the war is about the states vs the federal gov't - not about that unspeakable issue of slavery.

I'm sounding very cynical in this post, but in actuality, their was a lot of "spin" in our history and whether we got it at the time, or not, their was a lot of spin in the history we were taught, especially in our public school teachings...............

(Are you reading about the presidential convention yet?)...............................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 10, 2009, 04:44:59 PM
The description of the Mexican war was very interesting! Having lived most of my life on the Eastern seaboard, I think of American history (and the Civil War) in terms of what happened there. Moving to California, I get a completely different history of Spanish exploration, 49ers etc. Now I realize that Texas had another history that I was unfamiliar with. What a large, complex, and interesting country we have.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 10, 2009, 05:35:54 PM

There was also the question of  political control in the new territories. Were we going to have more slave-states, or more non-slave-states in our federal gov't? The idea of control became even bigger than the idea of slavery itself. I'm sure you all had discussions in your high school history classes about "states rights." You may have even been taught -especially if you were in a southern state - that the Civil War was all about states rights. So, the spin was that the war is about the states vs the federal gov't - not about that unspeakable issue of slavery.

(Are you reading about the presidential convention yet?)...............................jean

Yes, you can say the war was about states rights, but would states rights have been such an issue except for the slavery question?

This week's section took us up to the eve of the convention.  Next week in Chapter 8 we'll go to Chicago, and continue up to the eve of the Inauguration at the end of Chapter 11.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 10, 2009, 07:51:43 PM
Thanks Pat, my audio book doesn't tell me which chapter i'm on...............

Have you seen the two Lincoln news items today? Some one found a picture in a Grant scrapebook that they think is L in front of the White House, if so it's the last picture taken of him before the assassination.............also, L had a watch that has been carefully opened by a jeweler because it supposedly had a msg in it from the maker of the watch about the Civil War and sure enough, there it was..........jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 11, 2009, 10:44:35 AM
JONATHAN commented a post or so ago that the subject of our discussion should be “WAR AND POLITICS.”  Yes, Yes.  This book is about politicians and their arguments, lives, and loves.  What fascinating chapters these three are and we look deeper into the hearts of our four leading men as they grapple with the problems of their day.

JOAN, what an interesting answer you gave to the question of  the inevitability of the Civil War.  Thank you.  Gives me something to think about all day.  And also the parallel between the slaveholders and the bank officials, albeit the difference in my opinion being that the slaveholders needed their slaves for economic reasons, whereas the banks were just greedy.  Am I wrong?   It has been speculated by many that the economy that demanded slavery would in time disintegrate and the whole ugly business would disappear.  Machinery, for one thing, would in time replace manpower and the upkeep of the slaves was forever a burden on their owners.

There are other economic forces at work that in time would prove that slavery was a business that would disappear without a war, but at the moment I cannot think of them.

WHO CAN TELL US OTHER REASONS?



HELLO, PAT!  What gave the Southerners such confidence?   This book is about Northern men, Northern politicians and gives us scant insight into the southern Congressmen, the politicians of the South, the newspapers there, the attitudes.  Perhaps we should read and discuss a book about the Confederate States and their leaders.  Perhaps someone has? 

Do tell us!

Keep talking LUCKY!!  What  you say is so VERY INTERESTING!  Do you think that if Mexico had not involved religion into their citizenship the outcome might have been different?   Today, Article I of the Constitution of Mexico states” 

“This article states that every individual in Mexico (official name, Estados Unidos Mexicanos or United Mexican States) has the rights that the Constitution gives. These rights cannot be denied and they cannot be suspended. Slavery is illegal in Mexico; any slaves from abroad who enter national territory will, by this mere act, be freed and given the full protection of the law. All types of discrimination whether it be for ethnic origin, national origin, gender, age, different capacities, social condition, health condition, religion, opinions, preferences, or civil state or any other which attacks human dignity and has as an objective to destroy the rights and liberties of the people are forbidden.”

--------------------------------------------------

It all provided so much material for many movies and documentaries .  I have seen so many over the years.  I wish our friend, HAROLD, could be with us but for health reasons he is at the moment unable to join us.  He lives in Texas and knows his history of the territory very well!

JEAN, I sense the same -  ”We are soooo superior and we should bring our superiority to everyone, whether they want it or not!”   Can we stop this attitude?  We hear that other nations are beginning, or do, regard us suspiciously, is this why?

No, I never was taught that the Civil War was about “states rights” possibly because I have always lived in the North?  I do know I had an excellent history teacher in high school that has always been the motivation for my love of the subject.  When studying the Civil War she divided the class into halves, the North and the South, and we debated the issues.  We were graded on our answers we gave to the questions she asked each side.  I was also a member of the debate team which helped!

Wouldn’t it be interesting to questions students today in high schools from both northern and southern high schools!






Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 11, 2009, 11:09:11 AM
Hello JEAN.  I didn't know of the "watch" that has been discovered, but I read of the photo of Lincoln.  So many descriptions of Lincoln!  A young patent attorney met him for the first time: "tall, rawly boned, ungainly back woodsman, with coarse, ill-fitting clothing, his trousers hardly reaching his andles, holding in his hands a blue cotton unbrella with a ball on the handle." (pg.174)

And Stanton, whom Lincoln named Secretary of War when he became president, called him a "long armed Ape who does not know any thing and can do you no good."





Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 11, 2009, 11:11:14 AM
Every description you read of Lincoln describes him in coarse and ill-fitting clothes.  Why didn't Mary, who spent hundreds of dollars on her own clothes, see to it that her husband, the senator, and later president, be better clothed?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 11, 2009, 06:22:27 PM
This morning's Washington Post had the story of Lincoln's watch.  In 1861, Lincoln left his watch at M. W. Galt Jewelers to be repaired.  Jonathan Dillon was working on the watch when the shop owner came in with the news that Fort Sumter had been fired on.  At this point, Dillon said, he etched his name, the date, and a patriotic message inside the watch.  This was family legend, and Dillon also told a New York Times reporter in 1906, a year before he died.  The watch stayed in the family until 1958, when Lincoln's great-great-grandson donated it to the Smithsonian.  The legend never caught up with the watch until last month, when a relative in Ireland ran across a letter from Dillon, found the NYT article on the Internet, and alerted the Smithsonian.

Yesterday a jeweler opened the watch and discovered "Jonathan Dillon April 13-1861.  Fort Sumpter was attacked by the rebels on the above date thank God we have a government" etched inside.

Galt jeweler's was still a fixture in DC until about 10(?) years ago--very elegant and dignified.  My wedding ring came from there.  Maybe I'd better examine it for graffiti.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 11, 2009, 06:24:21 PM
Every description you read of Lincoln describes him in coarse and ill-fitting clothes.  Why didn't Mary, who spent hundreds of dollars on her own clothes, see to it that her husband, the senator, and later president, be better clothed?
That's a good question.  Some people have the knack of looking ill-dressed no matter what.  Maybe Lincoln was one of them.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 11, 2009, 06:34:31 PM
On page 125, Lincoln makes reference to Haman.  I find that remark very interesting.  It attests to Lincoln’s voracious reading and his extensive knowledge of the Old Testament, for the name Haman is not that well known outside of Jewish history.  The book of Esther tells of the proposed destruction of the Jews of Persia by Haman.  He especially despised one of the king’s advisors, a Jew named Mordecai and had the gallows erected for him.  Queen Esther informed the king of the evil intentions of Haman, and the gallows Haman had erected for Mordecai turned out to be the source of his own death.  By using this comparison Lincoln is telling us that the Democratic “thunder” has worked against them and like Haman’s gallows” that they built for us ...they are doomed to hang themselves.”  A very eloquent comparison.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 11, 2009, 06:41:46 PM
   Politicians do not always express the truth or sincerity in their opinions.  Salman Chase remarked to Gerrit Smith (who was an abolitionist) that he would not have engaged in the war.   (The Mexican –American War) but publicly he was reticent.  If he wanted to be elected a senator, he needed the sympathy of Ohio democrats who were pro war.   When it comes to politics truth is a dangerous commodity.  Justin Butterfield, a prominent politician remarked, “I opposed one war, the War of 1812.  That was enough for me. I am now perpetually in favor or war, pestilence and famines.”  What a great line.
   Although Seward was not in favor of the war it was better to be discrete.  “It was” he said, “a mistake to argue against tit.
   Bates and Lincoln however expressed their vehemence against the war.  Bates charged Polk with “gross and palpable lying”.  The true object of the war, he remarked was for “plunder and conquest.”  Can we not apply these same words to the Iraqi war which, I believe is now in its eighth year.  Telling the truth in politics can often destroy a politician’s career or block important legislation.  A congressman or senator is dependent on others for approval to get a bill through. 
In l937 a Michigan representative read the press accounts of a grisly lynching in Mississippi.  It was but the latest in a series of lynching that had claimed over one hundred victims since l930.  Three days later the House approved an anti-lynching bill.  For Southerners it revived fear of Reconstruction.  Roosevelt, who believed in the measure but could not readily support it, remarked,  "I’ve got to get legislation passed by Congress to save America.”  The Dixicrats threatened to vote against such measures if the bill went through.  “The Southerners”, said Roosevelt, “are chairmen or occupy strategic places on most Senate and House committees.  If I come out for the anti-lynching bill now, they will block every bill I ask congress to pass to keep America from collapsing.  I just can’t take the risk” (“Freedom From Fear,” David Kennedy, p.343).    Politics does indeed make for strange bedfellows.                               
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 11, 2009, 07:53:40 PM
The Book Club Online  is  the oldest  continuing book club on the Internet, begun in 1996, open to everyone.  We offer cordial discussions of one book a month,  24/7 and  enjoy the company of readers from all over the world.  Everyone is welcome to join in.

Team of Rivals
by
Doris Kearns Goodwin

(http://seniorlearn.org/bookclubs/teamofrivals/teamcvr.jpg)                         

"More books about Abraham Lincoln line the shelves of libraries than about any other American. Can there be anything new to say about our 16th president? Surprisingly, the answer is yes. - ..... Doris Kearns Goodwin has written an elegant, incisive study of Lincoln......." - New York Times

The Team:
William H. Seward
Salmon P. Chase
Edward Bates
.........     Links:
NPR Review (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4989622)
Wilmot Proviso (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilmot_Proviso)
Dred Scott Decision (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford)
Kansas-Nebraska Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas-Nebraska_Act)
Fugitive Slave Law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Slave_Law_of_1850)
March 15 -Chapters 8-11
March 22 - Chapters 12-15
.........March 29 - Chapters 16-19
April 5 -      Chapters 20-23
April 12 -    Chapters 24 -26

To Consider in Chapters 8-11

1.  Why Chicago for the Republican convention of 1860? 

2.  The Republicans gathered  to nominate their candidate  for the presidency of the United States.    What actions did Lincoln take to win the nomination?  Was it his leadership, publicity, friends, managers, committees, what plans were used?

3.  Do you see indications that Obama used some of the same strategies that Lincoln used for the nomination? 

4. Consider the reaction of the Southern politicians.  Why did the Democratic Convention in Charleston, S. Carolina end in chaos? 

5.  What effect did the Democrats’ nomination of Douglas have upon the eventual election of the president, if any?

6.  Newspapers played a major role in the opinion of the people and the election of politicians in the 18th and 19th centuries and beyond.   Do newspapers, or the printed word, have any future today?

7.  Seven states unanimously decided to secede from the union upon Lincoln’s election.  Consider their grievances against the Union and consider why the North was taken by surprise!.

8.What was Lincoln’s own view of a slave?  Had he had any personal experience with slavery?

9. Was there any possible way that the war could have been avoided in your opinion? 
 

Discussion Leaders:
Ella (egibbons28@columbus.rr.com) & PatH (rjhighet@earthlink.net)
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 11, 2009, 07:54:46 PM
On page 125, Lincoln makes reference to Haman.  I find that remark very interesting.  It attests to Lincoln’s voracious reading and his extensive knowledge of the Old Testament, for the name Haman is not that well known outside of Jewish history.

I'll bet that this is an example of the good side of the scarcity of books when Lincoln was growing up.  When you have very few books, you read them over and over, and milk them for all they are worth--get a totally deeper understanding of them.  Though he didn't have a lot of books, Lincoln had some very good ones, of course including the Bible, and he made the most of them.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 11, 2009, 07:57:43 PM
Interesting points, Lucky. Jews celebrate the story of Haman on Purin, when they eat cookies called "Hamen's ears".

The story of having to keep quiet about your beliefs is an old one. In 37, the Congress worked by a strict seniority system. The positions of power went to those who had been Senators or Congressmen the longest. Since the South always voted Democratic, Southern Congressmen held the same position forever, and moved into positions of power. This kept the Congress incredibly slow on issues of racial justice or equality.

States Rights: the devision of power between the states and the Federal government has been an issue of contention since the revolution. Just after the revolution, Americans thought of themselves as citezens of their states, and were slow to cede any power to the Federal Government. Eighty years later, I'm sure many people still felt very strongly about this. Many Southern slaveholders of course didn't want to lose their slaves, but also didn't think a bunch of people from other states should be able to tell them what to do.

To a Northerner, since states right have been raised first to defend slavery and later to oppose Civil Rights legislation, it has come to be thought of mainly as a support for racial inequality. But of course, it is much wider than that. We still have state laws controlling marraige, divorce, and many other things. The state of California has stronger pollution laws than other, but the pollution drifts from state to state. Some states recognize gay marraige, some don't etc.

What do you think of all this?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 12, 2009, 09:12:18 AM
Hi Joan,

You bring up a good point.  The Constitution is the supreme law of the United States yet states, like recalcitrant children have been stubborn when it comes to obeying it.  Today, the most egregious example is the controversy over abortion.  Abortion is legal according to the Constitution yet many states have made it so difficult for women to avail themselves of it that its is almost illegal.  A case in point was the referendum held by South Dakota to outlaw it.  It failed, but even if it had passed, eventually the Supreme Curt would have ruled against it.  The state of Massachusetts refused to allow the sale of birth control pills.  Women had to have their prescription filled in Conn.  The Supreme Court eventually ruled against this.  I sometimes think we have too much government.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 12, 2009, 12:23:31 PM
The more I read, both the posts and the book, the more perplexing it gets. The Civil War with its causes and its consequences, seen both as nation-building and nation destroying. What a curse slavery turned out to be. What  bones of contention lie hidden in the Constitution. Sure, it's the supreme law of the land. But then it falls into the hands of someone like CJ Taney and the dreadful Dred Scott decision is made part of the march to war.

Was the Civil War inevitable? Only for those who wanted it. Lincoln did not. He wasn't a crusader like Seward and Chase. Lincoln did not set out to be the Great Emancipator. His hero was Henry Clay, the Great Pacificator. Of course Lincoln was aware of the slavery issue, but his main course of action seems to have been to find the answers in the constitution. Well, perhaps with a little Old Testament guidance thrown in.

Seward, on the other hand, talked about the 'higher law', and the irrepressible conflict'. We're given to believe that this lost him support in his race for the nomination. Being an out and out abolitionist lost him as many votes as it got him. Who can blame him? After all he and his wife Frances had witnessed the cruelties of slavery at first hand in their journey through Virginia. I've forgotten the page.

I've fallen a little behind in my reading because of several distractions, but I'm following the discussion with much interest. I wonder how much 'Galt' jewellery is being torn apart, like fortune cookies, on the expectation of finding the musings of a repairman. Is it true that no photograph exists which has both Mary and Abraham Lincoln on it? Surely there must be one out there.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 12, 2009, 02:16:15 PM
I must admit that my attitude toward state's rights varies a bit according to the issue.  I'm very indignant when South Dakota tries to outlaw abortion, but I'm secretly sympathetic when California tries to put on pressure with stronger antipollution laws.

"What  bones of contention lie hidden in the Constitution."  Right, Jonathan, but I'm surprised at how sturdy the Constitution has proven to be.  It still works pretty well in a time when all the issues and the way the world works are very different from when it was written.  Politics is always a tug of war.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 12, 2009, 02:44:52 PM
March is Women's History Month.

Just last night i had a wonderful experience in women's history. Women's Way in Philadelphia, which is a "United Way" for women's agencies and issues, gives an award each year to the author of a book which advances the dialogue about women's rights. It's given in the name of Ernesta Drinker Ballard who was the first president of Women's Way. W'sW was started in the 70's when the United Way of Phila was giving very little money to women's agencies and projects. Ballard was a dynamo for women in PHila, in many areas of life. Of course, both the Drinker and the Ballard name is historic in Phila.

The winner of the award last night was Laurel Thatcher Ulrich, the author of sev'l books about colonial women, but is most famous for putting a phrase in a journal article in the 1970's about colonial women's funerals that said "well-behaved women seldom make history!" That phrase has been picked up and used on every surface - t-shirts, mugs, pens, banners, etc. etc. and is the title of her latest book.  This book focuses on Christine de Pisan, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Virginia Woolf, but goes on to chapters entitled "Shakespeare's Daughters," the Amazons," Slaves in the Attic," and others. She is really talking about all of us ordinary women who "make" history w/out ever having our names in history books. Gerda Learner has said everyone is making history. Do you think she's right?

We've talked about how many books have been written about Lincoln and many of them mention the effects that the women in his life  had on him.
Those women would probably have never come to our attention except for their link to AL, and yet, they are symbols of millions of women's lives and they all had an impact on their time and place, and where we are in history now. Which brings me back to Ella's question about the similarities btwn Pres Obama and AL. Women seemed to have had a strong influence in Obama's life. I will be curious to see if there are any comments ABOUT women from Lincoln in DKG's book. What was his attitude toward them.........................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 12, 2009, 03:56:50 PM
Hello, JOAN, you made a very astute comment in Post #81 about southern congressmen and also about states rights.   Would you agree that as far as senators go we see the same old system, the same senators from the same states?  Obviously they are bringing in money for their constituents, loads of earmarks.   I watch the news and see some faces that I’m sure have been there for 30 some years or more.  One recent example is Ted Kennedy even if he is well regarded. I remember him as a very young man on that bridge.

The states believed that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution gave them the right to secede, the right to go to war, the right to be independent.  See:

http://thomaslegion.net/secessionofsouthernstatesandtheamericancivilwar.html

So, their state House of Representative and their Senate vote on it?  I wonder if there were many dissenting votes, anyone know?

That article says that even today the subject of Secession is a very heated one.  I would love to hear that debate. 

As is states rights on other subjects that LUCKY AND PAT both remarked about.

But as I want about my work today, I thought about the many  “ifs” connected to this war and as I was on the Web I looked up Robert E. Lee.  Perhaps if he taken command of the Union Army as Lincoln requested, things might have been different? 

So many interesting comments all of you have made.  Come more often, JONATHAN, don’t get distracted, spend a pleasant hour with the book and us.  We appreciate your comments, so well thought out.

How interesting, JEAN, I have never heard of Women’s Way, but we can use all the help we get.  I’m not sure that this book is a good example of Lincoln’s attitude toward women, what do the rest of you think?  He was such a political animal (as Obama seems to be), but he loved his children dearly and spent time with them.  Mary seemed to me to be a “plague” (for lack of a better word) as far as Lincoln was concerned, but perhaps I am wrong.

We read (pgs.124-5) from letters he wrote to Mary.  He mentions her headaches, her hindrance of his business,  her problems with other folks, but Goodwin states that the letters were also full of expressions of longing, both for her company and perhaps, intimacy.

Michelle Obama, living in a period of history where women of her education and prominence, can just about choose what she wishes to do.  She could probably have a great impact on anything she wishes to engage in; I think she has mentioned working with people in the District to better their lives. 

I am thinking -- thinking -- of other presidents' wives; one stands out, Ladybird Johnson, and her beautification program for the country.  It was a great improvement I thought and it was successful.  Do you know that our downtown Columbus, Ohio does not allow billboards anywhere, in fact we see very few billboards anywhere.  Do you?

What do you think?


Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 13, 2009, 10:02:41 AM
I will be curious to see if there are any comments ABOUT women from Lincoln in DKG's book. What was his attitude toward them.........................jean

Lincoln seems to have been attracted to educated, intelligent women, which suggests he wanted them to be his equals, but Goodwin says little or nothing about his attitude.

Seward and Chase were also attracted to intelligent women; no mention is made of Bates' attitude.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 13, 2009, 10:22:43 AM
Goodwin only has a few sentences about the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, so I’ll say a little about it.  It was passed by the Congress of the Confederation of the United States, and dealt with setting up the organization of the Northwest Territory (now Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and a bit of Minnesota) and the admission of the territory into the  Union as a number of new states.  The important part for our story is that it forbade slavery in the territory.

This was the foundation of the antislavery argument against the expansion of slavery, that the founding fathers recognized their inability to do away with slavery as it already existed, but had no intention of letting it spread.

"To many opponents of slavery in later years, including Abraham Lincoln, the Ordinance of 1787 became…a sacred document expressing the intent of the founding fathers to confine slavery within the boundaries of the existing states, Prohibiting forever its future spread."  Goodwin, p 110.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Ordinance

This argument was at the heart of Lincoln’s Cooper Union Speech.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 13, 2009, 03:33:42 PM
Yes, dealing with the question of whether, if slavery was kept from expanding, it would have died away?

In addition to reasons mentioned above, there is the relationship between slavery and mechanization. The accepted wisdom is that one couldn't use slaves to operate expensive machinery, because it would be too easy for them to sabotage them. They were economically important then for picking cotton and tobacco. but I'll bet the planters did just as well with the system of sharecropping that evolved after the Civil War.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 13, 2009, 04:55:56 PM
I don't know if i'm ahead or behind the book, so let me just make some comments relating to the convention. If i'm ahead of you, i'll repeat these later:

I was astonished that 40,000 people came to the convention. Railroads had expanded across the country and i'm sure that is why so many were able to come. And, as was typical at the time, women were relegated to the side galleries, ironically, making men find a woman to accompany HIM to get a seat in the galleries. 10,000 people were in the convention hall. My question has always been when i read about big crowds and speech-makers before there was electricity - how do they hear what is going on on the stage, or from the floor?

It's been a while since "German-Americans" were considered as a voting block. That bought a smile to my face, remembering Ben Franklin's comment at one time that G-A'ns were a brutish, discourteous group. I'm not sure of the exact quote, but that was the essence of it.

