Author Topic: The Library  (Read 2080843 times)

Fran

  • Posts: 1657
Re: The Library
« Reply #22360 on: April 04, 2021, 08:57:56 PM »
As I was reading some of the last posts, I realized I was doing it wrong by following the last number I saw posted. We’re each supposed to start with book number one, two etc.I’m so sorry. I’ll continue to just read your posts as you continue.They’re all so interesting!

PatH

  • BooksDL
  • Posts: 10952
Re: The Library
« Reply #22361 on: April 04, 2021, 09:17:07 PM »
Actually, the rules don't seem to be very rigid.   Feel free to add books or not whenever you feel like it.  But if you think of an eleven, we could sure use another one.

Frybabe

  • Posts: 10029
Re: The Library
« Reply #22362 on: April 05, 2021, 06:50:52 AM »
Every Fifteen Minutes by Lisa Scottoline

ginny

  • Administrator
  • Posts: 91472
Re: The Library
« Reply #22363 on: April 05, 2021, 09:50:51 AM »
Good heavens here I am on 9 and it appears we're on 16!!! WHOOP! Who KNEW?

No no no,  Fran, that's not a rule, feel free to jump right in where ever you are when you see it.

Today we're on 16.

As Pat says there are no hard and fast rules. If I personally had to do 9-15 I'd be sitting in the corner cross eyed. I couldn't think of 9 until this very minute, 9 Tailors, has that been said?   YES! Pat said it.  Makes no difference today we're on 16.

What to bet there's a book called 16 Candles?  Why is 16 supposed to be such a pivotal age?


PatH

  • BooksDL
  • Posts: 10952
Re: The Library
« Reply #22364 on: April 05, 2021, 10:04:11 AM »
As nearly as I can figure out, the story of Sixteen Candles was written for the movie.  There must be some titles about sweet sixteen, but I can't think of any.

Frybabe

  • Posts: 10029
Re: The Library
« Reply #22365 on: April 06, 2021, 06:47:37 AM »
Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City by K. J. Parker (aka: Tom Holt) who tends to write humorous fantasy

ginny

  • Administrator
  • Posts: 91472
Re: The Library
« Reply #22366 on: April 06, 2021, 07:47:46 AM »
HA!! Good one! Is it any good? I like Tom Holt who also wrote the two Mapp and Lucia sequels.

PatH

  • BooksDL
  • Posts: 10952
Re: The Library
« Reply #22367 on: April 06, 2021, 08:14:52 AM »
that gave my morning chuckle, Frybabe.  And I have a seventeen waiting its turn.

Seventeen, by Booth Tarkington

Tarkington's humorous books mostly dealt with a younger boy, but this one is laughing at adolescent first love.  Written pre-WWI, the books seemed dated and not that interesting to me seventy five years ago.  I wonder what I would think of them now.

Fran

  • Posts: 1657
Re: The Library
« Reply #22368 on: April 06, 2021, 02:23:24 PM »
Thanks for the responses,, it is getting harder as you get into the higher numbers. I enjoy reading your posts.

Frybabe

  • Posts: 10029
Re: The Library
« Reply #22369 on: April 06, 2021, 05:47:26 PM »
It sounds good, Ginny. I have it and its sequel, How to Rule an Empire and Get Away With It in my Audible wish list, hoping it goes on sale.

I finally, finally finished the audio book about the Silk Road (which went way broader than that) by Peter Frankopan. He is a 'bit' critical of the British and the US involvement in the Middle East especially since the 70s. And now, just when we become oil independent, the Biden bunch are going to make us oil dependent again until we increase our renewable energy output sufficiently. So, I guess the behind the scene shenanigans will continue. Forgive me one of my rare political comments.

I laughed myself silly listening to The Adventures of Tom Strange, Interdimentional Insurance Agent. It was written by Larry Correia and narrated perfectly by Adam Baldwin (who played Jane in Firefly).

rosemarykaye

  • Posts: 3055
Re: The Library
« Reply #22370 on: April 07, 2021, 03:37:45 AM »
I am struggling with these numbers now!

I have finished Agatha Christie's Murder in Mesopotamia, which I thought was just OK. I always feel I'm missing something with Christie - her plots so often rely on some person reappearing from the past without being recognised, and this one really did take the biscuit. I enjoyed the location and the details of the archaeological party though.

