What an interesting article on color. If Homer were blind as has been believed, would he actually know what the colors were?
C'mon these people were seafarers, not coastal amateurs! hahaha, well there you are. I love these off the cuff comments on posted articles. I'm a coastal amateur and I saw no wine dark sea. It's true on the cruises we took that the sea takes on strange colors but it didn't look like wine. (Or anything I've ever seen in a bottle, and I DID look continually for the wine dark sea).
The wine-coloured aspect must be thought of as swirling wine in a cup (not distilled)
I am not an oenophile, (or an ophthalmologist) but having just had a thorough grounding in my face to face class on the properties of the proof of wine and distillation of same (of which I knew nothing) I wonder what kind of moonshine hahaa this person is acquainted with?
hahaha Have any of you ever swirled non distilled wine in a cup? I think the possibility among the readers here and of that article in general is probably nil? In the interest of accuracy and fully embracing the story, does anybody want to try making their own?
What a fascinating seque, and POV, thank you for bringing it here, Roshannarose.
This was interesting, Barbara: OH yes, I thought the phrase was familiar - my youngest grandboy reads Patrick O'Brian's series about the sea and one of the books is called:
The Wine-Dark Sea
Look another - Over the Wine Dark Sea by Turteltaub
Do you think that these authors were referring TO Homer's descriptions as a nod to great literature, rather than indicating the seas ARE wine dark? Another example of the influence of Homer? Or not?
Psychology, well we've come to the right place, I keep forgetting Dana is a doctor in this field, so I will rely upon her help us not miss the psychological implications of what we're reading, great point Jude S. I think we're admirably suited for this voyage and I love the enthusiasm here and expertise.
Barbara, you radiate, I love it. Good point on the nurse, I sort of glossed over the nurse as he's got to be 20 at least, but I do think she's also an important character.
Now the would/ could thing on Penelope seems MOST important, thank you for bringing it up, Joan K.
What do your translations all say about Penelope's ability to get rid of these guys? Let's get the lines for easy reference: are we talking about lines 266-267? Lombardo has T say (and T is the one saying it, we've not heard from Penelope) "She refuses to make a marriage she hates/ But can't stop it either."
"They are eating us/
Out of house and home, and will kill me someday."
That's his opinion. What's hers?
Either way, there's a little bit of stress. They are eating US out of house and home and will kill me someday. I'm thinking, Andrea, that any mother who sort of played along with this one is nuts, right?
So what is she doing here, she can't be enjoying this? Barbara asks if she can come out of her quarters, would YOU all want to come out with a house full of cigar smoking drunkards making merry and eating your food day and night? Demanding that you make a decision. Stress, stress, stress.
Joan K says To follow up on the rights of a women during ancient Greece - All houses belonged to men. Women were secluded into part of the house. The only houses that men did not own would have been the temples for the goddesses. The roles the women had in their separate portion of their house included spinning and weaving, cooking, carrying water, cleaning, and serving food. Some women also performed musical instruments and danced. Huh nothing here about raising the children - I bet that was a given.
So what do the suitors need her for?
I still think there's something missing here about how the Greeks ruled their kingdoms.
I think the most striking thing to me so far, the most serious tension or thread is the gods. You don't find too many books starting with a confab of gods deciding on the fate of the characters, nor do you find them taking on disguises and appearing amongst man? Do we? When's the last time you saw the gods all getting together and taking a part in the life of the protagonist?
Isn't there a TV show where that does happen tho? I am also thinking of the old movie with Cary Grant and Loretta Young, The Bishop's Wife where Cary Grant (was it?) appeared as an angel.
But it looks as if this first book has neatly summed up all of the state of being in a capsule. Odysseus (Ulysses) is not dead, he's caught on the way home, the situation meanwhile back at the castle, and not incidentally, the role the gods are going to play in this set out first. What odd gods they are, interfering in the life of man as they do, why is this so up front in the beginning?
Am I the only one with the Greek edition? We need to see, as Sally has put: Pope says Athene has celestial azure eyes. we need to see the Greek word and have our experts here tell us what it actually means?
SandyRose, I also liked the grey sided olive leaf allusion. I have always wanted an olive tree, but was put off by the time they take to bear, NOW last summer I just learned you can't eat them right off the tree at ALL! They HAVE to be processed, who knew?
Jude, those are excellent points, too, male/ female (that's thread #11) and T growing up without a father, good points. So he really has NOT had a male example, his grandfather is off in the mountains, the only males, the suitors, are rowdy and eating them out of house and home, it's a mess. I'm still trying to figure out which is the most predominant stressor, possibly the suitors? Brought on by the absence.
I tend to look at things like this: if the suitors were gone, what would be the stress? How would the story be different by removing this or that stressor?
O being gone might be a setback, but they could (and apparently are) have dealt with that? So it's the suitors, they want the kingdom and she, naturally, does not care for a forced marriage. They don't want to force the issue (why not?) and so things amble along 10 long years, till the gods in the form of (Athena) stir T up. As Book I ends, he promises in the morning (Lombardo has him calling them at the end of Book I "arrogant pigs," he's going to tell them to get out.
Antinous, a suitor, immediately recognizes that T has been prompted "by the gods, " but he's not deterred because he also has a prayer: "May the son of Cronus never make you king/ Here on Ithaca, even if it is your birthright." So it seems it's whoever has the most favor with the gods may win, the fact that T is obviously spoken to by the gods means nothing, as Antinous seems to feel the gods are an EOE.
When you start talking about Cronus you go way back. Cronus was the precursor of the Olympian gods, he was a Titan, children of Uranus and Gaia, Heaven and Earth. These are the oldest creation myth gods. Cronus and his sister Rhea had many children, which Cronus swallowed so as not to be supplanted, but Rhea hid Zeus on Crete when he was born and handed Cronus a stone instead, which he ate. Possibly Cronus was not the brightest bulb in the firmament. I love these old creation stories.
When Zeus grew up he forced Cronus to throw up the stone (now traditionally displayed at Delphi) and all his swallowed siblings. Zeus et al., waged war on the Titans and won, the Titans were consigned to Tartarus. This extraordinary narrative of succession is paralleled among the Phoneticians and the Hittites in the 2nd millennium BC, and it's thought they may have brought it to Greece sometime. Part of it shows the separation of Heaven and Earth. A completely different set of myths has Cronus after he got the kingdom from Uranus ruling in the so called Golden Age on earth, this was almost an Eden. Cronus is "mainly a figure of myth (rather than of religion) and rarely the object of a cult. The Romans identified him with Saturn." (Oxford Companion to Classical Literature).
Cronus is an old god, I love "the son of..." Everything in the Iliad is "the son of" half the time you don't know who you're talking about, also especially strong in Jason, everything is the "son of Aeson." So genealogy does seem to matter.
You really can't help comparing this to Milton's Paradise Lost and another creation of heaven and earth.
We sure have covered a LOT in these opening pages, that's a heck of a lot of plot for 14 pages.
What will happen, one wonders? Shall we read on now and find out? Do we feel confident enough with Book I already? Could we/ should we do 2 and 3 for Monday? I want to see what happens at the meeting the next morning.
What other thoughts do you have on Book I?
Off to a great start!