Good morning!
What a treat to come in this morning after taking a day off to celebrate granddaughter's third birthday!
So many new ideas - and different ways of looking at Barbara Pym's novel. I think we are finally getting to the reasons the book was shortlisted for the Booker prize. And yes, JoanK is right - we are looking forward to a discussion of the novel that was the winner in 1980 - Paul Scott's
Staying On...in the coming year. You'll be hearing more about that in the near future.
Your recent posts begin to answer the second question in the heading which asks for your thoughts on Pym's intention when she wrote this novel. We'd love to hear what you think of what Marcie and Rosemary have posted -
From
Marcie - - I'm not feeling as "depressed" about the characters as most of you seem to be. I think I'm focusing less on what actually happens and more on the humorous descriptions and inner dialogs that we get to hear. I'm seeing this as a comedy of manners where how things are presented might be more significant than what happens. I might be misreading but I can see a balance between a presentation that shows humor as well as the hard facts of life."
From
Rosemary - quoting Barbara Pym herself - "...Crome Yellow made me want to be a novelist myself. I don't suppose for a moment that
I appreciated the book's finer satirical points, but it seemed to me funnier than anything I had read before , and the idea of writing about a group of people in a certain situation - in this case upper-class intellectuals in a country house - immediately attracted me...."
And then
Barbara's conclusion - this book is not really about one individual's choice about how to lead ones' life - but about retirement itself, (the main character of the book?) and the challenges, the choices it presents to everyone...single, married or somewhere in-between.
Ursa - I don't know anyone who has been married for 58 years to the same man! I know who to come to for advice now! My husband's retirement was quite difficult - for me!
"Choice" seems to be the
mot du jour - running through most of your posts -
Joan K "All the ingrediants that Mildred had in her life are available to the four in Quartet, but they do not choose them. That is why the ending (I feel) is upbeat. Norman and Letty, perhaps for the first time, realize that they have
choices. That they can influence their world."
Joan, don't you think Marjorie, who is the same age as Letty, is an example of this?
Pedln - "interference is another matter" -
"- it's hard to know when we are interfering and when we are helping sometimes."
nlhome "There isn't any answer but I believe we should make reasonable efforts to help people but leave them in peace if they reject that help"
Ursa- Amen! Choices - provide them with choices! I also feel that that presented with
choices, both Letty and Marcia responded. It's their perceived lack of choice that limits them. Will Letty accept Marjorie's invitation to bring "the boys" out to the country? Doesn't really matter...she now has the choice!
Rosemary - do you have any thoughts on Pym's comment which you cited? - "the idea of writing about a group of people in a certain situation - in this case upper-class intellectuals in a country house - immediately attracted me...." Was this comment made in reference to
Quartet in Autumn?