I decided to try to read South Riding in time for the #1936Club reading week. I was initially daunted by its 500+ pages, but so far it has been an enjoyable and relatively easy read, so fingers crossed. I remember the 1970s TV adaptation with Dorothy Tutin as Sarah Burton. We were all glued to it every week,  The more recent one with Anna Maxwell Martin and David Morrissey was also good. On reading the actual book though, I am more taken with the persona of Midge, Carne's lonely, 'hysterical', daughter. She reminds me of Janet in Elspeth Barker's wonderful O Caledonia.

More snow this morning - for the third day running. My friend and I have abandoned our original walking plan, and are going to do something a bit closer to home. April 7th and we're still having to think about ice!

Frybabe

  • Posts: 10029
Re: The Library
« Reply #22371 on: April 07, 2021, 06:57:20 AM »
The only thing I can think of with seventeen in the title is Stevie Nick's song, Edge of Seventeen.

PatH

  • BooksDL
  • Posts: 10952
Re: The Library
« Reply #22372 on: April 07, 2021, 12:20:34 PM »
Possibilities are getting scarce.  I don't have eighteen or nineteen, but I have the next two.

Twenty years After, by Alexandre Dumas.  It comes before Ten Years Later.

21, by Patrick O'Brian.  When author O'Brian died, he was working on the 21st book of his Master and Commander series about British naval officer Jack Aubrey and his friend, the ship's doctor and spy, Stephen Maturin.  The typescript fragment was published, along with a facsimile of the handwritten manuscript, which takes the story a little farther.  The American version was titled 21, though I think it had a longer title in the UK.

I discovered the series when O'Brian was somewhere in the middle, and eagerly devoured them, getting the remaining ones as they came out.  Aubrey is loosely based on a real person, Thomas Cochrane, but O'Brian had to tone things down somewhat, because many of the things Cochrane did were so improbable you couldn't get away with them in fiction.

I haven't read 21.  It's a pretty short fragment, and Aubrey started turning stuffy after he got to be an admiral.

rosemarykaye

  • Posts: 3055
Re: The Library
« Reply #22373 on: April 07, 2021, 01:09:27 PM »
I agree Pat!

I have thought of 22 - Catch 22 by Joseph Heller.

And going back to 16, Debbie Macomber has lots of house numbers in her endless Cedar Cove series, and one of them is 16 Lighthouse Road.

I think I've peaked...  ;D

Frybabe

  • Posts: 10029
Re: The Library
« Reply #22374 on: April 08, 2021, 06:34:28 AM »
18 Tiny Deaths: The Untold Story of the Woman Who Invented Modern Forensics by Bruce Goldfarb

Nineteen Minutes by Judy Picoult
No big surprise that there are a ton COVID-19 related books out there. I don't plan on reading any of them.

20 Years After and Catch-22 are both in my TBR piles.

BTW, did anyone do a zero? Tau Zero by Paul Anderson.

Twenty-One Steps: Guarding the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier by Jeff Gottesfeld and Matt Tavares. Just published in February, I ran across the title a week or so ago. It is written for youngsters, so it didn't make any of my reading lists.

Fran

  • Posts: 1657
Re: The Library
« Reply #22375 on: April 08, 2021, 10:24:21 AM »

Towards Zero-by Agatha Christie
Nineteenth Wire-D.Ebersgoff-a woman’s crusade against polygamy

Fran

  • Posts: 1657
Re: The Library
« Reply #22376 on: April 08, 2021, 10:26:16 AM »

Error-above is nineteenth “wife”.

ginny

  • Administrator
  • Posts: 91472
Re: The Library
« Reply #22377 on: April 09, 2021, 07:32:39 AM »
 I cheated and looked this one up because I have a 24. hahahaha

23 Miles and Running: My American journey from chopping cotton in the Mississippi Delta to sleeping in the White House

Actually sounds pretty good. Maybe we should all pick one from all these books that we have not read and read it.

But my 22 I thought I remembered turned out to be 2,  for Pete's sake, but LOOK what the sequel is titled!

Yay!

Two Years Before the Mast and Twenty-Four Years After. I did not know there was a sequel!

