Did he have the authority to sell church property? I knew he refused to live in the palace, citing his strict vows of poverty as a Jesuit, but I find it difficult to believe he could sell it on behalf of the church and future archbishops or cardinals there in Buenos Aires.
Yes, I have heard he is very conservative. And goodness knows, his lineage of Italian and Latin American would enhance that image.
But the Jesuits are the only conduit I can see for real modernization of church dogma.
The church makes the claim it has remained the same for 2,000 years. But that is so untrue, and is like a falsehood they hope if they repeat long enough and enough times that people will believe it. But for 1,000 of those 2,000 years, priests could marry. And priests of the Eastern Sect of the Ukraine, who recognize the Pope in Rome and not the Patriarch in Constantinople, have ALWAYS been able to marry and have children. There was no edict against abortion or birth control until the 20th century! I could go on and on, but bottom line, I see hope for improvement even in this new Pope. If nothing else, if there are no women priests or marriages between the same sex or birth control and so forth, I think he will crack down BIG TIME on molestation of children by the priesthood and the financial scandals within the church. I think he will clean out the stables and make the Church clean and purified.