There is a wonderful "what if..........." historical moment - if there was no Horace Greeley who held a grudge about Seward, there may have been no Pres Lincoln. It was frustrating for me that Goodwin doesn't tell us what  "political slights" had ticked off Greeley............is there a footnote in the book that tells us? ......................
I think i must still be in the first chapters on the dvd, or maybe the dvd is abridged, altho it doesn't say so.............Richard Thomas - yes, "johnboy," is the reader on the dvd and he's quite good...................easy to listen to.............................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 13, 2009, 05:18:34 PM
BF's comments about German-American's........does this sound familiar? Pat Buchanan could very easily have put his name on this.  :P

Franklin warned that Germans were too stupid to learn English, and therefore represented a political threat to America:

"Those who come hither are generally of the most ignorant Stupid Sort of their own Nation…and as few of the English understand the German Language, and so cannot address them either from the Press or Pulpit, ’tis almost impossible to remove any prejudices they once entertain…Not being used to Liberty, they know not how to make a modest use of it…...In short unless the stream of their importation could be turned from this (Penna) to other colonies, as you very judiciously propose, they will soon so out number us, that all the advantages we have will not in My Opinion be able to preserve our language, and even our Government will become precarious."

The other objection that Ben Franklin had to German immigrants was their "swarthy complexion", which was an affront to the "purely white people" who originally settled America:

"Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the   English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as   to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our   Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion". 

The more things change, the more they stay the same!?! ................

In the discussion about the convention debate, DKG speaks of the "bluff W.E.B. DuBois" - that is not THE W.E.B.BuBois, writer, sociologist, founder of NAACP, he was not born yet. His father was a white man from NY whose name was James, so it may have been another man of his family.........................does DKG footnote that, or comment about it? If she doesn't, i'm surprised that she leaves many w/ the impression that it was the later DuBois...............................jean

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 13, 2009, 06:24:59 PM

There is a wonderful "what if..........." historical moment - if there was no Horace Greeley who held a grudge about Seward, there may have been no Pres Lincoln. It was frustrating for me that Goodwin doesn't tell us what  "political slights" had ticked off Greeley............is there a footnote in the book that tells us? ......................


Goodwin does tell us what ticked off Greeley.  Over the years, Greeley had been extremely useful to Seward and Weed through his newspaper, but Greeley also had a hankering for the prestige and money of political office.  At various times he had hinted this to Seward and Weed, but wasn't taken seriously (S and W felt he was more useful through his writing).  Finally, Greeley repeatedly asked to be the candidate for Governor.  Weed not only didn't support this, but gave the nomination for lieutenant governor to the editor of the New York Times, archrival of Greeley's N. Y. tribune.  S and W didn't take Greeley's extremely angry letter seriously enough, even when G began to support Bates.  (See pp 214-16.)

This is one of several mistakes of judgement or overconfidence made by Seward.  Another was his lengthy trip abroad when he should have been mending fences, and another was Weed's failure to meet with Pennsylvania's Boss Cameron when C. suggested it, leading to their not knowing what Cameron could or couldn't do.

This week's section stops just before the trains start rolling into Chicago.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 13, 2009, 06:53:55 PM
So the "swarthy, stupid" Germans wouldn't be able to adapt to democracy, but in 1900 they were joining the original English stock to try to keep out my father's parents ("swarthy, stupid" Italians) and it still continues.  That's one of the issues common to Lincoln's time and Obama's.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 13, 2009, 08:13:38 PM
thank you Pat, apparently the dvd IS an abridged version of the book, so i'll just pay attention to everyone's comments here and use the dvd as supplemental............jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 13, 2009, 08:42:05 PM
I had a bad experience with an abridged book as a child which put me off them forever.  I had gotten "Les Miserables" (in English of course) out of the library, started reading it on a Saturday morning, and read straight through until I finished it (probably sometime Sunday).  Then my father told me of a bit that was memorable to him, and I realized it wasn't in what I had read.  I looked, saw my book was abridged, and was absolutely furious.  I would have been willing to take the extra time to read the whole thing, but I knew I wouldn't go back and reread it now--still haven't reread it.

That made me really vigilant about abridgements, even though no doubt they are sometimes a good idea.

The bit about Greeley is only a page--it might have slipped by you.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 13, 2009, 09:20:52 PM
Yes, PAT, we have said very little  about Lincoln’s Cooper Union Speech, which launched him into the candidacy of the presidency,  just as we have said very little about all those acts, provisos, laws that were enacted during this period.  (Llinks above)  Weren’t they all (with the exception of the Dred Scott decision which is a discussion in itself) compromises in the problem of allowing states to enter the union either as a slave state or a free state..?

"LET US HAVE FAITH THAT RIGHT MAKES MIGHT, AND IN THAT FAITH, LET US, TO THE END, DARE TO DO OUR DUTY AS WE UNDERSTAND IT." - Abraham Lincoln

 Even though those words are repeated in schools, by politicians, historians, etc.,  to me, they sound as if they are a challenge?  Do they to the rest of you?

What do you think?  MIGHT - DUTY- TO THE END.    See the whole speech here:

 http://www.mrlincolnandnewyork.org/inside.asp?ID=15&subjectID=2

What did you think of the "snake metaphor" Lincoln used to illustrate his views:  See page 233

JOAN mentions mechanization soon to be employed for farmers.  What I wonder is why the South ever thought they could win in a war with the industrialized North?  Surely some of them knew that the South mainly depended on crops, exports,  and slave labor.  I know that Congressmen from the South must have realized that and other folks, people such as Robert E. Lee.  I’m not sure where in this book, or if it is in the book, but all the North had to do was to blockade the ports of the South and they were without means to buy anything or do anything!  Most of the railroads built or being built were in the North and extending in the  West.  And industries to make guns, bullets, uniforms, all the accouterments of war.

GOSH, DO I AGREE, JEAN!  "The more things change, the more they stay the same!?! ................

Later, ella




Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 14, 2009, 01:44:12 PM
Frances Seward is a very interesting character.  She was highly intelligent, and influenced her husband considerably, critiquing his speeches and, with her highly developed moral sense and passionate hatred of slavery, urging him to more extreme anti-slavery positions.

As time went on, she became more incapacitated by a series of nervous disorders.  She herself made an insightful diagnosis, that the nervous afflictions of so many women were the result of the frustrations of an educated woman's life.  In an unpublished essay:

"'To share in any kind of household work is to demean herself, and she would be thought mad to run, leap, or engage in active sports.'  She could dance all night, but it 'would be deemed unwomanly' and 'imprudent' for her to race with her children....Reflecting on 'the number of invalids that exist among women exempted frou Labour', she suggested that the 'want of fitting employment--real purpose in their life' was responsible."  p 155, boldface mine.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 14, 2009, 05:06:52 PM
Pat, that's a wonderful, thougthful quote you've posted and i'm sure very true. I also think that anyone on the "extremes" of "normal" in any area of life has a more difficult time in our "normal" society. So, being very intelligent, passionate, whatever -whether male or female, but especially female in the nineteenth century might send anyone into a mental disorder. People on the extremes have much more adjusting to do to fit into the "normal" society. For many it must be most frustrating and exhausting. ...........who should i be? how much should i compromise myself to be like everyone else? or like my family/friends want me to be? ......I think that has been a challenge for women thru most of history. "Reflecting on 'the number of invalids that exist among women exempted frou Labour', she suggested that the 'want of fitting employment--real purpose in their life' was responsible." Sounds like Betty Friedan's Feminine Mystic, uh?

Mary Lincoln had many challenges in her immediate family, the interest she had in politics had to be channeled thru a husband, the death of her son - at this time, and the conflicts on the war that she had w/ her biological family, which i suppose we will talk about later. I want to get the recent book on ML to see how she is portrayed by an author in the 21st century. AL certainly must have asked himself the same questions at times - am i lazy, as my father said i was? is reading the escape of a lazy person? .............I actually can identify w/ that one because my father grumped and growled frequently when i was reading a book and not doing something he considered to be more productive like mowing the grass, weeding the garden, cleaning the house, raking the leafs...... :-\ :-\......... jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 14, 2009, 06:38:02 PM
hings change so they can remain the same.

franklin says:"Not being used to Liberty, they know not how to make a modest use of it…...". I've heard the same statement about the many immigranty groups that are arriving now.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 14, 2009, 07:10:33 PM
3.  What were the .... weaknesses of each man as a potential presidential candidate?

That deserves a more thoughtful answer than I'm going to give.

Goodwin answers it for the three when she says that Lincoln is ".[n]ot hindered by the hubris, delusions, and inconsistencies that plagued his three rivals" (p224).

All of these refer to all the rivals, but some more than others.

Hubris refers to Seward: so overconfident of his selection that he ignores many chances to make political "hay", and also ignores or underestimates Greeley's enmity.

Delusion is Chase who believes what he wants to believe about his candidacy.

Inconsistency is all of them. Goodwin points out that Lincoln was the only one who stuck to the same positions throughout.

We'll see in the convention that Lincoln managed to turn his main disadvantage (the fact that he was relatively unknown) into an advantage. Another disadvantage was his appearance. Until people knew him, it was hard to take this "hick" serious as a President. I don't imagine he could be elected today without a "makeover" I can just imagine the TV aides trying to spruce him up and give him makeup for a TV debate.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 14, 2009, 08:04:59 PM
Kearns gives us tidbits of the lives of those women close to the Team of Rivals”.  What is especially interesting is the physical problems of Seward’s wife. She refused to move to Washington with him preferring to stay in Auburn N. Y.   with her children.  I don’t recall how many children they had, but Kearns only tells us of the ones that lived. There undoubtedly were miscarriages in between these live births, since birth control other than abortion was basically unknown or of little use.  Reading between the lines I would venture to say that her reason not to move to Washington was to prevent future pregnancies.  Kearns also tells us that she was a sickly woman, that she was semi-invalid.  Frances Seward once speculated whether the various nervous afflictions and morbid habits that plagued so many women she knew had their origin in the frustrations of an educated woman’s life in the mid-nineteenth century.  An unpublished essay she wrote on the status of woman states, “Want of fitting employment- real purpose in their life was responsible.”  Well educated upper middle class women were encouraged to be sickly.  Catherine Beecher stated that three out of every five women of her acquaintance were invalids either due to excessive childbearing or the culture of the age.  They were encouraged to be ill.  It was a mark of distinction to be thought of as delicate.  One prominent physician remarked that “if a woman knew what danger she was in from her pelvic organs, she would not step from her carriage to the pavement.  According to the physicians what contributed to ill health in that era was education.  In 1873 a Dr. Edward Clark of Harvard published as book called, "Sex and Education” in which he argued that higher education destroyed the reproductive function of American women by overworking their physiological development at a critical time in their lives.  Such women were likely to become ill.  A Dr. Mitchell Weir had teh cure for “neurasthenia” as these ailments came to be called.  The patient was confined to bed for six weeks and reading was positively forbidden.  Charlotte Gilman in “The Yellow Wallpaper ( although a  short story) very aptly described the struggle that Frances Seward faced and the treatment prescribed by Dr. Mitchell Weir.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 15, 2009, 11:15:42 AM
You're reminding me of Women and Madness by Phyllis Chesler that first came out in the 1970's. Here's a comment about it from the Library Journal

Why are women pathologized, but not treated, when they exhibit a normal human response to abuse and stress - including the lifelong stress of second-class citizenship?

Phyllis Chesler confronts questions like these and persuasively argues that double standards of mental health and illness exist and that women are often punitively labeled as a function of gender, race, class, or sexual preference.

Jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 15, 2009, 03:01:52 PM
Another book on the medical treatment of women during the period is by Barbara Ehrinreich. I can't remember the name -- I'll try to find it.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 15, 2009, 03:30:49 PM
How about "For Her Own Good"?   You seem to have a choice of 150 or 200 years.

http://www.amazon.com/s/qid=1237145207/ref=sr_pg_1?ie=UTF8&rs=1000&keywords=barbara%20ehrenreich%20for%20her%20own%20good&rh=i%3Astripbooks%2Ck%3Abarbara%20ehrenreich%20for%20her%20own%20good&page=1 (http://www.amazon.com/s/qid=1237145207/ref=sr_pg_1?ie=UTF8&rs=1000&keywords=barbara%20ehrenreich%20for%20her%20own%20good&rh=i%3Astripbooks%2Ck%3Abarbara%20ehrenreich%20for%20her%20own%20good&page=1)
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 15, 2009, 04:20:15 PM
We already saw some of Seward's mistakes.  Chase was overconfident too.  Thinking the nomination would just fall into his lap, he didn’t bother to work for it, rejecting offers of help, not checking that the delegates of his own state were pledged to him, etc.  He didn’t appoint a campaign manager to do the necessary maneuvering for him, and he himself had little feel for what people were thinking.

Bates was fairly conservative, and his attempts to appeal to a wider audience weakened his natural support without gaining new supporters.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 15, 2009, 06:03:29 PM
CHAPTERS 8-11 - NEW WEEK, NEW QUESTIONS, NEW START! 

TAKE A BREATH EVERYONE, A BREAK!!


PAT and I THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION, IT MEANS A LOT TO A DISCUSSION TO HAVE IDEAS AND OPINIONS FROM LOTS OF PEOPLE. 

IF YOU ARE JUST LURKING, READING, INTERESTED, DO POST! 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
First Question:

So why Chicago then.  And the Democrats this year.  What is it about the city?  Have you been there?  What do you remember about it?  What did it mean to the candidates?  To Lincoln?  What books have you read featuring Chicago?

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 16, 2009, 09:43:12 AM
So here come the Republicans, rolling into Chicago at the terrific speed of 60 mph, 40,000 strong, as Jean points out.  Since the city's population was a little over 100,000, it's no wonder they had to sleep on pool tables.  Did they realize the momentous nature of what they were doing?  Let's see how the drama plays out.

This week we're concentrating on chapters 8-11, starting with the Chicago convention, going on to the campaign, Lincoln's election, the tumultous national events which followed and Lincoln's selection of his cabinet, ending at the eve of his inauguration.

Where is everyone in the book?  If you haven't gotten this far, talk about where you are--there's plenty left to say.  If you're farther along, talk with us while we catch up.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 16, 2009, 01:04:01 PM
SHOWDOWN IN CHICAGO.  Let’s start with that.  I’ve been to the city a few times, loved it, my daughter goes every year to meet a friend who comes from Michigan.

From NYC it only took 16 hours by train in 1860.

Lavish preparations were made; citizens were asked to open their homes to those arriving as guests, boarding houses were full, as were hotels.  You could get a class of ale and a ham sandwich for ten cents!

"We are facing a crisis; there are troublous times ahead of us.   What this country will demand as its chief executive for the next four years is a man of the highest order of executive ability, a man of real statesmanlike qualities, well known to the country and of large experience in national affairs." said one speaker who was promoting Seward.

Doesn’t that sound like a speech that would apply today?  At our convention last year in Chicago?

Isn’t history fascinating?

HELLO, PAT!  Yes, where is everyone, taking a breather?

COME BACK FOLKS!  We are waiting for your comments!

I want to talk campaign strategy, never having been to one.






Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 16, 2009, 01:32:49 PM
Since i was ahead of the readings, i'll repost what i wrote in #91

I was astonished that 40,000 people came to the convention. Railroads had expanded across the country and i'm sure that is why so many were able to come. And, as was typical at the time, women were relegated to the side galleries, ironically, making men find a woman to accompany HIM to get a seat in the galleries. 10,000 people were in the convention hall. My question has always been when i read about big crowds and speech-makers before there was electricity - how do they hear what is going on on the stage, or from the floor?

It's been a while since "German-Americans" were considered as a voting block. That bought a smile to my face, remembering Ben Franklin's comment at one time that G-A'ns were a brutish, discourteous group.....yes, every immigrant group has had a similar comment made about them.

There is a wonderful "what if..........." historical moment - if there was no Horace Greeley who held a grudge about Seward, there may have been no Pres Lincoln. ..............jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 16, 2009, 02:24:11 PM
There is a wonderful "what if..........." historical moment - if there was no Horace Greeley who held a grudge about Seward, there may have been no Pres Lincoln. ..............jean

Yes, and Greeley worked hard because of his grudge.  No one expected him to be there, but he wormed his way in by getting appointed as a proxy representative for Oregon.  Then he worked through the night persuading the committee of undecided states that Seward couldn't win.

I hadn't realized that Oregon was a State already, but it was, admitted in 1859.  It turns out that there were already 33 States in 1860: The original 13 (DE, PA, NJ, GA, CN, MA, MD, SC, NH, VA, NY, NC, RI) plus Vermont 1791, Kentucky 1792, Tennessee 1796, Ohio 1803, Louisiana 1812, Indiana 1816, Mississippi 1817, Illinois 1818, Alabama 1819, Maine 1820, Missouri 1821, Arkansas 1836, Michigan 1837, Florida 1845, Texas 1845, Iowa 1846, Wisconsin 1848, California 1850, Minnesota 1858, and Oregon 1859.  That's more than I would have thought.

Kansas wasn't yet a state.  The Lecompton Constitution, which was supposed to sneak it in as a slave state, failed in Congress; it got in in 1861.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 16, 2009, 02:26:48 PM
"German-Americans as a voting block".  I'd love to know how many they were; I have no notion, even though some of them were my husband's ancestors.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 16, 2009, 05:57:30 PM
The problem some people had with a German-American voting block. That sounds a bit quaint now, doesn't it? But that was nothing compared to the problem many had with extending the franchise to Blacks. Free states had their 'black laws', which prevented free blacks in their midst from voting, serving on juries, or witnessing in court. It's been a long road for them.

And then there is the problem with abridgements. I liked the example Pat had for us. Wouldn't you agree that all reported or recorded history is an abridgement? Something or someone always gets left out. I guess the classic abridgement is the creation story in Genesis. It was obviously decided to keep it simple, but tantalyzing enough to invite lots of commentary.

The point I'm trying to make is that Doris Goodwin has succeeded so well in being comprehensive. Reading her makes one realize how much other historians of the period have left out. The posts relfect that. The lives of political wives somehow is made almost as interesting as the abolition plank in a party's platform. Of all First Ladies, Mary Todd Lincoln seems to have suffered the most unusual fate. She grew up with a great interest in politics, yet seemed to be shut out by her political husband, finding an outled for her energies in shopping trips, hoping, praying, for his reelection in '64 so that her debts would not come to light.

What am I reading about Chicago? I haven't yet read it, but it looks interesting. American Apocalypse: The Great Fire and the Myth of Chicago, by Ross Miller. That was only 11 years after the great convention of 1860. No 'short and simple annal' for this great American city. From village to metropolis in a few decades.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 16, 2009, 06:01:46 PM
Lincoln was a product of his society as we all are.  Douglas portrayed him as “Negro-loving agitator bent on debasing white society”, but Lincoln did not believe in equality between the races, but he believed that “there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence.  He agreed with Douglas that the black man “ is not my equal in many respects- certainly not in color, perhaps not in moral and intellectual endowment.  But in the right to eat the bread, without leave o anybody else, which his own hand earns, he is my equal and the equal of Judge Douglas, and the equal of every living man.”  And yet it is interesting to note that there was no provision made for the freed slaves either during the war or when the war was over.  Doctorow’s “The March” is an excellent historical novel of the Civil War and he paints a very poignant picture or the freed slaves following the Union armies.  There was no food, no shelter, and little compassion.  And because Lincoln was the product of the society in which he lived he could not have thought otherwise because he would have lost the election in a state that not only supported discriminatory Black Laws but had even passed a special law making it a criminal offense to bring into the boundaries of Illinois “as person having in him one fourth negro blood, whether free or slave.”     Seward did not believe that the black man was the equal of the white, or was capable of assimilation  but nevertheless they deserved to have all the privileges of the whites.  One has to wonder, however, considering that the thinking of the time was that blacks were not the equal of the white man, why did the former black slaves, who were illiterate and uneducated get the vote sixty years before the women did?  This fact outraged Elizabeth Stanton and her co-workers in the Women’s Rights Movement, women who were well educated, articulate, and “forgotten.”  Abigail Adam’s admonition to her husband, “Remember the ladies”, was again forgotten for another three generations.
     
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 16, 2009, 07:49:24 PM
This political convention took me back many years, remeembering when candidates were chosen at the conventions; many ballots and we heard rumors of deals made in "smoke filled rooms". The way we do it now is better (even though the primaries this time seemed to go on forever), but less dramatic.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 16, 2009, 09:44:29 PM
Yes, Joan, the conventions are hardly worth watching these days..........I remember reading about the 1960 convention and RFK trying to get LBJ to say "no" to JFK's offer of the v.p. What a drama that was...................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Emily on March 17, 2009, 12:49:13 AM
Since I am reading, "First Ladies" by Carl Sferrazza Anthony (first volume) and have finished the chapter on Mary Todd Lincoln, hope you don't mind if I comment on her entry into the position as First Lady.


Anthony describes Mary Lincoln, "She was intelligent and talented, gifted with witty vivid language. Her mind had a tremendous capacity for detail. She was highly literate, reciting Shakespeare and poetry from memory, translating German and French works by Victor Hugo, studying astromony. She spoke perfect French, was a student of opera, adored the theater, and worked hard to establish a library in Springfield. She had impeccable fashion and decorating taste."

Mary Lincoln suffered from an 'un-diagnosed' ailment that often flared to extremes after eating sweets, later termed to be diabetes.

She suffered from terrible headaches and even convulsions, but there was no test and therefore no treatment.

When Abraham learned he had won the election, his joyous shout to his wife was revealing, "We are elected"

No presidents wife had participated so fully in a presidential campaign as Mary Lincoln. She attended his rallies, she received journalists in her home in Springfield. She traveled to New York and spoke out on many subjects. She was harshly criticized by the press and it would only get worse during the White House years. Never before had the press so thouroughly covered a president's wife, and no woman had assumed the role under more trying circumstances.

Highly intelligent women who spoke out on any subject were not appreciated in that age, and things have not changed much today. They are only barely tolerated today and if they attempt to escape that narrow zone, they will be attacked and put in their place by the press. Nothing has changed except the numbers, we just have more blubbering buffoons today via television and print.

Anthony writes, "Her greatest political ability was a skillful judgement of individuals jockeying to get close to the president. Even with a mounting pack of critics, Mary, assumed and held her rightful position as lady of the mansion." She realized she had enemies all about her. In the cabinet, her two foes were Sec. of State William Seward and Treasury Sect. Salmon Chase. She saw their ambition was to use Lincoln to succeed him.

She saw Seward as weak on abolition. He attempted to control her State dinners. Chase's daughter hostess Kate fomented the hostility by audaciously receiving her guests in one White House room while the First Lady was receiving hers in another. She was told that Chase was spreading rumors to discredit her.

She disliked Seward long before the inaugural. She lashed out at him, "It is said you are the power behind the throne. I'll show you that Mr. Lincoln is president yet." Mary demanded he be fired along with Chase, President Lincoln told her that if he did as she wished, he would have no cabinet. Mary did get many 'pro Lincoln' appointees in through her husband and lessened the power of their enemies.

