Oh, yes
JoanG - everything you said made perfect sense - and I'm sure some of those struggling along with you feel the same way. Hopefully you will be rewarded for your perseverance. Let me assure you - the clouds lift, the sun comes out - as soon as we make our way through the many ideas crammed into the Camellias chapters - and move on to the chapters on "Grammar".
But understanding what is being said in "Camellias" is so important in understanding what is to come.
Which character do you find easier to get to know - or harder to understand? We are seeing similarities between the two - but real differences too.
This is from an interview with the author (not the one I'm looking for, but I thought you might appreciate it) :
Your concierge, on the other hand, is an expert on Tolstoy, but also on philosophy. And even the teenaged Paloma, in her own way, expresses a propensity for abstract speculation.
“I followed a long, boring course of studies in philosophy. I expected it to help me understand better that which surrounds me: but it didn’t work out that way. Literature has taught me more. I was interested in exploring the bearing philosophy could really have on one’s life, and how. I wanted to illuminate this process. That’s where the desire to anchor philosophy to a story, a work of fiction, was born: to give it more meaning, make it more physically real, and render it, perhaps, even entertaining.”
Nouvelle Philosophe: Interview with Muriel Barbery
Eloise - thank you for this important information -
A ‘Certificat d’Étude Primaire’ marks the end of primary schooling in France."
Would that make Renée the same age as Paloma is now when she began her"education"? I think it might - but how very different they are at this age!
Jude suggests the possibility that M. Barbery is basing her Paloma's character on herself at that age. Barbery herself points out in the interview that Paloma expresses a propensity for abstract speculation."
From her writing, I wouldn't be at all surprised if this didn't describe the author at this age. Notice that she doesn't say that Paloma is well read - but she certainly has "a propensity for speculation" on that which she observes. We can see that in her notebooks.
Laura's post reminds us that Paloma thinks she has reached the level of a senior in college. I wonder where she gets this idea? Has she been tested? Is there such a test? She may have gone off the charts on an IQ test, but that doesn't mean she has accomplished college level work. I think this is an adolescent speaking - who feels insecure because she is so unlike others of her own age.
I agree with
Babi - despite her intelligence, she has much to learn.
I thought the interview was revealing- Barbery writes - "I followed a long, boring course of studies in philosophy. I expected it to help me understand better that which surrounds me: but it didn’t work out that way. Literature has taught me more."
I thought that was very funny - coming from a professor of philosophy as she is! The comment sounds like it could come from our concierge, doesn't it?
Babi, you clearly stated for us that which Renée got from her study of Kant - that there is nothing beyond this world and what can be
learned and experienced within it.
Kant's primary influence on her education is simply that she enjoyed
reading him so much and gained confidence in her ability to grasp whatever she
chose to study. And that she did!
Is this the lesson that Paloma has yet to learn?