We really do have to bear in mind, don't we, that one of the primary
techniques in writing a good mystery, is to variously point the finger
of suspicion at just about everyone and try to mislead the reader/sleuth.
I'm finding it very hard to separate perceptions from facts. More than
once I've accepted as fact what was presented to me, only to discover
that it wasn't so. Ms. Goodman has been very clever at telling us what
happened, while allowing us to make assumptions about why.
I agree with GUM; Sopie's perception of Elgin is skewed by their history.
She is not a reliable 'reporter' where he is concerned.
We all seem to agree that Maria's family emergency was a sham. But why
would she make up such a story in order to go report to the Church. She
is there as a Church representative, and reporting to them would be
natural and appropriate. No,...she must have been doing something else.
DEEMS, I don't think that Sophie was
'leading us down the garden path'. She did not originally specify the timing of her affair in her 'thoughts',but
there was no reason she should. We just 'assumed',..and that was the author's
clever doing.
JoanR
And how could she "fall into his arms" after his 5 years of desertion and silence? No way!
Remember, Joan, Sophie blamed herself for Ely's going away. She was sure it was
because he learned of her affair. As the 'guilty' party, she would have welcomed
his 'forgiveness'. Sophie is all too inclined to doubt and question herself, IMO,
except where her professional knowledge is involved.