Even the brutal sect. of war Edwin Stanton was no match for Mary when she wanted 'Pro-Lincoln' appointees. Stanton at first refused to accomodate her requests, but later did and then lied about it. The author has extensive notes and sources in the book.

During the war she refused to leave the White House on a generals orders when Confederates were nearby and the White House was unprotected. She showed courage, and perhaps had her diabetes been treatable at the time, her life would have been easier. She was the first political wife, and the desire for her husbands success and safety from enemies within and without, led her to be attacked from all sides. Even in her failure she fought back.

Her life became one tragedy after another.

Emily

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 17, 2009, 12:05:39 PM
Lincoln was a product of his society as we all are.  Douglas portrayed him as “Negro-loving agitator bent on debasing white society”, but Lincoln did not believe in equality between the races, but he believed that “there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence.  He agreed with Douglas that the black man “ is not my equal in many respects- certainly not in color, perhaps not in moral and intellectual endowment.  But in the right to eat the bread, without leave o anybody else, which his own hand earns, he is my equal and the equal of Judge Douglas, and the equal of every living man.”

Yes, Lucky, it's interesting to try to figure out Lincoln's attitude.  Goodwin says historians have failed to find a single act of racial bigotry in his life, and quotes  Frederick Douglass, who often criticized Lincoln, that he was "the first great man that I talked with in the United States freely, who in no single instance reminded me of the difference between himself and myself, of the difference of color." and that he felt with Lincoln an "entire freedom from popular prejudice against the colored race." (207-8)

That's a good point about no provision being made for the freed Blacks.  People don't really follow through, do they?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 17, 2009, 12:15:40 PM
Hi, Jonathan, it's good to see you.  I agree with you about how thorough Goodwin seems, though, since I'm no historian, I can't tell what she left out.

Emily, it's good of you to share that extra information about Mary Todd Lincoln with us.  I wonder what modern medicine and present-day opportunities would have done for her.

I hope you'll continue sharing insights your us, whether or not you're reading the book.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 17, 2009, 04:06:27 PM
The Book Club Online  is  the oldest  continuing book club on the Internet, begun in 1996, open to everyone.  We offer cordial discussions of one book a month,  24/7 and  enjoy the company of readers from all over the world.  Everyone is welcome to join in.

Team of Rivals
by
Doris Kearns Goodwin

(http://seniorlearn.org/bookclubs/teamofrivals/teamcvr.jpg)                         

"More books about Abraham Lincoln line the shelves of libraries than about any other American. Can there be anything new to say about our 16th president? Surprisingly, the answer is yes. - ..... Doris Kearns Goodwin has written an elegant, incisive study of Lincoln......." - New York Times

The Team:
William H. Seward
Salmon P. Chase
Edward Bates
.........     Links:
NPR Review (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4989622)
Wilmot Proviso (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilmot_Proviso)
Dred Scott Decision (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford)
Kansas-Nebraska Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas-Nebraska_Act)
Fugitive Slave Law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Slave_Law_of_1850)
March 15 -Chapters 8-11
March 22 - Chapters 12-15
.........March 29 - Chapters 16-19
April 5 -      Chapters 20-23
April 12 -    Chapters 24 -26

To Consider in Chapters 12-15

1.  Could Lincoln have avoided war by giving in to the South’s demands?

2.  Do you think Lincoln was deliberately aiming for war by reinforcing Forts Sumter and Pickens?

3. How did Seward’s attitude toward Lincoln change?  Why?

4. At the start of hostilities, Lincoln authorized the suspension of Habeas Corpus under limited conditions.  Were you surprised?

5. What would have happened if Lee had accepted the Union Command?

6. What do you think of Mary’s redecorating and entertaining?

7. In this section we start to see the results of Lincoln’s policy of surrounding himself with rivals and men of different factions.  How is it working out?

8. At the start of the war, Lincoln was plagued with a series of ineffective generals.  Was this inevitable?

9. What happened in the battles so far?

10. So far, Lincoln is still insisting that the war is about preserving the Union, and not about slavery.  What do you think of this?

11. Lincoln and Mary coped with their grief for Willie in very different ways.  Was either preferable?

 
 

Discussion Leaders:
Ella (egibbons28@columbus.rr.com) & PatH (rjhighet@earthlink.net)








                                                                                                             
JoanK's post
One of the "Lincoln seminars on CSpan, it was pointed out that students of Lincoln and his days divide sharply on whether they are "pro-Mary or anti-Mary., with the pendulum swinging toward the pro-Mary. It's good to hear that point of view. Like any human being, she had good and bad qualities. We don't have to labor her as "good" or "bad". Perhaps if her diabetes had been treated, we wouldn't have these stories of wierd behavior. She was also a "shopoholic", which led to much criticism. Neither she nor the people around her understood this as an addiction.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 18, 2009, 08:41:08 AM
JEAN has a good question about the people hearing what is being said at the convention; I have always wondered the same about the public speeches given by candidates where thousands came to hear them - long before the microphone!  How?  And Lincoln had a rather high squeaky voice, I think I read.  I doubt he would project very well on our TV’s!

Pat tells us there were 33 states represented at the 1860 convention, I hadn’t realized that either.  Many Southern states and one has to wonders if they were worried about the winner of the race for the nomination. 

Thanks for the post, JONATHAN, and I quite agree that all history is an abridgement, but Goodwin is pretty good at it as you said,; she has written a book that reads well and yet gives us insight to the period of Lincoln, the genius -  the man who managed his own campaign strategies, who said "make no contracts that bind me" and the man who inspired people.  One man observed: that:  "Most of them worked con amore, chiefly from love of the man, his lofty moral tone, his pure political morality." Wow!

Commentators on TV have marveled at Obama’s campaign strategies and reading about Lincoln’s one realizes that our president followed many of Lincoln’s steps, don’t you agree?    I was particularly interested to read that Seward stated:  "The leader of a political party in a country like ours is so exposed that his enemies become as numerous and formidable as his friends."    Further - "Lincoln, by contrast, comparatively unknown, had not to contend with the animosities generally marshaled against a leader."

Speaking of history repeating itself!  Hillary, McCain and all the others, the country knew them.

At the top of Page 254 are more comments that Goodwin makes about Lincoln’s victory in Chicago, the grain yard of America in 1860; later to become the butcher shop.
 
THANKS, LUCKY, for your post.  Those remarks of Lincoln have been criticized extensively  Weren’t those views on race in his Cooper Union speech?   And you make the point that no provisions were made for the slaves after the war, but at the time I think the country was so weary, and its president assassinated, and, no doubt, the coffers were empty.  What could have been done?   And, as you say, women were left out of any rights at all until 1920 I believe it was. 

EMILY, what a great post about Mary Todd Lincoln, THANK YOU!  I enjoyed hearing, for a change, something good about her , she has been so abused by most historians and I have always thought  she must have been a burden on Lincoln before and after he was president.  But your statements indicate she was an asset ,  particularly in helping with his campaigns and his presidential years. 

BLUBBERING BUFFOONS!  Hahahaa    I like that, and I would love to hear your pick on those on TV!  I have  looked at the book on first ladies at the Library and now I must read about Mary!

Later, eg
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 18, 2009, 08:59:11 AM
THE DEMOCRATS!  OUR TWO-PARTY SYSTEM FAILED!  THEIR CONVENTION IN SOUTH CAROLINA ENDED IN CHAOS.  

WHY?  What did the Dred Scott decision have to do with it?  We should linger a bit here in our historic trip through history.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 18, 2009, 09:04:12 AM
THE DEMOCRATS!  OUR TWO-PARTY SYSTEM FAILED!  THEIR CONVENTION IN SOUTH CAROLINA ENDED IN CHAOS.  

WHY?  What did the Dred Scott decision have to do with it?  We should linger a bit here in our historic trip through history.

Yes, let's get to that, but one last comment first: as JoanK points out above, the pendulum is swinging back from anti-Mary to pro-Mary, so maybe she will be more fairly treated now.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 18, 2009, 09:15:47 AM
OUR TWO PARTY SYSTEM FAILED!
I was startled at the shuffling and re-dealing of political parties going on at this time, and slavery was by far the biggest issue.  Ella, I thing you've put your finger on a crucial event in the process.  Give us your thoughts, everyone.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 18, 2009, 09:52:14 AM
Right, PAT!  For reference, see the link in the heading , and on pags. 188-189 in our book the scenario is written very well by Goodwin.  "Initially, the decision appeared to be a stunning victory for the South/"
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 18, 2009, 03:55:04 PM
WHOPEE! I got my book from the library! Oh my! The DVD is VERY abridged. i've read about 80 pages of the book and what a good read! Of course, i've always enjoyed DKG's writing. I don't understand how they could put out a DVD that is abridged w/out stating that it is somewhere on the packaging. The book provides such good in-depth background on the whole team, i'm thoroughly enjoying it. My decision now is to whether i try to catch up, or go to Chapter 8 and read w/ you all.  :-\ .........i'll probably do both..............

Some of you have alluded to whether AL could be elected today in our TV world. I think his look and his voice would have been a major detriment. How long has it been since we even had a "balding" president??? IKE? Yes, Ford, but he lost election in his own right. Perot was the only candidate we've had recently who did not have a "pleasant" speaking voice. If the majority of the country could have seen and heard AL and if he had had a "history" for people to scrutinize..............................??.................ummmmmm. I don't know.

I'm not going to go back and comment on the early part of the book, but i did love the Emily Dickinson quote "There is no Frigate like a Book....." They can take you anywhere and to any time and it is one of the reasons i love reading so much. On the next page (52) there is one thing about AL that i think many of us could identify with............."Everywhere he went, L carried a book w/ him......... " Certainly is true for me and i'm sure for many of you.

Every young person should read an intimate bio of Lincoln and discover that self-education can be very beneficial and reading is the foundation of self-education.

DKG's use of language is so enjoyable. On pg 54 she writes, .."What L lacked in preparation and guidance, he made up for w/ his daunting concentration, phenomenal memory, acute reasoning faculties, and interpretive penetration."  I love the adjectives.......................jean

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 18, 2009, 05:37:57 PM
Jean, hooray! you're going to enjoy all the tidbits that were probably left out of the audio.

"My decision now is to whether i try to catch up, or go to Chapter 8 and read w/ you all.   :-\ .....i'll probably do both."

I hope you do do both; there is a world of amusing machination in this section.

Could Lincoln be elected today looking as he did?  There are a number of incidents in this section of someone meeting Lincoln for the first time and being dismayed by his appearance, but ending up totally impressed when he talked for a while.  I like Joank's picture of him threatened with a TV makeover.  I can't quite see him submitting.

One of my favorite quotes so far is from Simon Cameron, Pennsylvania political boss:
"an honest politician is one who, when he is bought, stays bought"
Cameron didn't understand why Lincoln wouldn't appoint him Secretary of the Treasury.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 18, 2009, 08:41:52 PM
The Winter 2009, American Heritage Magizine, has a special section on Lincoln: L as Cmdr in Chief; Douglass and L: Fight to end Slavery; L as Speech Maker; L sinks the Merrimack; If he hadn't Died? And there's a terrific picture which is done by Robt Silvers of Matthew Brady's haunting portrait of AL made up of tiny pieces of pictures from the civil war. I tried to find it on line to give you a link, and it is for sale, but the pics that i saw on line weren't distinct enough for you to see the Civil War pics.  It is, of course, done digitally.  It is one of those things that if you stand back from it, you see the portrait very clearly, but when you look closely you see it has been made by piecing together tiny pics of people or events of the CW.........

The American Heritage Mag had stopped publishing about a hear ago, but has come back. They also have a new website that lists all of the historic sites across the country. It is www.HeritageSites.us. There is also an article about the reopening of the National Museum of American History at the Smithsonian. The first exhibit that you see when you enter is the repaired "STar-spangled BAnner." The whole building has been reconfigured and modernized. You can see their website and what exhibits they are showing at http://americanhistory.si.edu/ ................back to my reading..........jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 18, 2009, 09:03:18 PM
All the details are great, but can be a problem for a casual reader of history like me. A consciencious historian can put in a lot of detail that might be important to someone else in the field, but isn't interesting in itself. Goodwin gets it about right.

I'm remembering a biography I read of Oscar Wilde, Wilde was one of those people who knew EVERYONE, and the biographer felt that he had to give a biography of everyone he knew, whether they were interesting or not!

One person I wish Goodwin had told us more about was a John Morse, who was involved in Chases election schemes in Ohio. Since my mother's mname was Morse, they lived in Ohio at that time, and there were Johns in the family, I can't help but wonder if we're related.

I do have at least one relative in the story. Goodwin talks about how John brown's exploits fanned the flame for the abolitionists. (He wanted to set up a community that would be a safehaven for runaway slaves. To get arms to defend it, he raided the armory at Harpors Ferry. After a bloody battle, he was captured, and eventually hung. But before that, he was kept in prison for a long time, and reporters were allowed free access to him. Ebvery day, his stiorring speeches against slavery would be reported in Northern newspapers, and it was those speeches, rather than his actual accomplishments, that roused anti-slavery feeling to a fever pitch. Later, Union soldiers would march to the tune of "John brown's Body".

Since PatH and I are distantly related to Brown (we are his fourth cousens four times removed), I have always been interested in him. It's ironic that Goodwin says Herman Melville wrote a eulogy on his death, because it always struck me that Brown was the opposite of Captain Ahab in Moby Dick. Melville has Ahab saying "All my means are sane: omly my ends are mad". It seems to me that John Brown could have said "All my ends are sane, only my means are mad".
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 19, 2009, 11:44:29 AM
It was Mark Twain who said "We have the best politicians money can buy" wasn't it?  And Khrushchev said, "Politicians are the same the world over; they promise to build a bridge even where there is no river."  We could go on and on, and they do!!!!

They are fodder for the comedians, for the witty.  I liked the one you quoted, Pat!

Thanks for those sites, JEAN, I clicked on them.  I've been to many of them, actually, most of the battlefields which my husband wanted to see.  He was so fascinated by their weaponry, their guns and their strategies.  How warfare has changed - and changed again in our lifetimes!  I am going to the Hudson River Valley in May for more glimpses of the early 1900's history and beyond.

I am so glad you have the book, so much more satisfying to have it in your hand and do read the chapters we are on and continue posting.  It's fun to discuss history with others who want to learn more and discuss all these weighty matters that faced these people and our country.

JOAN, here is something just for you and Pat

                   http://www.contemplator.com/america/johnbrown.html

Now I sat here and sang all the verses after I downloaded the midi, but I needed someone to harmonize!!!  Let's all stand up and sing!!

---------------------------------

We complain about Congress, its bipartianship, its agonizing debates, their committees, but they are necessary don't you agree?  The two-party system compromises until usually they get it right. 

There is reference in these pages (and I'm not sure where) that the Democratic Party wanted to nationalize slavery.  I think it was about where Lincoln was giving his House Divided speech - I'll look it up!  IMAGINE!  And I think Chief Justice Tanney was a part of that?  We must look it up. 

They couldn't compromise???

Are any of you amazed at the scant amount of knowledge available for AL's vice-president, Hannibal Hamlin whom L chose?  All of a sudden he just appeared in the book - even in the Index there is little and, of course, he was succeeded by Andrew Johnson in AL's second term and became president.  I must look up Hamlin on Google.  Obama certainly didn't follow that example for his VP.

Why did those Southern States walk out of their convention?  If they had stayed and compromised, might the war never have happened?  What could they have done rather than secede?





 
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 19, 2009, 01:19:35 PM
"Let's all stand up and sing"  No fear, Ella, I'll be singing it the rest of the day--listen hard and you can probably hear me.  I prefer Julia Ward Howe's words, though.  I have a taste for overblown heroics, and stuff like "Let the Hero, born of woman, crush the serpent with his heel" is pretty good.

As children, we knew another version:
"(John Brown's baby had a cold upon its chest)3x
So they rubbed it with camphorated oil."

This was sung with gestures--rocking your arms  for "baby", coughing for "cold", pointing to your chest, rubbing, holding your nose for "camphorated oil", etc.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 19, 2009, 03:59:06 PM
Oh, I never heard that one, Pat!
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 19, 2009, 04:04:31 PM
Tra la la, I'm still singing.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 19, 2009, 04:05:48 PM
The Dred Scott Decision was the culmination of a series of events in the slavery-anti-slavery struggle, mostly going farther and farther to favor the South.

Originally, under the Constitution and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, slavery was permitted in the original States, and forbidden in the Northwest Territory or states formed from it.  As more land was acquired, there were fights over whether slavery would be permitted there.  The Missouri Compromise forbade slavery north of 36 deg 30 min except for the state of Missouri, the Wilmot Proviso, if it had passed, would have forbidden slavery in the land acquired in the Mexican-American War, the Kansas-Nebraska Act nullified the Missouri Compromise by allowing these two territories to choose to become either slave or free states.

This wasn’t solely a battle about the morality of slavery.  It was a struggle for personal opportunity, territory, and political power.  If slavery were banned in the territories, Southerners would be at a disadvantage in the big homesteading move west, for new chances and a better life.  If all the new states were free, the South would become a smaller and smaller minority in Congress, and be unable to defend any of their regional interests.

The Dred Scott decision tipped the balance hugely.  Using some dubious legal arguments, it essentially said that a slave was not a person, but property, and since the Constitution says that no man should be deprived of his property, by implication it allowed slavery everywhere.  The decision greatly emboldened the South in pushing for their demands.

This doesn’t answer Ella’s question about the splitting of the parties, but I wanted to put a summary in somewhere.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 19, 2009, 04:44:11 PM
I see my Northern bias is showing in that last post.  A Northerner would say that the South kept adding areas of slavery.  A Southerner would say they were maintaining parity as the nation expanded.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 19, 2009, 07:53:54 PM
We're proposing a discussion for May of "Three Cups of Tea". I've started the book, and had a hard time putting it down. It's the story of a "climbing bum", who got lost coming down from a failed attempt to climb K2, and wound up in a Pakistani village so small, it wasn't on the map. When he left, he promised he would come back and build a school. He wound up building over 100 schools for girls, in the area controlled by the Taliban.

If you're interested, come let us know in "Proposed discussions" or here:

http://seniorlearn.org/forum/index.php?board=57.0 (http://seniorlearn.org/forum/index.php?board=57.0)
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 20, 2009, 11:46:29 AM
When Lincoln came to DC before the Inauguration, he stayed at the Willard Hotel.  The hotel is still there, though it looks different now.  An inn was started on the site in 1847, and expanded a lot in 1858.  The building was hugely remodeled at the turn of the century, reopening in 1904.  When I was growing up it was quite a showcase, with a gigantic, ornate lobby, with little lounges off it that were good places to meet people.  It was closed from 1968-86, but restored to its former grandeur, snd is now on the National Register of Historic Places.

Many presidents stayed there, Julia Ward Howe wrote "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" there, Martin Luther King wrote his "I Have a Dream" speech there, etc.  I couldn't find a good picture of it, but here is the rather dry site where I checked my facts.  If you scroll down below the opening letter, you get a listing of historic sites, and the Willard is under "Downtown".

http://www.nps.gov/history/NR/travel/wash/text.htm#willard (http://www.nps.gov/history/NR/travel/wash/text.htm#willard)
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 20, 2009, 12:01:56 PM
That's me, the 'climbing bum' in this TOR discussion, lost in the stormy politics of pre-Civil War America. Thanks, Pat, for the review of the 
'series of events in the slavery-anti-slavery struggle', culminating in the Dred Scott discussion, with the South satisfied with its use of a branch of goverment, the Supreme Court,  in resolving the slavery issue in its favor, and the North, aghast at the abuse of judicial power. John Brown was, perhaps, only the most radical of the abolitionists who looked to exteme measures to free the slaves.

Take Frances Seward for example, the wife of Lincoln's chief rival. How hard Seward worked to elect Lincoln. One of his many speeches however disappointed some supporters, who felt the speech too full of compromise and concession. At this point Frances weighed in with a letter to her husband:

'Eloquent as your speech was it fails to meet the entire approval of those who love you best...Compromises based on the idea that the preservation of the Union is more important than the liberty of nearly 4,000,000 human beings cannot be right. The alteration of the Constitution to perpetuate slavery - the enforcement of a law to recapture a poor, suffering fugitive...these compromises cannot be approved by God or supported by good men....

'No one can dread war more than I do...yet I could not today assent to the perpetuation or extension of slavery to prevent war....' TOR, page 303.

I wonder how she felt later when it became apparent what the cost would be. Even her husband came wiithin a hairs breadth of falling a victim to the violence.

It occurred to me last night, watching Obama on the Leno show, what a tense period it was for both him and Lincoln, between election and inauguration. For Lincoln the country was coming apart. For Obama the American Dream was turning into a nightmare.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 20, 2009, 12:21:44 PM
It occurred to me last night, watching Obama on the Leno show, what a tense period it was for both him and Lincoln, between election and inauguration. For Lincoln the country was coming apart. For Obama the American Dream was turning into a nightmare.

Yes, good point, Jonathan, and they were both in the frustrating position of having to watch the outgoing president make decisions regarding a rapidly developing situation that they would then have to deal with.  Lincoln and his supporters did a good deal behind the scenes to keep the country from destabilizing more before the inauguration.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 20, 2009, 12:40:50 PM
That speech of Seward's lasted nearly two hours.  It reached Frances in Auburn by telegraph hours after it was delivered.  (p 303)  Pity the poor telegraph operator having to send it!
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 20, 2009, 03:44:14 PM
JONATHAN, you stayed up to hear Obama and Leno go at it!!!  So who got the best dig in?  It seems Obama can hold his own from what I have heard, but the commentators are after him already.  His huge package deal and Congress! 

As PAT said, Lincoln had a great deal on his shoulders too - A GREAT DEAL????  THE WHOLE COUNTRY was going down the tube and Lincoln was determined to somehow hold it together.  What a terrible decision!

What kind of compromise would have worked to avoid war?  Lincoln and others had tried to appease the South in numerous ways, but decisions about slavery had to be made and, as it turned out, it took several years after the war before the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment abolished it forever.  The South would never have voted for them in 1860.

What kind of state/nations would have evolved if the war had not been won by the North?  Would the Confederacy have held together.  It's something to think about.  Little countries here and there in the south; we would all have to have passports to enter.  Little Europe!
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 20, 2009, 04:52:10 PM
I can't help but think about Obama's reading this book thru the election and the aftermath. As i read about the way L handled the other candidates, to get them to support him and the party, i think Obama must have used AL's guidance, especially in talking to Hillary. I just can't imagine the depression one must feel after having worked so hard to try to get the nominiation, or to win an election. Of course, Hillary worked even harder than S, C, and Bates. I don't know how she stood up there w/ the tv cameras running and smiled and smiled and then was so gracious. She had been thru many elections before, maybe that helped.

