My niece is working at one of the labs at Harvard. She is not working on the Ebola project, but something that has to do with neurons in the brain.
Neither of my sisters are overly concerned about Ebola here. In fact, one has given me the "why are you upset/afraid (an exaggeration on her part)" since I, personally, am not anywhere near Ebola. What an attitude. Because I am interested in and have an opinion I am afraid? I am concerned for public safety, lack of enough knowledge about the Ebola virus, and the extraordinary measures needed to combat it. I do believe in erring on the safe side until more is known rather than having a caviler attitude about it. Caution, common sense, and interest in the subject are not the same thing as being afraid. So what do we have? We have three groups of people: those who are totally unconcerned/uninterested, those who panic, and the majority of us (I hope) that keep an eye on developments and are interested but not panicky.
Sorry about the rant.
Oh, my other sister, the nurse, read The Hot Zone when it came out. She also read The Plague (sorry, didn't get the author's name). She liked that non-fiction book better for the information about viruses. I'm thinking she didn't have the entire title because I can't locate a non-fiction work by just that name. However, I did find an interesting title that may be relevant to the public and political actions and reactions to a plague here today, Plague, Fear, and Politics in San Francisco's Chinatown by Guenter Risse.