Rosemary, no apologies needed! In our discussions, we have always expressed our thoughts, impressions and opinions freely but amicably and never looked for consensus. And we make sure to listen to each other - which is not always easy in this noisy world of words.
And listening to a different interpretation or perspective can be enriching.
In fact, it is my personal opinion that not liking a given book, or a character, does not necessarily preclude a productive discussion, quite the opposite can be true, and I have experienced just that, more than once.
The page numbers are not the same, of course, because they are in the American edition of the book, which was given a new title and contains no Anglicisms (colour; honour; globalisation).
I believe the urgent admonition to readers to keep "mum" about the developments is unusual and wonder whether you had the same "injunction" in England when "The Other Hand" came out in 2008. Does your book cover mention it?
As for the violence. Sad to say, we are exposed to violence and brutality every single day wherever we live - stabbings; shootings; babies shaken to death by a parent; a very recent school shooting; a 10-year old in rural Ohio, who kept a rack of loaded guns in his room, shooting his mother to death because he didn't want to carry in firewood. What kind of society are we becoming ?
I too have expressed reservations about Sarah earlier, but I'm willing to read on, slowly, until at least part of the story is told, what exactly happened on the beach.
The batman connection seemed odd to me, a little dated. It may have been necessary for the plot. Yet so far I believe that LB's journey is the plot.
I still believe what I said in the very beginning, that this is a story for our time and of our times. Even though are bound to be countless similar ones, it has never been told like this before.
Is it realistic ? Marie asked.
I'm not sure about the word. For example, are reality shows realistic ? I couldn't answer that because I've never watched one.
So is it possible? Absolutely. The growing numbers of asylum seekers from Africa or Sri Lanka speak for themselves. And they are not all men.
LB arrived in England alone. Nkirura was not with her.
Charlie was not along on the trip to Nigeria in 200.
Sarah had received a promotional offer at the magazine and persuaded Andrew to take the trip, for it might salvage the faltering marriage. That is a tenuous strand in the plot. As a columnist at the Times Andrew would have had knowledge about the dangers in the country.
HATS, I feel very much like you about the book and LB. I like the compilation you made. A good idea. Will try to emulate, if you don't mind, with Chapter 3.
More tomorrow.