Ah, sorry, MARYPAGE. I didn't realize the discussion was strictly on economics.
Consider my comments a sideline.
Another intriguing list; at least I've read most of these. All but the Orwell and
that particular Baldwin, and James Joyce. I probably should read something by Joyce, I know he's considered great, but I simply cringe from the hard work of coping with his writing style.
Jeans for a wedding?
Is that the mod thing now, KIWI? I am so 'out of it'!
It has always irritated me, CAROLYN, that the ones who get most of the tax breaks are the ones who least need it. I decline to take seriously any of the American senators who claim to act in the public interest re. out national debt. If
they were sincere, they'd start with their own outrageous and shameful salaries. GRR!!
which I take to mean there is something about each which adds to the education of the reader. This something should be the power and insight in the writing itself
.
Imposing one's own yardsticks on whatever one reads is bound to influence how one sees the result. I can well imagine the library staff might have had a quite different 'must read' definition in mind.
I do agree with your take on C. S. Lewis and other 'fantasy' writers. One reason I like them so much is that they deal with the struggle between good and evil.
There, happily, good does prevail, though always at a cost.