My 'new' used book arrived this evening - "Relke on Love and Other Difficulties" translated by John J.L.Mood - I shop Amazon's marketplace - for $3.69 including 2 day shipping, I have a lovely copy of a book that priced new is $7.95 - when you buy as many books as I do every dollar saved counts.
Reading the first pages I learn that Rilke was far beyond the women's liberation advocates of a Mlle. de Beauvoir in the 60s and also, he wrote from a masculine view point with masculine goals of freedom and equality as its primary focus. In the intro to Letters on Love the translator says, "he started at the place where most of us at best manage finally to end up" He quotes in response to Rilke's understanding of solitude and the provisional nature of being human.
Rilke says, "Verily, nature speaks not of love; nature bears it in her heart and more knows the heart of nature,. Verily, God bears love in the world, yet the world overwhelms us. Verily, the mother speaks not of love, for it is borne for her within the child, and the child destroys it. Verily, the spirit speaks not of love, for the spirit thrusts it into the future, and the future is remote. Verily, the lover speaks not of love, for to the lover it comes in sorrow, and sorrow sheds tears."
I had to take a minute to digest this - I looked and saw the love spoken by the mother is borne not born - and then it started to clear up because of course the child has to break that bond in order to be a free adult with their own self - not sure about the lover in sorrow nor the love in spirit but I am thinking as I read it will become clear.
Oh my - I am reading and sharing immediately - I love what he says about marriage - let me quote "...It is a question in marriage, to my feeling, not of creating a quick community of spirit by tearing down and destroying all boundaries, but rather a good marriage is that in which each appoints the other guardian of his solitude, and shows him this confidence, the greatest in his power to bestow. A togetherness between two people is an impossibility, and where it seems, nevertheless, to exist, it is a narrowing, a reciprocal agreement which robs either one party of both of his fullest freedom and development. But once the realization is accepted that even between the closest human beings infinite distances continue to exist, a wonderful living side by side can grow up, of they succeed in loving the distance between them which makes it possible for each to see the other whole and against a wide sky!"
We are not to know why
this and that masters us;
real life makes no reply,
only that it enrapturesus
makes us familiar with it
May 1924
If you'd attempt this, however; hand in hand to be mine,
as the wine in the wineglass is wine.
If you'd attempt this.
November, 1925
Are not the nights fashioned from the sorrowful
space of all the open arms a lover suddenly lost.
Eternal lover, who desires to endure: exhaust
yourself like a spring, enclose yourself like a laurel.
Summer, 1909
Interesting - the space of self-hood is what he values - I never thought of it, but it is that space where we retain our integrity of self - our dreams and thoughts that are our own and not the shared dreams and thoughts that become a common force in a marriage - the promise to each other to protect that space, so that we continue to be more than the mingling of our essence - the concept opens my mind and yet, it is what we think of today in a healthy marriage. I remember it was not the concept that were the guides to a happy marriage written in magazines or, shown as the example of the good wife in the movies or, in the basis of the women's role in novels back in the 50s and for many of us, right into the early 80s.
Ah so - I get it now - to be entwined in a love union is, if only temporarily, bridging that space and that is where the sorrow comes in. Sorrow for the space that is lost and hopefully to be found again. So we trade the entanglement of love with the loss of the space that like a buttress holds us as individuals.