JoanP, the map in your # 146 is very helpful. They always are, I believe, in fact essential.
This one clearly shows the provinces of Slovenia and Croatia, the first to declare independence, as I had mentioned earlier.
Ann, the article about Serbia, especially its future, in the National Geographic , is confusing, I agree. It presupposes historical information many of us do not possess. That is precisely why I found Paris 1919 by Margaret Macmillan so clear on background and immensely helpful without being too detailed or overwhelming.
Part Tree of the book with the heading THE BALKANS AGAIN has a chapter about Yugoslavia (pp. 110 - 135)
On p. 111 Margaret Macmillan writes
Many people in Paris found the Balkans confusing. At his first meeting with (Serb statesman) Nikola Pasic (also spelled Pashitch), (British Prime Minister) Lloyd George inquired whether Serbs and Croats spoke the same language. Only a handful of specialists, or ranks, had made it their business to study the area. What most people knew was that the Balkans were dangerous for Europe; they had caused trouble for decades as the Ottoman empire disintegrated and Austria-Hungary and Russia vied for control; and they had sparked off the Great War when Serb nationalists assassinated the heir to the Austrian throne in Sarajevo.
JoanP,
The German occupation of Sarajevo in WW II began in 1941 and ended in 1945; the city was bombed. In the Bosnian war the city was shelled by the Serbs and also bombed again, according to an article by Andrew Marshall in Brussels in The Independent World of 4 August 1993. This is how it begins :
The allied agreement yesterday to United States plans for air strikes in Bosnia was obtained only after guarantees on the involvement of United Nations forces in their implementation, according to alliance sources.
The deal struck by the North Atlantic Council in the early hours reflects a careful trade-off. The US wanted a significant shift in the use of air power, with Nato playing an active leading role. France and Britain were concerned by this extension of the West's role in the hostilities and wanted limitations. The agreement released yesterday remains ambivalent in key areas, but its wording reflects a precise political balance.
The agreement was a clear warning to the Bosnian Serbs, said Stephen Oxman, US Assistat Secretary of State. 'If they do not cease their efforts to strangle Sarajevo, Nato will be prepared to use air power', he said. The outcome is a triumph for the Americans. Nato was also delighted that the US had shown decisive leadership, while the alliance had been kept together.
The siege lasted for almost four years, from April 1992 to February 1996.