Gum and Ella - I have a problem in explaining why I like certain pieces of art and not others. It comes down to those two words for me "I like". What draws one to a particular piece of art is entirely subjective, imho. I know that probably sounds like a cop-out. I have no problem explaining why I like some art, but the first time I saw Jackson Pollock's "Blue Poles" i was enchanted, but when I saw a Rothko for the first time I felt nothing. I love Picasso, especially his Blue Period and his cubism, but Matisse does nothing for me. And so on. If I went to a ritzy gallery and saw "representational and abstract" works, I would probably love some, but not necessarily what some people regarded as the "masterpiece". As you say, Gum, it is just a style. Terms like representational and abstract may turn away potential art lovers, because they feel that they must see those pieces of art in that light. Is it something like the story of "The Emperor's New Clothes", or is there something that draws the majority to the masterpiece? I have spent quite some time pondering this question, as it applies to so many other aspects of life, e.g. poetry, books, colours, art, wine, even men, but as yet only come up with the answer - the appreciation of these things is, and must be, subjective, otherwise we would live in a world where there was only one artist; only one brand of wine; only one poet; only one writer. Tell me what you think?