That TWO Years  Before the Mast was a good book, as I recall, and  in retrospect it's ridiculous to even assume anybody would have written a book 22 Years Before the Mast. hahaha

25 is up next.

Don't forget the 15th!! And Virginia Woolf!


PatH

  • BooksDL
  • Posts: 10952
Re: The Library
« Reply #22378 on: April 09, 2021, 08:49:21 AM »
Rosemary, I see we've lost Prince Philip.  My condolences.

PatH

  • BooksDL
  • Posts: 10952
Re: The Library
« Reply #22379 on: April 09, 2021, 08:57:39 AM »
Everyone's coming to the rescue, more successfully than I would have thought.  Whenever it stops being fun, we quit.  I suspect there will be a lot of holes from now on.

Frybabe

  • Posts: 10029
Re: The Library
« Reply #22380 on: April 09, 2021, 12:39:56 PM »
Sorry to hear about Prince Albert. My condolences to the UK.

Dana wrote several books including a vacation voyage to Cuba, To Cuba and Back.. I am almost positive that it is buried in my E-book TBR pile. After his trip described in Two Years..., Dana became a lawyer. Because of the book, he was especially sought after in Maritime law, one case even making it to the Supreme Court. He must have made an impression in California because they named no less than five schools after him, two libraries, and a road.  You might be able to tell that Mr. Dana impressed me mightily, so it is a surprise to me that I never read any of his other books.

I'll skip 22, but I do have a 23 from one of my favorite authors, Beacon 23 by Hugh Howey. Although it is a science fiction books, it is about a veteran with what appears to be PTSD. Very good book.

Mr. Penumbra's 24-hour Bookstore by Robin Sloan.

Fran

  • Posts: 1657
Re: The Library
« Reply #22381 on: April 09, 2021, 01:18:33 PM »

Rosemary, I’ve always had a great interest in the Royal Family. So to hear about the lost of Prince Philip.

Fran

  • Posts: 1657
Re: The Library
« Reply #22382 on: April 09, 2021, 01:22:41 PM »
 
Can I ever get anything right the first time. Let me repeat my last sentence, Rosemary.  So sorry to hear about the lost of Prince Philip.

Fran

  • Posts: 1657
Re: The Library
« Reply #22383 on: April 09, 2021, 01:42:12 PM »


Look Alive twenty five-by Janet Evanovich in large print, which I haven’t received yet from the Library.

Also “25” by Rachel Hamm , I’m undecided about purchasing foot my Kindle reader.

Fran

  • Posts: 1657
Re: The Library
« Reply #22384 on: April 09, 2021, 01:45:01 PM »


“For my kindle reader on iPad”.—for my above post.

rosemarykaye

  • Posts: 3055
Re: The Library
« Reply #22385 on: April 10, 2021, 02:23:37 PM »
Hi everyone. Thanks for your comments re Prince Philip.

As some of you may recall, I am not a huge fan of the royal family myself, but it is of course sad for the Queen.  Prince Edward's wife Sophie (Countess of Wessex) went to see her at Windsor this morning, and reportedly said she (ie HRH) was 'being amazing.'

We've been watching The Crown (months after all of you!) these past few weeks, and although I know they always say it is fiction, it certainly does make you think about how much the Queen has probably had to put up with over the years, one way and another. We're just passed the part where Margaret is finally 25 and thinks she can marry Peter Townsend, only for the Queen to be told that, although Margaret has waited 2 years as required by whatever the legislation says, 'Parliament will still never allow it.' No-one had advised them (ie neither the Queen nor Princess Margaret) of this before.  The Queen is also given a bossy lecture by the top bishops. I really do think the MPs had a nerve - as HRH herself points out, at least four members of the Cabinet (inner sanctum of the government) were divorced, but of course it was one rule for them and another for the royals (and also for women...)

So now we have wall-to-wall royal stuff on every single terrestial TV channel and all of the BBC Radio stations. Yesterday they actually put the very same programme on all day on all channels. I'm afraid many people, including me, defected to Netflix and/or DVDs.  There is an interesting article today - possibly in The Guardian - about the public reaction to this saturation broadcasting. It seems all of the main channels viewer numbers dropped last night, and the BBC received a vast number of complaints, not about the programmes themselves, but the fact that they were on every single channel. The article said this raised many questions about the attitudes of the nation in the 21st century; people have much more choice now, and they probably have a lot less interest in the royals. There is a part of the older generation (ie older even than me) who still follow every move of the royal family with devotion, but even in that age group not everyone is too bothered, and in younger generations there just isn't the interest that there was 50+ years ago.

