Steph, am interested in your total reaction to that book after reading it. Made a decision, once upon a good while ago, not to get into Follett. Then a beloved granddaughter gave me World Without End for Christmas 10 years ago. Made myself get around to it within the year so that I could honestly claim (to her) I had read it, but discovered then that it was the 2nd of a series, so put it down and ordered the 1st book. And sighed and dove into Pillars of The Earth. Well, I enjoyed the journey. And so I read World Without End, convinced that indeed, it would never end, and then enjoyed the television series. He is a good writer, and I became involved.
That being said, I made a conscious decision NOT to try the series you have just begun. For one thing, as someone who lived through those times, I tend to quail at the mistakes present day fiction writers make. In fact, it takes such novels to make me realize how truly differently we grew up. How differently we were taught, fed, and organized. And how differently we spoke! Reading a story where people of the thirties and forties used words and expressions unheard of until the nineties and/or the 21st century is really upsetting to me. Also, we had Herman Wouk immortalize the period in fiction, and do it pretty well.
Discouraged in these ways, I have had to accept, and it has been like forcing oneself to swallow a dreadful medicine, that it is a certainty that ALL fiction ever written about a particular period in history is probably full of serious errors about how folk spoke, dressed, lived their daily lives and even thought: unless it is written IN those very years by an author LIVING in those years. This is one thing that makes Jane Austen great. She was an accurate spokesperson for her time and class.
So please give me your take on Follett's writing of those World War Two years and the before and after.