JoanP an
Babi, clearly, Isobel is far ahead of Eddie in terms of maturity when they first meet. Researchers have long confirmed that girls are wiser as teens than boys of the ame age. After Wales, Eddie attended all-boys schools, and Isobel was his first direct "lontact" with a girl. That's to be expected whe schools are segregated. It's not hard to imagine his reaction. (I haae personal experience with school segregation, but that is immaterial at this point.)
For girls and women, the silent type of man who seems unapproachable, a little exotic, often becomes an object of desire and, sometimes, hopeless love. The latter seems to have been true for Claire, as we see in the two chapters
A Light House in this week's assignment. The story is that of O.F., from the very first chapter we know that Betty and Veneering are important parts of the story. Next we meet the cousins, and, like satelites, all the characters revolve around him.
If that assumption is accurate, does that mean their lives count only to the extent that they touch Edwrd's life ?Babs and Claire are not sisters, and after Auntie May locks up the Dibbs' empty farmhouse, she's going to
deliver the girls to "other people" until their respective parents come from India to claim them. In Babs' case we're not really sure her parents ever came. (I need to look at this again.) The girls were deliberately separated after Wales (and will we ever find out why?), but Babs and Claire were in touch, sporadically, even though they had little in common, it appears, and didn't much like each other. As for the sexual orientation, Babs must have been bisexual because Cumbredge was her lover (she tells Edward), she was married (to Cumbredge
??) and now, roughly the same age as O.F., is in love with a young music student of hers, a "mere boy".
Since we don't know
what happened to the girls after Wales, we could speculate that they may have ended up in the Public/private school with Betty and Isobel. That's where they could have met, and the timing is right.
On questions for the author, the other Gardam books I read were linear. This one gives people pause. But if asked about "methods", would Jane Gardam
share them (if she has any), or would she be offended ? I wonder.