Which isn't to say that we don't all watch The Crown, but that's rather more gripping, as it purports to show what went on behind closed doors, which is something the royals themselves never ever reveal (though Meghan and Harry have maybe changed that.)

And a woman jockey has today won the Grand National (one of the most famous events in the English horseracing year).

Interesting times.

Frybabe

  • Posts: 10029
Re: The Library
« Reply #22386 on: April 11, 2021, 05:02:23 PM »
Michael Vey: The Prisoner of Cell 25 by Richard Paul Evans. The series got good reviews a few years back. I thought about getting it once upon a time but never did. It is written for Teens.

ginny

  • Administrator
  • Posts: 91472
Re: The Library
« Reply #22387 on: April 12, 2021, 09:37:29 AM »
Yes I personally was very sorry to hear that Prince Philip had died, although at 99 one knows the time is coming. I am aware he was controversial but personally I  wish he had made it to his birthday. Imagine a 73 year marriage!!   I am very glad The Crown came out which gave another side to his background, and childhood, whether or not it was fiction, I have a feeling he did a lot more than people think.  I liked his desire not for a fuss in a funeral.  I do like the idea of putting up a register online so all people can say  if they wish, some positive  memory of him which might be something unknown and  comforting to those left behind. I have been touched by some of the entries.

Vesta

  • ^
  • Posts: 877
  • Audaces fortuna iuvat. Fortuna Eruditis Favet.
    • https://sites.google.com/site/paweeyabinbon/home/vesta-god-of-the-home
Re: The Library
« Reply #22388 on: April 13, 2021, 12:25:32 PM »
One good thing to come of Prince Phillip's passing is pointing to his example of duty and service.  From documentaries I've seen he was very much a doer, just get on with what you have to and not feel sorry for yourself.  He also in the 1950's expressed concern for the environment that was not popular then.
Through studying, reading, writing, and loving Latin, we step into the river of history, and there we find a deeper understanding of where we began and where we want to go.

Frybabe

  • Posts: 10029
Re: The Library
« Reply #22389 on: April 14, 2021, 08:10:52 AM »
So sad to hear of Prince Philip's passing. Like many of you he and Queen Elizabeth have been a fixture for most of my life. I agree with Vesta. He has been a steady influence. It almost feels like an anchor has been pulled. My condolences to the Royal family and the country.


The Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet by Jeff Kosseff. The title refers to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

ginny

  • Administrator
  • Posts: 91472
Re: The Library
« Reply #22390 on: April 15, 2021, 11:05:53 AM »
Well today appears to be the big day of our first book club discussion in a long time, Virginia Woolfs A  Room of One's Own. Many thanks to Dana for suggesting this book.


 We have no Leader here, and it's YOU who will direct what we talk about. I will admit I read Chapter One  yesterday quite late at night in a rush but several things stood out to me, and I wonder what your first impression was or what YOU want to talk about in that first chapter?

I was not an admirer of Virginia Woof but I have to say she writes lyrically and at the end of the chapter had succeeded in arousing my admiration for her beautiful writing. Even if I am not sure what it is she is referencing, especially there at the last as, alas, my cheap Kindle edition does not have any references in it or commentary, so I must rely upon you all with better editions to fill in some of these gaps and questions.

What struck ME immediately was her feeling of being an "outsider," on the outside looking in, the feeling of loneliness I got from her pages and it took me quite a while to realize why that had happened. What, if any, the point was. What the book is actually about? Is it too  soon to ask? I  don't know what the title means, either.

What is the point so far? In your opinion?   IF I understand her and I may not? What did YOU get out of these opening pages? What do YOU want to talk about? We have no leader here or I certainly am not prepared to be one, what struck YOU?

 She writes of Oxbridge. I spent (which I am sure you are sick of hearing about) a short time in residence in the student rooms at Christ Church Oxford in a summer course there and much of what she is writing about so beautifully I could not begin to have echoed, but she has captured the Oxford part, those Harry Potter halls, the ambiance very well, and also  about those doors shutting, but I did not take it personally. Perhaps I should have.

