I just discovered that Watts has included an extensive Notes section in the back. He's made a few comments and then lists a bunch of scientific studies. These seem, what I glanced over, mostly pschological, neurological and biological. I expect some of these pertain to brain/computer interfacing, but I didn't see anything specific in that department when I scanned over some of the references. I do not remember any such notes behind blindsight, but they may not be on the free ebook versions.
Here is an example in Notes, under the heading, "Psy-ops and the Consciousness Glitch", p358-359, and looking back at what he wrote in
Blindsight:
...the then-radical notion of consciousness-as-nonadaptive-side-effect has started appearing in the literature (1), and that more and more "conscious" activities (including Math!(2)) are turning out to be nonconscious after all (3,4,5)...
He also lists one study that opposes the notion that logical reasoning is an unconscious act. I am not going to try to type in all the references. The ! behind Math is his, not mine.
Daniel Bruks, like Siri Keeton in
Blindsight, lives in a world gone mad with escaped GMO's, genetic manipulation, and direct technological interfacing. Daniel is what he calls a "baseline", or one of the few who haven't been or had themselves modified, and are unplugged from the collective networking. What tech he uses is "old school". And here he is (along with us) trying to keep up and make some modicum of sense out of the whole thing.
One of the things that caught my eye is the notion that when you plug into a collective network, you become one small bit of the whole; you lose your sense of self and become something else. A warning perhaps? The WWW and social networking taken to extremes? Plug in 24/7 and you don't exist as a seperate person anymore. The hive monastic hive minds in the book, while they use technology, appear to be plugged in to their collective on a psychic level.
Daniel is quite amusing in his confusion and as he tries to keep up and avoid panicking too badly.