Oh, good, JOANP. You found an example of one of those overly elaborate beds. It doesn't
look very restful, does it? I tried looking up 'lit de parade', and found the general
meaning was one of those altar like biers where important persons lie in state while the
masses of mourners pass by. I can imagine the deceased royalty of the Renaissance lying
in such a funeral bed.
We know Charles was a target for the vituperation of some of the anti-Semites of the day.
De Waal quotes some of the diarists and journalists who were obviously miffed at Charles
free entree into the fashionable world. It mattered not in the least that he was charming,
wealthy, knowledgeable in art and fashion. That just added fuel to the fire of resentment.
Reading the second and third chapters, I feel I have been invited to step into a world and time that is colorful, exciting, and filled with beautiful, exotic things. I am very glad to have such an able escort, however, when we venture into the fashionable salons of the day, which are described as
"a minefield of fiercely contested geographies of political, artistic, religious and aristocratic taste." I don't doubt that his being a contributing writer to the most fashionable art magazine of the day contributes to my escort's warm welcome there.
Like today, such magazines cover all the social events, including the list of who was there and what they were wearing. And of course, for those 'in the know', the list was a "
calibration of snubs and fine judgments." The key, I presume, being who wasn't on the list.
I did find the portrait of Charles' mistress.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bonnat15.jpg Bonnet did the one of Charles Ephrussi also. I suppose the traditional course among wealthy families of marrying for dynastic purposes had much to do with the polite acceptance of love affairs among them.