Speaking of the telegraph......AL was able to keep in touch w/ what was going on in the states because of the tlgph. I believe he must have been the first nominee to be able to do that. I mentioned before that w/ the tlgph, it was the first time in history that on a general basis a msg could travel faster than a person. I guess you could say smoke signals and drum msgs could do that, but they were severely limited. It must have seemed like a miracle for information to be able to cross the country in about 24 hours, or less. Imagine what it did for commerce.

How long we in the United States have been enthalled by the "frontiersman," "a man of the people," "an ordinary man." It is interesting how we want our president to be someone like us during the campaign, but much smarter, more sophisticated, able to handle very complex issues, always make the right decision, once they are in office. That "John Wayne" type has had an appeal for a long time. Think of all the stories the country has loved about the "frontiersman" - Andrew Jackson, DAvey Crockett, Daniel Boone, Abraham Lincoln. In recent yrs we've been "sold"  ordinary-man-Truman, the ranchman Reagan, the peanut farmer, the man from small town Hope, the man who cuts down trees, cleans out brush. We've not "bought" the smart guys except by accident, in most cases. And Lincoln was "selling" himself 100 yrs before "The Selling of the President, 1960." And politicians had to careful what they said then also,  AL not wanting to answer questions, but pointing to the party platform. He had a few lapses in judgement - another similarity to Obama - and all the others. It's hitting us  in the face today.

pg 267 -"many Republicans remained hostile to immigrants and their support was essential." How many times can we say "the more things change............."
......jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 21, 2009, 10:51:53 AM
Hi JEAN!   I liked your remark about the "ordinary" man, the man of the people.  However, I would say that our President Obama is an "extraordinary" man wouldn't you?  One that will be historical forever.   

Seward seems to have had all the requisites for the office of the presidency and yet..............  why did Lincoln win?  ?  Our book mentions people listening with "rapt" attention to Seward's speeches, tears in their eyes.  I thought his idea of a Constitutional Convention a good one, didn't you?

Would that have produced a solution to the division over slavery?  Avoided war?

Why did Lincoln win I wonder.  Who would I have voted for?  If I had lived in the North?  If I had lived in the South?

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 21, 2009, 11:29:48 AM
This book, about the loss of culture because of the Civil War, was nominated for a National Book Award.  It looks very interesting, I intend to getit at my library next visit:

This Republic of Suffering by Drew Gilpin Faust, who is President of Harvard University and who holds the Lincoln Chair in History.

http://www.nationalbook.org/nba2008_nf_faust.html

The review: "More soldiers lost their lives in the American Civil War than in all American conflicts combined from the Revolution to the Korean War. Drew Gilpin Faust's highly original, deeply moving account explains the impact of this tremendous loss on American culture. Attending to politics, poetry and rituals of burial, remembrance and mourning, Faust reveals the way that the Civil War Dead came to represent both the ongoing hostility between the North and the South as well as the vehicle through which a new national unity could be imagined."

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 21, 2009, 01:14:51 PM
Goodwin says on p. 346 that if you lost the same percentage of today's population it would be more than 5 million!  It's hard to imagine such devastation.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 21, 2009, 02:32:10 PM
Politics is such a fascinating business, and I suppose it's just that, that inspired Goodwin to write Team Of Rivals. Its subtitle, after all, is The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln, and Goodwin piles on the instances of how hard Lincoln worked at it. And got so many others to work for him. So there may be a few insights in the book that might interest  even the professional politician. Like Obama.

Can there be any doubt that Hillary is Obama's Seward? With her tremendous number of supporters, just like Seward, how could Obama neglect to get her on side. The rivals all had their numerous supporters who would have wanted to see their man as part of the administration. Even that 'crook' Simon Cameron of Pennsylvania had enough political clout to get himself a secretaryship. As it turned out he was given the most difficult job of all...raising an army from scratch. It's not difficult to imagine the graft and corruption creeping into the process. Was it fair to blame it all on him? It wasn't pretty, but he got the job done.

Back to Seward, fine presidential material himself. A worthy rival. But just look how Lincoln handles a potential threat to himself politically. He makes Seward Secretary of State. And how could Goodwin resist quoting Lincoln's own words in giving Seward the job:

'Governor Seward, there is one part of my work that I shall have to leave largely to you. I shall have to depend upon you for taking care of these matters of foreign affairs, of which I know so little, and with which I reckon you are familiar.' page 316.

In other words, leave domestic affairs to me.

The Faust book, This Republic of Suffering, does look interesting. It seems to me the private, civil deaths in the book have  as much impact on the reader as the battlefield casualties. There's hardly a major character who does not suffer the loss of a loved one. Chase losing three wives. The Lincolns losing two young sons. Seward losing his teenage daughter, Fanny.

But it was Lincoln  who gave the soldier's death a profound meaning with his Gettysburg address. Those words were worth dying for.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 21, 2009, 02:33:29 PM
Pat, that is so costly in human lives isn't it?  I wonder if that estimate includes all the wounded?  Here is her statement:

"A war  had begun that no one imagined would last four years and cost greater than 600,00 lives-more than the cumulative total of all our other wars, from the Revolution to Iraq."

And then your statistic.

I doubt if any one, any country, any enemy considers how long their war might last and cost in sacrifice of lives?

Out of curiousity, I looked up WWII:  "The U.S., which had no significant civilian losses, sustained 292,131 battle deaths and 115,187 deaths from other causes." (Wikipedia)
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 21, 2009, 02:38:56 PM
"Can there be any doubt that Hillary is Obama's Seward?"  - JONATHAN

No doubt with me.  Obama's campaign strategy and presidency all resemble Lincoln; and had the war not intervened and his assassination occurred would have continued no doubt!

Obama is on his own, and flying all about the town,  and, as you said, JONATHAN, his nightmare has begun.  We all wish him success!
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 21, 2009, 03:17:41 PM
Ella - the 600,000 does not include the injured, that is the number of battlefireld deaths. I'm sure there were many more deaths whose cause could be attributed to the war if we projected out over a decade or more.

W.D. Brand was just on BookTV talking about his book "The Age of Gold." It is about the 1849 gold rush to Calif. He suggests that the Civil War may not have happened if there had been no gold rush. People had been flowing so slowly into the territories that there was not a great concern about slavery in the territories and the issue had been handled w/ a variety of compromises - as we know. Many in the North were not very concerned about the issue.


However, when 10's of thousands of people swarmed into CAlif and then a constitution was written for the state that excluded slavery, that was the impetus - according to Brand - for the South to get worried and forged the Fugitive Slave Act. It put many northerners in the position of having to apprehend and turn over escaped slaves, and sometimes people who had never been slaves. It put the slavery issue right into the faces of many northerners who hadn't paid much attention before. Also, as people journeyed west they almost all traveled thru Missouri, a slave state, seeing slave auctions and the treatment of slaves, that they had not witnessed before, stirring up the abolitionist movement, pushing the two sides to extremes and heightening the importance of whether the new states would be free or slave states.

A curious issue for me was on pg 273 there is the statement about the state elections in New England  being in September and the Indiana and Pa elections in Oct. I guess they were speaking only of the congressional elections, but isn't it curious that they were held in other months than the general election?

I also tho't it interesting that DKG includes C.F. Adams, Jr's comment about SEward's drinking not seeming to impair him, Adams coming from a family of alcholics that would catch his attention, i guess. (pg 269)....................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 21, 2009, 10:25:10 PM
JONATHAN: this has nothing to do with Team of Rivals, but you reminded me that you're a climbing bum. Do you remember several years ago, we were in a discussion about a climber in South America, who fell down a crevasse, and crawled his way back to camp? A very good book, and I want to recommend it in "Three Cups of Tea", but I can't remember the name or author.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 21, 2009, 10:29:53 PM
Certainly, Obama couldn't have guessed that there would be such a parallel with Lincoln in the period between election and inaugaration and just after assuming office! Another parallel I see in the new section, people are immediately criticizing him after he takes office for not making things "all right again".

Everyone is still trying to placate the South, especially Seward. But each attempt fails in the South and infuriates the North.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 22, 2009, 09:29:38 AM
Mabel, that's a convincing case for the rapid settling of California setting things up for the Civil War.

I wondered about the earlier state elections, too, especially since the outcome of the congressional races influenced the later vote for President.

Doesn't the campaign style of the time seem weird?  You don't appear yourself, you just let others say what a good President you would be.  Lincoln carried it to extremes, refusing to issue any statements and standing on the record of his published speeches.  It was a smart move, because he knew anything he said would be picked apart and distorted.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 22, 2009, 09:39:29 AM
We're ready to add Chapters 12-15 to the discussion, but that doesn't mean we have to stop talking about the earlier chapters.  It looks like we still have things to say.

12 starts with the Inauguration; then we go on to getting the administration going, firing on Fort Sumter, preparations for war, the battles of Bulls Run, in Missouri and in Tennessee, where at last we win some.  We end with the death of Willie Lincoln at the end of chapter 15.  These chapters read fairly fast, especially 14 and 15.

Some questions will go up later today.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 22, 2009, 10:29:10 AM
JEAN, that is such an interesting remark about the relationship between the 1849 Gold Rush (which most school children know about) and the Civil War.  I have never heard that before, but I can see that as a factor; furthermore I didn't know California had made a constitution excluding slavery.  When was their constitution enacted?

I could look it up, of course, but don't have the time right now.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on March 22, 2009, 10:46:28 AM
The question “Was there any possible way the war could have been avoided,” raises a number of important points.  I believe all wars can be avoided.  Kearns doesn’t go into the economic underpinnings of the war but they are there. There are always those who gain economically and those who lose economically from war.  If the powers that be had known that this war would last four years perhaps they would have decided to divide the U.S. into two countries.  If they had known the cost of lives  (over 600,000) and the maiming of those who survived they would have thought differently.  There was a time when England seriously thought of entering the war on the side of the south.  Because of the war a serious recession had hit the textile industries.   In 1860 Liverpool, the main source of imported cotton for the British textile industry, then the mainstay of the Victorian industrial economy, came from the south.  The Confederates believed that because of this, England would under pressure come into the war on the side of the south.  To ensure this, the Confederates imposed an embargo on all cotton imports to Liverpool and consequently cotton prices soared, mills closed and one quarter of the population of Lancashire was on poor relief. The English called it the cotton famine.  Historians believe that if the English had come to the aid of the south, the south would have been the victor.
What was really accomplished by this war?  The south was destroyed and generations of enmity existed between north and south that exploded with the Civil Rights movement.  The slaves were freed, but in the south their status for generations was slave-like, living as sharecroppers.    They lived in poverty for generations.  In the north they were discriminated against.  Nicholas Lehman’s excellent book “The Promise Land” is an excellent source on black migration to Chicago (the Promised Land).  I believe that slavery would eventually have been peaceably phased out.  Brazil, I believe, was last nation in the Western Hemisphere to outlaw slavery in the 1890’s.  From many of the sources on southern slavery, one can extrapolate enough information to determine that slavery was not economically feasible for the south.  White labor was a better and cheaper source of labor than the cost and care of slaves. 
Lincoln did not have much concern for the welfare of the slaves.  In l863 he issued his Emancipation Proclamation.  At a Emancipation Jubilee at Cooper Union he proposed that the blacks leave voluntarily.  In 1862 he had promoted a plan to transport 5,000 blacks to Ile a Vache, a small island off the coast of Haiti.  Most the blacks rejected this colonization plan.  The black citizens of Queens county New York notified him that America was their native land and they had no intention of leaving it.  Emancipation spurred them to join the army and fight for the total liberation of slaves not emigration. 
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 22, 2009, 12:13:31 PM
Joan, you  must be thinking of Joe Simpson's book, Touching The Void. I remember it well. Who could forget a tale such as that? It would be a good one to recommend to a group thinking of reading Three Cups of Tea. I've started reading it myself. Imagine spending every dollar on climbing equipment and airfares to get you to the high peaks on our globe. And when not climbing, using his car for living accommodations. With a rented storage unit for parking his stuff. Getting lost on the glacier below K2 could happen easily enough, by wandering off onto a spur. One can't always have ones wits about one as one plods along hour after hour. It certainly turned his life around. I think the book is getting more  attention all the time. Good luck.

Seward plays a curious role during those months before the outbreak of hostilities. A year or two earlier it was he who was talking publicly about the 'irrepressible conflict'. Now, when it seems imminent, with his southern senate colleagues packing up and saying goodbye, Seward becomes conciliatory and influential with Lincoln to be likewise in his inaugural address. The first attempt by Seward to determine Lincoln's course of action. Seward loved his Union as much as Lincoln, but it wasn't Seward who was about to take the oath to preserve it. An oath is a pretty grim business.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 22, 2009, 03:47:24 PM
These comments are a little behind the schedule.

A couple times in chapter's 10 and 11 DKG speaks to the responsibility that L begins to feel.  Right at the beginning of Ch 10 she says quoting Gideon Welles about election night, "The excitement which had kept him up through the campaign had passed away .....and he was oppresssed w/ the load of responsibility that was upon him." I felt that Obama was feeling the same way on election night in his speech in Grant Park. He seemed so subdued. I at first wondered if there had been assassination warnings, what w/ the glass walls around him, but then i tho't maybe all pres-elects have a moment when they say "OMG, now i'm responsible for the country!"

I think we may have AL to thank for something i never tho't of before - politicians giving shorter speeches!...................Seward's speech to Congress was 2 hours!..........remember Bill Clinton being berated in - was it 1988 - for his speech at the convention when he was still Gov of ARk and he talked for 55 minutes? Maybe after AL's wonderful, concise prose, other politicians decided they didn't need to speechify for such a long time!?!

700 people?!? the number that came to the L house the night before they left for Washington.............my first tho't was "how to you get 700 people in that house, even a house w/ "twin parlors?" My second tho't was "how do  you provide food and drink for 700 people in your house?"

DKG says ML was so excited to go to NYC to shop. "After years of making do on a limited budget,  this woman who was raised in a wealthy household took great pleasure in acquiring everything she wanted, even to the point of outspending her wealthier sisters."  I know she spent a huge amt of money and bo't way more than she needed, but I didn't think she was on such a limited budget before they were elected. I remember hearing some L expert talk about the fact that L was the atty for one of the railroads and made very good money and was one of the wealthiest men in Illinois at the time." Do any of you have any info about their financial situation?.............jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 22, 2009, 09:08:28 PM
Jonathan: thanks -- that's the book! Have you signed up for the Three Cups discussion in May yet?

Yes, Seward seems to always be making speeches that don't reflect what seem to be his true opinions. Before the election, he made such ringing anti-slavery speeches that abolitionists saw him as their flag-bearer, now he seems to be more concilitory than he really feels. No wonder neither side were convinced.

MABEL: I'm confused about their financial status, too. Since Lincoln always traveled so simply and dressed so poorly, I think of them as still scraping along. But he was the kind of person who would have always done that.

I have heard comments to the effect that Mary was a shopaholic. If so, whatever their budget was, she would have stretched it, and been limited.

What if the South had seceded, and the North had done nothing -- let them go? What would have happened then?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 22, 2009, 09:42:56 PM
I don't know why I've always been fascinated by the Civil War. Maybe because, growing up in Washington DC, I always felt surrounded by it. As a young adult, I visited all the nearby battlefields, famous and obscure, and could have told you (then, not now) how each battle worked out. Whereas I found out by accident that two places I had lived had had signifigant battles in the Revolution, and I had had no idea!

But I don't think I'm alone. This war and period has a unique fascination for many. Do any of you feel it?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 22, 2009, 09:51:25 PM
The Book Club Online  is  the oldest  continuing book club on the Internet, begun in 1996, open to everyone.  We offer cordial discussions of one book a month,  24/7 and  enjoy the company of readers from all over the world.  Everyone is welcome to join in.

Team of Rivals
by
Doris Kearns Goodwin

(http://seniorlearn.org/bookclubs/teamofrivals/teamcvr.jpg)                         

"More books about Abraham Lincoln line the shelves of libraries than about any other American. Can there be anything new to say about our 16th president? Surprisingly, the answer is yes. - ..... Doris Kearns Goodwin has written an elegant, incisive study of Lincoln......." - New York Times

The Team:
William H. Seward
Salmon P. Chase
Edward Bates
.........     Links:
NPR Review (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4989622)
Wilmot Proviso (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilmot_Proviso)
Dred Scott Decision (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford)
Kansas-Nebraska Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas-Nebraska_Act)
Fugitive Slave Law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Slave_Law_of_1850)
March 15 -Chapters 8-11
March 22 - Chapters 12-15
.........March 29 - Chapters 16-19
April 5 -      Chapters 20-23
April 12 -    Chapters 24 -26

To Consider in Chapters 16-20

1.  Lincoln has been criticized for firing General McClellan.  Was he right to do so?  Would you have waited longer for results

2.  Can a President have political friends while in office?  Can he have friends in the community?

3.  Congress, or the Republican majority in Congress, passed the Homestead Act, the Morrill Act,  the Pacific Railroad Act, and the Legal Tender bill.  Were all these bills helpful to the country?  What did they accomplish?

4/  What were the circumstances that forced Lincoln to issue the Emancipation Proclamation?  Why did he do it at this time and what did it accomplish? 

5.  How did Chase, Seward and Bates react to the proclamation?

6.  Lincoln’s proposal that the freed slaves form a colony in another country was outrageous.
How could a man with such acuity be so wrong in his view on African Americans? 

7.  Newspapers were paramount in communication in the 19th and 20th centuries.  Will they survive in the 21st?

8.  As Lincoln said “In great contests, each party claims to act in accordance with the will of God.  Both may be and one must be wrong.  God can not be for and against the same thing at the same time.”  What are your thoughts on the subject?

9.  Seward said “What is the use of growing old.  You learn something of men and things but never until too late to use it.”  (pg.480)   What are your thoughts?

10.  Seward was the scapegoat for the defeat at Fredericksburg.  Why? 

11.  What was the purpose of the Committee of Nine?

12.  What is the meaning of the phrase “fire in the rear.”

13.  Of all the men Lincoln associated with, whom would you most like to get to know or read his autobiography?

14.  What did Chase, Seward and Bates contribute to the war effort?
 

Discussion Leaders:
Ella (egibbons28@columbus.rr.com) & PatH (rjhighet@earthlink.net)




Saved for heading
Thanks, Joan
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 23, 2009, 11:58:03 AM
NEW QUESTIONS ARE UP FOR US TO CONSIDER!

MYSTIC CHORDS OF MEMORY.  mystic="mysteriously symbolic; inspiring a sense of mystery and wonder." (American Heritage Dictionary) 

Goodwin's title for Chapter 12.  Obviously (or was it?) she was referring to President Lincoln.  And he is ensconced at the Willard awaiting his inauguration.  Remember for awhile, the nation wasn't sure where Obama was going to reside in Washington before the inauguration; ss I heard that a Middle Eastern businessman had booked Blair House, did you hear that also?

The Blair family is very much in evidence in the book, see this site:

http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/travel/wash/dc25.htm

The house doesn't look very stately on the ouside, does it? 

I am struck on the very first page (323) at the sentence that Lincoln would reduce complex ideas to paragraphs and sentences as I am in awe of Obama (mystic Obama?) being able to speak on so many complex issues facing the nation, knowing that every word is being scrutinized by upteen hundreds of media of all kinds.  He does make generalized statements, but then I wouldn't even attempt those would you?


Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 23, 2009, 12:20:36 PM
Jean, you set a fine example in questioning the things you read and hear. Things don't always add up. I enjoyed this from your post, #157:

"
I remember hearing some L expert talk about the fact that L was the atty for one of the railroads and made very good money and was one of the wealthiest men in Illinois at the time."

The wealth hardly shows up in the Lincolns' modest life style. Their home seems substantial, but hardly impressive. Are there any facts regarding Lincoln's actual income? Being described as a railway attorney doesn't tell us very much. I doubt if he could be thought of as a corporate lawyer, as for example Edwin Stanton, the NY attorney, and future Sec. of War. More likely that he acted on behalf of railways in some of the countless little lawsuits as the railways laid their tracks across the countryside.

We got a pretty good impression of how meanly Lincoln was regarded by the country's preeminent lawyers in the McCormick 'Reaper' case, to be tried in Chicago. He was brought into the case by the NY lawyers who felt that

'Since the case was to be tried before a judge in Chicago, (it was decided to) to engage a local lawyer who "understood the judge and had his confidence," page173

It was cruel to see Lincoln dumped when the case was tried in Cincinnati. Stanton snubbed Lincoln, but nevertheless so impressed him that it earned him Lincoln's confidence and eventually a place in Lincoln's administration.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 23, 2009, 12:20:46 PM
Remember for awhile, the nation wasn't sure where Obama was going to reside in Washington before the inauguration;  I heard that a Middle Eastern businessman had booked Blair House, did you hear that also?



The house doesn't look very stately on the ouside, does it? 

That incident made a big flap here, where we take our political celebrities very seriously.  Blair House is used for official purposes, and can't be "booked" by private individuals.  Obama requested that he and his family stay there before the Inauguration--a common thing to happen.  Bush regretted that the house had already been committed.  It turned out, that the only person who would be staying there was one lone Australian official, here for some conference.  Since the adjacent houses have been combined on the inside with Blair house, and there are dozens of bedrooms and separate suites, it does seem like something could have been worked out.  The Obamas stayed at the Hay-Adams, at considerable expense.

That picture doesn't do it justice.  It looks quite elegant.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 23, 2009, 12:33:18 PM
Stanton snubbed Lincoln, but nevertheless so impressed him that it earned him Lincoln's confidence and eventually a place in Lincoln's administration.
Jonathan, that's a good example of Lincoln's rare gift of not letting personal slights get in the way and not holding grudges.  Stanton's firm did pay Lincoln, though.  Lincoln sent the check back, saying he hadn't done anything to earn it, but when the firm sent it again, he cashed it.

Stanton hesitated to take the offered position of secretary of war because it would mean a reduction of income from $50,000 to $8000. (p 410)

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 23, 2009, 12:42:34 PM
JONATHAN AND JEAN  -  an interesting speculation.  I don't know how much Lincoln was worth at his death; I do know that during his lifetime it was certainly not enough to keep up with Mary's debts.   I wonder how much presidents were paid in those days (and you would have to compare the figure to that of today's salary of $400,000 - I think it is). 

LUCKY made this statement:  "Historians believe that if the English had come to the aid of the south, the south would have been the victor."   There are probably many reasons why they didn't, although the Confederacy believed they would or expected they would.  England had outlawed slavery in their country long before the Civil War and did not believe they should support it in America and  the Northern blockade of their ports was another reason.  I'm sure there are others.

