E.L. Doctorow was interviewed yesterday on Booktv and he talked about his theory that "history" was all "storytelling" - he mentioned Homer, the writers of the Old and New Testaments, etc. - until the Enlightenment when Galileo and others decided that you had to observe and prove truth in order for something to be called "history," or true ............Earlier in the week I saw a program on PBS titled "The Truth about Wikipedia" which presented both sides of the argument that you do/don't have to be a "professional" to know the truth about something and that the theory of Wiki is that everybody has knowledge and "truth" and should be able to post what they know. AND is there such a thing as "truth?" When we look at all the books that have been written about many public figures and events and the way they often disagree w/ each other, or a new one comes out w/ "additional/new" information about the person or situation, it is a striking question. How can it be possible that after 1000,s of books written about Lincoln for 150 yrs, that there are still books being published w/ "new" information? Were those previous 1000 books untrue?
Would make for a very interesting discussion, as it did on the Wiki show. I think Wikipedia is terrific and i have found that most of what i read there is accurate - as far as we know "accurate", but i guess that shows my liberal bias and my thinking that credentials are not absolutely necessary for a person to be knowledgable, or an "expert" about something. I had a great argument w/ the vp of the college where i worked when she insisted that a person had to have a degree specifically in the discipline of the subject in order to be able to teach. I pointed out to her that in the 70's, 80's and 90's and even today, there are a lot of people who taught/can teach women's/Black history, etc., who never had an opportunity to get a degree in those disciplines, because there were NO degrees in those disciplines when the courses were started in the late 20th century.
I think that's one of the things i like about seniorlearn - we share ideas and expertise and don't have any idea, in many cases, what the background is of the person providing ideas or insight. Of course, we are a small community who can largely trust that someone isn't attempting to pull the wool over our eyes - there really isn't any reason for someone to do that. ................what i nice feeling!....................jean