I have looked this much up: "Oxbridge is a portmanteau of Oxford and Cambridge, the two oldest, wealthiest, and most famous universities in the United Kingdom. As of 2018, less than 1% of individuals applying to undergraduate courses through UCAS were admitted to these institutions."

 I have no experience with Cambridge, other than visiting,  but I think she is talking about a greater issue, and I will be glad to have my ignorance illuminated. :)

(I do have to admit  that I have a thing about white space and paragraphs and I did think for a minute that it would not be amiss to include some...when the text goes on and on without any break at all I really get kind of tense, wondering when in fact we are going to get to the point. When did we?)

The floor is open for your thoughts and I am sure they are better than mine but those are my honest first impressions. What have I missed?


Vesta

  • ^
  • Posts: 877
  • Audaces fortuna iuvat. Fortuna Eruditis Favet.
    • https://sites.google.com/site/paweeyabinbon/home/vesta-god-of-the-home
Re: The Library
« Reply #22391 on: April 15, 2021, 11:17:45 AM »
The Britishisms or 1920's style English initially put me off.  I wondered why she was so concerned about the quality of dinner served in the university dining halls but I came to realize her point is the inequality of how men and women are treated because men (at that time) had all the money and power while women were tied down by child-bearing and rearing and men controlled their money if they had any.  So Woolf is an early feminist (though she is part of the British upper class system benefiting from the labor of the servant class) pointing out women need space and time (room of their own) based on inherited wealth unencumbered by having children in order to create literature (women really needed birth control).
Through studying, reading, writing, and loving Latin, we step into the river of history, and there we find a deeper understanding of where we began and where we want to go.

Dana

  • ::
  • Posts: 5349
Re: The Library
« Reply #22392 on: April 15, 2021, 12:36:51 PM »
Yes, Oxbridge I thought was supposed to be a sort of amalgamation of Oxford and Cambridge and in the first chapter (which I have not had time to reread and first read a month or two ago) I thought she was kind of moaning on about being treated differently because she is female and I found it quite irritating after a while...enough already....we know it's like that, just get on the whatever you are trying to say....but then when I watched the beginning of the BBC program (with Eileen Atkins...the one I mentioned) I got a totally different feeling.  I guess she played it for humour and sarcasm and I really like that take and she had me chuckling at the absurdity of it all.  Especially not being allowed on the grass (hope that is in first chapter!)
I noticed that she did not specifically mention childbearing....and I did wonder if/when she was going to, because it seems to me a no brainer that having constant pregnancies and bringing up the surviving children for about 20 years is totally responsible for the lack of female writers, scientists, statesmen etc etc from the beginning of time up until the advent of the pill, really.


Vesta

  • ^
  • Posts: 877
  • Audaces fortuna iuvat. Fortuna Eruditis Favet.
    • https://sites.google.com/site/paweeyabinbon/home/vesta-god-of-the-home
Re: The Library
« Reply #22393 on: April 15, 2021, 03:26:39 PM »
Yes, the incident where Woolf is chased off the grass is in chapter one.  I learned a new word--beadle: "BRITISH--a ceremonial officer of a church, college, or similar institution."  She was also refused entry to the college library; I guess they feared she might distract men from their scholarly pursuits.

She does mention childbearing as a hindrance to women when she noted a couple of times how difficult it was for women to gather the money to establish a women's college because childbearing prohibited them from careers.  She seemed to me scandalized at a woman who bore 13 children to ministers of religion at St. Andrews (I guess she thought ministers should be monks).
Through studying, reading, writing, and loving Latin, we step into the river of history, and there we find a deeper understanding of where we began and where we want to go.

PatH

  • BooksDL
  • Posts: 10952
Re: The Library
« Reply #22394 on: April 15, 2021, 03:55:09 PM »
I’m having loads of fun with this, and have lots to say, but it’ll have to wait until I get home from the dentist—my reward for finally being fully vaccinated is I get to catch up on things like this.

Frybabe

  • Posts: 10029
Re: The Library
« Reply #22395 on: April 15, 2021, 05:11:15 PM »
I go for my first shot on the 26th. Still not fond of the idea.