LUCKY also posted about Lincoln's attitude toward the slaves which is ignored too often probably, due to the Emancipation Proclamation.  That was a good post, LUCKY, thank you. 


Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 24, 2009, 10:37:07 AM
INAUGURATION DAY, 1860.  On this day the Washington Monument was only one third of the way to its height, the new Capitol dome two years away from completion and most of the streets unpaved,  and 52-year-old Lincoln appeared  in a new black suit and top hat and stated his ongoing propositions that, in summary:

1)  he will not interfere with the institution of slavery where it exists;

2)  the Fugitive Slave Law will continue to be enforced;

3)  he will continue to support an "unbroken Union" stating "we cannot separate"

Closing with the lovely statement “the mystic chords of memory….will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely as they will be, by the better angels of our nature."  Pure poetry.

The country was only 84 years old.  Today it is only 233 years old.  We are so very young I think, do you agree?  At an age when people are living into the nineties,  it is roughly 3 generations ago.  That doesn’t seem right, but…………..

One man. who lives on in history, was sorely troubled by Lincoln’s statements.  Frederick Douglas, a former slave, an author of a autobiography,  believed that Lincoln had "groveled” before the foul and withering curse of slavey"  We will read more of him later.

ISN’T SEWARD AN INTERESTING CHARACTER!  He’s so thunderous! 

Another character introduced is Charles Francis Adams, Jr. -  a great grandson of John Adams.  See

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Francis_Adams,_Jr.

----------------------




Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 24, 2009, 10:42:45 AM
NOW WE MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS NO. 1 above.  Anyone? 
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 25, 2009, 10:31:00 AM
IS EVERYBODY ON SPRING BREAK?  WHERE ARE YOU ALL?

As this is a political, albeit historical, discussion I think it is okay to just say what I thought of our president's press conference last night.  He reminded me a bit of Teddy Roosevelt, who was fearless taking on the huge corporations of his day.  Obama is going to take on the Pentagon, Medicare, Congress, lobbyists - fearless!  No guarantee that anything is going to work but isn't he confident?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 25, 2009, 11:25:52 AM
Now, when it seems imminent, with his southern senate colleagues packing up and saying goodbye, Seward becomes conciliatory and influential with Lincoln to be likewise in his inaugural address. The first attempt by Seward to determine Lincoln's course of action. Seward loved his Union as much as Lincoln, but it wasn't Seward who was about to take the oath to preserve it. An oath is a pretty grim business.
(I added emphasis here by putting your sentence in bold.)

Seward suggested a number of good changes to the speech, most of which Lincoln made.  At this point he still thought he was the better man and would be the power behind the throne.  On p. 326 Goodwin quotes Seward saying bitterly he "...had to stand aside and see it (the nomination) given to a little Illinois lawyer."

He soon started to learn differently.  He was in favor of evacuating Fort Sumter, and, assuming he was "the power behind a weak president", thought this was what Lincoln would do.  Lincoln's decision to reinforce the fort horrified him, but his attempts to take over policy met with a firm stone wall.  "..if this must be done, I must do it" Lincoln, p. 343.

Gradually Seward came to recognize Lincoln's quality and firmness, and the relationship settled down in the way Lincoln had hoped--Seward still expressed opposing views when he had them, and argued with Lincoln, but he knew that ultimately all decisions were Lincoln's, and even realized that Lincoln was the better man.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 25, 2009, 11:58:19 AM
Hello Pat.  Well, while we wait for the others to post shall you and I talk?  ]"Lincoln's quality and firmness."   Good traits in a president, right! 

While the cabinet dilliad and dallied (sp?) Lincoln had decided to fortify Fort Sumter knowing that this would, no doubt, provoke the southern states to secede. All the cabinet agreed with his decision except Seward and one other member.  Later Lincoln said of this decision "of all the trials I have had since I came here, none begin to compare with those I had between the inauguration and the fall of Fort Sumter."

Seward, although all agreed he was the one person who had Lincoln's ear, continued to oppose the decision to fortify Fort Sumter and proceeded to attempt to involve foreign nations in the affairs of the nation.  I had to smile at this statement he made:  "there was no great difference between an elected president of the United States and an hereditary monarch.  Neither truly run things.  The actual direction of public affairs belongs to the leader of the ruling party."  (pg.342)

And a president has tried, and is trying, to fight Congress from the beginning of our republic.  Such is democracy!
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 25, 2009, 12:19:49 PM
What a challenge for a new president. 'With no idea if anything is going to work.' It certainly does invite comparisons with Lincoln's situation when all the uncertainties over secession were brought to a head the day after his inauguration with Fort Sumter.

'Later he confessed "of all the trials I have had since I came here, none begins to compare with those I had between the inauguration and the fall of Fort Sumter. They were so great that could I have anticipated them, I would not have believed it possible to survive them." ' p340

1.  Could Lincoln have avoided war by giving in to the South’s demands?

It seems to me Lincoln had gone as far as he could in reaching out to the South without risking his support in the North. Besides he was just as disappointed as anyone over what the South had got with the Dred Scott decision. We're told that Lincoln was dismayed by the role of the SC in the slavery issue, losing faith in the judicial branch of the government. Doesn't that sound familiar?

What a lot of political considerations Lincoln had to balance in deciding on a course of action with Fort Sumter, not the least of which were those which might affect the affiliations of the uncommitted southern states, as well as the border states.

DKG tells us:

'Critics later claimed that Lincoln had maneuvered the South into beginning the war.' p346

Perhaps. One should expect him to make some calculated moves. It must have been a relief to call out the 75,000 miliatia men with his call to arms.

Frances Seward plays a curious role in the crisis. She preferred Auburn to Washington. Seward did prefer her to stay away, since

'...he knew they (colleagues and president) would argue about the purpose of the war.' 356

Frances, we've been told, was on the war path, writing her husband that:

'God has heard the prayer of the oppressed and a fearful retribution awaits the oppressors.' p356

Lincoln chose to see the coming conflict as 'the battle to save the Union.' 'An even larger purpose than ending slavery.'

'I consider the central idea pervading this struggle is the necessity that is upon us, of proving that popular government is not an absurdity...if we fail it will go far to prove the incapability of the people to govern themselves.' 356

That was statesmanship and good politics.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 25, 2009, 02:48:41 PM
Hi Jonathan!

Isn't this a confusing situation to post about?  So much happened in the days right before and after Lincoln's inauguration, enough to make an ordinary person dizzy and open a few  antidepressant bottles!  Good thing Lincoln was no ordinary person; even though he said he was unable to sleep well!

How to save the country!  Not an enemy on our shores, but our own countrymen!

Even Washington had urged to be aware of "the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts."

Those framers of the Consitution tried to envision everything, didn't they?

I don't know how Lincoln could have avoided war either?  A Peace Conference was called that attempted to avoid it; it's a very complicated situation and historians have argued this point for decades.  Just read this, which is  a sample, and you understand a little of why there are so many books written about Lincoln:

http://www.tulane.edu/~sumter/Reflections/Reflections_intro.html
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 25, 2009, 02:59:41 PM
Regarding Fort Sumter and the responsibility for the Civil War: (quoting from the above source)

"The most intense debate has focused on Lincoln, some of whose critics at the time, as well as later, held him responsible for the war and contended that he deliberately provoked the South into firing on Fort Sumter. In their view, Lincoln deliberately and disingenuously fixed the onus for starting the war on the Confederacy. To be sure, scholars have also investigated the Confederate government, and some hold it accountable for the fighting. But it is Lincoln's decisions and motives that have been most closely scrutinized.

Lincoln was not the first, or last, President to be accused of acting deceitfully and provocatively in order to advance broader military or political objectives. In an earlier period, President James K. Polk was charged by opponents, including Lincoln himself, with initiating the Mexican War by sending American troops into disputed territory. In more recent American history, some critics assailed Franklin D. Roosevelt for maneuvering the United States into World War II, and Lyndon B. Johnson was alleged to have used an ambiguous incident in the Tonkin Gulf to widen the Viet Nam War.

The controversy over who was responsible for the "first shot" of the Civil War raises substantial moral and political issues. Americans have long and proudly considered themselves a peaceable people, who repel aggression but do not initiate war. Fortunate circumstances, including isolation from Europe and the presence of few and weak neighbors, partly explain the existence of the idea of America as a peaceful oasis in a contentious world"


Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 25, 2009, 03:57:43 PM
At this point, I don't see how Lincoln could have saved the union. Every attempt at conciliation had been met by anger from the South. His only choices were to fight, or let the south secede and become a separate country without fighting. As PatH pointed out in conversation one day, that might have avoided war if the country had been fully settled, but there was bound to be conflict over which "state" the territories would join. Perhaps it would have been endless fighting at the border, like India and Pakistan. I don't see any way this could have ended well.

What could have happened better, I think, was this: the wear could have ended more quickly with much less loss of life. Basically, the Union was much stronger than the Confederacy, and should have been able to win quicker and more decisively IMO. Several things stood in the way of this: McClellen's reluctance to fight and Lee's skill.

In addition, this was the (or one of the) first wars fought with really effective guns and artillary. The Union generals often didn't appreciate the changes this should have made in strategy, and tried to fight in the old way: lining up on two sides and charging. This necessarily led to a huge loss of life, as whole armies were just mowed down (as in Pickett's charge at Gettysburg).

Anyway, those are my opinions.

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 25, 2009, 04:32:50 PM
I've been on a roller-coaster of feelings about Seward. During the Cabinet process i had decided that he was so self-centered that i would take back my offer of marriage to him that i proffered to Ella's first question of the discussion.... LOL. ....But he settles down and becomes a rational human being, as Pat mentioned.

We see that newspapers were no more kind to AL in analyzing his speeches than they have been to recent presidents. One of my favorite reasons for studying history is that we don't need to get too excited and exercised about events of today, thinking they are unique, because we can know that the behaviors are not new. There seem to be behaviors that are just apart of the human condition and they keep appearing over and over as we look at history. That gives me both solace and depression. Solace that things are not more terrible than they have ever been and depression that we never seem to solve many problems, or that humans are always going to behave in similar ways, no matter what period of time, or what society/govt tries to do about them.

Pres Obama must have been relieved when reading TofR to know that he would not have hoards of people standing in the halls of the WH assaulting him as he walked thru as AL did. CAn you imagine?

Q#5 - i knew that AL suspended the writ of habeas corpus, so i was not surprised, but it is an issue that has bothered me since i learned about it, years ago. AL and the capitol were in much more serious danger than the gov't  had ever been, so i can understand his reasoning, but i think it was a bad precedent that, as we have recently seen, can now be used by presidents. He, of course, may not have given that much tho't at the time, thinking that his priority of saving the Union was more important than following the constitution - but -  that's the rationale used by the Cheney/Bush admin under much less dire circumstances IMO. I am amazed by conservatives who generally stand up for the strict adherance to the constituion, who supported the B/C decision on that issue. I wonder what BArry Goldwater would have said to GWB. Do any of you know if Buckley had made any comment about it? .........................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 26, 2009, 03:43:40 PM
Jean, I, too, was much bothered by Lincoln's suspension of Habeas Corpus, albeit under somewhat limited circumstances.  Do you know if the power was actually used to any extent?
He, of course, may not have given that much tho't at the time, thinking that his priority of saving the Union was more important than following the constitution
The fact that he wasn't following the Constitution shows how seriously Lincoln took the threat.  All through the book, we have seen Lincoln regarding the Constitution as not quite sacred, but almost so, the most important document our country has, only to be changed by lawful process and to be followed scrupulously.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 26, 2009, 05:35:09 PM
In fact, almost everything Lincoln has done so far goes back to this.  The Constitution is the great document that shaped a bold new experiment--representative government, in which everyone has the chance to make what he can of himself (at least if he's male).  If the Union splits, this type of government is a failure.  If it can split once, it will do so again, and it means that men aren't capable of governing themselves by this system.

The minor motive in some of his actions is his firm determination to keep the commitments he feels bound to, either by the party platform or his own promises.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 26, 2009, 05:46:23 PM
The events in this section gave rise to the Maryland State Song, though it wasn't adopted until 1939.

"The nine-stanza poem, "Maryland, My Maryland," was written by James Ryder Randall in April 1861. A native of Maryland, Randall was teaching in Louisiana in the early days of the Civil War, and he was outraged at the news of Union troops being marched through Baltimore. The poem articulated Randall's Confederate sympathies. Set to the traditional tune of "Lauriger Horatius" ("O, Tannenbaum"), the song achieved wide popularity in Maryland and throughout the South." (quote from the link below)

It's awful doggerel, and singing it to Tannenbaum doesn't make it any better, but I'm amused that my state song calls for revolt against the government.  Here's a bit of it.  The "despot" is Abraham Lincoln.

I
The despot's heel is on thy shore,
    Maryland!
    His torch is at thy temple door,
    Maryland!
    Avenge the patriotic gore
    That flecked the streets of Baltimore,
    And be the battle queen of yore,
    Maryland! My Maryland! 

    IX
    I hear the distant thunder-hum,
    Maryland!
    The Old Line's bugle, fife, and drum,
    Maryland!
    She is not dead, nor deaf, nor dumb-
    Huzza! she spurns the Northern scum!
    She breathes! she burns! she'll come! she'll come!
    Maryland! My Maryland!

Here's the link:

http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/01glance/html/symbols/lyricsco.html (http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/01glance/html/symbols/lyricsco.html)
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 26, 2009, 06:55:51 PM
HELLO EVERYBODY

I have had company from California for two days and am all tuckered out.  Will be back later.  Love reading your posts about these chapers. 

You can understand how so many books have been written about Lincoln; one controversial situation after another; one decision after another. 

Here is the short version of the "habeas corpus" question and how it was restored after the War.  I agree that Bush/Cheney did the same and history will write about it also.  Obama says he is attempting to right the wrongs, only time will tell.

http://www.civil-liberties.com/pages/did_lincoln.htm

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 27, 2009, 09:46:37 AM
"There seem to be behaviors that are just apart of the human condition and they keep appearing over and over as we look at history.

"Lincoln was not the first, or last, President to be accused of acting deceitfully and provocatively in order to advance broader military or political objectives"

Thanks for your posts!  History, always fascinating, and yet ever new!

8. At the start of the war, Lincoln was plagued with a series of ineffective generals.  Was this inevitable?

Hasn't it always been?  I am not a student of the military, past or present, but it seems that those in power, be it presidents or Joint Chiefs of Staff, do need time to evaluate a military leaders effectiveness on the battlefield.  Education, personal confidence, and social connections (McClellan) is not enough to make a good leader.  Perhaps we can read a biography in the future of a good general in the Civil War. Grant?  Sherman? 

Grant is further explored in our next chapters.  Wasn't that awful for McClellan to snub President Lincoln when he came to visit him? (pg. 379)  That could never, never happen today.  And even after the president came to McClellan's own headquarters in a luxurious home!

10. So far, Lincoln is still insisting that the war is about preserving the Union, and not about slavery.  What do you think?
I have always felt, and still do, that Lincoln's main objective in the Civil War, no matter who was at fault, how it started, the terrible casualties, was his determination to save the Union.  He had the vision of what we were to become and what we are.  Regardles of whether we want the position or not, we are today the world's leader.  Heaven help us!

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 27, 2009, 09:52:13 AM
Goodwin's book loses its focus, somehow, in attempting to discuss Lincoln's rivals, Bates, Chase and Seward.

LINCOLN DOMINATES!

Do you agree?  Was this her attempt to write something "new" about the period?  Is it successful?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 27, 2009, 12:40:26 PM
Pat - that's amazing that Maryland made O Maryland their state song in 1939 w/ those lyrics a part of it. I guess they were still angry at the yankees! It's amazing to me how much animus still exists against the north by some southerners.

I'm so disappointed in the Dems for not challenging the Bush/Cheney admin on a number of issues, but after seeing the Taney decision about only Congress being able to suspend the writ of habeas corpus, i'm even more perturbed w/ them.

It's a good thing that Stephen Douglas was not elected president. I didn't kn ow about him being sick and dying in what would have been early in his term as president. How much chaos could have ensued from that?

These are all little-bitty comments, not related to the big issues, but they struck me as i read: what the heck is a Picayune and why is the New Orleans paper titled such? ........Is the Willie Taft who played w/ the Lincoln boys the eventual Pres Taft? .....................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 27, 2009, 06:26:19 PM
Hello JEAN!

My itty-bitty comments:  Perhaps Obama's statement that he did not want to pursue anything in the past but only to look forward is responsible for the lack of challenges to anything the former president did or did not do.   This suspension of the writ of habeas corpus is a thorny issue, what do you think is the right thing to do in time of war?

I don't know if the Taft playmate in the book is part of the Taft dynasty or not, I tried to go to Google and my computer got stuck at some site and I had to turn it off; don't care to try again.  I do know that the Taft family is a dynamic one in Ohio.  The Taft Broadcasting Company of Cincinnati, Ohio was a powerhouse in radio for years and the family produced a governor and a president that I know of.

We haven't said too much about the ladies in the book but Mary Lincoln redecorating the White House in time of war was ridiculous.  She should have had better sense and Lincoln was at fault for not stopping it.  I don't think I would have liked her at all, do you? 

It is difficult today to read about such ignorance - "The White House drew its water supply from the Potomac Rive, along the banks of which tens of thousands of troops without proper latrines were stationed."  The symptoms the boys encountered all bear witness to the bacteria that they ingested.

Grief affects people differently, we all know that.  Poor Lincoln with his conscience already overburdened with the guilt for sending young boys into the hell that was the battlefield, had to carry on.
 
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 27, 2009, 07:20:12 PM
I had the same thought about the Taft boys.  It turns out that President Taft was born Sept 15, 1857, so he was too young, but it could be the same extended family.

Jean, I'm surprised about the MD state song too.  The only explanation I can think of is that most people pay no attention whatever to state songs, so it was easy to get it through.

Pop quiz (joke): what do any of you know about the state song of the state in which you are living?

See what I mean?  I only know Maryland's song because I have a taste for the bizarre, and when my children had to take the supremely boring Maryland State History in fourth grade it caught my attention.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 27, 2009, 10:00:02 PM
'This suspension of the writ of habeas corpus is a thorny issue, what do you think is the right thing to do in time of war?'

I hear what you're saying, Ella. And also have read with interest what Jean and Pat have posted. I'm of the opinion that Lincoln was justified in the action, and had the constitutional authority.

U.S. Consitution: Article I, Section 9. 'The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases  of rebellion of invasion the public safety may require it.'

A pretty good case can be made for suspension, given the circumstances. Washington was undefended, and the enemy seemed everywhere. The continuity of the federal government was threatened. Why shouldn't the president take action as chief executive? Why Congress? Because CJ Taney said so? After his Dred Scott decision who could trust his judgement. With his Southern sympathies. But Taney died not too long after, and Lincoln could get his own people on  the bench. Rival Chase as Chief Justice, who left the suspension in place until after the war, and, this one surprised me, Lincoln appointed his 1860 campaign manager, and circuit judge, David Davis, to the Supreme Court.

All the talk of the throngs of office-seekers taking up so much of the president's time seems curious to me. Do you think he needed these people around him? Drew strength from them?

I'm enjoying Goodwin's narrative style more all the time. Life went on, with Mary decorating the neglected White House, and Ellen McClellan reading the latest letter from her bragging husband. All we know about him is what he himself tells us. What he did in scorning the president, and his gratuitous opinions of that grand old soldier, Winfield Scott, were disgraceful. But then he wanted to replace both of them.A very ambitious man. But so were they all. McClellan chose not to risk everything on the battlefield. Given the nature of warfare, his inaction saved many lives.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 28, 2009, 11:15:14 AM
HAHAAAAA, PAT!  I had to smile at the pop quiz.  I never even knew about state songs, we live in the Ohio State University campus area and everyone, EVERYONE, sings their songs - Snoopy, Snoopy, Hang On -   Fight the Team across the field, show them Ohio's here, etc.

Anyway, JONATHAN, your thought that McClellan's inaction saving many lives gave me pause, as apparently Lincoln didn't think so.  I must go back to the book where it talks about the man and read up on it. There is so much, so many details here, that we could almost discuss the book page-by-page.

Those office seekers around Lincoln!  He should have stopped them in my opinion, perhaps he didn't know how to say No????  Did he have a chief of staff like the presidents today have - I think he keeps all the "unwanteds" away, and I think that Obama brought many of his campaign staffers to the White House.  Here again, I must think  - who was his campaign manager and where is he?  Was it Ram (sp?) Emanuel?  And isn't he his chief-of-staff now?

Do help me out someone!

Back later................ 
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 28, 2009, 10:17:07 PM
I hasten to correct myself:

Rahm Emanuel, who served as a policy aide in the Clinton White House before running for Congress, told media outlets Wednesday that he had to take time to weigh family and political considerations before accepting. He will have to relinquish his position in the House Democratic leadership and put aside hopes of becoming House speaker.  He was named Chief of Staff.

The first 100 days has become a test for presidents.  It was not in Lincoln's administration but I have a feeling he would have passed with A+

I think it was very interesting that the "war" was not on people's minds when Obama took office.    Click here for the first 100 days interviews of Obama's presidency:

http://usnews.feedroom.com/?fr_story=992a02fa8da6e49ac8b715e4103e51b75454fb7a





Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 29, 2009, 11:59:44 AM
'Was this her (Goodwin's) attempt to write something "new" about the period?  Is it successful?'

Yes, very successful, in my opinion. I feel overwhelmed, since taking up her book,  by the complexity of the subject. The great historical event, America's Civil War, and the strange career of the man who managed to get himself center stage. Every book on the subject now catches my eye. Every aspect of the conflict and Lincoln's role in it seems to be written about, and still it seems to remain the happy hunting ground for another book, or a doctoral thesis. I've looked at quite a few, but it's always good to get back to Goodwin. I believe she does hit all the bases, regarding issues and and successfully places Lincoln at the center of events. The rivals play their parts, but there's no question about who is in the starring role.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 29, 2009, 01:33:28 PM
Big surprise for me last night when i read about James Mason being captured and imprisoned. There is a college in Va w/ his name. I went to look at their website to see if it was really the same guy..........................they don't mention their namesake at ALL! ...........not surprising........ I would call him a traitor to the Union. He wrote the Fugitive Slave Act, not something that would be looked on w/ favor at the present time. He also fled to Canada after the Civil War. I suppose he was in danger of prosecution by the Union, but he returned to Alexandria Va later in the century..............this info is from a bio page on him, not from the college site. The college was founded in 1908, i guess he was still a Confederate hero at that point...................i wander how many Black students they have at the college and if they know about James?.................TIC..........jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 30, 2009, 12:10:47 PM
One of our PBS stations broadcast "Looking for Lincoln" last night. It is excellent, if you get a chance to see it, take a look. "Skip" Gates is the narrator, DKG is one of the commentators, Bill Clinton and Geo W. Bush have interesting comments and sev'l historians comment.

