Agree frybabe - going back is a challenge because too often when you read something you do not realize later it is going to be something to double check and so even highlighting is nice but I never know what to highlight for future reading - I only highlight because I have a reaction to a phrase or few sentences.
Hadn't realized but I guess our phone numbers are charted by party headquarters - my phone was ringing off the hook - at least 7 or 8 calls a day about voting - most of the time I just let my phone ring - I've it set to ring 3 times and then my voice message that says to leave a message and I will get back as soon as I can - well no message from those calling about voting or any robo calls which was the original reason I was no longer answering the phone - but the annoyance of that phone ringing all hours of the day and night - they were calling here as late as 11: at night and as early as 6:30 in the morning - well I voted the other day - I think it was Wednesday - and ALL voting type phone calls stopped - peculiarly interesting - not even any over this weekend - somehow my voting stopped the calls - peculiarly interesting...
Found this on Amazon - unfortunately no used copies or Kindle copy available - but reading the excerpts I was surprised to see how much of the book is available - it appears the entire book except the first two chapters on online as a look see...
Voting and Vote-Getting in American History by Robert J. Dinkin -
Seems our early voters were swayed by parades and banners etc. and the idea of actually explaining issues was not a part of voting til the very late 1800s and then issues became more involved and folks had to be educated on things like Tariffs. I'm thinking that is what we need now, any explaining is so one sided from that parties point of view we are not really given a chance to sort out the pluses and minuses or trade offs much less the purpose of various legislature and who is affected. All you hear is those who see it as a negative give you every which way why it should not take place, which often has more to do with agreeing or not with a party who wants power and therefore, they will agree or disagree with anything that helps them attain power positions.
Now here is a winner - two books absolutely free for your Kindle on Amazon - I downloaded both - catch that there are two separate authors for each edition.
Building the American Republic, Volume 1: A Narrative History to 1877 by Harry L. Watson
Building the American Republic, Volume 2: A Narrative History from 1877 by Jane Dailey
I'd forgotten that property ownership was a must to be allowed to vote during our early history till I saw this - do not think I will buy it but it was a good reminder:
Removal of the Property Qualification for Voting in the United States: Strategy and Suffrage (Routledge Research in American Politics and Governance) by Justin Moeller and Ronald F. King
So that is how women and the majority of blacks were excluded from voting - never put that together.
And evidently
No political party has every won an electoral majority on a program offering a socialist transformation of society. The authors explain why. Explained and laid out in:
Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism – November 1, 1986 by Adam Przeworski (Author), John Sprague (Author)
Ha get this - the price of a new copy
$3,053.01 Golly there is so much on Constitutional Law - fascinating -
Well I did it - was not going to add another book and could not pass up finding out more about Constitutional Law - Amazon and the Kindle make it too easy - a press of the button and I've now downloaded:
A Short and Happy Guide to Constitutional Law (Short and Happy Series) by Mark Alexander - had no idea that Constitutional law was a separate study - I thought all law was as a result of our Constitution and therefore, it was the basis for all study - I guess in a way but it evidently Constitutional Law is a study of its own. The titles of information listed in the index sound interesting - let's see how these titles relate to our current national state of affairs. I wonder if there is anything said in our Constitution about trade. Since I learned that Trade is one of a nation's biggest sources of revenue I'm really curious to learn how that works.
Did you know that there is such a thing as, Gender Equality & Trade Policy - had no clue - Evidently issues like: Gender Equality in the Context of Globalization, Trade Liberalization and the UN Development Agenda, Gender Perspectives in Trade Policy, Effects of Trade on Gender Equality in Labour Markets and Small-scale Enterprises, Trade, Agriculture, Food Security and Gender Equality, The Global Economic Crisis and its Impact on Trade and Gender Equality, Implementing Gender- Responsive Trade Policies: Obstacles and Good Practices are areas of discussion at the UN. Wow...
http://www.un.org/womenwatch/feature/trade/The-Way-Forward.htmlhttps://worldview.stratfor.com/article/free-trade-or-womens-rightsBig question here - the more I'm reading on these various site the more I can see the benefit for those nations with a history of poor representation allowed for women and the limited economic benefits for women - however, what I also see is, in order to raise these women it appears, especially by the plans and assistance of the
World Trade Organization, a flattening economic advancement for women who have enjoyed the economic advantages and more gender equality then they had during previous decades. Globalism has its feet in the door here and that is a plan for the money powers of the world to be the total power, overpowering national Constitutions and, a power in place without people participation through elections - hmmm there must be a way to raise the level of gender equality without depending on organizations like the WTO. Looks like lots to read here...