PatH

  • BooksDL
  • Posts: 10952
Re: The Library
« Reply #22396 on: April 16, 2021, 10:07:54 AM »
Good morning, everyone.  I think you have to be in the right mood when you read this book, or it would probably drive you nuts with its apparent randomness and scattershot topics.  I was very much in the right mood, and had a blast.  As well as the quality of the writing, there are many clever references, some of which I understand, and low key but amusing jokes, some of which I catch.  I'm pretty sure I see where she's going, and will enjoy the trip, whether I end up agreeing with her or not.

Dana, I'm glad you're listening to it, because I wondered if the lectures would work, or if things would pass by too quickly for the audience to get.  Obviously it does quite well when spoken aloud.  The first chapter ends when she goes back to her inn, and rolls up the crumpled skin of the day, casts it into the hedge, and goes to sleep.

ginny

  • Administrator
  • Posts: 91472
Re: The Library
« Reply #22397 on: April 16, 2021, 12:00:23 PM »
I'm not sure I understand what's going on in this piece.  Is the speaker the author herself? I haven't watched the film version yet but I like Eileen Atkins so much she would totally I think change what I am seeing in the book especially if she took the events in Chapter 1 with humor.

And this narrator  has been asked to give a speech somewhere? At two colleges? And I think my book says one of them is Newnham?  A women's college at Cambridge. Didn't Mary Beard the classicist attend Newnham and teaches there now? Boy I would love to hear her opinion of this.

And so in her position as guest speaker she thought to visit the library or this or that place and was not allowed in,  unless she was with XXX or YYY (and is the point made, I need to reread there) that they are men? And  she could not come in and in another instance needed to get off the grass.

So I guess this person is one of some renown and who feels entitled? Or angry about not being entitled? or respected?  ....I guess I'm not very entitled in  personality. When I go to a library and they say there is no access (which they do in Oxford)   or they say get off the grass I get off the grass and think nothing of it.

But I live in a different time. Is that it? Or that I'm not famous (was she in this piece, and how can we tell?)  of her renown? Would a man have also been turned away without one of those people with him as well?  Wouldn't a man be asked to get off the grass as well?  I'm trying to say  is this a manifesto about Women's Rights? I don't know what it is, to be honest. It's beautiful writing, nobody can deny that, albeit with no paragraphs to speak of.

I REALLY sense a lonely person here.  REALLY. Is it just me? Maybe I need to read it again. What's the...theme? Who is the speaker? What is happening? Is it the time she lives in?

I have traveled overseas for many years, often by myself,  and the only time I can recall getting angry at being told no (which I hear quite a lot) was this last trip and ...oh well it's too long to tell. But it wasn't a woman/ man issue. PERHAPS if I had been Tony Blair the man would have reacted differently? Or Lord Whatnot? Should I become embittered over that?  I thought he was rude, period,  and he's lucky I did not tell him off.

Maybe it's the times WE live in that have altered our thinking about these issues?

rosemarykaye

  • Posts: 3055
Re: The Library
« Reply #22398 on: April 16, 2021, 12:22:13 PM »
So sorry, I thought for some reason that we were starting this today - but even if I hadn't thought that, I'd not have got to it till today, as I was desperately finishing South Riding, which - hurrah! - I have done, and written the review. I loved this book.

So now on to Virginia. I took my little Bloomsbury Classics copy out with me this morning, and sat on a log in the woods to read it. Blue skies, birdsong, lovely.

What she is on about, in my opinion, is the imbalance between the sexes - which was of course much more pronounced in her time, but still very much exists today. I don't think she is denigrating the minister's wife who has 13 children, she is just saying that that rate of procreation doesn't leave you much time for anything else - and Seton's mother was not poor, she would have had help, even if not as much as would have been on offer to Woolf, had she ever had a child.

The reason she describes those meals in such detail is to point up the difference between the extremely well endowed men's colleges and the extremely poor women's ones. This is still the case today, even though almost all of the formerly all-female colleges at Oxbridge are now mixed. Places like Girton (the slightly less prestigious women's college - now mixed - at Cambridge) will never have the kind of resources that, eg, Trinity or St John's enjoy, because they are much newer, and the women who started them did, indeed, have a hell of a time getting past the conservatism that said women should not be educated in the first place.
They were also often located outwith the town, partly because the men's colleges had already used mosyt of the land up, partly because the land out the way was cheaper, and partly, I am sure, to protect the female students' morals. Newnham College in Cambridge is an exception, in that it is within walking distance of the centre, It was always seen as the most academic of the all women colleges, and has certainly produced a lot of famous alumnae. Nevertheless, inside it still felt like a girls' boarding school.