One of the writers, i believe it was James Horton, asked a good question: Which one of the possibilities would you have wanted to be the president other than AL? Is there one who would have done a better job? He said it implying that the answer to the last question was "no."

One of the segments was at a "Confederate" convention. In a previous post i commented that some Southerners still had confederate sympathies in 1908, but what a surprise! They still dislike Lincoln in 2009! One man said AL had done nothing  positive and that he was a traitor! I think he forgot that the Union was the  country and the South was the part that seceeded. ...................... I am constantly amazed at how two individuals can see an event in completely different perspectives. ............ jean

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 30, 2009, 01:28:03 PM
I am constantly amazed at how two individuals can see an event in completely different perspectives. ............ jean

I agree, though I'm sure that the people attending a "Confederate" convention would be at the extreme end of the range.

Jean, where in Virginia is James Mason college?  I can't seem to locate it.  It's hard even to find the historical man James Mason without getting swamped by the actor.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 30, 2009, 01:54:48 PM
Lincoln offered the command of the Union forces to Robert E. Lee.  Lee refused, and resigned his commission because he felt too much loyalty to his native Virginia to fight against it.  Presumably this decision was disastrous for the South, since his good generalship enabled them to hold out much longer, with many more casualties and much more destruction, though it still wasn't likely that the South could win--they were too outnumbered.

Southern friends tell me that Lee foresaw the consequence of his choice from the start--that the requirements of his personal honor would destroy his beloved homeland--but still felt it was the only thing he could do.  I tried to find some evidence for this and couldn't.  My ability for historical research isn't that good though.  Does anyone else know anything about it?

I did find this lengthy but interesting article about his decision process

http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/2008/3/2008_3_18.shtml (http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/2008/3/2008_3_18.shtml)

which shows how complex and painful it was for him.  And of course by the end of the war he knew perfectly well what his decision had meant.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: ANNIE on March 30, 2009, 02:25:33 PM
PatH,
Did you get my email about Ella??? Her hard drive has a problem and she has taken her computer to Best Buy for repair.  She is hoping to be back soon with lots of questions but hopes you will be here with more of your own until she returns.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 30, 2009, 03:07:41 PM
Good thing you said that, Annie, I hadn't checked my mail in the last half hour.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 30, 2009, 04:56:54 PM
I heard a wrinkle on Lincoln's suspension of Habius corpus, don't remember the source so don't know if it's accurate.

According to this, the impetus for the suspension was the issue of whether Maryland wouls secede or join the Union. This was critical, since Washington lies between Maryland and Virginia. If Maryland had seceded, at worst the government, including Lincoln, would have been captured. At best, some would have escaped and had to scramble together another government in Philly or NY, w/o facilities, files, equipment, etc.

Maryland was due to vote on the issue, and Lincoln knew that the secessionists had the majority. So (I think it said the night before), he suspende habeas corpus and arrested all the South-leaning congressmen. After the vote to remain in the union, he released them.

If this is true, was he justified?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on March 30, 2009, 05:02:45 PM
ELLA: on state songs: I don't know the state song of Ohio, but it stuck in my memory that my daughter had a school assignment to study Ohio, and she told me that the Ohio wtate drink is tomato juice. I can just imagine circumstances where that might be proposed and passed!
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 30, 2009, 06:14:36 PM
I'm back.  Rather expensive when your hard drive dies, isn't it?  And when you are addicted to the Internet and email as I am.  But it's all great fun.  I'll be reading the posts I missed and catching up tonight and tomorrow!
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 31, 2009, 09:48:35 AM
WE HAVE A NEW WEEK, NEW CHAPTERS TO BE DISCUSSED AND NEW QUESTIONS IN THE HEADING TO HELP US IN OUR DISCUSSION

Are there any interested parties out there waiting for the discussion this week?  Please post! 

We need your input!

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on March 31, 2009, 09:57:58 AM
Poor President Lincoln.  As I read these chapters I feel very sorry for the man who did not know that he would be the leader of a country that was splitting in two, almost as easily as those rails he used to split.

Nor could he have known that he would lose a beloved son while President.  Life is difficult sometimes for all of us to endure, but some get a bigger dose.

He is faced with the problems of not only getting his cabinet together, his administration officials appointed, but now he must handle generals and a gathering storm! 
 
And "the bottom is out of the tub!"

Lincoln had no military training and McClellan assured him that this should give no problems.  That he, McClellan,  would take care of it all.  Should he have immediately sensed trouble?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 31, 2009, 04:54:58 PM
The Book Club Online  is  the oldest  continuing book club on the Internet, begun in 1996, open to everyone.  We offer cordial discussions of one book a month,  24/7 and  enjoy the company of readers from all over the world.  Everyone is welcome to join in.

Team of Rivals
by
Doris Kearns Goodwin

(http://seniorlearn.org/bookclubs/teamofrivals/teamcvr.jpg)                         

"More books about Abraham Lincoln line the shelves of libraries than about any other American. Can there be anything new to say about our 16th president? Surprisingly, the answer is yes. - ..... Doris Kearns Goodwin has written an elegant, incisive study of Lincoln......." - New York Times

The Team:
William H. Seward
Salmon P. Chase
Edward Bates
.........     Links:
NPR Review (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4989622)
Wilmot Proviso (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilmot_Proviso)
Dred Scott Decision (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford)
Kansas-Nebraska Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas-Nebraska_Act)
Fugitive Slave Law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Slave_Law_of_1850)



Discussion Leaders:
Ella (egibbons28@columbus.rr.com) & PatH (rjhighet@earthlink.net)



I wondered where Ella was for a few days! Tho't maybe she was taking a spring break! .....lol................

PatH - James Mason U is in Harrisonburg, Va in the Shenandoah Valley. Yes, it did take some searching to get past James Mason the actor.

Joan - your info on AL's reasoning for suspending habeas corpus is the same story i have heard thru the yrs. I recognize that it was certainly sensible, it's just scary to consider how it can be used by other presidents who are not in as great a crisis. It's so fundamental to our system of justice.

From other sources, from my high school Amer hist course - my teacher was a huge CivWar buff, so we spent most of the yr on the CW - to my watching Ken Burns series on the CW, i had the  impression that McClellan's procrastination was much grtr than the impression DKG gives it in this book. The audacity of the man is spectacular. His hubris is so over the top and then he has a great capacity for self-righteousness. Sounds a bit like Dick Cheney, only McC's is in lacking activity rather than forcing activity as DC seems to do. Both men tho appear to have absolute faith in their being right!

Has anybody read a good bio on the Fremonts? It seems to me that i remember a few yrs ago of a new one. Of course, Irving STones' novel about them is wonderful and gives a different perspective on the behavior of J.C. and Jesse. Stone gives a courageous portrait of them both. I think Jesse Fremont is one of the more interesting women in Am history. Stone's portrayal of her trip across the isthmus of Panama is harrowing.

The Fremont crises gives us another picture of how difficult communication was before our present instant media. I'm always amazed at how much traveling people did when it was so difficult and time-consuming and there were no planes to jump on and to hop across the country/ocean and back.

[[color=blackI looked up picayune in Encarta: surprising
1. trifling: of very little importance

 
2. small-minded: tending to fuss about unimportant things and to be childishly spiteful

now why would a newspaper be given such a name???

I can't even comment on the grief of ML and AL. DKG lays it out so well.

A couple of you have commented about Goodwin's writing style. I first fell in love w/ it when reading No Ordinary Time - FDR & ER during the war years. She had so much detail in that book, but made it read like a novel, it was so interesing. At this time i am also reading The WAges of Fame, a novel by Tho Fleming about the Jacksonian era. It's interesting to read ToR and WoF at the same time because the writing is so similar. Of course, Fleming is also an historian, but has written many novels, including some for teens.

O.K. - that's enough for now, sorry to go on so long................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on March 31, 2009, 05:57:42 PM
Joan, that is a most interesting wrinkle on the habeas corpus business. Yes, I seem to remember reading about the imminent vote in Maryland that had Lincoln worried about a secessionist outcome. To prevent the legislators from convening and voting by arrest and detention, for political reasons, seems very un-Linconesque to me. That would make him a tyrant. Surely that wasn't the kind of Union he was trying to preserve. Then again, there were 4,000,000 slaves waiting for freedom and liberty. It seems like an irony to be overly concerned about the unlawful imprisonment of a few Marylanders for the duration.

So that's where Edmond Wilson got his title Patriotic Gore. From the Maryland state song. Very interesting.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on March 31, 2009, 09:02:52 PM
Jean: "From other sources,.......i had the  impression that McClellan's procrastination was much grtr than the impression DKG gives it in this book."

Good grief!  And here I was thinking that maybe DKG didn't care for McClellan and was laying it on a bit thick.  He must have been really intolerable.  Of course what's really unfair is that she quotes his own words.  ;) He was one of those people who is very sure of his own importance and, when things go wrong, it's always someone else's fault.

It surprises me that he was so popular with his troops.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on March 31, 2009, 10:56:50 PM
He was popular w/ his trps. I think he convinced them that he was looking out for them like a father. And it probably was nice to hear that in their circumstances. ............... jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 01, 2009, 07:55:30 AM
Come to think of it, if I were a soldier, maybe I wouldn't mind if my commander didn't want to send me into battle.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 01, 2009, 10:14:35 AM
The cottage on the grounds of the soldier's retirement home where Lincoln found a peaceful retreat during the summers has been restored to look the way it did then, and is now open to the public.  That "cottage" is a fair bit larger than my house.

http://www.lincolncottage.org/ (http://www.lincolncottage.org/)

The Soldiers Home is still functioning as it did then, as a retirement home for soldiers (airmen too, now) who are disabled or have 20 years service.  There's a waiting list--I wonder what your chances are of actually getting in.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 01, 2009, 10:37:05 AM
Then again, there were 4,000,000 slaves waiting for freedom and liberty. It seems like an irony to be overly concerned about the unlawful imprisonment of a few Marylanders for the duration.

Jonathan, the way I heard the story, he just locked them up for a little while, until Maryland had safely voted to stay in the Union.  I'd love to find some documentation for the story.  I heard it from my husband, who was a great Lincoln fan and had read a lot about him.  Goodwin doesn't mention it.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on April 01, 2009, 05:52:56 PM
It doesn't take much googling to realize what an issue Lincoln's use of habeas corpus still is. Still very controversial and hotly debated. Now, as well as then, in 1861, as the Civil War got underway. There were even those, I was surprised to read, who, as it was put:

'many Northern newspapers, including Horace Greeley's, which hoped for (Chief Justice) Taney's arrest.'

Someone asked, in a post, which of the main characters in this history  would make a good,  additional biographical read. I'm trying to decide between Kate Chase and Horace Greeley.

Pat, it's as you say, Goodwin doesn't mention it. The use of habeas corpus to prevent a secession vote in Maryland. I can only think that she didn't put much stock into it, and not that she was trying to spare Lincoln's reputation. She gives a reasonable view of why Lincoln availed himself of the measure, given the military emergency.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 01, 2009, 08:40:36 PM
Jonathan, I'm coming to realize what a strict constitutionalist Lincoln was, and I see how he justified the suspension of habeas corpus: "The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public safety may require it." (Constitution)  That's how he salved his conscience, but I still don't care for it.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 01, 2009, 09:11:26 PM
JONATHAN would like to read about Kate Chase and Horace Greeley!  Yes, so would I.  Also I want to know more about Seward, I would image there is a biography of him, don't you think?  And Montgomery Blair certainly deserves a biography, he and his family.  I'll have to do some digging, see what I can come up with.

These are so many fascinating people that Goodwin writes about; people we wouldn't have known about if we had not read the book and yet they impacted the time they lived in and Lincoln's administration.   I think Horace Greeley started THE NEW YORKER and perhaps we could find a history of that magazine and there he would be?  I've never subscribed; my nephew thinks I am don't keep up with the literary world because of this lack!

Wouldn't you say that Seward was possibly Lincoln's best friend in this period of his life?  They had difference but always came to an agreement and I remember reading about Seward's admiration for LIncoln.  Everyone associated with him had this same remarkable esteem for his character. 

And Obama seems to be engendering much of the same; stern when needed, charming when possible, using humor.

But do either Lincoln or any president have friendships while in office.  The kind of discussion where you are free to say anything on your mind with no fear of reprisal of any sort or being quoted and if your friend disagrees, you "have at it."   I don't know.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 01, 2009, 09:39:08 PM
But do either Lincoln or any president have friendships while in office.  The kind of discussion where you are free to say anything on your mind with no fear of reprisal of any sort or being quoted and if your friend disagrees, you "have at it."   I don't know.
I don't know either.  Lincoln seems to have approached it with Seward, though.  One thing that surprised me was his friendship with Cameron.  Lincoln only reluctantly made Cameron Secretary of War, and had to remove him because of his inefficiency and corruption.  But Lincoln generously made some face-saving concessions to Cameron, and C became "one of the most intimate and devoted of Lincoln's personal friends" (p 413).  Not what you'd expect, given Cameron's principles and Lincoln's rigid honesty.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 02, 2009, 03:00:27 PM
From other sources, from my high school Amer hist course - my teacher was a huge CivWar buff, so we spent most of the yr on the CW - to my watching Ken Burns series on the CW, i had the  impression that McClellan's procrastination was much grtr than the impression DKG gives it in this book.

I take that quote back.....................i hadn't read about the Pennisula Campaign when i wrote that and i had forgotten that it was the PC that agenerated the most procrastination. For some reason i had remembered it to have been the campaign in northern Va.

Jonathan and Pat - i think the First Lady has often had the role of the "friend" that presidents could be open with.  Apparently Mamie Eisenhower was not the least bit interested in anything political - but the Roosevelt FL's and everyone since Lady Bird, except maybe Pat Nixon, seems to have been very interested and  the sounding board for the President. They were sometimes the most honest about their responses also. Mary L seems to have had a varied experience in that role. Perhaps in their young married life and at the beginning of their WHouse life when she entertained politicains and seemed to enjoy it. But once her grieve overwhelmed her, i get the sense that she was not much interested in anything. He doesn't seem to have much trouble being open w/ a couple of these guys.  
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 02, 2009, 03:01:02 PM
From other sources, from my high school Amer hist course - my teacher was a huge CivWar buff, so we spent most of the yr on the CW - to my watching Ken Burns series on the CW, i had the  impression that McClellan's procrastination was much grtr than the impression DKG gives it in this book.

I take that quote back.....................i hadn't read about the Pennisula Campaign when i wrote that and i had forgotten that it was the PC that agenerated the most procrastination. For some reason i had remembered it to have been the campaign in northern Va.

Jonathan and Pat - i think the First Lady has often had the role of the "friend" that presidents could be open with.  Apparently Mamie Eisenhower was not the least bit interested in anything political - but the Roosevelt FL's and everyone since Lady Bird, except maybe Pat Nixon, seems to have been very interested and  the sounding board for the President. They were sometimes the most honest about their responses also. Mary L seems to have had a varied experience in that role. Perhaps in their young married life and at the beginning of their WHouse life when she entertained politicains and seemed to enjoy it. But once her grieve overwhelmed her, i get the sense that she was not much interested in anything. He doesn't seem to have much trouble being open w/ a couple of these guys.  
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 02, 2009, 03:01:32 PM
"From other sources, from my high school Amer hist course - my teacher was a huge CivWar buff, so we spent most of the yr on the CW - to my watching Ken Burns series on the CW, i had the  impression that McClellan's procrastination was much grtr than the impression DKG gives it in this book. "

I take that quote back.....................i hadn't read about the Pennisula Campaign when i wrote that and i had forgotten that it was the PC that agenerated the most procrastination. For some reason i had remembered it to have been the campaign in northern Va.

Jonathan and Pat - i think the First Lady has often had the role of the "friend" that presidents could be open with.  Apparently Mamie Eisenhower was not the least bit interested in anything political - but the Roosevelt FL's and everyone since Lady Bird, except maybe Pat Nixon, seems to have been very interested and  the sounding board for the President. They were sometimes the most honest about their responses also. Mary L seems to have had a varied experience in that role. Perhaps in their young married life and at the beginning of their WHouse life when she entertained politicains and seemed to enjoy it. But once her grieve overwhelmed her, i get the sense that she was not much interested in anything. He doesn't seem to have much trouble being open w/ a couple of these guys.  

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 02, 2009, 03:10:38 PM
Question #1 - would i have waited longer to fire McC -NO!

I worked for Dept of Army in the 80's and 90's and it just astonishes me how insubordinate he was. I wonder what Harry Truman had to say about McC. .......I am also surprised about the criticism of AL's policies/behaviors by the people around him. If you talk to people who work in D.C. today they are often very careful about what they are saying and who they are talking about and to whom they are talking. ................Now, some of DKG' s sources are the letters to families, which makes it more understandable, but not all of them. Maybe D.Cer's were not as sensitive, or as worried about their career  in the 19th century. ................... jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 02, 2009, 06:45:40 PM
"If you talk to people who work in D.C. today they are often very careful about what they are saying and who they are talking about and to whom they are talking. ................Now, some of DKG' s sources are the letters to families, which makes it more understandable, but not all of them."

That bad is it, JEAN!    Just in public, or in private homes?   Most of us here in the Midwest talk about these people openly, critically, or admiringly.

Women are sounding boards, Jean?  Are you saying that they are more to be trusted with gossip than the men in Washington?  Hahahaaaa

The Homestead Act of 1862, although a good idea, was a failed experiment by the government; it promoted corruption, land erosion by small farms causing the dust bowl, and, of course, we would not have had all those movies about cattle ranching and the farmers,  the latter  being of little substance, just my own speculation.

The Morrill Act of 1862  gave each state 30,000 acres of public land for each Senator and Representative. These numbers were based on the census of 1860.   The grant was a major force for higher education in America.

Good things to come out of the Civil War years.  Interesting that Congressmen had time to enact such laws in a time of peril for the country.

More to come.......

Some good laws by Congress, some not so good, but isn't it wonderful such a system of government.  I have always been in awe of the Consitution and the founders of our country.  I'm a patriot!!!

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on April 02, 2009, 07:23:36 PM
I was surprised to see that the first income tax law came out of the civil War.

On Lincoln and McClellan: I was surprised at the question. I would have thought that the question would be "did Lincoln wait to long to fire McClellan?" I think many other historians have thought so. It is possible to argue that if he had faught in situations where we now know he had a large numerical advantage, and advanced toward Richmond, that the war would have been shortened and much bloodshed and misery avoided.

Goodwin is much harsher on McClellan than any other historian I have read. They all agree that he was a bad fighter, but don't necessarily see him as a bad man. Goodwin backs up her assertions with quotes, but perhaps her picture is one-sided. Perhaps every historian finds characters that they can't stand, and with Goodwin, it seems to be McClellan. For others, it has been Mary Lincoln, but Goodwin treats her with respect and understanding.

I can understand why his men loved him. He was known for his skill in providing the equipment his soldiers needed in tough situations. Shortly after MC is gone, AL reviews the troups and finds them healthy, living comfortably, and even with new uniforms. He took good care of them.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on April 02, 2009, 07:34:13 PM
In a perverse way, the story of the suspension of habeus corpus gave me some confidence in our country. Yes, or president can take our liberties away FOR A WHILE. But once the initial fear had passed, the people came back and said NO! The same thing happened with the Alien and Sedition Act under Adams. He passed a law that anyone criticizing the government could be imprisoned. But the next president quickly repealed it.

"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty". Any government might do bad things, and it is our job as citizens to stand up over and over again and say "No". So far in America, we have done so. Some people think of their country as a parent, who is always right, no matter what. No, our copuntry is our child, and as parents, it is our job to correct it whenever it does wrong. Just as this produces a good child, it is the only way to have a good country.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 03, 2009, 10:25:59 AM
HI JOAN!

Another patriot and a fan of the wisdom of our founding fathers!  " No, our country is our child, and as parents, it is our job to correct it whenever it does wrong.  

I'm not sure how the Constitution is worded to give that impression of the parent/child, but we have it don't we?  Elections are one example, free speech, free press is another, etc. etc.  The Bill of Rights.  How fortunate we are!

Hindsight is easy!  Firing McClellan was not, he had many influential friends in Washington.  The example of Truman firing MacArthur comes to mind.  I have never read a biography of Truman, I know David McCullough wrote an excellent one and it was discussed on Seniornet but I was out of town at the time.  Both generals were popular with the Army and had excellent reputations.  What of the generals in Iraq before General Petraeus?

A president running a war is a very difficult busines, one of balance I would think, don't you?  Fortunately just one guy at a time has to do it right or wrong, and history will be the judge. Reading of great military leaders would be fascinating, but probably tedious, I don't know.  How did they get power?  How long did they stay on top, etc.

Back to Lincoln later, I'm off to do errands for the day.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 03, 2009, 02:12:07 PM
The "seesaw" of events in history is interesting. At one point the cabinet is so contentious they stop having mtgs and then when attacked from the Comm of 9, they all circle and protect Seward. I wonder if that "seesaw" can only happen i a democracy? It intriques me how our election of presidents has gone from one party, or philosopy, to another, back and forth. It's most notable in the presidential elections of the  last 60 yrs: after the crises of the Depression and WWII and wrapping up WWII under Truman, the electorate choose a seemingly calm, in-control-grandfather. Then we choose a young glamourous, exciting Kenndy. After the upheavals of the late 60's we choose a law-and-order man. Then after WAtergate we choose a man who would never lie to us, a soft-spoken southerner. AFter being "humiliated" by the Iranians, we choose a man who was optimistic and very pro-American. But his vice-presidnet when president seemed out of touch, so we choose a brilliant, but down-home, everyday kind of guy, etc. etc. You can write your own story about the last two  ;D

I never understood why the people who were for colonization tho't that any other country would take in 3 million people and let them set up a colony when the "colonizers"  didn't want to have them here. It never seemed to me to be  a well tho't out idea.

I would like to have known Pres Obama before he read ToR. He seems to be following so much of what L tho't/did. On pg 469 L's statement "w/ public sentiment, nothing can fail; w/out it nothing can succed." Certainly O is following that path, did he understand that before he read ToR, or did he absorb that from L? Is he just naturally so much aligned in his thinking and acting w/ L or has he learned from his study of him? The way he has handled the various factions at the G-20 sounds so like L.................is he channeling AL? Where's Shirley McClain when we need answers?  ;D ;D

I loved Seward statement about growing old and just when you learn about people and how they behave and how you can respond, you are no longer in position to use the info.................i have had that tho't often............."boy, if i'd have only known that 40 yrs ago!"..........now i try to pass my knowledge on to my children and younger people hoping they can use it.

I did learn 20 yrs ago about military jealousy. When i worked at Ft Dix, at one point the CofStaff was a very competent 6'7" colonel who had on his staff as the cmdr of one of the brigades a 6'5" colonel who by time-served out ranked the CofS, however, because of position the CofS was now his boss. At mtgs the CoS sat at the head of the table, of course. The bgrd cmdr sat to his left. It was a constant spat, otherwise known in the military as a p....ing contest. With 40 high priced directors sitting in the room, the two of them argued about every issue. If one said the sun is shining the other would say "only for the moment, it's turning cloudy." It was a joke and a waste of time and money. Both of them, BTW, were very smart, competent men, they just had this military rivalry going all the time.

I also love the quirks of history like the courier wrapping the cigars in Lee's orders and their being found.

And i am frustrated by the hyperbole of the press - of yesteryear and of today. Charging L w/ inciting an insurrection. Charging O w/ being a socialist. ............ it does surprise me that thruout our history Blacks have been so well behaved in spite of the horrible oppression, misbehavior of the justice system toward them, the snides and slights they have had to endure and the lynchings and murders. The fact that they have been responsible for the beginnings of very few riots or individual assassinations is quite remarkable to me. .......jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: lucky on April 03, 2009, 05:32:07 PM
Lincoln’s attitude towards blacks is not surprising.  How many of us grew up with prejudicial views of blacks?  Not too many years ago the arch  conservatist Charles Murray wrote a book called  “The Bell Curve” in which he argued that the intellectual capability of Blacks were highly deficient.  If we, more than a hundred years after the Civil War, still clung to these archaic notions, what can we expect of a l9th century statesman, when the disciplines of psychology, sociology and social history were unknown?  We are all to a greater of lesser degree the products of the society in which we live.  Blacks were kept in ignorance, not allowed education, and even after the Civil War, only received an inferior education.  Educated blacks, according to the landed aristocracy of the south, made poor field hands.  It is not surprising that white society looked upon blacks as inferior.  More than a hundred years later they were still viewed this way.  Lincoln did what he thought was best, and perhaps blacks would have been better off on an island of their own rather than living in a mangled south, viciously destroyed by the Union troops, a south that faced poverty and destitution and one that offered very little freedom to the freed slaves.  As late as the l930’s their condition in the deep south was little better than that of a slave.  And for whatever reason, there were more than 130 lynchings in the ‘30s.   Congress had come up with legislation to outlaw lynchings but the Dixiecrats informed Roosevelt that if such a law passed, they would veto his social welfare programs, and without their support such programs could not go through.  Can we really say that Lincoln was wrong in his thinking?   Marcus Garvey, in the l920’s called for the return to Africa of his black countrymen.  Perhaps he was influenced by Lincoln.
 
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 03, 2009, 06:55:22 PM
WHAT GREAT POSTS, JEAN AND LUCKY!

I love book discussions!

I love reading posts like that! 

Sincerity, personal opinions on history, opposing posts, posts of trustworthiness, conversation.  I would love to meet you both, everyone in this discussion, we would make a great round table.

JEAN, me, too, how many times I have said I wish I had known that when I was young!!!  And, as you pointed out, the nation changes every four or eight years wanting someone different, the brash for the polished, the young for the old, the old and wise for the young, the humorist for the staid.  Great fodder for the media, isn't it?  And there is so media today, whew!!

We are all to a greater of lesser degree the products of the society in which we live.  Blacks were kept in ignorance, not allowed education, and even after the Civil War, only received an inferior education.  Educated blacks, according to the landed aristocracy of the south, made poor field hands.  It is not surprising that white society looked upon blacks as inferior.  More than a hundred years later they were still viewed this way.  Lincoln did what he thought was best, and perhaps blacks would have been better off on an island of their own rather than living in a mangled south,

You are possibly right, LUCKY; no education, ignorant field hands, what could be expected of them as independent workman and businessmen?  But I can't agree that they would have been better off in an island of their own - one such as Haiti?  I doubt many black people today would agree with your opinion, but it would be interesting to have that discussion wouldn't it? 

Thanks for your opinion.

Isn't Seward an interesting fellow?  He hit upon the idea of the public makng an appeal for more troops for the war, rather than Lincoln calling for a recruitment during a time of defeat and panic among the population.  It isn't the same situation exactly, but my mind goes to the public demanding better weapons and, particularly, armored-plated trucks for our soldiers in the Iraq war.  The public demands and the government responds.  It works.










Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on April 03, 2009, 08:37:52 PM
Interesting how our view of things changes over the generations. Lincoln felt the war was necessary to prove that a government based on freedom can survive. Would it have occurred to any of us that our government might not survive?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 03, 2009, 08:56:12 PM
At first "The Bell Curve" got a better reception than it deserved, partly because most of the people who read it didn't know any statistics.  If you did, and looked at Murray's data in the back of the book, you saw that his numbers were pathetic--sloppy and probably dishonest.  His correlations were poor, his validity tests way below meaningful, etc.  In short, his numbers didn't prove a thing.  Since the whole argument of the book was based on his numbers, the whole book was meaningless.  Stephen Jay Gould wrote a wonderful revue in the New Yorker in which he analyzed the data in detail and showed clearly how worthless the arguments in the book were.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 04, 2009, 12:29:25 PM
We need to be careful about making the South the scapegoat in mid-20th centruy race relations. I grew up in south central Pennsylvania, about 20 mi north of the Mason-Dixon line and in the 1950's and 1960's Blacks lived in a segregated section of town, could get few jobs in town, mostly servile ones, were not welcome in most of the clubs and bars - maybe all, i wan't in the bars much at the time - were not welcome in mainstream churches in town and were not welcome in most white people's homes. I heard the N....word in polite company. ............................yes, we are the product of our society, but we don't have to stay the product of our upbringing. It surprises me that AL, who studied every thing was so unschooled about slavery. By the time he got into the presidency he had been in contact w/ people who believed slavery was an abomination and that no one should be treated in the way slaves were treated. He'd surely heard those conversations. He may not have been in contact w/ any Blacks who he could equate w/ his team of rivals, but he'd surely been in contact w/ whites who were as ignorant - in the truest sense of that word - as unschooled slaves. How could he not have seen that these were all human beings, w/ human feelings and human rights?

Yes! Lincoln was wrong in his thinking! And so were the pro-slavery, racist people who were in the society of the time, and so were the people of the 50's and 60's in my hometown, and so are the people today who are prejudiced against any people based on the person's ethnicity. Just because we might understand why people believe what they believe, does't mean that they are right in their belief.

Just an FYI, CSPAN 3 is at the moment showing a 2004 panel about biography and history which includes Joe Ellis, Annette Gordon-Reed and other historians you may know. It's directed at the question of whether biography is really history, is it good history, do biographers fall in love w/ their subjects? It's very interesting. It may be repeated later today or tomorrow.........................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 04, 2009, 01:26:27 PM
JEAN, I turned it on immediately, THANKS.  Very interesting.  And now...............

a symposium on Lincoln.  How timely!!!
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 04, 2009, 01:44:09 PM
Cspan3 for this hour 2-3pm is having a discussion as L as a Cmdr in Chief and this evening, starting at 8pm and continuing thru the evening they are doing AL on Cspan1, it says they will be doing L on cspan1 "weekly" on Sat nites, i don't know for how long. And they apparently have links to other AL sources. I haven't looked at them yet ...............

Here is a link to the cspan schedules
http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=schedule         

if you put the cursor on any block of program, you will get a description of the progam, or the book, in most cases................
jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on April 04, 2009, 02:29:42 PM
Looks like the biography program will be broadcast here in CA at one on CSPAN2. i DON'T GET CSPAN3 (WINSOM told me she had to fight to get it on her cable TV even though it's a free service).  I'll try to catch it. C-SPAN has made itself the station of the Lincoln bi-cenntenial, and I've caught several discussions, but wasn't organized enough to get their schedule. Thanks.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 04, 2009, 03:20:01 PM
Wasn't that great, JEAN.  Sorry you didn't get to hear it, JOAN, but as you said, there have been others and there will be others.

DID ANY OF YOU HEAR ANYTHING NEW?

New phrases, yes, interesting talks.  One of them said "All the evidence about Lincoln is old, but the questions are new." 

And one said Lincoln changes with the times one lives in and that's true I think.  One of the professors (most of them were profs at Columbia, I think) said we all see ourselves through the lens of Lincoln.  There are so many Lincolns.  The prairie fellow, the poor and the ignorant country fellow, the seeker of knowledge, the political Lincoln, the compromiser, and on and on. 

One professor talked about Lincoln and his Cooper Union speech referring to slavery and said historians do not give Lincoln credit for his ability to learn; his continuing evolvment of knowledge.  When black men joined the military and began to fight Lincoln immediately understood their equality and their fight for their country; all of his ideas of colonization were abolished.

I must look up a book about Henry Clay who hated slavery and yet kept all his slaves because he needed them.  Have you read anything about him?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 04, 2009, 05:17:32 PM
What of our rivals about this time?

Seward, like Lincoln, was self-assured, with a lasting cheerful countenance.  Great speaker, he loved to tell stories.  Wouldn't he and Lincoln have a great time together!  Wouldn't you liked to have been a mouse in the corner when those two were spending a couple of hours together. Didn't I read that Lincoln would walk over to Seward's house at times for company, imagine a president doing that today?

But there were problems in the Cabinet.

Chase, the Secretary of the Treasury, was often physically ill from what he perceived at the burdens of his office, and  he was responsible for the legislation financing the Army and getting it through Congress, but he got the job done; despite his gloom and his constant threats to resign Lincoln forgave him and soothed his feelings.

I don't recall reading much about Attorney General Bates lately; apparently he is causing no problems for Lincoln?

----------------------------------------------

In my opinion from reading this section of the book the background for Lincoln's decision to issue the Emancipation Proclamation was the possibility of 1) depriving the southern plantation owners of slave labor; 2) giving freedom to all black people which he had constitutional authority over,  and 3) recruiting the black men for the army which badly needed new soldiers.

It was a bold move at the time and it put Lincoln’s reelection in jeopardy.  Many thought it would prolong the war, fearing the South would fight harder and longer.

What do you think? 

Please correct me if I have it wrong, it's not exactly spelled out in the book. 

---------------------------------

And I am still not sure what started the Civil War other than the states rebelling over the laws enacted by the Congress over their rights to slavery in the newly created states. 

One of the professors on C-Span made the statement that the Civil War did not start over the problem of slavery.  Then what?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 04, 2009, 11:17:26 PM
Ella: "One of the professors on C-Span made the statement that the Civil War did not start over the problem of slavery.  Then what?"

Then what indeed, Ella.  He should have said.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 04, 2009, 11:20:11 PM
Jean: "How could he not have seen that these were all human beings, w/ human feelings and human rights?"

Ella: "When black men joined the military and began to fight Lincoln immediately understood their equality and their fight for their country; all of his ideas of colonization were abolished."

One of the surprises for me in this book was learning that for Lincoln, the war was primarily about preserving the Union rather than about slavery.  So what were Lincoln’s personal feelings?  He seems to have always felt that slavery was evil and wrong, but that, since it was allowed by the Constitution, we were stuck with it for a while, and the correct course was to keep it from spreading and let it die out naturally.  He also felt that any man in this country, black or white, should have an equal chance to make a living for himself and to better himself as his abilities allowed.

Lincoln was good at waiting for the right moment to do things, and the Peninsula campaign gave him the chance and provided him with the legal excuse he needed.  The Confederates were using slaves to great advantage in the camps.  "If the rebels were divested of their slaves, who would then be free to join the Union forces, the North could gain a decided advantage.  Seen in this light, emancipation could be considered a military necessity, a legitimate exercise of the president’s constitutional war powers."  (p 462)

When he finally signed the Emancipation Proclamation, he said "I never, in my life, felt more certain that I was doing right, than I do in signing this paper.  If my name ever goes into history it will be for this act, and my whole soul is in it."  He then waited a moment to unstiffen his hand (he had been at a long reception) to make sure that his signature would be firm, and not look hesitant.  (p 499)

It’s still not easy to figure out how he felt personally about blacks, but his feelings obviously evolved after he saw them in action and got to know them.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 04, 2009, 11:42:51 PM
Yes, Goodwin talks a lot about Lincoln wanting to preserve the Union, but why was the Union in jeopardy?  What happened to it?  Why did the states secede?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 05, 2009, 11:04:36 AM
CHAPTERS 20-26

This is our final week for the book and we have decided to throw the remaining chapters open for discussion with no structure at all, no questions to consider.

We hope that you will ask some questions for us to consider in our discussion.

These chapters for the most part describe the victories and defeats of the war, the  personalities involved, and Lincoln’s campaign and re-election for his second term.

And ends, of course, as we all know, in the tragic death of one of our most beloved president.

What shall we take away with us after reading this book?

As one of the professors on C-Span said yesterday, most readers remember only 10% of a book.  I am hoping for 5% anyway and hoping that I may know the final answer to my question as to what provoked the states to secede and what could have been done, if anything, to prevent this terrible war.

Perhaps there is no answer?  I know the Confederates fired on Fort Sumter and the war began, but there has to be a better answer than that.

I think I'll go digging around for an answer.

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on April 05, 2009, 12:08:48 PM
Jean: 'I would like to have known Pres Obama before he read ToR.'

That's an interesting observation. Just what lessons in statesmanship and political smarts can one learn from studying Lincoln's career? Was he in fact a great leader?

Pat: 'Lincoln was good at waiting for the right moment to do things.'

We were also reminded, by Jean, of Lincoln's famous words: 'with public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed.'

Pat, again: 'When he finally signed the Emancipation Proclamation, he said "I never, in my life, felt more certain that I was doing right, than I do in signing this paper.  If my name ever goes into history it will be for this act, and my whole soul is in it."  He then waited a moment to unstiffen his hand (he had been at a long reception) to make sure that his signature would be firm, and not look hesitant.'  (p 499)

With all due respect for Lincoln's character, it took a lot to bring him to that signing ceremony. He seemed almost afraid to move on the slavery issue. Preserving the Union must have seemed a safer issue, more easily made appealing, if 'mystical memories' were invoked, than the constitutionally supported slavery institution. Lincoln wasn't certain about 'public sentiment' on that. Hence his reluctance to move on it, to provide leadership. In fact it took a lot of pressure, like the two generals, Fremont and Baker(?) who were setting slaves free in their military command jurisdictions.

It all reminds me a bit of McClellan's reluctance to move forward. As objectives, it seemed just as difficult for Lincoln to go for emancipation as it was for McClellan to go for Richmond. Poor leadership in both cases. As for the war, it took Sherman and Grant to win it for Lincoln.

But Lincoln did win the big one by continuing to hold high the torch lit by the founding fathers, to look for greater meanings in the search for freedom and liberty and a strong republic.

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on April 05, 2009, 04:32:06 PM
It is hard for us now to understand the feelings of white people about slavery. Many abolitionists felt that slavery was wrong, but still did not see Blacks as people like them. For example, in Kansas, many who faught to make Kansas a free state also wanted to pass a law which would not allow any ex-slaves to enter the state. They knew abstractly that slavery was wrong, but were unable to see themselves dealing personally with any of the ex-slaves on an equal footing. I imagine Lincoln's initial feelings were much the same; he must have absorbed all the surrounding culture picturing blacks as ignorant savages. When he had actually met ex-slaves, and seen what they could do, he changed his mind.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 05, 2009, 05:03:10 PM
Ella - "STATES RIGHTS' - that was the slogan used as to why the CW  began. IMO you can break that down into less glorious words like "authority" - who is going to have it? -and "power" - whose is going to prevail? Some states, notably, S Carolina, threatened to seceed because they had a beef w/ the federal gov't  during the Jackson administration. J made it very clear he would not allow that and would send the U.S. army to prevent it. Since J had a major reputation as a general and was a southerner to boot, S.C. backed down. But the issue had not been decided about how much authority the federal gov't had over the states and how much leeway, aka freedom, the states had within the fed'l gov't orders/policies. At that point it had as much to do w/ tariff issues as w/ slavery issues -  both of which revolve around economics. What might the fed'l gov't have to say regarding my "property" and my business/profit? Sound familiar? Is this an ongoing issue thruout history?

The "umbrella" ongoing discussion is the battle between freedom and security. How much can the gov't do to keep us secure - physically, economically, etc. - before they have infringed on our freedoms? Can they make us wear helmets? Can they confiscate my hand lotion and knitting needles at the airport. Can they assess tariffs on European products to protect New Englands' product prices,  that will then raise prices for southerners' imported products?  Can they take away our property - land for highways? - slaves to protect their human rts?  Can they listen in on anybody's telephone conversations because i MIGHT be a terrorist and they have to protect the rest of the country from me? Can they say that people have the rt to sit any place on the bus, or eat in any public restaurant, or buy a house in my neighborhood, or go to my public school even if i am fearful of having some of those people near me? Can it raise my taxes to provide quality education for everybody in the country, because that makes the country more productive and safer? Can they raise my taxes in order to bail out AIG to keep the country safe economically?

 This has always been the discussion in any democracy where people expect that they have inherent, or declared, individual rts and freedom from their gov'ts. This is why we have a Bill of Rts in our constitution and why more of the cases that have come to the Supreme Court for a resolution have been based on the 14th amendment than on any other part of the constitution.

Before the CW, the dicussion was, on the surface, about states rights v. federal authority, but underneath the surface Southern slave owners knew their time was slipping away and they feared losing their livlihood and way of life.............................IMO....................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 05, 2009, 05:13:41 PM
Jonathan - was there a lack of leadership on L's part re the emanicipation proclamation or was it brilliant, practical leadership? Even those in his cabinet who were abolitionists believed he had to wait for a Union victory to have the nation w/ him psychologically. If he had pushed emanicipation earlier, would he have lost the  Union, as he feared? He may not have been ready, at an earlier time, to push emanicipation as a personal believe, but he also recognized that much of the population probably felt as he did and it might destroy the Union. As he said if he could free all the slaves to save the Union he would do it, etc.

I don't think L did everything right, but in that instance he apparently had the right instincts about when to lead in that issue. ..........................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on April 05, 2009, 05:31:20 PM
I heard one discussion on Lincoln last night. The discussant (sorry, I can't remember his name) was talking about different definitions of libery (ie. freedom). Lincoln was quoted (I paraphrase) as saying that he thought of Liberty as the freedom of each man to ork and enjoy the fruits of his labor, whereas the South thought of it as the freedom to enjoy the fruits of another man's labor.

He pointed out the two kinds of freedom: freedom from, and freedom to. The Revolution had been faught to obtain freedom from: i.e. freedom from an oppressive government. That is the way most American's thought of it before Lincoln: they wanted as little government as possible, especially the national government, which they didn't trust.

But one function of government is to prevent the strong from oppressing the weak. "Freedom from" strong government can mean, as it did in this case, freedom to oppress those who are weaker, in other words, restricting the slaves "freedom to" live their lives as they wish.

This man argued that Lincoln's era had changed the definition of freedom from "freedom from" an oppressive government to "freedom to": each person having as much freedom as possible to maximize his potential, live his life.

It seems to me this tension always exists in big ways and small. My freedom always impinges on another's freedom, and the law adjudicates where one stops and the other starts. If I play the TV late at night, I impinge on my neighbors right to sleep. So I lose my freedom to watch the shows I want, or he loses his right to sleep.

But my son works at night. When my neighbor plays his radio during the day, it keeps my son from getting the sleep he needs. He is sensative to even low levels. Should the neighbor have to give up his radio because he lives above a night-working poor sleeper? Or is it my son's job to adjust either his work or his sleeping? One will lose some freedom.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 05, 2009, 05:48:27 PM
Joan - that was James McPherson, professor emeritus from Princeton U. He has written some good histories.

 The panel on biography was very good also. Ella mentioned that she enjoyed it. When i was in graduate school, during a couple semesters i was asked by one of the professors who had a seminar for undergrad Ed majors to talk about resources to teach about women's history. His name was Joe Ellis and he looked just like the historian/author Joe Ellis of today. I'd love to know if they are father and son. I sent an e-mail to h/a JE at Mt Holyhoke where he teaches, but i didn't get any reply. ..............jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on April 05, 2009, 05:51:44 PM



The Book Club Online  is  the oldest  continuing book club on the Internet, begun in 1996, open to everyone.  We offer cordial discussions of one book a month,  24/7 and  enjoy the company of readers from all over the world.  Everyone is welcome to join in.

Team of Rivals
by
Doris Kearns Goodwin

(http://seniorlearn.org/bookclubs/teamofrivals/teamcvr.jpg)                         

"More books about Abraham Lincoln line the shelves of libraries than about any other American. Can there be anything new to say about our 16th president? Surprisingly, the answer is yes. - ..... Doris Kearns Goodwin has written an elegant, incisive study of Lincoln......." - New York Times

The Team:
William H. Seward
Salmon P. Chase
Edward Bates
.........     Links:
NPR Review (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4989622)
Wilmot Proviso (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilmot_Proviso)
Dred Scott Decision (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford)
Kansas-Nebraska Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas-Nebraska_Act)
Fugitive Slave Law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Slave_Law_of_1850)



Discussion Leaders:
Ella (egibbons28@columbus.rr.com) & PatH (rjhighet@earthlink.net)





Thank you, Jean. It's funny --I've always been able to remember people's ideas a lot better than their names.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 06, 2009, 09:30:29 AM
Great posts, everyone!

Questioning Lincoln's leadership; the rights of the individual vs. the government.  It all started with the revolution didn't it?  Jefferson was a stout states' rights advocate, but Adams was a Federalist (I think I remember this correctly).  And the two didn't speak for years until they were old men.

Jean, correct me if I am wrong.

I love these kinds of conversation regarding our rights.  We all have a story!  We moved in 1961 to a little country village (you should see it now!) and bought lovely acreage with loads of trees.  Within 5 years the federal goverment notified us that they were confiscating a sliver of our land for a exit from a freeway.  What a fight we had!  Imminent doman! 

The government can and will and is probably right in doing so, even though it hurts.  I will not live long enough for them to close that highway when people stop driving cars, as I believe must happen in the future! 

--------------------

This young John Hay  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hay)  that lived in the White House and served as secretary to Lincoln had this to say about him:

"The Tycoon is in fine whack.  He is managing this war, the draft, foreign relations, and planning a reconstruction of the Union, all at once.  I never knew with what tyrannous authority he rules the Cabinet, till now....I am growing more and more firmly convinced that the good of the country absolutely demands that he should be kept where he is till this thing is over.  There is no man in the country, so wise, so gentle and so firm.  I believe the hand of God placed him where he is."  (pg.545)

What praise!  He must have idolized the man.