Oxbridge is very much a term still in use here. At school we were asked if we intended to apply to Oxbridge - the choice of which of the two universities, and which college at that university, could be then be made.

And the not walking on the grass thing is still a thing too!  Woolf is actually told not to walk on it becasue she is not a Fellow, not primarily because she is female, though of course the beadle (often called a porter) would have instantly known that she could not have been a fellow, because she was the wrong sex (at that time). In my own college, the only people allowed to walk on the front lawn are fellows and graduates. Hence I can now do so - but was still chased by a porter last time I did (as soon as I showed him my membership card he was very apologetic, and of course it wasn't his fault, the place is overrun with tourists). However, in King's Chapel it would now be unlikley that anyone would be denied access to a service, unless it was a private thing - maybe a funeral or something - or one of the Christmas services, which are so busy that they have to be ticketed. Re the college library, that would definitely be a members' only place - partly because it is meant to be for study, not sightseeing, and partly because some of the old libraries have some extremely valuable tomes on the shelves. These days they probably have barriers and alarms, but when i was there they certainly didn't, so it was up to the librarian to check who was going in and out.

I found the description of the parsimonious tea back at Mary Seton's college very convincing. It smacked to me of Barbara Pym (who was an undergraduate at St Hilda's College, Oxford in the early 1930s). The catering at the old men's colleges would still be extremely lavish for special dinners, and most have some sort of High Table every night (though not with particularly smart food) as well as an earlier cafeteria style option.

(And speaking of Pym, Radio 4 is currently serialising a new biography by Paula Byrne 'The Adventures of Miss Barbara Pym'.  I was a bit cynical about this at first - I felt that Hazel Holt [Pym's friend and literary executor] had done such a good job with the one she published in 1990 that I didn't think there could be much to add. I also hadn't really liked Byrne's book about Evelyn Waugh. However, from the second instalment onwards this seems to have a lot of new material - I wonder if this is partly because Holt, as a longtime friend and contemporary of Pym's, would never have revealed things that Barbara might not have wanted revealed, whereas Byrne is neither so has a freer hand? So we learn that Pym had an active sex life from the time she arrived in Oxford - which I imagine was quite unusual for a middle class girl from the provinces at that time. She also had quite an interest in Nazi Germany for a while, until she realised what Nazism entailed.)

And going back to VW, one of my beefs with her is that she understands all of these important things, but she still can't resist those snobby little comments:

'These houses...raw and red and squalid, with their sweets and their bootlaces...'

I have only read the first chapter so far. When will we move on to the next one? Next Thursday?

Thanks for suggesting this Dana, it's very interesting.

rosemarykaye

  • Posts: 3055
Re: The Library
« Reply #22399 on: April 16, 2021, 12:40:25 PM »
I forgot to say, I have also started listening to Nora Webster on BBC Sounds. It is an adaptation of the novel by Colm Toibin, set in his own home town of Enniscorthy in the early 1960s. I haven't read it, or indeed any of his work, (apparently he also wrote Brooklyn, which was turned into the successful film) but the first episode was wonderful and I am looking forward to the rest (the second should've been tomorrow but has apparently been postponed because of the royal funeral...)

The peerless Siobhan McSweeney plays Nora, a woman whose husband has just died. She must now be a single parent to her two sons, still at home, and her two daughters, one at college and one away at boarding school. She must also negotiate her own grief, and her own fury at what has happened.  And she must deal with financial matters - by selling the family's holiday cottage, and going back to work. There is a great cast of supporting characters and the story is just what would happen in small town Ireland - everyone in the area insists on dropping in on the family, ostensibly to express their condolences, but actually to have a good nose - one even asks her if she is selling the holiday cottage (before she has thought about it) and if so can  her own son have it? She has to engage with people she hasn't had to deal with since they were all at school - such as the annoying girl, now a bitter woman, who is now in charge of the firm she once worked for, and is determined to make Nora's life difficult.