I wonder how many of the staff live in the White House today?

And what they think of Obama and his family.  How a president is scrutinized!  What kind of a person wants the job? 

But, golly, Obama has a lot on his mind also.  A war, the economy, the debt, the debt, the debt, the debt - all those debts that our countrymen and women owe - all those debts that our government owes.  The decades of excess have caught up with us all.

Sorry about going on.................................



Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 06, 2009, 09:52:56 AM
Jean to the rescue.  I was really not coming up with any ideas about non-slavery causes of the war, but you made a very good case.  Convinced me.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 06, 2009, 10:01:00 AM
We weren't supposed to have any questions this week, but I'd like to pose one anyway.  Reading this book didn't just tell me more about Lincoln, it changed the way I thought about him, because it showed me his character in a different light, and I see more of what he was really about.  (Details later)

Did any of you feel that way?  Did the book change how you perceived Lincoln?  And how convincing was Goodwin's take on his character?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 06, 2009, 06:21:19 PM
Pat, I'll have to give it some thought, although I would love to hear why you changed your views of Lincoln.  Perhaps reading how others viewed Lincoln, both as a man and as a leader, was at times new. 

Lincoln will never die in this country I don't think.  We all revere him and for many different reasons -  the man was complex. 

I've often wondered if there had been no Civil War during his presidency if he would be as famous, what do you think?

And I failed to thank JEAN for giving me all those reasons for thinking of the causes of the Civil War other than slavery.  States rights!  Yes, and that is an ongoing war isn't it? 

later, eg
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on April 07, 2009, 12:15:21 PM
" I believe the hand of God placed him where he is."  (pg.545) John Hay

John Hay was very close to Lincoln as one of his secretarys, and must have had many opportunities to read the 'Tycoon's' mind, and his methods. The fine things he says about Lincoln may reflect his loyalty to the boss, but things were often going so badly for the president, it's difficult to understand how Hay could have seen him as a man of destiny...God's chosen.

There were others in the North who felt that way. Harriet Beecher Stowe had this to say about Lincoln. In 1864.

'This great contest has visibly been held in the hands of Almighty God, and is a fulfilment of the solemn prophecies with which the Bible is sown thick as stars, that he would spare the soul of the needy, and judge the cause of the poor. It was he who chose the instrument for this work, and he chose him with a visible reference to the rights and interests of the great majority of mankind, for which he stands.'

There's more about God searching in the backwoods, for a simple man of the people, who would serve as his instrument. Lincoln, as we have learned, set out wanting to earn the respect of his fellow man. There's nobility in that. Only years later in the depths of the crises did he wonder if God was taking a hand in determining  the direction the country would take.

In the meantime however, it's interesting to hear what Lincoln thought about Harriet Beecher Stowe. It seems the president was often withdrawing books from the library. He had borrowing privileges at the Library of Congress. We remember that he borrowed the Library's copy of Gen Halleck's military manual after which Lincoln had a hand in planning the 'capture' of  Norfolk, with the help of Stanton and Chase.

Then, in 1862, Lincoln borrows Stowe's: A Key to Uncle Tom's Cabin; Presenting the Original  Facts and Documents upon which the Story is Founded. Lincoln was so  impressed he had Stowe drop in at the White House and greeted her with:

'Is this the little woman who made this great war?'

Sure, states' rights played a part in testing the  political heritage of the first revolution, and Lincoln was very much a part of that, but eventually it came to the crunch and then it came down to reality in which 'man proposes and God disposes.' The slaves had God on their side...etc, etc.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 07, 2009, 01:44:37 PM
I don't think the book "changed" my thinking about AL in gen'l, but it  gave my tho'ts more depth. I had read a bio of Mary L many years ago and i read Stone's novel about them. As I said before i had a lot of history about the battles, in high school history classes and growing up 30 mins away from Gettysburg. None of that gave me any pshychological impressions about  AL, so i think this book gave me that depth to flesh out who he was. My early impressions of who he was were not negated, but added too.................

Ella and Pat, you have done a wonderful job of guiding us thru this discussion, thanks for you time and expertise on this.......................
I mentioined before that i am reading a novel of Tho Flemings', The WAges of Fame, that i think you all might enjoy. It is a prelude to TofR. It focuses on the time of Andrew Jackson and has all the characters from that period, including Peggy Eaton and that whole scandal and politically divisive episode. It's a little melodramatic in places, but Fleming is a renown historian and, as i mentioned, it's not much different from reading DKG except the story is powered by some fictional characters........................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 07, 2009, 05:43:35 PM
HELLO JONATHAN!  You are bringing God into this discussion quoting Stowe declaring that the war was in the hands of God! And God chose Lincoln as his instrument!  And HE disposed of the Confederates!  MERCY ON US! 

Stowe was rather religious, having been raised in the home of her father, a minister, and having married a minister.  I didn't know that until I looked her up on Google.

Goodwin tells us that Lincoln "fused spiritual faith with politics" in his second inaugural address when he said:  "Fondly do we hope-fervently do we pray-that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away.  Yet, if God wills that it continue, ...........so still it must be said that 'the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.'"

I much prefer Lincoln’s stories and especially his metaphors:  “A man watches his pear tree day after day, impatient for the ripening of the fruit. Let him attempt to force the process, and he may spoil both fruit and tree.  But let him patiently wait and the ripe pear at length falls into his lap.”

He was very good at this, wasn't he? 

Are you leaving us, JEAN?   Oh, don't go yet.  Before we disperse altogether, I do feel we ought to comment on a few more incidents that Goodwin writes about.  The Fall of Atlanta, Sherman's March to the Sea, Hampton Roads Conference, Lincoln's Dream and his Final Words.  All so fascinating, all so terrible in many ways.


Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on April 07, 2009, 06:04:10 PM
If there had been no civil war, would Lincoln have been a great president? Someone said that in order to be a great president, you need a great challenge. I guess that's true. Although if he had somehow managed to keep the union together, that would have been a great challange, too.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 07, 2009, 06:49:47 PM
The Gettysburg Address critiqued:

Many years ago, when computerized programs critiquing writing started to become popular, my husband Bob typed the Gettysburg Address into one.  Here's what it said (there are 2 or 3 minor errors because he was typing it in from memory):

Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.  (Split into two sentences?  Long sentence: 29 words.)  Now we are engaged in a great (is this justified? great) civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure.  (Split into two sentences)  We are met on a great (is this justified? great) battlefield of that war.  We have come here to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting place for those who gave their lives that that (repeated word) nation might live.  It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.  But (sentence begins with but) in a larger sense we cannot dedicate—we cannot consecrate—we cannot hallow this ground.  (Is sentence too negative?)  The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract.  (Is sentence too negative?)  The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget (negative: never forget) what they have done here.  It is for us, the living, rather to be here dedicated to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced.  It is rather (weak sentence start) for us to be here dedicated to the great (is this justified? great) task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave their last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth in freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, and for the people shall not perish from the earth. 
(Split into two sentences.  Is sentence too negative?  Long sentence: 72 words.  Negative not perish.)

Overall critique:

Readability index: 10.17  readers need a 10th grade level of education  (a scale in which 4th-6th is simple, 6th-10th is good, and 10th-14th is complex)

Strength index: 0.00 (on a scale where 0 is weak and 1 is strong).  The writing can be made more direct by using:  shorter sentences, fewer weak phrases, more positive wording.

Descriptive index: 1.10 where 0 = terse and 1.1 = wordy.  The writing style is overly descriptive.  Many adjectives are being used.

Jargon index 0.00

No sentence structure recommendations.

Words to review
Negative words (N), jargon (J), words your reader may not understand (?)
Cannot (N), consecrated (?), detract(?), endure (J), fought (N), hallow (?), not (N), poor (N), vain (N), consecrate (?), dead (N), devotion (J), forget (N), fourscore (?), never (N), perish (N), struggled (N), war (N).

OK, it's a primitive program and you can see what it's thinking, but really!  Strength index 0.0 where 0 is weak and 10 is strong.  After all these years and countless exposure to the speech, I still can't read it aloud without choking up.  In fact I choked up just now when I was mumbling it to myself checking Bob's version against the version in Goodwin.

If any of you has access to a modern program of this sort, I'd love to know what it makes of the speech.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 08, 2009, 12:44:08 PM
No, Ella, i'm not leaving, i just know i'm going to have a busy end of week and wanted to be sure that i  complimented and thanked you and Pat for leading us so well.

e.g. Pat's giving us this wonderful critique of the G-burg Address. I loved that. I remember trying a grammar checker when they first came out. I was working for Dept of Army who was also training people in "simplistic" writing. I quickly turned off the grammar checker because it did things like saying there was a duplication of words ("that that") which was perfectly appropriate. The DofA program didn't want more than 15 words in a sentence and 10 sentences to a paragraph and other such stupid rules. Of course, it was necessary to address the issue because many people did need reminding that they were not filibustering in every memo they wrote, or showing off how smart they were w/ 4 and 5 syllable words.

Having a writing program analyze and criticize the GA is just too funny. It's such a masterful piece of communication. Thanks Pat....................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on April 08, 2009, 03:33:52 PM
The book did change my view of Lincoln. Perhaps also of the job of president. I knew abstractly how many things presidents had to handle at once, what a constant political balancing act they had to do, and how hard they worked, but this book really gives the sense of it in a way other books I've read don't.

I always thought of Lincoln as tortured, because his late portraits look that way. Perhaps this picture is not wrong, but I was surprised when over and over contemporaries emphasized how calm he was, and how able to find moments of relaxation and simple humor.

His sense of humor is very much that of the times, reminding me of Mark Twain and other writers of the time. We don't think of things like sense of humor varying with time and culture, but they do.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on April 08, 2009, 10:13:31 PM
Pat, no one has critiqued the Gettysburg address half as well as you, by describing the effect of its few words on you as you repeat them to yourself. It's magnificent how much Lincoln managed to say in his two minute speech. Goodwin pays him a fine tribute, also in a few words:

'Lincoln had translated the story of his country and the meaning of the war into words and ideas accessible to every American...had forged for his country an ideal of its past, present and future that would be recited and memorized by students forever.' p587

Interesting, too, is the tribute paid to Lincoln by the main speaker at the battlefield dedication ceremony, whom Goodwin quotes, Edward Everett, the Harvard professor and renowned orator:

' "I should be glad," he wrote Lincoln the following day, "if I could flatter myself that I came as near to the central idea of the occasion, in two hours, as you did in two minutes." ' p586

Wouldn't it be safe to say that before many years had passed, many of Lincoln's 'people' would feel that his address made the occasion? His speeches made him famous. Much of his reputation rests on what he said. For me, Goodwin has brought out his brilliant political traits. She has made a Lincoln fan out of me.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 09, 2009, 10:27:08 AM
PAT, I thought it was a horrible thing to subject Lincoln's famous words to a critique by a computer program.  Who would possibly care if the sentences are too long or too weak.

"I still can't read it aloud without choking up"  NEITHER CAN I!  Those words - " we cannot dedicate—we cannot consecrate—we cannot hallow this ground.  The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract" describe forever the emotions of any people who have lived through a war and lost loved ones. 

Hello JOAN!  I think everyone is surprised that in time of trouble, awful terrible struggles within the nation, that Lincoln could maintain calm at times and humor.  How did he sleep at night, for instance, knowing that decisions concerning the lives of thousands lay on his shoulders.  I don't know.

JONATHAN, many other men changed their minds about Lincoln and became fans.  See page 595 where Goodwin quotes James Russell Lowe, Harvard professor, and Charles Francis Adams, minister to Great Britain and others.

Lincoln moved through his campaign for re-election to the presidency with little opposition, no one thought of any other candidate in time of war. 

"A visitor to the White House at this time told Lincoln that 'nothing could defeat him but Grant's caputure of Richmond, to be followed by the general's nomination at Chicago' and Lincoln replied "I feel very much like the man who said he didn't want to die particularly, but if he had got to die, that was precisely the disease he would like to die of."
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 09, 2009, 10:34:38 AM
What I kept looking for in the book were examples of what we call today the Secret Service, or security for the President. 

Has anyone read of security for him?  I remember reading about his trip to Richmond right after the city fell and thinking where is security for him?  He rode on a boat as I remember and didn't he have Mary with him? 

Anyway throughout the book little attention is given to security for any of the people in office in Washington, in my opinion.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 09, 2009, 02:02:40 PM
Ella - you are right about Jefferson and Adams. Jefferson was very much against  the federal gov't having much power, or doing much spending, or being very large. Of course, when he got to be president and had the opportunity he purchased the Louisiana Territory, w/out getting Congressional approval and probaly an  unconstitutional move, and he established West Point as an institution to educate military officers. Two of the largest expenditures that a president had ever done outside of war expenses, even more than Adams had ever done.

I believe the Secret Service was started near the end of the 19th century, maybe after McKinley was assassinated. Lincoln was often accompanied by military members, especially during the war, but there was no organized protection. Altho a friend, Pinkerton, often provided some body guards for him - yes, the same Pinkerton that we think of as armored truck services today. I'll check on the SS and see what i can find out.....................jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 09, 2009, 02:05:28 PM
http://www.secretservice.gov/history.shtml

As you note, the SS was started in 1865, but as an investigation body to deter counterfeiters. They are administered by the Treasury Dept for that reason. Cleveland was the first president to get "partial" protection and Congress requested full-time protection for TR after the McKInley assassination. ...............jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on April 09, 2009, 02:47:31 PM
On that night in Fords theater, Lincoln's valet was seated outside the door to the balcony. John Wilkes Booth talked to him, and showed him a card or paper, and the valet nodded him through. It's not known exactly what transpired between them. (James L. Swanson "Manhunt").
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 09, 2009, 05:48:24 PM
Thanks, JEAN, for that information.   Pinkerton is now a armored bank service?  I never pay any attention to those armored trucks, but the name Pinkerton rings all kinds of bells in my memory bank.  I can't right now bring up why, but give me time, hahahaaa 

The bells are ringing, for.....................

I am reading a little book I bought about the Stanford/Thaw murder at the turn of the century and McKinley's assassination is mentioned.  A fellow in the crowd had a towel wrapped around his hand as if he had a wound, but when he went to shake the President's hand, he shot the gun.  Actually, McKinely could have been saved today, he died of gangrene; the doctors who removed the bullet wore no surgical gloves or masks and there were no sanitary measures taken.

None of it would have happened if security had been tightened or, at least, one hopes it doesn't happen today.  I watch Obama shaking hands with the crowd in other countries and the security fellows have their eyes wide open scanning the crowds.  Even with that, it seems he is taking chances but I think a president needs approval from the ordinary folks, don't you?

HI JOAN.   Now that information is contradictory to what I remember reading somewhere.  The valet, who was supposed to be sitting outside the door of the president's box,  had gone outside or somewhere in the building momentarily and Booth had waited his chance. 

But your story is that he was there!  Hmmmmmm!

Who would know?

What do you make of Lincoln's dream of death on page 728?
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: winsummm on April 09, 2009, 11:14:54 PM
I read the sample in my new Kindle today. It is about three chapters long and is free. I kept waiting for Lincoln to come alive or at least for someone to be more than a simple narrative statement of fact.  I can see why Obama models himself after L> and possibly even why he chose  Illinois to begin his political career. On the whole I don't care for the writing, so will pass. 

 As for the rivals the Salon Chase character made me think of the Chase financial group that I just read about in HOUSE OF CARDS and which took over my bank recently.  I wonder if it is the same family.

I'm looking forward to three cups of tea next month. I've read it and own it but will be happy to revisit it, since I loved it.  see you there.

claire
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 10, 2009, 05:38:24 PM
WINSUMMM!  Sorry you didn't like the book, was it the first three chapters or a summation or what did you get free with the Kindle?  My daughter is thinking of buying a Kindle and I am anxious to try it; at this point I can't believe that anything would be as satisfying as a book but I am willing to give it a try!

Here is a clickable to the history of the Chase Bank - Chase Bank (http://"http://"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chase_National_Bank#Chase_National_Bank")

Aaron Burr's bank!  We discussed a biography of Burr sometime ago, interesting!

SHERMAN'S MARCH TO THE SEA!  I've always thought it was so cruel, but necessary to defeat the South.  On pg. 684-85 Goodwin describes it briefly and ends it this way.

"Though the military gains justified the march in the minds of Union soldiers, the memory of its terrible impact on civilian lives haunts the South to this day.

Anyone here from the South?  Any reverberations that you know of?

What has been your reaction to Sherman's March which WAS portrayed so vividly in the movie GONE WITH THE WIND.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 12, 2009, 03:07:58 PM
Happy Easter, everyone, I'll be on to talk later.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 12, 2009, 06:58:06 PM
HAPPY EASTER EVERYONE! 

I ate too much, but that's okay.  Spring is here and I'll be out walking more and hopefully losing weight.

And we are about ready to close the book, aren't we?

Any comments before we do?

I have so enjoyed the discussion!  I hope all of you have enjoyed it also and I hope we meet again in another nonfiction discussion!

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Jonathan on April 12, 2009, 10:49:47 PM
I enjoyed it immensely, and wish to thank everyone who took part in the discussion for adding to my appreciation of the book. What a vast subject. I doubt if the book will ever close on Lincoln and his times. Goodwin has got me hooked. I only close her book to pick up another on the subject. There's so much new stuff coming out all the time. Lincoln had, and still has, his detractors, but it seems to me the more closely he's examined the better he looks. What a great love for his country. What  a great devotion to the republic established to perpetuate a democratic form of government, and what success in persuading his countrymen to preserve it over four gruelling years. What an astounding posthumous career for this backwoodsman, who owed nothing to anyone, and yet looked to everyone for support politically, and got it. So much thought was given to every move. It seemed such a delightful candour to admit that Seward's reflection on the timing of the Emancipation Proclamation was something he had not thought about. Wait for a military success. Then proclaim. I also got the impression that he owed Seward on the meaning for the rest of the world of maintaining the democratic republic. Seward's travels and experience must have made him aware of that.

A good read. A good discussion. A good experience. But I did miss the the Southern point of view. And wasn't there a lot to read between the lines.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 12, 2009, 11:03:43 PM
This book elucidated Lincoln’s thought processes in a way that surprised me.  I had not realized what a lawyerly way of thinking he had, but reading what Goodwin says, I recognize a way of thinking familiar to me from my childhood.

Lincoln started out with some basic principles, mainly the Constitution, plus a system of ethics (mostly Christian) and honesty, and everything he thought or did was a logical extension of these.  He worked things over carefully, but once he had come to his conclusion about what was right, he was firm in sticking to it.  And for everything he wanted to do, he had a legal basis, did it by the rules, even if he had to be ingenious.  When the laws bound him (as in the case of slavery in the original States) he accepted the constraint, but looked for a legal way to work around the problem.  On top of all this, he was scrupulously honest, meant what he said, and didn’t go back on his commitments.

The Cooper Union speech is a good example.  I had heard that it was an example of Lincoln deliberately showing the politicians  "look, this is a line I can take that will appease all the fringes of the party and make me electable."  When you read the speech, you see that it's not, he’s just saying the same things he was saying all along, and it’s a little masterpiece of legalistic arguments for his points (and also a masterpiece of really clever assumptions).

Why is this part of my upbringing?  My father was a lawyer, and that was exactly how he thought: adherence to law, firmness of principles, sticking with what he thought was right, extreme ingenuity in finding rules to fit what you wanted to do, and totally inflexible personal integrity.  His contribution to humanity was rewriting the patent law, not saving the country, but you do what you can.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: Ella Gibbons on April 14, 2009, 11:44:54 AM
JONATHAN, thank you for your post.  I, too, would like to hear, or read, the Southern view; perhaps in another discussion.  Do you have a book in mind?  Every once inawhile the Confederate flag appears somewhere in the South or a racial incident happens to bring that conflict, that terrible war, to our attention.  Reconstruction!  I'm sure there is a book somewhere on the subject.

PAT, what a good and great tribute to your father!  I'm sure he is pleased with you and is smiling at your words.  There was so much more in the book and in Lincoln's life that we did not cover; we did not have the time in one discussion to fully explore all the facets of the period in which Lincoln lived and died.  Truly a good politician, a president for the ages. 

Book TV had a number of authors and speakers last weekend about Lincoln.  New material coming out and one fellow has written a book about Lincoln - the man in the monuments - a study with images of all the monuments to Lincoln and their history.  One was fascinating.  There was a monument somewhere in Indiana and during WWII the people decided to send it to Great Britain as a gesture of friendship.  Well, the government got involved and what a hullabaloo that became.

And so it goes.......................

THANKS, AGAIN, EVERYONE!  I think we did Doris Kearns Goodwin proud.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: PatH on April 14, 2009, 03:33:05 PM
You're right, Ella, there's so much more we could have said.  But we said a lot!

Thank you, the faithful few who stuck it out--few but good!  There were so many detailed and thoughtful posts, so many good ideas being tossed around that it really added up.  I'm glad we had this discussion; it was a lot of work, but really worth it.
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: JoanK on April 14, 2009, 03:57:54 PM
I too enjoyed the discussion greatly. You all gave me so much to think about with your wonderful comments, and I feel that my sense and appreciation not only for Lincoln, but for that period in our history and culture has deepened.

As a sociologist, I was fascinated by what I can only call the "flavor" of the times: the differences in the way people viewed America, the way they conducted themselves, even the sense of humor made me realize how many changes in our attitudes occur over time without our being aware of it.

Examples: can you imagine fist fights, even gunshots between Congressmen today, at the same time that they felt that it wasn't honorable to vote for themselves? Can you imagine thinging of the US as a new experiment in freedom which might not survive? Can you imagine the clever insults and slapstick humor that politicians engaged in? Unfortunately, it's also hard to imagine the kind of honesty and adherance to principal in a politician that we see in Lincoln.

Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: mabel1015j on April 15, 2009, 02:39:07 AM
In watching Obama today i wondered if Lincoln was a comfortable being president and w/ his decisions as Pres Obama "seems" to be? The only other president i can think of that i have "known" who seemed so comfortable was Gerald Ford. L and O both had that tall, lanky, look. Men of that stature often seem to be "strolling" along when they walk giving them an air of confidence. I think that's why Obama has such high approval numbers in these hard times. He exudes confidence and therefore gives us confidence that things will be all right. It's just amazing how much they seem to be alike and that we read this book at this time.

Again i thank Ella and Pat for leading us and for the rest of you for providing such an interesting conversation.............jean
Title: Re: Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin ~ Book Club Online
Post by: jane on April 15, 2009, 10:16:14 AM
This discussion is now locked and will be archived in a few days.

Thank you for your participation.